34
1 Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D., The University of Texas at Austin W. Wesley Monroe, The University of Texas at Austin Jayce Warner, The University of Texas at Austin October 6, 2016

Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

1

Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D., The University of Texas at AustinW. Wesley Monroe, The University of Texas at AustinJayce Warner, The University of Texas at AustinKristin Anthony, Planview

October 6, 2016

Page 2: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

2

Overview of CS Education Landscape In Texas Preparing Teachers for CS Certification:

Face to Face Workshops Scaling the Program with a MOOC

Research Question Analysis Conclusions and Thoughts on Future Research

Page 3: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

3

All High Schools in Texas are Required to Offer CSCurriculum Requirement

Page 4: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

4

CS In Texas High Schools

What do you think these dots represent?

Page 5: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

5

CS In Texas High Schools

These high schools had no CS courseofferings in the 2014-2015 school year!

Page 6: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

6

CS In Texas High Schools

These high schools did have CS offeringsin 2014-15

Page 7: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

7

Only 2% of TX graduates take a CS course

CS Facts

Only 14 teachers completed a pre-service teacher certification program in CS in 2014-15.

Only 27% of TX high schools even offer a CS course

Page 8: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

8

WeTeach_CS Program Overview

Page 9: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

9

Teachers Must:pass a State administered test

covering 9 core competencies across 3 domains

Teacher Qualifications

Page 10: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

10

WeTeach_CS Certification Prep

Page 11: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

11

Online Course Design

1. Use pseudo code for coding examples.2. Create a Diagnostic Quiz at the start of the course to establish

current understanding.3. Gather base level information about teachers demographics,

experience and interest.4. Six week course with a weekly quiz at the end of each week.5. There must be a full practice exam at the end of the course.6. Use 80% as the passing grade: the same as required for the actual

certification exam.7. Spend more time on the more difficult topic areas.

Page 12: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

12

Online Course Design

Page 13: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

13

Teacher Demographics

Page 14: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

14

Teacher Demographics

Page 15: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

15

Teacher Demographics

Page 16: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

16

Teacher Demographics

Page 17: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

17

Research Questions

1. What background or contextual factors are related to the likelihood of getting certified to teach Computer Science?

Page 18: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

18

Research Questions

1. What background or contextual factors are related to the likelihood of getting certified to teach Computer Science?

2. How do the online, face-to-face and hybrid professional development formats compare in terms of the likelihood of participants getting certified in Computer Science?

Page 19: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

19

Hypothesized Factors Related to Success in Attaining Certification

We grouped the variables into 4 separate models inorder to test whether each model was related to obtaining CS certification above and beyond otherfactors:

1 – Education and Certification Background2 – Prior Experience and Interest in Programming3 – Connection to the CS Community4 – Type of Certification Prep Participation

Page 20: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

20

Hypothesized Factors Related to Success in Attaining Certification

Model 1 Education and Certification Background -

Hypothesis:Teachers with STEM, advanced degrees, orMath/Science/Tech Apps Certification might

bemore likely to get certified.

Page 21: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

21

Number ofParticipants

Hypothesized Factors Related to Success in Attaining Certification

Page 22: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

22

Model 2 Programming Background and Interest -

Hypothesis:Teachers with experience and interestin programming are more likely to get certified.

Hypothesized Factors Related to Success in Attaining Certification

Page 23: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

23

Hypothesized Factors Related to Success in Attaining Certification

Number ofParticipants

Experience and Interest in Programming

Page 24: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

24

Hypothesized Factors Related to Success in Attaining Certification

Number ofParticipants

Experience and Interest in Programming

X

Page 25: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

25

Model 3 Connection to the CS Community –

Hypothesis: The likelihood of getting certified is related towhether teachers are connected to the CScommunity or teach at a school that offers CS.

Hypothesized Factors Related to Success in Attaining Certification

CS

Page 26: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

26

Hypothesized Factors Related to Success in Attaining Certification

Number ofParticipants

Page 27: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

27

Model 4 Participation in Certification Prep -

Hypothesis:Teachers that participate in the

Certification Prep training are more likely to get certified.

Hypothesized Factors Related to Success in Attaining Certification

Page 28: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

28

Hypothesized Factors Related to Success in Attaining Certification

Page 29: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

29

Research Questions:

1. What background or contextual factors are related to the likelihood of getting certified to teach Computer Science?

Page 30: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

30

ConclusionsResearch Question 1:Participants were more likely to get certified if they:

• Had a current math certification• Had a STEM degree• Had an advanced degree• Had a connection to the CS community• CS was NOT offered at their school.

Page 31: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

31

ConclusionsResearch Question 1:We found no relationship between the following factors and obtaining CS certification.

• Science or technology apps certifications.• Teacher programming background.

Page 32: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

32

Research Questions:

1. What background or contextual factors are related to the likelihood of getting certified to teach Computer Science?

2. How do the online, face-to-face and hybrid professional development formats compare in terms of the likelihood of participants getting certified in Computer Science?

Page 33: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

33

ConclusionsResearch Question 2:

• Participation in any of the 3 PD models increased the likelihood of certification.

• There was no significant difference in the odds of getting certified between online and F2F models of PD.

• Participants who engaged in both online and F2F were more likely to get certified than those that only participated in one or the other alone.

Page 34: Comparing the Efficacy of Face to Face, MOOC and Hybrid Computer Science Teacher Professional Development

34

Limitations and Future Research

• Self-reporting of CS experience rather than objective diagnostic measure

• Insufficient data regarding PD and experience outside of WTCS

• Results are still coming in: participating teachers continue to obtain certification

• Have we accounted for all the important factors related to teacher motivation?