Transcript
Page 1: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page1of25

FloridaStateUniversityEducatorPreparationUnit–AssessmentSystem

FEAPSignatureAssessmentDescriptions

SignatureAssessment#1:EarlyLessonPlan

Description:TheteachercandidatewillcreateadevelopmentallyappropriatelessonplanthatincludesobjectivesthatareclearlywrittenandalignedwithappropriateFloridastandards;conceptsand/orskillsthatarelogicallysequencedthroughoutthelesson;andopportunitiesforstudentstodemonstrateavarietyofapplicableskillsandcompetencieswithintheinstructionalactivities.Duringtheintroductionportionofthelessonplan,candidatesshoulddescribehowtheywillconveyhighexpectationstoallstudents.FEAPs:1a,1b,1f,2cFEAPMeasurableIndicatorRubric

1a.Alignsinstructionwithstate-adoptedstandardsattheappropriatelevelofrigor.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotalignobjectiveswithstate-adoptedstandards.

Developing1:

Thecandidatedevelopsobjectivesforstate-adoptedstandards.

Developing2:

Thecandidatealignsobjectiveswithstate-adoptedstandards.

Target:

Thecandidatealignsobjectiveswithstate-adoptedstandardsatappropriatelevelsofrigorforallstudents.

1b.Sequencesconceptsandskillswithinlearningexperiences. Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotsequenceconceptsandskillstoensurecoherenceandrequired.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesrequiredmajorconceptsandskillsinatargetedlearningarea.

Developing2:

Thecandidatesequencesconceptsandskillswithinlessonsinatargetedlearningarea.

Target:

Thecandidatesequencesconceptsandskillswithinlearningexperiences.

Page 2: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page2of25

1f.Developslearningexperiencesthatrequirestudentstodemonstrateavarietyofapplicableskillsandcompetencies.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatecannotdevelopactivitiesthatdemonstrateavarietyofapplicableskillsandcompetencies.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieslearningexperiencesthatallowallstudentstodemonstrateavarietyofapplicableskillsandcompetencies.

Developing2:

Thecandidatedesignslearningexperiencesthatallowallstudentstodemonstrateavarietyofapplicableskillsandcompetencies.

Target:

Thecandidatedevelopslearningexperiencesthatallowallstudentstodemonstrateavarietyofapplicableskillsand/orcompetencies.

2c.Conveyshighexpectationstoallstudents. Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotconveyhighexpectations.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesvariousmethodsforconveyinghighexpectations.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsappropriatestrategiesforconveyinghighexpectations.

Target:

Thecandidateconsistentlyconveyshighexpectations.

SignatureAssessment#2:EarlyTeachingPhilosophyDescription:Teachercandidateswillwriteateachingphilosophybasedontheirbeliefsaboutteachingandlearning.Withinthephilosophy,teachercandidatesmustaddresshowtheywouldaddressvariouscultural,linguistic,andfamilybackgrounddifferencesintheirclassrooms;describeappropriateinformationandcommunicationtechnologiestheywoulduse;andreflectonwaystheycanapplycontentlearnedandimprovefuturepractice.Finishedproductsmustreflectteachercandidates’abilitytoeffectivelycommunicateideas.FEAPs:2d,2e,2g,5e1,5e2,5f2d.Respectsstudents’culturallinguisticandfamilybackground. Unacceptable:

Page 3: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page3of25

Thecandidatedoesnotdemonstraterespectforstudents’cultural,linguistic,orfamilybackground.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstrategiesfordemonstratingrespectforvariousstudentcultural,linguistic,andfamilybackgrounddifferences.

Developing2:

Thecandidate’swrittenandverbalcommunicationisconsistentlyclearandacceptable.

Target:

Thecandidatemodelsclear,acceptableoralandwrittencommunicationskillstostudents.

2e.Modelsclear,acceptableoralandwrittencommunicationskills Unacceptable:

Thecandidatefailstouseclear,acceptablecommunicationskills.

Developing1:

Thecandidateinconsistentlydemonstratesclearandacceptablewrittenandverbalcommunicationskills.

Developing2:

Thecandidate’swrittenandverbalcommunicationisconsistentlyclearandacceptable.

Target:

Thecandidatemodelsclear,acceptableoralandwrittencommunicationskillstostudents.

2g.Integratescurrentinformationandcommunicationtechnologies.

Currentinformationandcommunicationtechnologies:

Districttechnologies,i.e.SmartBoards,software

Technologyforpedagogy

Unacceptable:

Thereisnoevidencethecandidateusescurrentinformationandcommunicationtechnologiesforinstruction.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiescurrentinformationandcommunicationtechnologies.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectstheappropriateinformationandcommunicationtechnologies.

Target:

Thecandidateintegratescurrentinformationandcommunicationtechnologies.

Page 4: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page4of25

5e1.Appliesinformationobtainedfromprofessionallearningexperiencestohis/herownneedsandtheneedsoflearners,school,andsystem.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotapplyinformationobtainedfromprofessionallearningexperiencestohis/herownneedsandtheneedsoflearners,school,andsystem.

Developing1:

ThecandidateIdentifieswaystocollaborativelyworkwithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaystocollaborativelyworkwithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

Target:

Thecandidateworkscollaborativelywithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

5e2.Engagesinreflectionbyanalyzingdecisionsmadeandarticulatingwaystoimprovefuturepractice.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotengageinreflection.

Developing1:

Thecandidateengagesinreflectionbyanalyzingdecisionsmade.

Developing2:

Thecandidateengagesinreflectionbyanalyzingdecisionsmadeandrecognizingtheneedtoimprovefuturepractice.

Target:

Thecandidateengagesinreflectionbyanalyzingdecisionsmadeandarticulatingwaystoimprovefuturepractice.

5f.Implementsknowledgeandskillslearnedinprofessionaldevelopmentintheteachingandlearningprocess

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotuseavarietyofstrategiestoanalyzeandreflectonhis/herpracticeandforadaptions/adjustments.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesavarietyofstrategiestoanalyzeandreflectonhis/herpracticeandoradaptions/adjustments.

Page 5: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page5of25

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavarietyofstrategiestoanalyzeandreflectonhis/herpracticeandforadaptions/adjustments.

Target:

Thecandidateusesavarietyofstrategiestoanalyzeandreflectonhis/herpracticeandforadaptions/adjustments.

SignatureAssessment#3:Unit-WideEthicsModuleAssignmentDescription:Candidateswillcompleteaprofessionalresponsibilityandethicalconductmodulewithintheirfirstsemester.Thegoalistohelpcandidatesbetterunderstandethicsineducationaswellasthehighlevelofprofessionalismrequiredbythefield.Theunit-widemodulewillincludethefollowingcomponents:CodeofEthicsandPrinciplesofProfessionalConducttopre-professionalandpersonalsituations;statutorygroundsandproceduresfordisciplinaryactionandpenaltiesthatcanbeimposedbytheEPCagainstcertificateholdersaswellastheappealsprocessavailable;legalresponsibilitiesandproceduresforreportingabuse,neglect,andothersignsofdistress;appropriateuseofstudentrecords;andpoliciesandproceduresrelatedtothesafeandethicaluseoftechnology.FEAPs:6a,6b,6c,6d6a.ApplytheCodeofEthicsandPrincipalsofProfessionalConducttopre-professionalandpersonalsituations.

Unacceptable:

ThecandidatedoesnotapplytheCodeofEthicsandPrincipalsofProfessionalConducttopre-professionalandpersonalsituations.

Developing1:

ThecandidateidentifiesspecificethicandprinciplesintheCodeofEthicsandPrincipalsofProfessionalConduct.

Developing2:

ThecandidateidentifieshowtoapplytheCodeofEthicsandPrincipalsofProfessionalConducttopre-professionalandpersonalsituations.

Target:

ThecandidateappliestheCodeofEthicsandPrincipalsofProfessionalConducttopre-professionalandpersonalsituations.

6b.Identifystatutorygroundsandproceduresfordisciplinaryaction,thepenaltiesthatcanbeimposedbytheEPCagainstacertificateholder,

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotidentifystatutorygroundsandproceduresfordisciplinaryaction,thepenaltiesthatcanbeimposedbytheEPCagainstacertificateholderandtheappealsprocessavailabletotheindividual.

Page 6: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page6of25

andtheappealsprocessavailabletotheindividual. Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstatutorygroundsandproceduresfordisciplinaryaction,butdoesnotcorrectlyidentifypenaltiesthatcanbeimposedortheappealsprocessavailabletoindividuals.

Developing2:

Thecandidateidentifiesstatutorygroundsandproceduresfordisciplinaryactionandpenaltiesthatcanbeimposed,butdoesnotcorrectlyidentifytheappealsprocessavailabletoindividuals.

Target:

Thecandidateidentifiesstatutorygroundsandproceduresfordisciplinaryaction,thepenaltiesthatcanbeimposedbytheEPCagainstacertificateholderandtheappealsprocessavailabletotheindividual.

6c.Applieslawsrelatedtolearners’rightsandteacherresponsibilities,e.g.educationalequity,appropriateeducationforlearnerswithdisabilities,confidentially,privacy,appropriatetreatmentoflearners,reportinginsituationsrelatedtopossiblechildabuse

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotapplylawsrelatedtolearners’rightsandteacherresponsibilities,e.g.educationalequity,appropriateeducationforlearnerswithdisabilities,confidentiality,privacy,appropriatetreatmentoflearners,reportinginsituationsrelatedtopossiblechildabuse.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiessomeofthelawsrelatedtolearners’rightsandteacherresponsibilities,e.g.educationalequity,appropriateeducationforlearnerswithdisabilities,confidentially,privacy,appropriatetreatmentoflearners,reportinginsituationsrelatedtopossiblechildabuse.

Developing2:

Thecandidateidentifieslawsrelatedtolearners’rightsandteacherresponsibilities,e.g.educationalequity,appropriateeducationforlearnerswithdisabilities,confidentiality,privacy,appropriatetreatmentoflearners,reportinginsituationsrelatedtopossiblechildabuseinplanning

Target:

Thecandidateapplieslawsrelatedtolearners’rightsandteacherresponsibilities,e.g.educationalequity,appropriateeducationforlearnerswithdisabilities,confidentiality,privacy,appropriatetreatmentoflearners,reportinginsituationsrelatedtopossiblechildabuseinstudentteaching.

6d.Appliespoliciesandproceduresforthesafeandethicaluseoftechnologies.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotapplypoliciesandproceduresforthesafeandethicaluseoftechnologies.

Developing1:

Page 7: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page7of25

Thecandidateidentifiespoliciesandproceduresforthesafeandethicaluseoftechnologies.

Developing2:

Thecandidateidentifiesallofthepoliciesandproceduresforthesafeandethicaluseoftechnologies

Target:

Thecandidateappliespoliciesandproceduresforthesafeandethicaluseoftechnologies.

SignatureAssessment#4:ClassroomManagementAssignmentDescription:Teachercandidateswillcreateaplanforequitablyorganizingandallocatingresources,aswellascommunicatingwithhome.Areasoftheplancanincludeclassroomarrangement,rules,procedures,andcommunicationwithhome.FEAPs:2a1,2a2,5d

2a1.Thecandidateequitablyorganizesresources.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotorganizeresourcesequitably.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesmultiplewaystoorganizeresourcesequitably.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaystoorganizeresourcesequitably.

Target:

Thecandidateequitablyallocatesresources.

2a2.Thecandidateequitablyallocatesresources.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotequitablyallocateresources.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesmultiplewaystoallocateresourcesequitably.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaystoorganizeresourcesequitably.

Target:

Page 8: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page8of25

Thecandidateequitablyorganizesresources.

5d.Collaborateswiththehome,schoolandlargercommunitiestofostercommunicationandtosupportstudentlearningandcontinuousimprovement.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotcollaborativelyworkwithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

Developing1:

ThecandidateIdentifieswaystocollaborativelyworkwithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaystocollaborativelyworkwithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

Target:

Thecandidateworkscollaborativelywithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

SignatureAssessment#5:AssessmentCaseStudyAssignmentDescription:Givenasetofstudentdatafrommultipleassessments,thecandidatewillanalyzedatatodiagnosestudents’learningneedsandtoinformthedevelopmentoflessonplans.Thecandidatewilluseavarietyofassessmenttoolstomonitorstudentprogressandtoinformthemodificationofinstruction.Thecandidatewilldevelopaplanforcommunicatingassessmentoutcomeswithstudentsandtheircaregivers.FEAPs:1e,4a1,4a2,4c,4e1e.Usediagnosticstudentdatatoplanlessons. Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotidentifyorusesourcesofdiagnosticstudentdatatoplanlessons.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesdiagnosticstudentdatathatareconsistentwithdevelopmentandlearningtheoriesforthegrade/agetoplanlessons.

Developing2:

Thecandidateinterpretsdiagnosticstudentdatathatisconsistentwithdevelopmentandlearningtheoriesattheage/grade-appropriatelevelofrigortohelpplanlessons.

Target:

Thecandidateappliesdiagnosticstudentdatathatisconsistentwithdevelopmentandlearningtheoriesatthe

Page 9: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page9of25

appropriatelevelofrigortoplanlessons.

4a1.Analyzesavarietyofassessmentdatatodiagnosestudentlearningneeds.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotanalyzeassessmentdata.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstudentlearningneedsbasedonanalyzedassessmentdata.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsanalyzedassessmentdatatodiagnosestudentlearningneeds.

Target:

Thecandidateanalyzesdatafromavarietyofsourcestodiagnosestudentlearningneeds.

4a2.Appliesdatafrommultipleassessmentstomodifyorinforminstruction

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotapplyassessmentdatatomodifyorinforminstruction.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesassessmentdatathatcanbeusedtomodifyorinforminstruction.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsassessmentdatathatcanbeusedtomodifyorinforminstruction.

Target:

Thecandidateappliesdatafrommultipleassessmentstomodifyorinforminstruction.

4c.Usesavarietyofassessmenttoolstomonitorstudentprogress,i.e.learninggains,masteryofcontent,studentgaps,etc.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotuseavarietyofassessmenttoolstomonitorstudentprogress.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesavarietyofassessmenttoolstomonitorstudentprogress.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavarietyofassessmenttoolstomonitorstudentprogress.

Page 10: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page10of25

Target:

Thecandidateusesavarietyofformativeandsummativeassessmenttoolstomonitorstudentprogress.

4e.Communicatesoutcomesofassessmentdatawithstudentsandstudents’caregivers.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotcommunicatetheoutcomesofassessmentdatawithstudentsandcaregivers.

Developing1:

Thecandidatedescribeshowoutcomeswillbecommunicatedtostudentsandcaregivers.

Developing2:

Thecandidatedesignsmethodsforcommunicatingoutcomesofstudentassessmentdatatostudentsandcaregivers.

Target:

Thecandidatecommunicatestheoutcomesofstudentassessmentdatawiththestudentsandcaregivers.

SignatureAssessment#6:ESOLLessonPlanDescription:CandidateswillcreateadetailedcontentbasedlessonplanforaclassthatcontainsbothEnglishandnon-Englishspeakingpupils.Thelessonplan(atminimum)mustexemplifystudentmasterybyaddressingthefollowing:learninggoalsandobjectives(bothcontentandlanguage);supportoflearninggoals,outcomesandobjectivesviaappropriatelearningtasksanddelivery;integrationofcontentwithotherdisciplinesandlifeexperiences;appropriateformativeassessmentstomonitorlearning;andassessments(formative&summative)thatalignwithlearningobjectivesanddemonstratemasteryoflearningobjectives.FEAPs:4b1,4b2,1c,1d,3e4b1.Designsformativeassessmentsthataligntolearningobjectives. Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdesignformativeassessmentsthatmatchlearningobjectives.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesformativeassessmentsthatmatchlearningobjectives.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsformativeassessmentsthatmatchlearningobjectives.

Target:

Thecandidatedesignsformativeassessmentsthatmatchlearningobjectives.

Page 11: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page11of25

4b2.Designssummativeassessmentsthatallowstudentstodemonstratemasteryoflearningobjectives.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdesignsummativeassessmentsthatallowstudentstodemonstratemasteroflearningobjectives.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiessummativeassessmentsthatallowforstudentstodemonstratemasteryoflearningobjectives.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectssummativeassessmentsthatallowforstudentstodemonstratemasteryoflearningobjectives.

Target:

Thecandidatedesignssummativeassessmentsthatallowstudentstodemonstratemasteryoflearningobjectives.

1c.Designsinstructionforstudentstoachievemastery.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdesignlessonsorunitofinstructionforalllearnerstoachievemastery.

Developing1:

Thecandidatedesignslesson(s)thatenablealllearnerstoachievemastery.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectslessons(s)thatenablealllearnerstoachievemastery.

Target:

Thecandidatedesignsaunitofinstructionthatenableslearnerstoachievemastery.

1d.Selectsappropriateformativeassessmentstomonitorlearning.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotselectappropriateformativeassessmentstomonitorlearning.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesappropriateformativeassessmentstomonitorlearning.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsappropriateformativeassessmentstomonitorlearning.

Page 12: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page12of25

Target:

Thecandidateintegratesmultipleformativeassessmentswithinlessonplanstomonitorlearning.

3e.Relateandintegratethesubjectmatterwithotherdisciplinesandlifeexperiences.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotintegratesubjectmatterwithlearners’lifeexperiencesand/orotherdisciplines.

Developing1:

Thecandidaterelatessubjectmatterwithlearners’lifeexperiencesand/orotherdisciplines.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsmethodsforintegratingsubjectmatterwithlearners’lifeexperiencesand/orotherdisciplines.

Target:

Thecandidateintegratessubjectmatterwithlearners’lifeexperiencesand/orotherdisciplines.

SignatureAssessment#7:ContentAreaLiteracyLessonPlanDescription:Inthislessonplan,candidateswillincludeapplicationofappropriatecontentarealiteracystrategiesandprovidestudentswithopportunitiestoapplysubjectmatterandtoexplainaswellasjustifytheirthinkingthroughwrittenand/ororalexpression.Candidateswillthenapplyavarietyofdataindependentlyaswellaswithcolleaguestoevaluatestudents’learningoutcomes,adjustplanning,andcontinuouslyimprovelessoneffectiveness.FEAPs:3b1,3b2,3b3,5b,5c3b1.Appliesappropriatecontentarealiteracystrategies. Unacceptable:

Thecandidateisunabletoapplycontentarealiteracystrategies.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiescontentarealiteracystrategiesthatsupportstudentunderstanding.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectscontentarealiteracystrategiesthatsupportstudentunderstanding.

Target:

Thecandidateappliescontentarealiteracystrategiesininstructionthatsupportstudentunderstanding.

3b2.Providesstudentsopportunitiestoexplainandjustifytheirthinkingthroughwritten

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotprovideopportunitiesforstudentstoexplainandjustifytheirthinking.

Page 13: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page13of25

and/ororalexpression.

Exittickets

Questionstoaskstudents

EssentialQuestion

Levelofunderstandingthroughselection,communicationdevices,manipulatives,pictureboards.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesopportunitiesforstudentstoexplainandjustifytheirthinking.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsopportunitiesforavarietyofstudentstoexplainandjustifytheirthinking.

Target:

Thecandidateprovidesdifferentiatedopportunitiesforavarietyofstudentstoexplainandjustifytheirthinking.

3b3.Providesopportunitiesforstudentstoapplysubjectmatter.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotprovideopportunitiesforstudenttoapplysubjectmatter.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaysforstudentstoapplysubjectmatter.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaysforavarietyofstudentstoapplysubjectmatter.

Target:

Thecandidateprovidesopportunitiesforavarietyofstudentstoapplysubjectmatter.

5b.Usesdatainformedresearchtoimproveinstructionandstudentachievement.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotusedatainformedresearchtoimproveinstructionandstudentachievement.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesmethodsforimprovinginstructionbasedondatainformedresearch.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsmethodsforimprovinginstructionbasedondatainformedresearch.

Target:

Thecandidateappliesmethodsforimprovinginstructionbasedondatainformedresearch.

5c.Appliesavarietyofdata, Unacceptable:

Page 14: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page14of25

independentlyandcollaboratively,foruseintheinstructionalprocess.

Thecandidatedoesnotuseavarietyofdataintheinstructionalprocess.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesavarietydataforuseintheinstructionalprocess.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavarietyofdataforuseintheinstructionalprocess.

Target:

Thecandidateappliesavarietyofdata,independentlyandcollaboratively,foruseintheinstructionalprocess.

SignatureAssessment#8:FieldExperienceInstructionalImpactAnalysisDescription:Adetailedassignmentdescriptionisavailable.Componentsofthisimpactanalysisinclude:

• DesignUnitPlano TeachaMinimumof2Lessonso ClassroomTeacherEvaluationForm(2Lessons)

• PreandPostAssessment• AnalysisofData• ReportingofData• Reflection

FEAPs:2b,2f1,2f2,2h,2i,3a,3c,3d,3f,3g,3h,3i,3j,4d,4f,5a2b.Managesindividualandclassbehaviorsthroughawell-plannedmanagementsystem.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotmanageclassroombehaviors.

Developing1:

Thecandidatedescribesmultipleclassroommanagementmodels.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiesforclassroommanagement.

Target:

Thecandidateconsistentlymanagesclassroombehaviors.

2f1.Appliesstandardsforbehaviorequitably,consistently,andinafairmanner.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotshowanunderstandingofhowrulesandstandardsforbehaviormaybeappliedequitably,

Page 15: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page15of25

consistently,andinafairmanner.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstandardsforbehaviorequitably,consistently,andinafairmanner.

Developing2:

Thecandidateappliesstandardsforbehaviorequitably,consistently,andinafairmanner.

Target:

Thecandidatecreatesprocedures,rules,andstandardsofbehaviorandappliesthemconsistently,equitably,andinafairmanner.

2f2.Providesopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenclimate.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotshowanunderstandingofhowtoprovideopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenclimate.

Developing1:

Thecandidatesummarizesexistingwaystoprovideopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenclimate.

Developing2:

Thecandidateformulatesplansforprovidingopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenclimate.

Target:

Thecandidatecreatesopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinions,andimplementstheseopportunitiesinasupportiveandopenclassroomenvironment.

2h.Differentiatesinstructiontoaccommodatethedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents(e.g.,learningstyles,abilities,preferences,needs,gender,raceandculture).

Differentiatedinstructionreferstomethodsteachersemployaccommodateawidevarietyoflearningneeds.Thisincludes

Unacceptable:

Thereisnoevidencethecandidatedifferentiatesinstruction.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaysinwhichinstructionmaybemodifiedtoaccommodatedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiestodifferentiatethelearningenvironmenttoaccommodatethedifferingneedsand

Page 16: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page16of25

differentiatedcontent,processandproduct.

diversityofstudents.

Target:

Thecandidateusesstrategiestodifferentiatethelearningenvironmenttoaccommodatethedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents.

2i.Usesavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

Unacceptable:

Thereisnoevidencethatthecandidateusesavailabletechnologiestosupportstudents’educationalgoals.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

Target:

Thecandidateutilizesavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

3a.Deliverengagingandchallenginglessons.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdeliverlessonsthatareengagingandchallenging.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstrategies(voicemodulation,circulation,questioning,etc.)thatengageandchallengestudents.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiesthatengageandchallengestudents.

Target:

Thecandidatedeliverslessonsthatareengagingandchallengingforallstudents.

3c.Identifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotusestrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Page 17: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page17of25

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavarietyofstrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Target:

Thecandidateusesavarietyofstrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

3d.Modifiesinstructiontorespondtostudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.)

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotmodifyinstructiontorespondtostudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaystomodifyinstructiontorespondtostudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiestomodifyinstructiontorespondtovariedstudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

Target:

Thecandidatemodifiesinstructiontorespondtovariedstudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

3f.Asksquestionstostimulatediscussion(verbaland/orwritten)thatservesdifferentpurposes(e.g.,probingforlearnerunderstanding,helpinglearnersarticulatetheirideasandthinkingprocesses,stimulatingcuriosity,andhelpinglearnerstoquestion).

INTASCStandard8i

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotaskquestionstostimulatediscussion.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesquestionstostimulatediscussion.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsquestionstostimulatediscussion.

Target:

Thecandidateasksquestionstostimulatediscussion.

3g.Appliesavarietyofinstructional Unacceptable:

Page 18: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page18of25

strategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstandingofsubjectmatter.

Thecandidatedoesnotapplyavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Target:

Thecandidateappliesavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

3h.Differentiatesinstructionbasedonanassessmentofdifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents(e.g.,culturallinguistic,SES,disability,etc.)

Unacceptable:

Thecandidateisunabletodifferentiateinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaystodifferentiateinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaystodifferentiateinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

Target:

Thecandidatedifferentiatesinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

3i.Providesimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotprovideimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiespracticesforprovidingimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectspracticesforprovidingimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Target:

Thecandidateprovidesimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Page 19: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page19of25

3j.Utilizesstudentfeedbackcollectedfromformalandinformalformativeandsummativeassessments(e.g.,gradedclasswork/exams,IEPgoalattainmentifappropriate,behavior,verbalexpressions,etc.)tomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotutilizestudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiespracticesforutilizingstudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectspracticesforutilizingstudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Target:

Thecandidateutilizesstudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

4d.Modifiesassessmentandtestingconditionstoaccommodatedifferences,i.e.learningstyles,levelsofknowledge,disabilities,etc.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotmodifyassessmentsand/ortestingconditionstoaccommodatestudentdifferences.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesmethodsformodifyingassessmentsand/ortestingconditionsbasedonastudent’sdifferences.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsmethodsformodifyingassessmentsand/ortestingconditionsbasedondifferenceswithinthestudentpopulation.

Target:

Thecandidatemodifiesassessmentsand/ortestingconditionsbasedondifferenceswithinthestudentpopulation.

4f.Analyzesassessmentinformationusingavailabletechnologytools.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotanalyzeassessmentinformationusingavailabletechnologytools.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavailabletechnologytoolsthatcanbeusedtoanalyzeassessmentinformation.

Page 20: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page20of25

Target:

Thecandidateanalyzesassessmentinformationusingavailabletechnologytools.

5a.Designsprofessionalgoalstoimprovehis/herinstructionalpractice.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdesignprofessionalgoalstoimprovehis/herinstructionalpractice.

Developing1:

Thecandidaterecognizestheimportanceofidentifyingprofessionalgoals.

Developing2:

Thecandidateidentifiesareasofstrengthandweaknessinhis/herinstructionalpractice.

Target:

Thecandidatedesignsprofessionalgoalstoimprovehis/herinstructionalpracticebasedonstudents’needs.

SignatureAssessment#9:CapstoneInstructionalImpactAnalysis(StudentTeaching)Description:Adetailedassignmentdescriptionisavailable.Componentsofthisimpactanalysisinclude:

• UnitPlan• PreandPostAssessment• AnalysisofData• ReportingofData• Reflection

FEAPs2f1,2f2,2h,2i,3a,3c,3d,3f,3g,3h,3i,3j,5a2f1.Appliesstandardsforbehaviorequitably,consistently,andinafairmanner.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotshowanunderstandingofhowrulesandstandardsforbehaviormaybeappliedequitably,consistentlyandinafairmanner.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstandardssupportingsafe,positivelearningenvironments.

Developing2:

Thecandidateappliesstandardsforbehaviorequitably,consistently,andinafairmanner.

Target:

Page 21: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page21of25

Thecandidatecreatesprocedures,rules,andstandardsofbehaviorandappliesthemconsistently,equitably,andinafairmanner.

2f2.Providesopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenclimate.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotshowanunderstandingofhowtoprovideopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenmanner.

Developing1:

Thecandidatesummarizesexistingwaystoprovideopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenmanner.

Developing2:

Thecandidateformulatesplansforprovidingopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenmanner.

Target:

Thecandidateintegratescurrentinformationandcommunicationtechnologies.

2h.Differentiatesinstructiontoaccommodatethedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents(e.g.,learningstyles,abilities,preferences,needs,gender,raceandculture).

Differentiatedinstructionreferstomethodsteachersemployaccommodateawidevarietyoflearningneeds.Thisincludesdifferentiatedcontent,processandproduct.

Unacceptable:

Thereisnoevidencethecandidatedifferentiatesinstruction.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaysinwhichinstructionmaybemodifiedtoaccommodatedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiestodifferentiatethelearningenvironmenttoaccommodatethedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents.

Target:

Thecandidateusesstrategiestodifferentiatethelearningenvironmenttoaccommodatethedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents.

2i.Usesavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

Unacceptable:

Thereisnoevidencethatthecandidateusesavailabletechnologiestosupportstudents’educationalgoals.

Developing1:

Page 22: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page22of25

Thecandidateidentifiesavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiesthatengageandchallengestudents.

Target:

Thecandidateutilizesavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

3a.Deliverengagingandchallenginglessons.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdeliverlessonsthatareengagingandchallenging.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstrategies(voicemodulation,circulation,questioning,etc.)thatengageandchallengestudents.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiesthatengageandchallengestudents.

Target:

Thecandidatedeliverslessonsthatareengagingandchallengingforallstudents.

3c.Identifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotusestrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Developing2:

Candidateselectsavarietyofstrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Target:

Thecandidateusesavarietyofstrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

3d.Modifiesinstructiontorespondtostudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsor

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotmodifyinstructiontorespondtostudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

Page 23: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page23of25

misconceptions,etc.) Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaystomodifyinstructiontorespondtostudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiestomodifyinstructiontorespondtovariedstudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

Target:

Thecandidatemodifiesinstructiontorespondtovariedstudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

3f.Asksquestionstostimulatediscussion(verbaland/orwritten)thatservesdifferentpurposes(e.g.,probingforlearnerunderstanding,helpinglearnersarticulatetheirideasandthinkingprocesses,stimulatingcuriosity,andhelpinglearnerstoquestion).

INTASCStandard8i

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotaskquestionstostimulatediscussion.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesquestionstostimulatediscussion.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsquestionstostimulatediscussion.

Target:

Thecandidateasksquestionstostimulatediscussion.

3g.Appliesavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstandingofsubjectmatter.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotapplyvarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Target:

Thecandidateappliesavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Page 24: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page24of25

3h.Differentiatesinstructionbasedonanassessmentofdifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents(e.g.,culturallinguistic,SES,disability,etc.)

Unacceptable:

Thecandidateisunabletodifferentiateinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaystodifferentiateinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaystodifferentiateinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

Target:

Thecandidatedifferentiatesinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

3i.Providesimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotprovideimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiespracticesforprovidingimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectspracticesforprovidingimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Target:

Thecandidateprovidesimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

3j.Utilizesstudentfeedbackcollectedfromformalandinformalformativeandsummativeassessments(e.g.,gradedclasswork/exams,IEPgoalattainmentifappropriate,behavior,verbalexpressions,etc.)tomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotutilizestudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiespracticesforutilizingstudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectspracticesforutilizingstudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Target:

Page 25: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page25of25

Thecandidateutilizesstudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

5a.Designsprofessionalgoalstoimprovehis/herinstructionalpractice.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdesignprofessionalgoalstoimprovehis/herinstructionalpractice.

Developing1:

Thecandidaterecognizestheimportanceofidentifyingprofessionalgoals.

Developing2:

Thecandidateidentifiesareasofstrengthandweaknessinhis/herinstructionalpractice.

Target:

Thecandidatedesignsprofessionalgoalstoimprovehis/herinstructionalpracticebasedonstudents’needs.

SignatureAssessment#10:SummativeStudentTeachingEvaluationDescription:Unit-widesummativeevaluationofallFEAPspriortotheendofStudentTeaching.EachcandidatemustdemonstrateeachFEAPMeasurableCriteriaattheTargetlevelpriortoreceivingasatisfactorygradeforStudentTeaching.FEAPs:All


Recommended