Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What Happens When We “STEMify” Our Schools?
Mapping the direction of Owatonna’s STEM initiative.
Tom Meagher, PhDDistrict STEM Coordinator
Owatonna Public SchoolsOwatonna, MNMnCOSE 2015
The status of STEM Education in MNResults of how students taking the ACT fared
based on interest and performance in STEM fields on 2013 ACT exams.
Differences in student interest and academic performance shows more divergence when examined by ethnicity.
Results of this study did not explore if students had previous schooling in STEM.
Minnesota College Readiness as Measured by ACT Exam 2013
MN ACT Data by ethnicity & gender
“Essentially, stronger and earlier support structures and interventions related to career and educational planning and academic preparedness are needed to see real differences in these still troubling numbers.” [College Board]
Models of STEM Teaching & Learning
Science, technology, engineering and math are taught, but are separate subjects.
Science
Engineering Math
Technology
STEM subjects are integrated.
Science
Engineering Math
Technology
STEM
STEM is embedded in all subject areas
Math
Technology
STEM Curriculum
Science
Engineering
What STEM means in ISD 761
Teaching of Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math is shifting from traditional instruction to integrated lessons where students solve problems and engineering challenges in classes.
STEM embedded among all subject areas emphasizes that all students can learn rigorous academic subject matter.
Students recognize that the main goals of lessons build with each other and relate to real world learning.
Lessons are designed to build:
“STEM literacy & STEM fluency”
Developing a learning modelWe agree with the emphasis for STEM literacy &
fluency, however STEM experience is essential to develop literacy and fluency skills.
Students are engaged in active investigations, inquiry and engineering challenges as common experiences.
We want students to publish their work and share it with others “Show-it”. This allows for multiple forms of student dialogue and publication.
When all these ideas are combined a STEM learning model emerges:
STEM learning model guides instruction in all content areas such
as: ELL: Using STEM experience for front loading language development.
Environmental Education “ESTEM”: Builds STEM learning on a foundation of environmental principles examining how society, culture and ecosystems interact.
Physical Education & Music incorporate science and engineering into kinesthetic lessons.
Special Education: Integrating STEM into IEP and inclusion learning creates opportunities for differentiation.
Perpich Foundation & Art: Integration of Arts into STEM lessons at all grade levels.
NEXUS: Using STEM to address social & racial achievement gaps in student learning.
PAGE: Addressing gender equity through STEM.
Measuring the Impacts of the Owatonna STEM Education Initiative
Student Attitudes Towards STEM interest survey using tool developed by North Carolina University (NCU).
STEM teaching efficacy survey also created by NCU School of Education with a National Science Foundation Grant.
NWEA and Dibels student academic growth data.
MCA III proficiency scores, delineated by ethnicity and gender for each grade level and STEM site.
Community engagement and involvement with STEM schools & ESTEM Teams
Student attitudes towards Math
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
African 3.7
Asian4.5
Hispanic3.7
Multiracial3.7
Native American3.0
Caucasian3.9
Response to: "I am good at math"
Mean scores of major ethnic groups
SD
D
N
A
SA
Student attitudes towards Science
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Series31.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Response to: "I know I can do well in science."
Mean scores for major ethnic groupsSD
D
N
A
SA
Student attitudes towards careers in science
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Series31.0
1.01.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Response to: "I would consider a career in science"
Mean scores of major ethnic groups
SD
D
N
A
SA
Student attitudes toward engineering careers
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Series31.0
1.0
1.0
1.01.0
1.0
Response to: "I know I could do well at a career in engineering"
Mean scores for major ethnic groups
SD
D
N
A
SA
Gender attitudes of engineering careers
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Series31.0
1.0
1.01.0
1.0
Response to: "I would consider a career in engineering.
Mean MALE scores for major ethnic groups
SD
D
N
A
SA
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Series31.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
Response to: "I would consider a career in engineering."
Mean FEMALE scores for major ethnic groupsSD
D
N
A
S
A
Responses from students on “Student Attitudes Towards STEM Learning Survey
Prompt: “What did you learn this year that had an impact on you?” & “What would you tell other students about STEM?”
4th Grade students at McKinley WORDLE of response data:
Responses from students on “Student Attitudes Towards STEM Learning Survey
Prompt: “What did you learn this year that had an impact on you?” & “What would you tell other students about STEM?”
5th Grade students at McKinley WORDLE of response data:
Responses from students on “Student Attitudes Towards STEM Learning Survey
Prompt: “What did you learn this year that had an impact on you?”
6th Grade students at Willow Creek WORDLE of response data:
Teacher attitudes towards STEM
Growth Area for Professional Development & Instructional Support
Teachers’ perceptions of STEM
Student academic performance
Preliminary results show improvement in test scores.
Significant differences are observed among ethnic groups in reading and math.
Growth rates in reading and math are highest among minority and low SES students across the K-8 STEM students.
Students with 2 years of STEM appear to have higher scores than peers with less than 2 years.
Analysis of two years worth of student performance scores will show more detailed information.
Mean Math MCAIII performance by ethnicity for sum percent of “meets” &
“exceeds” benchmark.
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
African 17.8 32 37.4 48.1
Hispanic 35.3 61.1 44.4 50
White 69.7 71.1 71.7 75
5.0
15.0
25.0
35.0
45.0
55.0
65.0
75.0
85.0
95.0
Sum
Perc
ent
pro
fici
ency
for
"meets
" &
"exc
eeds"
bench
mark
s
Mean Reading MCAIII performance by ethnicity for sum percent of “meets” & “exceeds” benchmark.
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
African 58.3 40.7 28.5
Hispanic 53 33.3 50
White 84.2 58.6 60.8
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
95
Sum
Perc
ent
pro
fici
ency
for
"meets
" &
"exc
eeds"
bench
mark
s
Academic progress at McKinley STEM School: Reading
Sate Non-ELL
School ELL
State Non-SpEd
School SpEd
State FRP School FRP
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.0035
0.3288
0.021
0.3056
0.0686
0.1344
Comparison of Non-ethnic cells Reading MCA
Whi
te (s
tate
)
Nativ
e Am
erica
n
Africa
n
Asian
Hispan
ic -0.1
-5.55111512312578E-17
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.0283
0.3917
0.092
-0.0161
0.3187
Comparison of growth among ethnic groups: Reading MCA
Academic progress at McKinley STEM School: Math
Sate Non-ELL
School ELL
State Non-SpEd
School SpEd
State FRP School FRP
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.0034
0.3022
0.0265
0.3674
0.0818
0.1986
Comparison of Non-ethnic cells Math MCA
White (s-tate)
Native American
African Asian Hispanic
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0.0317
2.1764
0.3139
-1.2326
0.4988
Comparison ethnic groups Math MCA
Combined Math Reading Combined Math reading
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.2361
0.3461
0.1247
-0.2237-0.2651
-0.1819
MMR Growth
Achievement Gap Reduction
Questions?
