44
Rubrics and Peer-Review in Canvas: Examples from FAS and HKS Daniel Jamous, Senior Instructional Technologist, Academic Technology Services, Harvard University Information Technology Alice Heath, Master in Public Policy Candidate, Harvard Kennedy School Kelly Miller , Lecturer on Applied Physics, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Salimah Samji , Manager of Building State Capability Program, Center for International Development, Harvard Kennedy School Allison Pingree, Director of Professional Pedagogy, Strengthening Learning and Teaching Excellence (SLATE), Harvard Kennedy School IT Summit June 2 2016

It summit 2016_combined

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: It summit 2016_combined

Rubrics and Peer-Review in Canvas: Examples from FAS and HKS

Daniel Jamous, Senior Instructional Technologist, Academic Technology Services, Harvard University Information Technology

Alice Heath, Master in Public Policy Candidate, Harvard Kennedy School

Kelly Miller, Lecturer on Applied Physics, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences

Salimah Samji, Manager of Building State Capability Program, Center for International Development, Harvard Kennedy School

Allison Pingree, Director of Professional Pedagogy, Strengthening Learning and Teaching Excellence (SLATE), Harvard Kennedy School

IT Summit June 2 2016

Page 2: It summit 2016_combined

UsingCanvasforPeerReviewatHKS:PolicyAnalysis&Design(API-505)

AllisonPingree &AliceHeathHarvardITSummit

Thursday,June2,2016- 2:20– 3:15pm

Page 3: It summit 2016_combined

CourseContext:API-505,PolicyAnalysis&Design• Required forall1st-yearMastersofPublicPolicyStudents

• 4sections,eachtaughtbyadifferent faculty

• Integratesothercorecourses, leadingtodeliverables thatreflectthepracticeofreal-worldpublicpolicy:memos,oralbriefings, slidedecks

• Onesection(coursehead,Prof.JohnDonahue,chairofMPPProgram)mademostextensiveuseofpeerreviewandrubricsinCanvas

• Twoothersectionsusedpeerreview inCanvaswithsimplifiedrubric;4thusedpeerreviewviae-mail

Page 4: It summit 2016_combined

WhyUsePeerReviewwithaRubric?WhyinCanvas?

• WeknewfromSpringExercise[experiential capstone]thatthedraft-feedback-rewritecycleisagreattoolforlearning.

• Wealsoknewfrompriorversionsofthiscoursethatthefacultysimplycouldn’tgivedetailedfeedbackoneverydraft,especiallynotintimeforittobeuseful.

• We’dlearned fromobserving theNegotiationcoursethattheMPPs—especiallyincohorts—wereskilledatdealingwitheachothercandidlybutthoughtfully.

• Coursefocusitselfistheevaluationofoptionsalongvariouscriteria - rubricallowedustobemoretransparent aboutquality,andpracticewhatwepreach.

• Weneededawaytomanagethelogistical complexityofpairingupstudentsandtrackingtheirexchanges.

Page 5: It summit 2016_combined
Page 6: It summit 2016_combined
Page 7: It summit 2016_combined
Page 8: It summit 2016_combined

Overall,HowDiditGo?In-classpollofstudents:

• verystrongsupportfortheusefulness ofthepeerreviews (~40%extremelyuseful,30%definitelyuseful,20%somewhatuseful,and10%orlessnotuseful)

End-of-courseevaluations:mentioned5xasoneof“2-3mostvaluableaspects”ofcourse:

• “Requiringustoprovidepeerfeedbackonthefirstmemoassignmentwasveryhelpful--forcedustodosomethingthatwewouldnothavedoneotherwise,butwasreallyvaluable.”

• “Thepeerfeedbackmechanismwasexcellent.Ourgroupfounditsovaluablethatweorganizedpeerfeedbackforthelastassignment eventhoughitwasn'trequired.”

Faculty:

• “Ithinkitwasoneofthebestfeaturesofthecoursethisyear.... Canvas,whilenotwithoutitsglitches, isahugeleapforward.”

Page 9: It summit 2016_combined

ButNotWithoutItsChallenges...1) Canvasdoesnotallowyoutosetadeadlinewithinpeerreview,ortograde

thequalityofthepeerreview.

2) Thereareseveral differentwaystogivefeedbackonCanvaspeerreview,someofwhichmissthemainpointofdoingpeer review.

• Lineedits• Attachfiles• Usearubric• Writeageneral comment

3) Fromastudent’sperspective, findingtheirpeers’ reviewcommentsisnotintuitive-- thereareseveral routestoseedifferent typesoffeedback.

Page 10: It summit 2016_combined

ButNotWithoutItsChallenges...1) Canvasdoesnotallowyoutosetadeadlinewithinpeerreview,ortograde

thequalityofthepeerreview.

2) Thereareseveral differentwaystogivefeedbackonCanvaspeerreview,someofwhichmissthemainpointofdoingpeer review.

• Lineedits• Attachfiles• Usearubric• Writeageneral comment

3) Fromastudent’sperspective, findingtheirpeers’ reviewcommentsisnotintuitive-- thereareseveral routestoseedifferent typesoffeedback.

Page 11: It summit 2016_combined
Page 12: It summit 2016_combined
Page 13: It summit 2016_combined

ButNotWithoutItsChallenges...1) Canvasdoesnotallowyoutosetadeadlinewithinpeerreview,ortograde

thequalityofthepeerreview.

2) Thereareseveral differentwaystogivefeedbackonCanvaspeerreview,someofwhichmissthemainpointofdoingpeer review

• Lineedits• Attachfiles• Usearubric• Writeageneral comment

3) Fromastudent’sperspective, findingtheirpeers’ reviewcommentsisnotintuitive-- thereareseveral routestoseedifferent typesoffeedback.

Page 14: It summit 2016_combined
Page 15: It summit 2016_combined
Page 16: It summit 2016_combined
Page 17: It summit 2016_combined
Page 18: It summit 2016_combined

ButNotWithoutItsChallenges...1) Canvasdoesnotallowyoutosetadeadlinewithinpeerreview,ortograde

thequalityofthepeerreview.

2) Thereareseveral differentwaystogivefeedbackonCanvaspeerreview,someofwhichmissthemainpointofdoingpeer review.

• Lineedits• Attachfiles• Usearubric• Writeageneral comment

3) Fromastudent’sperspective, findingtheirpeers’ reviewcommentsisnotintuitive-- thereareseveral routestoseedifferent typesoffeedback.

Page 19: It summit 2016_combined
Page 20: It summit 2016_combined

LessonsLearned• Strategies

• Ifyouwanttosetadeadlineorgradethepeerreview,createanewassignment.• Createadocumentwithinstructionsonhowtogiveandviewpeerfeedback.

• Usescreenshots.• Testtheinstructionsfromastudent’sperspective.

• Benefits• Tostudents:

• Peersofferedvaluableinsights• Givingfeedbacktoothersfocusedthemonassessment criteria,whichclarifiedhowtoimprovetheirownwork

• ToFaculty:• Logisticsfarmorestreamlinedandsimplified (vs.manual/email)• Easiertocheckcompletion• Requiredfewerdocuments– rubricintegrated• Abilitytouseanonymousfeedback

Page 21: It summit 2016_combined

AAP 50 and Canvas

Page 22: It summit 2016_combined

AP50lectures group work exams projects

• Physics as a Foundation for Science & Engineering

• new class in SEAS Sept. 2012

• 30 students first year, now 75 students

• undergraduate engineering students

• project and team based

• “Flipped classroom”

Applied Physics 50

Page 23: It summit 2016_combined
Page 24: It summit 2016_combined

Team & Project Based Learning

Page 25: It summit 2016_combined

AP50lectures group work exams projects

• 3 projects per semester

• 3 groupings per semester

• final report for each project

• teaching staff provides feedback on reports via rubrics uploaded on Canvas

• teams resubmit reports (via Canvas) for a final grade

Canvas for Groups and Reports

Page 26: It summit 2016_combined
Page 27: It summit 2016_combined
Page 28: It summit 2016_combined
Page 29: It summit 2016_combined
Page 30: It summit 2016_combined
Page 31: It summit 2016_combined

Our$challenge:$How$to$diffuse$our$ideas$and$create$a$community$of$practice?

• Huge%demand%for%PDIA,%short%supply%of%faculty• Change%agents%in%developing%countries%cannot%afford%to%attend%an%executive%education%course– Sustainable%change%requires%teaching%teams%who%work%together

– There%is%a%spacing%effect%of%learning%in%one’s%own%environment%

• Why%not%experiment%with%a%MOOC?

Page 32: It summit 2016_combined

Our$answer:$Canvas$Catalog

• We%already%had:– Blog:%International%following%(155%countries)– 34%high%quality%3P5%min%videos%%(why?)

• Canvas%Catalog– No%Harvard%ID%required%to%sign%up– Easy%to%use– Do%It%Yourself%(DIY)

Page 33: It summit 2016_combined

What$did$we$do?

• Launched%our%first%MOOC%on%Nov.%8,%2015– 6%weeks–Weekly%assignments• Written%answers%(no%quiz)• 4%conceptual%and%2%openPended

–Weekly%reflection%exercises– Average%of%3P5%hours%of%work– Peer%review%and%rubric%tool%• to%grade%and%to%learn%from%each%other

Page 34: It summit 2016_combined

Example$of$assignment$rubric

Page 35: It summit 2016_combined

241$people$from$53$countries$completed$Part$I

Top$10$Countries

# ofStudents

United%States 34Nigeria 31Peru 21Great%Britain 15India 8Kenya 7Tanzania 7Pakistan 7Nepal 6TimorPLeste 6

Page 36: It summit 2016_combined

What$did$we$learn?

Page 37: It summit 2016_combined

79%$rated$the$Peer$reviewsgood$or$higher

Page 38: It summit 2016_combined

“The$peer$reviews$were$truly$amazing."A"huge"part"of"it"was"helpful"and"usually"highlighted"areas"I"may"not"have"considered.”

“Very"useful"and"have"never$had$it$so$good$in$all$the$online$programs$i have"undertaken"in"the"past”

“I"think"the"peer"review"was"a"very"good"opportunity"to"engage"with"like=minded"persons"that"provided$competent$reflection$and$criticism.”

“Generally"good."In"fact"I"think"the"act"of"peer"reviewing"is"more"valuable"than"the"act"of"being"peer"reviewed."Doing"the"reviewing"forces"me"to"think"seriously"about"another"person's"take"on"the"question.”

“It"is$informative$to"read"others"reflections,"and"adds$to$the$community$feel$of"the"course.”

Student$Feedback$on$Peer$Reviews

Page 39: It summit 2016_combined

“A"little"disappointing."A"couple"offered"interesting"comments"that"were"worth"thinking"about"but"others$were$delayed$or$not$completed.”

“Peer"review"assignments"were"very"useful"except"that"it"was"very"difficult"to"find"course"colleagues"to"comment"on"work"consistently."It"looks"like"people"were$very$busy$and$could$not$find$much$time$to$peer9review$work.”

“Sometimes,"a"reviewer"can"score"a"student"low,"because"of"his/her"limited$understanding$of$the$concepts.”

“Some"reviewers"do"not"simply"understand"the"concept"or"the"problem,"hence"they"provide"minimal"contribution."

Student$Feedback$(cont’d)

Page 40: It summit 2016_combined

Valuable$feedback$and$peer$interaction

Page 41: It summit 2016_combined

Generic$no$value$add

Page 42: It summit 2016_combined

Limited$understanding$of$the$concepts

Page 43: It summit 2016_combined

Limited$understanding$of$concept/language

Page 44: It summit 2016_combined

Where$to$next?

• More%specific%questions/prompts%for%reviewer–What%did%you%like?–What%would%you%suggest%for%improvement?– How%does%this%differ%from%what%you%learnt?

• Assignments– Hired%graders%

• Flipped%classroom%Fall%2016– Opportunity%to%test%peer%review%in%residential%course%(calibrated%reviews)