11
AUDIO-VISUAL LINKS CRITIQUE

Audio Visual link critique

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Audio Visual  link critique

AUDIO-VISUAL LINKS CRITIQUE

Page 2: Audio Visual  link critique

• Each of the links that were given a brief description, regarding what it contains and the link’s provider.

• All of the providers of the links were reliable and appropriate

• Some of the links did not have any intended purpose, specific year/grade level

• The subject content of some of the links were not given

• I suggest the owner of the list to make the link descriptions to be more specific, include the year levels that should use it and what specific subject areas can the links be used.

SHARMANE MAMARIL

Page 3: Audio Visual  link critique

ROME BORJA• The links focused on one cohesive

topic• The links’ descriptions were not

included, it would have been better if the owner of the list included a description for each link, such as what the links contained, what is the link’s purpose and who are the target learners of the links.

Page 4: Audio Visual  link critique

YSABELLE ENCINAS• Each of the links contained the

target year level it is intended for it also specified the topic

• It would have been a better list if the owner, included a description for each link, what is the purpose and what does each link provide

Page 5: Audio Visual  link critique

SAIYA DUMARAN• All of the links was from one website

(youtube)• Some of the links contained titles, but not

descriptions. While some of the links had no label at all

• The links, majority of them were stories, and contained no lessons

• The target grade level and purpose of the links were not mentioned

Page 6: Audio Visual  link critique

JUDIE RAMIREZ• The topic which the links contained were

included• The owner provided more than 10 links• The list of links contained one unified topic• The list could be improved if the owner of

the links will include the links’ purpose, target learners and what are the specific content

Page 7: Audio Visual  link critique

AMI MEJIA• The owner provided screenshots of

the links, giving the link’s format and actual web page

• The links’ description were not included.

• The target learners of the link was not included as well

Page 8: Audio Visual  link critique

THEA DELA TORRE• An overall description and reflection

for all of the links was provided by the owner

• Each of the links’ specific topic was not included

• Each of the links’ intended purpose was not mentioned

Page 9: Audio Visual  link critique

PATRICK CULTURA• The list of links provided contained

one cohesive topic• Each of the links’ topic was specified• The purpose and target learners were

not included• No description was provided

Page 10: Audio Visual  link critique

GRACELYN SARON• No description of any sort was given for

the links• The target learners were not mentioned

as well• The topic in the links was not mentioned

too.

Page 11: Audio Visual  link critique

GADNER SANITA• Each of the links’ topic and

content were specified.• The list could be improved by

providing a description of each link, it’s purpose and target learners