Download pdf - iifm bhopal

8/18/2019 iifm bhopal

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/iifm-bhopal 1/41

National Institutional Ranking Framework

RANKING PARAMETERS

Outreach

& Inclusivity

Perception

Research, Professional

Practice & Collaborative

Performance

Teaching, Learning

& Resources

India Rankings 2016

Graduation

Outcomes

Engineering | Management | Pharmacy | Universities





Content

Preface i

1. Background 1

2. NIRF Parameters for Ranking of Institutions 2

3. Metric to Compute Ranking Scores 2

4. Participation: A Matter of Choice 3

5. Methodology 4

5.1. Source of Data: Individual Institutions 4

5.2. Data Collection and Data Capturing 45.2.1 Online Data Capturing Platform

5.2.2 Data Submission Utility

5.2.3 Publications, Citations and Collaboration: Web of Science, Scopus and Indian Citation Index

5.2.4 Perception

5.3. Data Mining and Data Verification 6

5.4. Interpretation and Minor Deviations 6

5.5. Ranking Threshold 7

6. Analysis of Ranking Results 7

6.1. Engineering (Category A-Research & Teaching) 7

6.2. Management (Category A-Research & Teaching) 8

6.3. Pharmacy (Category A-Research & Teaching) 9

6.4. Universities 9

7. Computation of Scores and Rankings: Top 25 in Each Category 10

7.1. India Rankings 2016: Engineering Category “A” 10

7.2. India Rankings 2016: Management Category “A” 11

7.3. India Rankings 2016: Pharmacy Category “A” 12

7.4. India Rankings 2016: Universities Category “A” 13

8. Top Ten Institutions in Each Category 14

8.1. Engineering (Category A-Research & Teaching) 14

8.2. Management (Category A-Research & Teaching) 20

8.3. Pharmacy (Category A-Research & Teaching) 25

8.4. Universities 30

9. Collaborators 35



Preface

Lessons from the First National Rankings Effort

This has been a huge learning opportunity for those of us who have been involved in this effort.

Receiving such a large response from educational institutions was the first surprise. That the institutions

were so keen to position themselves amongst their peers was a very pleasant thing to learn. This speaks

volumes for the institutional aspirations to move towards quality, and augurs well for the future evolution of

higher educational institutions.

In this respect, it is relevant to mention that response from universities, engineering, management and

pharmacy institutions was very enthusiastic, even overwhelming and therefore, particularly gratifying. The

response was uniformly spread across Government-funded and privately-funded or self-financing

institutions. This makes the ranking effort truly representative and worthwhile.

However, despite wide publicity, the response from the Architecture and general degree colleges fell short of

being truly representative. Hence, for this year, it was decided not to rank institutions belonging to these two

categories. We offer apologies to institutions in these two categories that took the trouble to register and

populate the data; but it became clear to us that there were significant pockets of relative vacuum. In the

absence of representative participation, the ranking exercise here would have become meaningless.

On the down side, the associated learning has been that educational institutions have to be more careful

about the data. Many institutions failed to put their best foot forward, when it came to supplyingquality data

The point being emphasized here is “quality ”. Some of the institutions were definitely casual in supplying the

data sought. Reliability of an exercise like this depends entirely on the reliability of the data. This is clearly an

area in which further work is needed. Institutions need to appreciate that supplying honest and reliable data

is important for their own image of how they want to be seen by their pupils and the World at large.

In fact almost a major fraction of the ranking effort has gone into improving data quality. A large number of

our volunteers were deeply involved here. We used an outliers based approach for the detection of bad data

points, contacted the concerned institutions repeatedly to examine the suspected figures and to supply the

corrected values instead. While some amount of automation was used for the task, significant humaninterventions were needed for which our officials, volunteers and staff (both at NBA and INFLIBNET) spent

many sleepless nights. We are grateful to many professional volunteers involved in the exercise, who gave

their time for this task selflessly.

In fact, the major learning from this exercise for the future is to give deeper attention to this problem. Going

forward, we need to find ways for many of the relevant data to be populated directly from a few independent

India Rankings 2016 I



sources. There is need for organizing a major effort to create such sources for independent data, as well as for

doing away with parameters for which such sources cannot be reliably identified.

To put this in a better perspective, the data on research publications and citations was taken directly from

resources published by Elsevier (Scopus), Thomson Reuters (Web of Science) and the Indian Citation Index

We had little problems with data taken from these sources.

We have taken every care to be objectively neutral in our work here. However, it became necessary at times to

effect data corrections, where common reasoning dictated that there was an obvious error due to

carelessness. However, the number of such interventions is very small and in all cases had little possibility to

impact the over-all ranking process.

In spite of taking all care, we are aware of the many pitfalls and deficiencies of a first attempt, and the possible

imperfections in the results. We seek indulgence of all stakeholders and hope to work with them in

developing the future versions of this national exercise.

Surendra Prasad

Chairman, NBA

India Rankings 2016 ii



1. Background

The process of framing National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) began on October 9, 2014 with constitution

of a 16-member core committee under the chairmanship of Secretary (HE), Ministry of Human Resource

Development. The terms of reference of the Committee were to suggest a reliable, transparent and authentic National

Framework for performance measurement and ranking of institutions for higher education and to recommendinstitutional mechanisms, processes and timelines for implementation of the National Institutional Ranking

Framework. The framework was given a final shape subsequent to intense discussions and deliberations during a

series of meetings of the Committee and exchanges with peers and stakeholders through many online discussions.

The National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) for engineering and management categories was unveiled byth

Smt. Smriti Irani, Honourable Minister for Human Resource Development on 29 September, 2015. Soon after, the

NIRF for ranking of the pharmacy and architecture institutions as well as for colleges & universities were released. The

NIRF envisaged separate rankings for different categories of institutions in their own respective peer groups. Further

within each discipline, there was provision for separate ranking in two categories – institutions that are engaged in

research and teaching (Category A), and those engaged mainly in teaching (Category B).

The final framework identified nearly 22 parameters in five major heads, several of them are similar to those employed

globally such as excellence in teaching, learning and research. However, there are a few which are India-centric

reflecting aspirations of the rising numbers of young people of a vast nation. Country-specific parameters relevant to

the Indian situation include regional and international diversity, outreach, gender equity and inclusion of

disadvantaged sections of society.

“The Ranking framework will empower a larger number of Indian

Institutions to participate in the global rankings, and create a significant

impact internationally too. I see this as a sensitization process and an

empowering tool, and not a tool for protection.”

Smriti Zubin Irani, HRD Minister

“I don't see this becoming encompassing and exhaustive in next two years,but a beginning to that end. Our framework is a moderated version of QS

and is self-reporting. Though all central universities will be part of it, I hope

good institutions from private as well as other sectors will aspire to be part of

rankings,”

Vinay Sheel Oberoi, Secretary (HE), MHRD

India Rankings 2016 1



2. NIRF Parameters for Ranking of Institutions

The NIRF provides for ranking of institutions under five broad generic parameters, namely: i) Teaching, Learning and

Resources; ii) Research, Consulting and Collaborative Performance; iii) Graduation Outcome; iv) Outreach and

Inclusivity; and v) Perception.

3. Metrics to Compute Ranking Scores

The discipline-specific ranking frameworks for all the six categories of institutions mentioned above are available on

the NIRF Web site (https://www.nirfindia.org/). These documents identify the relevant data required to suitably

The NIRF has been drafted to provide an Indian context to

educational aspirations and needs”.

Smriti Zubin Irani, HRD Minister

Teaching, Learning and Resources (TLR)

Outreach and Inclusivity (OI)

Faculty Student Ratio - Permanent Faculty (FSR)

Faculty Student Ratio - Visiting Faculty (FSR)

Metric for Faculty with Ph.D. and Experience (FQE)

Metric for Library, Studio & Laboratory Facilities (LL)

Metric for Sports and Extra Curricular Facilities (SEC)

Metric for Teaching and Innovation (TI)

Outreach Footprint (Continuing Education, Services)

(CES)

Percentage of Students from Other States / Countries (RD)

Percentage of Women Students and Faculty (WS)

Percentage of Economically and Socially Disadvantaged

Students (ESDS)

Facilities for Physically Challenged / Differently Abled

Persons

Research Productivity, Impact and IPR (RPII)

Graduation Outcome (GO)

Perception (PR)

Combined Metric for Publications (PU)

Combined Metric for Citations (CI)

Intellectual Property Right and Patents (IPR)

% of Collaborative Publications and Patents (CP)

Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice (FPPP)

Performance in University Examinations (PUE)

Performance in Public Examinations (PPE)

Performance in Placement, Higher Studies and

Entrepreneurship (PHE)

Mean Salary for Employment (MS)

Process for Peer Rating in Category (PR) and

Applications to Seat Ratio (SR)




measure the performance score under-each sub-head mentioned above and propose a suitable metric to compute a

score for the sub-head. The sub-head scores are then added to obtain scores for each individual parameter. The overal

score is computed based on the weights allotted to different parameters.

Institutions desirous of participating in the ranking exercise using framework defined by the NIRF were invited to

register themselves on the NIRF Web portal and submit their online applications for ranking in one or more disciplines

along with relevant data in the given format by 31st December, 2015. The last date for submission of data was later

extended up to 15th January, 2016.

Discipline Numbers CFTIs Govt. Semi-Govt. Inst.

Total Cat. A Cat. B Cat. & CFU Inst. (Deemed, State, (Pvt. &

A & B 12 B Univ.) Deemed Pvt.)

Engineering 1438 314 1116 8 53 168 13 1204

Management 609 142 459 8 14 27 11 557

Pharmacy 454 173 275 6 -- 34 1 419

Architecture 28 10 17 1 1 4 4 19

College 803 - - - -- -- 744 59

University 233 - - - 46 -- 141 46

Region-wise Distribution of Institutions Registered for Ranking under NIRF

4. Participation: A Matter of Choice

Others

Discipline / Region Engineering Management Pharmacy University

North 252 150 84 86

South 737 257 194 58

East 126 35 28 23

West 301 162 145 50

North-east 22 5 3 16

Total 1438 609 454 233

“India needs national rankings and national data collection effort. We

want more universities from India to provide data, and we really

encourage data sharing.”

Phil Baty, THE Rankings




5. Methodology

5.1 Source of Data: Individual Institutions

In the absence of a reliable and comprehensive database that could supply all relevant data required for computing the

scores for ranking, it became imperative that individual institutions desirous of participating in the ranking exercise

be asked to provide most of the data. As such, institutions desirous of getting themselves ranked under the NIRF

framework were invited to register themselves on the NIRF portal and submit data in the prescribed format. Given

that publication and citations data pertaining to research output is available in databases published regularly by

Elsevier (Scopus), Thomson Reuters (Web of Science) and the Indian Citation Index, it was stipulated to use

information available there.

5.2 Data Collection and Data Capturing

Institutions who registered themselves for ranking under one or more disciplines were asked to submit the requisite

data in the prescribed format either directly on the web-based online data capturing platform or using a Data

Submission Utility.

5.2.1 Online Data Capturing Platform

Institutions registered on NIRF site could enter the data online directly into the web-based Data Capturing Platform

developed for this purpose on NIRF portal for one or more disciplines.

5.2.2 Data Submission Utility

This Data Submission Utility was developed to facilitate off-line collection of data required for parameters and sub-

parameters developed by NIRF. It was designed using an Excel Workbook that consisted of thirteen worksheets

including: Read-me-first, Registration Details, Faculty Summary, Faculty Details, IPR, Sponsored Research,

Consultancy, Education Programme, Students, Public Examinations, Student Events and Facilities for the PhysicallyChallenged. Separate Data Submission Utility was designed for each of the six disciplines.

The Data Submission Utility provided for generation of XML file for all twelve worksheets (except Read-me-first) once

all worksheets are duly filled-in and validated. This XML file could then be uploaded onto the NIRF website.

5.2.3 Publications, Citations and Collaboration: Web of Science, Scopus and Indian Citation Index

Three citation databases were used as sources for retrieving the number of publications, citations and collaborative

publications for institutions who registered themselves for ranking in one or more disciplines. These citation

databases are: i) Science Citation Index (SCI), Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) and the Arts and Humanities

Citation Index (A&HCI) hosted on the Web of Science platform; ii) Scopus; and iii) Indian Citation Index. Google

Scholar, initially proposed as one of the sources for publications and citations, was dropped as a resource since it does

not facilitate searching of publications and citations by names of institutions. These three sources of publications and

citations cover almost all disciplines.

These three databases were searched to determine the quantitative productivity of all 3,565 institution who

registered themselves for ranking in terms of research articles published by them and citations received by these

publications in a span of three years, i.e. 2012, 2013 and 2014.




5.2.3.1 Search Strategy for Retrieving Research Publications, Citations and Collaborations from WoS, Scopus and ICI

All permutations, combinations and changes in the names of institutions were used while searching for articles

published by faculty and researchers in the three databases mentioned above. It was realized that although Scopus

had affiliation IDs, at times multiple IDs for the same institution, it did so only for a limited number of Indian

institutions. As such, search strategy had to be defined and used for retrieving publications, citations and

collaboration data from all the three citation indices. Since searches were conducted using names of institutions,

articles that did not have institutional affiliations of their faculty and researchers could not be retrieved.

Several universities host other research institutions within their physical premises. Care was taken to ensure that

credit for a publication and citations is given to the correct institution. Manual checking of retrieved data was done in

cases i) where two institutions with same (or similar) names share the same physical premise; ii) institutions having

the same name in the same city, for example Government Colleges, DAV Colleges, etc.

Universities Handbook 2014 (Association of Indian universities, 2014) and web sites of institutions were used to find

changes in the names of institutions. Many variations in names of universities, their physical locations and their

spellings were discovered during the searches in all three databases. The task was challenging. The NIRF has taken

every care to be accurate on this count, and our relevant academic partners, Elsevier (Scopus), Thomson Reuters (Web

of Science) and Indian Citation Index have validated the results on a sample basis.

5.2.3.2 Restricting Retrieval of Articles to a Given Discipline

Subject-wise and discipline-wise search was not done in cases of universities and degree colleges applying for ranking

under universities and colleges respectively. Likewise, subject-wise or discipline-wise search was not made for

institutions largely devoted to subjects under which ranking is sought, e.g., the IITs and other engineering institutions,

colleges of pharmacy (for pharmacy) and IIMs (for management). However, subject category-wise search was made in

the following cases:

i) Universities applying for ranking under other subject categories. Example: Jamia Milia Islamia has also

applied for more than one disciplines.

ii) Institutions applying for ranking in multiple categories. Example: IIITM, Gwalior has applied separately for

ranking in Management and Engineering disciplines.

5.2.4 Perception

Perception is a very important parameter for getting the feedback of the stakeholders. In order to get a calibrated view,

it was decided to elicit feedback separately from both: carefully identified peer groups as well as from general public

including students, parents and employers who wished to provide such a feedback. For the latter, a series of publicadvertisements were issued and the public response was received on the NIRF portal, specially created for this

purpose. The response was extremely enthusiastic. We received nearly 1,50,000 votes from nearly 60,000 individuals.

Many of these were for Category B institutions.

The peer groups were selected from a list of eminent and accomplished individuals from academia, industry, R&D

institutions and other Government organizations. Special letters were sent to them inviting them to provide feedback

directly on the NIRF portal. We received votes for about 500 institutions from the peer groups.




For a first time effort, the response indicates a fair level of interest and participation from both general public and

peers.

5.3 Data Mining and Data Verification

Issues and pit-falls in the process of data collection, verification, authentication and interpretation were addressed by

the Implementation Core Committee (ICC) set-up by the MHRD to oversee the implementation of ranking work for the

year 2015. Besides, committees consisting of experts from adademic institutions were constituted to examine thedata submitted by institutions under each of the five broad generic parameters, for each discipline. These Committees

examined the data on various parameters minutely and identified outliers and anomalies for further scrutiny. Such

institutions were contacted telephonically and via e-mail to confirm or correct the Data. Nodal officers from some of

the institutions were also called in person to interact with the members of the committee and verify their data. For

increased transparency, the final data as it relates to each institution is also being put up on our website. A polite

advisory has also been made to each institution to upload this data on their own website for dissemination to the

public.

5.4 Interpretation and Minor Deviations

Based on issues and pit-falls brought to the notice of Implementation Core Committee (ICC) related to data collection,

verification, authentication and interpretation, the following interpretation and minor deviations were introduced in

the metric and parameters defined in the NIRF:

i) Indian Citation Index was used as source of publications and citations in place of Google Scholar for all

disciplines, since the latter does not support searching of publications by names of institutions.

ii) Collaborative publications were taken only from Web of Science and Scopus. As such, their wieghtages were

correpondingly increased.

iii) Publications provided by individual institutions were not considered because of incomplete, wrong and

misleading bibiographic information supplied by several individual institutions. In any case, we decided to

follow the best international practices in this domain.

iv) Top positions in inter-college and extra curricular events were considered irrespective of whether the events

were at the state and national level or not. This is because many institutions did not care to distinguish

between the various levels of activities.

“A ranking system is needed to capture all facets of education,

teaching, learning and facilities for overall development of

students.”

Anil D Sahasrabudhe, Chairman, AICTE




v) Average publications and patents per faculty for an institute were calculated based on the number of faculty

either required (through a notional FSR of 1:15) or actual faculty numbers in position, which ever was larger,

for calculating metric for publications.

vi) Only university examinations were considered and weightage for public examination was transferred to the

former.

vii) In continuing education and services, training programmes / workshops that were imparted for 6 to 30 dayswith number of participants ranging from 10 to 50 were considered.

5.5 Ranking Thresholds

The following sets of institutions were not considered for ranking:

i) Institutions applicant for ranking in Engineering - Category A whose total undergraduate student approved

intake was less than 200;

ii) Institutions applicant for ranking in Engineering - Category B whose total undergraduate student approved

intake was less than 350;

iii) Architecture Institutions – because of a very limited response from this category of institutions;

iv) General degree colleges – since very few of those that applied were above a basic threshold of performance on

many of the important parameters; and

v) Open universities.

6.1. Engineering (Category A- Research & Teaching)

The IITs (old and new) lead the league tables for Engineering (Category A-Research & Teaching) occupying the first

eleven positions. Predictably, the first five IITs, established during 1950s and early 1960s, take the first five positions

led by IIT Madras the top slot with a weighted score of 89.42 followed by IIT Bombay, IIT Kharagpur, IIT Delhi and IIT

Kanpur with weighted score of 87.67, 83.91, 82.03 and 81.07 respectively. In addition to the five old IITs, five more IITs

secured distinction in terms of weighted score, viz., IIT Roorkee (rank 6; weighted score: 78.68), IIT Hyderabad (rank

7; weighted score: 77.23), IIT Gandhinager (rank 8; weighted score: 75.21), IIT Ropar (rank 9; weighted score: 74.89

and IIT Patna (rank 10; weighted score: 74.68). However, IIT Guwahati with a weighted score of 74.63 missed the

distinction marks by a whisker. Remaining 5 IITs are interspersed between ranks 14 and 26. It is encouraging to note

6. Analysis of Ranking Results

“In the early stages of its work, it became clear to the Core Committee that a

single ranking framework for such a complex scenario of institutions would be

counterproductive, and even meaningless. This led to the conclusion that a

ranking framework should be designed that enables an apple-to-apple

comparison,”

Surendra Prasad , Chairman, NBA & Member, Core Committee, NIRF




that 12 NITs find their places amongst first 50 institutions led by NIT, Tiruchirappalli at rank 12 and 10 NITs are

interspersed between ranks 51 to 92. The Vellore Institute of Technology (rank 13) and PSG College of Technology,

Coimbatore (rank 24) get the distinction of being two private institutions occupying top slots amongst the IITs and

NITs.

Rising Stars: IIT Hyderabad, IIT Gandhinagar, IIT Ropar, IIT Patna (rank 7 to 10), IIT Indore (rank 16), IIT Mandi (rank

20), IIT Jodhpur (rank 25) and IIT Bhubaneswar (rank 26), set-up in 2008-2009, can truly be considered as rising

stars since all these new IITs secured positions within the first thirty slots.

Generally institutions funded by the Central Government directly are heads and shoulders above the others, be they

privately-funded or State Government-funded institutions. While this is clearly on expected lines, it also brings out

the significant gap between these institutions and the others. Clearly there are deeper lessons to learn here. Having

said that, there are interesting new institutions, which are slowly but surely creeping into the top-slots. We should

certainly watch out for them in the years to come. It is also possible to argue that some of the parameters like funding

for library and laboratories, load the dice in their favour, and it would be interesting to see how some of these

institutions would perform on “outputs” and “outcomes” on a per Rupee investment scale.

6.2. Management (Category A – Research and Teaching)

Predictably IIMs hog the top slots amongst the management institutions. The first six ranks are occupied by IIMs led

by IIM Bangalore at 1st rank with a weighted score of 93.04, closely followed by IIM Ahmedabad (rank 2), IIM Calcutta

(rank 3) and IIM Lucknow (rank 4) with weighted scores of 89.92, 87.45 and 86.13 respectively. IIM Udaipur and IIM

Kozhikode are at 5 and 6 positions respectively with weighted score of 84.23 and 81.97 respectively. The remaining

seven IIMs are interspersed between ranks 10 and 28. International Management Institute, New Delhi, a private

institution is at rank 7 with a weighted score of 81.78.

In addition to top seven management institutions mentioned above, seven more management institutions secured

distinction in terms of weighted scores. These institutions are: Indian Institute of Forest Management (rank 8;weighted score: 81.01); Department of Mangement Studies, IIT Kanpur (rank 9; weighted score: 79.44); IIM Indore

(rank 10; weighted score: 78.63); Management Development Institute (rank 11;weighted score: 77.45); International

Management Institute, Kolkata (rank 12; weighted score: 77.17); Xavier Labour Relations Institute (XLRI) (rank 13;

weighted score: 75.30) and IIM Tiruchirappalli (rank 14; weighted score : 75.24).

Management Schools of IIT Kanpur (rank 9), Vellore Institute of Technology (rank 17) and Birla Institute of

Technology (rank 25) have also claimed top slots amongst the management institutions. Several private management

institutions also claim top slots in the ranking including: International Management Institute, New Delhi (rank 7),

International Management Institute, Kolkata (rank 12), Xavier Labor Relations Institutions (XLRI) (rank 13),

Thiagarajar School of Management (rank 15) and S. P. Jain Institute of Management and Research (rank 16).

Rising Stars: Indian Institute of Management, Udaipur (rank 5), International Management Institute, Kolkata (rank

12), Indian Institute of Management, Tiruchirappalli (rank 14), Indian Institute of Management, Raipur (rank 18),

Indian Institute of Management Rohtak (rank 19), Rajiv Gandhi Indian Institute of Management (rank 20), Indian

Institute of Management, Kashipur (rank 21) and Indian Institute of Management Ranchi (rank 28), set-up between

2007 and 2011, who have taken positions in the top 30 slots, are amongst the rising stars.




6.3. Pharmacy (Category A - Research and Teaching)

Low scores characterize the league table for Pharmacy (Category A- Research & Teaching). Manipal College of

Pharmaceutical Sciences at rank 1 with a weighted score of 77.87 closely followed by University Institute of

Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chandigarh at 2 rank with a weighted score of 77.10. Jamia Hamdard (rank 3), Poona

College of Pharmacy, Pune (rank 4) and Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University (rank 5) obtained weighted scores of

71.39, 70.93 and 69.76 respectively.

6.4. Universities

Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bengaluru is ranked as the first amongst universities with a weighted score of 91.81

closely followed by Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai, formerly University Department of Chemical

Technology (UDCT), University of Mumbai, which stands at rank 2 with a weighted score of 87.58. Ranks 3 to 8 are

occupied by the traditional, multi-disciplinary universities led by Jawaharlal Nehru University (rank 3) followed by

University of Hyderabad (rank 4), Tezpur University (rank 5), University of Delhi (rank 6), Banaras Hindu University

(rank 7) and Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology (rank 8) with weighted scores ranging from 86.46 (JNU)

to 78.83 (IISST). Birla Institute of Technology and Sciences (BITS, Pilani) each at 9th position with a weighted score of

76.85 closely followed by Aligarh Muslim University at rank 10 with a weighted score of 76.62.

Visva Bharati (rank 11; weighted score: 76.11) and Panjab University (rank 12; weighted score: 76.07) also secured a

distinction in terms of weighted score while two other universities namely, Pondicherry University (rank 13;

weighted score: 74.44) and Bharathiar University (rank 14; weighted score: 74.32) come very close.

It is noteworthy that King George Medical University, Lucknow (rank 16), Bidhan Chandra Krishi Vishvavidyalaya

(rank 31), Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Science University (rank 36) Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (rank

39) and National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (rank 50) are discipline-specific

institutions performing research and imparting education in medical, agricultural, veterinary, animal sciences, etc.

could find their places amongst multi-disciplinary universities and technological institutions. This demonstrates thatthe ranking parameters and the metric are generic enough to suit all kinds of educational institutions.

Rankings are based on the information and data provided by the institutions. Data on publications and citations have

been taken from standard indexing and citation sources, viz., Scopus (Elsevier Science), Web of Science (Thomson

Reuters) and the Indian Citation Index. Perception data has been compiled from inputs from general public and peers

NIRF has done limited validation of the data. However, responsibility for the accuracy and authenticity of the data lies

with the concerned institutions supplying it. Data are available on the NIRF portal.

7. Computation of Scores and Rankings: Top 25 in Each Category




Name Est.

Score

Indian Institute of Technology Madras 1959 Tamil Nadu Chennai 89.42 1

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay 1958 Maharashtra Bombay 87.67 2

Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur 1951 West Bengal Kharagpur 83.91 3

Indian Institute of Technology Delhi 1961 Delhi New Delhi 82.03 4

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur 1959 Uttar Pradesh Kanpur 81.07 5

Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 2001 Uttarakhand Roorkee 78.68 6

Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad 2008 Telangana Hyderabad 77.23 7

Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar 2008 Gujarat Ahmedabad 75.21 8

Indian Institute of Technology Ropar 2009 Punjab Rupnagar 74.89 9

Indian Institute of Technology Patna 2008 Bihar Patna 74.68 10

Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati 1994 Assam Guwahati 74.63 11

National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli 1964 Tamil Nadu Tiruchirappalli 74.45 12

Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 1984 Tamil Nadu Vellore 74.40 13

Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 2012 Uttar Pradesh Varanasi 74.39 14

Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat 1961 Gujarat Surat 73.13 15

Indian Institute of Technology Indore 2009 Madhya Pradesh Indore 72.01 16

Birla Institute of Technology, Ranchi 1955 Jharkhand Ranchi 71.81 17

Visvesvarya National Institute of Technology Nagpur 1960 Maharashtra Nagpur 71.29 18

National Institute of Technology Rourkela 1961 Odisha Rourkela 70.81 19

Indian Institute of Technology Mandi 2008 Himachal Pradesh Mandi 70.33 20

College of Engineering, Pune 1854 Maharashtra Pune 69.71 21

National Institute of Technology Karnataka 1960 Karnataka Mangalore 68.96 22

Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad 1961 Uttar Pradesh Allahabad 67.95 23

PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore 1951 Tamil Nadu Coimbatore 67.80 24

Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur 2008 Rajasthan Jodhpur 67.68 25

State City Weighted Rank


7.1. India Rankings 2016: Engineering Category “A”


http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/iifm-bhopal 16/41India Rankings 2016 11

7.2. India Rankings 2016: Management Category “A”

Name Est.

Score

Indian Institute of Management Bangalore 1972 Karnataka Bengaluru 93.04 1

Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad 1961 Gujarat Ahmedabad 89.92 2

Indian Institute of Management Calcutta 1961 West Bengal Kolkata 87.45 3

Indian Institute of Management Lucknow 1984 Uttar Pradesh Lucknow 86.13 4

Indian Institute of Management Udaipur 2010 Rajasthan Udaipur 84.23 5

Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode 1996 Kerala Kozhikode 81.97 6

International Management Institute, New Delhi 1981 Delhi New Delhi 81.78 7

Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal 1982 Madhya Pradesh Bhopal 81.01 8

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur 1959 Uttar Pradesh Kanpur 79.44 9

Indian Institute of Management Indore 1996 Madhya Pradesh Indore 78.63 10

Management Development Institute, Gurgaon 1972 Haryana Gurgaon 77.45 11

International Management Institute, Kolkata 2011 West Bengal Kolkata 77.17 12

Xavier Labour Relations Institute (XLRI), Jamshedpur 1949 Jharkhand Jamshedpur 75.30 13

Indian Institute of Management Tiruchirappalli 2011 Tamil Nadu Tiruchirappalli 75.24 14

Thiagarajar School of Management, Madurai 1962 Tamil Nadu Madurai 74.68 15

S. P. Jain Institute of Management & Research, Mumbai 1981 Maharashtra Mumbai 74.60 16

Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 1994 Tamil Nadu Vellore 73.01 17

Indian Institute of Management Raipur 2010 Chhattisgarh Raipur 72.42 18

Indian Institute of Management Rohtak 2009 Haryana Rohtak 72.37 19

Rajiv Gandhi Indian Institute of Management Shillong 2007 Meghalaya Shillong 71.94 20

Indian Institute of Management Kashipur 2011 Uttarakhand Kashipur 70.11 21

Indian Institute of Information Technology 1997 Madhya Pradesh Gwalior 69.42 22

& Management, Gwalior

Fore School of Management, New Delhi 1981 Delhi New Delhi 68.33 23

Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management, New Delhi 1995 Delhi New Delhi 68.18 24

Birla Institute of Technology, Ranchi 1955 Jharkhand Ranchi 67.66 25




Name Est.

Score

Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal 1963 Karnataka Manipal 77.87 1

University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chandigarh 1944 Chandigarh Chandigarh 77.10 2

Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 1989 Delhi New Delhi 71.39 3

Poona College of Pharmacy, Pune 1981 Maharashtra Pune 70.93 4

Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University, Ahmedabad 2003 Gujarat Ahmedabad 69.76 5

Bombay College of Pharmacy, Mumbai 1957 Maharashtra Mumbai 69.49 6

Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra 1955 Jharkhand Ranchi 67.00 7

Amrita School of Pharmacy, Kochi 2005 Kerala Kochi 66.10 8

JSS College of Pharmacy, Ootacamund 1980 Tamil Nadu Ootacamund 63.29 9

JSS College of Pharmacy, Mysore 1973 Karnataka Mysore 63.22 10

PSG College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore 2001 Tamil Nadu Coimbatore 61.30 11

L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad 1947 Gujarat Ahmedabad 60.56 12

Al Ameen College of Pharmacy, Bengaluru 1982 Karnataka Bengaluru 59.67 13

R. C. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical 1992 Maharashtra Shirpur 57.26 14

Education & Research, Shirpur

H. K. E. S S Matoshree Taradevi Rampure Institute of 1973 Karnataka Gulbarga 56.32 15

Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gulbarga

University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Warangal 1974 Telangana Warangal 56.17 16

Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Rajpura 2005 Punjab Rajpura 56.12 17

N.G.S.M.Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mangalore 1983 Karnataka Mangalore 55.26 18

School of Pharmacy, Solan 2008 Himachal Pradesh Solan 55.17 19

Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & 2002 Andhra Pradesh Anantapur 55.06 20

Research (RIPER), Anantapur

S.E.T's College of Pharmacy, Dharwad 1992 Karnataka Dharwad 54.97 21

University Institute of Pharmacy, Raipur 2001 Chhattisgarh Raipur 54.84 22

Goa College of Pharmacy, Panaji 1963 Goa Panaji 54.47 23

H. R. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and 2004 Maharashtra Shirpur 54.18 24

Research, Shirpur

Bharati Vidyapeeth College of Pharmacy, Kolhapur 1996 Maharashtra Kolhapur 53.97 25


7.3. India Rankings 2016: Pharmacy Category “A”



7.4. India Rankings 2016: Universities

Name Est.

Score

Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 1909 Karnataka Bengaluru 91.81 1

Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai 1933 Maharashtra Mumbai 87.58 2

Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 1969 Delhi New Delhi 86.46 3

University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad 1974 Telangana Hyderabad 85.45 4

Tezpur University, Tezpur 1994 Assam Tezpur 84.31 5

University of Delhi, Delhi 1922 Delhi Delhi 83.19 6

Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 1916 Uttar Pradesh Varanasi 81.22 7

Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, 2007 Kerala Thiruvananthapuram 78.83 8

Thiruvananthapuram

Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani 1964 Rajasthan Pilani 76.85 9

Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 1920 Uttar Pradesh Aligarh 76.62 10

Visva Bharati, Kolkata 1922 West Bengal Kolkata 76.11 11

Panjab University, Chandigarh 1882 Chandigarh Chandigarh 76.07 12

Pondicherry University, Puducherry 1985 Pondicherry Puducherry 74.44 13

Bharathiar University, Coimbatore 1982 Tamil Nadu Coimbatore 74.32 14

North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 1973 Meghalaya Shillong 72.42 15

King Georges Medical University, Lucknow 1905 Uttar Pradesh Lucknow 72.24 16

Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 2005 Maharashtra Mumbai 72.09 17

Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 1989 Delhi New Delhi 71.46 18

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore 2003 Tamil Nadu Coimbatore 71.03 19

Goa University, Goa 1985 Goa Goa 69.90 20

Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, New Delhi 1998 Delhi New Delhi 69.64 21

Gauhati University, Guwahati 1948 Assam Guwahati 68.57 22

International Institute of Information Technology, 1998 Telangana Hyderabad 68.36 23

Hyderabad

Guru Jambeshwar University of Science & Technology, 1995 Haryana Hissar 67.46 24

Hissar

Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar 1969 Punjab Amritsar 67.32 25




8. Top Ten Institutions in Each Category

Indian Institute of Technology Madras

(IIT Madras), set-up by Government of

India in 1959, is one among the foremost

Institutes of National Importance in

higher technological education, basic andapplied research. IIT Madras is located in

the city of Chennai, Tamil Nadu.

IIT Madras stands at the First position

with weighted score of 89.42. Its rank on

different parameters are as follows:

Parameter TLR RPC GO OI PR

Rank 2 2 5 1 4


8.1. Engineering (Category A-Research & Teaching)

Teaching, Learning and Resources (TLR) Graduation Outcome (GO)

FSR: Faculty Student Ratio PUE: Performance in University and Public Examinations

FQE: Metric for Faculty with Ph.D. and Experience PHE: Performance in Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship

LL: Metric for Library, Studio & Laboratory Facilities MS: Mean Salary for Employment

SEC: Metric for Sports and Extra Curricular Facilities Outreach and Inclusivity (OI)

CES: Outreach Footprint (Continuing Education, Services)

PU: Combined Metric for Publications RD: Percentage of Students from Other States / Countries

CI: Combined Metric for Citations WS: Percentage of Women Students and Faculty

IPR: Intellectual Property Right and Patents ESDS: Percentage of Economically and Socially Disadvantaged Students

CP: Collaborative Publications and Patents PCS: Facilities for Physically Challenged / Differently Abled Persons

FPPP: Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice Perception (

Research, Professional Practice & Collaborative Performance (RPC)

PR)

Abbreviations

Indian Institute of Technology Madras Rank - 1



Indian Institute of Technology Rank - 3Kharagpur

The Indian Institute of Technology

Kharagpur (IIT Kharagpur) is a public

engineering institution and Institute of

National Importance established by the

Government of India in 1951. The

Institute was established and started its

journey in the old Hijli Detention Camp,

Hijli, Kharagpur, West Bengal.

IIT Kharagpur stands at the Third

position with weighted score of 83.91. Its

rank on different parameters are as

follows:


Rank 8 4 4 2 5


Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Rank - 2


Bombay (IIT Bombay) is a public

engineering institution located in Powai,

M u m b a i , I n d i a . E s t a b l i s h e d b y

Government of India in 1958, IIT Bombay

is an Institute of National Importance and

a Deemed University.

IIT Bombay stands at the Second position




Rank 3 1 3 4 1



Indian Institute of Technology Rank - 5Kanpur

The Indian Institute of TechnologyKanpur is a public engineering &

research institute located in Kanpur,

Uttar Pradesh. It began functioning in

1959. It is an Institute of National

Importance declared by Government of

India under IIT Act.

IIT Kanpur stands at the Fifth position





Rank 10 3 2 6 1

Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Rank - 4

The Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

(IIT Delhi) is a public engineering and

research institute situated in Hauz Khas,

Delhi , India . The Inst itute was

established in 1961 as the College of

Engineering & Technology affiliated to

University of Delhi and was renamed

later as “Indian Institute of Technology

Delhi”. IIT Delhi is a Institute of National

Importance declared by Government of

India.

IIT Delhi stands at the Fourth position




Rank 5 5 8 8 3



Indian Institute of Technology Rank - 7Hyderabad

The Indian Institute of TechnologyHyderabad (IIT Hyderabad) is a public

engineering and research institute

located in Medak district, Telangana,

India. The Institute was started on 18

August 2008 from a temporary campus at

Ordnance Factory Medak's estate in

Yeddumailaram. Its permanent campus is

located in Kandi village, Medak.

IIT Hyderabad stands at the Seventhposition with weighted score of 77.23. Its


follows:


Rank 7 7 7 9 8


Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Rank - 6

Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

(IIT Roorkee), is the oldest Technical

Institution of Asia, and is among the

foremost of Institute of National

Importance in higher technological &

engineering education in the country.

The Institute is the seventh IIT to be

declared by Government of India in

September 21, 2001. It is located in

Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India.

IIT Roorkee stands at the Sixth position




Rank 9 6 6 3 6



Indian Institute of Technology Ropar Rank - 9

Indian Institute of Technology, Ropar is one

of the eight new IITs set up by the Ministry ofHuman Resource Development (MHRD),

Government of India in 2008, to expand the

reach and enhance the quality of technical

education in the country. IIT Ropar is located

at Rupnagar (formerly known as Ropar) in

the state of Punjab, India.

IIT Ropar stands at the Ninth position with

weighted score of 74.89. Its rank on



Rank 1 8 1 10 10


Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar Rank - 8


Gandhinagar, deemed an Institute of

National Importance by an Act of the Indian

Parliament, strives to offer the best

undergraduate engineering education in

India. IIT Gandhinagar was founded by

MHRD, Government of India in 2008 and is

located in Simkheda, Gandhinagar, Gujarat.

IIT Gandhinagar stands at the Eighth



follows:

Parameter TLR RPC GO OI PRRank 4 9 10 5 7



Indian Institute of Technology Rank - 10Patna

The Indian Institute of Technology Patna

(IIT Patna) is an autonomous institute of

engineering, technical education and

research located in Patna, Bihar, India.

IIT Patna is one of the eight new IITs

established by the Ministry of Human

Resource Development (MHRD),

Government of India on August 06, 2008.

The Institute is recognized as an Institute

o f N at i o n al I mp o r t an ce b y t he

Government of India.

IIT Patna stands at the Tenth position




Rank 6 10 9 7 9



Indian Institute of Management Bangalore Rank -1

Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad Rank -2

The Indian Institute of Management

Bangalore (IIM Bangalore) is a premiere

public business school located in the

Indian's Silicon Valley, the city of

Bengaluru, Karnataka. The Institute is the

third IIM to be established in the country

in the year 1973.

Indian Institute of Management

Bangalore stands at the First position




Rank 1 1 1 1 4


Ahmedabad (IIM Ahmedabad) is a top-notch public business school located in the city of

Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. The Institute

was established on December 11, 1961 and is

the second IIM to be established in the

country.

Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad

stands at the Second position with weighted

score of 89.92. Its rank on different

parameters are as follows:


Rank 4 4 2 2 1

8.2. Management (Category A-Research & Teaching)




Indian Institute of Management Calcutta Rank -3

Indian Institute of Management Lucknow Rank - 4


Calcutta (IIM Calcutta) was established

as the first national institute for post-

graduate studies and research in

management by the Government of Indiain November 1961. The Institute is

located at Joka, Kolkata, West Bengal.

Indian Institute of Management Calcutta

stands at the Third position with




Rank 6 2 3 4 5


Lucknow (IIM Lucknow) is fourth in the prestigious IIM family of management

schools established in India. The Institute

was established in the year 1984. The

Institute is located in the city of Lucknow,

Uttar Pradesh, India.

Indian Institute of Management Lucknow

stands at the Fourth position with weighted




Rank 7 7 4 3 2




Indian Institute of Management Udaipur Rank - 5

Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode Rank - 6


Udaipur (IIM Udaipur) is a business

management school located in the city of

Udaipur, Rajasthan, India. Established in

2010, the Institute is currentlyfunctioning in a temporary campus at

Mohanial Sukhadia University, Udaipur,

Rajasthan.

Indian Institute of Management Udaipur

stands at the Fifth position with




Rank 8 5 5 6 7


Kozhikode (IIM Kozhikode) is an renowned business school to offer post-graduate

programs. It is situated on two hillocks in the

Kunnamangalam area of ancient city of

Calicut, Kerala, India. Established in 1996,

IIMK was the fifth IIM to be established in

the country.

Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode

stands at the Sixth position with weighted




Rank 9 6 6 5 5




International Management Institute, New Delhi Rank - 7

Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal Rank -8

The International Management Institute,

New Delhi is a private business school

nestled in Qutab Institutional Area, New

Delhi, India. IMI was established in 1981

in collaboration with IMI Geneva (nowIMD, Lausanne). The Institute is India’s

first corporate sponsored business

school.

International Management Institute New

Delhi stands at the Seventh position with




Rank 5 9 8 9 8

The Indian Institute of Forest Management

(IIFM) is a sectoral autonomousmanagement institute, located in the central

Indian city of Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.

IIFM was established and funded by the

Ministry of Environment and Forests,

Government of India in the year 1982.

Indian Institute of Forest Management

Bhopal stands at the Eighth position with




Rank 3 10 9 8 9




Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Rank - 9

Indian Institute of Management Indore Rank - 10


Kanpur is a public engineering &

research institute located in Kanpur,

Uttar Pradesh. It began functioning in

1959. It is an Institute of NationalImportance declared by Government of

India under IIT Act.

IIT Kanpur stands at the Ninth position




Rank 2 3 10 10 10

The Indian Institute of Management Indore

(IIM Indore) is an autonomous public business school located in Indore, Madhya

Pradesh, India. Established in 1996, IIM

Indore is the sixth in the family of IIM to be

established by Government of India.

Indian Institute of Management Indore

stands at the Tenth position with weighted




Rank 10 8 7 7 3




Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Rank -1

University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chandigarh Rank -2

Manipal College of Pharmaceutical

Sciences, Manipal widely known as

MCOPS, has a unique standing for

o f f er i n g p r o f ess i o n al p har macy

education in the country. It is presently

one of the premier institutions of Manipal

University, Manipal, Karnataka. The

college was started in the year 1963.

Manipal College of Pharmaceutical

Sciences, Manipal stands at the First

position with weighted score of 77.87.

Its rank on different parameters are as

follows:


Rank 1 8 2 5 5

The University Institute of Pharmaceutical

Sciences (UIPS) is a premier institution of pharmaceutical education and research in the

country. The Institute is elevated from the

status of department to the level of an

institute i.e. University Institute of

Pharmaceutical Sciences in 1994, and is a

constituent college of Panjab University,

Chandigarh, Punjab.

University Institute of Pharmaceutical

Sciences, Chandigarh stands at the Second



follows:


Rank 2 1 7 8 6

8.3. Pharmacy (Category A-Research & Teaching)




Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi Rank - 3

Poona College of Pharmacy, Pune Rank - 4

Jamia Hamdard is a Deemed University

accredited by MHRD, Government of

India. The history of Jamia Hamdard

begins with the establishment of a small

Unani clinic in the year 1906 by HakeemHafiz Abdul Majeed, one of the well-

known practitioners of Unani System of

M e d i c i n e . T h e U n i v e r s i t y w a s

inaugurated by Late Shri Rajiv Gandhi on

August 01, 1989, and is located in New

Delhi, India.

Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi stands at the

Third position with weighted score of

71.39. Its rank on different parametersare as follows:


Rank 3 2 5 9 8

The Poona College of Pharmacy is known to be as one of the best pharmacy colleges in the

country. Established in the year 1981 by Dr.

Patangrao Kadam, founder of Bharati

Vidyapeeth, the College is a constituent unit

of Bharati Vidyapeeth since 2000. The

College is located in Bharati Vidyapeeth

Educational Complex, Pune, Maharashtra.

Poona College of Pharmacy, Pune stands at

the Fourth position with weighted score of

70.93. Its rank on different parameters are

as follows:


Rank 8 3 8 3 1




Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University, Ahmedabad Rank - 5

Bombay College of Pharmacy, Mumbai Rank - 6

The Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma

University was established in the year

2003, with a view to promote excellence

in pharmaceutical education in the

country. The Institute is located in thecampus of Nirma University, Ahmedabad,

Gujarat.

Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University

stands at the Fifth position with




Rank 6 6 3 2 6

Bombay College of Pharmacy (BCP) is a

pioneering institution in pharmaceuticaleducation in India. BCP was founded in 1957

by the Indian Pharmaceutical Association -

Maharashtra State Branch (IPA-MSB) with

financial assistance from Government of

Maharashtra. The College is permanently

affiliated to University of Mumbai, and is

located at Santacruz (E), Mumbai,

Maharashtra.

Bombay College of Pharmacy stands at the

Sixth position with weighted score of


as follows:


Rank 7 4 6 7 2




Birla Institute of Technology, Ranchi Rank -7

Amrita School of Pharmacy, Kochi Rank - 8

Birla Institute of Technology (BIT) is

located at Mesra, Jharkhand. Established in

the year 1955 by Mr. B M Birla, BIT Mesra is

a premier technical institute and deemed

University under Sec. 3 of the U.G.C. Act

1956. The Department of Pharmaceutical

Sciences and Technology was established in

1972 at BIT Mesra. The courses offered are

recognized by the UGC, Pharmacy Council

of India and AICTE.

Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra stands

at the Seventh position with weighted




Rank 5 7 4 10 4

The Amrita School of Pharmacy is an

integral component of Amrita ViswaVidyapeetham University, Coimbatore,

Tamil Nadu. It is the first to start functioning

among all schools in 2005 at the Kochi,

Kerala based Health Sciences Campus of the

university. The Amrita School of Pharmacy

is recognised by the Pharmacy Council of

India (PCI) and AICTE, New Delhi.

Amrita School of Pharmacy, Kochi stands at

the Eighth position with weighted score of


as follows:


Rank 4 9 1 6 10




JSS College of Pharmacy, Ootacamund Rank -9

JSS College of Pharmacy, Mysore Rank -10

JSS College of Pharmacy (JSSCP), Ooty was

established in 1980 with a view to provide

job oriented professional courses in

Pharmacy. The College is affiliated to the

JSS University, Mysore and approved by

AICTE, Pharmacy Council of India (PCI),

Govt. of Tamil Nadu and recognized by

other statutory bodies.

JSS College of Pharmacy, Ooty stands at the

Ninth position with weighted score of


as follows:


Rank 10 5 10 1 9

JSS College of Pharmacy is a constituent

college of Jagadguru Sri ShivarathreeshwaraUniversity, Mysore, Karnataka. The College

was started in the year 1973 to become a

centre for excellence in pharmaceutical

education & research in the country. It is

situated at Sri Shivarathreeshwara Nagara on

Mysore-Bangalore highway opposite to JSS

institutions campus.

JSS College of Pharmacy, Mysore stands at

the Tenth position with weighted score of


as follows:


Rank 9 10 9 4 3




Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bengaluru Rank -1

Institute of Chemical Technology Mumbai Rank -2

The Indian Institute of Science (IISc) was

formally vested in 1909, the foundation

stone was laid in 1911 as a result of the joint

efforts of Jamsetji Nusserwanji Tata, the

Government of India, and the Maharaja of

Mysore. Since its establishment, IISc has

become the premier institute for advanced

scientific and technological research and

education in India. The University is located

in the city of Bengaluru, Karnataka.

Indian Institute of Science Bangalore stands

at the First position with weighted score of

91.81. Its rank on different parameters areas follows:


Rank 1 2 1 7 1

The Institute of Chemical Technology (ICT),

formerly known as the UniversityDepartment of Chemical Technology

(UDCT), is a premier chemical technology

research institute located in Mumbai,

Maharashtra, India. The Institute was

established on 1st October, 1933 by the

University of Mumbai and was granted

deemed university status in 2008.

Institute of Chemical Technology Mumbai

stands at the Second position with




Rank 5 1 6 9 6

8.4. Universities




Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Rank -3

University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad Rank -4

The Jawaharlal Nehru University is a public

central university located in New Delhi, the

capital of India. The University was

established in 1969 by an act of parliament. It

was named after Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru, the

first Prime Minister of India.

Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi

stands at the Third position with weighted




Rank 3 7 1 5 3

The University of Hyderabad is a premier

institution of postgraduate teaching andresearch in the country. The University, also

known as Hyderabad Central University, is

located in Hyderabad, Telangana, India. It

was founded in 1974.

The University of Hyderabad stands at the

Fourth position with weighted score of


as follows:


Rank 7 3 9 1 4




Tezpur University, Tezpur Rank -5

University of Delhi, Delhi Rank - 6

Tezpur University is a Central University

located in Tezpur in the North Eastern state

of Assam, India. It was established on

January 21, 1994 by an act in Parliament of

India, the Tezpur University Act, 1993 (Act

No.45) as an residential university.

Tezpur University stands at the Fifth position




Rank 6 5 8 4 9

The University of Delhi, informally known

as Delhi University is one of the premierCentral University of the country located in

Delhi, the capital of India. It was established

in 1922 as a unitary, teaching and residential

university by an Act of the then Central

Legislative Assembly.

The University of Delhi stands at the Sixth



follows:


Rank 9 4 5 3 4




Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi Rank -7

Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram Rank -8

Banaras Hindu University (BHU) is an

internationally reputed institution situated in

the holy city of Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh,

India. The University was founded by the

great nationalist leader, Pandit Madan

Mohan Malviya, in 1916. Banaras Hindu

Universi ty was created under the

Parliamentary legislation - BHU Act 1915.

Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi stands at

the Seventh position with weighted score

of 81.22. Its rank on different parameters

are as follows:


Rank 8 8 7 2 2

The Indian Institute of Space Science and

T e c h n o l o g y ( I I S T ) , s i t u a t e d a tThiruvananthapuram is a Deemed to be

University under Section 3 of the UGC Act

1956. The institute, first of its kind in the

country which is solely engaged in space

research & applications, was formally

inaugurated on 14 September 2007 by Dr. G.

Madhavan Nair, the then Chairman, ISRO,

and functions as an autonomous body under

the Department of Space, Government of

India.

Indian Institute of Space Science and

Technology stands at the Eighth position




Rank 2 10 1 6 8




Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh Rank - 10

Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) is a

public central university, funded by

Government of India. The University wasestablished in 1920, and evolved out of the

Mohammedan Anglo-Oriental College

(MAO College) which was set up in 1877 by

the great visionary and social reformer, Sir

Syed Ahmad Khan. It is an Institution of

National Importance located in Aligarh,

Uttar Pradesh.

AMU Aligarh stands at the Tenth position

with weighted score of 76.62. Its rank ondifferent parameters are as follows:


Rank 10 6 10 8 10


Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani Rank - 9

The Birla Institute of Technology and

Science (BITS Pilani) is an all-India Institute

for higher education and a Deemed

University under Section 3 of the UGC Act

1956. The Institute was incepted as an

Institute with Dr. G. D. Birla as Founder

Chairman in 1964 at Pilani, Rajasthan. It is

run and funded by the Birla Education Trust.

Birla Institute of Technology and Science,

Pilani stands at the Ninth position with




Rank 4 9 1 10 7



9. Collaborators

9.1 National Board of Accreditation (NBA)

The National Board of Accreditation was assigned the responsibility for inviting applications for ranking of institutions for all

the six disciplines using NIRF Framework and for anchoring the effort for “India Rankings 2016”. NBA also serves the

Implementation Core Committee (ICC) constituted by the MHRD as well as all other committees set-up to examine the data

for all five sets of parameters under each of the six disciplines.

9.2 All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE)

The AICTE was instrumental in providing authenticated data on institutions that are approved for offering graduate and

postgraduate-level courses in four disciplines, namely engineering, management, pharmacy and architecture.The AICTE

also encouraged institutions to apply for ranking under NIRF framework.

9.3. University Grants Commission (UGC)

The UGC provided authenticated data on colleges and universities under its purview. The UGC also encouraged universities

and colleges to apply for ranking under NIRF framework.

9.4. INFLIBNET Centre

The services of INFLIBNET Centre were taken for developing NIRF Web Portal as well as for providing data on publications,

citations and collaborations.

9.5. Academic Partners

Web of Science (Thomson Reuters), Scopus (Elsevier) and Indian Citation Index was used for retrieving data on publications,

citations and collaborations. These three publishers were contacted to help out in the process of retrieving data for some of the

institutions who had applied for ranking through NIRF. Their contributions are gratefully acknowledged.




National Institutional Ranking Framework