View
28
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Oxford Major Programmes Ltd
Stakeholder
Management 22/03/17
Benedict Pinches
Vincent Van Gogh, The Potato Eaters, 1885
Project Stakeholders
“A person or organisation
that is: actively involved in
the project, whose interests
may be positively or
negatively affected either by
the work of the project or
the outputs from the
project, and who may exert
influence over the project or
its deliverables.” (PMBoK)
2
“Individuals or groups with
an interest in the project,
programme or portfolio
because they are involved
in the work or affected by
the outcomes” (APMBoK)
“A stakeholder is any group or
individual who can affect, or is
affected by, the achievement of
a corporation’s purpose.”project’s purpose.
Ed Freeman
Ed Freeman, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, 1984
Community
Engagement?
12-home hamlet
Split by train line
Want to work with the
Company…
What do you do?
Not ‘Soft’ but ‘Real’
Adaptability
Consistency
Resilience Hunger to learn
CompassionEmpathy
Competitiveness
Passion for customer service
Emotional intelligence
Endurance
Enthusiasm
Ethical
Etiquette
Friendliness
BalanceDiplomacyMotivation
Self awareness
Self confidence
Humour
Strategic thinker
Tolerance
Focus Decisive
Diligent
EntrepreneurialFacilitation
Goal-setting
Innovative
Listening Tasteful
CreativeCritical thinking
Acceptance
MentoringGood judgement
Charisma
Influence
Inspiring
Negotiation
Presentation
Persuasion
Story telling
Seth Goldin, Medium, 2017
Project Management is…
Art
Science Craft
Project
Management
Henry Mintzberg, Managing, 2009
Buyers
Builders
Users
PM Teamlawyers
special
interest
groups
Government
Regulators
audit
financial
beneficiaries
negative
stakeholders
PR
designersarchitects
consultants
technicians
general public
operators
support
Stakeholders and Benefits
Gareth Morgan, Imaginization
CLARITY OF WHY
DISCIPLINE OF HOW
CONSISTENCY OF WHAT
Simon Sinek, How Great Leaders Inspire Action, 2009
Stakeholder
Identification
Who might be affected?
Who are the voiceless?
Who is responsible for what is
intended?
Who is likely to mobilise for or
against what is intended?
Who can execute control on what is
intended?
Internal versus
external stakeholders
Internal
team
Core
externals
Rest of
the world
Alex Budzier, Essentials of Project Management for Engineers and Scientists, 2015
Project StakeholdersPower-Interest Map
12
Context setters Players
Crowd Subjects
High
Power
Low
Low Interest High
Power: the stakeholder’s position in the organisation or issue
Interest: the stakeholder’s ability to affect the organisations’ or
issue’s future
Alex Budzier, Essentials of Project Management for Engineers and Scientists, 2015
Project StakeholdersPower-Interest Map
13
Keep satisfied
Moderate priority
Need to keep this group
sufficiently involved
Manage closely
Highest priority
Manage through active
engagement
Monitor only
Lowest priority
Don’t overload them with
communication
Keep informed
Moderate priority
Objective is to sustain
their interest and leverage
when useful to the project
High
Power
Low
Low Interest High
Power: the stakeholder’s position in the organisation or issue
Interest: the stakeholder’s ability to affect the organisations’ or
issue’s future
Alex Budzier, Essentials of Project Management for Engineers and Scientists, 2015
Stakeholder Attributes
Attributes
Power: the ability of
stakeholders to bring about
outcomes they desire
Legitimacy: the norms and
values either at an individual
level, an organisation level or
level of society.
Urgency: time sensitive and critical demand immediate response.
Power
LegitimacyUrgency
Mitchell, Agle, and Wood, Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience, 1997
Stakeholder Attributes
Types of Stakeholders
Latent: one attribute1. Dormant
2. Discretionary
3. Demanding
Expectant: two attributes4. Dominant
5. Dangerous
6. Dependent
Highly salient: all attributes7. Definite
Non-stakeholders: none of the attributes
8. Non-stakeholder
Power
LegitimacyUrgency
Mitchell, Agle, and Wood, Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience, 1997
1
3 2
45
6
7
8
Stakeholder Attributes
Strategies
Power
• Direct and indirect withholding
• Resource building
Legitimacy
• Coalition building
• Conflict escalation
• Credibility building
Urgency
• Communication
• Direct action
Power
LegitimacyUrgency
Mitchell, Agle, and Wood, Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience, 1997
1
3 2
45
6
7
8
Where they
are now
Where we need
them in 4
months
Internalisation
ContactAwareness
Understanding
Acceptance
Commitment“I want to help make the implementation work”
1
2
3
4
5
6
Time
Level of C
om
mitm
ent
Where we
need them
in 2 months
“I want to know more about the programme”
“I’ve heard about the programme”
“I understand how this programme will affect me”
“It’s just the way we do things around here”
Engagement?
?
?
Commitment Curve
Commitment Curve
Daryl Connor, Commitment Model, 2006
David Merrill & Roger Reid, Personal Styles and Effective Performance, 1991
Personality Types
How to Engage Stakeholders
Identify
Prioritise
Visualise
Engage
Monitor
Stakeholder practice
Accuracy of
stakeholder
analysis
Time
Usual approach(At best)
Monthly reviews
Accuracy of
stakeholder
analysis
Time
Preferred approach
Good Practice Project Management
Reduced Risk
Reduced Schedule Slippage
Reduced Cost
Stakeholder Engagement Focus Group
‘Rules’ of
Thumb
Behavioural
PatternsCase
Studies
1. Communicate
2. Consult, early & often
3. They’re only human
4. Plan it!
5. Relationships are key
6. Simple, but not easy
7. Just part of managing risk
8. Compromise
9. Understand what success
is
10. Take responsibility
Key Principles(RICS/APM Guidance
Document)
Frequently asked Questions
https://www.apm.org.uk/resources/find-a-resource/stakeholder-engagement/
@apmsefg
click
Benedict Pinches
Founder and Director
Oxford Major Programmes
Phone: +44 (0) 7956 677 483
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @oxmp
Web: www.oxmp.co
Facebook: http://on.fb.me/PzavIu