University of Groningen
Survivorship care after testicular cancerBoer, Hindrik
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.
Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date:2019
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):Boer, H. (2019). Survivorship care after testicular cancer: New insights in late effects of treatment andapproaches to shared-care follow-up. [Groningen]: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
Download date: 20-04-2020
89
Vascular fingerprint and vascular damage markers associated with vascular events
in testicular cancer patients during and after chemotherapy
Chapter 5
5
S. Lubberts1, H. Boer1, R. Altena1, C. Meijer1, A.M. van Roon2, N. Zwart1, S.F. Oosting1, P.W. Kamphuisen2, J. Nuver1, A.J. Smit2, A.B. Mulder3, J.D. Lefrandt2, J.A. Gietema1
Author affi liations: Departments of
1Medical Oncology, 2Vascular Medicine and
3Laboratory Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
European Journal of Cancer. 2016; 63: 180-188
90
Abstract
BackgroundMetastatic testicular cancer (TC) can be cured with bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy. This comes at the price of an increased cardiovascular disease risk, not only years afterwards, but also during and shortly after chemotherapy. To prevent cardiovascular events, high-risk patients should be identified. Aim of this study was to assess BEP-chemotherapy induced vascular damage and to find risk factors for early vascular events.
Patients and methods A prospective cohort study was performed in (B)EP treated TC patients. Development of venous and arterial vascular events was assessed. Vascular damage markers (vWF, FVIII, IMT) and cardiovascular risk factors were assessed before and until 1 year after chemotherapy. Before start of chemotherapy a vascular fingerprint was estimated. Presence of ≥3 risk factors was defined as high-risk vascular fingerprint: BMI>25 kg/m2, current smoking, blood pressure>140/90 mmHg, total cholesterol>5.1 and/or LDL>2.5 mmol/L or glucose≥7 mmol/L.
ResultsSeventy-three patients were included. Eight (11%) developed vascular events (4 arterial events, 4 pulmonary embolisms). VWF and FVIII increased during chemotherapy, especially in patients with vascular events. Sixteen patients (22%) had a high-risk vascular fingerprint before start of chemotherapy. These patients had arterial events more often (3/16(19%) vs. 1/57(2%);p=0.031) and higher vWF levels and IMT.
ConclusionsEndothelial activation and upregulation of procoagulant activity seem important mechanisms involved in early (B)EP-chemotherapy-induced vascular events. Before chemotherapy, a quarter already had cardiovascular risk factors. A vascular fingerprint could identify patients at risk for arterial events. This vascular fingerprint, when validated, can be used as a tool to select patients who may benefit from preventive strategies.
Chapter 5
91
Introduction
Since the introduction of platinum-based chemotherapy in 1977, the prognosis of metastatic testicular cancer (TC) improved remarkably, with survival rates of 80-90%.1 Treatment consists of orchidectomy followed by bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) combination chemotherapy.2 However, cure rates are compromised by the increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) both during or shortly after treatment (acute onset)3,4 as well as years after treatment (late onset).5,6
The pathophysiology is not fully understood, and probably differs between acute and late CVD onset. One of the contributing factors for both types appears to be occurrence of endothelial dysfunction7, which can occur either as a direct chemotherapy effect or can be mediated by development of cardiovascular risk factors; TC survivorship is generally associated with an unfavorable cardiovascular risk profile.8,9
That early onset CVD is a source of serious treatment-induced morbidity and mortality was recently confirmed by Fung et al10. If high-risk patients could be identified before start of chemotherapy, preventive strategies for this group can be explored to prevent early cardiovascular events.Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess BEP-chemotherapy-induced (subclinical) vascular damage and to find clues to identify patients at risk for early vascular events. To assess vascular damage we prospectively measured different markers for subclinical vascular damage and cardiovascular risk factors. We looked into the relationship of these markers and risk factors with development of both arterial and venous vascular events.
Methods
PatientsWe performed a prospective cohort study in metastatic TC patients, aged 18-50 years, treated with first-line (B)EP chemotherapy in the University Medical Center of Groningen, the Netherlands. Exclusion criteria were previous chemo-/radiotherapy, previous vascular events, erythropoietin use or glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min. The ethics committee approved this study. All participants gave written informed consent. Patients received three or four (B)EP courses (etoposide 100 mg/m2, days 1-5, cisplatin 20 mg/m2, days 1-5, with/without bleomycin 30 USP, days 2, 8, 15) every three weeks and were during the first 6 days of every course hydrated with 4L saline per 24h. They received dexamethasone and ondansetron as antiemetics. Vascular events of both arterial and venous origin (WHO ICD-10 I1-I99) were included as possible events. Symptomatic as well as asymptomatic vascular events (discovered on staging CT scans) which developed after start of chemotherapy until two years afterwards were taken into account.The Khorana score, risk prediction model for venous thrombosis18, was assessed for every patient before start of chemotherapy.
Vascular damage markers in testicular cancer patients during and after chemotherapy
92
Plasma biomarkersVon Willebrand Factor (vWF) was measured in citrated plasma as described earlier.4 Coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) was measured in stored citrated plasma (-80 oC) using an automatic hemostasis testing system (ACL TOP 500, IL, the Netherlands), measuring APTT and using FVIII deficient plasma (SynthASil kit, IL, the Netherlands). Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) were measured in citrated plasma as described previously [4]. Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15; Human GDF-15 Quantikine ELISA kit (R&D Systems, USA)) and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP; BNII Nephelometer (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics BV, the Netherlands)) were measured in stored EDTA plasma (-20 oC).
Intima media thickness (IMT)Posterior wall IMT of the right common carotid artery was measured using an ultrasound device, as described earlier.4 The highest value from three measurements was recorded; maximal IMT best reflects atherosclerotic burden and cardiovascular risk.11,12 High IMT was defined as >97.5th age-specific percentile of healthy males.13
Oxidative stress memory: advanced glycation end products (AGEs)AGEs were determined in triplicate by measuring skin autofluorescence at the right lower arm with the AGE-reader (DiagnOptics Technology BV, the Netherlands).14 Measurements with a variation coefficient >12% or low reflection (R<0.07) were excluded.
Cardiovascular risk factors and the vascular fingerprintWeight, height, waist/hip circumference and blood pressure (sphygmomanometer) were measured. Current smoking behavior was recorded. In fasting blood samples, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides, total cholesterol and glucose levels were measured. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the NCEP.15 Cardiovascular risk was calculated using the European standard model (SCORE).16 However, the SCORE model was not an useful instrument: because of their young age, every patient had the same low 10-year CVD risk. Therefore, we explored which risk factors were needed to modify the SCORE model in our aim to identify high-risk patients, and compiled a vascular fingerprint of five risk factors prevalent in TC patients/survivors9,17: overweight, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia and impaired fasting glucose. We used generally accepted cut-off values: BMI >25 kg/m2, current smoking, blood pressure >140/90 mmHg (or using antihypertensive drugs), dyslipidemia (total cholesterol >5.1 mmol/L, LDL >2.5 mmol/L or using lipid lowering drugs), fasting glucose ≥7 mmol/L (or using blood glucose lowering drugs). A high-risk vascular fingerprint was defined as ≥3 risk factors before start of chemotherapy.
Timing of study-related investigationsIMT, AGEs and cardiovascular risk factors were measured before start, one month after completion and one year after start of chemotherapy. Plasma biomarkers were measured at the same time points and additionally 1-2 weeks after start of the third chemotherapy course.
Chapter 5
93
StatisticsData are presented as medians with ranges. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for paired measurements. For comparisons between groups a Mann-Whitney U or Chi- Square test (expected counts <5: Fisher Exact test) was applied, as appropriate. Two- sided P-values <0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS Statistics 22.0 (IBM SPSS inc, USA). With the 73 patients, 85% power (α=0.05) was reached to detect an IMT difference of 180 μm (SD:160 μm)13 between patients with (n=8) and without events (n=65).
Figure 1. Patient accrual. Between May 2006 and June 2012, 78 consecutive patients were included of which 73 were eligible for analysis.
Results
PatientsSeventy-three consecutive patients were available for analysis (Figure 1). Characteristics are described in Table 1. Eight patients (11%) developed vascular events (4 arterial, 4 venous) (Supplementary table 1). Arterial events were a stroke, renal infarction, splenic infarction and one patient had both a stroke and renal infarction. All venous events were pulmonary embolisms, three were asymptomatic and discovered on CT-scans. Patients with vascular events were older (median 38 vs. 30 years (Table 2)). The known risk factors an elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level as well as the Khorana score18,19 did not differ between patients with and without events (data not shown).
Vascular damage markers in testicular cancer patients during and after chemotherapy
94
Table 1. Patient characteristics (n=73)
Chapter 5
Tables chapter 5
Table 1. Patient characteristics (n=73).
n/median %/range Age at start of chemotherapy, years 30 18 – 46 Histological diagnosis Non-seminoma 59 81 Seminoma 14 19 Disease stage Stage II 57 78 Stage III 7 10 Stage IV 9 12 IGCCCG prognosis group Good 61 84 Intermediate 11 15 Poor 1 1 Chemotherapy regimen 3 cycles BEP 53 73 4 cycles BEP 13 18 4 cycles EP 3 4 4 cycles BEP/EP combination 4 5 RPLND Before (B)EP 1 1 After (B)EP 34 47
Follow-up duration, months 33 5 – 89
Oncological status at last follow-up No evidence of testicular cancer 67 92 Refractory on (B)EP* 1 1 Death due to testicular cancer 1 1 Recurrent testicular cancer * 4 6 IGCCCG: international germ cell cancer collaborative group; RPLND: retroperitoneal lymph node dissection; BEP: bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin containing chemotherapy; EP: etoposide and cisplatin containing chemotherapy. * These patients received TIP-chemotherapy (paclitaxel, iphosphamide and cisplatin) as second-line treatment.
IGCCCG: international germ cell cancer collaborative group; RPLND: retroperitoneal lymph node dissection; BEP: bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin containing chemotherapy; EP: etoposide and cisplatin containing chemotherapy.
* These patients received TIP-chemotherapy (paclitaxel, iphosphamide and cisplatin) as second-line treatment.
95
Table 2 . Differences in vascular damage markers and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with versus patients without vascular events
vWF: von Willebrand Factor; FVIII: coagulation factor VIII; IMT: intima glycation end products; BMI: body mass index.
*Mann Whitney U test / Fisher exact test. *** significance disappeared after correction for age. ¶ IMT above the 97.5th percentile of an age-matched male reference group from literature13. ̂ Hypertension is defined as a systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive drugs. ** Dyslipidemia is defined as a fasting total cholesterol >5.1 mmol/L, LDL >2.5 mmol/L, HDL < 1.04 mmol/L, ratio total cholesterol/HDL >5 and/or triglycerides >4.5 mmol/L or use of lipid lowering medication.
Vascular damage markers in testicular cancer patients during and after chemotherapy
96
Diabetes mellitus is defined as a fasting glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L or use of blood glucose lowering medication. � Metabolic syndrome is defined according to the NCEP ATP III definition update in 2005 in which three or more of the following factors have to be present: waist circumference ≥102 cm, triglycerides ≥1.7 mmol/L, HDL cholesterol <1.03 mmol/L or use of lipid lowering medication, blood pressure ≥130/85 mmHg or use of antihypertensive drugs, fasting glucose ≥5.6 mmol/L or use of blood glucose lowering medication. Patients with a BMI >30 kg/m2 with an unknown waist circumference were considered to have abdominal obesity and therefore scored as one point for increased waist circumference.
Plasma biomarkersPatterns of biomarker levels are shown in Table 3.Before chemotherapy, 12% had a high vWF level (>150%). Pre-chemotherapy high vWF did not predict for vascular events. Patients with vascular events had higher vWF levels during chemotherapy and one month afterwards compared to patients without vascular events (Figure 2, Table 2).Six patients had an elevated FVIII level (>150%) (n=6/71, 8%) before chemotherapy of whom three (n=3/6, 50%) developed vascular events versus five patients (n=5/65, 8%) with FVIII ≤150% (p=0.017). Patients with vascular events had higher FVIII levels pre-chemotherapy, during chemotherapy and one month afterwards compared to patients without vascular events (Figure 2, Table 2).PAI-1, t-PA, PAI-1/t-PA ratio, GDF-15, and hs-CRP were not associated with the observed vascular events.
IMTIn five out of the 73 patients (7%) no successful IMT measurement was performed before start of chemotherapy due to logistic or technical reasons. Of these 68 evaluable patients, 21 (31%) had a high IMT at start of chemotherapy. Three of the 21 (14%) developed arterial events, compared to none in the remaining 47 patients (p=0.027). Overall, IMT did not change in the first year after chemotherapy (Table 4). Absolute IMT and IMT changes were, after correction for age, not different in patients who developed vascular events (Table 2).
AGEsThe amount of AGEs did not change during the first year after treatment (Table 3). There were no differences in patients with vascular events compared to those without vascular events (Table 2).
Chapter 5
97
Tabl
e 3.
Vas
cula
r mar
kers
bef
ore,
dur
ing
and
afte
r che
mot
hera
py.
vWF:
von
Will
ebra
nd F
acto
r; FV
III: c
oagu
latio
n fa
ctor
VIII
; PAI
-1: p
lasm
inog
en a
ctiv
ator
inhi
bito
r 1; t
-PA:
tiss
ue p
lasm
inog
en a
ctiv
ator
; GD
F-15
: gro
wth
diff
eren
tiatio
n fa
ctor
15;
hs
-CRP
: hig
h-se
nsiti
vity
C-re
activ
e pr
otei
n; IM
T: in
tima
med
ia th
ickn
ess;
AGEs
: adv
ance
d gl
ycat
ion
end
prod
ucts
; BM
I: bod
y mas
s ind
ex.
*: sig
nific
antly
diff
eren
t fro
m m
easu
rem
ent b
efor
e st
art o
f che
mot
hera
py.
Be
fore
star
t of
chem
othe
rapy
Dur
ing
3th
cour
se o
f ch
emot
hera
py
O
ne m
onth
aft
er
chem
othe
rapy
One
yea
r aft
er
chem
othe
rapy
med
ian/
n ra
nge/
%
m
edia
n/n
rang
e/%
med
ian/
n ra
nge/
%
m
edia
n/n
rang
e/%
Pl
asm
a bi
omar
kers
vW
F, %
98
42
-297
160*
51
-379
124*
54
-249
111*
44
-237
FV
III, %
10
0 49
-162
152*
55
-342
118*
73
-192
123*
34
-197
PA
I-1, µ
g/l
28
2-14
3
14*
5-48
27
6-12
6
21*
8-66
t-P
A, µ
g/l
8 4-
19
7*
3-
16
9*
4-
28
9*
4-
20
PA
I-1/t
-PA
ratio
3.
7 1.
0-12
.5
2.
0*
0.8-
7.5
3.
3*
0.6-
12.6
2.6*
0.
7-5.
9
GD
F-15
, pg/
ml
394
187-
1935
5342
* 14
39-1
8959
865*
29
9-47
37
38
2*
247-
981
hs
-CRP
, mg/
L 1.
3 0.
2-50
.4
0.
5*
0.2-
132.
0
2.2
0.3-
29.1
1.5
0.2-
15.1
IM
T, µ
m
586
435-
1097
586
420-
1065
600
400-
1037
AG
Es, A
U 1.
60
1.03
-2.7
0
1.56
0.
99-2
.28
1.
59
1.17
-2.5
1
Card
iova
scul
ar ri
sk fa
ctor
s
Curre
nt sm
oker
20
/73
27
10
/70
14
16
/65
25
O
verw
eigh
t (BM
I >25
kg/
m2 )
41/7
3 56
43/6
9 62
36/6
6 55
Obe
sity
(BM
I >30
kg/
m2 )
14/7
3 19
17/6
9 25
13/6
7 19
Hype
rtens
ion^
14/6
0 23
7/66
* 11
7/65
11
Dys
lipid
emia
**
57/7
0 81
59/7
1 83
54/6
5 83
Dia
bete
s mel
litus
‡ 2/
68
3
3/71
4
2/
61
3
Met
abol
ic sy
ndro
me
□ 14
/62
23
18
/69
26
11
/65
17
Tabl
e 3.
Vas
cula
r mar
kers
bef
ore,
dur
ing
and
afte
r che
mot
hera
py
vWF:
von
Wille
bran
d Fa
ctor
; FVI
II: co
agul
atio
n fa
ctor
VIII
; PAI
-1: p
lasm
inog
en a
ctiva
tor i
nhib
itor 1
; t-P
A: d
iffer
entia
tion
fact
or 1
5; h
s-CR
P: h
igh-
sens
itivi
ty C
-reac
tive
prot
ein;
IMT:
intim
a m
edia
thick
ness
; AGE
s: m
ass i
ndex
.tis
sue p
lasm
inog
en a
ctiva
tor;
GDF-
15: g
row
th a
dvan
ced
glyc
atio
n en
d pr
oduc
ts; B
MI: b
ody
*: sig
nific
antly
diff
eren
t fro
m m
easu
rem
ent b
efor
e sta
rt of
chem
othe
rapy
.^
Hype
rtens
ion
is de
fined
as a
syst
olic
bloo
d pr
essu
re >
140
mm
Hg a
nd/o
r a d
iast
olic
bloo
d pr
essu
re >
90 m
mHg
or u
se o
f ant
ihyp
erte
nsive
dru
gs. *
* Dys
lipid
emia
is d
efine
d as
a
fast
ing
tota
l cho
lest
erol
>5.
1 m
mol
/L, L
DL >
2.5
mm
ol/L
, HD
L < 1
.04
mm
ol/L
, rat
io to
tal c
hole
ster
ol/H
DL >
5 an
d/or
trig
lycer
ides
>4.
5 m
mol
/L o
r use
of l
ipid
low
erin
g m
edica
tion.
‡
Dia
bete
s mel
litus
is d
efine
d as
a fa
stin
g gl
ucos
e ≥7.
0 m
mol
/L o
r use
of b
lood
glu
cose
low
erin
g m
edica
tion.
� M
etab
olic
synd
rom
e is d
efine
d ac
cord
ing
to th
e NCE
P AT
P III
defi
nitio
n up
date
in 2
005
in w
hich
thre
e or m
ore o
f the
follo
win
g fa
ctor
s hav
e to
be p
rese
nt: w
aist
circ
umfe
renc
e ≥10
2 cm
, trig
lycer
ides
≥1.
7 m
mol
/L, H
DL c
hole
ster
ol <
1.03
mm
ol/L
or u
se o
f lip
id lo
wer
ing
med
icatio
n, b
lood
pre
ssur
e ≥13
0/85
mm
Hg o
r use
of a
ntih
yper
tens
ive d
rugs
, fast
ing
gluc
ose ≥
5.6
mm
ol/L
or u
se o
f blo
od g
luco
se lo
wer
ing
med
icatio
n. Pa
tient
s with
a
BMI >
30 kg
/m2
with
an
unkn
own
wai
st ci
rcum
fere
nce w
ere c
onsid
ered
to h
ave a
bdom
inal
obe
sity a
nd th
eref
ore s
core
d as
one
poi
nt fo
r inc
reas
ed w
aist
circ
umfe
renc
e.
98
Cardiovascular risk factors and the vascular fingerprintBefore start of chemotherapy, the most common risk factors were dyslipidemia (81%) and overweight (56%). Twenty-three percent had the metabolic syndrome (Table 3). Separate risk factors and the metabolic syndrome were equally present in patients with and without vascular events (Table 2). Sixteen patients (22%) had a high-risk vascular fingerprint, these patients developed arterial events more often (n=3/16 (19%) vs. 1/57 (2%); p=0.031) (Table 4). Prevalence of risk factors did not change in the first year after chemotherapy, except for a decreased prevalence of hypertension (p=0.021) (Table 3). Detected risk factors at start of chemotherapy were not treated.
The 16 patients with a high-risk vascular fingerprint had a higher IMT, higher vWF levels, FVIII levels more often >150% and higher AGEs before chemotherapy (Figure 2, Table 4). Adding pre-chemotherapy FVIII >150% as risk factor to the vascular fingerprint, defining presence of ≥3 out of 6 risk factors as high-risk, led to detection of all arterial events: 18 patients (n=18/71, 25%) had a high-risk vascular fingerprint with FVIII added, of whom 4 (n=4/18, 22%) developed arterial events, compared to no arterial events in the 53 patients without high-risk vascular fingerprint (p=0.003).
Persistently high vWF and FVIIIAfter one year, 29% still had high vWF and/or FVIII (>150%). These patients already had higher vWF and FVIII levels pre-chemotherapy (vWF: median 136% (range:84-219) vs. 82% (range:42-297); p<.001 and FVIII: median 123% (range:56-162) vs. 93% (range:49-152); p=0.001) and during chemotherapy and were older (Supplementary table 2).
Chapter 5
99
Figu
re2.
vWF
and
FVIII
leve
ls in
pat
ient
s with
vers
us w
ithou
t hig
h-ris
k va
scul
ar fi
nger
prin
t. Th
e re
d lin
es re
pres
ent p
atie
nts w
ith a
rter
ial v
ascu
lar e
vent
s, th
e bl
ue lin
es re
pres
ent p
atie
nts w
ith ve
nous
vasc
ular
even
ts. N
umbe
rs co
rresp
ond
with
the n
umbe
rs in
the l
eft c
olum
n of
Sup
plem
enta
ry Ta
ble 1
. The
gre
y are
a re
pres
ents
refe
renc
es va
lues
. Erro
r bar
s rep
rese
nt m
edia
ns w
ith in
terq
uart
ile ra
nges
. vW
F, vo
n W
illeb
rand
fact
or; F
VIII,
coag
ulat
ion
fact
or V
III; B
EP, b
leom
ycin
, et
opos
ide
and
cisp
latin
100
Supplementary table 2. Patients with persistently high vWF and/or FVIII after one year versus patients with normalized vWF and FVIII after one year (n=65 patients with measured plasma biomarkers after one year).
vWF and/or FVIII >150%
after one year n=19
Normalized vWF and VIII
after one year n=46
median/n range/% median/n range/% p*
Age at start of chemotherapy, years 36 25-45 30 18-46 .011
Cisplatin dose, mg/m2 300 300-700 300 300-400 .895 Biomarkers during 3th course vWF, % 203 144-379 142 51-276 <.001 FVIII, % 173 79-249 143 55-277 .004 PAI-1, µg/l 16 7-37 13 6-48 .416 t-PA, µg/l 9 5-16 7 3-16 .066 PAI-1/t-PA ratio 2.0 0.8-6.9 2.1 0.8-7.5 .493 GDF-15, pg/ml 5500 2475-14400 5235 3060-18959 .880 Hs-CRP, mg/L 0.7 0.2-132.0 0.4 0.2-9.6 .110 IMT change between start and one year after chemotherapy, µm 83 -31-300 3 -300-317 .181 Pre-chemotherapy high-risk vascular fingerprint 5 26 9 20 .418
vWF: von Willebrand Factor; FVIII: coagulation factor VIII; CT: chemotherapy; PAI-1: plasminogen activator inhibitor 1; t-PA: tissue plasminogen activator; GDF-15: growth differentiation factor 15; hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IMT: intima media thickness. *Mann Whitney U test / Fisher exact test.
Table 4 . Patients with versus patients without high-risk vascular fingerprint before start of chemotherapy
vWF: von Willebrand Factor; FVIII: coagulation advanced glycation end products.
*Mann Whitney U test / Fisher exact test.
Discussion
This study shows that (B)EP chemotherapy for metastatic TC induces endothelial activation and procoagulant activity. Both mechanisms were related to development of early vascular events. It also turned out that about a quarter of the TC patients already carries cardiovascular risk factors at start of chemotherapy. The vascular fingerprint combines these risk factors. Metastatic TC patients with a high-risk vascular fingerprint before start of (B)EP chemotherapy developed arterial vascular events more often (19% vs. 2%).
During chemotherapy a clear upregulation of endothelial activation (vWF) and a procoagulant effect (FVIII, PAI-1/t-PA ratio) was seen. The PAI-1/t-PA ratio decrease indicates a tumor-related pro-thrombotic state before start and fibrinolysis during chemotherapy. GDF-15 levels increased 13-fold during treatment, which is partly explained by GDF-15 being an apoptosis marker20, but the pattern does not suggest a relationship with cancer activity. GDF-15 is also known to participate in vascular pathological processes.21 In a preclinical model for chemotherapy-induced endothelial damage its genes were highly upregulated22. GDF-15 thus seems to reflect endothelial activation during chemotherapy. However, since all patients showed an increase, its distinguishing value is limited. Hs-CRP levels fell during treatment, correlating with dexamethasone administration.
Chapter 5
101
VWF and FVIII levels were higher in patients with vascular events, strongly suggesting that endothelial activation and procoagulant activity are part of underlying mechanisms behind early onset vascular disease. The only pre-chemotherapy biomarker related to vascular events was FVIII>150%. During and one month after chemotherapy, both vWF and FVIII were higher in patients with vascular events. The course of VWF and FVIII therefore can also be helpful in detecting high-risk patients. VWF is a known predictor for arterial events in the general population23 and FVIII has earlier been shown to be related to venous events in cancer patients.24 Both vWF and FVIII were not associated with venous events only in this TC cohort. Venous events probably have a different pathophysiology. Known risk factors are venous access devices, retroperitoneal tumor mass size, high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and a high Khorana score.18, 19, 25 In our study, none of the patients with vascular events had venous access devices. Retroperitoneal masses, if any, were of limited size . LDH levels were not different in patients with or without vascular events. The Khorana score was not different between patients with or without vascular events.
IMT did not change in the first year after chemotherapy. In the male general population an increase of 5.2 μm/year is estimated.13 As inter-measurement variability is 5-10% [26], one year seems too short to observe IMT changes. A remarkable finding was that 31% had at start of chemotherapy a high IMT compared to age-matched peers from the healthy male group of a large Dutch cohort (n=1993).13 These patients developed more often arterial vascular events. Furthermore, a large part of the patients had cardiovascular risk factors before start of chemotherapy. Not only TC survivorship is thus associated with an unfavorable cardiovascular risk profile: at start of chemotherapy about a quarter of the patients seem already prone to development of CVD. Presence of cardiovascular risk factors did not change within the first year after chemotherapy, except for blood pressure. The higher blood pressure before start of chemotherapy is consistent with earlier findings4 and is probably related to stress of the recent cancer diagnosis and oncology ward admission.
The recent study of Fung et al. shows excess CVD deaths in the first year after chemotherapy for TC10. This underlines the importance of identifying high-risk patients before start of treatment, as standard application of prevention strategies also carries risk. We provide the vascular fingerprint as an easy tool to identify high-risk patients. The vascular fingerprint consists of traditional cardiovascular risk factors: overweight, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia and impaired fasting glucose. Patients with ≥3 risk factors were considered to have a high-risk vascular fingerprint (n=16, 22%). Adding pre-chemotherapy FVIII>150% as risk factor to the vascular fingerprint led to detection of all arterial events. Main differences with the metabolic syndrome –which was not associated with early onset vascular events– are the addition of smoking behavior and a more rigorous cut-off for overweight. The TC population is relatively young, it is assumable that a BMI of 25-30 kg/m2 is an additional risk factor.
The vascular fingerprint appears to pinpoint TC patients at increased risk for early onset arterial vascular events. The metabolic syndrome is more likely involved in late onset atherosclerotic
Vascular damage markers in testicular cancer patients during and after chemotherapy
102
CVD, because its definition is based on insulin resistance eventually leading to atherosclerosis.27 Although results are statistically significant and the vascular fingerprint is supported by known vascular damage markers (vWF, FVIII, IMT and AGEs), the current data especially are hypothesis-generating. Therefore a validation study is needed to test the performance of this selection tool in an independent larger cohort with newly diagnosed disseminated TC patients requiring cisplatin combination chemotherapy (validation study: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02573584). When validated, intervention trials should be initiated in which TC patients with a high-risk vascular fingerprint before start of chemotherapy are randomized for a prophylactic intervention, for example with LMWHs.
One year after chemotherapy, 29% had a high vWF and/or FVIII level. These patients also had higher vWF and FVIII levels before start and during chemotherapy. This persistent vascular activation status possibly contributes to late onset CVD, in which the accelerated atherosclerotic phenotype plays a role. However, longer follow-up is needed to determine this effect. When this is done and the data available, possible intervention strategies could be explored but for now, these patients should be monitored closely during follow-up.
In conclusion, endothelial activation and increased procoagulant activity are important underlying mechanisms involved in the development of vascular events during and shortly after chemotherapy. Before start of chemotherapy, about a quarter of the TC patients already has an increased CVD risk, as demonstrated by presence of cardiovascular risk factors and a high IMT. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were clustered in a pre-chemotherapy vascular fingerprint. This vascular fingerprint, when validated, can be used as a tool to select patients who may benefit from preventive strategies.
FundingThis work was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (grant 2009-4365). The funding source had no role in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data and also no role in writing this manuscript.
DisclosuresAJS is founder and shareholder of Diagnoptics Technologies, The Netherlands, the company which developed the AGE reader. JG received institutional grants from Roche, AbbVie and Siemens. The other authors have no disclosures to report.
AcknowledgementsWe like to acknowledge Anne van Gessel, Annet Possel-Nicolai, Margreet Teune-Weesjes, Marianne Bruin and Wietze Kuipers for performing the IMT and AGE measurements. We thank Gerrie Steursma for her administrative support.
Chapter 5
103
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65:5-29.Hanna NH, Einhorn, LH. Testicular cancer: Discoveries and updates. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:2005-2016.Weijl NI, Rutten MF, Zwinderman AH, et al. Thromboembolic events during chemotherapy for germ cell cancer: a cohort study and review of the literature. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:2169–78.Nuver J, Smit AJ, van der Meer J, et al. Acute chemotherapy-induced cardiovascular changes in patients with testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:9130– 7.Van den Belt-Dusebout AW, Nuver J, de Wit R, et al. Long-term risk of cardiovascular disease in 5-year survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:467–75.HaugnesHS,WethalT,AassN,etal.Cardiovascularriskfactorsandmorbidityin long-term survivors of testicular cancer: a 20-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:4649–57.NuverJ,SmitAJ,SleijferDT,etal.Microalbuminuria,decreasedfibrinolysis,and inflammation as early signs of atherosclerosis in long-term survivors of disseminated testicular cancer. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40:701–706.HaugnesHS,AassN,FossåSD,etal.Componentsofthemetabolicsyndromein long-term survivors of testicular cancer. Ann Oncol 2007; 18:241–8.De Haas EC, Altena R, Boezen HM, et al. Early development of the metabolic syndrome after chemotherapy for testicular cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:749–755.Fung C, Fossa SD, Milano MT, et al. Cardiovascular Disease Mortality After Chemotherapy or Surgery for Testicular Nonseminoma: A Population-Based Study. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:3105-15.Touboul P-J, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 34:290–6.Baldassarre D, Hamsten A, Veglia F, et al. Measurements of carotid intima-media thickness and of interadventitia common carotid diameter improve prediction of cardiovascular events. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60:1489–1499.Engelen L, Ferreira I, Stehouwer CD, et al. Reference intervals for common carotid intima-media thickness measured with echotracking: relation with risk factors. Eur Heart J 2013; 34:2368–2380.Meerwaldt R, Graaff R, Oomen PHN, et al. Simple non-invasive assessment of advanced glycation endproduct accumulation. Diabetologia 2004; 47:1324–30.Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 2005; 112:2735–52.Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012): The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J 2012; 33:1635–1701.Hentrich M, Fegg MJ, Meiler S, et al. Smoking cessation in long-term survivors of germ cell tumour. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2006; 132:557–60.Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, Culakova E, et al. Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood 2008; 111:4902-7. Piketty A-C, Fléchon A, Laplanche A, et al. The risk of thrombo-embolic events is increased in patients with germ-cell tumours and can be predicted by serum lactate dehydrogenase and body surface area. Br J Cancer 2005; 93:909-14.Bauskin AR, Brown DA, Kuffner T, et al. Role of macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 in tumorigenesis and diagnosis of cancer. Cancer Res 2006; 66:4983–4986.
123
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Vascular damage markers in testicular cancer patients during and after chemotherapy
104
Xu X, Li Z, Gao W. Growth differentiation factor 15 in cardiovascular diseases: from bench to bedside. Biomarkers 2011; 16:466–475.Altena R, Fehrmann RSN, Boer H, et al. Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF-15) Plasma Levels Increase during Bleomycin- and Cisplatin-Based Treatment of Testicular Cancer Patients and Relate to Endothelial Damage. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0115372.Sonneveld MAH, de Maat MPM, Leebeek FWG. Von Willebrand factor and ADAMTS13 in arterial thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood rev 2014; 28:167-178.Vormittag R, Simanek R, Ay C, et al. High factor VIII levels independently predict venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: the cancer and thrombosis study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2009; 29:2176–81.Srikanthan A, Tran B, Beausoleil M, et al. Large retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy as a predictor of venous thromboembolism in patients with disseminated germ cell tumors treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:582–7.O’Leary DH, Bots ML. Imaging of atherosclerosis: carotid intima-media thickness. Eur Heart J 2010; 31:1682–9.Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet 2005; 365:1415–28.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Chapter 5
105
Supplementary tables and figures
Supp
lem
enta
ry ta
ble
1. C
hara
cter
istic
s of p
atie
nts w
ith va
scul
ar e
vent
s (n=
8)
CT-s
can:
com
pute
d to
mog
raph
y sca
nner
; BEP
: ble
omyc
in, e
topo
side a
nd ci
spla
tin co
ntai
ning
chem
othe
rapy
; EP:
etop
osid
e and
cisp
latin
cont
aini
ng ch
emot
hera
py.
*: di
agno
sed
on ev
alua
ting
CT-s
can.
Su
pple
men
tary
tabl
e 1.
Cha
ract
erist
ics o
f pat
ient
s with
vas
cula
r eve
nts (
n=8)
A
ge
Even
t Sy
mpt
oms
Risk
fact
ors i
n va
scul
ar
finge
rprin
t
Axi
al Ø
larg
est
retr
oper
itone
al m
ass
on C
T-sc
an
Tim
ing
Trea
tmen
t O
utco
me
1 29
Isc
hem
ic
stro
ke
Yes
Ove
rwei
ght
Smok
er
Dys
lipid
emia
N
o vi
sible
mas
ses
1 ye
ar
afte
r BEP
Th
rom
boly
sis, a
ntic
oagu
latio
n M
ild a
phas
ia
2 45
Isc
hem
ic
stro
ke
Yes
Ove
rwei
ght
Smok
er
Dys
lipid
emia
N
o vi
sible
mas
ses
Dur
ing
4th
BEP
Thro
mbo
lysis
, ant
icoa
gula
tion,
ch
ange
of r
egim
en: a
bsta
ined
from
la
st 2
ble
omyc
in g
ifts
Die
d fro
m p
rogr
essiv
e di
seas
e 8
mon
ths a
fter
star
t of c
hem
othe
rapy
3 43
Isc
hem
ic
stro
ke, r
enal
in
farc
tion
Yes
Ove
rwei
ght
Hype
rtens
ion
Dys
lipid
emia
No
visib
le m
asse
s, ce
rvic
al ly
mph
nod
e on
ly
Dur
ing
4th
BEP
Antic
oagu
latio
n Fu
ll re
cove
ry
4 45
Sp
leni
c in
farc
tion
No*
O
verw
eigh
t D
yslip
idem
ia
4.0
cm
1 m
onth
af
ter B
EP
Antic
oagu
latio
n Fu
ll re
cove
ry
5 39
Pu
lmon
ary
embo
lism
N
o*
Dys
lipid
emia
1.
2 cm
1
mon
th
afte
r EP
Antic
oagu
latio
n Fu
ll re
cove
ry
6 36
Pu
lmon
ary
embo
lism
N
o*
Ove
rwei
ght
Hype
rtens
ion
Dys
lipid
emia
3.
4 cm
1
mon
th
afte
r BEP
An
ticoa
gula
tion
Full
reco
very
7 35
Pu
lmon
ary
embo
lism
Ye
s O
verw
eigh
t D
yslip
idem
ia
2.1
cm
Dur
ing
2nd
BEP
Antic
oagu
latio
n, c
hang
e of
regi
men
: in
stea
d of
3th
BEP
, 2 E
P Fu
ll re
cove
ry
8 27
Pu
lmon
ary
embo
lism
N
o*
Ove
rwei
ght
Dys
lipid
emia
3.
2 cm
D
urin
g 4t
h BE
P An
ticoa
gula
tion
Full
reco
very
CT
-sca
n: c
ompu
ted
tom
ogra
phy
scan
ner;
BEP:
ble
omyc
in, e
topo
side
and
cisp
latin
con
tain
ing
chem
othe
rapy
; EP:
eto
posid
e an
d ci
spla
tin c
onta
inin
g ch
emot
hera
py.
*: d
iagn
osed
on
eval
uatin
g CT
-sca
n.
106
Supplementary table 2. Patients with persistently high vWF and/or FVIII after one year versus patients with normalized vWF and FVIII after one year (n=65 patients with measured plasma biomarkers after one year)
vWF: von Willebrand Factor; FVIII: coagulation factor VIII; CT: chemotherapy; PAI-1: plasminogen activator inhibitor 1; t-PA: tissue plasminogen activator; GDF-15: growth differentiation factor 15; hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IMT: intima media thickness.
*Mann Whitney U test / Fisher exact test.
Supplementary table 2. Patients with persistently high vWF and/or FVIII after one year versus patients with normalized vWF and FVIII after one year (n=65 patients with measured plasma biomarkers after one year).
vWF and/or FVIII >150%
after one year n=19
Normalized vWF and VIII
after one year n=46
median/n range/% median/n range/% p*
Age at start of chemotherapy, years 36 25-45 30 18-46 .011
Cisplatin dose, mg/m2 300 300-700 300 300-400 .895 Biomarkers during 3th course vWF, % 203 144-379 142 51-276 <.001 FVIII, % 173 79-249 143 55-277 .004 PAI-1, µg/l 16 7-37 13 6-48 .416 t-PA, µg/l 9 5-16 7 3-16 .066 PAI-1/t-PA ratio 2.0 0.8-6.9 2.1 0.8-7.5 .493 GDF-15, pg/ml 5500 2475-14400 5235 3060-18959 .880 Hs-CRP, mg/L 0.7 0.2-132.0 0.4 0.2-9.6 .110 IMT change between start and one year after chemotherapy, µm 83 -31-300 3 -300-317 .181 Pre-chemotherapy high-risk vascular fingerprint 5 26 9 20 .418
vWF: von Willebrand Factor; FVIII: coagulation factor VIII; CT: chemotherapy; PAI-1: plasminogen activator inhibitor 1; t-PA: tissue plasminogen activator; GDF-15: growth differentiation factor 15; hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IMT: intima media thickness. *Mann Whitney U test / Fisher exact test.
Chapter 5
107
108