12
BY KERRY SOWATSKY High-Stakes Standardized Testing Source

High-Stakes Standardized Testing: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Teaching to the Test

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: High-Stakes Standardized Testing: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Teaching to the Test

BYKERRY SOWATSKY

High-Stakes Standardized Testing

Source

Page 2: High-Stakes Standardized Testing: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Teaching to the Test

A Brief Introduction

MEAP

Teaching to the Test

Taking the fun out of learning?

Is it worth it?

Source

Page 3: High-Stakes Standardized Testing: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Teaching to the Test

What Is High-Stakes Testing?

A Test vs. High-Stakes Test

What are these decisions?

Wait, there’s more!

Page 4: High-Stakes Standardized Testing: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Teaching to the Test

Federal History

1980s President Reagan

1990s President George H.W. Bush President Clinton

2000s President George W. Bush

Page 5: High-Stakes Standardized Testing: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Teaching to the Test

Legislative History

“A Nation A Risk”

Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)

New ESEA No Child Left Behind

(NCLB)

“…the trajectory of education reforms into the 1990s was set, where forty-three states had statewide assessments for k-5 by 1994, and by the year 2000 every state but Iowa administered a state mandated test” -Au 

Page 6: High-Stakes Standardized Testing: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Teaching to the Test

No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

Centers on high-stakes testing

Emphasis on reading and math

Harsh consequences

Won’t be changes, as of now

Page 7: High-Stakes Standardized Testing: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Teaching to the Test

What Are Some Resulting Factors?

Classroom Control Curriculum Pedagogy

Social Studies “Disappearing subject”

Page 8: High-Stakes Standardized Testing: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Teaching to the Test

Impact on Literacy

“High-stakes standardized testing can greatly influence the teaching of reading and writing” (Higgins).

Writing is an ongoing process.

Better test scores?

Page 9: High-Stakes Standardized Testing: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Teaching to the Test

Opinions From The Field

Nothing will change anytime soon

Varying Good - Higgins Bad - Au

“…testing has become firmly entrenched as the policy tool, bar none, for federal enforcement of educational reforms.”-Au

Page 10: High-Stakes Standardized Testing: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Teaching to the Test

What’s The Bottom Line?

High-stakes Standardized Tests… Are accurate Teach students general

knowledge Are not all the same

Source

Page 11: High-Stakes Standardized Testing: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Teaching to the Test

References - Images

Source:http://www.flickr.com/photos/csessums/4405490016/ Author: cdsessums, File Name: Empty Classroom.jpg

Source:http://www.flickr.com/photos/anspach/63118519/ Author: Schnittke, File Name: Pencil.jpg

Source:http://www.flickr.com/photos/conspirator/31355171/Author:Conspirator, File Name: Hallway.jpg

Source:http://www.flickr.com/photos/pagedooley/2474926476/Author: kevindooley, File Name: Bus.jpg

Page 12: High-Stakes Standardized Testing: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Teaching to the Test

Resources – Works Cited

Au, Wayne. “Social Studies, Social Justice: W(h)ither the Social Studies in High-Stakes Testing?” Teacher Education

Quarterly 36.1 (2009). 43. Web. 16 February 2010.

Higgins, Betty, et. al. “Teaching to the Test…Not! Balancing Best Practice and Testing Requirement in Writing: High-Quality,

Evidence-Based Instruction Need Not Be Sacrificed in Preparing Students to Succeed on Standardized Writing Assignments.” The Reading Teacher 60.4 (2006). 310. Web. 16 February 2010.

“Testing High Stakes Tests: Can We Believe The Results of Accountability Tests?” Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Greene, Jay P. n.p. : February 2003. Web. 16 February 2010.