Upload
sonia
View
104
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
To introduce and assess the expressiveness of a design space for trust-enabling interaction design.
Citation preview
Trust-enablingInteraction Design
Theoretical underpinnings
HCI perspective• How computing and computational artifacts relate to
the human condition.
Trust perspective• Social-technical aspects of trustful relationships
Human Computer Trust• Trust-enabling interactions
Intercept Human-Computer interactions with the dynamic nature of social-trust relationships
key principles
The ongoing cultural shift • The existing ever-widening range of digital artifacts is
transforming our daily lives.
How we relate to technology is• less and less about the… devices; and • more about the… activities.
Information technology context is• becoming pervasive; and
Computing is• becoming ubiquitous
Because...
Trust is...
• a key element in human relations.
With Trust...
• Actions are more decisive.
• Activities proceed more smoothly.
(e.g. Yan, 2010; Mcknight, 1996; Constantine, 2006, Preece, 2004)
(e.g. Coleman, 1988; Weber, 2003; Fukuyama, 1995; Luhmann, 2000; Gambetta, 1998)
Contextual aim
Trust contemplates• Social phenomena• A complex two-way relationship
Trust emerges from• An interpersonal organization• A specific social situation• A specific social context
• Positive experiences• Interactions• Active participation • Cooperative relations
SUPPORT&
SUSTAIN
Multidiciplinary • Multiple interpretations
Research include areas such as…• Sociology (Good, 2000), • Political science (Fukuyama, 1995; Luhmann, 2000); • Economics (Dasgupta, 2000); • Socio-biology (Batenson, 1998); • Cognitive science (Bachrach, 2001); • Computer sciences (McKnight, 2002); and even • Education (Hoy, 2003).
Contextual aim
Trust notions (social science)
Trust notions (Computer science)
Computer science perspectives • Separates the trust concept in 2 distinct domain
definitions:
operational and internal
Contextual aim
Trusting represents• A reinsurance element
Trusting comes associated • With certain properties that help to support users
intended behaviours
Trusting relies on• The identification of trustworthy making qualities
How to determine if a situation is in fact
trustworthy?
By observing the trust warranty signs
Bacharach et. al., 2007
The research contemplates
A need for identify
1. Trust social values (qualities) that underlies people’s trust beliefs
2. The reliability of those trustworthy making qualities
3. How those (trustworthy making qualities) are represented in today’s ongoing cultural shift
Results (associated notions)
Trusting is…• process of believing in others behaviours
Reflects a • risk
While some are more willing to take the risks others don’t
Level of commitment of
both parts
Strong incentives to believe that
determinate person, service or tool is in
fact trustworthy
Human Computer Trust model
Predominant factors
Refections
Trust-enabling interactions systems include qualities like:
• Enables more honest & transparent behaviours• Facilitates the... Prediction of others activities patterns • Enables the perception of others competencies• Creates/supports emphatic relations which, fosters
Social engagement• Diminish group hostility which, increase group
commitment • Foster group motivation & willingness to cooperate
Design spaceA method to evaluate trust-enabling interaction design qualities
UsefulnessArtifact-centered Value-centered
This toolset provides designers lenses to
• Assess the act of design for trust-enable interactions; and
• Evaluate if their design propositions have been reflected in the design outcome.
Critical design
Reflect on values Understand the
design options Evaluate the
design propositions
Example
Thank you!