8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
1/17
Five Administrative Office Building Options
Public Input Results
Linn County Board of Supervisors
November 16, 2009
I I I
s t r a t e g i c c o m m u n i c a t i o n s
DAN WIESE MARKETING RESEARCH
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
2/17
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
3/17
strategic communications
RESULTS SUMMARY
Three hundred twenty-eight (328) residents of Linn County completed online surveys regarding the five AOB options.
Two hundred and eighty three residents (283) attended the open housesmost of which fully completed a survey.
(Surveys only partially completed were not considered.).
The first thing asked of the public was to give their opinion on how much importance the Linn County Board of
Supervisors should give specific criteria in evaluating the building options. The table below displays their answers.
Customer service is the criterion they believe should be given the greatest importance, followed by environmental.
Cost and technical are given less importance, but as shown in the chart below, all the criteria have at least some
importance. Few believe any of the criteria is of little or no importance.
Importance
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
Very High High Some Little or No No Answer
Importance Importance Importance Importance
Customer Service (accessiblelocation, good parking) 64.2% 22.3% 9% 3% 1.4%
Environmental (sustainability,energy efficiency, flood protection) 48.2% 33.1% 13.9% 2.8% 2%
Cost (purchase, renovation, lifecycle) 39.8% 35.9% 19.4% 1.8% 2.8%
Technical (size of building, meetsbuilding codes and standards) 36.7% 41.3% 16.4% 3.2% 2.1%
CustomerService
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Very High
High
Some
Little or NoImportance
No Answer
Environmental Cost
%
Technical
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
4/17
strategic communications
Next, residents were asked to rate the different choices for Linn County offices. Below are their answers
for each of the five options.
OPTION #1
Repair 2008 Flood Damage toAdministrative Office Building(Estimated net cost$0)
Option 1 is considered at least acceptable by 45% of those who rated it. It is rated unacceptable by 30%.
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
Option #1 Total
Outstanding choice 14.7%
Good choice 10.8%
Acceptable choice 19.4%
Poor choice 22.9%
Unacceptable choice 29.5%
No answer 2.7%
Sample Size 564
14.7%
10.8%
19.4%
22.99%
29.5%Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Poor
Unacceptable
No Answer
2.7%
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
5/17
strategic communications
OPTION #2
Renovate and Expand ExistingAdministrative Office Building(Estimated net cost$186,099to $8,987,446 dependent uponI-JOBS funding.)
This option, to renovate and expand the current Administrative Office Building is at least acceptable to 46% of
those who answered and considered unacceptable to 27%
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
Option #2 Total
Outstanding choice 18.7%
Good choice 13.7%
Acceptable choice 13.2%
Poor choice 24.2%
Unacceptable choice 27.2%No answer 3%
Sample Size 564
18.7%
13.7%
13.2%24.2%
27.2%Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Poor
Unacceptable
No Answer
3%
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
6/17
strategic communications
OPTION #3
Purchase and RenovateFormer Steve and BarrysRetail Space at Westdale Mall(Estimated net cost of $14,563,350)
Option 3, to renovate and stay in the current Steve and Barrys location, is at least acceptable to 55% of those
answering. It is unacceptable to 19%.
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
Option #3 Total
Outstanding choice 19.9%
Good choice 16.5%
Acceptable choice 19.0%
Poor choice 23.6%
Unacceptable choice 19.2%No answer 1.8%
Sample Size 564
19.9%
16.5%
19%
23.6%
19.2%Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Poor
Unacceptable
No Answer
1.8%
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
7/17
strategic communications
OPTION #4
Purchase and Renovate FormerEconoFoods Grocery Space(Estimated net cost of $13,388,297)
Option #4 is considered at least acceptable by 57% and unacceptable by 19%.
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
Option #4 Total
Outstanding choice 18.9%
Good choice 17.6%
Acceptable choice 20.1%
Poor choice 22.6%
Unacceptable choice 18.9%No answer 2%
Sample Size 564
18.9%
17.6%
20.1%
22.6%
18.9%Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Poor
Unacceptable
No Answer
2%
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
8/17
strategic communications
OPTION #5
Co-Location with City ofCedar Rapids and/or Cedar RapidsSchool District (Estimated net costof $13,023,250)
44% of residents answering the survey said this option is at least acceptable to them. It is unacceptable to 30%.
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
Option #5 Total
Outstanding choice 10.7%
Good choice 11.9%
Acceptable choice 21.7%
Poor choice 22.2%
Unacceptable choice 29.7%No answer 3.8%
Sample Size 564
10.7%
11.9%
21.7%
22.2%
29.7%
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Poor
Unacceptable
No Answer
3.8%
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
9/17
strategic communications
The table below summarizes the ratings given to the five options. The graph visualizes the findings.
Ratings
Options 2, 3, and 4 have the highest ratings with no clear-cut concensus. Option 1, repairing the existing AOB, is
next best, with Option 5, co-location, clearly the least well rated option.
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
Outstanding Good Acceptable Poor Unacceptable No Answer
OPTION 1: Repair AOB 14.7% 10.8% 19.4% 22.9% 29.5% 2.7%
OPTION 2: Expand AOB 18.7% 13.7% 13.2% 24.2% 27.2% 3%
OPTION 3: Steve and Barrys 19.6% 16.5% 19.0% 23.6% 19.2% 1.8%
OPTION 4: EconoFoods 18.9% 17.6% 20.1% 22.6% 18.9% 2%
OPTION 5: Co-locate 10.7% 11.9% 21.7% 22.2% 29.7% 3.8%
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Poor
Unacceptable
No Answer
Option #1Repair AOB
Option #2Expand AOB
Option #3Steve and
Barrys
Option #4EconoFoods
Option #5Co-Locate
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
%
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
10/17
strategic communications
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
1
Next respondents were asked to
rank the five options. They were
asked to indicate their first, second
and third ranking choice. The tables
to the right show the rankings.
First Choice Total
Option 3: Steve and Barrys 25.5%
Option 2: Expand AOB 24.1%
Option 4: EconoFoods 21.5%
Option 1: Repair AOB 17%
Option 5: Co-location 10.5%
No answer 1.1%
Sample Size 564
Second Choice Total
Option 3: Steve and Barrys 22.3%
Option 2: Expand AOB 19.7%
Option 4: EconoFoods 24.1%
Option 1: Repair AOB 19.7%
Option 5: Co-location 10.1%
No answer 2.8%
Sample Size 564
Third Choice Total
Option 3: Steve and Barrys 20%
Option 2: Expand AOB 12.1%
Option 4: EconoFoods 17.4%
Option 1: Repair AOB 11.7%
Option 5: Co-location 25.9%
No answer 9.8%
Sample Size 564
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
11/17
strategic communications
The graph below illustrates the rankings.
Rankings
It is apparent from the graph that Options 3, 2 and 4 stand out. Option 1 is less well ranked and Option 5 is
clearly the also ran among the five.
In evaluating this data, it is apparent that while there is some differentiation between the building options, theyall have their champions and detractors. There is no clear-cut concensus.
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
1
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
%
Option #1Repair AOB
Option #2Expand AOB
Option #3Steve and
Barrys
Option #4EconoFoods
Option #5Co-Locate
First Choice
Second Choice
Third Choice
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
12/17
strategic communications
Below are some representative comments from supporters of the various options in explaining why they made
their rankings.
First choice is Option 1: Repair AOB
I dont want any more debt.
No cost.
Money is tight! I feel this choice is the smartest. We are all having to conserve, cut back and government
should, too.
A no brainer minimal costs involved. Minimal flood damage. It just makes sense to move back like the
courthouse, jail and many other businesses have done.
Cost, not loosing tax base.
Already own the building. Never had any problem with parking. No additional cost. Ive found everything
there sufficient.
Cost. Central (downtown) location. Gives square feet they say they need.
Do not ask tax payers to come up with 9 million (or more depending on the option) to pay for upgrades
when flood protection for citizens has not been provided as yet.
No more dollars.
Very low cost to the taxpayerexisting building will be flood protectedno reason not to return.
Least expensive. Like locationcentralized and close to my home.
First choice is Option 2: Renovate and Expand AOB
Reuses an existing building and meets space needs.
The building is there. Used to go to that location. Cheapest.
For only 186,000.00, there is more possibilities for little money. The building should stay where its at.
Good spacefamiliar locationcosts! Good resale value if gets too small.
Gives needs for future expansion. If funding comes through an economical choice.
Costs, future of location, accessibility.
Cost. Central (downtown) location. Gives square feet they say they need.
Most cost effective and meets needs now and future.
Its the most reasonable.
No land purchased needed. Expansion of square feet should cover future needs.
If Penford doesnt want the building/land and as long as flood protection is there, might as well stay there.
Im torn between Option 2 and 3.
Overall cost and degree of satisfaction for meeting the long range needs of the county.
Because the possibility of still getting I-Jobs. So no new taxes. Dont have to bring it up to a vote.
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
1
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
13/17
strategic communications
First choice is Option 3: Steve and Barrys
Location. Parking spaces. Size. May help Westdale.
Location, parking, room for future growth.
#3 is accessiblegood for handicappedlots of parking and favored by various department heads.
Theres a lot of room and parking and the second floor has room for many other departments, such as
health department and others.
Accessibility, size of building, can have many offices there, great parking.
The building spacesquare feet. Parking, accessibility.
Have been there. Easier access. More space. No flooding. Employees like it also. Location, location, location.
Already there.
Plenty of parking, easily accessible, did not flood and probably never will. Provides additional space to
expand into during the 20 years of the bond.
Every office of Linn Co. is in one place. Its easy to access and lots of parking. It helps the stores that are
thereit brings more customers to them.
Plenty of space for expansion. Sufficient parking. Could help Westdale Mall come back to full capacity.
First choice is Option 4: EconoFoods
Easily accessible. More centrally located to rest of county. Parking close by. Options for expansion, rent foradditional space. All services located together.
Central location for countygood 380 route. Plenty of parking. Could renovate to be efficient over others.
Accessibility to all of Linn as most of the county is north of Cedar Rapids. Tax impact is more acceptable.
Parking would not be a foreseeable problem.
Option 4good location, lots of space for added county offices. Inside of building is a blank slate, also
space for future building. Good location to I-380. Good access from other towns.
Location, parking, ability to possibly lease some space. Keeping city and county separate.
EconoFoodsno disruption of current operations during renovation. Easy access via roads. Closest
proposed site to center of county. Adequate parking. Bus access negotiable with city. Building easily
handicap accessible. Easy to incorporate renewable energy (PV, front canopy, for example). I do not have a strong preference. The co-location may be good for the long run; it is not needed now. The
grocery store seems all around solutionsize and parking.
Locating more services closer together will save more money in long run. Good parking. Its away from flood.
Customers love easy access with plenty of parking.
Good location; good size; good for public.
Good location, good parking, room for growth.
Good location. Plenty of parking. Utilizes an empty building.
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
1
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
14/17
strategic communications
First choice is Option 5: Co-location
Convenient for allwill be popular.
It just makes sense. It not only improves customer service to our public, it also allows shared services that
will help with improved efficiencies.
Empty buildingable to design and configure space/offices without interruption. Ample parking planned.
Environmentally agreeable planning/energy efficiency/segregate government units/one level.
Some taxpayers money in long run. More efficient operations. More convenient services. Opportunity for
legacy. Opportunity for economic development.
Co-location maybe best if 20-40 years the county and city governments combine as well as everything in
one location now.
Centralization is always better, but it should only be city and county.
It makes sense to have these public-supported entities located together for efficiency.
Community collaboration and best interest of taxpayers.
Wise use, combined spacebecome a go to space for city/countyschoolbusiness and activity.
It has been recognized (but ignored) that Iowa has too many counties, school district, etc. Within 25 years
economics will force this to the top of the table. Des Moines is probably our largest in-state competition.
They have moved closer to a metro form of government. We too need to move in that direction. We claim
to believe in the corridor concept yet to date parochial trumps partnerships. I firmly believe that Johnson
and Linn counties will eventually merge into a metro political and economic entity.
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
1
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
15/17
strategic communications
FOCUS GROUPS
Focus groups are utilized to delve deeper into participants top-of-mind thoughts about a subject. For example,
magazine publishers and editors might hold focus groups about colors, content and even a potential magazines
name, prior to launching a new publication. Retailers utilize focus groups to identify product displays that draw
shoppers. Hospitals utilize focus groups to find out what patients found unique about their services.
In this case, our goal was twofold: 1) ensure participants were fully informed about the five potential options for
the new AOB and 2) record their final preferences when they had applied the same evaluation criteria that the
Board of Supervisors will utilize in making its final decision.
Participants were randomly selected from voter registration, business and employee lists, respectively.
Notethose criteria are:
1) Customer Servicelocation (access from all areas of the county), easy access to services once there
2) EnvironmentalSilver LEED Certification, sustainability, reduced carbon footprint
3) Costpurchase price, construction/renovation, lifecycle
4) Technicalmeeting building code requirements.
Linn County Residents
While all focus groups came well-informed about the five options for the AOB, the group representing Linn
County residents (11 people) was both well-informed and well-prepared to discuss their thoughts. They camewith strong opinions and yet were very open to listening to each others opinions. Some were swayed by others
thoughts and openly admitted so. Discussion was spirited as each participant shared his/her thought processes
about the various options.
In the end, each identified his/her key criteria and made the choice based on that selection. Customer service
(location, in this case) was most important to the majority of this group after lengthy discussion. Cost remained
most important to one person in the group. All agreed that the Environmental Criteria should be a part of any
option chosen. They also agreed that Technical was well, technical, and you couldnt argue with building codes
being vital to a safe, secure building.
Of those selecting customer service/location, Option #3former Steve & Barryswas the choice of five
participants. In so choosing, they identified: easy access from anywhere in the county (grudgingly admitting to
one naysayer that the one exception might be Marion). They think there is potential growth in this area of the
county and thus, property in that region will maintain its value. While one person said she felt very safe at this
location, another vehemently disagreedespecially after the county offices close.
One person thought Option #4former EconoFoodsthe easiest to access, and another believes that the county
should continue to anchor and help rebuild downtown by selecting Option #2, with or without I-JOBS funding.
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
1
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
16/17
strategic communications
As they proceeded in their discussions, individuals in this group began admitting strong interest in Option #5
Co-Location w/the CR School District and/or the City of Cedar Rapids. Each hesitated to bring it up and quickly
concluded it might be a challenge to get participating organizations to agree. (This discussion started with an
impromptu discussion about the potential merger of city/county governments in Linn County.)
Out of the discussion about Option #5, however, came an Option #6. In short, this group explored the idea of
Linn County constructing a new building based on the square footage identified in Option #2 and the industry
standards used to estimate the cost of this square footage in a co-location situation. Two people adhered to this
idea when considering both customer service and cost important.
Linn County Business Representatives
While the 8 representatives of Linn County businesses were not as thoroughly informed about the five options
as the residents, the individuals in the group had many questions they wanted to ask before beginning criteria
evaluation and selection of their preferences among the five options.
Their initial questions ranged from, How did Option #4EconoFoodsget into the mix, to is energy efficiency
and option for all? to what is the I-JOBS funding?
Again, customer service was a top priority among this group. And again, customer service was essentially limited
to where the AOB is located in the county.
Of those who believed that customer service (location) was the most important6 believed that would be
accomplished with Option #2. One person thought Option #4 was the best and one person chose Option #5.
One person insisted that fiscal responsibility should be a part of each option and adhered to that throughout
the discussion. Interestingly enough, this person thought that Option #5Co-Locationor an Option #6
identifying a completely different location for a new AOB, using the figures from Option #5 and constructing
a new AOB, would actually be the most fiscally responsible decision. He/she sighted potential county growth,
knowing what we were getting instead of tearing into old, existing buildings and thinking about the length of
time this building will be in service as reasons for preferring this option.
Similar to two other groups, many in this group agreed with this person.
Linn County Employees
AOB Employees
This group of 9 came prepared to discuss until dawn if necessary. Theyre engaged, interested and very enthusiastic
about helping their employer (to which they are very loyal) meet the needs of their customersincluding
themselves in this category.
Initially, rumors were the first topic of interest which have already been shared with Joi Bergman, Communications
Director. The rumors ranged from continued mold in the existing AOB, to moving employee parking further
from the existing AOB to parking being moved to the juvenile court space near the existing AOB.
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359
1
8/14/2019 Linn County Offices Report
17/17
strategic communications
As these issues were put to restmaybethe conversation turned to the evaluation criteria used for the five
options. Many said they had never seen it, and many were concerned that the information had not been shared
with the engineers doing the feasibility studies on the various sites.
Again, once issues were put to rest, thoughtful, in-depth discussion ensued. Everyone in this group was convinced
that customer service was the most important of the evaluation criteria. They encourage the supervisors to listen
to employee needs, but especially pointed out that what Linn County residents like about the temporary location
are customer service oriented and should be considered with any option that is chosenclose-in parking, wide
hallways, and what is perceived as faster service in these more open areas.
As they were walked through the criteria and encouraged to overlay them against the five options, four thought
Option #4 provided the best customer service potential for both them and their customers; two thought thesecould be accomplished with Option #2, two favored co-location and one said, I dont think weve evaluated all
options yet.
The employee who said this was again, thoughtful and insightful. Her/his concerns were long-term in nature,
wondering who was evaluating all Linn County space needs for 25-30 years into the future, as the new or
rejuvenated AOB is planned.
Employees Who Will Not be Housed in the AOB
This group of 10 employees was interested, happy someone wanted their opinion, and fairly well-informed about
the five options.
Eventually, the group focused on the evaluation criteria and was very interested in defining each category. Again,customer service (including them as customers) was the most important criteria on the list. Each agreed that if
done correctly, environmental and fiscal responsibility should be a part of all options.
Of this group of customer-focused employees, 3 agreed that Option #4EconoFoodswould be the most
customer centric of the five; two thought Option #2 would be the best in this area, and two strongly believed that
Option #5Co-Location would provide the best customer service for the most people. Three in this group really
couldnt decide but leaned toward either Option #2 or Option #4.
Sondy Daggett
909 Rosedale Road Southeast
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403
319.310.4359