25
Page 1 of 25 Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature Assessment #1: Early Lesson Plan Description: The teacher candidate will create a developmentally appropriate lesson plan that includes objectives that are clearly written and aligned with appropriate Florida standards; concepts and/or skills that are logically sequenced throughout the lesson; and opportunities for students to demonstrate a variety of applicable skills and competencies within the instructional activities. During the introduction portion of the lesson plan, candidates should describe how they will convey high expectations to all students. FEAPs: 1a, 1b, 1f, 2c FEAP Measurable Indicator Rubric 1a. Aligns instruction with state- adopted standards at the appropriate level of rigor. Unacceptable: The candidate does not align objectives with state-adopted standards. Developing 1: The candidate develops objectives for state-adopted standards. Developing 2: The candidate aligns objectives with state-adopted standards. Target: The candidate aligns objectives with state-adopted standards at appropriate levels of rigor for all students. 1b. Sequences concepts and skills within learning experiences. Unacceptable: The candidate does not sequence concepts and skills to ensure coherence and required. Developing 1: The candidate identifies required major concepts and skills in a targeted learning area. Developing 2: The candidate sequences concepts and skills within lessons in a targeted learning area. Target: The candidate sequences concepts and skills within learning experiences.

Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page1of25

FloridaStateUniversityEducatorPreparationUnit–AssessmentSystem

FEAPSignatureAssessmentDescriptions

SignatureAssessment#1:EarlyLessonPlan

Description:TheteachercandidatewillcreateadevelopmentallyappropriatelessonplanthatincludesobjectivesthatareclearlywrittenandalignedwithappropriateFloridastandards;conceptsand/orskillsthatarelogicallysequencedthroughoutthelesson;andopportunitiesforstudentstodemonstrateavarietyofapplicableskillsandcompetencieswithintheinstructionalactivities.Duringtheintroductionportionofthelessonplan,candidatesshoulddescribehowtheywillconveyhighexpectationstoallstudents.FEAPs:1a,1b,1f,2cFEAPMeasurableIndicatorRubric

1a.Alignsinstructionwithstate-adoptedstandardsattheappropriatelevelofrigor.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotalignobjectiveswithstate-adoptedstandards.

Developing1:

Thecandidatedevelopsobjectivesforstate-adoptedstandards.

Developing2:

Thecandidatealignsobjectiveswithstate-adoptedstandards.

Target:

Thecandidatealignsobjectiveswithstate-adoptedstandardsatappropriatelevelsofrigorforallstudents.

1b.Sequencesconceptsandskillswithinlearningexperiences. Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotsequenceconceptsandskillstoensurecoherenceandrequired.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesrequiredmajorconceptsandskillsinatargetedlearningarea.

Developing2:

Thecandidatesequencesconceptsandskillswithinlessonsinatargetedlearningarea.

Target:

Thecandidatesequencesconceptsandskillswithinlearningexperiences.

Page 2: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page2of25

1f.Developslearningexperiencesthatrequirestudentstodemonstrateavarietyofapplicableskillsandcompetencies.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatecannotdevelopactivitiesthatdemonstrateavarietyofapplicableskillsandcompetencies.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieslearningexperiencesthatallowallstudentstodemonstrateavarietyofapplicableskillsandcompetencies.

Developing2:

Thecandidatedesignslearningexperiencesthatallowallstudentstodemonstrateavarietyofapplicableskillsandcompetencies.

Target:

Thecandidatedevelopslearningexperiencesthatallowallstudentstodemonstrateavarietyofapplicableskillsand/orcompetencies.

2c.Conveyshighexpectationstoallstudents. Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotconveyhighexpectations.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesvariousmethodsforconveyinghighexpectations.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsappropriatestrategiesforconveyinghighexpectations.

Target:

Thecandidateconsistentlyconveyshighexpectations.

SignatureAssessment#2:EarlyTeachingPhilosophyDescription:Teachercandidateswillwriteateachingphilosophybasedontheirbeliefsaboutteachingandlearning.Withinthephilosophy,teachercandidatesmustaddresshowtheywouldaddressvariouscultural,linguistic,andfamilybackgrounddifferencesintheirclassrooms;describeappropriateinformationandcommunicationtechnologiestheywoulduse;andreflectonwaystheycanapplycontentlearnedandimprovefuturepractice.Finishedproductsmustreflectteachercandidates’abilitytoeffectivelycommunicateideas.FEAPs:2d,2e,2g,5e1,5e2,5f2d.Respectsstudents’culturallinguisticandfamilybackground. Unacceptable:

Page 3: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page3of25

Thecandidatedoesnotdemonstraterespectforstudents’cultural,linguistic,orfamilybackground.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstrategiesfordemonstratingrespectforvariousstudentcultural,linguistic,andfamilybackgrounddifferences.

Developing2:

Thecandidate’swrittenandverbalcommunicationisconsistentlyclearandacceptable.

Target:

Thecandidatemodelsclear,acceptableoralandwrittencommunicationskillstostudents.

2e.Modelsclear,acceptableoralandwrittencommunicationskills Unacceptable:

Thecandidatefailstouseclear,acceptablecommunicationskills.

Developing1:

Thecandidateinconsistentlydemonstratesclearandacceptablewrittenandverbalcommunicationskills.

Developing2:

Thecandidate’swrittenandverbalcommunicationisconsistentlyclearandacceptable.

Target:

Thecandidatemodelsclear,acceptableoralandwrittencommunicationskillstostudents.

2g.Integratescurrentinformationandcommunicationtechnologies.

Currentinformationandcommunicationtechnologies:

Districttechnologies,i.e.SmartBoards,software

Technologyforpedagogy

Unacceptable:

Thereisnoevidencethecandidateusescurrentinformationandcommunicationtechnologiesforinstruction.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiescurrentinformationandcommunicationtechnologies.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectstheappropriateinformationandcommunicationtechnologies.

Target:

Thecandidateintegratescurrentinformationandcommunicationtechnologies.

Page 4: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page4of25

5e1.Appliesinformationobtainedfromprofessionallearningexperiencestohis/herownneedsandtheneedsoflearners,school,andsystem.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotapplyinformationobtainedfromprofessionallearningexperiencestohis/herownneedsandtheneedsoflearners,school,andsystem.

Developing1:

ThecandidateIdentifieswaystocollaborativelyworkwithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaystocollaborativelyworkwithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

Target:

Thecandidateworkscollaborativelywithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

5e2.Engagesinreflectionbyanalyzingdecisionsmadeandarticulatingwaystoimprovefuturepractice.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotengageinreflection.

Developing1:

Thecandidateengagesinreflectionbyanalyzingdecisionsmade.

Developing2:

Thecandidateengagesinreflectionbyanalyzingdecisionsmadeandrecognizingtheneedtoimprovefuturepractice.

Target:

Thecandidateengagesinreflectionbyanalyzingdecisionsmadeandarticulatingwaystoimprovefuturepractice.

5f.Implementsknowledgeandskillslearnedinprofessionaldevelopmentintheteachingandlearningprocess

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotuseavarietyofstrategiestoanalyzeandreflectonhis/herpracticeandforadaptions/adjustments.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesavarietyofstrategiestoanalyzeandreflectonhis/herpracticeandoradaptions/adjustments.

Page 5: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page5of25

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavarietyofstrategiestoanalyzeandreflectonhis/herpracticeandforadaptions/adjustments.

Target:

Thecandidateusesavarietyofstrategiestoanalyzeandreflectonhis/herpracticeandforadaptions/adjustments.

SignatureAssessment#3:Unit-WideEthicsModuleAssignmentDescription:Candidateswillcompleteaprofessionalresponsibilityandethicalconductmodulewithintheirfirstsemester.Thegoalistohelpcandidatesbetterunderstandethicsineducationaswellasthehighlevelofprofessionalismrequiredbythefield.Theunit-widemodulewillincludethefollowingcomponents:CodeofEthicsandPrinciplesofProfessionalConducttopre-professionalandpersonalsituations;statutorygroundsandproceduresfordisciplinaryactionandpenaltiesthatcanbeimposedbytheEPCagainstcertificateholdersaswellastheappealsprocessavailable;legalresponsibilitiesandproceduresforreportingabuse,neglect,andothersignsofdistress;appropriateuseofstudentrecords;andpoliciesandproceduresrelatedtothesafeandethicaluseoftechnology.FEAPs:6a,6b,6c,6d6a.ApplytheCodeofEthicsandPrincipalsofProfessionalConducttopre-professionalandpersonalsituations.

Unacceptable:

ThecandidatedoesnotapplytheCodeofEthicsandPrincipalsofProfessionalConducttopre-professionalandpersonalsituations.

Developing1:

ThecandidateidentifiesspecificethicandprinciplesintheCodeofEthicsandPrincipalsofProfessionalConduct.

Developing2:

ThecandidateidentifieshowtoapplytheCodeofEthicsandPrincipalsofProfessionalConducttopre-professionalandpersonalsituations.

Target:

ThecandidateappliestheCodeofEthicsandPrincipalsofProfessionalConducttopre-professionalandpersonalsituations.

6b.Identifystatutorygroundsandproceduresfordisciplinaryaction,thepenaltiesthatcanbeimposedbytheEPCagainstacertificateholder,

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotidentifystatutorygroundsandproceduresfordisciplinaryaction,thepenaltiesthatcanbeimposedbytheEPCagainstacertificateholderandtheappealsprocessavailabletotheindividual.

Page 6: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page6of25

andtheappealsprocessavailabletotheindividual. Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstatutorygroundsandproceduresfordisciplinaryaction,butdoesnotcorrectlyidentifypenaltiesthatcanbeimposedortheappealsprocessavailabletoindividuals.

Developing2:

Thecandidateidentifiesstatutorygroundsandproceduresfordisciplinaryactionandpenaltiesthatcanbeimposed,butdoesnotcorrectlyidentifytheappealsprocessavailabletoindividuals.

Target:

Thecandidateidentifiesstatutorygroundsandproceduresfordisciplinaryaction,thepenaltiesthatcanbeimposedbytheEPCagainstacertificateholderandtheappealsprocessavailabletotheindividual.

6c.Applieslawsrelatedtolearners’rightsandteacherresponsibilities,e.g.educationalequity,appropriateeducationforlearnerswithdisabilities,confidentially,privacy,appropriatetreatmentoflearners,reportinginsituationsrelatedtopossiblechildabuse

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotapplylawsrelatedtolearners’rightsandteacherresponsibilities,e.g.educationalequity,appropriateeducationforlearnerswithdisabilities,confidentiality,privacy,appropriatetreatmentoflearners,reportinginsituationsrelatedtopossiblechildabuse.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiessomeofthelawsrelatedtolearners’rightsandteacherresponsibilities,e.g.educationalequity,appropriateeducationforlearnerswithdisabilities,confidentially,privacy,appropriatetreatmentoflearners,reportinginsituationsrelatedtopossiblechildabuse.

Developing2:

Thecandidateidentifieslawsrelatedtolearners’rightsandteacherresponsibilities,e.g.educationalequity,appropriateeducationforlearnerswithdisabilities,confidentiality,privacy,appropriatetreatmentoflearners,reportinginsituationsrelatedtopossiblechildabuseinplanning

Target:

Thecandidateapplieslawsrelatedtolearners’rightsandteacherresponsibilities,e.g.educationalequity,appropriateeducationforlearnerswithdisabilities,confidentiality,privacy,appropriatetreatmentoflearners,reportinginsituationsrelatedtopossiblechildabuseinstudentteaching.

6d.Appliespoliciesandproceduresforthesafeandethicaluseoftechnologies.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotapplypoliciesandproceduresforthesafeandethicaluseoftechnologies.

Developing1:

Page 7: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page7of25

Thecandidateidentifiespoliciesandproceduresforthesafeandethicaluseoftechnologies.

Developing2:

Thecandidateidentifiesallofthepoliciesandproceduresforthesafeandethicaluseoftechnologies

Target:

Thecandidateappliespoliciesandproceduresforthesafeandethicaluseoftechnologies.

SignatureAssessment#4:ClassroomManagementAssignmentDescription:Teachercandidateswillcreateaplanforequitablyorganizingandallocatingresources,aswellascommunicatingwithhome.Areasoftheplancanincludeclassroomarrangement,rules,procedures,andcommunicationwithhome.FEAPs:2a1,2a2,5d

2a1.Thecandidateequitablyorganizesresources.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotorganizeresourcesequitably.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesmultiplewaystoorganizeresourcesequitably.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaystoorganizeresourcesequitably.

Target:

Thecandidateequitablyallocatesresources.

2a2.Thecandidateequitablyallocatesresources.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotequitablyallocateresources.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesmultiplewaystoallocateresourcesequitably.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaystoorganizeresourcesequitably.

Target:

Page 8: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page8of25

Thecandidateequitablyorganizesresources.

5d.Collaborateswiththehome,schoolandlargercommunitiestofostercommunicationandtosupportstudentlearningandcontinuousimprovement.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotcollaborativelyworkwithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

Developing1:

ThecandidateIdentifieswaystocollaborativelyworkwithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaystocollaborativelyworkwithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

Target:

Thecandidateworkscollaborativelywithlearnersandtheirfamiliestoestablishexpectationsandongoingcommunicationthatsupportlearnerdevelopmentandachievement.

SignatureAssessment#5:AssessmentCaseStudyAssignmentDescription:Givenasetofstudentdatafrommultipleassessments,thecandidatewillanalyzedatatodiagnosestudents’learningneedsandtoinformthedevelopmentoflessonplans.Thecandidatewilluseavarietyofassessmenttoolstomonitorstudentprogressandtoinformthemodificationofinstruction.Thecandidatewilldevelopaplanforcommunicatingassessmentoutcomeswithstudentsandtheircaregivers.FEAPs:1e,4a1,4a2,4c,4e1e.Usediagnosticstudentdatatoplanlessons. Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotidentifyorusesourcesofdiagnosticstudentdatatoplanlessons.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesdiagnosticstudentdatathatareconsistentwithdevelopmentandlearningtheoriesforthegrade/agetoplanlessons.

Developing2:

Thecandidateinterpretsdiagnosticstudentdatathatisconsistentwithdevelopmentandlearningtheoriesattheage/grade-appropriatelevelofrigortohelpplanlessons.

Target:

Thecandidateappliesdiagnosticstudentdatathatisconsistentwithdevelopmentandlearningtheoriesatthe

Page 9: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page9of25

appropriatelevelofrigortoplanlessons.

4a1.Analyzesavarietyofassessmentdatatodiagnosestudentlearningneeds.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotanalyzeassessmentdata.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstudentlearningneedsbasedonanalyzedassessmentdata.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsanalyzedassessmentdatatodiagnosestudentlearningneeds.

Target:

Thecandidateanalyzesdatafromavarietyofsourcestodiagnosestudentlearningneeds.

4a2.Appliesdatafrommultipleassessmentstomodifyorinforminstruction

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotapplyassessmentdatatomodifyorinforminstruction.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesassessmentdatathatcanbeusedtomodifyorinforminstruction.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsassessmentdatathatcanbeusedtomodifyorinforminstruction.

Target:

Thecandidateappliesdatafrommultipleassessmentstomodifyorinforminstruction.

4c.Usesavarietyofassessmenttoolstomonitorstudentprogress,i.e.learninggains,masteryofcontent,studentgaps,etc.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotuseavarietyofassessmenttoolstomonitorstudentprogress.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesavarietyofassessmenttoolstomonitorstudentprogress.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavarietyofassessmenttoolstomonitorstudentprogress.

Page 10: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page10of25

Target:

Thecandidateusesavarietyofformativeandsummativeassessmenttoolstomonitorstudentprogress.

4e.Communicatesoutcomesofassessmentdatawithstudentsandstudents’caregivers.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotcommunicatetheoutcomesofassessmentdatawithstudentsandcaregivers.

Developing1:

Thecandidatedescribeshowoutcomeswillbecommunicatedtostudentsandcaregivers.

Developing2:

Thecandidatedesignsmethodsforcommunicatingoutcomesofstudentassessmentdatatostudentsandcaregivers.

Target:

Thecandidatecommunicatestheoutcomesofstudentassessmentdatawiththestudentsandcaregivers.

SignatureAssessment#6:ESOLLessonPlanDescription:CandidateswillcreateadetailedcontentbasedlessonplanforaclassthatcontainsbothEnglishandnon-Englishspeakingpupils.Thelessonplan(atminimum)mustexemplifystudentmasterybyaddressingthefollowing:learninggoalsandobjectives(bothcontentandlanguage);supportoflearninggoals,outcomesandobjectivesviaappropriatelearningtasksanddelivery;integrationofcontentwithotherdisciplinesandlifeexperiences;appropriateformativeassessmentstomonitorlearning;andassessments(formative&summative)thatalignwithlearningobjectivesanddemonstratemasteryoflearningobjectives.FEAPs:4b1,4b2,1c,1d,3e4b1.Designsformativeassessmentsthataligntolearningobjectives. Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdesignformativeassessmentsthatmatchlearningobjectives.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesformativeassessmentsthatmatchlearningobjectives.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsformativeassessmentsthatmatchlearningobjectives.

Target:

Thecandidatedesignsformativeassessmentsthatmatchlearningobjectives.

Page 11: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page11of25

4b2.Designssummativeassessmentsthatallowstudentstodemonstratemasteryoflearningobjectives.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdesignsummativeassessmentsthatallowstudentstodemonstratemasteroflearningobjectives.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiessummativeassessmentsthatallowforstudentstodemonstratemasteryoflearningobjectives.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectssummativeassessmentsthatallowforstudentstodemonstratemasteryoflearningobjectives.

Target:

Thecandidatedesignssummativeassessmentsthatallowstudentstodemonstratemasteryoflearningobjectives.

1c.Designsinstructionforstudentstoachievemastery.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdesignlessonsorunitofinstructionforalllearnerstoachievemastery.

Developing1:

Thecandidatedesignslesson(s)thatenablealllearnerstoachievemastery.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectslessons(s)thatenablealllearnerstoachievemastery.

Target:

Thecandidatedesignsaunitofinstructionthatenableslearnerstoachievemastery.

1d.Selectsappropriateformativeassessmentstomonitorlearning.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotselectappropriateformativeassessmentstomonitorlearning.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesappropriateformativeassessmentstomonitorlearning.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsappropriateformativeassessmentstomonitorlearning.

Page 12: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page12of25

Target:

Thecandidateintegratesmultipleformativeassessmentswithinlessonplanstomonitorlearning.

3e.Relateandintegratethesubjectmatterwithotherdisciplinesandlifeexperiences.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotintegratesubjectmatterwithlearners’lifeexperiencesand/orotherdisciplines.

Developing1:

Thecandidaterelatessubjectmatterwithlearners’lifeexperiencesand/orotherdisciplines.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsmethodsforintegratingsubjectmatterwithlearners’lifeexperiencesand/orotherdisciplines.

Target:

Thecandidateintegratessubjectmatterwithlearners’lifeexperiencesand/orotherdisciplines.

SignatureAssessment#7:ContentAreaLiteracyLessonPlanDescription:Inthislessonplan,candidateswillincludeapplicationofappropriatecontentarealiteracystrategiesandprovidestudentswithopportunitiestoapplysubjectmatterandtoexplainaswellasjustifytheirthinkingthroughwrittenand/ororalexpression.Candidateswillthenapplyavarietyofdataindependentlyaswellaswithcolleaguestoevaluatestudents’learningoutcomes,adjustplanning,andcontinuouslyimprovelessoneffectiveness.FEAPs:3b1,3b2,3b3,5b,5c3b1.Appliesappropriatecontentarealiteracystrategies. Unacceptable:

Thecandidateisunabletoapplycontentarealiteracystrategies.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiescontentarealiteracystrategiesthatsupportstudentunderstanding.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectscontentarealiteracystrategiesthatsupportstudentunderstanding.

Target:

Thecandidateappliescontentarealiteracystrategiesininstructionthatsupportstudentunderstanding.

3b2.Providesstudentsopportunitiestoexplainandjustifytheirthinkingthroughwritten

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotprovideopportunitiesforstudentstoexplainandjustifytheirthinking.

Page 13: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page13of25

and/ororalexpression.

Exittickets

Questionstoaskstudents

EssentialQuestion

Levelofunderstandingthroughselection,communicationdevices,manipulatives,pictureboards.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesopportunitiesforstudentstoexplainandjustifytheirthinking.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsopportunitiesforavarietyofstudentstoexplainandjustifytheirthinking.

Target:

Thecandidateprovidesdifferentiatedopportunitiesforavarietyofstudentstoexplainandjustifytheirthinking.

3b3.Providesopportunitiesforstudentstoapplysubjectmatter.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotprovideopportunitiesforstudenttoapplysubjectmatter.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaysforstudentstoapplysubjectmatter.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaysforavarietyofstudentstoapplysubjectmatter.

Target:

Thecandidateprovidesopportunitiesforavarietyofstudentstoapplysubjectmatter.

5b.Usesdatainformedresearchtoimproveinstructionandstudentachievement.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotusedatainformedresearchtoimproveinstructionandstudentachievement.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesmethodsforimprovinginstructionbasedondatainformedresearch.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsmethodsforimprovinginstructionbasedondatainformedresearch.

Target:

Thecandidateappliesmethodsforimprovinginstructionbasedondatainformedresearch.

5c.Appliesavarietyofdata, Unacceptable:

Page 14: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page14of25

independentlyandcollaboratively,foruseintheinstructionalprocess.

Thecandidatedoesnotuseavarietyofdataintheinstructionalprocess.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesavarietydataforuseintheinstructionalprocess.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavarietyofdataforuseintheinstructionalprocess.

Target:

Thecandidateappliesavarietyofdata,independentlyandcollaboratively,foruseintheinstructionalprocess.

SignatureAssessment#8:FieldExperienceInstructionalImpactAnalysisDescription:Adetailedassignmentdescriptionisavailable.Componentsofthisimpactanalysisinclude:

• DesignUnitPlano TeachaMinimumof2Lessonso ClassroomTeacherEvaluationForm(2Lessons)

• PreandPostAssessment• AnalysisofData• ReportingofData• Reflection

FEAPs:2b,2f1,2f2,2h,2i,3a,3c,3d,3f,3g,3h,3i,3j,4d,4f,5a2b.Managesindividualandclassbehaviorsthroughawell-plannedmanagementsystem.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotmanageclassroombehaviors.

Developing1:

Thecandidatedescribesmultipleclassroommanagementmodels.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiesforclassroommanagement.

Target:

Thecandidateconsistentlymanagesclassroombehaviors.

2f1.Appliesstandardsforbehaviorequitably,consistently,andinafairmanner.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotshowanunderstandingofhowrulesandstandardsforbehaviormaybeappliedequitably,

Page 15: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page15of25

consistently,andinafairmanner.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstandardsforbehaviorequitably,consistently,andinafairmanner.

Developing2:

Thecandidateappliesstandardsforbehaviorequitably,consistently,andinafairmanner.

Target:

Thecandidatecreatesprocedures,rules,andstandardsofbehaviorandappliesthemconsistently,equitably,andinafairmanner.

2f2.Providesopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenclimate.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotshowanunderstandingofhowtoprovideopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenclimate.

Developing1:

Thecandidatesummarizesexistingwaystoprovideopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenclimate.

Developing2:

Thecandidateformulatesplansforprovidingopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenclimate.

Target:

Thecandidatecreatesopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinions,andimplementstheseopportunitiesinasupportiveandopenclassroomenvironment.

2h.Differentiatesinstructiontoaccommodatethedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents(e.g.,learningstyles,abilities,preferences,needs,gender,raceandculture).

Differentiatedinstructionreferstomethodsteachersemployaccommodateawidevarietyoflearningneeds.Thisincludes

Unacceptable:

Thereisnoevidencethecandidatedifferentiatesinstruction.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaysinwhichinstructionmaybemodifiedtoaccommodatedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiestodifferentiatethelearningenvironmenttoaccommodatethedifferingneedsand

Page 16: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page16of25

differentiatedcontent,processandproduct.

diversityofstudents.

Target:

Thecandidateusesstrategiestodifferentiatethelearningenvironmenttoaccommodatethedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents.

2i.Usesavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

Unacceptable:

Thereisnoevidencethatthecandidateusesavailabletechnologiestosupportstudents’educationalgoals.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

Target:

Thecandidateutilizesavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

3a.Deliverengagingandchallenginglessons.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdeliverlessonsthatareengagingandchallenging.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstrategies(voicemodulation,circulation,questioning,etc.)thatengageandchallengestudents.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiesthatengageandchallengestudents.

Target:

Thecandidatedeliverslessonsthatareengagingandchallengingforallstudents.

3c.Identifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotusestrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Page 17: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page17of25

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavarietyofstrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Target:

Thecandidateusesavarietyofstrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

3d.Modifiesinstructiontorespondtostudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.)

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotmodifyinstructiontorespondtostudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaystomodifyinstructiontorespondtostudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiestomodifyinstructiontorespondtovariedstudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

Target:

Thecandidatemodifiesinstructiontorespondtovariedstudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

3f.Asksquestionstostimulatediscussion(verbaland/orwritten)thatservesdifferentpurposes(e.g.,probingforlearnerunderstanding,helpinglearnersarticulatetheirideasandthinkingprocesses,stimulatingcuriosity,andhelpinglearnerstoquestion).

INTASCStandard8i

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotaskquestionstostimulatediscussion.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesquestionstostimulatediscussion.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsquestionstostimulatediscussion.

Target:

Thecandidateasksquestionstostimulatediscussion.

3g.Appliesavarietyofinstructional Unacceptable:

Page 18: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page18of25

strategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstandingofsubjectmatter.

Thecandidatedoesnotapplyavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Target:

Thecandidateappliesavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

3h.Differentiatesinstructionbasedonanassessmentofdifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents(e.g.,culturallinguistic,SES,disability,etc.)

Unacceptable:

Thecandidateisunabletodifferentiateinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaystodifferentiateinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaystodifferentiateinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

Target:

Thecandidatedifferentiatesinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

3i.Providesimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotprovideimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiespracticesforprovidingimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectspracticesforprovidingimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Target:

Thecandidateprovidesimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Page 19: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page19of25

3j.Utilizesstudentfeedbackcollectedfromformalandinformalformativeandsummativeassessments(e.g.,gradedclasswork/exams,IEPgoalattainmentifappropriate,behavior,verbalexpressions,etc.)tomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotutilizestudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiespracticesforutilizingstudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectspracticesforutilizingstudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Target:

Thecandidateutilizesstudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

4d.Modifiesassessmentandtestingconditionstoaccommodatedifferences,i.e.learningstyles,levelsofknowledge,disabilities,etc.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotmodifyassessmentsand/ortestingconditionstoaccommodatestudentdifferences.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesmethodsformodifyingassessmentsand/ortestingconditionsbasedonastudent’sdifferences.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsmethodsformodifyingassessmentsand/ortestingconditionsbasedondifferenceswithinthestudentpopulation.

Target:

Thecandidatemodifiesassessmentsand/ortestingconditionsbasedondifferenceswithinthestudentpopulation.

4f.Analyzesassessmentinformationusingavailabletechnologytools.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotanalyzeassessmentinformationusingavailabletechnologytools.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavailabletechnologytoolsthatcanbeusedtoanalyzeassessmentinformation.

Page 20: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page20of25

Target:

Thecandidateanalyzesassessmentinformationusingavailabletechnologytools.

5a.Designsprofessionalgoalstoimprovehis/herinstructionalpractice.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdesignprofessionalgoalstoimprovehis/herinstructionalpractice.

Developing1:

Thecandidaterecognizestheimportanceofidentifyingprofessionalgoals.

Developing2:

Thecandidateidentifiesareasofstrengthandweaknessinhis/herinstructionalpractice.

Target:

Thecandidatedesignsprofessionalgoalstoimprovehis/herinstructionalpracticebasedonstudents’needs.

SignatureAssessment#9:CapstoneInstructionalImpactAnalysis(StudentTeaching)Description:Adetailedassignmentdescriptionisavailable.Componentsofthisimpactanalysisinclude:

• UnitPlan• PreandPostAssessment• AnalysisofData• ReportingofData• Reflection

FEAPs2f1,2f2,2h,2i,3a,3c,3d,3f,3g,3h,3i,3j,5a2f1.Appliesstandardsforbehaviorequitably,consistently,andinafairmanner.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotshowanunderstandingofhowrulesandstandardsforbehaviormaybeappliedequitably,consistentlyandinafairmanner.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstandardssupportingsafe,positivelearningenvironments.

Developing2:

Thecandidateappliesstandardsforbehaviorequitably,consistently,andinafairmanner.

Target:

Page 21: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page21of25

Thecandidatecreatesprocedures,rules,andstandardsofbehaviorandappliesthemconsistently,equitably,andinafairmanner.

2f2.Providesopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenclimate.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotshowanunderstandingofhowtoprovideopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenmanner.

Developing1:

Thecandidatesummarizesexistingwaystoprovideopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenmanner.

Developing2:

Thecandidateformulatesplansforprovidingopportunitiesforstudentstosharediverseperspectives,experiences,andopinionsinasupportiveandopenmanner.

Target:

Thecandidateintegratescurrentinformationandcommunicationtechnologies.

2h.Differentiatesinstructiontoaccommodatethedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents(e.g.,learningstyles,abilities,preferences,needs,gender,raceandculture).

Differentiatedinstructionreferstomethodsteachersemployaccommodateawidevarietyoflearningneeds.Thisincludesdifferentiatedcontent,processandproduct.

Unacceptable:

Thereisnoevidencethecandidatedifferentiatesinstruction.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaysinwhichinstructionmaybemodifiedtoaccommodatedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiestodifferentiatethelearningenvironmenttoaccommodatethedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents.

Target:

Thecandidateusesstrategiestodifferentiatethelearningenvironmenttoaccommodatethedifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents.

2i.Usesavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

Unacceptable:

Thereisnoevidencethatthecandidateusesavailabletechnologiestosupportstudents’educationalgoals.

Developing1:

Page 22: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page22of25

Thecandidateidentifiesavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiesthatengageandchallengestudents.

Target:

Thecandidateutilizesavailableassistivetechnologiestosupportstudentstoachieveeducationalgoals.

3a.Deliverengagingandchallenginglessons.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdeliverlessonsthatareengagingandchallenging.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstrategies(voicemodulation,circulation,questioning,etc.)thatengageandchallengestudents.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiesthatengageandchallengestudents.

Target:

Thecandidatedeliverslessonsthatareengagingandchallengingforallstudents.

3c.Identifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotusestrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesstrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Developing2:

Candidateselectsavarietyofstrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

Target:

Thecandidateusesavarietyofstrategiestoidentifygapsinstudents’subjectmatterknowledge.

3d.Modifiesinstructiontorespondtostudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsor

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotmodifyinstructiontorespondtostudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

Page 23: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page23of25

misconceptions,etc.) Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaystomodifyinstructiontorespondtostudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsstrategiestomodifyinstructiontorespondtovariedstudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

Target:

Thecandidatemodifiesinstructiontorespondtovariedstudentneeds(e.g.,gapsinknowledge,preconceptionsormisconceptions,etc.).

3f.Asksquestionstostimulatediscussion(verbaland/orwritten)thatservesdifferentpurposes(e.g.,probingforlearnerunderstanding,helpinglearnersarticulatetheirideasandthinkingprocesses,stimulatingcuriosity,andhelpinglearnerstoquestion).

INTASCStandard8i

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotaskquestionstostimulatediscussion.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesquestionstostimulatediscussion.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsquestionstostimulatediscussion.

Target:

Thecandidateasksquestionstostimulatediscussion.

3g.Appliesavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstandingofsubjectmatter.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotapplyvarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiesavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectsavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Target:

Thecandidateappliesavarietyofinstructionalstrategiesandresourcestopromotestudentunderstanding.

Page 24: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page24of25

3h.Differentiatesinstructionbasedonanassessmentofdifferingneedsanddiversityofstudents(e.g.,culturallinguistic,SES,disability,etc.)

Unacceptable:

Thecandidateisunabletodifferentiateinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifieswaystodifferentiateinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectswaystodifferentiateinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

Target:

Thecandidatedifferentiatesinstructionbasedonanassessmentofstudentneeds.

3i.Providesimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotprovideimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiespracticesforprovidingimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectspracticesforprovidingimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

Target:

Thecandidateprovidesimmediateandspecificfeedbacktopromotestudentunderstanding.

3j.Utilizesstudentfeedbackcollectedfromformalandinformalformativeandsummativeassessments(e.g.,gradedclasswork/exams,IEPgoalattainmentifappropriate,behavior,verbalexpressions,etc.)tomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotutilizestudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Developing1:

Thecandidateidentifiespracticesforutilizingstudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Developing2:

Thecandidateselectspracticesforutilizingstudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

Target:

Page 25: Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit ... · Florida State University Educator Preparation Unit – Assessment System FEAP Signature Assessment Descriptions Signature

Page25of25

Thecandidateutilizesstudentfeedbacktomonitorandadjustinstruction.

5a.Designsprofessionalgoalstoimprovehis/herinstructionalpractice.

Unacceptable:

Thecandidatedoesnotdesignprofessionalgoalstoimprovehis/herinstructionalpractice.

Developing1:

Thecandidaterecognizestheimportanceofidentifyingprofessionalgoals.

Developing2:

Thecandidateidentifiesareasofstrengthandweaknessinhis/herinstructionalpractice.

Target:

Thecandidatedesignsprofessionalgoalstoimprovehis/herinstructionalpracticebasedonstudents’needs.

SignatureAssessment#10:SummativeStudentTeachingEvaluationDescription:Unit-widesummativeevaluationofallFEAPspriortotheendofStudentTeaching.EachcandidatemustdemonstrateeachFEAPMeasurableCriteriaattheTargetlevelpriortoreceivingasatisfactorygradeforStudentTeaching.FEAPs:All