31
1 1 Immigrants at School Immigrant Students at School Easing the Journey towards Integration

Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

11 Immigrants at School

Immigrant Students at School Easing the Journey towards Integration

Andreas SchleicherDirector for Education and Skills

12 October 2016

Page 2: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

22 Poverty is not destinyPISA Math skills of 15-year-olds by decile of social backgroundM

exic

oCh

ileGr

eece

Nor

way

Swed

enIc

elan

dIs

rael

Italy

Uni

ted

Stat

esSp

ain

Denm

ark

Luxe

mbo

urg

Aust

ralia

Irela

ndU

nite

d Ki

ngdo

mHu

ngar

yCa

nada

Finl

and

Aust

riaTu

rkey

Liec

hten

stei

nCz

ech

Repu

blic

Esto

nia

Port

ugal

Slov

enia

Slov

ak R

epub

licN

ew Z

eala

ndGe

rman

yN

ethe

rland

sFr

ance

Switz

erla

ndPo

land

Belg

ium

Japa

nM

acao

-Chi

naHo

ng K

ong-

Chin

aKo

rea

Sing

apor

eCh

ines

e Ta

ipei

Shan

ghai

-Chi

na300

325

350

375

400

425

450

475

500

525

550

575

600

625

650

675

Source: PISA 2012

Page 3: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

Are our schools prepared to help immigrant students integrate into their new communities?

Even before this latest influx, the population of immigrant students in OECD countries had been growing. In 2012, 11% of 15-year-old students had an immigrant background, on

average across OECD countries. Between 2003 and 2012, the share of immigrant students had grown by between 4 and 6 percentage points in Ireland, Italy and Spain

4

Page 4: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

5 Relationship between the percentage of immigrant students and a school system’s average performance in reading

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40350

400

450

500

550

600

512

490509

523

441

516524

505508

483

523

486

538536

424

511

512504518

463

509

475

498

496

394

396410

436

403

Costa Rica

485

545

396

399393

489

516

477

398

422

384

438

475

446

570

542523

441

404411

508

Percentage of 15-year-old immigrant students

PISA Score

1 2

34

5

6

8

9

10

7

No relationship between share of immigrant students and learning

outcomes(even after accounting for disadvantage)

No negative impact of increase in immigration on PISA performance

(2003-2012)

Page 5: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

High aspirations

In some countries the share of disadvantaged students who perform among the top quarter of all PISA students is larger among immigrant

students than among non-immigrantsMost immigrant students hold an ambition to succeed that matches, and

sometimes surpasses, the aspirations of families in their host country

6

Page 6: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

7 Disadvantaged students who are top performers

Mexico

Costa Rica

Jordan

Kazakh

stan

Icelan

d

Portuga

l

Malaysia

Norway

Spain

New Zeala

nd

Austria

Israe

lLat

via

OECD av

erage

Serbia

Luxembourg

Germany

Liech

tenstein

Switz

erland

Canad

a

Australia

Macao-China

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80Immigrants Non-immigrants%

Percentage of disadvantaged students performing among the top quarter of all students in mathematics, by immigrant status

Page 7: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

The culture and the education acquired before migrating have an impact on student

performance…

…but the country where students settle matters more

8

Page 8: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

9

Second generation immigrant students’ performance in mathematics, by country of origin and destination

Austria

Belgium

Switzerland

Germany

Denmark

Netherlands

Austria

Belgium

Switzerland

Germany

Denmark

Netherlands

370.0 390.0 410.0 430.0 450.0 470.0 490.0 510.0

First-generation immigrants' score, after accounting for socio-economic status

PISA score points in mathematics

2nd generation students from

Turkey in:

Country of origin and country of destination

1st generation students from

Turkey in:

First generation immigrant students’ performance in mathematics, by country of origin and destination

Page 9: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

10

Immigrant students’ performance in mathematics, by country of origin and destination

Australia

Macao-China

New Zealand

Hong Kong-China

Qatar

Finland

Denmark

United Arab Emirates

Netherlands

300 350 400 450 500 550 600

First-generation immigrants' score, after accounting for socio-economic status

PISA score points in mathematics

Students from Arabic-speak-

ing countries in:

Students from China in:

Denmark

Qatar

United Arab Emirates

Netherlands

Finland

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95%

Percentage of students with an immigrant backgroundwho reported that they feel like they belong at school

Country of origin and country of destination

Students from Arabic-speak-

ing countries in:

Page 10: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

11Percentage of second-generation immigrant studentswho reported that they feel like they belong at school

France

Belgium Braz

il

Irelan

d

Hong K

ong-C

hina

Italy

Swed

enMexi

coQata

r

United

Kingd

om

Switze

rland

Singa

pore

Argenti

na

United

Arab Em

irates

Austria

New Zea

land

Portu

gal

Greece

Norway

Israe

l0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Page 11: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

What the hosts think

12

Page 12: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

13Individual reports on whether the country is made a worse or better place to live by immigrants

Russian FederationPortugal

Slovak RepublicItaly

Czech RepublicHungary

FranceIsrael

BelgiumUnited Kingdom

SloveniaEstonia

LithuaniaAverageBulgaria

SpainGermany

SwitzerlandNetherlands

IrelandFinlandNorwayPoland

AlbaniaDenmarkSwedenIceland

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Mean score

Worse place Better place

Page 13: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

14Allow many/few immigrants of different or same race/ethnic group from majority

Swed

en

Norw

ay

Germ

any

Pola

nd

Neth

erla

nds

Switz

erla

nd

Irela

nd

Belg

ium

Denm

ark

Spai

n

Fran

ce

Italy

Slov

enia

Finla

nd

Aver

age

Unite

d Ki

ngdo

m

Portu

gal

Czec

h Re

publ

ic

Hung

ary

Israe

l1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0 Same 2012 Different 2012Allow few

Allow many

Page 14: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

The double disadvantage

15

Page 15: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

16Percentage of immigrant students in schools where at least half of the students are immigrants

Hon

g K

ong-

Chin

a

Ger

man

y

Arg

enti

na

Swit

zerl

and

Slov

enia

Isra

el

Net

herl

ands

New

Zea

land

Belg

ium

Uni

ted

Stat

es

Fran

ce

Spai

n

OEC

D a

vera

ge

Luxe

mbo

urg

Kaz

akhs

tan

Aus

tria

Uni

ted

Kin

gdom

Aus

tral

ia

Swed

en

Mac

ao-C

hina

Nor

way

Den

mar

k

Ital

y

Cana

da

Gre

ece

Qat

ar

Uni

ted

Ara

b Em

...50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

Page 16: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

Kore

aIsr

ael

Latv

iaSlo

venia

Polan

dAr

gent

inaNe

ther

lands

Colom

biaFr

ance

Tunis

iaQa

tar

Thail

and

Gree

ceRo

man

iaRu

ssian

Fed.

Austr

iaCr

oatia

U.A.

E.Ge

rman

yHu

ngar

yLu

xem

bour

gBe

lgium

Jord

anVi

et N

amUn

ited

Stat

esCz

ech

Repu

blic

Turk

eyIn

done

siaSh

angh

ai-Ch

inaSw

eden

New

Zeala

ndCh

inese

Taip

ei

-0.5

-0.3

-0.1

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.7

0.9

1.1

1.3

1.5

Mea

n in

dex

diffe

renc

e

More teacher shortage in disadvantaged schools

Less teacher shortage in disadvantaged schools

Few countries attract the most talented teachers to the most challenging classrooms

Page 17: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

The importance of early integration

18

Page 18: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

19Reading performance of immigrant students, by attendance at pre-primary education

Braz

il

Mex

ico

35

Mal

aysi

a

Cost

a Ri

ca

Kaza

khst

an 3

6

Qat

ar 4

8

Jord

an 3

4

Mon

tene

gro

Gree

ce

Slov

enia

Spai

n 5

2

Swed

en 6

7

Italy

88

Russ

ian

Fede

ratio

n ...

Port

ugal

49

Luxe

mbo

urg

40

OEC

D av

erag

e 4

9

Switz

erla

nd

Croa

tia

Serb

ia

Unite

d Ar

ab E

mira

te...

New

Zea

land

90

Mac

ao-C

hina

81

Irela

nd

Cana

da 4

5

Aust

ralia

54

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

Had attended pre-primary education Had not attended pre-primary educationMean score

Page 19: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

20 Difference in the likelihood of having attended pre-primary education between immigrant students and non-immigrant students

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0After accounting for students' socio-economic status

Odds ratio

Immigrant students are more likely to have at-tended pre-primary education

Immigrant students are less likely to have attended pre-

primary education

Page 20: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

Narrowing the performance gap

21

Page 21: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

22Change between 2003 and 2012 in mathematics performance, by immigrant background

Belg

ium

-2

3

Den

mar

k

Fran

ce

Swit

zerl

and

Aus

tria

Mex

ico

Net

herl

ands

Ger

man

y -

43

Port

ugal

Swed

en

Luxe

mbo

urg

Nor

way

Spai

n

OEC

D a

vera

ge 2

003

Ital

y

Rus

sian

Fed

erat

ion

New

Zea

land

Cana

da

14

Uni

ted

Stat

es

Latv

ia

Irel

and

Hon

g K

ong-

Chin

a

Mac

ao-C

hina

Aus

tral

ia

-41

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

Difference between non-immigrants and second-generation immigrant students

PISA 2012 PISA 2003

Scor

e-po

int

diff

eren

ce

Page 22: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

23

Percentage of lower secondary teachers indicating they have a high level of need for professional development in the area of teaching in a multicultural or multilingual setting.

Net

herla

nds

Aust

ralia

Latv

ia

Sing

apor

e

Unite

d St

ates

Czec

h Re

publ

ic

Finl

and

Pola

nd

Denm

ark

Nor

way

Slov

ak R

epub

lic

Icel

and

Esto

nia

Serb

ia

Mal

aysia

Japa

n

Swed

en

Croa

tia

Fran

ce

Israe

l

Bulg

aria

Port

ugal

Kore

a

Spai

n

Rom

ania

Chile

Italy

Mex

ico

Braz

il

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

%

Teachers looking for help

Page 23: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

24Percentage of students in schools where the principal reports that ethnic diversity hinders learning

0

5

10

15

20

25

Avantaged schools Disadvantaged schools All schools%

Page 24: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

Policy responses

Low impact on outcomes

High impact on outcomes

High cost/complexity Low cost/complexity

Money pits

Must haves

Low hanging fruits

Quick wins

Language integration

Early ECEC

Parent engagement

Building capacity

Limiting tracking and grade repetition

Limiting congregation in disadvantaged schools

Monitoring

Page 25: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

Policy responses

Low impact on outcomes

High impact on outcomes

High cost/complexity Low cost/complexity

Money pits

Must haves

Low hanging fruits

Quick wins

Language integration

Early ECEC

Parent engagement

Building capacity

Limiting tracking and grade repetition

Limiting congregation in disadvantaged schools

Monitoring

Students seem to acquire a new language faster when they are

immersed in that language from the outset, rather than placed in separate

language classes.Language tuition is beneficial, but only

when it is in addition to regular classroom instruction, such as in after-

school classes and during holiday breaks.

Page 26: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

Policy responses

Low impact on outcomes

High impact on outcomes

High cost/complexity Low cost/complexity

Money pits

Must haves

Low hanging fruits

Quick wins

Language integration

Early ECEC

Parent engagement

Building capacity

Limiting tracking and grade repetition

Limiting congregation in disadvantaged schools

Monitoring

If children enter such programmes at the age of 2 or 3 they have a chance of

starting school at almost the same level as non-immigrant children.

Targeted home visits can help families to support their child’s learning at home and can also ease entry into

appropriate education services

Page 27: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

Policy responses

Low impact on outcomes

High impact on outcomes

High cost/complexity Low cost/complexity

Money pits

Must haves

Low hanging fruits

Quick wins

Language integration

Early ECEC

Parent engagement

Building capacity

Limiting tracking and grade repetition

Limiting congregation in disadvantaged schools

Monitoring

While many classrooms are now filled with immigrants, the teachers in these

classrooms are often ill-prepared in pedagogical approaches for second-

language learning or in recognising and helping children overcome the effects of

trauma that many immigrant children endure.

Page 28: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

Policy responses

Low impact on outcomes

High impact on outcomes

High cost/complexity Low cost/complexity

Money pits

Must haves

Low hanging fruits

Quick wins

Language integration

Early ECEC

Parent engagement

Building capacity

Limiting tracking and grade repetition

Limiting congregation in disadvantaged schools

Monitoring

Schools that struggle to do well for domestic students struggle even more with a large population of immigrant.

Countries that distribute migrant students across a mix of schools achieve better outcomes for these students. A more

even distribution also relieves the pressure on schools and teachers when large numbers of immigrant students

arrive over a short period of time

Page 29: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

Policy responses

Low impact on outcomes

High impact on outcomes

High cost/complexity Low cost/complexity

Money pits

Must haves

Low hanging fruits

Quick wins

Language integration

Early ECEC

Parent engagement

Building capacity

Limiting tracking and grade repetition

Limiting congregation in disadvantaged schools

Monitoring

While teachers are critical to migrant students’ success in schools, so are their parents. Students do better when their parents understand the importance of

schooling, how the school system works, and how best to support their child’s

progress through school.

Page 30: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

Policy responses

Low impact on outcomes

High impact on outcomes

High cost/complexity Low cost/complexity

Money pits

Must haves

Low hanging fruits

Quick wins

Language integration

Early ECEC

Parent engagement

Building capacity

Limiting tracking and grade repetition

Limiting congregation in disadvantaged schools

MonitoringTargeted funding

While ability grouping, grade repetition and tracking reinforce social background for non-immigrant students, immigrant

students are even more likely to be affected by these practices. Language

difficulties and cultural differences can be misinterpreted as lack of ability and

potential.

Page 31: Migration and Integration (Part 2) - October 2016 Meeting of the OECD Global Parliamentary Network

www.oecd.org/edu [email protected]

Follow us on:

@OECDEduSkills @EduSkills OECD @EduSkills OECD