Upload
terrya
View
734
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Slides from a 3 hour workshop on Web 2.0 and Formal education
Citation preview
Web 2.0 Meets Formal Learning
Terry Anderson, ProfessorCanada Research Chair in Distance
Education
Athabasca University, Alberta, Canada
* Athabasca University
Fastest growing university in Canada
34,000 students, 700 courses
100% distance education
Graduate and Undergraduate programs
Master & Doctorate – Distance Education
Only USA Regionally Accredited University in
Canada
*Athabasca University
Introduction
Terry Anderson’s CV in Wordle Tag Cloud
Web 2.0 Meets Formal Learning - Networked Learning Agenda
• Definitions and Theoretical Rationale• Social Networking Apps in Education:
– Social Networking– Social bookmarking – Blogs– Recommender systems– Collaborative work tools
• Net presence, security and identity
• "Today production, wealth and creation of surpluses take the form of cooperative interactivity through linguistic, communications and affective networks" Hardt and Negri, 2001 Empire p. 294
• Does learning or education also take place in networks??
• Fun• Connected• Time consuming• Public• Scary• Unreliable• Addicting• Creates Social Capital• Continuously changing• Filled with Learning• Filled with Schooling??
Life in a Net pervasive society is:
21st centurylearner/customer/patient
• Wants to learn things
• Continuously moves between on and offline
• Is learning to recognize and demand quality
in all transactions
• Knows there are many paths to learning and
healing
• Is used to staggering amounts of content
• Normally uses a wide set of information
processing, creation and communications
tools
• All types of information readily available, multimedia
• “universal multimedia library”
Web 1.0
• O’Rielly 2004• New platform for application development
– Interoperability– Rich internet applications– Web services– Users create the content – wikipedi, facebook,
flickr
Web 2.0
What is Social Media - Youtube
A Networked view of the Nature of Learning
• Social. Learning is a social process. Knowledge is an emergent property of interactions between networks of learners.
• Situated. Learning occurs within particular contexts. Both “learning and cognition...are fundamentally situated”,
• Reflective. Learners requires time to assimilate new information. Learners require the “opportunity to reflect on, defend, and share what they have learned
• Multi-faceted. Learning incorporates a range of theory, engagement, “tinkering” or bricolage, and active construction.
• From George Siemens
Is it just a Fad??
Webs
• Web 3.0 – the semantic web – the web understands itself, AI, inferences and reasoning
Networked Educational Computing
• Web 1.0 – the University home page, the learning management system
• Web 2.0 – Educational use of social networking (CitULike, RateMyProfessor, wikis, produseage)
• Web 3.0 – Adaptive learning, learning & subject ontologies
Steven Warburton, 200716
How Are LMS used?
From Mott & Wyley, 2009
Use by Brigham Young Faculty -2004-2009
Learning based on artificial time segements
Mott &Wiley (2009) http://ineducation.ca/article/open-learning-cms-and-open-learning-network
LMS Weaknesses
• Course focused• Teacher dominated• Removes students responsibility for their own
learning• Lacks persistence and student ownership• Rigid and hard to integrate tools outside of the
LMS package• Slow evolution and adaptation
Generations of Pedagogy (Anderson 2010)
1. First generation: Cognitive/behaviorist – correspondence packs, training, instructional design
Focus is on the Content and the Individual Learner
Behaviourist/Cognitive Knowledge Is
• Logically coherent, existing independent of perspective
• Context free• Capable of being transmitted• Assumes closed systems with discoverable
relationships between inputs and outputs
Behaviourist/Cognitive Technologies
Content is king
2nd Generation of Pedagogy
1. Constructivist2. Community of inquiry,3. Threaded discussions
Taxonomy of the ‘Many’ – A Conceptual Model
Dron and Anderson, 2007
GroupConscious membership
Leadership and organizationCohorts and paced
Rules and guidelinesAccess and privacy controls
Focused and often time limitedMay be blended F2F
Metaphor : Virtual classroom
25
Why Groups?• “Students who learn in small groups
generally demonstrate greater academic achievement, express more favorable attitudes toward learning, and persist …
• small-group learning may have particularly large effects on the academic achievement of members of underrepresented groups and the learning-related attitudes of women…” • Springer; Stanne, & Donovan, (1999) P.42
Constructivist Learning in Groups• Long history of research
and study• Established sets of tools
– Classrooms– Learning Management
Systems – Synchronous (video &
net conferencing)– Email
• Need to develop face to face, mediated and blended group learning skills
Garrison, R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105.
3. Generation Networked Learning using Connectivist Pedagogy
• Learning is building networks of information, contacts and resources that are applied to real problems.
Connectivist focuses on Networks - - not Groups
Group
NetworkShared interest/practice
Fluid membershipFriends of friends
Reputation and altruism drivenEmergent norms, structures
Activity ebbs and flowsRarely F2F
Metaphor: Virtual Community of Practice29
Dron and Anderson, 2007
Connectivist Knowledge is
• Emergent• Distributed• Chaotic• Fragmented• Non sequential• Contextualized
Connectivist Learning designs
Awareness and Receptivity
Connection formingSelectionFiltering
Contribution and Involvement
Reflection and Metacognition
Pettenati, & Cigognini(2007).
Connectivist Tools BecomePersonal Learning Networks
http://www.go2web20.net/
Network learning as Disruptive Technology
Clayton Christiansen – Innovator’s Dilemna
Adopting Disruptive Technologies
• Constant attention to where the “puck is going to be”
• Disruptive technologies may not be valued or provide advantage to existing customers
• “Products based on disruptive technologies are typically cheaper, simpler, smaller, and frequently more convenient to use” (Christensen, 1997).
• Bottom up disruptions - new providers using OER’s are most likely threat to established colleges
Adopting Disruptive Technologies
• Constant attention to where the “puck is going to be”
• Disruptive technologies may not be valued or provide advantage to existing customers
• Early adopters need support to customize web 2.0 solutions for local use
• Bottom up disruptions - new providers using OER’s are most likely threat to established colleges
Social Networking
• “web-based services that allow individuals to– construct a public or semi-public profile within a
bounded system, – articulate a list of other users with whom they
share a connection, and – view and traverse their list of connections and
those made by others within the system.”• Share, comment upon, evaluate and
recommend the resources of othersboyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1),
Functions of Social Networking in Education
• Connections beyond the course• Persistence and student ownership• Opportunities for social support and
collaborative work• Allow web 2.0 tools to operate outside of
firewalls• Network enhancement to alumni and
professionals in field
Does Social Networking Impair F2F social interaction?
• “Regression analyses conducted on results from a survey of
undergraduate students (N = 286) suggest a strong association between
use of Facebook and the three types of social capital, with the strongest
relationship being to bridging social capital.
• In addition, Facebook usage was found to interact with measures of
psychological well-being, suggesting that it might provide greater benefits
for users experiencing low self-esteem and low life satisfaction.”
Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Studentsí Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168
Access Controls in Elgg
An action Tour of Elgg
• Login to canuckelgg.org• Complete a profile• Join the Social Networking in Education Group• Post a blog or a bookmarked URL
Social Networking Options
• Facebook- External control, very popular, critcial mass, allows external apps.
• Ning – Host control, costs, • ELGG – Open Source, user hosted, many
plugins, active community, complex installation, weak e-portfolio
• Mahara – OS, user hosted, strong e-portfolio, weak social networking
• BuddyPress – Builds on OS Wordpress
Issues
• Internal or external hosting?• Open source or proprietary?• Technical support- internal or contracted?• Top down or bottom up designs
• Get out of
Patching on to the LMS
Your own Social Network
Open Net
Athabasca University
Athabasca Landing
E-PortfoliosProfilesNetworksBookmarksBlogs
Media lab
Secondlife campus
AUspace
AlFrescoCMS
Moodle
Library
Course Development
ELGG
MY AULogin
Registry
OERs, YouTUBE
DiscoveryRead & Comment
Single Sign on
CIDER
Research/Community Networks
Sample CC Course units and Branded OERs
PasswordsPasswords
http://www.mindmeister.com/48706364
Possible Social Networking Systems
Learning Applications of Web 2.0 Tools
Social Bookmarking
• Individual Management• Sharing• Tagging, ranking, commentating• Searching• Cloud tags• Subscriptions and feeds
• VERY easy collaborative web publishing
Wiki’s and collaborative editing
Syndication by email or RSS Feed – Pushes a
notification to you
Wikis (or Pages in Elgg)
• Educational Uses??
Why Blog?
Blogs
• “Results show that the main reasons for students not to keep a weblog include a preference for direct (online) communication, and concerns about the loss of privacy through blogging. Furthermore, the results indicate that intrinsic motivation factors keep students blogging, whereas stopping a weblog is mostly attributable to external factors. “
Weblogs in Higher Education–why do Students (not) Blog? 2009 ]M Andergassen, R Behringer, J Finlay, A Gorra
Task Management
• http://www.feedmyapp.com/web_20_project-management_applications_sites
Collaborative Work Applications
• Why does working at a distance always take longer??
• What tools do you use?– Google Docs– Wiki’s– Voice Thread?– Wiggio?
www.go2web20..net
Robin Goods Best tool Collection
• Go to http://www.mindmeister.com/12213323#• In pairs review types of collaborations tools
– Mind mapping– Doc Sharing– Work Group– Video conf.– Screen Sharing– Event Scheduling– Project Management– White Board
• Report back on a recommendation:
Mind and Concept Mapping• Concept maps make explicit relationships
between ideas
Cmap.imhs.us
Voice Thread – Multimedia, asynchronous interaction
http://voicethread.com/#q.b908650.i4836718
Collaborative Document Sharing
• Good Docs versus Wiki’s• Examples of Wiki use?• Examples of Google docs?• Examine the tools from Robin Good’s list
Work Groups
Synchronous Web conferencing• Why Pay for Elluminate or Connect, are these
tools – including Skype add ons just as good??
http://www.persony.com/quicktour/video_conf.jpghttp://www.persony.com/quicktour/video_conf.jpghttp://www.persony.com/quicktour/video_conf.jpg
Meeting Scheduling
Project Management
How does Twitter (Micro Blogging) help learning?
Pauschenwein, J., & Sfiri, A. (2010). Adult Learner Motivation for the Use of Micro-blogging during Online Training Courses.. http://online-journals.org/i-jet/article/view/1041.
Have you Tweeted events from this conference?
• Hash tag #ict2010• Why Not??
Twitter Educ Applications
• Class chatter• Building classroom community• Sensing the world• Track a word• Track a conference• Grammar use• Rule Based writing• Sharing • Building social capital http://academhack.outsidethetext.com/home/2008/twitter-for-academia/
• Does your institution use a social networking system?
• Is it inside or outside University control?• What do you see as the biggest
advantages/disadvantages of such systems?
Placing Boundaries on the Boundless
“Good fences make good neighbors” Robert Frost
Collectives, Privacy & Identity
• Best way to protect personal integrity is by creating a robust but realistic web presence.
• Your actions are being mined, best to be a miner rather than a lump of coal!
• Active social net users are more socially active and integrated than non users (Ellison, Steinfield, & Lampe, 2007)
• Use of Blogs reduces feelings of alienation and isolation among online learners (Dickey, 2004)
• When perceived interest and benefits increase, willingness to provide personal data increases (Dinev & Hart, 2006)
• Privacy Commisoner video• http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=X7gWEgHeXcA&feature=related
Clay Shirky on Privacy
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azIW1xjSTCo&feature=related
• Should everything online be accessible?
Additional Resources:
• http://docs.google.com/View?id=anw8wkk6fjc_92gbn7pwcp
• Access to data can be restricted, but often is not• “Of adolescent Web profiles:
47% - contained risk behavior information21% - described sexual activity; 25% - described alcohol use; 9% - described cigarette use; and 6% - described drug use. 97% - Contained personally identifying information: 74% included an
identifiable picture; 75% - included subjects' first names or surnames; and 78% - included subjects' hometowns” Moreno, Parks & Richardson (2007) , What are adolescents showing
the world about their health risk behaviors on MySpace?
Personal Exposure on Networking Sites:
Open Access Books
Upcoming Emerging Technologies in DE edited by George Veletsianowww.irrodl.org
"He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever.”
Chinese Proverb
Terry Anderson [email protected]
http://cde.athabascau.ca/faculty/terrya.php
Blog: terrya.edublogs.org
Your comments and questions most welcomed!