CIO 'AD-A204 620
INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAMPHASE l-CONFIRMATION/QUANTIFICATION
STAGE 1
For
Minot Air Force BaseMinot, North Dakota
Prepared By:
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.530 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10036
October 1988
Volume 2 of 3
Appendices A Through F
PPROT) FOR PlIILIC RELEASE: DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED
Prepared For.
HEADQUARTERS STRATEGIC AIR COMMANDCOMMAND SURGEONS OFFICE (HO SAC/SGPS) ELECBIOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DIVISIO4
OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE. NEBRASKA 68113 r1 3 F E 3 9AndUNITED STATES AIR FORCE OCCUPATIONAL ,ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LABORATORY (USAFOEHL)TECHNICAL SERVICES DIISION (TS)BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS 78235-5501
2 9
INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM
PHASE II - CONFIRMATION QUANTIFICATION
STAGE 1
APPENDICES TO THE FINAL REPORTFOR
MINOT AIR FORCE BASEMINOT, NORTH DAKOTA
HEADQUARTERS STRATEGIC AIR COMMAND ,COMMAND SURGEON'S OFFICE (HQ SAC/SGPB)BIOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DIVISION
OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE, NEBRASKA 68113
October 1988 Aceession Forti S GRA I
Prepared by: DTIC TABUnannounced C
Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc. Just$tation
530 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10036 By
Distribution/USAF CONTRACT No. F33615-84-D-4404 Availability Codes
Delivery Order No. 0008 . Ava'and/or
USAF Technical Program Manager: DIst Special
ILt Franz J. Schmidt
Prepared For:
United States Air Force Occupationaland Environmental Health Laboratory (USAFOEHL)
Technical Services Division (TS)Brooks Air Force Base, Texas 78235-5501
(CL50608/0528N)
LIST OF APPENDICES
A. Definitions, Nomenclature and Units of Measure
B. MAFB Task Description/Statement of Work
C. Well Numbering System
D. Geological Logs
D.1 HART Test Boring Logs
D.2 Boring Logs for USGS Test Borings Completed in theVicinity of MAFB
E. Field Raw Data
F. Field Analytical Procedures, Sample Identification CrossReference and Dates of Sample Analyses
F.1 Field Analytical Procedures
F.2 Sample Identification Cross Reference and Dates of SampleAnalyses
G. Chain of Custody Forms
H. Laboratory Analytical Results Reports
H.1 Aromatic and Halogenated Volatile Organic Analyses Resultsfor Water Samples
H.I.a Aromatic and Halogenated Volatile Organic AnalysesResults for PTL Job No. 86GW3506 Water Samples
H.l.b Aromatic Volatile Organic Analysis Results for PTLJob No. 86GW3523 Water Samples
H.1.c Halogenated Volatile Organic Analysis Results forPTL Job No. 86GW3523 Water Samples
H.I.d Aromatic Volatile Organic Analysis Results for PTLJob. No. 86GW3538 Water Samples
H.1.e Halogenated Volatile Organic Analysis Results forPTL Job No. 86GW3538 Water Samples
(CL5061B/0536N)
LIST OF APPENDICES (Continued)
H.2 Aromatic and Halogenated Volatile Organic Analyses Resultsfor Soil and Sediment Samples (and a Trip Blank Sample)
H.3 Acid and Base/Neutral Extractable Priority PollutantOrganic Analyses Results for Water Samples
H.3.a Acid Extractable Priority Pollutant OrganicAnalysis Results for PTL Job No. 86GW3506 WaterSamples
H.3.b Base/Neutral Extractable Priority PollutantOrganic Analysis Results for PTL Job No. 86GW3506Water Samples
H.3.c Acid Extractable Priority Pollutant OrganicAnalysis Results for PTL Job No. 86GW3523 WaterSamples
H.3.d Base/Neutral Extractable Priority PollutantOrganic Analysis Results for PTL Job No. 86GW3523Water Samples
H.3.e Acid Extractable Priority Pollutant OrganicAnalysis Results for PTL Job No.86GW3538 WaterSamples
H.3.f Base/Neutral Extractable Priority PollutantOrganic Analysis Results for PTL Job No. 86GW3538Water Samples
H.4 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analysis Results for WaterSamples
H.5 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analysis Results for Soil andSediment Samples
H.6 Priority Pollutant Metals Analyses Results for Water Samples
H.7 Priority Pollutant Metals Analyses Results For Soil andSediment Samples
H.8 Common Anion and Total Dissolved Solids Analyses Resultsfor Water Samples
(CL5061B/0536N)
LIST OF APPENDICES (Continued)
,H.9 PTL QC Data
H.9.a Laboratory Methodology Summary
H.9.b Priority Pollutant Metals, Common Anions and TotalDissolved Solids Duplicate and Matrix SpikeAnalyses Results for Water Samples
H.9.c Halogenated Volatile Organic Duplicate and MatrixSpike Analyses Results for Water Samples
H.9.d Laboratory Chronicles
H.1O J&L Testing Company Results for Grain Size Analysis ofMAFB Subsurface Soil Samples
H.11 J&L Testing Company Results for Triaxial PermeabilityAnalysis of MAFB Subsurface Soil Samples
I. Correspondence with Federal, State and/or Local RegulatoryAgencies
J. References
K. Biographies of Key Personnel
L. Technical Operations Plan and Site Safety Plan
M. Technical Literature Review
(CL5O61B/0536N)
APPENDIX A
DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE
(CL5O6OB/0528N)
A-I
DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE
Most of the following are derived from theAmerican Geological Institute (1976) Glossary.
Term Definition
Aquifer Stratum or zone below the surface of the earth capableof producing a significant amount of water as from awell.
Flow Velocity The rate a moving fluid travels. Measured in distancetraveled over a given period of time.
Gradient Slope of a stream or land surface.
Ground Water That part of the subsurface water which is in the zoneof saturation.
Hydraulic Ratio of flow velocity to driving force for viscous flowConductivity under saturated conditions of a specified liquid in a
porous medium.
Lithology The physical character of a rock.
Permeability The capacity of a rock or sediment for transmitting afluid. Degree of permeability depends upon the sizeand shape of the pores, the size and shape of theirinterconnections, and the extent of the latter. It ismeasured by the rate at which a fluid of standardviscosity can move a given distance through a giveninterval of time.
Potentiometric Surface to which water in an aquifer would rise bySurface hydrostatic pressure under atmospheric pressure.
Porosity The ratio of the void volume of a rock or soil to itstotal volume.
Recharge a.) Intake. The processes by which water is absorbedand is added to the zone of saturation, either directlyor indirectly by way of another formation.
b.) The quantity of water that is added to the zone ofsaturation.
Saturated The interval of rock or soil which is saturated with re-Thickness spect to water if all its interstices are filled with
water.
Sediment Solid material settled from suspension in a liquid.
(CL506OB/0528N)
A-2
DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE (CONTINUED)
Term Definition
Specific A constant indicating the discharge expressed as a rateCapacity yield per unit of drawdown.
Specific Yield The ratio of the volume of water which a rock or soil,after being saturated, will yield by gravity to its ownvolume.
Stratigraphy That branch of geology which deals with the formation,composition, sequence and correlation of the stratifiedrocks as parts of the earth's crust.
Transmissivity The ease with which water moves through a unit width ofaquifer.
Water Table The upper surface of a zone of saturation, except wherethat surface is formed by an impermeable body.
Zone of A subsurface zone in which all the interstices areSaturation filled with water under pressure equal to or greater
than that of the atmosphere.
(CL5O6OB/0528N)
A-3
DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE (CONTINUED)
Abbreviation/Unit of Measure Definition
A Area
AD Air Division
ADCOM Aerospace Defense Command
ADI Acceptable Daily Intake
ADL Above Detection Limits
AFB Air Force Base
AVO Aromatic Volatile Organics
AWQC Ambient Water Quality Criteria
BMW Ballistic Missile Wing
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation andLiability Act.
CFR Code of the Federal Register
CLP Contract Laboratory Program
cm centimeter
cm/sec centimeters per second
COE United States Army Corps of Engineers
DEQPPM Defense Environmental Quality Program Policy Memorandum
DOD Department of Defense
DOH Department of Health
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
ESE Environmental Science and Engineering
et al. and others
EOD Explosive Ordnance Disposal Area
FR Federal Register
(CL5060B/0528N)
A-4
DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE (CONTINUED)
Abbreviation/Unit of Measure Definition
ft feet
FTA Firefighting Training Area
ft/day feet per day
ft2/day squared feet per day
gpm gallons per minute
HART Fred C. Hart Associates Inc. (USAF consultant)
HVO Halogenated Volatile Organics
I gradient (slope of the water), where Q - KIA; V - KI/p
ID inside diameter
IN inch
IRP Installation Restoration Program (of USAF)
K permeability, where Q - KIA; V - KI/p
MAFB Minot Air Force Base
MCL Maximum Concentration Level
MDL Minimum Detection Limit
mg/kg milligrams per kilogram
mg/l milligrams per liter
min minutes
-m millimeters
msl mean sea level (feet above)
NA not analyzed
ND no data; not detected
NDWQS North Dakota Water Quality Standards
(CL5O6OB/0528N)
A-5
DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE (CONTINUED)
Abbreviation/Unit of Measure Definition
NIPDWS National Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards
NP not performed
NR not reported
NSDWS National Secondary Drinking Water Standards
OVA Organic Vapor Analyizer
p porosity, where V - KI/p
PP Priority Pollutant
ppb parts per billion
PPCL Preliminary Protective Concentration Limit
ppm parts per million
PTL Princeton Testing Laboratory (HART consultant)
PVC polyvinyl chloride (well casing)
Q discharge rate
QA quality assurance
QC quality control
RCRA Resource Recovery and Conservation Act
RMCL Recommended Maximum Contaminant Levels
SAC Strategic Air Command
Sec seconds
SLA Sanitary Landfill Area
SMW Strategic Missile Wing
SNARL Suggested No-Adverse Response Level
SOW Statement of Work
(CL5060B/0528N)
A-6
DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE AND UNITS OF MEASURE (CONTINUED)
Abbreviation/Unit of Measure Definition
SPF Strategic Protection Force
TDS Total Dissolved Solids
TOC top of casing
UCR unit cancer risk
ug/gm micrograms per gram
ug/l micrograms per liter
USAF United States Air Force
USAFOEHL United Sates Air Force Occupational & EnvironmentalHealth Laboratory
USGS United States Geological Survey
V velocity
VOA volatile organic analysis
VOC volatile organic compound
(CL5O6OB/0528N)
APPENDIX B
MAFB TASK DESCRIPTION/STATEMENT OF WORK
(CL5O6OB/0528N)
35 JUN i
INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAMPHASE II - CONFIRMATION/QUANTIFICATION (STAGE 1)
MINOT AFB ND
I. DESCRIPTION OF WORK
- The overall objective of the Installation Restoration Program (IRP) PhaseII investigation is to assess potential contamination at past hazardous wastedisposal and spill sites on Air Force installations. A series of staged fieldinvestigations may be required to meet this objective.
The purpose of this task is to undertake a field investigation at MinotAFB ND to: (1) confirm the presence or absence of contamination within thespecified areas of investigation; (2) if possible, determine the extent anddegree of contamination and the potential for migration of those contaminantsin the various environmental media; (3) identify public health andenvironmental hazards of migrating pollutants based on State or Federalstandards for those contaminants; and (4) delineate additional investigationsrequired beyond this stage to reach the Phase II objectives. 7 . 1
The Phase I IRP Report (mailed under separate cover) incorporates the -
background and description of the sites/zones for this task. To accomplishthis survey effort, the contractor shall take the following actions:
A. General Requirements - The general requirements are applicable to allsites unless modified by the site specific work in Section I.B.
1. Monitor the ambient air during all well drilling and soil boringwork with a photoionization meter or equivalent organic vapor detector toidentify the generation of potentially hazardous and/or toxic vapors or gases.Include air monitoring results in the boring logs. If soil encountered duringborehole drilling is suspected to be hazardous because of abnormal discolora-tion, odor or air monitoring levels, containerize the soil cuttings in new,unused drums. Enter into the boring logs the depth(s) from which suspectedcontaminated soil cuttings were collected for containerization. Take acomposite sample from the contents of each drum. Collect a maximum of 10composite samples and test them for EP Toxicity (metals). Use RCRA criteriato determine if soil cuttings must be classified as hazardous waste (40 CFR261.24).
2. Determine the exact location of all monitor wells and soil boringsduring the planning/mobilization phase of the field investigation. Consultwith base personnel to minimize disruption of base activities, to properlyposition wells with respect to exact site locations, and to avoid undergroundutilities. Direct the drilling and sampling and maintain a detailed log ofthe conditiop4 and materials penetrated during the course of the work. Do notdrill boreholes or position wells in actual landfill areas; install wells atthe landfill perimeter.
3. Determine the areal extent of the sites by reviewing historical
and current panchromatic and infrared aerial photography.
4. Installation of Ground Water Monitoring Wells
a. Comply with the U.S. EPA Publication 330/9-SI-002, NEIC Manualfor Ground Water/Subsurface Investigations at Hazard Waste Sites formonitoring well installation.
b. All well drilling, development, purging, sampling methods, andother activity pertaining to this effort must conform to state and otherapplicable regulatory agency requirements. Cite references in an appendix tothe Final Report.
c. Install wells at a sufficient depth to collect samples repre-sentative of aquifer quality and to intercept contaminants if they arepresent.
d. Avoid, when possible, installing wells in depressions or areas
subject to frequent flooding and standing water. If wells must be installedin such areas, design the wells such that standing water does not leak intothe top of the casing or cascade down the annular space.
e. Drill all monitoring wells using the following specifications:
(1) Drill all wells using hollow-stem auger techniques. Acenter stem, plug, and bit attached to the stem may be inserted into the augerfor use while drilling. This will prevent material from entering into thehollow stem of the auger.
(2) Take lithologic samples at five-foot intervals andprepare borehole log descriptions. Include pilot boring logs and wellcompletion summaries in the Final Report (Item VI, below).
(3) Drill a maximum of 16 wells. Total footage for all wellsin this task shall not exceed 500 linear feet. Refer to the site specificdetails in Section I.B.
(4) Construct each well with two-inch inside diameter (I.D.)Schedule 40 PVC casing. Use threaded screw-type joints, glued fittings arenot permitted. Flush thread all connections. Screen each well using two-inch
I.D. casing having up to 0.020 inch slots; slot size may vary based uponborehole geology. Screen material must be the same as that of the casing.Cap the bottom of the screen.
(5) Unless specified differently in Section B, Site SpecificWork, screen all wells so as to collect floating contaminants and to allow foryearly fluctuations of the water table. Screen all wells a maximum of tenfeet.
f. Complete all monitoring wells using the followingspecifications:
2
(1) Once the casing is installed, allow the soil formation tocollapse around the well screen. Supplement the natural gravel-pack withwashed and bagged rounded silica sand or gravel with a grain size distributioncompatible with the screen and soil formation. Place the pack from the bottomof the borehole to two feet above the top of the screen. Tremie a five footbentonite pellet seal above the sand/gravel pack. Ensure the bentonite formsa complete seal. Grout the remainder of the annulus to the land surface witha Type I Portland cement/bentonite slurry.
(2) Check with the base point of contact (POC) to determinewhether wells shall be completed flush or project above the ground surface:
(a) If well stick-up is of concern in an area, completethe well flush with the land surface. Cut the casing two to three inchesbelow land surface, and install a protective locking lid consisting of a cast-iron valve box. Center the lid assembly in a three foot diameter concrete padsloped away from the valve box. Ensure free drainage is maintained within thevalve box. Also, provide a screw-type casing cap to prevent infiltration ofsurface water. Maintain a minimum of one foot clearance between the casingtop and the bottom of the valve box. Clearly mark the well number on thevalve box lid.
(b) If an above ground surface completion is used,extend the well casing two or three feet above land surface. Provide an end-plug or casing cap for each well. Shield the extended casing with a steelguard pipe which is placed over the casing and cap, and seated in a two-footby two-foot by four-inch concrete surface pad. Slope the pad away from thewell sleeve. Install a lockable cap or lid at the casing. Install three,three-inch diameter steel guard posts if the Base POC determines the well isin an area which needs such protection. The guard posts shall be five feet intotal length and installed radially from each wellhead. Recess the guardposts approximately two feet into the ground and anchor with concrete. Do notinstall the guard posts in the concrete pad placed at the well base. Paintthe protective steel sleeve and clearly number the well on the sleeveexterior.
(c) Provide locks for both flush and above-ground wellassemblies. Turn over the master keys to the Base POC following completion ofthe field effort.
(3) As soon as practical after completion, develop each wellwith a submersible pump, bailer, and/or airlift method. Continue welldevelopment until the discharge water is clear and free of sediment to thefullest extent possible. Measure the rate of water produced, the pH, specificconductance and water temperature during well development and include thisinformation in the Final Report.
a (4) Determine by survey the elevation of all newly installed
monitoring wells to an accuracy of 0.01 foot. Notch the top of the risercasing where well elevations are established. Horizontally locate the newwells to an accuracy of 1.0 foot and record the position on both project andsite specific maps. Bench marks used must have previously been establishedfrom and be traceable to a USCGS or USGS survey marker.
3
(5) Measure water levels at all monitoring wells as feetbelow the ground surface or below the top of casing elevation to the nearest0.01 foot. Report in terms of mean sea level (MSL). Measure static waterlevels in wells prior to well development and before all well purging whichprecedes sampling events.
5. Recommend candidate well abandonment method(s) or technique,including costs, which are applicable to the type of monitoring wellsinstalled and geological conditions. Consider that these wells will beabandoned at some future date after the study objectives have been met andthere is no longer a need for the wells. The actual process of wellabandonment is not a part of this task order. Assure that the recommendedmethod(s) meets state and/or local well abandonment guidelines or regulations.
6. Complete permits, applications, and other forms which may berequired by local and/or state regulatory agencies for the installation ofmonitor wells. File these documents with appropriate agencies &nd pay allpermitting and filing fees.
7. Soil Borings
a. Conduct five soil borings not to exceed a total of 200 linearfeet. Accomplish the borings using hollow-stem auger techniques. Obtainsplit-spoon samples using ASTM Method D-1586. Refer to the site specificdetails, Section I.B., for the soil sample collection depths.
b. During the boring operations, describe lithologies encounteredand prepare stratigraphic logs. Place special emphasis on field identifica-tion of contaminated soils encountered.
c. Scan all split-spoon soil cores with a photolonization meteror equivalent organic vapor detector. Include monitoring results in theboring logs.
d. Whenever possible, measure water levels in all boreholes afterthe water level has stabilized. Examine the water surface for the presence ofhydrocarbons. Include the information In the boring logs.
e. Tremie-grout all boreholes to the surface with a bentonite/cement grout. It is especially Important to insure they are adequatelyresealed to preclude future migration of contaminants.
f. Permanently mark each location where soil borings aredrilled. Record the location on a project map for each specific site or zone,whichever is applicable.
8. gell and Borehole Cleanup
Remove all well/borehole cuttings and clean the general areafollowing the completion of each well/borehole. Containerize and storecuttings according to paragraph I.A.1. of this task order. Transport these
• . m | l I I I4
drums to a location on Minot AFB designated by the Base POC. The base is
responsible for ultimate disposal of contaminated soils using base resources.
9. Field Sampling
a. Strictly comply with the sampling techniques, maximum holdingtimes, and preservation of samples as specified in the following references:Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th Edition(1985), pages 37-44; ASTM, Section 11, Water and Environmental Technology;Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846,2nd Edition (USEPA, 1984); Methods for Chemical Analysis of Waters and Wastes,EPA Manual 600/4-79-020, pages xiii to xix (1983); and Handbook for Samplingand Sample Preservation of Water and Wastewater, EPA Document 600/4-82-029(1982).
b. Allow wells to stabilize after development for a minimum ofseven days before sampling.
c. Prior to purging the wells, examine the surface of the watertable for the presence of hydrocarbons and take water level measurements tothe nearest 0.01 foot with respect to the established survey point on top ofthe well casing. If applicable, measure the thickness of the hydrocarbonlayer and collect a sample of the hydrocarbons. Analyze the samples forpetroleum hydrocarbons (Attachment 1 includes an allowance for these samples).
d. Purge the well using a submersible pump, bailer, or otherpertinent method. Purge until a minimum of three well volumes (based onborehole diameter) of water have been displaced and the pH, temperature,specific conductance, color, and odor of the discharge have stabilized usingthe following criteria: pH ± 0.1 unit, temperature ± 0.50C, and specificconductance t 10 umhos. Include the final measurements In the Results sectionof the report.
e. Collect water samples with a Teflon bailer. However, tocollect representative aquifer samples where floating hydrocarbons arepresent, use a "thief sampler" or similar device to minimize the influence ofthe free product.
f. If the well(s) cannot be sampled due to well development, wellcharacteristics, or other reason(s), indicate the reason(s) in the report asspecified in Item VI below.
g. Permanently mark the location where surface water or sedimentsamples are collected. Record the location on a project map for each site orzone, whichever applies.
h. Split all water and soil samples. Analyze one set andimmediately deliver the other set (the same collection day) to the Base POC.The Base POC will select 10% of the split samples, package the selections withappropriate forms, and deliver them to the contractor within 24 hours ofreceipt. Supply all packing and shipping materials to the Base POC forpackaging the split samples. Immediately ship (within 24 hours) the POCselected samples through overnight delivery to:
5
USAFOEHLISABldg 140Brooks AFB TX 78235-5501
For all split samples sent to the USAFOEHL, complete an AF Form 2752A
"Environmental Sampling Data" and/or an AF Form 2752B "Environmental SamplingData - Trace Organics", (working copies have been provided under separatecover) with the following information:
(1) Date and time collected
(2) Purpose of sample (analyte and sample group)
(3) Installation name (base)
(4) Sample number (on containers)
(5) Source/location and depth of sample
(6) Contract Task Numbers and Title of Project
(7) Method of collection (bailer, suction pump, air-lift pump,
split-spoon, etc.)
(8) Volumes removed before sample taken
(9) Special Conditions (use of surrogate starfdard, etc.)
(10) Preservatives used
(11) Collector's name or initials
In addition, label each sample container with a permanent ink pen (laundry
marker) to reflect the data in (1), (2), (3), (4), (10) and (11) above.
i. For every 10 field samples collected, take one additional
sample (a field duplicate) for quality control purposes. Attachment 1
provides a 10% allowance for these additional analyses. Duplicates shall be
indistinguishable from other analytical samples so personnel performing the
analyses are not able to determine which samples are duplicates.
J. For every 20 field water samples collected, prepare and submit
for analysis one additional field blank for all parameters analyzed in water.
A minimum of one field blank for each parameter is required. Allowances for
these additional analyses are included in Attachment 1.
k. Maintain chain-of-custody records for all samples, fieldblanks, and quality control samples.
10. Chemical Analyses
6
, , i i I I I
a. Analyze water and soil samples collected as specified inSection B below, Specific Site Work. The analytical parameters are summarizedin Attachment 1 along with the required methods. Archive all raw data,including QA/QC and standards data for not less than five years after projectcompletion. Supply this data to the USAFOEHL/TS upon request.
b. All analyses shall meet the required limits of detection forthe applicable method identified in Attachment 1.
c. For those methods which employ gas chromatography (GC) as theanalytical technique (E601, SW8010 and SW8020) positive confirmation ofidentity is required for all analytes having concentrations higher than theMethod Detection Limit (MDL). Conduct positive confirmation by second-columnGC; however, gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) can be used forpositive confirmation if the quantity of each analyte to be confirmed is abovethe detection level of the GC/MS instrument. Analytes which cannot beconfirmed will be reported as "Not Detected" in the body of the report, butresults of all second-column GC or GC/MS confirmational analyses are to beincluded in the report appendix along with other raw analytical 4ata. Basethe quantification of confirmed analytes upon the first column analysis. Themaximum number of second-column confirmational analyses shall not exceed fiftypercent (50%) of the actual number of field samples (to include duplicates).The total number of samples for each GC method listed in Attachment 1 includesthis allowance. If GCMS, or a combination of second-column GC and GC/MS, isused, the total cost of all such analyses for a particular parameter shall notexceed the funding allowed for positive confirmation using only second-columnGC.
d. All chemical/physical analyses shall conform to state and
other applicable Federal and local regulatory agency legal requirements. If aregulatory agency specifies that a type of analysis be performed in acertified laboratory, assure compliance with the requirement and furnishdocumentation showing laboratory certification with the first analytical datasupplied to the USAFOEHL.
11. Decontamination Procedures:
a. Decontaminate all sampling equipment, including internalcomponents, prior to use and between samples to avoid cross contamination.Wash equipment with a laboratory-grade detergent followed by drinking qualitywater, solvent (methanol), and distilled water rinses. Allow sufficient timefor the solvent to evaporate and the equipment to dry completely.
b. Dedicate for each well the monofilament line or steel wireused to lower sampling equipment into the well; do not use a line in more thanone well. Decontaminate the calibrated water level probe for measuring wellvolume and water level elevation before use in each well.
c. Thoroughly clean and decontaminate the drilling rig and toolsbefore initial use and after each borehole completion. As a minimum, steamclean drill bits after each borehole is Installed. Drill from the "least" tothe "most" contaminated areas, if possible.
7
12. Conduct a literature search of local hydrogeologic conditions tocomplement the Phase I Report (mailed under separate cover). Use this data todetermine optimum well locations. Include the pertinent literature searchinformation in an appendix of the Final Report. Develop the literature searchdata using the following guideline:
a. Topographic data
b. Geologic data
(1) Structure
(2) Stratigraphy
(3) Lithology
c. Hydrogeologic data
(1) Location of all existing and abandoned wells, including
observation wells, and springs, natural ponds and seepages, that occur on oroff the installation within a one-mile radius of sites to be investigated
(2) Groundwater table and piezometric contours
(3) Depth to groundwater
(4) Surface and groundwater quality
(5) Recharge, discharge and contributing areas
(6) Geologic setting, yield and hydrographs of springs andnatural seepages
d. Data on all existing and abandoned wells, to include
observation holes,on or off the installation and within a one-mile radius ofsites to be investigated.
(1) Location, depth, diameter, types of wells, and logs
(2) Static and pumping water levels, hydrographs, yield andspecific capacity
(3) Present and projected groundwater development and use
(4) Corrosion, incrustation, well interference, and similaroperation and maintenance problems
(5) Observation well networks
(6) Existing water sampling sites
8
e. Aquifer data
(1) Type, such as unconfined, artesian, or perched
(2) Thickness, depths, and formational designation
(3) Boundaries
(4) Transmissivity, storativity, and permeability
(5) Specific retention
(6) Discharge and recharge
(7) Ground and surface water relationships
(8) Aquifer models
f. Climatic data
(1) Precipitation (total and net)
(2) Evapotranspiration
B. Specific Site Work
Attachment 3 is a base map showing the site locations. In addition toitems delineated in I.A. above, conduct the following specific actions at thesites listed below:
1. Sanitary Landfill
a. Install nine shallow (approximately 20 feet deep) well around
the perimeter of the landfill. Approximately locate the wells (SW 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 6, 7, 8 and 9) as shown on Attachment 4.
b. Perform three soil borings to a depth of 100 feet to determinelithology and geology around the landfill. Grout the lower 50 feet of eachboring with a bentonite/cement grout and convert the boreholes to deep(approximately 50 feet) wells. Screen a maximum of 10 feet of the deepwells. Approximately locate the wells (DW 1, 2, and 3) as shown on Attachment4 and as follows:
(1) One well collocated with the shallow well installed onthe north edge of landfill.
.(2) One well collocated with the shallow well on the eastedge of the landfill in the drainage channel.
(3) One well collocated with the shallow well installedbetween the sewage lagoon and the landfill.
9
C. Collect a groundwater sample from each of the 12 new wells andfrom the four existing groundwater monitoring wells in the landfill (16 watersamples).
d. Collect a maximum of four surface water samples from anystanding water in the landfill or from the landfill drainage channel whichflows off base. If the water is flowing in the drainage channel, take adischarge measurement.
e. Analyze water samples for petroleum hydrocarbons, aromaticvolatile organics, halogenated volatile organics, 13 priority pollutantmetals, extractable priority organic pollutants (GC/MS), total dissolvedsolids (TDS), and common anions.
2. Firefighter Training Area (FTA).
a. Install four wells (approximately 30 feet deep) equally spacedaround the perimeter of the FTA.
b. Perform one soil boring in the center of the fire trainingarea to a depth of 30 feet. Collect four soil samples for chemical analysisfrom the boring, based on HNU or OVA meter readings, odor, discoloration orother indicators of contamination.
c. Collect three sediment samples for chemical analysis in theditch draining the FTA. Take samples to a depth of one foot at the followinglocations: the effluent side of the culvert in the ditch near the FTA, justinside the base boundary where the ditch leaves the base, and at a point ofsuspected contamination selected in the field.
d. Collect a groundwater sample from each well.
e. Analyze those soil/sediment samples selected for chemicalanalysis for petroleum hydrocarbons, aromatic volatile organics, halogenatedvolatile organics, and lead.
f. Analyze water samples for petroleum hydrocarbons, aromatic
volatile organics, halogenated volatile organics, and lead.
3. Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Area.
a. Perform one 20 foot soil boring in a location specified by theBase POC. Collect two soil samples during boring based on HNU or OVA meterreadings, odor, discoloration or other indicators of contamination.
b. Analyze the soil samples for petroleum hydrocarbons and 13priority pol~utant metals.
4. Background Sampling
a. To determine background water quality, sample the existingCorps of Engineers well once. Analyze the sample for halogenated and aromatic
10
volatile organics, petroleum hydrocarbons, 13 priority pollutant metals, total
dissolved solids, and common anions.
C. Health and Safety
Comply with USAF, OSHA, EPA, state and local health and safetyregulations regarding the proposed work effort. Use EPA guidelines fordesignating the appropriate levels of protection at study sites. Prepare awritten Health and Safety Plan for the proposed work effort and coordinate itdirectly with applicable regulatory agencies prior to commencing fieldoperations. Provide an information copy of the Health and Safety Plan to theUSAFOEHL after coordination with regulatory agencies. The Health and SafetyPlan is specified in Sequence No. 7, Item VI below.
D. Technical Operations Plan
Immediately after the Notice To Proceed (NTP) for the delivery order,develop a Technical Operations Plan (TOP) based on the technical requirementsspecified in this task description. (See Sequence No. 20, Item VI, below).Follow the TOP format (mailed under separate cover). Provide the TOP to theUSAFOEHL within two weeks of the NTP.
E. Data Review
1. Tabulate field and analytical laboratory results, including fieldand laboratory parameters and QA/QC data, as they become available andincorporate them into the next monthly R&D Status Report (Sequence No. 1, ItemVI below) forwarded to the USAFOEHL. In addition to the results, report thefollowing:
a. the time and dates for sample collection, extraction (ifapplicable) and analysis;
b. the method used and Method Detection Limits achieved;
c. the Chain-of-Custody forms;
d. a cross-reference of laboratory sample numbers to field samplenumbers; and
e. a cross-reference of field sample numbers to wells, boreholes,sites, etc.
2. Upon completion of all analyses, tabulate and incorporate allresults into an Informal Technical Information Report (Sequence No. 3, ItemVI, below) and forward the report to USAFOEHL for review a minimum of twoweeks prior o submission of the draft report. Provide as a minimum theinformation specified in I.E.1. above.
3. Immediately report to the USAFOEHL Program Manager or hissupervisor via telephone, data/results generated during this investigationwhich indicate a potential health risk (for example, a contaminated drinking
11
water aquifer). Follow the telephone notification with a written noticewithin three days; attach a copy of the laboratory raw data (i.e.,chromatogram).
F. Reporting
1. Prepare a draft report delineating all findings of this fieldinvestigation and forward it to the USAFOEHL (as specified in Sequence No. 4,Item VI, below) for Air Force review and comment. Strictly adhere to theUSAFOEHL report format (mailed under separate cover). The format is anintegral part of this delivery order. Draft reports are considered "drafts"only in the sense that they have not been reviewed and approved by Air Forceofficials. In all other respects, "drafts" must be complete, in the properformat, and free of grammatical and typographical errors. Include adiscussion of the regional/site specific hydrogeology, well and boring logs,data from water level surveys, ground water surface and gradient maps, waterquality and soil analysis results, available geohydrologic cross sections, andlaboratory and field QA/QC information. Follow the USAFOEHL supplied format(mailed under separate cover). For states requiring the field work ortechnical effort be supervised by a state registered geologist, engineeringgeologist or professional engineer, insert this information in the report toinclude registration numbers, certificate and seals (as appropriate).
2. Review the IRP Phase I report. Integrate the Phase I informationwith the investigative work done at each site to date so the report reflectsthe total cumulative information for each site studied in this effort.
3. In the results section, include water and soil analyses resultsand field quality control sample data. Report all internal laboratory qualitycontrol data (lab blanks, lab spikes, and lab duplicates), and laboratoryquality assurance information in an appendix of the report. Provide second-column confirmation results and quantities, and include which columns wereused, instrument operating conditions and retention times. Summarize in theappendix the specific collection technique, analytical method (StandardMethods, EPA, etc.), holding time, and limit of detection for each analyte.
4. Make estimates of the magnitude, extent and direction whichdetected contaminants are moving. Identify potential environmentalconsequences of discovered contamination based upon state or Federalstandards.
5. Plot and map all field data collected for each site according tosurveyed positions.
6. In the recommendation section, address each site and list them bycategory:
a. Category I consists of sites where no further action(including remedial action) is required. Data for these sites are consideredsufficient to rule out unacceptable public health or environmental hazards.
12
b. Category II sites are those requiring an additional Phase Ii
effort to determine the direction, magnitude, rate of movement and extent ofdetected contaminants. Identify potential environmental consequences ofdiscovered contamination, where known.
c. Category III sites are those that will require remedial
actions (ready for IRP Phase IV). In the recommendations for Category IIIsites, include any possible influence on sites in Categories I and/or 1I due
to their connection with the same hydrological system. Clearly state anydependency between sites in different categories. Include a list of candidateremedial action alternatives, including Long Term Monitoring (LTM) as remedialaction, and the corresponding rationale that should be considered in selecting
the remedial action for a given site. List all alternatives that couldpotentially bring the site into compliance with environmental standards. Forcontaminants that do not have standards, EPA recommended safe levels fornoncarcinogens (Health Advisory or Suggested-No-Adverse-Response Levels) and
target levels for carcinogens (1 x 10-G cancer risk level) may be used.Unless specifically requested, do not perform comprehensive cost analyses, or
cost/benefit review for remedial action alternatives. However, in thosesituations where field survey data indicate immediate corrective action isnecessary, present specific, detailed recommendations.
For each category above, summarize the results of field data,
environmental or regulatory criteria, or other pertinent informationsupporting conclusions and recommendations.
7. Provide cost estimates by line item for future efforts recommended
for Category II sites and LTM Category III sites. Submit these estimates
concurrently with the approved Final Report in a separate document. Only the
cost requirements outlined in Sequence No. 2, Item VI, need be submitted.
a. For Category II sites, develop detailed site-specific
estimates using prioritized costing format (i.e., cost of conducting therequired work on: the highest priority site only; the first two highestpriority sites only; the first three highest priority sites only; etc., untilall required work is discretely costed) for the proposed work effort. The Air
Force determines the priority of sites from contractor recommendations.Consider the type of contaminants, their magnitude, the direction and rate of
their migration, and their subsequent potential for environmental and health
consequences when developing recommendations for site prioritization.
b. For Category III sites slated for long-term monitoring,
develop site-specific estimates which detail the costs associated with: (1)permanent installation of monitoring wells; (2) ground water sampling
interface equipment, including permanent installations of pumps and samplinglines; and (3) four quarterly (1 year period) sample collections andlaboratory chemical analyses of ground water, etc.
8. Provide an inventory of all on-base wells, to include production,irrigation, monitoring, etc. If the well has been abandoned, then state thereason.
13
9. Reference in an appendix any local, state and/or Federalregulations which require specific well drilling techniques, materials, welldevelopment, purging, and sampling methods for work specified in this effort.
G. Meetings
The contractor's project leader shall attend three meeting(s) to takeplace at a time to be specified by the USAFOEHL. Each meeting shall takeplace at Minot AFB for a duration of one eight-hour day.
II. SITE LOCATION AND DATES:
Minot AFB NDDate to be established
III. BASE SUPPORT:
A. Prior to any contractor digging or drilling, the Base Civil EngineerPOC will locate underground utilities and issue digging permits..
B. The Base Civil Engineer will assign accumulation points within theinstallation for the contractor to use to deliver any drill cuttings or wellinstallation/development fluids generated from the required work which aresuspected to be hazardous.
C. The Base Civil Engineer will take custody of any drill cuttings orwell installation/development fluids suspected to be hazardous and properlydispose of the material according to applicable state/Federal regulations.
D. The Base will provide the contractor with existing engineering plans,drawings, diagrams, aerial photographs, etc., to evaluate sites underinvestigation.
E. The Base POC will select 10% of the split samples provided by thecontractor, package them, and ensure they are picked up by the contractorwithin 24 hours of sample receipt by the POC. See paragraph I.A.9.h.
F. The Base will arrange for and have available prior to the start-up offield work, the following services, materials, work space, and items ofequipment to support the contractor conducting the survey:
1. Personnel identification badges and vehicle passes and/or entrypermits.
2. A staging area for storage of equipment and supplies.
3. supply (i.e., fire hydrant) for large quantities (up to amaximum of 1,000 gallons) of potable water to be used in equipment cleaning,etc.
4. A household-type refrigerator having approximately two cubic feet
of freezer space for storage of blue ice.
14
IV. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY: None
V. GOVERNMENT POINTS OF CONTACT:
1. USAFOEHL Program Monitor 2. Base Point of Contact (POC)
Capt Patrick N. Johnson Capt David DeMayUSAFOEHL/TSS USAF Regional Hosp Minot/SGPBBrooks AFB TX 78235-5501 Minot AFB ND 58705-5300(512) 536-2158 (701) 727-3398AV 240-2158/2159 AV 344-33981-800-821-4528
3. MAJCOM Monitor 4. Base Civil Engineer POC
Lt Col John Pontier Mr John L. BoucherHQ SAC/SGPB 91st CSG/DEEVE
Offutt AFB NE 68113-5001 Minot AFB ND 58705-5300(402) 294-4651 (701) 727-3691AV 271-4651 AV 344-3691
VI. In addition to sequence numbers 1, 5 and 11 listed in Attachment 1 to thecontract, and which apply to all orders, the sequence numbers listed below areapplicable to this order. Also shown are dates applicable to this order.
Sequence No. Para No. Block 10 Block 11 Block 12 Block 13 Block 14
20 (TOP)* I.D. OTIME 86SEP26 86SEP29 15
7 (Health & I.C. OTIME 86SEP26 865EP27 3Safety)
3 (Prelim I.E.2 OTIME *1 3Data)
4 (Tech. I.F. ONE/R 87JAN30 87FEB13 87NOV13 '
Rpt)
2 (Cost I.F.7. OTIME 87FEB13 87NOV13
Data)
14 MONTHLY 860CT14 86OCT31 3
15 MONTHLY 860CT14 860CT31 3
*The Technica Operations Plans (TOP) required for this stage is due within
two (2) weeks of the Notice to Proceed (NTP).
**Upon completion of the total analytical effort before submission of the
first draft report.
15
***Two draft reports (25 copies of each) and one final report (50 copies plusthe original camera ready copy) are required. Incorporate Air Force commendsinto the second draft and final reports as specified by the USAFOEHL. Supplythe USAFOEHL with an advance copy of the first draft, second draft, and finalreports for acceptance prior to distribution. Distribute remaining 24 copiesof each draft report and 49 copies of the final report as specified by theUSAFOEHL.
****Submit cost estimates (five copies) in a separately bound document withthe Final Report only. Provide estimates for only those sites recommended foradditional Phase II work (Category II) or Phase IV, Long Term Monitoring,(Category III).
*****Submit monthly hereafter.
16
Attachment I
Analytical Methods, Detection Limits, and Number of Samples
DETECTIRN NO. OF TOTALPARAMETER METHOD LIMIT SAMPLES QA1 SAMPLES
Halogenated SW5030/SW8010 a 7 soil 1 soil 12 soilVolatileOrganics EPA 601 a 25 water 4 water 45 watere
Aromatic SW5030/8020 a 7 soil 1 soil 12 soilfVolatileOrganics SW5030/8020 a 25 water 4 water 45 water g
ExtractablePriorityPollutants(GC/MS) EPA 625 a 20 water 3 water 23 water
Petroleum SW3550/EPA 418.1 1 mg/kg 9 soil 1 soil 10 soilHydrocarbons
EPA 418.1 1 mg/L, 50 water 8 water 58 waterwater
Total Dissolved EPA 160.1 10 *g/L, 21 water 3 water 24 waterSolids (TDS) water
Priority EPA 200.7 c 21 water 3 water 24 waterPollutant SW 3050/SW6010 c 2 soil I soil 3 soilMetals (13 ea.) EPA 245.1 (Hg) c 21 water 3 water 24 water
SW7471 (Hg) c 2 soil 1 soil 3 soilEPA 206.2 (As) c 21 water 3 water 24 waterSW3050/SW7060(As) c 2 soil 1 soil 3 soilEPA 270.2 (Se) a 21 water 3 water 24 waterSW3050/SW7740(Se) a 2 soil 1 soil 3 soil
Lead 5W3050/7120 10 mg/kg 7 soil 1 soil 8 soil
E239.2 0.002 mg/L 4 water 2 water 6 water
Common Anions A429 0.1 mg/L 21 water 3 water 24 water
pH (Field Test) -- 25 water -- 25 water
Temperature -- 25 water 25 water(Field Test)
Conductance -- 25 water 25 water(Field Test)
Ep Toxicity SW Manual b 10 soil 3 soil 13 soil(Metals)
a. Detection limits as specified by the applicable EPA or Standard Method; report
results in ug/L for water samples and mg/kg for soil samples.
b. Metal mg/L leaching solution
As 0.002Ba 0.1Cd 0.005Cr 0.05Pb 0.1Hg 0.0002Se 0.002Ag 0.01
DETECTION LIMITC. Metal Water(mg/L) Soil/Sedlment(mg/kg)
Sb 0.032 3.2As 0.001 0.1Be 0.0003 0.03Cd 0.004 0.4Cr 0.007 0.7Cu 0.006 0.6Pb 0.042 4.2Hg 0.0002 0.1Ni 0.015 1.5Se 0.002 0.2Ag 0.007 0 7TI 0.040 4.0Zn 0.002 0.2
d. Total of 12 includes second column confirmation for 50% of the samples (4).
e. Total of 45 includes second column confirmation for 50% of the samples (15).
f. Total of 12 includes second column confirmation of 50% of the samples (4).
g. Total of 45 includes second column confirmation of 50% of the samples (15).
h. Report results of all soil sample analyses as mg/kg of dry soil. Report the soilmoisture content of each sample.
i. QA includes a 10% increase for field duplicates and a 5% increase for field blanks(water samples only).
18
Attachment 2
Sampling and Analytical RequirementsMinot AFB SD
Soil
0 0
00 a 0$ s 0 a
FTA 7 7
EOD2 2
Total 7 7 9 2 7
19
-- ,- -, , i l a 0
Attachment 2
Sampling and Analytical RequirementsMinot AFB SD
Water
C. 0
o go A..M00 CO. -0
ccC M j t 0 0 0 OC4 zW0 x 0 0 1.
Sani taryLandf il 1U 20 20 40 20 20 20 20 20 20
FTA O4 i 4 8 4 4
C/E Well 1 1 2 1 1 I
Total 25 25 20 50 21 21 21 25 25 25
20
APPENDIX C
WELL NUMBERING SYSTEM
(CL5O6OB/0528N)
C. Well Numbering System
A well numbering system was used to identify each well constructedduring the on-site remedial investigation. A unique number was assigned
to each well and listing of well numbers was maintained by the HART fieldteam leader. The system is described below.
Well Identification
Each well was identified by a two-letter identifier code, with thefollowing prefix:
SW - Shallow Well (less than 30 feet in depth)
DW - Deep Well (greater than 30 feet in depth)
A numerical suffix unique to each prefix follows.
Example
SW-l. Shallow monitoring well No. 1.
(0528n-8)
APPENDIX D
GEOLOGICAL LOGS
(CL5O6OB/0528N)
APPENDIX D.1
HART TEST BORING LOGS
(CL5O6OB/0528N)
.1 -1
PROJECT NAME: 1EAF-4AFB - -_- " .
DATE DRILLED: L0/15/86 BORING NU 1E: SA:DRILLING LOCATION Landfill - 2REDLE .3A:; 1-.:1 .-2. -
ON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. eVi::ezi J. vol. TILLING COJPANY: T,:- 'it Test:-
DRILLING METhOD: Holow Flignt Auger , '. 'NTALzED: -
jSample'Sample Sample; Met:.c J ?is Recov. I..
Number! Depth Depth ' ' per In, PM ePec , n : Ec Sample S° cf e a
WM-1 4_, St
..DW2-i2 .. ....... . . -0.6: sandy . pi: ;. . .. . .. ... .. . ..... ... .. . ... ... . . .. .. ... .. ...y ... .. ... 0. -- 6- tr:wn-gray- s.syt
.....-....-............................... . . . . ... -.. .
; 2 .i 7 :±ay wifn trace c sano
.. ... ........... ....... : 5: gray-tr r si ty ay;
B , 8 ' . -i 8: i t.: c,,wr, san.: an:S.. . .. . .... ................ .......... ....... ... . .... .... ........ ......... ......... ...... .......... ..... ...... ........ . .... ....... ............ ........ ...... ...... . .. . . . ... . ... .. ..... - 9 - . w "a n -n
gave. w:tr trace :' ::stDk -- 8U - .. 0 ' i ' f rown sandy silt;
i I I ens of med. to fn... -.....-. . - - --..... . a+ 0 .2.
: :-s - i + '. 2;+r.- - - + ;T
..... . ....... .... -..: z... san: L s tt me:. E
.... . ..... .... . ... . .. . . .i brown sanc , ra .
<i(') s rs. sane an: gravel.""C ij 4! 1.0 -7: orange-orcwn SC.
..... ,a ; ,. .,. s.. .y
S ' : t : ay . : :-. sane: pecois...W - .... ... ... ... ..... - . , a w i t. .
I .. , = s : t: S an: peoties......... .... ... ... . .. ... ..- " " w i t
4,
71 ' I - -r
.1K:-U( " : ' ,' I -0.4: c gqray sy ay;
• • • n nn I I I I I
D.1-2
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/9/86 BORING NUMBER: SW3
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1638.07 ft. isiON S!TE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-3
Sample:Sample Sample: Method: Blows Recov.: O.V.A.: FNumber: Depth Depth: of : per Ft.: ppm e
:Begin End Sample: 6' of eFt. Ft. :Collect: Drive : t Visual Classification
SW3-1: 0: 2: SS: 2, 31 0.5: 0; [ML] Brown to dark brown topsoil.' I I I 4 : i I
a a a 41 a a 4 I
SW3-2: 5: 7: SS: 4: 1.8: 0: 5 Pion silty clay, with
S5: i occasional orange mottlinga8: and pebbles.
12: iI7
_W33 : .. . 12. SS: 41 .6; 10 Same as above.
SW3-2; 7:11 11. : a : 0 5 Soe asi clyv w
........ " .... i ... ..... .... .... .... .. .._: .....L _ _ .... .... .... .i .... ........ .... ..... .... .....
S 8: :0 0; 0 S a
a a I L i a , a
aW-6 24 a S 7; NM a, a2 a cly a bo e wt
.... ........ .. ........ .. ....... ...... . ...... -- ... ... .. ............ ..... ............ I.. .....- 1... .......... ....... .. .. I3
a SW3a... .....
5-4: 10, 12, SS, 4, 2.0 :. . . O 10 Same as above.
a aa o a n s e a a aS. . . .a .. a.a.a
. . . . C t u . a ext a
a a a a *a aaa5 a I
a a a a a a a a a a [a a a a a a a.aa.. 1
, a a a a a a a
. . . .1 17 SS 61 .0 a : 15SmasboeIW- ; " 4 a S 7 N'I' a a a a; a e c a b v , w ta..... . . . . a.. . a_ a . ....... ... .... ........ ... a.. .......... .... ... ...... a 1.. ... .... ...... .. .. ..... ... .... . ....... ...a , a a a a a a a c a ~ n l s n e s s
aLa a ant5nuad an aex aa
. .. . . aI ~ ~ a a aI I I aI aI aI Ia
D.1-3
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/9/86 BORING NUMBER: SW3
DRILLING LOCATION Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1638.07 ft. islON SITE GEOLOGIST V. DeViIlez/ J. Yolz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-3
Sample:Sample Sample: Method: Blows Recov. O.V.A. FNumber: epth Depth of : per Ft. pp e
Begin End Saple: 6' of: eFt. Ft. :Collect: Drive : t Visual Classification
I 171 23
5:25
. . .. .. .. ....... . . . . ..------ .n.. ..................... 2 5I I I I===Now
D.1-4
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/17/86 BORING NUMBER: SW5
DRILLING LOCATION Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1632.54 ft. aslON SITE GEOLOGIST B. Macke/ J Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger NELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-5
Sample:Sample Sample! Method: Blows Recov.1 O.V.A.: FNumber! Depth Depth : of 1 per : Ft. 1 ppm I e
Begin End 1 Sample ' of : eFt. Ft. ICollect: Drive : : : t Visual Classification
SW5-I: 0! 2: SS: 4, 12: 1.5: o : [ML] 0 -0.6: dark brown topsoil.i 14: 1 I 0.6 -1.5: gray, medium sand
1 141 ' . I and gravel.SW5-2: 2: 4: SS: 6: 1.3: i : 1 O 2 0 -1.2: brown, medium to
6: : 1 : coarse sand and pebbles._ _i 4_ i 1 1 __ 3 1.2 -1.3: It. gray clayeyS* I 4: 1 silt.
SW5-3: 41 6: SS: 3i 1.6: o 01 4 0-0.1:brn silt; 0.2-0.3:brn6: : i silty sand; 0.3-0.7:brn silty
I i 5: 5 clay; 0.7-0.9:fn silty sand;
7 0.9-1.6: sandy silt.SU5-4: 65 8l SS. 21 2.01 1 11 01 6 Lt gray silty clay with
5: : : : orange mottling, traceI6: : ____ 7 of pebbles and a few micro-it: i sand lenses.
Su5-5: 8: 10 SS: 51 1.8: 0 ; 0: 8 0 -0.2: same clay as above;4: : : : 1 1 0.2 -0.7: fn. brn. sand with61 i : : 9 trace of silt; 0.7 -1.8: brn.
i 9 9: : I sit clay w/ tr sand & pebblesSW5-6: to: 12: SS: 3: 2.0: : 1 O! t0 Same clay as above.
I : 1 : : : : 1
SWS-7 121 14: SS: 3: 2.01 : 1 0 12 0 -0.7: fn brown sand with:i i 4; little silt.
7: : : I : 13 0.7 -2.0: brown silty clay.1 9 I 8l : : _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _
SW5-8: 14: 161 SS: 3: 2.01 o: 0O 14 (CL] Dark brown to gray silty9 7: : : 1 clay with trace of sand
____ 8: : : :15 and pebbles.i 13: :
SW5-9: 16: is: SS: 4: 2.0: o: 16 Same as above.
6:: i 8: 17
S 9 I 1: : : : 18
m 9 m I m I.9
D.1-5
PROJECT NAME: USAF-NAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/16/86 BORING NUMBER: SW6
DRILLING LOCATION Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1643.41 ft. eslON SITE GEOLOGIST B. Macke/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger VELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-6
Sasple!Sample 1 Sample: Method, Blows Recov. O.V.A.1 FNumber! Depth 1 Depth 1 of : per Ft. ppm : e
Begin 1 End 1 Sample: 6' of eFt. : Ft. :Collect: Drive 1 t Visual Classification
SW6-1: o: 21 SS: 2, 7: 0.5: O! [ML] Dark brown to black topsoil.a 6 I (hit rock)
* 17:SW6-2: 2: 4: SS! 2! 1.1 01 2 0 -0.7: same as above.
i 1: i :0.7 -1.1: dark brown clayey2: i i 3 silt with root material.
5u6-3: 4: 6: SS: 1: 1.3: 0! 4 0 -0.5: same as above.S: 0.5 -1.3: It. gray clay with2: 5 trace of silt.
S56-4: 6: 8! SS: 2! 1.6: : : o: 6 Same clay as above; aa a a : 2: : a white, medium to coarse sand
i : 4: : i 7 lens at 1.5.
5W6-5: 81 10: SS: 31 2.0: : 0: 8 Medium gray clay with littlei 4: : . : silt and sand.
: : : 8: :
SW6-6: 10i 12: SS: 21 2.0: ' : o: 1O Same as above.
* : * a: * * a 11
SW6-7: 121 14: Ss: 4 1.6: I : 0.5: 12 Same as above with traces of5: i lignite and orange mottling
S 1: * ___ __0__ 13 in places.
i 12:a aaSW6-81 14: 161 SS: 41 2.0: * : : O: 14 Same clay as above.
to: 15: : 5
a a a a 12:SW6-9: 16! 181 SS: 3: 2.0. 01 16 Same clay as above with more
i 6a a silt in places.
a a a 9: a 17
SW6-10L 18: 20: SS: 5: 2.0 O 18 CLI Dark gray silty clay withSa a8a trace of sand and pebbles.
a a a 12: 19I I I 131
I l l l21
a a 2 : : a2
Log Continued on Next Page
D.1-6
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/16/96 BORING NUMBER: SW6
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1643.41 ft. islON SITE GEOLOGIST : B. Mackel J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLFD: SW-6
Sample:Sample : Sample! Method: Blows 1 Recov. : O.Y.A.: FNumber: Depth 1 Depth : of : per Ft. : pp. e
:fBegin : End 1 Sample! of: : of eFt.Ft. t. :Collect: Drive t Visual Classification
SW6-11: 23: 25: SS: 5 2.0 : 0: 23 ,- Dark gray silty clay withSi 8: i . , trace of sand and pebbles.i 8: i : 24I I I0I .
25 /,/,
I I I2S ,-I.I. ..6I III I I.. ..
I I I 27I I I I"
SWI-2: 28: 301 SS: 7I 2.01 iO 28 Same as above.
I I I . . .
to: 29.
I I I I . ,
I I I 0 .
I I I I ...- ,
I I I 32..//
SW6-13 33: 35 SS: 2 2.0: 0 33 Same as above.
I II ."/"
S 8I 34 /
i 35,..
I I I I .. 29
i i _ 3610... ,.
11I I , ....
S I 37 ....3
* I I I I I I , ,, .
SW6-14I 381 401 SS: 3: 2.01 0;O_ 38 Same as above.
I I 8 I I I 39 .. .I I 3I I I....... •.
I I I I I I 4 ... .... ..
I I I I I I .- .- .
I I I I I .... ....
S I I I 42
I I I I I I I ....I....... ,
SW6-15! 43: 45: SS: 4 1.6: i O! 43 Same as above.
I I I I LI I I I II... -
S1 I4 I I
II I I I4I I I I II ..............
]. I ,[ I I ; I I I I I.... ..... ..
Log Continued on NexI Page
I II I I I 3
D.1-7
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/16/86 BORING NUMBER: SW6
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1643.41 ft. aslON SITE GEOLOGIST : B. Mackel J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-6
SamplelSample Sample! Method: Blows Recov.: O.V.A.: FNumber: Depth Depth of : per Ft. ppm : e
Begin End Sample: 6' of I eFt. Ft. ICollect: Drive i t Visual Classification
: 47 ..
I I I.....I ,. I I
SW6-16: 49,' so: SS! 5: 2.01 0 : 48 ..... .1 Same as above; 1.7 -2.0:
: : : 1: :: : ..... . . dark brown to black, medium
: 101 ,: 49 ./ to coarse sand with someSI 211 i lignite.
: : : : : : : : 50 /
* , , I I m
D.1-8
PROJECT NAME: USAF-NAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/22/86 BORING NUNBER: SW7
DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: Not SurveyedON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: None
Sample!Sasple Sample. flethod: Blows Recov.: O.V.A.: FNumber: Depth Depth of : per Ft. 1 pp.1 e
:Begin: End lSampe 6" of 1 I eFt. 1 Ft. :Collect; Drive i i t Visual Classification
SW7-11 O: 21 SS: 3, 5: 0.81 0: [ML] 0 -0.5: dk brn silty topsoil;i i 41 1 0.5 -0.8: It brn silty clay.
597-2: 51, 71' SS: 2: 0.9: 1251 5 Brn silty clay with trace of3! sand and pebbles and small
: : : 6: 6 ((.1') lenses of fn. to med.i 8! sand; sand, and in some cases
: : : 7 clay, is stained black & has2a distictive odor.
a7-3, t0: 121 SS" 21 1.8! 300: to Same (clay & sand) as above;
a 3: sand is at 1.6; sample
a6: i It has same discoloration and
Sa aodor as above.
: 12
: : 13
SV7-4: 15: 171 SS: 3: 2.01 o 15 Brown silty clay with tracea a a 31 : : of sandand pebbles
: : : 51 i 16
: : : l 17
a a a a :1
S a a a : 6(1) d19
597-5: 20: 22: SS: 2: 2.01 O: 20 ["CL] Dark gray silty clay withS a 2: : a trace of sand and pebbles.
S51 21: : l : 6 :
: : : : : : 22
Log Continued on Next Page
a a a a a a I
D.1-9
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFO PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/22/86 BORING NUMBER: S97
DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: Not SurveyedON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger VELL(S) INSTALLED: None
Sample:Sample Sample: Method! Blows Recov.: O.VA. FNumber: Depth Depth I of : per Ft. ppm e
Begin End : Samplel V of eFt. Ft. !Collect! Drive I t Visual Classification
1 24
SW7-61 25: 271 SS. 3 1.8 ol 25 Sate as above.I I I I : :/ .. /.
i 7" .- 26
S27 I I
D. -10
PROJECT MANE: USAF-AF8 PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/23/86 BORING NUMBER: SWB
DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1651.33 ft. mslON SITE GEOLO6ST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMlPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-8
,SaspleiSample ' Sample. Methodl Blows Recov.. O.V.A.4 FNumber! Depth 1 Depth 1 of 1 per Ft. * ppm e
fBegin End 1 Sample! 6' of : eFt. Ft. !Collect! Drive t Visual Classification
Sw8-i: o: 2: SS: 3, 5: 0.8: 0: (ML] Lt. to dk. brown silty4: 1 topsoil with trace of pebbles5: i and organic matter.
I I I I2
SW8-21 5: 71 SS" 2,' 1.41 Nfli 5 Lt. brown silty clay withi 4: i trace of sand and pebbles.
:4 6 : 7
SW9-31 7: 9: SS: 31 2.0: i N" 7 Same as above.
i i 5: i i
SW8-4: 9: 11: SS: 5: 2.01 NMI, 9 Same as above.I I I 5: i
S I-5: It: 131 SS. 41 1.01 NM: It Same as above with some
6 : i i orange mottling.
I 81 1 12 II
SW8-6: 13: 151 SS: 41 2.0. NN: 13 Lt. brown silty clay with: : : : 5: trace of sand and pebbles.
I I I I I I 14
SW8-7: 15: 17i SSi 51 2.01 H M 15 0 -1.0: same as above;i 8: i 1.0 -2.0: clay is grading to
I 11 121 16 a gray clay.
SWD-8: 17: 19: SS: 41 2.0: NN: 17 Gray silty clay with traceI 7: i i of sand and pebbles and
el i le 8 : 1 orange mottling.I I I I 12 :
SU8-g2 19i 21: Ss: 3 2.0: NM: 19 CL t Dk. gray silty clay with* 1, 4 * trace of sand and pebbles.
: 9:: 9 : 20
I I I0I
:2i:2 5 2
Log Continued on Next Page
* I
D.-i
PROJECT MANE: USAF-MAFI PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00
DATE DRILLED: 10/23/86 BORING NUMBER: SWB
DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1651.33 ft. asiON SITE GEOLOGIST ; V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: SM-B
Saeple:Sample Sample: Method: Blows :Recov.: : O.V.A.: FNumber.'Depth ieptn. of 'per Ft. ppam e
Begin: End :Sample 6'of: : :Ft. Ft. !Collect: Drive i t Visual Classification
SUB-101 24: 261 SS" 4' 2.0, i NM: 24 ., same as above.
7: 1
264 4 I 4I 4 IX
* 4 I 4 I 4 2 7
sws-ii: 28: 30: ss: 4: 2.0: : NM: 28 Same as above.
10:4 30
D.1-12
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFD PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/23/86 BORING NUMBER: SW9
DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. B9REHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1650.22 ft. as1ON SITE 6EOLO6IST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLINC COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: 3W-9
Sample:Sample 1 Sample: Method! Blows 1 Recov.: O.V.A.i FNumber: Depth : Depth 1 of 1 per Ft. 1 ppm : e
:Begin : End ! Sample: 6' of eFt. 1 Ft. :Collect: Drive 1 i t Visual Classification
sW9-l: o: 2: SS: 4, 10: 1.51 : [MLI 0 -0.5:dk brn silty topsoil;a: : * : i 1 0.5 -1.5: It brn silty clay
i 7: i with trace of sand & pebbles;i : : : : 2 lens of fine, brown sand* I I I I I II from 0.8 -1.0.
i i i 3
* ~~ 4
SW9-21 5: 7: SS: 21 1.5: i >1000: 5 Lt. brown silty cloy withi 4: : a trace of sand and pebbles; Ii 41 i 1 6 cobble and tip of spoon
61 : : had black stained sand.SW9-31 7: 9: SS: 2: 1.9 : 800: 7 Same (silty clay) as above;
1 41' :1 : sand increases from trace* 5: 1 * 8 to some in patchy areas.
* ::: 8SW9-4; 9: It: SS: 4: 2.0: >O00: 9 Same as above.
I I I Al I I II0
i i; toaI
i 9: *I
Sw9-5: 11: 13: SS: 6i 2.01 :1 90: 11 Same as above with more9: 9 : : cobbles.12: i : 12
1 : : : 27: : iSW9-6: 13: 15: Ss: 4 2.0; i 1 1-2: 13 Lt. brn. fn. silty sand with
4 : i 4: : silty clay layers at 1.25 to5i ___ 14 1.4 and 1.85 to 1.9.
SW9-7: 15: 17: SS: 31 2.01 3: 15 Non-uniform alternating ofi 41 : silty fine sands and silty
a a : _ 16 clays with pebbles and Ia 13: : : large cobble.
SW9-8: 17: 19: SS: 61 1.61 9i 17 Lt. brown, silty, fine sandsa a 8a * a8* with some pebbles & cobbles.
i 14: : : 18* 14:
SW9-9: 19: 21; SS: 7: 2.0: : o: 19 0 -0.4:fn. to med. silty brn.a a : : : sand with some pebbles;
5 : 20 0.4 -2.0: brn. silty clay* : : : 6: : : with some sand and pebbles.
SW9-10: 21: 23: ss8 3: 1.5: O: 21 Lt. brown to gray silty clay4: : with some sand and trace of
i 7: : 22 pebbles.a * a 7C : o N age
Log Continued on Next Page
D.1-13
PROJECT NAME: USAF-IAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/23/86 BORING NUMBER: SW9
DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1650.22 ft. IslON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLIN6 METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: SW-9
Sasple:Sample : Sample: Method: Blows : Recov.: O.V.A.: FNumber! Depth Depth 1 of : per : Ft. : : ppm: e
8egin. End I Sampie. 6' oi e1 Ft. 1 Ft. :Collect: Drive : : : : t Visual Classification
SW9-11: 23: 251 SS: 41 21 1 7-8, 23 . (CL] Dark gray silty clay with6: : . " trace of sand and pebbles.
______ ; l3 : : : 25
D.1-14
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/7-8/86 BGRIN6 NUMBER: DW(see note on D. 1-18)
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1632.21 ft mslON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Mud Rotory WELL(S) INSTALLED: Dg-I, SW-2
Sample:Sample : Samplel Method: Blows : Recoy.: : O.V.A.: FNumber! Depth : Depth 1 of 1 per 1 Ft. a a pps 1 e
Begin 1 End 1 SapIl: 6' of 1 : e: Ft. ! Ft. !Collect! Drive 1 t Visual Classification
DW-I: O! 21 SSI 2, 31 0.7: : : Ol (ML] Gray-tan silty clay_ _ _ _ _41 w__ I with black organic layer
6! i from 0.2 -0.4
DWI-21 51, 7: SS" 3: 1.71 : O 5 Light brown to gray silty: : : : 41 , clay; mottled.
OWI-31' 101, 12', SS, 5: 1.7: i i 0: 10 grown silty clay with: G:: 6: orange mottling; slightly
13.1 it : 1 moist; trace of: 12: : pebbles (01/49).
: : : 12
,, : , : : : 14
DWI-4'. 15: 1711 SS: 5: 2.0,' 0 : 15 7- CL] Dark gray silty clay with7 1 minor orange mottling and
*101 i 1. trace of large pebbles
: : : 121 0 .. (19.
a a a I I I : ..
: : : : : : : 18 ..
DO-1 20. 221 SS 3 1' 1.1 ii 2 aea boe rc fsn
I I I I I I a a ..
DM1-I 50 22: ss: 31 1.7:O: 2 ... Light abon t rayeo silty
61c . and pebbles.9: 21/
:~~~ i 22 ,
Log Continued on Next Page
D.1-15
PROJECT NANE: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/7-8/86 BORING NUMBER: DWl (see note on D.1-18)
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1632.21 ft eslON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Tvin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Mud Rotory WELL(S) INSTALLED: OW-I, SW-2
SamplelSample : Sample: Method: Blows Recov : I O.V.A.: FNumbers Depth Depth I of : per Ft. ppm e
1 Begin End : 5aplel 6" of 1 eFt. Ft. !Collect: Drive 1 t Visual Classification
____ ___ ____ ____ 23 / .4
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 24 " .I I a a I I I / i
DI-6I 25: 271 SS1 41 1.5. : 0: 25 Sate as above.
___ __ __ __ __ ___ __ __ __ __ __ 26 /I /l / /Z
8i: i 26a
27 /',
a a a a a a a a 28 .
a a a : a a 29
DWI-71 301 32: SSI 4. 1.5: 0 30 ", Same as above.l ~ 1 7,
i 14: : : 31I ~~~~141 II I I,' J/
_____________32_./"/'_. Drillers believe they hit-" 'sand and gravel' layers
a .. a . a : 33 , between 32' and 35'
a a a a a a a I a a 34
DWI-8: 35: 37: SS: 5: 1.60 : a 0: 35 Same as above; trace of9: a a a a lignite fragments.14a a a a a 3616a a a a a
a a a a a 37
S ! : a a a a
to a. aorl aote asaaanda 3i 1 41 len fro 0. --0,.9.,
a a a a a 39 - . ! _ -
17 Z I I.. 'DW1-9t 40: 42: 55: 5, 1.4: : : 0: 40 Same as above with a med.Lo8: g a a . to crs,, poorly sorted sand
a 13ia: 41 .o .. ,| lens from 0.8 -0.9.
17: : : a a 2 ," ',.
ai-~ a5 a7 aS al a.8 a. a a al 4 -" - S n a o e
, a
aoa aoatanaea an aex ag3
a a a a a a I
D.1-16
PROJECT NAME: USAF-HAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/7-9/86 BORING NUMBER: D1(see note on D. 1-18)
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1632.21 ft asiON SITE 6EOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Tvin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hud Rotory YELL(S) INSTALLED: DiY-I, SI-2
SamIleSaple Sample: Method! Blows : Recov. : O.V.A.: FNumber, Depth Depth 1 of 1 per Ft. ppm 1 e
Begin End 1 Sample: ' of :eFt. 1 Ft. :Collect! Drive 1 t Visual Classification
14 1 ib 46
o 0 : : 50 S'v 5a : 9 : :."/ t
5 a * * 47 ,., ,
Dil-l 50 52 aS 9I l.a a 5a ar. amas bvet 5 .
.1: 271, 1 .1 1/1 change to silty fine sand,: :28: i 5 1 ,./- slightly moist to moist.: : : ~241 ://",
I l l l l 52 " -
__ __ __-__ 853 , / ,1
l : I I 54 z '
a a a a a a a a a a 49 ."....,.
DI-12i: 55: 57: SSI 8i 1.5: O: 55 ,' Dark gray silty clay ith
13: trace of sand and pebbles;23,: 55 h alternating fine sand and
25: i i i ., clay from 0.5 -1.5.l I l 57 ""
,. IZ
I .
a a a a 2 : a a 51 . ..
DI-13: 601' 62: SS: 6: IX4 OI 0! 0 / // Dark gray silty clay ith9: // trace of lignite.
131 I 61 . . .1 21 /Z.a
l l 62 / i
32,'~~ i 6sad
a a 53 . ,
a a 54 . .a a a.a.a.
oi-14: 55: 57: SS: 8: 2.0: : : : O: 55 ,"", Dark gray silty clay wth 5'a a 139 : a a ...., trcnes oan oande pees
S a a a 30 : I"a/56: : : 67 " / 1
L aoata u : N .ag a
aaaa a a aIaaI
D.1 -17
PROJECT NAME: USAF-KAFD PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 1017-8186 BORING NUMBER: DWI(see note on D. 1-18)
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1632.21 ft slON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Mud Rotory WELL(S) INSTALLED: Di-i, SW-2
SampleiSample Sample: Method: Blows Recov.1 : O.V.A,1 FNumber: Depth: Depth : of ' per Ft. a I ppe e
:Begin End 1 Sample! 6' of a eFt. Ft. !Collect! Drive a a a t Visual Classificationa a a a a 68
aa a a a aa 69
DWI-151 701 721 SS: 121 0.81 0 a 70 Dark gray silty clay
a a a a 17: a a a a changes to fine sanda a 231 a a a a 71 (saturated).
a a a a 25 1 a a a aa a a a a a aa 72
a a a a a a aa 73
S a a a a a a a a 74
DWI-16: 75: 77: SS: 7: 1.0: 0: 75 Dark gray silty clay;a aa 11 a a a a very dense.a a 151 a a a 76a a a a 2 1 1 a a a aa a a a a a a 77
: : f : : I 79
DWa-17: 80: 82: SS: 51 0.51 i i Oi 80 Same as above.
: i 151 81
: : : : : : 82
: : : : 83
: : : : 84
DWI-i 851 871 SSi 61 1.7: 0 as Same as above.
: : : : ~101 :, "
Log Continued on Next Page
D.1-18
PROJECT InE: USAF-NIPI PROJECT NUNDER: 01071-0001TE DRILLED: 10/7-6/86 8OI3 UD(ER: DVl*
DRILLING LOCATIOI : Landfill iORiOLe GRID ILIV.: 1632.21ON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillez/ J. Vol DRILLING CONPHT: Win City Testing
DRILLING NEIHOD: Nod Rotory VILL(S) INSTALLED: DWI, S12
SamplelSample I Samplel Methodl Blows I ecov.l I I I O.1.1.1 Iluberl Depth lDepthl of I Per I Ft.I I I I pp.l e
I Begin I End I Saplel 6' of I I I I I I eI ft. I Ft. ICollectl Drive I I I I I I t Visual Classification
I I I I I,' (ICLII I I I I88
I l l I I I I 1 89 ,,/I I I I IIII I
DVi-111 901 521 SSI 6I 0.61 1 1 1 01 90 ,7, Same as above.I I I SI I II1 . -,
, , I 1 I I911 I 321 I 1 1 1 1
! I 92 /"I I I I I I I I /'
S I I 93 ,<.
I I I I I I I I 1 94I I I
DV1-201 951 971 SSl 371 1.21 1 1 01 95 /1 Silty fine sand to sandyI I I I 541 silt.
I 461 1 1 96 1/I I I I I I I ."I I
I I I I I I I 1 97
* A monitoring well was not installed in this100 Ft. boring; a new boring for well installationwas drilled a short distance (less than 5 Ft) fromthis boring to the appropriate depth for wellinstallation.
D.-19
DATE DRiLLED: 10/9-ii!26 NR UB DDNILLING LOCATIGN -ndfii: BONEHOLE GfND EV. -'E4 C 4
.N .. 'A ' ..... ... t -e~ :
Am~er" Deptn 23ePtn er .
t Ft. Co1 iect Dr,.ve~ a 5 xas;ct
.* .... .. ................ Yr~ ~,c~yt:~
-.langes to gray slity clay W/
ae:sanC anc et i es.71
... ....... ..- .... ... .. . ....
........-. ..
... .. ... .... -CJ.. gray s-ty c-ay W:tm
I orange and Ojack motthng;..... I .. ... ~ :t. -o~wn, silty
-i 2 ii ;ra.:e of sanc... ............... .. . ars p e O e s.
as~:7i gr aveL,
o. ... ... .. I
-~~ -~ ~ . ark a-:ve ., ::,cr4
a E ae; 7 .. E ES
D.1-20
PROJECT NAME- USAF-MAFB ?--KjE"' NUMBER: Vi:7-uDATE DRILLED: 10Ii-4i86 BRNu 'uMBER: OK"
DRILLINE LA2N:Landfil BC'D-E r 0L E 13R ND EEV :4. m.~ON SITE GEOLOGIST :V. DeVillez/ Vc. DPILL:N 11 A:Tin>yTs
DR7LLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WE;!(S).' :NSTALEO: SW-1
;Nuaber! Depth Depth of :per In. 2Begin iEnd Sample 6 of e
.t .t ........ . .
.~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ .. .... ... ...... ... ... . ........
F . . .... ..... .. ... ............ . .. ..- ......... . ..... ..... ...
.... .. .... .... ... ...... ..
-.- . ..- ~ ~ ~ . ... . . . . . . - . ... .....- --. ..
S~l-E ~ . I Wet sandy silt to 0.2;U . - . Cary. gray'
...... .... ..... . ... ......... .. y l y
.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -... .. ..... . ... .... .... .....
SW'-9 40: 2,s 7: "L~ U.o: , silty sand;- 12I ii-~* ' 6ark gray, C-Ity
S-. 4-ay; tnE nEa' Of the
~~~~~. . . . . . . . . . ..... .. ... .. . . . . .... ...- ..
D.1-21
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/14/86 BORING NUMBER: DN3
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1648.57 ft. eslON SITE GEOLOGIST : DeVillez/ Macke/ Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Holow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: OW-3
SamplelSample : Sample: Method! Blows Recov.: O.V.'' r
Number: Depth Depth of per Ft. : ppm e: Begin :End Sample: 6' of : e
Ft. Ft. :Collect! Drive 1 : :t Visual Classification
DW3-1: 0: 2: SS! 2, 1: 0.9; : 0: I[ML 0 -0.1: dk. brn peat;___________3: __ 1 0.1 -0.9: dk. brown clayey
3: : si!t wl some organic debris.
S___ 2
a i I I
Da3-2: 5: 7: SS: 2; 1.1! i 0: 5 Park gray and brown mottled4: silty clay; a silty sand
i i : : 4: 6 lens at 0.6; trace of: : : : 6: pebbles throughout.
DW3-3: I0: 12: SS: 3: 1.9: i 0: i5 Lt to dk. brown and gray6: mottled silty clay with71a i i traces of sand and pebbles.
: 12:I LI aa12
: 14
DW3-4a 15; 17: SS: 5 1.6: 0: 15 Same as above.
: i : II i16a4 i a:
', : :17
: :: 19
D3-5 a 201 251 SS 3a 1.71 0 a : 20 Same as above.
: i 9 : 21
: i : 13 :: : : :22
Log Continued on Next Page
a a a l a a a |
D. 1-22
PROJECT NAME: USAF-HAFD PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/14/86 BORING NUMBER: DW3
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1648.57 ft. aslON SITE GEOLOGIST : DeVillez/ Macke/ Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Holow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: DW-3
Sasple:Saiple Sample: Method: Blows Recov.1 O..A. FNumber Depth Depth 1 of ! per Ft. 1 ppm 1 e
fBegin End : Sample! 6' of eFt. Ft. !Collect! Drive * t Visual Classification
i 24
DN3-6: 25,' 271 Ssi 6,' 2.01 O101 25 I'.,.CL] Dark gray silty clay with
9! .. . some patchy brown areas and
: 17: i i 9 / ,- .1 27 .. ..
0W3-7* 30; 32: SS: 51 1.3i 3 0 30 . "Dark gray silty clay with
...... trace of sand and pebbles.
3 I3 I 3 , ...
: : i 0: J 31 ...'...
: : ~14: i ..."3 3 32
3 3 33
i 34:
3I 3 3 3 3 3 .... ,
I I I 3 I I ... . ,
DW3-8: 35: 37: SS 6: .0 0: 25 ... IX arSame as above.
* ...-. . "
9: : some.patch..bro.n.area...n__ _ _ 14: i _ _ 26 ta ofa anpbe
37 ... ..: 4 : : . .....
3 II I I a 38 ....
39 ..i 13: 41 " " ....
DW3-7: 30: 32: SS: 5; 1.5: :0O 30 Darkgra.sity laywit
3 3 13: * 3trae o.snd.nd ebbe.
17: : 31
I : : :~ 42 ' '...
14: 43
1 44
* I 3 I ... • "..
DW3,IO; 451 471 SS .0__1L. .... .......L: O 45 .. . ...,. Same as above.
Log Continued an Next Page
3 l l I 3 3 I
D. 1-23
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/14/86 BORING NUMBER: DW3
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1648.57 ft. aslON SITE GEOLOGIST : DeVillez/ Macke/ Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Holow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: DW-3
Sample:Sample Sample: Method! Blows : Recov.: i i O.V.A.4 FNumber: Depth: Depth : of : per 1 Ft. ppe e
Begin End : Sample: 6' of :e eFt. Ft. :Collect! Drive : : : : t Visual Classification
121 : : 46
14: : : 47i 47
D.1-24
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/17-21/86 BORING NUMBER: DM4 (see note on D. 1-28)
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEV.: 1633.50 ft. slON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. Devillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: DW-4, SW-4
Sample;Sample 1 Sample, Method! Blows Recoy.: a O.V.A.: FNumber' Depth Depth of : per Ft. i ppm e
Begin End Sample: 6' of eFt. Ft. :Collect! Drive 1 t Visual Classification
DO4-1: 0 2: SS: 6, 6: 0.8: : O (ML] Dk brown to blk topsoil;a I : 6:: 1 sandy silt with trace of
i 7: pebbles.DW4-2: 2: 4: SS: 2: 1.4 0: 2 0 -0.8: dk. brn. sandy silt;
S2: 0.8 -1.4: dk. brown silty
S5: 3 sand and gravel.: : : : 7:
DW4-3: 4: 6: SS: 6: 2.0: : : : o: 4 0 -0.2: dk. brn. sandy silt;
8: I I I 0.2 -2.0: It. brown, mediumI : : : 1i1: : : _ : _ 5 sand with some pebbles.
DW3-4: 6: 8: SS: 9: 1.7 : : o: 6 0 -1.0: same as above;
i 14: i I 1.0 -1.7: It. gray, fine to15: : : : : : 7 medium sand with some pebblesto : and silt.
DW4-5 8: 10: SS: 5: 0.6: : 01 8 Lt. brown medium sand withi 5: some silt and pebbles; plug
I 71 i a 9 in head of spoon was brown* . I clay.
DM4-6: 10: 12 SS: I: o: : : 0: 10 No recovery.
* * : * 4: ::.1
DM4-7: 12: 14: SS: 2: 1.7: : : 0: 12 Brown and gray mottled silty3: : : : : : clay with trace of sand,
______ 5: : : : : 13 pebbles and lignite.
DW4-8: 14 16: SS: 21 L.: : : 0 14 0 -0.4: brown silty clay witha a a Al I a a a :trace of sand and pebbles.
: j: 6: : : : : 15 . CL] 0.4 -1.8: Dk. gray silty claya 8: *; w/ trace of sand and pebbles.
0W4-9 : !8! SS: 3: 2.0: : : o: 16 Dark gray silty clay with: a a I a trace of sand and gravel.
S a a a 8: aa 17a I I i0a a
DW4-lO: 18: 20 SS: 3: 0.2: : O: 18 Same as above.
S a a 7: : : 19
a a aa20
a a a21
Log Continued on Next Page
nI a m m n m inue a mm m aE m nana
D. 1-25
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/17-21/86 BORING NUMBER: DN4 (see note on D. 1-28)
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1633.50 ft. islON SITE 6EOLO6IST : V. Devillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: DW-4, SW-4
Sample:Sample : Sample: Method: Blows : Recov. O.V.A.: FNumber; Depth 1 Depth of : per Ft. ppm e
:Begin :End :Sample: 6" of eFt. Ft. Collect: Drive i I t Visual Classification
DW4-11: 23: 251 SS" 31 2.0 : 0: 23 Same as above.
I I I I 5 I .... ....
I I ".//
:6: i: 2471 i I 2 "
QW-2 291 30 S..." 4..... 1-:o.2aeasaoe
I I 1 .... .I..31
I I I I I I." .."" ..
I I 32 .
DW4-13: 33 35 s 3 1.5 0: 8 Same as above. w a
: : : 5 ... -.. silty, gray sand lens from7 34 .0.9 -.0; also, tip of
: i i 9: i .-o.. spoon and some sand.
4: , : *,*I I t I I I 5 " ....... .....
a:: : : : 30 .
i i i 36 . .
DW4-141 381 40: SS: 121 1.9: o: 38 0 -0.4: fine to medium, gray: ] 15: silty sand with some pebbles;
S 16: J 39 Z, 0.4 -1.9: fine, gray, silty
: 21: sand.: : : 40
: 41
: : : : 42
DW4-15: 43: 45: SS: 7: 1.51 o: 43 0 -0.3: medium, gray, silty
: ; : to : sand with some pebbles.: : : It :: 44 0.3 -1.5: dk. gray, silty
i 17: clay with some pebbles.: l : : : 45 2 very small sand tenses
Log Continued on Next Page
* I I
. . .. ...... ... . . . . . I I m Iu I
D.1-26
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFD PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/17-21/86 BORING NUMBER: DW4 (see note on D. 1-28)
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1633.50 ft. isiON SITE SEOLOGIST : V. Devillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: DW-4, SW-4
Sample:Sample Sample: Method: Blows 1 Recov. O.V.A.: FNumberf Depth Depth 1 of : per Ft. 1 ppm : e
:Begin End ! Sample: 6' of eFt. Ft. :Collect: Drive : t Visual Classification
(<.05') at l and 1.4.a aa ii 46I
: : : : : : 47
DW4-16.' 481 so: SS: 7! 1.7: 0 : 48 Dark gray silty clay withit: trace of sand and pebbles and
S; 13; 49 small sand lenses it ISa 18: and 1.4.
i :i 52
DW4-17; 531 55,' SS" 141 2.0; i 53 Fine to med, gray sand,
: 29: fairly well sorted t rounded,: : 35: : 54 and some silt; lens of dark
: : 50. 1: gray, sandy silt with some! :: 55 pebbles at 1.7 -1.8.
: : :: : : 56
: : :: : : 57
0W4-18: 58: 60: SS: 20: IX4 0iO 58 Same as above.
ii 301 i ii 40: i i 59
*~~ ~ 6 I06
a I I I 6 I62
DW4-191 63: 65: SS: 20: 1.5: :0: 3 Lens of pebbles from 0 -0.2;
: i : 22: 0.2 -1.5; same sand as above.37: 64
Sr o a a pbn43:d
: __ __ __ * 13 : : : G9smlsnlesst
* I I::: : : : and .4
I I I I I I7
Log Continued on Next Page
a 6 a a i a
D.1-27
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/17-21/86 BORING NUMBER: DN4(see note on D. 1-28)
DRILLINS LOCATION : Landfii] BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: 1633.50 ft. as]ON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. Devillez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: DW-4, S-4
Saeple:Sample ; Sample! Method: Blows 1 Recov. : O.V.A, FNumber: Depth 1 Depth: of : per Ft. ppm e
: Begin : End :Sample: 6' of : e: Ft. : Ft. :Collect: Drive : t Visual Classification
DW4-201 Sal 70: SS: 251 1.: 10 0: 68 0 -0.8: saze sand as above;33: : : :. 0.8 -1.O: dark gray, silty21: 69 clay with trace of sand33, and pebbles.
I * * I I ____ _ .70I I I I I . .- .
i 72 ... .- .
DW4-211 73: 751 SS: 251 1.7: 0;O 73 ..."-/ 0 -1 1: fn,-med, silty sand;29; i 1.1 ,. ~ -1.3: sed-crs sand;241 i i 74 / 1.3 -1.7: alternating silty26: i ,., clay and fine sand with
i75 trace of pebbles.
: : ~ ~i 76 ... ...
i 77
0W4-22: 781 80.1 SS" 251 1., i 0: 78 z" .. . Fine silty sand.
: : i 35 i. , ..i 42 : 79 ... ,.- ..
i 55i g i iI I I I 80I.... "
I I I I I I... ..
i 82 .....
D04-231: 3: 75: SS: 22: 1.7: : : 8 73 . ery fine silty sand
: : ~~~31: :...../i 0 : i . ..
____ ____ ____ ___ ____ _ __ ____ ___ ____ ____ __... 7 '....
I I I I . .. .
i 8 7
Log Continued on Next Page
I I I i 42: I II: 7
D. 1-28
PROJECT NME: USAF-NAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE KILLED: 10117-21/86 BORING NUMBER: DiW4*
DRILLING LOCATION : Landfill BOREHOLE 6RND ELEY.: 1633.50 ft. asON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeillezI J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Tvin City Testing
DRILLING ETHOD: Hollov Flight Auger NELL(S) INSTALLED: D1-4, SI-4
SaspleISasple Samplel Method! Blovs 1 Recov. : : 1 O.V.A.: FNumber: Depth Depth : of 1 per Ft. ppm e
Begin1 End 1 Sample! 6' of e1Ft. I Ft. Collect: Drivet Visual Classification
(CLID04-24: Be: 901 SS: 24: 1.3: O 88 0 -0.4: fine sand;
i lo: 0.4 -1.3: dark gray, silty271 I I 89 clay vith trace of pebbles.
1 : : 42:: 1 90I I i .. I I I I I Il I 9 0
l l ' ,l l91
a a I I i'i I I I 9 2
D__-25: 93: ,9,§1 SS. 501 0.6-1 _ _11 93 Fine sand vith a lens of
1 100/414' coarse sand.
I l ' lI i I I I I i i. I ' 9
i I : : , t , 95
* I a a a
*II a a a a I
D4-26: 98 1001 SS:1 171 0n 1 1 0 1 98 Lenses of fine, gr4y sand and1 10 271 : 1 dark gray silty clay.
11: 35,1 Is 1 . .. 99
: ] : : It 100
*A monitoring well was not installed in this100 Ft boring; a new boring for well installation
was drilled a short distance (less than 5 Ft) from
this boring to the appropriate depth for wellinstallation.
a a a I i I S I I
D.1 -29
PROJECT NAME: USAF-MAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/22/86 BORING NUMBER: TBI
DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: Not SurveyedON SITE GEOLOGIST : V. DeVillezl J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: None
Sample:Sample Sample! Method! Blows Recov, O.V.A. FNumberl Depth Depth 1 of : per 1 Ft. : a ppm 1 e
: Begin :End : Sample: 6' of : eFt. Ft. :Collect: Drive i I i t Visual Classification
TBI-1: 0: 2: SSI 3, 5: 0: 0 201 (ML] No sample recovery; gravel_ _ _ _ _3_ _ _ _ _ _ _ and silty/sandy fill;
3: Isoil is visibly contaminated_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _2 and has a strong odor.
TBI-21 5: 71 55: l 1.31 1 10-201 5 fireenish-gray clayey silt.
i : : 7
T81-3: to: 12: SS., 2: 1.5: 300: 10 Lt. brown clayey silt; someS 4: black staining strong odor.
S 6:
: : :12
: : : :13
: : : :14
TBI-4: 15: 17: S5: 21 1.81 i 6001, 15 grownish-green clayey silt;: 31 strong odor.
8 : i 16
i 17
i 19 1 l
TBI-5: 20: 22; SS: 4: 1,8: i 3: 20 Lt. brown clayey silt;i 9: slight odor.
: : 91 21
Log Continued on Next Page
a a a | a I
D.1-30
PROJECT NAME: USAF-NAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/22/86 BORING NUMBER: TBI
DRILLING LOCATION : F.T.A. BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: Not SurveyedON SITE GEOLO6IST : V. DeViIlez/ J. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: None
Sample:Sample Sample! Method: Blows Recov. O.V.A. FNumber! Depth: Depth : of : per: Ft. ppm e
:Begin: End 1 Sample! 6' of ::eFt. Ft. fCollect: Drive i t Visual Classification
i i 23
* a 24
TBI-6: 25: 27 Ss: 6: 1.7: i : 0: 25 [CL] Dark gray silty clay with9: : trace of pebbles; sand
i : a: : 26 lens at 0.3.a a a 11 : :
S a a a a a a27
TBI-7: 28: 30 SS: 6: 1.6: : 28 Same as above, no sand.a a : :
1 a a 9i 29
3 a a P::a
a a a a a aai3
.1-31
PROJECT NME: ISAF-NAFB PROJECT NUMBER: 01071-00DATE DRILLED: 10/24186 BORING NUMBER: TB2
DRILLING LOCATION E.O.D. BOREHOLE GRND ELEV.: Not SurveyedON SITE GEOLOGIST :V. DeVillez, .!. Volz DRILLING COMPANY: Twin City Testing
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Flight Auger WELL(S) INSTALLED: None
fample:Sample Sample; Method: Blows Recov.; O,V.A.J FNumber: Depth Depth of :per Ft. p. e
Begin End Sample! 6" of eFt. Ft. :Collect: Drive t ViSLal Classification
T82-1; 0; 2: SS: 2, 2: 0.5, 0; I ML Dark brown silty topsoil.
KB-2 L ; 7... .... 3. ... 2.0............... 5 Lt. brown silty clay with
41 white and orange mottling.
TB2- 10 12 55; ; 20; ~i1 Saue as above.
12
14
TB2-; i; 1715s Same as above.
61
I I I EI I 17
T.- 8 .0 ...... 4 . ..... .. .... ......... ......... 18 Same as above.7 :II
..... . ..... .. ... ........ q ....0 ... ........ ... ... ...; .... ;.. .;.. .. 1...9
I I i ; ; ;; 20.I.. . . . ..... ... ...I ..... ..I.. . - ... ... .... ....... ..... .. .I. . .......I ...
APPENDIX D.2
BORING LOGS FOR USGS TESTBORINGS COMPLETED IN THE VICINITY OF MAFB
(CL506OB/0528N)
D. 2-1
c6
za
0IC)L
<Cl
[ I zI 0 (3
coc
LI---
[LL V)j< __ I
Z Ir
-c-oCdN
D.2-2
Renvitle County TEST HOLELOCATION: 158-83-35.d U.S. Geol. Survey DATE DRILLED: 1947
ELEVAtION; 1,610 feet DEPTH: 165 feetabove sea level
0
04 a.
wZ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION w 0
0 O-1 soil. 0
1-7 Sand, fine, and gravel withacne yeLuov clay. *00
.
25. 7-56 Clow, sandy, gray, with aome 0
gravel. 0
0
.0'00.
* 0100
50 ,,
%58 Gravel.*00
, 0
0 a
0.
00
$4 0a
ci8
: ij 1971 UISGS TEST BORING A
~SOURCE:
FePettyjohn and Hutchinson, 1971
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.
C 0 ! I
D.2-3
Ward County TEST HOLE 2366
LOCATION: 157-83-8ccc DATE DRILLED: July 15, 1965
CLEVATION- 1,710 feet DEPTH: 210 feetabove sea level
0 MATERIAL OESCRIPTION c 0
0 9 0-27 Till, silty and sandy,yellow-brown.
.0*00-"6
2527-UT Till, silty and sandy, ;°p-oo
olive-gpay; few thinLayers of sand and "<pgr l. *0
50,
*0
4o
117-124 Sand, fine to medium.
124-194 Til, sily and sandy, olive-
125- gray; few thin layers of"-sand and gravel.
000
150-
04 000-
S175 n
.0 0
194-196 Lignite, blac.196-210 Clay, sandy, olive-gray.
*0
00
-25-
2751971 USGS TEST BORING BSOURCE:
L1300LJPettyjohn and Hutchinson, 1971
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.
• • ii ii0I
D.2-4
Ward County TEST HOLELOCATION1 157-83-9ccc U.S. Ge.ol. Survey-'/ DATE DRILLED-. j U,
ELEVATION: 1,687 feet DEPTH: 210 feet
above so- levelo 20-x
m.a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ,"0 -1 soil. 0o
0?boo0
1-4 Clay, yellow, with sce graveland fine sand.
25. 4-10 Clay, yellow, with some gravel.
10-13 Clay, sandy, yellow, with stripsof fine sand. 0.01
13-17 Sand, fine.
17-28 Clay, sandy, gray. 000,00
28-34 Clay, sandy, gray, with strips 00 0
of fine sand. 0 o
- .r 34-4o sand, fine.-oO ,4U 40-54 Clay, sandy, gray, with thin4 4 strips of gravel and fine sand. .o.
54-58 Clay, sandy, gray, with some 0 0
100- gravel. Jo 0 6
58-60 Sand, fine and gravel.oO O
60-63 Clay, sandy, gray, with thin oo !strips of gravel. .00
125" 63-81 Clay, sandy, gray, with sme oO
gravel and some thin strips oof gravel.
81-82 Gravel and fine sand.
82-84 Clay, sandy, gray, with thinstrips of gravel. a:C %,
<3 €0
o84-85 Gravel and fine sand. 0%'
85-91 Clay, sandy, gray, with thin"75 strips of gravel.
-o0
91-94 Sand, fine, and gravel with -
s me lignite fragents. 0.'00
200 94-121 Clay, sandy, gray, with thin °0strips of gravel and lignitefragnents.
a 121-162 Clay, sandy, gray, with gravel0 and fine sand and thin strips2 of gravel.4
162-163 Boulders.163-178 Clay, sandy, gray, with thin
strips of gravel and fine sand.
250- 178-190 Clay, sandy, gray, with some
gravel.
190-1096 Clay, sandy, gray, with stripsof fine sand and gravel. 1971 USGS TEST BORING C
275 196-210 Sand, capact, gray.
SOURCE:Pettyjohn and Hutchinson, 1971
300" / Froo LaRocque and others, 1963.
181FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.
D.2-5
Ward County TEST HOLE
,OCATION: 157-83-3Obbb U.S. Geol. Surveyl- DATE. DRILLED: July 31, 19.7ELEVATION: 1,760 feet DEPTH: 245 feet
above sea levelU
oo~J 4-a.
WZ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION c
o 0-3 Soil.
3-12 Clay, yellow.
12-46 Clay, gray, with some gravel.
25 00
46-56 Clay, sandy, gray, with somestrips of fine sand and gravel.
56-60 Sand and gravel.
60-64, Clay, sandy, gray. =
7 64-87 Sand, fine, and gravel.75-
87-220 Clay, sandy, gray, with sne .
gravel and lignite fragnents.
oo000'0.
5 0
oOO
oOo0
0"00oo
525 00
-. 1 .4e
oo0
42 oo4
420 06
20 000
m 215"- -- oo
-2000
z O4
... , •50000
oeO
of
-225° 0000
000
00
275- 197 USG TETBRN
FRE C.HRTASCITSIC
o 575 00
o#Oo?0
2' 0004
0'04
00 O
I.
0
.,
275 1971 USGS TEST BORING DSOURCE:Pettyjohn and Hutchinson. 1971
l0o _ 1_/ Frre LeRocque and others, 1963.
__________________________________________ FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES. INC.
D.2-6
Ward County TEST HOLE II' "I
LOCATION' 157-8-33-' c DATE DRILLED: ,wptemIber 22,
ELEVATION; 1,645 feet DEPTH: 1 99.) fretabove sea lev.'
0o-jI-&a, z MATERIAL DESCRIPTION M 00-:) 0 j
0 0-28 Till, yellov-gray, andfine to coarse gravel. 00
m 00
• 0
28-59 Till, gray, and fine tomedium gravel.
a040 .
006
so, p5! .60a
59-61 Gravel, fine. 00-0
S 61-190 Till, gray, and fine tomedlum gravel.
.75. - o
0.
()0 0
.00 Ooco
@ o
.-25 -
ao
00
of0*06
1-4 . 000o
15 -
N 0~0!
199.5 Clay, sad, 0ray.0-
-200 o
-2250
250-
-25.1971 USGS TEST BORING E
SOURCE:
' Pettyjohn and Hutchinson, 1971
4- WFRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.
,.0 . I I oI
D.2-7
Wnrd County TEST HOLE 324,IL
LOCATION: 157-82-11bhhb 0ATL DRILLED: July 29, 1%
ELEVATION: 1,602 feet DEPTH: 200 feetabove sea level
u2
0 x
LaZ MATERIAL DESCRIPTION POTENTIAL(MV) c o RESISTANCE (OHMS)
0 0-20 Till, silty and sandy,yellow-brown; few
-pebbles.
20-55 Till, silty d sandy,-25. olive-gray; few thin layers
of gravel.
.50.
4 55-75 Sand, medium to coarse,and fine gravel.
7 75-151 Till, silty and sandy,olive-gray; few boulders
o and thin layers of sandand gravel.
100
HI'IO __ 151-200 Shale, silty and sandy,
0 olive -gray.
00
-175-'
0~
.200 -
Observation well, depth 71 feet.
225
250-
-ZT5. 1971 USGS TEST BORING FSOURCE:
S 15 0Pettyjohn and Hutchinson, 1971
0FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES INC.
-- 0 ,
D.2-8
Ward County TEST HOLE
,OCATION: 157-82-28ddd U.S. Geol. Survej DATE DRILLED: August 1, 1947
CLEVATION: 1,619 feet DEPTH: 210 feetabove sea level
o 0.
0; MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0
o-2 Soil. 0
2-17 Clay, yellow, with some gravel. --
17-23 Clay, sandy, brown, with 00ame gravel. G0
25.023-28 Clay, sandy, gray, with Sam
gravel. 0.
28-31 Gravel.
50, 31-35 Clay, sandy, gray, with stripsof gravel. :-f
4 35-40 Gravel. .011
0-46 Clay, sandy, gray, with god75. strips of gravel. '.
6-47 Gravel.
7-83 Clay, sandy, gray, with sme 4
gravel. - -*too OGG
83-91 Clay, sandy, gry, with t a?..strips of gravel and lignite 00fragments.o
91-94 Gravel, with strips of gray " -*04125- sandy clay and lignite
fragments. •0
94-00 Clay, sandy, gray, gravel, oolwith thin strips of lignite .__fragments.
150- - - _--o 100-119 Clay, sandy, gray, with gravel
and fine sand and thin stripsc of lignite fragments.0
119-130 Clay, sandy, gray, with thinITS- strips of fine sand, gravel,
and lignite fragments. --
130-132 Clay, sandy, gray, with sme -
gravel and boulders. --
2 132-142 Clay, sandy, gray. -
142-144 Gravel, with strips of gray -_:-sandy clay.
1 -197 Clay, sandy, gray..25
197-201 Shale.
201-210 Clay, sandy, gray.
250
1971 USGS TEST BORING G275.
SOURCE:Pettyjohn and Hutchinson, 1971
"300 I/ From LaRocque and others, 1963.
FRED C. HART ASSOCIATES, INC.
APPENDIX E
FIELD RAW DATA
(CL5O6OB/0528N)
01 A_ _ IN L I I IL.1" V%
E- 1
J03 INFORMATI-9JN:
Project 4:___________ L -3c V Io n: A4-g e/,A7
:lient: Li,1fq: Dates of Report: o -,.p3F'Itel Team Leader: __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
DAILY FIELD ACTIVETIES
1. Date:/6.6
HART Personnel On-site: ~C~,nkzJ/L ~-
Suocoritractors On-s i~e: WA4~M. ~p
-/Y"a 76C.469iclleWork Accomplisned: Al
Problems Encountered:___________________________
2. Date: ,0 2.4? esnn,? On si-e: ____________________________
Subcontractors Jn-site: ___1_________________________
?roolens Encountered: __________________________
E-2
3. Date: /1 9.8AHA RT Personnel Oni-sit:_________________________
Subcontractors ~ ~ /Y Lnst::/ 1,k~
Problems Encountered: 7b/i$.~-J
HART Pers&onnel On-site:/D s
Subconltraictors On-site:
W4ork Accomnplishe~d: r,:k/5C4~ L2_a}/. AAA
)[)I~ernS Encuntere~i: ___________________ __________
E-3J03 INFORMATIOri:
Project 4: i,,?-1a -- Lacaion: / __, __,___n,_,_
1iient: /.il. oates of Reourt: ,11-10./3.e6Fieli Team Leader: __-
DAILY FIELD ACTIVITIES
1. Date: /6.//. Z
HART Personnel On-site: ,j-
Suor.on tractors On-site: 1,G/W/: A/.r A/.7:.
Work Accomplisted: Ai ,/-PiA-/ 1 S- -
Problems Encountered: do,/k -"
2. Date: /p-/3-'' A T Personnpe, On-si!e: &_71
Subcontractors On-site: w I 4'j 4 A. 7
?r 0 r ems Encou n ter ed: dozdwqc6!t 16, g z
-l26 'e11J Z-
JO1 I :. "-~:*1 E-4
~~ojec: ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1-ca-ion: rAP, '7~ 0 .At
I_____ Dates of Rep~ort: /~/ ?A a'-y~ a '~ e d e 2 V 4jv / &
DAILY F:--'- ACTDh1TIES
2. Dato? /(7 _ _ __ _ __
Sut,-,Nntract )rs On-site:
~~d'W4 7;CC.,,p 4 c e: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
3. D at -: E--/5-E5
HA'R T aersonne I 'in-1 - TT~ 3 i :e
Problems Encountered:
4. Date: /0-14 -7
HART Personnel On-site: , K, ( ,'
Problems Encountered:
(r/
D % _s_,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __,-w_ _ _
W.-LKLY K:LU LUG
E-6
JU3 IFORMATION:
Project 4: N6100.a "J'.cvion: TVJJ71f
lient: _______________ Dates of Report:
FHela Team Leader: /{$/e Z
DAILY FIELD ACTIVITIES
1. Date: /,6'2O80HART Personnel On-site: kYJT.O1.TV
Subcontractors On-site: 7w'/Al Ct A 17A.7
Work Accomplisied: 0_wZW~ Z~'-~o4'pwg
Problems Encountered: ~-~ k
2. Date: 1, 92/g 4?Mf erso)nnz On-siwe: ____________________________
Subcontractors On-s ite: : #.i ),7 '
?r')rtIerrs Enco~un tered:
E -7
HkRT 3ersonnel 3n-si*.e: fI QJV
WorK Accompflsned: A/
.&Ion t kV 04 AjiVA~Problems Encountered: Wp 1a L ir-w~ -~tV7 .i-i
4. Date: Id .Zi.
HART Personnel On-site: J V
Sutc.-ntractors On-s--e: 7i&) 1T M .
Work Accomplished: AQ-~ AVf7 S f 't> M /n$'~O
Probl1ems Encountered: ~~~am/
---- --- --- ---- --- --- --- ---- --- --- ---- --- --- --- ---- --- --- ---
/,
H.wo r o; j ie d:m ~ ________________________________
rWtLY :i U LUG£
E-8
J03 INF)R"AT I.JI:
P'oject #: 01671-,96-W6b -oD Lca on: A'Af ?A0',A7.,-
I ient: _ _ __ Dates of Repjrt: /O.2S-/A' /.2j'Fie1 Team Leader: .
DAILY FIELD ACTIVITIES
1. Date: /07jr"- ____
HART Personnel On-site: k .D jV
Suoconitractors On-site: JIAi{,t.7
Work Accomplished: -/ d e L2, 76-x- ,.L;.&/
Problems Encountered:
2. Date: __ ____'I /
Suocontractors On-site: WIA' 76 , el-
A:)r - c c-O, ',n i ;;1e 1:
-on,;ern:J Encjuntered:
3. Date: -' .gE-HARI' :ersonnel Jn-si:e: _________________________
Work AccompIi sled: .4 '
Problems Encountered: __________________________
4. Date: /0_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _
HART Personnel On-site: _________________________
Subcontractors On-site: _________________________
Work Accorp Ii §hect:
Problems Encountered:____________________________
WorK Acconp 1i S :ed: "i7Z /A) 1W7 A L1A.ZA
ProoDiems Enc.ountere-I: ___________ ___________
E-1OJ03 PIF]RMATOl:
Project Z _ __ _ __ __ _ _ oca.'on: _______________A1
" __________________________Dates of Reort: 1d2/-.* ,6
~It j Team Leader: ___________
DAILY FIELD ACTIVITIES
1. Date: 10/
HART Personnel On-site: __._ __ _ _ _/_
Suocontractors On-si te:
Work AccomplIi sned: i77ze~ ACoW_ &4
Problems Encountered: t 1i
2. Date: //"1"4
Subcontractors On-site:
A,r n) i -3,u e ed
D-_o;,2rs Enicountered: ___________________________
.3. 'Date: 11-7,149 E-11
HAR7F Dersornn& Jn-sice: vi
WorK Accomp1i sned: ~ St~.'.L ~ 4 J r L
Problems Encountered: ___________________________
4. Date: ____________
HART Personnel On-sitz:_________________________
Subcontractors On-site: _________________________
WorK Accomnpl ished: _____________________________
Problems Encountered: ___________________________
HART -)erson'ilelIQ - ___________________________________
AWor,, Accomnp i sned: _____________________________
pr ro , E :ncouritere.- ____________________________
E-12
- -
.~ P12
)- .~:%
cVJ
tN. r6
.,. I J
kf.)
N:Z
E-13
I(J
NC q-
E -14
-41
~QZT% c.v4
-31Z.
~ 0-i
I I
~IIlJ)
E-15
I
*~-;- It
r~~4 C-A
APPENDIX F
FIELD ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES, SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONCROSS REFERENCE AND DATES OF SAMPLE ANALYSES
(CL506OB/0528N)
APPENDIX F.1
FIELD ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
(CL506OB/0528N)
F.1-1
FIELD ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Chemical Data
Procedures for Field Measurement of pH. The pH measurement of
water samples was obtained from a portion of the sample retained
in a clean glass jar. The measurement was made immediately
following sample collection and the pH meter was allowed to
stabilize for several minutes prior to recording the
measurement. The pH meter was calibrated daily to a range of
laboratory-prepared pH buffer solutions. The users manual for
the pH meter (Corning Model 3 pH Meter) was available to field
personnel.
* Procedures for Field Measurement of Electrical Conductivity. The
electrical conductivity measurement of water samples was obtained
from a portion of the sample retained in a clean glass jar. The
measurement was made immediately following sample collection and
the conductivity meter was allowed to stabilize for several
minutes prior to recording the measurement. The conductivity
meter was calibrated daily to a laboratory-prepared standard of
known conductivity. The users manual for the electrical
conductivity meter (Markson Model 800-525-5114 Conductivity
Meter) was available to field personnel.
* Procedures for Field Measurement of Temperature. The temperature
of water samples was measured with a standard thermometer for a
portion of the sample retained in a clean glass jar. The
temperature measurement was made immediately following sample
collection and the thermometer was allowed to stabilize for
several minutes prior to recording the measurement.
(CL5060B/0528N)
F.1-2
Procedures for Field Measurement of Volatile Organics (Headspace
Analysis). Approximately 20 milliliters (ml) of soil from each
sampling location was placed in 40-ml VOA vials. The vials were
stored on ice in the field until headspace analysis could be
performed. Prior to withdrawal of headspace vapors, each vial
was placed in a 40"C hot water bath for twenty minutes. An
aliquot of air from the headspace within the vial was then
withdrawn by syringe for direct injection into the OVA.
Hydraulic Data
" Procedures for Measurements. An M-scope (Slope Indicator Co.,
Model 51453) was used to measure the water levels in each well
under static conditions. The north side of the top of the PVC
well casing (2" diameter) was marked and used as a reference
point for measurements. Water level measurements were obtained
to an accuracy of 0.01 ft.
Soil Boring Data
* Soil Sampling. Split-spoon samples were collected at each test
boring location. Split-spoons were 2-foot long, 2-inch outside
diameter and were constructed of stainless steel. Sample depth
was monitored by the subcontractor (driller) under the
supervision of the on-site HART hydrogeologist. As discussed in
Chapter III of the technical report, split-spoons were
decontaminated before and after use at each sampling depth.
Samples were described in the field by a HART hydrogeologist and
a portion of the sample was retained as a visual record.
* Blow Counts. Split-spoon samples were driven by a 130-lb hammer
falling 30 inches. Soil density was determined by recording the
number of blows necessary for the split-spoon to penetrate six
inches of soil.
(CLS060B/0528N)
F.1-3
SAMPLE NUMBERING SYSTEM
A sample numbering system was used to identify each sample taken
during the on-site field investigation. The numbering system provides a
tracking procedure to allow retrieval of information about a particular
site and assure that each sample is uniquely numbered. A listing of
sample numbers was maintained by the HART field team leader. Each sample
number consisted of four parts, as described below.
Project Identification
The designation MAFB was used to identify the Minot Air Force Base.
Site Identification
Each sampling site was identified by an identifier code, with one of
the following prefixes:
COE - Corps of Engineers well;
DW - Deep well;
MW - Monitoring well (not installed by HART);
SD - Sediment sample;
SW - Shallow well (number after indicates a shallow well sample
number);
SW - Surface water (letter after indicates a surface water sample
number); and
TB - Test boring.
Numerical or alphabetical suffixes unique to each prefix follow the
identifier codes listed above.
(CL5060B/0528N)
F.1-4
Sequence Number
A code was used to identify the type of sample collected, such as:
GW - Ground water sample;
S - Surface water or sediment sample (definition of which type
of sample is in previous qualifier of sample number); and
SS - Subsurface soil sample.
Sample Depth
The depth or depth interval from which the sample was collected, if
appropriate.
Split Sampling
Where two sets of samples were collected, the labels HART, for Fred C.
Hart Associates, Inc., and USAFOEHL were used to differentiate between
samples to be sent to the USAFOEHL laboratory and samples to be sent to
HART's subcontracted laboratory (Princeton Testing Laboratory).
Examples
Examples of sample numbers are:
MAFB, TB-i, SS-5, 20'-22', HART 004. Minot Air Force Base; test
boring #1; subsurface soil sample #5; collected from a depth of
20 to 22 feet below the surface; retained by HART; 4th soil
sample collected and sent for chemical analysis.
* AFB, SWD, S , HART 026. Minot Air Force Base; surface water
Sample D; retained by HART; first surface water sample collected
at this site; 26th water sample obtained for chemical analysis.
(CL5060B/0528N)
F.1-5
MAFB, DW-3, GW-1, HART 013. Minot Air Force Base; Deep
Monitoring Well No. 3; first ground water sample collected from
this well; retained by HART; 13th water sample collected and sent
for chemical analysis.
Blanks, Knowns, Spikes, Splits and Duplicates
QC blank and duplicate samples, sent to the USAFOEHL laboratory and
the HART subcontractor, Princeton Testing Laboratory, were given sample
numbers similar to those for original samples. The identity of QC
duplicate samples was recorded in field log books, but was not marked in
any way on the sample containers.
USAFOEHL Samples
Samples sent to the USAFOEHL laboratory were accompanied by the
following information:
1. Purpose of sample (analyte);
2 Installation name (base);
3. Sample number (on container);
4. Source/location of sample;
5. Contract task number and title of project;
6. Method of collection (bailer, suction pump, air-lift pump, etc.);
7. Volumes removed before sample taken;
8. Special conditions (use of surrogates, filtering, etc.); and
9. Preservatives used, especially nonstandard types.
SOIL SAMPLING (For Laboratory Chemical Analyses)
A portion of the soil sample, collected from the least disturbed areain the center of the split-spoon, was placed in appropriately labeled VOA
vials for OVA headspace analysis, as described previously in this
Appendix. The remaining portions of the soil samples were placed in
properly labeled, laboratory-prepared glass Jars and VOA vials. The VOA
(CLSO60B/0528N)
F.1-6
vials retained for OVA headspace analysis were analyzed in the field for
the presence of volatile organic compounds and the results were recorded.
Based on OVA screening results and other criteria, soil samples were
selected for submittal to the laboratories for further analyses.
GROUND WATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING
Ground Water Level Measurements
Following completion of well installations, the ground water levels in
all wells were measured within a 24-hour period, thus constituting a
single round of ground water level measurements. The instrument probe
(N-scope: Slope Indicator Co., Model 51453) was lowered down the well and
the depth to water was measured from the top of the PVC casing at the
marked reference point. When the electrode of the M-scope came into
contact with water, an audible signal was emitted. A properly cleaned
surveyors tape was used to sound the bottom of the well.
Ground Water Sampling
In order for valid, representative ground water samples to be
collected from the monitoring wells, it was important to properly prepare
the well prior to sample collection. This preparation entailed removing
all the water which was standing in the casing and grabbing the sample
from water which had recently been recharged from the aquifer. To
accomplish this, the depth to water from the top of the PVC casing was
measured. This value was used in conjunction with the total casing length
to determine the height of the water column. The volume of water standing
in the well was then calculated. At least three times this volume was
removed or the well was bailed dry, except for the COE well where limited
access prevented bailing.
(CL5060B/0528N)
F.1-7
Once the well was adequately evacuated, sample collection was then
accomplished by lowering a stainless steel, bottom loading bailer with a
teflon check valve into the well. Each bailer was fitted with a dedicated
piece of polypropylene rope. A decontaminated bailer was used in each
well. If the bailer had not been used for well evacuation, the first bail
of water was discarded to rinse off any cleaning agents which may still
have been present on the bailer. The samples were poured directly from
the bailers into clean sample Jars for temperature, pH and specific
conductance measurements and into laboratory-prepared sample bottles and
VOA vials for subsequent laboratory analyses.
Samples bottles were placed in a cooler at 4C. Coolers were sealed
and shipped overnight to the designated laboratory. Duplicates of ten
percent of the samples were obtained and shipped to USAFOEHL. Proper
chain-of-custody procedures were followed when transferring the samples
from the field to the laboratory. In addition, accurate records were kept
of all sampling activities and included the following information: date,
time, location, sample number, depth to water measurement, method and
volume of water evacuation and sampling techniques.
(CL5060B/0528N)
APPENDIX F.2
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATIONCROSS REFERENCE AND DATES OF SAMPLE ANALYSES
(CLS060B/0528N)
F.2-1
LU
I- u
LUI.
L LI x
LI
-
C;U0pi- .i .
tc - - rr
o u*I. JJ D
LU (A
LUI- :
CA gI- .0. 00
U) ~ ~ ~ : 5~0J~
I- 0
U-~ ~ 41 2-I-J -C 0K 0W
cm 0l 401
(A .J ZA 0nLA
0D CDC,0)n
0)
-~c IxI4.
LU 0
F.2-2
u j bz gj 0
-C j
£0
.0w
w-
u w-
.0 0 )4)0.
C
z CA
co w sOf 0
-C--0 4)
CA 0 410 0 .
Co ,F dl
a. 0 CL X0 x4)z4- £L £01 (A( A )U
C~a3t0o7 : I m :
C a I.- nj I- w cI0. ; T - 1c
u3J (3 z ~ > 0 'Ea 2 0 1 1 1 w I it w 10 i 1.
F .2-3
L JU 1.- 91
U co
ad
LL
LU
5 U
0 ui
co -0 -1
L- U W-
- - I.- -A
0 51
u. iI- -l
Pn m
aa.
4,
(AZ:Al0 C
-l0 C02 0 L)C7 5- Z1 1 0
F. 2-4
LU-i
Coj-
LU
-C I
UU rA)4 4 )4
iI-. 5
UU
LU
LUU
.0 .0
2; 2;.
Co -
IC m~5
cm cm onm' mCIa
of -f '-i- W,4 zW
I.- ~ I.
z
Co .0
0. ccc Owcac o)
0)1 z a'
F. 2-5
Lu
-C
U,0 z
Li
-C U
UZ
LU
to L
Li 4.
LU
W ~
Qii 4 o 2222222
LiU
0.
U OW atC>- , D
9-4 2l P
C-4 Me -C -C 0
F. 2-6
wi
i
U
9
LU
LU I
LUU
ad - i N
c 201 -1 0 A Ai
Li U
uU)
-' I.- ID0 W
m In4, R
Li Li L-U
* 2 41
wc U)1
WC (4 0D
LU Li ( 1 ).2(2
C4 0i O2 t-E
L.M WL0
)- 2
0.0.2 , w00w m U
F.2-7
TABLE F.2.2
METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FORAROMATIC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF
WATER SAMPLES (ug)
Compound MDL(1) PQL(2) CRDL(3) PTLMDL(4)
Benzene 0.2 2 5 1Toluene 0.2 2 5 1Chlorobenzene 0.2 2 5 1Ethylbenzene 0.2 2 5 11,3-dichlorobenzene 0.4 4 10 11,2-dichlorobenzene 0.4 4 10 11,4-dichlorobenzene 0.3 3 10 1
Notes:
(1) Method Detection Limits, from: "Methods forOrganic Chemical Analysis of Municipal andIndustrial Wastewater: Method 602 - PurgeableAromatics," 49 CFR 43250, October 26, 1984.
(2) Practical Quantitation Limits, from: "TestMethods for Evaluating Solid Waste (SW846):Method 8020 - Aromatic Volatile Organics."
(3) Contract Required Detection Limits, from:"USEPA Contract Laboratory Program, Statementof Work for Organics Analysis," July, 1987.
(4) Method Detection Limits as reported byPrinceton Testing Laboratory.
Legend:
ug/l - micrograms per liter
(CL514OA/7)
F.2-8
TABLE F.2.3
METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FORHALOGENATED VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF
WATER SAMPLES (ug/1)
Compound MDL(I) PQL(2) CRDL(3) PTLMDL(41
Chloromethane 0.08 0.8 10 20Bromomethane 1.18 11.8 10 10Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.81 18.1 NA 5Vinyl chloride 0.18 1.8 10 2Chloroethane 0.52 5.2 10 2Methylene chloride 0.25 2.5 5 5Trichlorofluoromethane NA NA NA 5I,I-Dichloroethene 0.13 1.3 5 11,1-Dichloroethane 0.07 0.7 5 1Trans-1,2-dichloroethene 0.10 1.0 5 1Chloroform 0.05 0.5 5 21,2-Dichloroethane 0.03 0.3 5 11,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.03 0.3 5 2Carbon tetrachloride 0.12 1.2 5 2Bromodichloromethane 0.10 1.0 5 21,2-Dichloropropane 0.04 0.4 5 1Trans-1,1-dichloropropene 0.20 2.0 5 5Trichloroethene 0.12 1.2 5 2Dibromochloromethane 0.09 0.9 5 21,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.02 0.2 5 5Cis-1,3-dichloropropene 0.34 3.4 5 52-Chloroethylvinylether 0.13 1.3 NA 5Bromoform 0.20 2.0 5 101,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.03 0.3 5 10Tetrachloroethene 0.03 0.3 5 2
Notes:
(1) Method Detection Limits, from: "Methods for Organic ChemicalAnalysis of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater: Method 601 -
Purgeable Halocarbons," 49 CFR 43250, October 26, 1984.
(2) Practical Quantitation Limits, from: "Test Methods for EvaluatingSolid Waste (SW 846): Method 8010 - Halogenated Volatile Organics."
(3) Contract Required Detection Limits, from: "USEPA Contract Laboratory
Program, Statement of Work for Organics Analysis, July, 1987.
(4) Method Detection Limits as reported by Princeton Testing Laboratory.
Legend:
ug/l - micrograms per literNA - Not Applicable
(CL5140A/7)
F. 2-9
C-J
-
- SCD
o- -J a, C> *~N CoL C o0 .
LaJ4J
-Jj
ot
-0-
ov Go 0 l
(V~S 04- A S
u 3.- c S-14 4--
(/) r.- V)-.%A $
Eu0
=. 0S.- tv
Li.. 4 ' .
.4- M .. 4-
-0 -beLU0 S- *
-q) (1 'U 4-) 0 > 4I- cr -D .4-1. 0-) + a)
4-.4E S--CL
4-0 4UJ = 0W0 (#u u u ww 4 4.1 t
1 r- U --. 0C.. C)0 oL
o W.. *4-O' V~ W0..X:Im
06 1~ (v ~ .O
4-)~00 m + m -
4-4 wq... 'U S-
F.2-1O
C-
-he
I-
LL--
I-c
Z CL. w4 JC
U- %JDu-'44i~
C -J 0 -
-4 L) (A -D -4- D- >C l-- - Dm- DCM UJC3 -
-i a-J >
CD -JJ V "--ICO COC)Cl-1-4C M - DC
30 C; C; C ; C ;C ;c ;c C
0 0V~0 4U 000 0(~- 00C C00wQLI.J~ Ii
-4 =~ a)~ w0s- ) C 0 c% J-
FE 0 0 0 0 4 S- 06
o ~ ooooooO W cuMI JM041c
S- == = 0 - W0 r-0) 0 S ao 0 L-4-J J C 4-. $- E 6- c a$- w
a 0 ) W W 00 CLU W 0
- W a 0. 0 v S-0 - c S = c Sea r I+ S- U - S-a S S- S-0 +- 0 Q t 0~
= M-0 M - 0 0 U4J r 0 W -- 4J 4="a -- W " -r- W m 0 -- M r_ 1a
+J 43 - -= - = -4JU= -S U S-1 0
oU S. S L S. S JCO ccci cU040.~ U
F.2-11l
: 000
30-i Ul, In Ul
>
cn cm- CP>- -he 0
-i -.% C..
cn Vfl) cr 0 0- a) 0 10D U)L4L u .U 0OcnC C o .0 4.) 0=C -40 _j toC Lfl M~ m- 0 cr_- =~ J C3- U~ 0A 1- t
... 0 -
a~ OL J in 4-JI
In 1-.CE) m
C J ri. I J R 4-) 4J_j I- jw to co a - (AaL LOC4l Cl cl C-! 4-1 LI. OCO w
*U ocol 'r) C-co CD0iI -W C- l -
I- ~ C~ I-~> 04-) U)
o U (A a. .
=CU 1, c S. ~ >-~~~C C)CE) 01 ~).
m0401 .01 00c m .J 44A
(AS4-J 2 0
4-) 0 CC 4-0- 4-) $-0) ' e.
S- tv 11) C304
0 -1- S-ES
C 0 0 -- 0 2 41- 0 (v(0) 04
r_ 4J4 u. to) to= Q) 0-C 4) 0 0 S-0.
>~ 00 V.) o:24.0cc -1.. ) 04- UD 00r
.C0 04-0 00 0 S-UC
4-) 0)S- '0 'a cc .s-.< -441 0 O..o S- d 0 2=
,a 0o - = CE-C 4J 4. =C 4.)C - o 1 C%1. 4-J'04- 4.) 4J00j 0C4 -U Q) 05-0( 0.4-) 01
01 0 ,- C%! CO ) 0 4-Z (-)(AIO -a4 EC . V I. LA
0 Sf Wa 0 -C"J mE f 0)~(.
F.2-12
TABLE F.2.6
METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FORACID AND BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC ANALYSES OFWATER SAMPLES (ug/l)
Compound MDL(I) PQL(2) CRDL(3) PTLMDL(4)
Acenaphthene 1.9 19 10 10Acenaphthylene 3.5 35 10 10Anthracene 1.9 19 10 10Benzidine 44.0 440 NA 100Benzo(a)Anthracene 7.8 78 10 10Benzo(a)Pyrene 2.5 25 NA 10Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 4.8 48 10 10Benzo(ghi)Perylene 4.1 41 NA 10Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 2.5 25 NA 10Bis-(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane 5.3 53 10 10Bis-(2-Chloroethyl)Ether 5.7 57 10 10Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether 5.7 57 10 10Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 149.0 25 10 104-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether 1.9 19 10 10Butyl Benzyl Phthalate 2.5 25 10 102-Chloronaphthalene 1.9 19 10 104-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether 4.2 42 10 10Chrysene 2.5 25 10 10Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene 2.5 25 NA 101,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.9 19 10 101,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.9 19 10 101,4-Dichlorobenzene 4.4 44 10 103,3-Dichlorobenzidine 16.5 165 20 20Diethyl Phthalate 1.9 19 10 10Dimethyl Phthalate 1.6 16 10 10Di-n-Butyl Phthalate 2.5 25 10 102,4-Dinitrotoluene 5.7 57 10 102,6-Dinitrotoluene 1.9 19 10 10Di-n-Octylphthalate 2.5 25 10 101,2-Diphenylhydrazine NA NA NA 10Fluoranthene 2.2 22 10 10Fluorene 1.9 19 10 10Hexachlorobenzene 1.9 19 10 10Hexachlorobutadiene 0.9 9 10 10Hexachlorocyclopentadiene NA NA 10 10Hexachloroethane 1.6 16 10 10Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 3.7 37 NA 10Isophorone 2.2 22 10 10Naphthalene 1.6 16 10 10Nitrobenzene 1.9 19 10 10
Table continued on next page;Legend and notes appear on last page of table.
(CL5140A/7)
F.2-13
TABLE F.2.6 (Continued)
METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FORACID AND BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC ANALYSES OFWATER SAMPLES (ug/l)
Compound MDL(1) PQL(2) CRDL(3) PTLMDL(4)
N-Nitrosodimethylamine NA NA NA 10N-Nitrosodi-n-Propylamine NA NA 10 10N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1.9 19 10 10Phenanthrene 5.4 54 10 10Pyrene 1.9 19 10 101,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.9 19 10 102-Chlorophenol 3.3 33 10 102,4-Dichlorophenol 2.7 27 10 102,4-Dimethylphenol 2.7 240 10 104,6-Dinitro-2-Cresol NA NA 50 502,4-Dinitrophenol 42.0 420 50 502-Nitrophenol 3.6 36 10 104-Nitrophenol 2.4 24 50 504-Chloro-3-Cresol NA 30 10 10Pentachlorophenol 3.6 36 50 50Phenol 1.5 15 10 102,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2.7 27 10 10
Notes:
(1) Method Detection Limits, from: "Methods for Organic ChemicalAnalysis of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater: Method 625 -Base/Neutrals and Acids," 49 CFR 43250, October 26, 1984.
(2) Practical Quantitation Limits, from: "Test Methods for EvaluatingSolid Wastes (SW 846): Method 8250 - Semivolatile Organics."
(3) Contract Required Detection Limits, from: "USEPA Contract LaboratoryProgram, Statement of Work for Organic Analysis," July, 1987.
(4) Method Detection Limits as reported by Princeton Testing Laboratory.
Legend:
ug/l - micrograms per literNA - Not Applicable
(CL514OA/7)
F .2-14
S- 0o0u
CC
-j-
04)4
a) 41
CD 44.-%C% C J~O co 4.-
U--C
LAJ wo- c
M 0
44 C 0LU -a) - 4J 0
(A 4-J-
- CC m)
Ci-) c-) 41
co -) CL U S
-% m% 0 4). qd P to) f) ) LOr-lOOO foo 0 .0 ) C.
cd) Co. C>0 O .. O 0 0 CoC 4-WC >C C c Dm oC --. 0 > C> 0>4-)>oC>C, DC>C > A a
~~~~ I+000000S- >)
o'C w (-.$I = U 4-)
Z~ E*0 06
.~~~~~4' .. 0 .. ..-- (U.-.. '""-U O f.r P -rC
cma 4j-~
C)))4- 4-)
- 'U.CL) Io~~~c c'>.,~J w
o 0 wl .-*
C-) m) 0- r D4-- 'a'S. S.C >,0 - -+
W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -4 co=oW.0S -0 lM LJL.) .) -J 1* CC n V) X r
F.2-15
u,__j
o0 -J4 - DC DCo -lC
U) a
-J
0 IU)c
CoCLoCLDC 0 )C C 0C0.0 - % * nkDk r-~ -* 1 0
t7C 4- % n" m(Dr-I-c )COc
LlJ
C)
4J +j
>1 cS- 0
( C3 S) (v 0O0OC OO C 0 0.
0 M 0 U) 0 S 1 MWrU)J L.) -. r4C0nV I-M0 )
I-P
0 0~
4--) ~01
=01
F.2-16
TABLE F.2.9
METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FOR TOTAL PETROLEUMHYDROCARBON ANALYSIS (EPA 418.1) OF WATER SAMPLES
HARTSampleNumber SOWMDL (mg/l)(1) PTLMDL (mg/l)( 2)
001 1 0.5003 1 0.5004 1 0.5005 1 0.5006 1 0.5007 1 0.5008 1 0.5009 1 0.5010 1 0.5Ol 1 1.o(3)012 1 0.5013 1 2.0(3 )014 1 0.5015 1 0.5017 1 0.5018 1 0.5019 1 0.5020 1 4.0( 3 )021 1 0.5022 1 0.5023 1 0.5024 1 0.5025 1 0.5026 1 0.5027 1 0.5
Notes:
(1) Detection Limit applicable to the analytical method specified in theUSAF MAFB IRP Phase II Statement of Work (EPA 418.1).
(2) Method Detection Limits as reported by Princeton Testing Laboratory.(3) Higher detection limits due to the lesser volume of sample available
for analysis.
Legend:
mg/l - milligrams per liter
(CL5056B/20)
F.2-17
TABLE F.2.10
METHOD DETECTION LIMITS FOR TOTAL PETROLEUMHYDROCARBON ANALYSIS (EPA 418.1)OF SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES
SOWMDL(I) PTLMDL(2 )
I mg/kg 10.0 mg/kg
Notes:
(1) Detection Limit applicable to the analytical method specified inthe USAF MAFB IRP Phase II Statement of Work.
(2) Method Detection Limits as reported by Princeton Testing Laboratory.
Legend:
mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram
(CL5056B/20)
F. 2-18
C;i C
U- a) '
A-
va)4z *DU
oD u4 - ---
o3 m
o ~o v
CD 1 0L 4n -" C1 -4w-4m
0- w LrC;0- w'0i 0o M CDM.0C
en 4J
S-I. 4.o 4-0 a
U)- C 4..4.
~~r_ U
o0 >)L>. 4-C .00
41 CLM- CL. atoS-
CD to Cos. 4.) # - o&=1 a,-. 5-= 1 - J 0 4I- o = . = 0 = 0m
U) CO. u0.co 0
a~~a, S.. 5
0 .0r
I-~~4 4-J , 0 4-) a,
O~~ ~ w LLr.,.r
o~~~~4 0 OS-S.U 40 O 09- 0 .C. 0 V 0 )
U *.' cI -G P-- P - -8 P- "M r" -I P" F-
i
C.0 CAo% to wo wo to to wo to to wo wo % to to
V) J 04 C-4 CMJ 0) 0 0D CM 0 r-4 - - C~i C-J 1-M P- 1 4 - . 4 -4 -4
o i I - -4 V- - -d 4 -.
1I to to to to w to to to %D to to to to to
cc La. m1 0 co - 0 0 D -4 0" 0D 0 D 0CD'I.- m).. 081 en. en N.. m. N. m. m. M. en. M. e. . n.V)'- OU. 0m 0 0 0- 0i 0 0- 0% '1- 1- 0- 0- 0
w ca u m CD) D~ ~ CD) C> ( CD Co) C>) r) CD) CD) C>00 C c - r- r4 .- 4 1 .*4 4 - -
00
VC to to to to to to to to %0 to to to to to081 0. im 0 0 0D 0% 0 01 0% > D a%
m.8 r" C1 e. M 04. c% V) CV C1 cm C14 en. Mj c44 CD N.D N.D CD C51 N.D Co CD N. N ND.
C C
0 0 c0u 0 0 w1 w w1 81w 18 180+j3 413 4.) 4.) 4) .- .1 4.3 41 4.3 41 4.3 4.3 41 c
EU E) -0 - 0 M -0 V -0 -0 0 i540 4- 0~
CLES 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0~
CA to cm (a co c a ca to CI m oL.. . w Lo wui C0
c -
4a) CJ
E E Co- CD) > C> Qo Co 0 0) 0 -- 1 e'J i) 4 mn 9- ifIV ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . -DJ 0C DC C C lC DCW)
F. 2-20
4 r CCm cn M~ *-' '- - - -
-4 -4 -4 - 1- 1" 1- -4 -
LiJJ
-o - to to to to to 40 t o o t=) CC w O m O m O m O w O w t U to o
-% 0LL- > 4 m 1"- -4 4 - 4
cm U0 Co -o 40 Co Co CD --00 N N . N . N N .0) ev I-- 44 1- 1-4 1-4 -4 -4 -4
CD:
Do C) C.0
w. co to co c o t to to Lw u 00 C> CO Co C> Co CD to 1-1 to- to
CA tm N. C. Co* N. Cp C> -- 1 16 -4 -1" L ~ 0J O -4 --4 -4 -4 -4 -4 -4 . . N
s-s- 00. 0 0- 0 0 w 0) a) a)-
4Ji 4-~0) 0 . ) 4- -) 4, .- I to t
~- 00
CS:~e ru tot t o o t
C0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S- S- S- S.4 CD C.D C CD c'7 C) rv' e'4 (V
C, u. 0o 0 0o 0 "0 "0 .u '10
0 4 . 4 ~ 4-4
S.. 1- S.-0-.S.- S- S.. S. S.- S.- ) 0) 0I--
E - I C c CI C> Cn Cc 0O %0
~-A D C) CD Co 40 Co C) C> Co C>
F.2-21
1" -- - -
4- to to to
0C( M j (A c j c. co ctj oa c4LW E >. - -, - I I- -- I
-I a S., Lfl Lt) Lf Lfl
::- 'UW- (A4-
-j ) .9o. o o 0 o o c -
-1 >1>111 1- . 11c
LUU
-/ 4 - 4 4 4 -1 -
9-4 mO D4-
LL. W'- 1-L m - ~l c l
C/ 3 w0 >.,I U) 1 -LI >- .0 0 Co Co CD Co Co Co to a
o~ --Ic c c cc c c c c
cc
e %.0 to t0 to k0 k0 t0 ko0w cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc
OiL C14 C'J CJ csJ C) C/ ' C)a0.. 4..1a) Co \ ~ ' % ' 'J C~ .
(U, N N.. .. N. * .63 4J 4-3. (0r 0 0 0 0 0o
CL
4-' 4-- 4-' %4. w w w-CD - S- - S- C C C C
a) - E9 4- ) a a )0M, ' ad' Sfl V) S- CL
V) tn an) tn V) Ln (4 tvU 0 L Li ) Cd) Cd) /) 0(U (U U (U
WE U) U) UO Co CD 4- 4D C> aDI)-
to/o)C CO C>) (/) Co CD) Co (V U
F.2-22I0
**0I- 4 .6114 -
f.) a. x4 W E ~ v
E 0l
C=
41fC
0i1.* -- co co G E E o CE) to Go G o co Go GoLno C. w u 4JN -4 9-' - . W- Z; -" '. -04EV cct JM t o - .0 - n - nL n w
w o . 1 11 - - - 11 11 11 ~
*0 co to Go co Go co co to to co co to Go Go
MLL S. m M. %n %n C$ n %n %- cn CV m c
L& Lj1 - - 1 4. 4 4 - 84 .4 - .4Cl. .0 CD - C' Cl CDJ (%C) J - C.J CJ .- D CDJ Co
0j 1- W 4 -MI- - 14 -4 -4 -4 1-4 94 4
-
%D 0.0 to to 0 00 o to .0 to 0 to to t
co C* CDi e. n In - - ~ n C~I In In .j In In In In m
4= 0D 40 C0 DI CD CD D- -4 -4 -4 - - 4 4 -0i -4 944 "4 1-4 1" 14 -q 9I. -
mC cc- cc t to o tto m go cc t to to t) ta to
*~I00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0mG4.1 S- S- S- S- S- S.. S- I- L. . S- L. en N
V)-5. Lo) Lo CD) LO C.0 to) LD) Lo) ca) to) Lai Lo ) Lo L L -A
0 = O.0 P- 0 0 0 0 0 0toi = 0) 0D - CD C> CD r4 1" 4 94 -4 -4 9-i i .
C) 0 0 CD CD CD Co CD 0 0 D 0 40 CD
F.2-23
.9- m, (n -% -%C>
0 'a
(A
S m
-4;) r-0
S.-5.-LU 04- to
.9 - C. -
-i 0 4
LUI
toI to
'o LU O 4-' -
C UL Coe
4-
< cm m Lfl to to0 U31 00 4.LL 05- -- 1-1 S. S.. S.
= 0D ca +_3 -4 -4 -4 -u 0D x -4 -6 -4 -4 - -4
-j LA - LM
On.
IV .- - e m m-
0-0-
4-a co to #0 to 4.o to
0 - 0 4- -. . ", 1-- 11-1
M- 0-5- (l) COi CO(0( 4
-
0- rc m m t
+ O 0 S- s., S- S. S.
0.- = CO C~J C%J C4j c'J e'cn -I S.. C. C) 40 Co C
o 1 F. 2-24
I- -
t oto to to,a 3G to 03 %o Go 00 0o t0 c3 to
ON WO S.. t .. t to N to
. .~ . .-. . .. . . .r- - I--4
-4--4-
4- N -I u M. (A u a a u a a) a a a utU .~ . f . ft . ^ . .00
Zc IV.0S- m a 0$-O m .LO U)m -m w.0 L.O m w mS. m
4- 0I to to to tD to0 -S Go ~ co, cococ
.-- / Lj W ~ 4A e -1 -4 '-
CDJ CU an -, I--- 'S. SO. 0-.- - Co 0C0>CM1-4 -4--
In (-n
Cl 3c
-i =U- kot t
co C CDJ -0 to to to to to
Li 3j > cc .. C') CD" Co) (>V-) ~ EU -' cc 0 0
U.0 0I 0o 0D 0Co
--i
-- o0 to to to to to
Li) ~ 0 Co-'O 0CD1 1
aU. CD) C> CDJ w'
M0coI
"a "a V 0
o 0 0 00.) 4-a 4- CL
0 -I CCo C C) Co m0 wOCt4 04 0Cocu
m cx I,- 0 - w w 0 0o 04 r- c0 t- Go
=0 40 40 4 0 4 0
Go 0 D C0 0 0 0D O 0 %0 c0 k c0 %00 Go 0 N. 1 N. ~ N. 1 OD Go Go. N
ON 40 %.0 %0 t0 %0a . 40 N 0 Nm,- &n 0 In qw -4 qr 0w C3 n o In 0Do S* N. N. S~ . N. N. %. %%. N. .
-4 - - - - - -
V -- a C C a-. -
V) tv >1 .00 a;~ 00'C 00 a a V) L A a a atao
9 4,cv 0.010 .0.m. .0 4;0.s S c 0;.s01-4 0;.0;5.0aw a V 0 41 a. 0. 0.. 0l. coUL cnlL w c(0i cV in
4- 0 -.0 to 40 to to to to to-0'- 0 0o Go Go 0 Go Go Go
11 N .1 1- '%- 1- N, .N.- JV)~e 0Y '4(4 -4 "~ P-4 - '
.j LaJ 4JO 0j CD CD 4 m ' m ' en enC
C -
In CL. I "C4 0:L t o o t ot
CD X4i. a~ 40 40 4o 40 Go 40 Go 4CI 00 , V4 00 C0 0l 0 0
u. ^ UJ - m " M nC-l 1 >- U.0 CD 0) 0 0 0
o to -1 00-w 4 -4 - 4
0C
0 ot o t 0t
Go) Go 0 Go 00 0 Go Go
E* 041 at. at. CD ..- L . .
4.)4. 4.) 4.) 41 .1 4.) 4.) m0
3C 3: 3 9C m 93
0-IC C C C CO0. c C0
m S.. S.. S.- S-0 L. %-. a t
S.- -%
C;0 L. v
IV 4E 4-0 CD 0 . 4 m 0 C..V)l Co 0 0l 0 40 40 0D 0l t-v
I F.2-26
Go to Go % o %0 o w t o toS4% 0 0 01
SN to ~ . t * to '-. tz 0 to .D to z
CI *4 -c r, t- - * 2- f - -
-05- - L- C -05- -W.S- -0. LM S- -
* a u ea a w ea V) a. a ( a a (A a- a ao (A
V1 Go co 6 Csc. C. Go Go
-js maw .Oo .C m .n~. 0a0 -j aa a an aD a D aD a2 aCoaaaa
w= -0 =o 0.000 0.5Z .10) 00-) 0050 .5a.14 :I_ 0UEL 0U ~ 0 f ~ ~ n ) ~
41 Cou
I ct o Go to Go toU- c 4.'- 0 m 0- 0 0
&0 UJI No .S.. m. e nM n.LU u to) O i 0 1-1 %-"4-.. j P".J Ow- -. qV) zi) zi' zi)Cc co -j w4 m
Go Goco oG
cm (n2 (nI
41 41 5-f to +o )o to totoJ 00 iv0 v m 0v 00 01
LV Lul 05 .N. -. NLA. U) 4E 01 -t- 4 4"4
>% 0 E z c
w0-j o
Eu.-~~~ C4i Co Y V C)C)'Os-~~~s N.N 4 . .N.
o 00 0% 0 06.1" 1-4 CM "4i "4 k
V) C CD C C 4 gm
F.2-2 7
.9- >c- -4 F% c r L W n lt L w L9j - 'a
N o to to to 00
4.) > I I ~ I I I I~- IOr- U) (n W 0) ql 0> Rr 0o W 0
- -4 r- -4 -4
-b Cr- C A r...) C- LO-> 11. (4 (. a-V)t
x) c 0 - .0 S .0 S- tm .0W s-t .0 S-w' w l U aocn(V) a V) ( ca Ln (i m (4 f
z Cto-0 to to to to to
0.J.a coa 0o 0o 00 0o
a -i w U N.1 *-v Co oC 1 c a1 -'. 1-1
CD w
-nQ
*v CDi. CDi tV o Go to co co. La- w~,~ w . N.1 N.1 N..LL- LJ +j-S. > e 0 0n m 0nL. LJV) 000 M. N.. N.. m N C
6-4 ->. U.0 0l -4-4-tuJ j3 w .4 -- 1 -4-
C) <
0-a) to to to MD tow u "I. 1-- 1%.*N
U)~C C>), ~ iC. Cl.
w) 4-) 4J M4
0 u x 0
0.(4-- 4- 4- 4- 4-Ca>02F 0 S.- .S-S-
5- C
aen
Cr>
I-- a-
S~ .0@ O)= 0~ .J %J ..)c'.. C'.) 0
CMD 0cP 0 00 09-
F.2-28E
u '-
to~
~0 ~ cl
4- _ W.0 S-
a '-.
CM ->--
0-4
4LU co--S- C
z C
cn 4- W .
~~~F ...0a 4n)
>1 0. EV $- U
o to
S. (A o 4
4v Li- WaRii
w. C'> .0 LE e) -jtv 0. ( (
V) m
F.2-29
4J
-o to %D to to to to to to63 01 n 0n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0
CoN .. coo Co Co CD N. .
14 0 0o %0 0o 0o 0 0 0
aw - -V - 4 - ~ C 4 -4j
co LU
to il
-i cn
tO i01 to to to to to wo to to- C -- Q 4J Go 0 o 0 o Go 0 0 ca 0
4- S-Z 04.3 I- FN N, N N N< * C'j C%J CsJ cli C'J cJ C..j
LL 0C 3 v .m. N. N1 %1- N. .LL..mQq cc. 0 0 0> 0 C> 0D 0o 0>
i 0 00l I= -j -4 -4 -.4 - - -
VI) I
4OI t0 w to to to 4.0 to 403S Go0 o 0 0 o c0 o 0
L ~ C43 1-r- t. - 11-1.. f-00 0 CoJ 0. CJ ( CJ ( CoJ CD C 4
06 c
03 o cct o o t to oS.. - 0D u a) 0 0 0 a
0 0 r- 0 .r- vw (A 4- 4- N4- 4
C r N." SN. L. S- N. 0) (A N0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0
CL0.0
V 0 0D 0> 0> C . 4.3 Co. 4.o
F.2- 30
43-4
,a 00, 0o c) 0o 0) 0
w O N to % toD- W CD -It C> to r COD
~ -- 4 -4-
-C4 ~ 4L~C4SO
-% LU
43 I 4) 14-)4U'X-' 4 4V
~c c0
43 b 01 to to toC 0 41i C OC
o O-~ 4 N.N.r%0) CU -t- CO CO
C J LU.1 -4 LL
-a O-a. tn-j C) S-Icc 0D>- "a l tow to to
~....J 4 4~ > O CC O
w430 CIJ CVJ 2--
m43 0 0 0- 0 r4 S__ tn w 4CO -
'CI- =. __ - -4
Vf) - rJ M
w~~~ 43'L t .
41 to 00 00L CP43 w O CO Wtu -J1"
04 00 0>0.% ~~CA -S -.-
S_~ aS
M2 L
S - 43c
0) %.. -0 cau -C4- 4 - r- -O6-0 1-e
01 4) (14 > CD O h 0
F.2-31
TABLE F.2.17
SAMPLE CHRONOLOGIES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES
HART Type Date ActualSample of Date Received by Date HoldingNumber Sample Collected Laboratory Analyzed Time (days)
001 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19
003 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19
004 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20
005 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20
006 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20
007 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19
008 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19
009 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20
010 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20
011 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20Equipment Blank
012 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20
013 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19
014 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19
015 Ground Water 10/29/86 10/30/86 11/18/86 20Equipment Blank
017 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19
018 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19
019 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19
Table continued on next page.
(CL514IA/7)
F.2-32
TABLE F.2.17 (Continued)
SAMPLE CHRONOLOGIES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES
HART Type Date ActualSample of Date Received by Date HoldingNumber Sample Collected Laboratory Analyzed Time (days)
020 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19
021 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19
022 Ground Water 10/30/86 10/31/86 11/18/86 19
023 Surface Water 11/02/86 11/03/86 11/20/86 18
024 Surface Water 11/02/86 11/03/86 11/20/86 18
025 Surface Water 11/02/86 11/03/86 11/20/86 18
026 Surface Water 11/02/86 11/03/86 11/20/86 18
027 Surface Water 11/02/86 11/03/86 11/20/86 18
(CL5141A/7)
F.2-33
TABLE F.2.18
SAMPLE CHRONOLOGIES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON ANALYSISOF SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES
HART Date ActualSample Type of Date Received by Date HoldingNumber Sample Collected Laboratory Analyzed Time (days)
001 Subsurface 10/22/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 15Soil
002 Subsurface 10/22/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 15Soil
003 Subsurface 10/22/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 15Soil
004 Subsurface 10/22/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 15Soil
005 Surface 10/23/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 14Sediment
006 Surface 10/23/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 14Sediment
007 Surface 10/23/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 14Sediment
008 Surface 10/23/86 10/27/86 11/06/86 14Sediment
009 Subsurface 10/24/86 10/27/86 11/19/86 26Soil
010 Subsurface 10/24/86 10/27/86 11/19/86 26Soil
011 Subsurface 10/24/86 10/27/86 11/19/86 26Soil
(CL5141A/8)
F.2-34
CC - -I
4- O , qV C% ONCoJ' C..C.C. " e-tm N4D C)C)J W mC
o - I O(D OO Ot~ -- S V . >C 4- N o C, D.D'.DIm No -I -. -"I-. '
r_. (D C -1 -4 C J ) c ) 0 - - 4 % -qe ~ 0 -q 4 0-pC > r 4 4 r-4 r %J
C 0 -1-4 q 4 - r-OO4 -4- 4 -4 - 00 -44 -4 -4 -4 .4Ln-- -- - ---
C-,
U)00 00 00
CD 4-) 4-2 4-) 4- 4-) 4-3
- c +j 4) (cc4 0) -a)) (1 a a 03330 0 " 3(1 D( 03 U30010 tv 0) ( ) )a "aal )
uj a N 4- -* '0 - - 4j4 j -.C4.) 4-)4- - -C4-ONh C)-j 0 >- CO 'U- - -C t V-.- - L. v t '- -.- L0fu
X- C- S- S- EO )4- S-S F 0o4- - S-Er=0 0 0m 2 c o54- - 0 -0 . 4-, . 0 -o. 4- -o,-
u V-) r- r J3U 4-Q.f CLW - 6 ) C-0 Uc.04- C 4
LA- A4LL S.-IJ
CDC30 0o to 0o
C> to 1-4 - '-
CU 0 110 "10 IN,(1) ccU (D l
-O
0 D 0D 0>
(1)
S.- S- Sa) a) Q)
CLCmW E 0 C>. I c- S- 0
4--%
0-z-
E E-4
-0) tv -4C>C)
=E -n Co- C> D
F.2-35
SI
t 5t
uMCQ "C-iCJ"c~ C%l~C
tv .- en oC> 0--f-4 C*J m en > -> C~j M n > >-4 -4 CQ
C>0-f-0- ~-4 - ~ 00> - 4 -1 - -4 - -- 4 -------- ---- -0 -----
MCC C C
C.)00 00 00
S -- S- s- s-S-r
4J I J 4304- 0304- +334
C~ ~~~ w.' 43J 000003 3330W 4)034300014-~ LJ CJ Nr Ir =-r+.C4J -6J"O 4 - =4J -1 "V - .C 4-J
40 0-1 0 V .- S--0. 0. cc-..-- S- S- 0L.0 c .-.- 5- S-0C. C1- 5- 0O0 (A4- S- S- E0 0 W4- S -S00W4
c MZ CO 4 -).0 -0. 0 -0. 4. 0 -0
~ .V) u 0C4-.U m CAC-.0 U4- M (A C .0 U 4--C06V
CMJ
LL LL. L.
LW CD D' 0 to IO 0-1 0 W CL)4-1I coco
a) 0-5 0 0n en
03.0 0 0cl -J -4
LJ-J
031) co. s.. 00
4-0 Q) alh 0
0 C0 0D 0
a)) 4-)
0) Cl.
L = 0 0 a3.-
4-' 4 X
CLI sC
col = > 0 0 CV)-2= Co C Co0
F.2-36
4J V) to1 L-- a- C-o - -.,-,- -- 4 -'G 0 - - ,n ,"o ,>-4
.) I . . . .-
.UD %o t o o t otot t toto t ot of0
>1 ClC m- mC o - -4M R Ch MCQ\M J C%JC.JC'J
M M1 CDP C> ,- M-,, ( 0 1 CoC C3
C r_
00 0
4.) 4J OO4OO -)4-., Ob~ 41V O bQ-A
"." I .J -0 O 4 = +- 04 4J 4 0 - *-=4J
. .. oj • • ,, .. I
4J D - 0 I C ---- S- --v-- S5- tv - - --- M Ir_ = - - . 0- - o4 S-S- 0 w- S-S- E 00---
e-) CD < CC-. .= = -- %= =S
LD C to
-6j co 00 0
-. 0 4 C>C
0i~3 3c CCCC 0 C
'cC ~a).) aa)4C~t (/ I 0 00 0 J W 00 W 0~ ZLJ C I C 4.)--.C.) .- ~.C4-
4.) -1 >.I 0--L I. 0. 0 I- 3 0.0 0r-... .. .C>C Z~ *.--I S.LE~cn4 I....E0u~4 S-S-E04-'4
0 ~ CO 0r-~r- LO
0'~to-, O~VJ
F.2-37
CV CY e C4%I C'JC%j CY
41 en f"~0 0C 00 c c e c 40
cm 0 O~~~~ zi OO~ ir -- 0P)C)0~44CJ W0-4 -4C~ V- ""
C 00~4 44 -44 - "-- w-4 00-4-- 14
LaJ
P-1
vw www 0 0 w.64 00- 00 001-J J4b .1b4
c 0 .r- L - s -f 4-4.
m J0 4 00- 00
4o 6& CL CA 4.4Jr c0r 4-'4 Q- CL0 -- u.4. 4- L %A-
* LA-.
0- U-
-1 0 W 4-)I cocGca -01 EU.-S 0 -(aJ -". . .8-1
0.4J co Go G
4J w C
C EL
0 0
CL sU 0
CC
0= W) 40 CD
F. 2- 38
to - 4.tG iO 4 4- c nC .).- l i lC >-
4-39- Co r-4 l00-4 M MCDC M C 400 -cV c'c>C% CJCJC% rC'JC-%1C-'J > - 1 4CDC r4- r4r-
C) 00 .4-- 00 - -- 00- - -
U.41
4n 0J0 0 4A4J 0 0 04 J0
L) 0n c 4-(+ L(4- C A C . 4-Cal cc.--*9 9 9
a)cCm) CCa CaUI WW4- .0+ ~ a4.
C " UI WS)O 'W WW V E a -aG'V
(D C .U-0 C .Ud-.f C.L~d0
- LLI
CJ
U7 4') I
ton eo Vol )-J 0o C>)-J
0 .rL.) - -4
(-.)3
4- 3
Z aC I 0. '0
4 O4
0- CD) C C)
F. 2- 39
mlm
w- N
to -- M C- ~LO C 4C D oC > C -- I~O l%O1CJ CD (D 4 4 A- -- "- F- 4 -4-
-cI 0000I 0000OO~
4-4C Ob1 c4-1 '-4 4-A'-
o 5-.. L.C V t -S Lr o- S - c-- - .1 0 - S. - r 4 0 04- - sl- r4 o 0 V4-
---- 4-r - 4---4.4O - 4--- --
-
Z LC CD CCotot.- A WaD w - W o0
(l 00 0 00
0w~1~ 4J4 4J 414J m cu *U*
0~CA C. (n 4~0-0 -4n ),'0
c-cz
CS-eU..
I- =- SW en-;=J cc>l --.- -
o1 CD0 *-
F .2-40
+j. >1 0% r-4 Co en -WO -4c awr-oo 0% " l 0 o CU a 1 -.I- - -- , - --- - -- 4-l % N.% 11 1
r_-0- 4rI- "- - - rIr4 rf14rI"4rI- -
4J ~ ~ -j 0 1 C - --- --IV-- -r5Mt o- -- - C-
-D - s----= - --- - -S..- -
-
CC CD 0 t k-A CDw0 00 co c
co -1 41 > -
C~ Col 01 C>O~ 0 0 0 0 W 0~
C ~- -- I 1--004- 33-ooS - S-L 0t)4
00 uZ CuJ4~.Z0 -~0 ~t CQU40.f CC.U40 .) to 0 4-.f
II LJ CA
toiL = -ILL. =1 C>I CO Co
F. 2-41
Mow~
Do to to to to ko to to to% to t ot ok ot ot ot
C ~ ~ Nv P- F- -C~ >C ~4 - 4 ~.4 --4 -- 4 -- mnIlLlIlI
-JCDu0 a >C oC C oC >CO C lC
-a
~J 0 wa. to f.0 w-.- tot*t-.wt- t o otot o otot I
LUw 04J CD0 % %C % D.u% DDZ C mC C .
0"e QCje nc ne * c nc nMC lC pC.0 ClC >CUCC DC DC C o C DUJ .l- 4- 4- 4- . 4- 4 . 4r 4- 4-
L.- L.S-L .S . - r.s . S-M 4 )W QW WWWWDUOW WW)4++--
0,4-J4JfV-O f f J+ 4a4)+)+b4J4)M MCM0 CC O9 CM+ M C~O M M CC 3 M 39 39
IV0 000O0~00000O0000000 CS.LJCsJ
m w=nt Or- C .t n .. 0 ~ 0 n.4 0 0oo C) ol c oo C >C o 4- - 4-- 0 0 .-. q.4. CM'"
f^ 10. Co - -- -C-- -- 0 C> CD -DC 2 DC DQ lC C C
F.2-42TABLE IV-F.2.21
COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY CRITERIA TOPTL DETECTION LIMITS FOR EPA METHOD 601/602: AROMATIC AND
HALOGENATED VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSES
Detection LimitsAvailable Water
Parameter Water Soil Quality Criteriaug/T ug/kg ug/h
Halogenated Volatile OrganicsChioromethane 20 800 0.19(e)Bromomethane 10 400 0.19(e)Dichiorodifluoromethane 5 200 0.19(e)Vinyl Chloride 2 80 2.0(a);0(k);1(l)Chloroethane 2 80 No established levelMethylene Chloride 5 200 150(h)Trichlorofluoromethane 5 200 0.19(e)1,1-Dichloroethene 1 40 0.03(a);7.O(k);7.0(1)1,1-Dichloroethane 1 40 No established levelTrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 40 270(g);70(c)Chloroform 2 40 0.19(a);100(f)1,2-Dichloroethane 1 40 0.94(a);0(k);5.0(1)1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2 80 18,400(d);1,000(i);200(k);200(1)Carbon Tetrachloride 2 80 0.4(a);20(g);0(k);5.0(1)Bromodichioromethane 2 80 0.19(e); 100(f)1,2-Dichloropropane 1 40 6(c)Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5 200 87(d)Trichloroethene 2 80 2.7(a);0(k);5.0(1);2,000(j)Dibromochloromethane 2 80 100(f)1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 200 0.6(a)Cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5 200 87(d)2-Chloroethylvinylether 5 200 No established levelBromoform 10 400 0.19(e);100(f)1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10 400 1.7(a)Tetrachioroethene 2 80 0.8(a);20,000(k)
Aromatic Volatile OrganicsBenzene 1 40 0.66(a);0(k);5.0(1)Toluene 1 40 14,300(d);2,000(c)Chlorobenzene 1 40 No established levelEthylbenzene 1 40 1,400(d);680(c)1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 40 400(d)1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 40 400(d);620(c)1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 40 400(d);750(k);750(l)
Legend appears on next page.
(C L5141 A/5)
F.2-43
TABLE F.2.21 (Continued)
COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY CRITERIA TOPTL DETECTION LIMITS FOR EPA METHOD 601/602: AROMATIC AND
HALOGENATED VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSES
Legend:
(a) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria corresponding to an incrementalincrease in lifetime cancer risk of 10-6; Federal Register, Vol. 45, No.231, 11/28/80.
(b) National Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards: Maximum ContaminantLevel; USEPA 40 CFR 141.
(c) Proposed Recommended Maximum Contaminant Level: NIPDWS, Federal Register,Vol. 50, No. 219, 11/13/85.
(d) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria based upon human health effects;Federal Register, Vol. 45, No. 231, 11/28/80.
(e) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for total Halomethanes correspondingto an incremental increase in lifetime cancer risk of 10- 6 ; FederalRegister, Vol. 45, No. 231, 11/28/80.
(f) National Interim Primary Drinking Water Standard for totalTrihalomethanes; USEPA 40CFR141.
(g) Suggested No Adverse Response Level for ten day drinking water exposure;EPA, Vol. 3, No. 17, 4/30/82.
(h) Suggested No adverse Response Level for long-term drinking waterexposure; EPA, Vol. 3, No. 17, 4/30/82.
(i) Suggested No Adverse Response Level for chronic drinking water exposure;EPA, Vol. 3, No. 17, 4/30/82.
(j) Suggested No Adverse Response Level for one day (child) drinking waterexposure; EPA Vol. 3, No. 17, 4/30/82.
(k) National Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards; Recommended MaximumContaminant Level; USEPA 40 CFR 141.
(1) Proposed Maximum Contaminant Level; NIPDWS, Federal Register, Vol. 50,No. 219, 11/13/85.
ug/l - micrograms per literug/kg - micrograms per kilogram
(CL5141A/5)
F.2-44
TABLE F.2.22
COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY CRITERIA TOPTL DETECTION LIMITS FOR EPA METHOD 625: ACID AND BASE!NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC ANALYSES
Detection Limit Available WaterParameter (Water) Quality Criteria
ug/h ug/1
Acenaphthene 10 20(a);0.0028(b)Acenaphthyl ene 10 0.0028(b)Anthracene 10 0.0028(b)Benzidine 100 0.00012(c)Benzo(a)Anthracene 10 0.0028(b)Benzo (a) Pyrene 10 0.0028(b)Benzo(b)Fluoranthene 10 0.0028(b)Benzo(ghi)Peryleie 10 0.0028(b)Benzo(k)Fluoranthene 10 0.0028(b)Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane 10 No established levelBis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether 10 0.03(c)Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether 10 34.7(d)Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 10 No established level4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether 10 No established levelButyl Benzyl Phthalate 10 No established level2-Chloronaphthalene 10 0.0028(b)4-Chiorophenyl Phenyl Ether 10 No established levelChrys ene 10 0.0028(b)Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene 10 0.0028(b)1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10 40(c);620(e)1,3-Dichlorobenzene 10 40(c)1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10 40(c);750(f);750(g)3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 20 0.0103(c)Diethyl Phthalate 10 350,000(d)Dimethyl Phthalate 10 313,000(d)Di-n-Butyl Phthalate 10 34,000(d)2,4-Dinitrotoluene 10 0.11(c)2,6-Dinitrotoluene 10 No established levelDi-n-Octylphthalate 10 No established level1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 10 0.0422(c)Fl uoranthene 10 42(d)Fl uorene 10 0.0028(b)Hexachlorobenzene 10 0.00072(c)Hexachlorobutadiene 10 0.447(c)Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 10 206(d);1.0(a)Hexachl oroethane 10 1.9(c)Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene 10 0.0028(b)Isophorone 10 5,200(d)Naphthal ene 10 No established levelNi trobenzene 10 19,800(d);30,000(a)N-Nitrosodimethylamine 10 0.0014(c)N-Nitrosodi-n-Propylamine 10 No established level
Table continued on next page;Legend appears on next page.
(C L5141 A/5)
F.2-45
TABLE F.2.22 (Continued)
COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY CRITERIA TOPTL DETECTION LIMITS FOR EPA METHOD 625: ACID AND BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE PRIORITY POLLUTANT ORGANIC ANALYSES
Detection Limit Available WaterParameter (Water) Quality Criteria
ug/l ug/l
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 10 4.9(c)Phenanthrene 10 0.0028(b)Pyrene 10 0.0028(b)1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10 No established level2-Chlorophenol 10 0.1(a)2,4-Dichlorophenol 10 3,090(d);0.3(a)2,4-Dimethylphenol 10 400(a)4,6-Dinitro-2-Cresol 50 No established level2,4-Dinitrophenol 50 70(d)2-Nitrophenol 10 No established level4-Nitrophenol 50 No established level4-Chloro-3-Cresol 10 No established levelPentachlorophenol 50 1,010(d);30(a);220(e)Phenol 10 3,500(d);300(a)2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 10 1.2(c)
Legend
(a) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria based upon organoleptic data; Federal;Register, Vol. 45, No. 231, 11/28/80.
(b) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbonscorresponding to an incremental increase in lifetime cancer risk of 10-6;Federal Register, Vol. 45, No. 231, 11/28/80.
(c) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria corresponding to an incrementalincrease in lifetime cancer risk of 10-6, Federal Register, Vol. 45, No.231, 11/28/80.
(d) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria based upon human health effects;Federal Register, Vol. 45, No. 231, 11/28/80.
(e) Proposed Recommended Maximum Contaminant Level; NIPDWS, Federal Register,Vol. 50, No. 219, 11/13/85.
(f) National Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards; Recommended MaximumContaminant Level; USEPA 40 CFR 141.
(g) Proposed Maximum Contaminant Level; NIPDWS, Federal Register, Vol. 50,No. 219, 11/13/85.
ug/l - micrograms per liter
(CL5141A/5)
F. 2-46
TABLE F.2.23
COMPARISON OF WATER QUALITY CRITERIA TO
PTL ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES AND DETECTION LIMITS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS,
CO140M ANIONS. TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS A10 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON ANALYSES
PTL DetectionAnalytical Procedures Limits AvailabLe Water
Parameter Water Soil Water SoiL QuaLity Criteria
mg/L mg/kg m/LPriority PoLlutant
Metals
Beryllium EPA 210.1 SW 7090 0.05 2.5 3.7X10-6 (a)
Cadmium EPA 213.1 SW 7130 0.005 0.5 0.01(b);0.01(f,i);0.005(h)
Chromium EPA 218.1 SW 7190 0.02 1.0 170(c);0.O5(d,f,i);O.12(h)
Copper EPA 220.1 SW 7210 0.02 1.0 1.O(e);1.0(g);1.3(h);O.05((i)
Nickel EPA 249.1 SW 7520 0.01 2.0 0.0134(b)
Lead EPA 239.1 SW 7420 0.02 1.0 0.05(b,f,i);0.02(h)
Zinc EPA 289.1 SW 7950 0.02 0.5 5.0(e,g);1.0(i)
Arsenic EPA 206.2 SW 7060 0.01 0.5 2.2X10-6(a);0.05(f,h,i)
Silver EPA 272.1 SW 7760 0.01 0.5 0.05(bf)
Antimor EPA 204.1 SW 7040 0.10 10.0 0.146(b)
Selenium EPA 270.2 SW 7740 0.01 0.5 0.01(bf,i);0.045(h)
ThaLLium EPA 279.1 SW 7840 0.01 5.0 0.013(b)Mercury EPA 245.1 SW 7470 0.001 0.10 1.44X10"4(b);0.002(f);0.003(h)
Common AnionsChloride SM 407A NA 1.0 NA 250(g);100(i)
Flouride EPA 340.1 NA 0.1 NA 2.0(f)
Bromide SN Part406 NA 0.1 NA None
Nitrate EPA 352.1 NA 0.1 NA 10(f,h);1.0(i)
Nitrite SM 419 NA 0.01 NA 1.0(h)
Phosphate EPA 365.2 NA 0.1 NA 0.1(i)
SuLfate EPA 375.4 NA 1.0 NA 250(g,i)
Total Dissolved
Solids EPA 160.1 NA 2.0 NA 500(g)
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons EPA 418.1 EPA 418.1 0.5 10.0 None
Legend(a) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria corresponding to an incremental increase in Lifetime
cancer risk of 10-6; Federal Register, Vol. 45, No. 231, 11/28/80.
(b) EPA Ambient Water Quality based upon human health effects; Federal Register, Vol. 45, No.
231, 11/28/80.
(c) Same as (b) for Chromium 11.
(d) Same as (b) for Chromium IV.
(e) EPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria based upon organoteptic data; Federal register, Vol.
45, No. 231, 11/28/80.
(f) National Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards: Maximum Contaminant Level; USEPA
40 CFR 141.
Legend continued on next page.
(CL5141A/5)
F. 2-47
TABLE F.2.23 (Continued)
COMPARISON OF WATER OUALITY CRITERIA TO
PTL ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES AND DETECTION LIMITS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS.
COM4ON ANIONS, TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AND TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON ANALYSES
(g) National Secondary Drinking Water Standards; USEPA 40CFR143.(h) Proposed Recommended Maximum Contaninant Level; Federal Register, Vol.
50, No. 219, 11/13/85.
(i) North Dakota Water Quality Standards; North Dakota Department of Health
Rule 33-16-02, Section 06.
mg/L - miLligrams per Litermg/kg - miLligrams per kilogram
(CL5141A/5)
F.2-48
TABLE F.2.24
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSES
SURROGATE RECOVERY DATA FOR PTL JOB NO. 86GW3538 WATER SAMPLES
Percent Recovery Results For SurrogateSpike Compounds
Suurogate MethodCompounds Blank 023 024 025 026 026
2-Fluorophenol 132 111 109 91 117 95
D5-phenol 71 67 70 69 67 57
D5-Nitrobenzene 39 39 41 36 29 34
2-Fluorobiphenyl 50 47 52 41 36 41
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 219 230 171 310 164 151
(CL5056B/28)
F. 2-49
TABLE F.2.25
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSES
SURROGATE RECOVERY DATA FOR PTL JOB NO. 86GW3506 WATER SAMPLES
Percent Recovery Results For SurrogateSpike Compounds
SurrogateCompounds 004 005 006 012 015
2-Fluorophenol 70 99 86 76 78
D5-Phenol 69 71 61 49 49
D5-Nitrobenzene 53 42 35 35 26
2-Fluorobiphenyl 86 78 40 34 31
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 100 161 212 174 173
(CL5056B/30)
F.2-50
TABLE F.2.26
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC ANALYSES
SURROGATE RECOVERY DATA FOR PTL JOB NO. 86GW3523 WATER SAMPLES
Percent Recovery Results For Surrogate Spike CompoundsSurrogate MethodCompounds Blank 001 003 007 013 014 017 018 019 020 021
2-Fluorophenol 44 119 118 125 176 86 38 35 80 111 76
D5-Phenol 37 67 67 71 150 52 22 26 44 74 45
D5-Nitrobenzene 25 48 42 48 41 44 36 46 30 36 49
2-Fluorobiphenyl 45 55 53 59 55 51 43 56 38 45 60
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 161 213 192 190 177 230 198 144 218 158 217
(CL5056B/31)
F.2- 51
w > 0 tD ChI Ch -q -4 0.. 0% a-. m to0 G C C 0% 0% 00 - CO % ON
S-
0) cc: (%J O C Cp) 0o 0> CoJ Co0
vsn i -. ~ n ini ~
3c V) I-L O LO L O LOi l C
(A n a,
o-
C 9 I! . 3
(ni 0D0U 0LLI >- co-r D 4 4C
lfie
c~co
0 <Z:; c n
t-
mf U)) rQ vI 4J -v co
m.4f ' Co) m J Co 0 - C . m m I
~~~C 0 0 0 0 0 0D 0. 0 0.U) UL ** Z
~~C14
LLJ3 s-s 1
+3 S- C Co c ( c S
0o L..3) (\J 0J CJ- ( (
F. 2- 52
0
W-E
-I
CC
Ca w 93co LA
-- CDO
ccJX w
Cl))
4a
W-~ 4Et
0o CA'=/ C7 0 ) w
C..) ..0 a
- LsW
w u~ a4'0- 5- (v w ~ j
CV w.+=
WJ0 CCL * = wcc w r-j u - 1
S-* > C 0 a)0 .
.- O. 0) 4- 0 - "a)
r)--. W 0. 0- 41 > eIV 4-) m- 0)0
s0 Ce v f 4-314J r- NS->~ ~ U000-
cm u . -%
ca.0 0) ap-u-a *- ~0- 4) CU
a go:4.it0 0
F .2-53
4-J
a) _ 0.I rO 4d, C) Go 0 -4 -d toj (n co 0)r CW-4 &n co -W4 - -4 -4 c m C
CA ~0 0o C C 0 0 0 D 0 C 4 >
a--u
m) x
ca t
V) a- <49I 9 4C~J . 4 .L - co W* .
U) Ioc)a
(nLA U-J
(, - _tW -cm 0 Co m C m C0m m C
(A
w C 0 0 0 0 000 O
0.1
00
LL 4-) 4
I- i-
0-06
Li)n
40 06 - 1) > WuLS- 0 0 06 40 0- 0 0rd0 0
Q) a 4) ea0 S-0
-ji f- C ) ) I
F. 2-54
-4
0
CCLn CD Cl
coi CD0
LLL- --
LL CL
~ 0- a)
)(L4J -04-
U.1U
C0 to0 0'
04- -LLII I)~ w wU
Xe Ox a S)
-~r C>) UI3 to 0LO)
gopC/
O a)--"'- ~ 3
F .2-55
S..
cn V.- co 0 tO -4 -d inU) -% - -e C) -o m I- 0
(A AU a.* . . . V! 0-w 41) 40 0 0 D 0 D 0 D Co 0 o 0
0.0<J CL 0 D 0 o )
on 41S.
-9
Ln1 C". Cl cc e.c0j 0- 0o 0 0 ini
o- -i C, - C%
0- C)
LUU
ca x
i010. cm a. s .o . . . 0. 4
tv >)~ 0 1-. d V ~ u ) > w )-J 06tv atOS
CO- ~ ) Ll
F. 2-56
C -
0i
c LU 0
gy,
co L"
>- a
)
4J* o
w ~ 0J cc -
S- w~
4-1-
.9- 0 3-c0 4-J >-
0: ~ ~ ~ cc N 4J4 4-c LW.9 o
'D-a
414- cccc elL
4) IM I C-.)9 cm a- 5EW*0 C'2w.0
F. 2-57
4.)
S--
uo- -n 0)
-S.
.he
V)) 04 a) 0 ~
U) to 4J. V~
co C>
0-
U) ) 0 04C
>- cc w)0
~04- U) o
U) x
~~S w-C%CL) w m w00
4.- 0r 4 a
on co 3t % 0
5- ~0 LO a -j(
I- -
C V- S vU
~~ 0 to~ Eo04- LO I-S >c .0*
m. CD -'1 1- cn. =S W 41/) C> CD 40. 0W 'V4JUL
Lr- >- en)
a) cu-0 000 to 4
04 4) i-O
m 0 v Cm 0 O S- S - )0. oLS-) 4--- +3 4- )4- cm . r- -.-. w. 3~ U) ~ .~0 CJ- 02'
F. 2- 58
4-
Q0 w
u 4-
V) ~ U Li-adL
(n 0D 02 0 CD) C>)-.4-J -WJ CD 0> 0 Co wco4 0. C- . -C; 0.uS
U.)
on CD 4cwc! ) 3mC <a
cl zi- f 4- 4 4- -1C
-0 0 V.00 r-
C C) co0
XLJ~ rm.) If 0004
0i LJO0 Lni CD) -4 '' 'x
Co 4-) '
m CD C)
0 - 41 Co 0 o WS 0 IfO r-_ 0 If) 0 l 4- C 3
5-) m 0i to co o
U) C C V
Cal.- w - I= .4 be0.CL %- a,.. - )
0O Li w wU)I S->>1 cI CII C pC - > - C w =0
cina~~0 CD 40 4 o 0 co C o'
4- -0 00 r 0w4. 'o 4-0) CM C- tM=-Vc)
mi o4. 0 EO S.- -*- 1=. LoS-- U) of 4-, +J 4-) .4-)0 to - 0t- =- C') S--4 ' C3 0 0 CI,-C. u 0- co m V. . i R-4ce-
F.2-59
41
u)> 0 h 0 0 C C
Wa, - a
S -
0 0
to ~ U C
CA ~ co cn C"! U) V)
I= V)
cn in x . -
V) ~ ~ U aa c 0>0.. J . ui V) Co0 ) 4 ca -E
0 W C q L o 0 0.0>
V) I- 0C C'! C ) W0
C/) 0 0o w 0LiOw. cne I )
C! - C )
m# In3 0000
-. Wito 0l
u Ki a- f- C0= I ~__j V) C!-
-cm0.C' ' *0 ~ ).
Li! V-- 0 0O CD co C> to C'.
0 4
r- = x .' wO
4- '-m V-
evI S-4 C (I C
u 4- 4.) a, C n . 34- Cn (V) 0 to IS-.IOC/) C 0to to 0 VO
0)- w, - w" 0 0.
o~~~t o- 0 4) r
S- (D 4.3 cc 0 1-
CC S- ca 0 WUa)4m~~~, o) s-S- - )r. v m
o -~ ) 4J 4--) 0 (n m*-* u.
m r- S-4)a- C mo-C L. L.L C") (A ! C- EC 0 *
F.2-60
TABLE F.2.33
LABORATORY RESULTS FOR REPLICATE SAMPLES
Sample IdentifiersHART Identifier - MAFB,DW-4,GW-1,HART014* MAFB,DW-5,GW-1,HART021PTL Identifier - SN014 SN021
mg/l mg/lParameter
Priority Pollutant MetalsBeryllium ND NDCadmium ND NDChromium ND NDCopper ND NDNickel ND NDLead ND NDZinc 0.07 0.03Arsenic ND NDSilver ND NDAntimony ND NDSelenium ND NDThallium ND NDMercury ND ND
Common AnionsChloride 30 35Fluoride 0.99 0.87Bromide ND 0.90Nitrate ND 0.13Nitrite ND NDPhosphate 0.18 0.14Sulfate 4500 4800
Total Dissolved Solids 5036 4848Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons NYAromatic Volatile Organics NO- ND?Halogenatic Volatile Organics NDI NDI
Acid Extractable PriorityPollutant Organics ND1 NDI
Base/Neutral Extractable PriorityPollutant Organics NDI NDI
LEGEND
* Indicates actual Sample Identifier
ND Not Detected1 Analysis in ug/l
Table continued on next page.
(CL5022B/4)
' ' ' I IA
F.2-61
TABLE F.2.33 (CONTINUED)
LABORATORY RESULTS FOR REPLICATE SAMPLES
Sample IdentifiersHART Identifier - MAFB,SWA,S1,HART023* MAFB,SWE,S1,HART027PTL Identifier - SN023 SN027
mg/l mg/lParameter
Priority Pollutant MetalsBeryllium ND NDCadmium ND NDChromium ND NDCopper 0.03 0.04Nickel 0.016 0.014Lead ND NDZinc 0.03 0.22Arsenic ND NDSilver ND NDAntimony ND NDSelenium ND NDThallium ND NDMercury ND ND
Common AnionsChloride 400 380Fluoride 1.5 1.5Bromide 2.8 6.8Nitrate 0.25 1.05Nitrite 0.08 0.10Phosphate 0.10 0.20Sulfate 2400 2400
Total Dissolved Solids 4460 4761Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons NY NDAromatic Volatile Organics ND1 NDI
Halogenated Volatile Organics ND1 NDI
Acid Extractable PriorityPollutant Organics ND1 NDI
Base/Neutral Extractable PriorityPollutant Organics NDI ND1
LEGEND:
* Indicates actual sample identification
ND Not DetectedI Analysis in ug/l
Table continued on next page.
(CL5022B/4)
F.2-62
TABLE F.2.33 (CONTINUED)
LABORATORY RESULTS FOR REPLICATE SAMPLES
Sample IdentifiersHART Identifier - MAFB,SW-9,GW-1,HARTO09* MAFB,SW-9,GW-2,HART00PTL Identifier - SNO09 SNOIO
ug/ ug/lParameter
Aromatic Volatile Organics ND NDHalogenated Volatile Organics
1,2 dichloroethane NO 11 ug/l1,1,1-trichloroethane ND 11 ug/lbromodichloromethane ND 3 ug/ltrichloroethane ND 4 ug/ltetrachloroethane ND 2 ug/lAll Others ND ND
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 0.51 NDI
Lead ND1 ND1
Sample IdentifiersHART Identifier - MAFB,Tb-2,SS-5,HART010* MAFB,Tb-2,SS-5,HART011PTL Identifier - HART010 HART011
mg/l mg/lParameter
Priority Pollutant MetalsBeryllium ND NDCadmium ND 1.73Chromium 1.39 1.46Copper 12.8 12.70Nickel 10.3 11.50Lead 5.03 3.93Zinc 60.01 59.10Arsenic ND NDSilver 1.43 0.58Antimony ND NDSelenium ND NDThallium ND NDMercury 0.10 0.16
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ND ND
LEGEND:
* Indicates actual sample identifier.
ND Not detectedI Analysis in mg/l
(CLS022B/4)