8
HRD Evaluation And Kirkpatrick's Model

Hrd..ppt

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Hrd..ppt

HRD Evaluation And Kirkpatrick's

Model

Page 2: Hrd..ppt

Evaluation begins with a clear identification of the purpose or results expected from the training programs.

It would be expected that training programs are based on important organizational goals and improvement efforts. However, that connection must be directly guiding training efforts if training results are to be linked to organizational measures.

HRD Evaluation

Page 3: Hrd..ppt

Determine whether a HRD program is accomplishing its objectives;

• Identify its strengths and weaknesses;

• Determine its cost-benefit ratio;

Decide who should participate in future HRD programs;

Purpose of HRD Evaluation

Page 4: Hrd..ppt

• Identify which participants benefited the most or least from the program;

• Reinforce major points to be made to the participants;

• Gather data to assist in marketing future programs; • Determine if the program was appropriate; • Establish a database to assist management in

making decisions.

Page 5: Hrd..ppt

Perhaps the best known evaluation methodology for judging learning processes is Donald Kirkpatrick's Four Level Evaluation Model that was first published in a series of articles in 1959 in the Journal of American Society of Training Directors.

Kirkpatrick’s Framework

Page 6: Hrd..ppt

ReactionLearningBehaviorResults

Kirkpatrick's Four Level Evaluation Model

Page 7: Hrd..ppt

Motivation, Not Reaction:  What do they need to perceive in order to learn and perform? 

Performance, Not Behavior:  What do the employees have to perform in order to create the desired impact?

Improving the Four Levels

Page 8: Hrd..ppt