Sustainable Urban Transport Index
B H O PA L
2
Sustainable Urban Transport Index - SUTI
• A comprehensive framework to measure and monitor urban transport performance WRT
SDG
• Defines the status of the city transport WRT Indicators
• Comparison with other cities in the Asia – Pacific Region
• Monitor Progress
• An ongoing process – periodically to be carried out
• Collects data for comparative purposes
• Enables Identification of deficiencies
• Set targets
• Enables to identify good practices & lessons
• To receive feedback on indicators, Max-Min limits, Data base, Strategies
Presentation Structure
❑ City Overview
❑ Current Status of Urban Transport and Services
❑ Approach for SUTI Data Collection for Indicators
❑ SUTI Indicators Calculation
❑ Analysis of indicator
❑ Conclusion
Bhopal Urban Transport and Services
Bhopal Urban Transport and Services
2.10 Lacs Highest Ridership
1.65 Lacs Average Daily Ridership
46937 Daily KM’s
900 Daily Trips
401 KM Route Length
15 Routes
287* Buses Current Bus Operations
Bhopal Urban Transport and Services
BUS RAPID TRANSIT System
500m Interval – Utility Ducts
2.5m wide and 16m & 28m long - Bus Stop/Platform
3.35m each c/w – BRTS Bus Lane
24 Km – Corridor Length
Streets are brighter & safe
➢Launched on 27th Sept 2013, 05 Years before.
➢24 Km BRT Corridor connects 03 Railway Stations and 03 Bus Stations.
➢77 BRT Bus Stop integrated with Automatic Fare Collection System.
➢41 Bus Stops are now integrated with AFC system.
➢BRT was able to integrate city bus services due to proper design in respect of
integrated study,
➢BRT AC buses, Non AC Low Floor and Midi Buses are able to ply inside & outside of BRT
Corridor.
Approach for SUTI Data Collection
•Extent to which transport plans cover public transport, intermodal facilities and infrastructure for active modes
Indicator
• Modal share of active and public transport in commuting
Indicator
• Convenient access to public transport in commuting
Indicator
• Public transport quality and reliability
Indicator
• Traffic fatalities per 1,00,000 inhabitants
Indicator
• Affordability –travel costs as share of income
Indicator
• Operational costs of the public transport system
Indicator
• Investment in public transportation systems
Indicator
• Air quality (PM 10)
Indicator
• Greenhouse gas emissions from transport
Indicator
1 2 3
10
4 5
6 7 8 9
1Extent to which transport plans cover public transport, intermodal facilities and infrastructure for active modes
1Extent to which transport plans cover public transport, intermodal facilities and infrastructure for active modes
PROPSOSED CATEGORIES/TABLE FOR CALCULATING THIS INDICATOR (SEE SECTION 3.1 IN THE GUIDELINE)
Aspects Explanation Score
I) walking networksThe goals are ambitious, with much designation over city. The Comprehensive Mobility Plan -2031 for Bhopal Planning Area do envisages increased walking networks with secured new funding
3
II) cycling networksCycling networks are existing in present scenario, and plan foresees greater networks along major corridors allocated with phasing and have realistic budget
3
III) Intermodal transfer facilities
Seamless mobility has been a priority of the plan and factors leading to intermodal transfers like interchanges, integration of modes, fares and feeder services are given due consideration with secured new funding
3
IV) public transportPresent public transport mode share is not predominant and thus ambitious goals are indeed set with increased mode share and greater investments with secured funding is proposed in the plan
3
Total (sum) 12
RESULTS
Sr. No. IndicatorsNatural
WeightsNormalization
units MIN MAX
1Extent to which transport plans cover public transport, intermodal facilities and infrastructure for active modes
0 - 16 scale 0.1 0 16
Note: Decimal points used to allow reproduction in US format for report
2Modal share of active and public transport in commuting
2Modal share of active and public transport in commuting
PURPOSECOMMUTING
(Work and Education)
MODE Trip Rate Trips
a. Scheduled bus and minibus 0.278 560659
b. Train, metro, tram 0 0
c. Ferry 0 0
d. Other public 0 0
e. Public transport (a+b+c+d) 0.278 560659
f. Walking 0.52 1048189
g. Bicycle 0.05 97506
h. Active transport (f+g) 0.57 1145695
i. Passenger car 0.04 73129
j. Taxi 0 0
k. Motorcycle 0.3 609412
l. Scooter/moped 0 0
m. Para transit (unscheduled) 0.02 48753
n. Other motorized (trucks,etc) 0 0
o. Individual motorized (i+j+k+l+m+n) 0.36 731395
p. Total (e+h+o) 1.21 2437649
q. Public and active (e+h) 0.85 1706354
r. Modal share of active and public transport 70.0Sr. No. Indicators
NaturalWeights
Normalizationunits MIN MAX
2Modal share of active and public transport in commuting
% of trips
0.1 10 90
Note: Decimal points used to allow reproduction in US format for report
Comprehensive Mobility Plan (2012)Comprehensive Mobility Plan (2012)
Mode of Travel Total Trips Mode Share
Walk 1048189 43%
Cycle 97506 4%
2W 609412 25%
Auto 48753 2%
Car 73129 3%
Minibus 487530 20%
Standard Bus 73129 3%
3Convenient access to public transport in commuting
3
Network Length
(km)
Coverage area with a
buffer of 500m on
either side
(Km2)
Pop. Density
(inh/km2)
Inhabitants
#
370 290 5002 1452960
Total Population (2016) 2018000
% within 500m buffers 72
Methodology
1. Taz wise Population estimated
2. 370 Operational Stop location (2018) ;
3. Build buffer of 500m around the stop/stations
4. Calculated the % of population within the bufferof 500 m for SMC area
Results
Convenient access to public transport in commuting
Sr. No. IndicatorsNatural
WeightsNormalization
units MIN MAX
3Convenient access to public transport service
% of population
0.1 20 100
Note: Decimal points used to allow reproduction in US format for report
4Public transport Quality and Reliability
Public transport Quality and Reliability 4Dissatisfied Satisfied
Dimension RESP SATISF
Frequency of the service 345 813 1158 70.2
Punctuality (delay) * 338 820 1158 70.8
Comfort and cleanliness of vehicles 336 822 115871.0
Safety of vehicles 350 808 1158 69.8
Convenience of stops/stations 315 843 1158 72.8
Availability of information 329 829 1158 71.6
Personnel courtesy 299 859 1158 74.2
Fare level 290 869 1158 75.0
Responses 2601 6663 9264 71.9
Sr. No. IndicatorsNatural
WeightsNormalization
units MIN MAX
4 Public transport quality and reliability % satisfied 0.1 30 95
Note: Decimal points used to allow reproduction in US format for report
RESULTS
User Satisfaction Report_MoHUA, 2017
Source: User Satisfaction Report, MoHUA, 2017
5Traffic fatalities per 1,00,000 inhabitants
Traffic fatalities per 1,00,000 inhabitants 5Fatalities Number
Road transport 252
Railway transport 0
Tram 0
Ferryboats 0
Other 0
Total 252
Inhabitants 2018000
Fatalities/100,000 inhabitants 12
Status of Fatalities and Serious Injuries over the period
Sr. No. IndicatorsNatural
WeightsNormalization
units MIN MAX
5 Traffic fatalities per 100.000 inhabitants # fatalities 0.1 10 0
Note: Decimal points used to allow reproduction in US format for report
Year 2017 fatalities
Source: http://www.morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/Road_Accidents_in_India_2017.pdf
6Affordability – travel costs as share of income
Affordability – travel costs as share of income 6Services
Monthly Ridership
Market shares Single ticket
price Monthly cost
(60 tickets)Weighted
monthly cost
City Bus 83901 50.8 12 690 351
BRT 81099 49.2 14 810 398
Total 165000 100 0 749
Mean household income 15,000Affordability
5.0
Source: https://smartcities.data.gov.in/catalog/public-transport-accessibility-http://mybusbhopal.in/http://www.sutpindia.com/skin/pdf/BCLL%20Presentation-04092017_1.pdfUser Satisfaction Report_MoHUA, 2017
Sr. No. IndicatorsNatural
WeightsNormalization
units MIN MAX
6Affordability – travel costs as share of income
% of income
0.1 35 3.5
Note: Decimal points used to allow reproduction in US format for report
7Operational costs of the public transport system
Operational costs of the public transport system 7Services Fare Revenue Expenses Fare box ratio
Monthly Ridership
Share (%)
City bus 23,138,972 18,022,629 128% 83901 50.8
BRT 22,366,211 17,420,736 128% 81099 49.2
Total 45,505,183 35,443,364 128 1,65,000 100
Sr. No. IndicatorsNatural
WeightsNormalization
units MIN MAX
7Operational costs of the public transport system
Cost recovery
ratio0.1 22 100
Note: Decimal points used to allow reproduction in US format for report
Source: https://smartcities.data.gov.in/catalog/public-transport-accessibility-http://mybusbhopal.in/http://www.sutpindia.com/skin/pdf/BCLL%20Presentation-04092017_1.pdfBCLL Fare box revenue and opertional expenditure, 2019User Satisfaction Report_MoHUA, 2017
8Investment in public transportation systems
Investment in public transportation systems 8
Sr. No. IndicatorsNatural
WeightsNormalization
units MIN MAX
8 Investment in public transportation systems% of total
invest-ment0.1 0 50
Note: Decimal points used to allow reproduction in US format for report
INVESTMENTS BY THE CITY
15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 average
PUBLIC TRANSPORT FACILITIES (Rs in Lakhs) 4520.8 4027.3 350.0 727.7 698.7 2064.89TOTAL TRANSPORT (Rs in Lakhs) 28045.6 16969.3 5235.0 7600.2 10134.3 13596.89
SHARE (in %) 15.2
Source: Bhopal Municipal Budget 2016-2020
9Air quality (PM 10)
Air quality (PM 10) 9
Sr. No. IndicatorsNatural
WeightsNormalization
Units MIN MAX
9 Air quality (pm10) μg/m3 0.1 150 10
Note: Decimal points used to allow reproduction in US format for report
Location PM10 (yearly mean)
Bhopal Planning Area 105
Total city population 2018000
Population weighted concentration 105
Source: BRTS presentation_Feb19, Computed by CSE from CPCB air quality data submitted to Rajya Sabha for 44 cities and CPCB the ENVIS centre
10Greenhouse gas emissions from transport
Greenhouse gas emissions from transport 10
GHG
Emissions
(CO+Co2)
Total Vehicle
(Passenger + Freight)
Tons/day 2410.96
Tons/year
(per capita) 0.44
Sr. No. IndicatorsNatural
WeightsNormalization
units MIN MAX
10 Greenhouse gas emissions from transport Tons/cap 0.1 2.75 0
Note: Decimal points used to allow reproduction in US format for report
Year 2015 Total (tons/day)
ModesPM2.5 PM10 Nox CO CO2
Total Vehicles (Passenger +
Freight)4.79 5.07 8.49 109.59 2301.37
Source: http://www.urbanemissions.info/india-apna/bhopal-india/
InputsSr.
No.Indicators
Natural Weights
Range
units MIN MAX VALUE YEAR COMMENTS ABOUT DATA SOURCES OR ISSUES RELEVANT FOR INTERPRETATION
1
Extent to which transport plans cover public transport, intermodal facilities and infrastructure for active modes
0 - 16 scale
0.1 0 16
12 2031
Comprehensive Mobility Plan - Bhopal 2031, prepared in 2011 , Bhopal Municipal Corporation and DIMTS
2Modal share of active and public transport in commuting
% of trips 0.1 10 90
70 2012
Comprehensive Mobility Plan - Bhopal 2031, prepared in 2011 , Bhopal Municipal Corporation and DIMTS
3Convenient access to public transport service
% of population
0.1 20 100
72 2019
Calculated for Bhopal Planning Area , considering 370 bus stops along the operational routes.
4Public transport quality and reliability
% satisfied 0.1 30 9571.9 2017
User Satisfaction Report, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, GoI, prepared in 2017
5Traffic fatalities per 100.000 inhabitants
# fatalities 0.1 10 0
10 2017
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Road Accidents in India, prepared in 2017
6Affordability – travel costs as share of income
% of income
0.1 35 3.55 2019
MyBus Bhopal - Ridership data (2019); User Satisfaction Report_MoHUA (2017) (average household income within Bhopal Planning Area)
7Operational costs of the public transport system
Cost recovery
ratio0.1 22 100
100 2019BCLL Fare Box revenue and Operational Expenditure (2019)
8Investment in public transportation systems
% of total invest-ment
0.1 0 5015.2 2017-2019
Bhopal Municipal Budget from 2016 to 2020
9 Air quality (pm10) μg/m3 0.1 150 10105 2016
BRTS presentation_Feb19, Computed by CSE from CPCB air quality data submitted to Rajya Sabha for 44 cities and CPCB the ENVIS centre
10Greenhouse gas emissions from transport
Tons/cap 0.1 2.75 00.44 2015
Urban Emissions_India Apna for Bhopal
Outputs
C1 RESULT SPIDER DIAGRAM
1Extent to which transport plans cover public transport, intermodal
facilities and infrastructure for active modes75.00
2 Modal share of active and public transport in commuting
75.00
3 Convenient access to public transport service
65.00
4 Public transport quality and reliability
64.50
5 Traffic fatalities per 100.000 inhabitants
1.00
6 Affordability – travel costs as part of income
95.26
7 Operational costs of the public transport system
100.00
8 Investment in public transportation systems
30.37
9 Air quality (PM10)
32.14
10 Greenhouse gas emissions from transport
84.14
SUTI INDEX RESULTGeometric mean – 42.33
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
1. Extent to which transportplans cover public
transport, intermodalfacilities and infrastructure
for active modes
2. Modal share of activeand public transport in
commuting
3. Convenient access topublic transport service
4. Public transport qualityand reliability
5. Traffic fatalities per100.000 inhabitants
6. Affordability – travel costs as part of income
7. Operational costs of thepublic transport system
8. Investment in publictransportation systems
9. Air quality (pm10)
10. Greenhouse gasemissions from transport
THANK YOU