Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Neighbourhood PlanningNeighbourhood PlanningLearning from Cerne ValleyLearning from Cerne Valleythe West Dorset perspectivethe West Dorset perspective
David Evans – Environment DirectorDavid Evans – Environment DirectorWest Dorset District CouncilWest Dorset District Council
October 2011October 2011
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil West DorsetWest Dorset
Rural district – 138 parishes – 6 town councils
– 38 parish councils, 24 grouped councils
– 8 parish meetings Covering
400 sq miles (1,000 km²)
Population of just under 100,000
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil West DorsetWest Dorset
Environment vs. economy– 71% AONB
– World Heritage coastline
– 55 SSSIs and over 560 SNCIs
– SAMs – Cerne Giant, Maiden Castle...
– Low average wage level
– High land costs
– Poor communications
– Shortage of labour with relevant skills, and lack of affordable housing…
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil Our Front RunnersOur Front Runners
Central Government invited councils to ‘bid’ to be a front-runner
Gauged interest through our WDP annual assembly – 13 volunteered
Through selection put forward:
– Cerne Valley (first wave)
– Sherborne (third wave)
As part of our bid we said we wanted to work on a new-style Local Plan
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil What have we learned so far?What have we learned so far?
How the plan fits in the system
What it will cover
Who will prepare it
How long it will take
What resourcing it will need
What could trip us up?
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil How the plan fits…How the plan fits…
Part of the development plan– cannot override strategic policies / growth targets
– S38(6) status – decide in accordance unless material considerations indicate otherwise
Working out our strategic policies in tandem…– how locally do we set housing targets?
– could this come too late? Local control vs. material considerations– asking for clarity on the neighbourhood
development order
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil How the plan fits…How the plan fits…
Need to accord with EU and HR legislation– SEA / EIA requirements
– Right to be heard Who is responsible for the SEA/EIA?
– We don’t currently have an existing Sustainability Appraisal
– Local ownership / acceptance of options / vs. LPA or external expertise
How are consultation responses handled?
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil What will it cover?What will it cover?
(subject to the tests) its up to them…
– Location of development / development boundaries / criteria
– A new housing / employment site
– What infrastructure you hope to fund
– Design standards
– Permitted development rights
Single issue - or - belt and braces?– When a plan is silent…
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil Who will prepare it?Who will prepare it?
Parish Council LPA: hands-off approach Steering group established - ToR
– Defined membership – parish councillors and local people who “bring value to the project”, plus clerk and LPA link officer
– Declaration of personal interests
– Non-decision making
– Closed meetings but reporting regularly to the Parish Council
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Parish council / Neighbourhood Forum initiates process but the Borough / district council must agree the area to be covered
Local community develops plan Borough / district council has duty to support
Draft plan submitted to the council ‘Light touch’ public examination
checked against national and locally strategic policies, and EU legislation
Local referendum – if clear majority (51% of those that vote), the plan is adopted
How are they prepared?How are they prepared?
1
2
3
4
5
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Complete Stage
Jan 2011 Parish council agreed to pilot
Apr 2011 Parish council agreed steering group
Oct 2011 Process Planning
Jan 2012 Establishing needs, hopes and issues
April 2012 Developing solutions, finding consensus
July 2012 Drafting neighbourhood plan / NDO
Jan 2013 Consulting on the Neighbourhood plan
May 2013 Submission
?? Independent Examination
?? Referendum and adoption
How long will it take?How long will it take?
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil What resourcing will it need?What resourcing will it need?
No direct funding for parish councils– £20k funding at LPA’s discretion – intended to
cover LPA’s costs (referendum, examination etc)
– Other sources?• sponsorship from a local businesses• fund-raising events • Parish council precept• Council grant scheme (discretionary)
Referendum costs may vary widely Parish budgets and precepts set in advance Concerns over ‘trust’ if developer-sponsored
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil What resourcing will it need?What resourcing will it need?
Free advice / support through:– District Council– The Prince's Foundation for the Built Environment– Locality – Campaign to Protect Rural England – RTPI Planning Aid
Link officer time / resources– Resource-intensive initially – learning curve– Building trust between the council and the
community– Ability / knowledge to link with other council and
external support services
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil What resourcing will it need?What resourcing will it need?
Princes Foundation– Helping us run a facilitated 3-day community
planning event later this year (but not Saturday…) Locality – for the next steps? CPRE – no tailored advice RTPI Planning Aid – not in a deprived area
Design Council – village walk around (free) Other – AMT daily rate ranges from £250 to £350
per day (excluding expenses)
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Wes
t D
ors
et D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil What could trip us up?What could trip us up?
Not explaining the relationship with thelocal plan and parish plans
Changes in elected councillors Momentum vs. volunteer time Full community engagement
(especially in larger settlements) Managing expectations
– Scope of plan, funding for infrastructure, viability Managing our resources
– 69% keen, only 6% said they had no interest in preparing a neighbourhood plan