11
An alternative explanatory framework for what students want from feedback, what they actually use, and what tutors think they need Mark Carver, University of Cumbria. [email protected]

A model for feedback in teacher education

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

An alternative explanatory framework for what students want from feedback, what they

actually use, and what tutors think they needMark Carver, University of Cumbria.

[email protected]

• Why do we need another model?• What is special about feedback on teaching

practice?• What does the model look like?

• How does the model compare with alternatives?

Why an alternative?• “Feedback” absent from the conversation:

seen as “appraisal” or “assessment”• Ambiguous role of the learner, both student

and intern• Are HE models transferable?

Feedback on teaching practice

• Significant advantages: prompt, detailed, frequent, verbal and written, chances to immediately implement

• Or, idiosyncratic, relies on luck, fitting in, over-emphasises effort, complex personalised experience

with little generalisability to other placements

How would we describe this feedback narrative?

• http://youtu.be/zm4xkIqZ7CY

• Slideshare users: just advance to next slide to start the video

What is the gap?

• intent of feedback• Relationships and power

Model summaryAim: use a large dataset to create a generalisable model, a model which can help explain the rich experience of trainee teachers using feedback.

Strong explanatory power• Feedback with a learning focus• Importance of consistent hard work• Mentor-centric behaviours• Feedback with the trainee’s best

interests at heart• Feedforward

Moderate explanatory power Gender Missing items

Weak /no explanatory power Data collection method Year of study Trainee self-confidence Fitting into a school’s culture Perception of performance

Principal component analysis and multiple linear regression used on 35-item survey of 614 trainee teachers, resulting in eight main components of the feedback experience. Five of these components had explanatory power.

Summary: this model suggests significant benefits of dialogic approaches, which seek to address long-term learning goals. Even immediate assessment goals seem best served by this long-term approach. It is also vital that the mentor see the trainee as a learner and seek to help them meet their own goals rather than adopting goals from the mentor or school.

Download the full paper and more

• https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mark_Carver2

• Twitter: @themarkcarver• Audio of me presenting these slides: http://

1drv.ms/1HopBcB