18
T Pasi SAHLBERG CIMO Helsinki FINLAND T witter: @ erg.com CIMO Helsinki FINLAND Educar en el siglo XXI: experiencias internacionales @pasi_sa asisahlbe experiencias internacionales Santander, SPAIN 2 July 2013 hlberg pa

Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

T

Pasi SAHLBERGCIMO Helsinki FINLAND

Twitter: @

erg.

com

CIMO ‐ Helsinki FINLAND

Educar en el siglo XXI: experiencias internacionales

@pasi_sa

asis

ahlb

e

experiencias internacionalesSantander, SPAIN

2 July 2013

hlbergpa

Page 2: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy
Page 3: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

Three things you need to know(1) Finland has never aimed to be the best

We will have the bestGreat school for We will have the best school system in the world 

by year 2020!

Great school for each and every 

child! y y

Page 4: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

Three things you need to know(2) Finland is one of the most equal countries

High

vemen

tent a

chiev .

Stud

e

Income inequality Wilkinson & Pickett, 2009OECD, 2102/2013

HighLow

Page 5: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

Three things you need to know(3) Finland does well overall

Economic competitivenessFinland #3

Technological AdvancementFinland #1 Global Equity Index

Finland #2

Corruption Perception IndexFinland #2

Global Innovation IndexFinland #4

Least Failed StateFinland #1Finland #2

The UN Happiness IndexChild Poverty Rate

Finland #1

Political Empowerment e U app ess deFinland #2

Child Poverty RateFinland 4%

Political Empowerment of WomenFinland #2

Child WellbeingFinland #4

Global Gender Gap IndexFinland #2

To be a MotherFinland #1

Page 6: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

Three things you need to know(3) Finland does well overall

Economic competitivenessFinland #3

United States #7

Technological AdvancementFinland #1

United States #9

Global Equity IndexFinland #2

United States #48United States #7

Corruption Perception IndexFinland #2

Global Innovation IndexFinland #4

United States #48

Least Failed StateFinland #1Finland #2

United States #24 United States #10

The UN Happiness IndexChild Poverty Rate

Finland #1United States #19

Political Empowerment e U app ess deFinland #2

United States #11

Child Poverty RateFinland 4%

United States 22%

Political Empowerment of WomenFinland #2

United States #55

Child WellbeingFinland #4

United States #26

Global Gender Gap IndexFinland #2

United States #22

United States #55

To be a MotherFinland #1

United States #26United States  #22United States #30

Page 7: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

How are school systems being i d?improved?

Page 8: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

Global Educational R f M tReform Movement

COMPETITION

STANDARDISATION

STANDARDISED TESTING

TOUGH ACCOUNTABILITY

SCHOOL CHOICE

Page 9: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

How does GERM look like in practice?

Page 10: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

GERM outbreak in 2013

Page 11: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

How successful GERM has been?

National averages of 15-year-old students learning outcomes in mathematics 2000-2009

2000 2003 2006 2009

540

560

520

540

480

500

460

420

440

USA England Canada Australia Japan New Zealand Netherlands Sweden Finland

Source: OECD

Page 12: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

How successful GERM has been?

National averages of 15-year-old students learning outcomes in mathematics 2000-2009

2000 2003 2006 2009

540

560

520

540

480

500

460

420

440

USA England Canada Australia Japan New Zealand Netherlands Sweden Finland

Source: OECD

Page 13: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

Global Educational R f M t

The FinnishWReform Movement Way

COLLABORATIONCOMPETITION

CUSTOMISATIONSTANDARDISATION

STANDARDISED TESTINGSAMPLE‐BASED ASSESSMENTSTRUST‐BASEDRESPONSIBILITYTOUGH ACCOUNTABILITY

EQUITYSCHOOL CHOICE

Page 14: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

Students’ performance in reading, mathematics and 

science (e.g. PISA) Equity and quality in educationHigh Performers’ Club

ality

Qu

reperec

Equity

Strength of telationship betrform

ance andconom

ic backgEquity  the tw

een d socio‐ground

Source: OECD

Page 15: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

Students’ performance in reading, mathematics and 

science (e.g. PISA) Equity and quality in educationHigh Performers’ Club

Fair school fundingFair school funding

Early childhood education

Early childhood education

Special needs education

Special needs educationBalanced 

curriculumBalanced curriculumTeacherTeacher

ality

Fair school fundingFair school funding curriculumcurriculumTeacher professionalism

Teacher professionalism

Qu

reperec

Equity

Strength of telationship betrform

ance andconom

ic backgEquity  the tw

een d socio‐ground

Source: OECD

Page 16: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

Lessons from Finland

Page 17: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

Finnish Lessons“Less testing more learning”Less testing, more learning

“More creativity, less standardisation”

“L f h i it ”“Less focus on choice, more on equity”

“Children must play”

Page 18: Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy

¡Gracias!

pasisahlberg.com Twitter: @pasi_sahlberg