Action: Define an In-process review (IPR)
Condition: You are a recruiting leader
with the requirement to understand the
components of an IPR. You have access
to USAREC Manual (UM) 3-02, Field
Manual (FM) 6-22, and access to the
internal production outlook Leader Zone.
Standard: Define a daily IPR used
effectively, while incorporating the use
of Leader Zone as a validation tool, and
maintaining a high focus on
performance standards and operational
effectiveness.
An IPR is:
• A Quality Control Checkpoint
• Focused on performance standards
• Formal w/Informal Methods
› Outline
Personnel
Present Mission
Projections
Processing
Prospecting
Recruiting Operations Plan
Future Soldier Training Program
Supports Leadership Imperative
Goal
› Encouragement
› Enable
› Direction
Communication
Systematic Review
Modification› Behavior
› Performance
Scheduled Regularly
Centered on Recruiting Functions
Conducted› Telephone
› Face-to-Face
Mutual Trust
Review› MAP
› Leads and Prospecting Analysis (LPA)
› Processing Data
› Future Soldier Roster
Discussion Points
Uniformity› Prepared
› Develops Patterns of Thinking
› Fosters Successful Habits
Personnel
› Review Strength Issues Are there any health or other Soldier Family issues?
How many recruiters are in the foxhole to accomplish
the plan?
Has all monthly counseling been completed?
How can we increase efficiency?
How can we increase their effectiveness?
› Administration Topics
Soldier Development
Pay, Awards, NCOER’s
Mission Posture› What is this PL’s mission?
› Where does the unit stand on the mission?
› When will the unit make the mission?
› Are there any obstacles or potential obstacles that could affect the mission?
› What courses of action (COAs) have been developed to overcome these obstacles?
› Who is shipping to the training base this week or this month?
› Are there any issues that may prevent their shipping?
› Are there any pending Future Soldier losses?
Projections› Who is projected and when are they scheduled
to enlist?› Is the application complete?› Has the packet been forwarded within
prescribed time lines?› Does the applicant require special testing
(medical or administrative)?› What might keep this applicant from enlisting or
commissioning?› Did the station commander interview (“hot
seat”) this person?› Which applicant is closest to enlisting?› Which applicant is next closest?
Processing
› Who is testing and when?
› How many testers should there be?
› What is the expected processing time line for these testers?
› What COA has been developed to ensure
success in this area?
Prospecting
› Based on yesterday’s prospecting plan,
what was supposed to happen?
› What results were expected and what was achieved?
› Did results meet or exceed MAP goals?
› What is the COA to correct any shortfalls?
› What is your plan to correct any shortfalls?
ROP
› What needs to change?
› How are we going to do it?
› Do we need additional resources to execute the new COA?
› What are we going to measure?
› What will be our early warning indicators?
› Who will be responsible for this step?
Future Soldiers› Are there any Future Soldiers shipping this month and who
are they?
› When are they shipping?
› Have recruiters completed their quality assurance checks?
› Have required documents been placed in the ship packets?
› Have all Future Soldiers received an initial orientation?
› Do all Future Soldiers have an Army Knowledge Online account?
› How many referrals did Future Soldiers deliver last week?
› What Future Soldier training or event is planned in this PL?
Mission Posture
Processing
Prospecting
Prospecting
Prospecting
Questions?