Download pdf - First Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey: Net satisfaction ... · Pakikipag-ugnayan sa ibang bansa (Foreign relations) 8. Pagpupuksa ng katiwalian at pangungurakot sa gobyerno (Eradicating

1st Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey

SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 1 of 17

52 Malingap St., Sikatuna Village, Quezon City

Website: www.sws.org.ph

Tel: 924-4456, 924-4465

Fax: 920-2181

pr20190503 - Satisfaction with National Admin Overall and on Issues (media release).docx

First Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey:

Net satisfaction rating of the National Administration

rises to record-high “Excellent” +72

• “Excellent” on 1 subject, “Very Good” on 2, “Good” on 7, “Moderate” on 1

• “Excellent” in Mindanao and the Visayas, “Very Good” in Balance Luzon

and Metro Manila

Social Weather Stations

The First Quarter 2019 Social Weather Survey, done on March 28-31, 2019, found 81% of adult

Filipinos satisfied, 10% neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and 9% dissatisfied with the general performance

of the current National Administration, for a new record-high net satisfaction rating of +72 (% satisfied

minus % dissatisfied), classified by SWS as excellent.

This is 6 points above the very good +66 (76% satisfied, 9% dissatisfied, correctly rounded) in

December 2018, and 2 points above the previous record of excellent +70 in December 2017 [Chart 1;

Table 1].

The SWS terminology for net satisfaction ratings is as follows: +70 and above, “excellent”; +50

to +69, “very good”; +30 to +49, “good”; +10 to +29, “moderate”, +9 to –9, “neutral”; –10 to –29,

“poor”; –30 to –49, “bad”; –50 to –69, “very bad”; –70 and below, “execrable”. SWS considers the

movement from one classification to another as either an "upgrade" or "downgrade”.

“Excellent” on 1 subject, “Very Good” on 2, “Good” on 7, “Moderate” on 1

Out of 11 specific performance subjects rated, net satisfaction ratings of the Duterte

Administration were excellent on 1 subject, very good on 2 subjects, good on 7 subjects, and moderate on

1 subject. SWS calls this its Governance Report Card [Tables 2 and 3].

The net satisfaction rating of the National Administration was excellent on Helping the poor (a

new record-high +72) [Chart 2].

It was very good on: Reconstructing Marawi City (+58) and Fighting terrorism (+58) [Charts 3

and 4].

http://www.sws.org.ph/


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 2 of 17

It was good on: Fighting crimes (+48), Reconciling with communist rebels (a new record-high

+45), Reconciling with Muslim rebels (+44), Eradicating graft and corruption (+41), Foreign relations

(+41), Defending Philippine sovereignty in the West Philippines Sea (+40), and Ensuring that no family

will ever be hungry (+37) [Charts 5 to 11].

It was moderate on Fighting inflation (+22) [Chart 12].

The satisfaction rating of the general performance of the National Administration is based on a

single question, and is not an average of answers to separate questions on specific subjects. The general

rating is repeated every quarter, whereas only a core of the specific subject-ratings are repeated. Subjects

are included or excluded depending on their contemporary salience.

“Excellent” in Mindanao and the Visayas, “Very Good” in Balance Luzon and Metro Manila

The 5-point rise in the National Administration’s overall net satisfaction rating was due to

increases in all areas.

It rose from very good to excellent in the Visayas, up by 11 points from +63 in December 2018 to

+74 in March 2019 [Chart 13; Table 4].

It stayed excellent in Mindanao, up by 6 points from +75 in December to +81 in March.

It stayed very good in Balance Luzon, up by 3 points from +65 in December to +68 in March.

It also stayed very good in Metro Manila, up by 5 points from +60 in December to +65 in March.

“Excellent” in both urban and rural areas

Rural net satisfaction with the National Administration rose from very good to excellent, up by 7

points from +65 in December to +72 in March.

Urban net satisfaction also rose from very good to excellent, up by 3 points from +68 in December

to +71 in March.

“Excellent” in classes ABC and D; “Very Good” in class E

Net satisfaction with the National Administration rose from very good to excellent in class D or

the masa, up by 7 points from +65 in December to +72 in March [Chart 14; Tables 5 and 6].

It stayed excellent in class ABC, hardly moving from +72 in December to +73 in March.

However, it declined from excellent to very good in class E, down by 2 points from +70 in

December to +68 in March.

By sex, it rose from very good to excellent among men, up by 4 points from +69 to +73, and among

women, up by 7 points from +64 to +71.


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 3 of 17

By age group, it rose from very good to excellent among the 18-24 year olds, up by 16 points from

+64 to +80, among the 35-44 year olds, up by 8 points from +67 to +75, and among the 45-54 year olds,

up by 7 points from +68 to +75.

It stayed very good among the 55 year olds and above, up by 4 points from +63 in December to

+67 in March.

However, it declined from excellent to very good among the 25-34 year olds, down by 4 points

from +71 in December to +67 in March.

By educational level, net satisfaction with the National Administration stayed excellent among

college graduates, up by 4 points from +73 in December to +77 in March.

It rose from very good to excellent among elementary graduates, up by 6 points from +67 to +73,

and among high school graduates, up by 6 points from +65 to +71.

It stayed very good among non-elementary graduates, up by 4 points from +64 in December to

+68 in March.

National Administration’s net rating improves on 2 subjects, steady on 9

The March 2019 survey found the National Administration’s net satisfaction rating up by one

grade on 2 specific subjects, and steady on 9 others, compared to when they were last surveyed.

The National Administration’s net rating rose by one grade from very good to excellent on Helping

the poor, up by 4 points from +68 in December 2018 to a new record-high +72 in March 2019.

It stayed very good on Fighting terrorism, up by 3 points from +55 in December to +58 in March.

It also stayed very good on Reconstructing Marawi City, although down by 2 points from +60 in

December to +58 in March.

It rose from moderate to good on Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry, up by 9 points from

+28 in December to +37 in March.

It stayed good on 6 specific subjects: Fighting crimes, up by 4 points from +44 to +48, Reconciling

with communist rebels, up by 6 points from +39 to a new record-high +45, Reconciling with Muslim rebels,

hardly moving from +43 to +44, Eradicating graft and corruption, hardly moving from +42 to +41,

Foreign relations, up by 3 points from +38 to +41, and Defending Philippine sovereignty in the West

Philippine Sea, unchanged at +40.

It stayed moderate on Fighting inflation, up by 8 points from +14 in December to +22 to March.


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 4 of 17

Survey background

The March 2019 Social Weather Survey was conducted from March 28-31, 2019 using face-to-

face interviews of 1,440 adults (18 years old and above) nationwide: 360 each in Balance Luzon, Metro

Manila, the Visayas, and Mindanao (sampling error margins of ±2.6% for national percentages, and ±5%

each for Balance Luzon, Metro Manila, the Visayas, and Mindanao).

The area estimates were weighted by the Philippine Statistics Authority medium-population

projections for 2019 to obtain the national estimates.

The quarterly Social Weather Survey items on public satisfaction with the general performance of

the National Administration, and its performance on specific subjects, are non-commissioned. These items

are included on SWS's own initiative and released as a public service.

The survey question on public satisfaction with the overall performance of the national

administration is as follows: “Sa pangkalahatan, gaano po kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa

kasalukuyang administrasyong nasyonal? Kayo po ba ay LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO

NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, o

LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN? [On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present

national administration? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF

SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, or VERY DISSATISFIED?]”

For the specific subjects, the survey questions are as follows: “GAANO PO KAYO NASISIYAHAN

O HINDI NASISIYAHAN SA PAMAMALAKAD NG KASALUKUYANG ADMINISTRASYONG

NASYONAL TUNGKOL SA (PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES)? MASASABI BA NINYONG KAYO AY

LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI,

MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, O LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN? PAKISAGOT PO ANG MGA

ITO SA PAMAMAGITAN NG PAGLALAGAY NG BAWAT KARD SA NAAANGKOP NA LUGAR SA

RATING BOARD NA ITO. (SHUFFLE CARD) [How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present

national administration’s performance in (programs or activities)? Would you say that you are VERY

SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT

DISSATISFIED, or VERY DISSATISFIED? You may indicate your answers by placing each card on the

appropriate box on this rating board. (SHUFFLE CARD)]”

1. Paglalaban sa terorismo (Fighting terrorism)

2. Pakikipag-ugnayan sa mga rebeldeng Muslim upang ang mga ito ay magbalik-loob sa

pamahalaan (Reconciliation with Muslim rebels)


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 5 of 17

3. Pakikipag-ugnayan sa mga rebeldeng komunista upang ang mga ito ay magbalik-loob sa

pamahalaan (Reconciliation with communist rebels)

4. Pagtutulong sa mga mahihirap (Helping the poor)

5. Paglalaban sa pagtaas ng presyo (Fighting inflation)

6. Paniniguro na walang pamilyang kailanman ay magugutom at walang makain (Ensuring that

no family will ever be hungry and have nothing to eat)

7. Pakikipag-ugnayan sa ibang bansa (Foreign relations)

8. Pagpupuksa ng katiwalian at pangungurakot sa gobyerno (Eradicating graft and corruption

in government)

9. Pagtatanggol sa kasarinlan ng Pilipinas sa West Philippine Sea (Defending Philippine

sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea)

10. Pagbubuo muli sa Lungsod ng Marawi (Reconstruction of Marawi City)

11. Paglalaban sa mga krimeng bumibiktima sa ordinaryong mamamayan tulad ng pagpatay,

holdap, pagnanakaw, pananakit na pisikal, atbp. (Fighting crimes that victimize ordinary

citizens, like killings, holdups, robberies, physical violence, etc.)

SWS employs its own staff for questionnaire design, sampling, fieldwork, data-processing, and

analysis, and does not outsource any of its survey operations. This report was prepared by Leo S. Laroza.

#


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 6 of 17

Chart 1

Table 1

First Quarter 2019 Social Weather ReportMarch 28-31, 2019 National Survey

-+60

-+50

-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

-

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

NET* SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: PHILIPPINES, FEB 1989 – MAR 2019

+72

E

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

Net*

Satisfaction


* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused responses. Q: Sa pangkalahatan, gaano po kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa kasalukuyang administrasyong nasyonal? (SHOWCARD) LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN

C. AQUINOFEB 89 +23SEP 89 +14APR 90 +17NOV 90 -10JUL 91 - 1NOV 91 + 1FEB 92 - 2APR 92 - 5

RAMOSSEP 92 +32DEC 92 +30APR 93 +24JUL 93 +31SEP 93 +14DEC 93 +24APR 94 +15AUG 94 +14NOV 94 +16DEC 94 +17MAR 95 +10JUN 95 + 6OCT 95 -18DEC 95 - 3APR 96 0JUN 96 +11

NET* SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE

OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: PHILIPPINESRAMOS (cont.)

SEP 96 +10DEC 96 - 1APR 97 +28JUN 97 +31SEP 97 + 5DEC 97 +20FEB 98 + 8MAR 98 + 9

ESTRADASEP 98 +19NOV 98 +36MAR 99 +34JUN 99 +28OCT 99 + 2DEC 99 - 8MAR 00 + 6JUL 00 +24SEP 00 +10DEC 00 + 2

ARROYOMAR 01 +27JUL 01 +12SEP 01 + 8NOV 01 +27MAR 02 +12

ARROYO (cont.)MAY 02 0SEP 02 +15NOV 02 +13MAR 03 - 3JUN 03 +23SEP 03 - 6NOV 03 +3MAR 04 +14AUG 04 +15DEC 04 + 3MAR 05 - 6MAY 05 -13AUG 05 -11DEC 05 -15MAR 06 -15JUN 06 + 2SEP 06 - 3NOV 06 - 2FEB 07 - 3SEP 07 + 9DEC 07 -11MAR 08 -19JUN 08 -21SEP 08 -4DEC 08 -1FEB 09 -19

ARROYO (cont.)JUN 09 -11SEP 09 -20DEC 09 -22MAR 10 -45

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +64NOV 10 +64MAR 11 +46JUN 11 +45SEP 11 +56DEC 11 +56MAR 12 +46MAY 12 +44AUG 12 +62DEC 12 +57MAR 13 +53JUN 13 +66SEP 13 +56DEC 13 +51MAR 14 +45JUN 14 +29SEP 14 +35DEC 14 +34MAR 15 +19JUN 15 +31

B. AQUINO (cont.)SEP 15 +37DEC 15 +39APR 16 +35JUN 16 +50

DUTERTESEP 16 +66DEC 16 +61MAR 17 +66JUN 17 +64SEP 17 +58DEC 17 +70MAR 18 +58JUN 18 +58SEP 18 +50DEC 18 +66MAR 19 +72


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 7 of 17

Table 2

Table 3


Overall performance rating 81% 10% 9% +72

Helping the poor 81 10 9 +72

Reconstructing Marawi City 69 18 11 +58

Fighting terrorism 70 17 12 +58

Fighting crimes 65 18 17 +48

Reconciling with communist rebels 61 23 16 +45

Reconciling with Muslim rebels 60 23 16 +44

Eradicating graft and corruption 62 17 20 +41

Foreign relations 58 24 17 +41

Defending Philippine sovereignty in the West PH Sea 60 19 20 +40

Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry 58 20 22 +37

Fighting inflation 53 15 31 +22


SAT UND DIS NET

SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON SPECIFIC ISSUES: PHILIPPINES, MAR 2019

Very Good

(2)

Excellent

Good(7)

Moderate(1)

Excellent(1)



Jun18 Sep18 Dec18 Mar19

SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON SPECIFIC ISSUES: PHILIPPINES, JUN 2018 TO MAR 2019

Overall performance rating +58 +50 +66 +72

Helping the poor +54 +63 +68 +72

Reconstructing Marawi City +55 +58 +60 +58

Fighting terrorism +39 +53 +55 +58

Fighting crimes +37 +43 +44 +48

Reconciling with communist rebels +27 +42 +39 +45

Reconciling with Muslim rebels +31 +41 +43 +44

Eradicating graft and corruption +30 +38 +42 +41

Foreign relations +39 +40 +38 +41

Defending Philippine sovereignty in the West PH Sea +20 +39 +40 +40

Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry +39 +23 +28 +37

Fighting inflation -1 +8 +14 +22

Very Good

(2)

Excellent

Good(7)

Moderate(1)

Excellent(1)


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 8 of 17

Chart 2

Chart 3


NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON HELPING THE POOR: PHILIPPINES, DEC 1993 – MAR 2019


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

E

+72

Net*

Satisfaction


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


ON RECONSTRUCTING MARAWI CITY: PHILIPPINES,

SEP 2017 – MAR 2019


VG

DUTERTE

+58

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 9 of 17

Chart 4

Chart 5


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


ON FIGHTING TERRORISM: PHILIPPINES, NOV 2002 – MAR 2019


+58

VG

ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

Net*

Satisfaction



ON FIGHTING CRIMES: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1990 – MAR 2019


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

Net*

Satisfaction


+48

G


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 10 of 17

Chart 6

Chart 7


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


ON RECONCILING WITH COMMUNIST REBELS: PHILIPPINES,

SEP 1998 – MAR 2019


ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

+45

G

Net*

Satisfaction


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


ON RECONCILING WITH MUSLIM REBELS: PHILIPPINES,

SEP 1998 – MAR 2019


ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

+44

G

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 11 of 17

Chart 8

Chart 9


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION ON

ERADICATING GRAFT AND CORRUPTION: PHILIPPINES,

MAR 1987 – MAR 2019


+41

G

Net*

Satisfaction


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-


ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: PHILIPPINES, SEP 1992 – MAR 2019


+41

G

RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 12 of 17

Chart 10

Chart 11


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

NET SATISFACTION* WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON DEFENDING PHILIPPINE SOVEREIGNTY IN THE WEST

PHILIPPINE SEA: PHILIPPINES, MAR 2018 – MAR 2019

+40

G


DUTERTE

Net*

Satisfaction


-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION ON

ENSURING THAT NO FAMILY WILL BE HUNGRY: PHILIPPINES,

DEC 2004 – MAR 2019


ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

+37

G

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 13 of 17

Chart 12

Chart 13


-+60

-+50

-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

-


ON FIGHTING INFLATION: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1991 – MAR 2019



+22

M

Net*

Satisfaction


-+70-+60-+50-+40-+30-+20-+10

+0+10+20+30+40+50+60+70+80+90

+100

-

-

-

-


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA, FEB 1989 – MAR 2019


NCR +65Bal. Luz +68Vis +74Min +81


Net*

Satisfaction


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 14 of 17

Table 4


C. AQUINOFEB 89 - 2 +22 +28 +37SEP 89 + 7 + 2 +25 +31APR 90 - 4 +24 +18 +15NOV 90 -42 -12 + 3 + 3JUL 91 -28 - 4 +14 + 5NOV 91 -23 0 +13 + 4FEB 92 -18 - 4 + 3 + 7APR 92 -13 - 2 - 2 - 8

RAMOSSEP 92 +35 +34 +23 +34DEC 92 +12 +34 +31 +35APR 93 + 5 +31 +18 +26JUL 93 0 +34 +28 +46SEP 93 0 +15 +16 +22DEC 93 +15 +30 +12 +29APR 94 +13 +19 + 4 +19AUG 94 + 9 +15 +10 +16NOV 94 + 4 +24 +10 +16DEC 94 + 8 +19 +19 +14MAR 95 -17 +19 - 2 +20JUN 95 - 4 +14 - 5 + 9OCT 95 -22 -22 -18 - 9DEC 95 -19 - 3 0 + 7APR 96 -15 + 2 - 9 +13

NCR LUZ VIS MIN

*Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

RAMOS (cont.)JUN 96 - 9 +17 +13 +11SEP 96 + 4 +16 +10 + 1DEC 96 + 7 + 1 -12 + 3APR 97 +31 +35 +15 +24JUN 97 +23 +34 +30 +32SEP 97 + 5 +16 -24 +11DEC 97 +19 +24 + 5 +29FEB 98 -5 + 2 + 6 +29MAR 98 -2 + 8 - 2 +25

ESTRADASEP 98 +19 +22 +15 +17NOV 98 +33 +41 +20 +42MAR 99 +34 +38 +18 +40JUN 99 +23 +35 +15 +30OCT 99 + 9 + 4 -10 + 7DEC 99 -14 - 9 -19 + 4MAR 00 + 2 + 8 - 4 +16JUL 00 +25 +30 - 3 +36SEP 00 + 7 +12 - 1 +20DEC 00 -14 0 -11 +31

ARROYOMAR 01 +30 +25 +25 +30JUL 01 +3 + 4 +18 +26

ARROYO (cont.)SEP 01 - 7 + 2 +19 +19NOV 01 +7 +27 +32 +35MAR 02 - 6 + 7 +29 +17MAY 02 - 3 - 5 - 2 +16SEP 02 - 3 +18 + 4 +28NOV 02 -13 + 5 +23 +34MAR 03 - 6 - 3 + 3 - 6JUN 03 +23 +22 +35 +13SEP 03 - 4 -11 + 2 - 6NOV 03 -15 -7 +19 +18MAR 04 - 6 +13 +27 +18AUG 04 - 5 + 7 +39 +22DEC 04 -11 -5 +17 +16MAR 05 -22 -20 +25 + 5MAY 05 -43 -23 -4 +17AUG 05 -25 -10 +8 -18DEC 05 -27 -11 -9 -21MAR 06 -33 - 8 - 7 -24JUN 06 -35 + 4 +19 + 6SEP 06 +29 - 3 + 5 + 3NOV 06 -10 - 2 + 5 - 1FEB 07 -20 - 6 -2 +12SEP 07 -10 + 8 +17 +16DEC 07 -24 -9 -9 -10MAR 08 -32 -20 -8 -17


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA (page 1 of 2)NCR LUZ VIS MIN NCR LUZ VIS MIN



NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA (page 2 of 2)

ARROYO (cont.)JUN 08 -27 -16 -26 -23SEP 08 -14 -5 -4 +4DEC 08 -20 -1 +12 +1FEB 09 -29 -16 -21 -18JUN 09 -19 -12 -12 -2SEP 09 -22 -21 -21 -15DEC 09 -33 -18 -23 -20MAR 10 -57 -45 -39 -44

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +68 +66 +60 +61NOV 10 +49 +69 +59 +67MAR 11 +50 +42 +51 +47JUN 11 +48 +37 +47 +57SEP 11 +44 +59 +51 +63DEC 11 +64 +52 +58 +56MAR 12 +46 +39 +49 +55MAY 12 +41 +45 +29 +58AUG 12 +56 +65 +64 +59DEC 12 +47 +54 +66 +63MAR 13 +43 +54 +45 +63JUN 13 +53 +68 +76 +63SEP 13 +45 +59 +60 +53DEC 13 +30 +52 +51 +64

NCR LUZ VIS MIN

B. AQUINO (cont.)MAR 14 +37 +41 +45 +56JUN 14 +16 +26 +41 +34SEP 14 +36 +24 +45 +46DEC 14 +21 +35 +31 +43MAR 15 +21 +8 +34 +26JUN 15 +18 +29 +43 +34SEP 15 +24 +44 +34 +34DEC 15 +36 +35 +52 +36APR 16 +17 +30 +58 +33JUN 16 +32 +45 +62 +60

DUTERTESEP 16 +66 +60 +62 +81DEC 16 +53 +56 +58 +78MAR 17 +62 +60 +67 +79JUN 17 +67 +63 +56 +72SEP 17 +51 +52 +57 +74DEC 17 +71 +67 +57 +87MAR 18 +58 +50 +57 +72JUN 18 +47 +54 +56 +76SEP 18 +40 +48 +42 +67DEC 18 +60 +65 +63 +75MAR 19 +65 +68 +74 +81

NCR LUZ VIS MIN



SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 15 of 17

Chart 14

Table 5


-+60

-+50

-+40

-+30

-+20

-+10

+0

+10

+20

+30

+40

+50

+60

+70

+80

+90

+100

-

-

-


NATIONAL ADMIN., by ECONOMIC CLASS, FEB 1989 – MAR 2019


ABC: +73D: +72E: +68


Net*

Satisfaction


C. AQUINOFEB 89 +25 +17 +38SEP 89 - 5 +14 +22APR 90 +26 +16 +15NOV 90 -47 - 7 + 1JUL 91 -27 - 2 +10NOV 91 -25 + 1 +10FEB 92 -25 0 + 2APR 92 -21 - 4 + 2

RAMOSSEP 92 +26 +42 +36DEC 92 +20 +29 +42APR 93 +17 +22 +33JUL 93 + 3 +33 +39SEP 93 + 8 +11 +31DEC 93 +23 +23 +26APR 94 + 5 +16 +17AUG 94 + 9 +13 +19NOV 94 + 8 +17 +18DEC 94 +10 +14 +28MAR 95 - 5 +11 +13JUN 95 - 8 + 8 + 9OCT 95 -14 -20 -14DEC 95 -19 - 3 + 3APR 96 -14 - 3 +17

ABC D E

RAMOS (cont.)JUN 96 + 4 +12 +10SEP 96 + 8 + 5 +27DEC 96 +16 - 5 + 6APR 97 +33 +27 +27JUN 97 +39 +31 +27SEP 97 + 8 + 3 +14DEC 97 +27 +20 +17FEB 98 + 2 + 7 +18MAR 98 + 3 + 9 +11SEP 98 + 6 +18 +34

ESTRADANOV 98 +27 +37 +36MAR 99 +27 +34 +38JUN 99 +20 +29 +30OCT 99 + 5 0 +10DEC 99 - 9 -10 - 2MAR 00 + 4 + 6 + 8JUL 00 +18 +24 +28SEP 00 - 5 +10 +20DEC 00 -30 + 3 +13

ARROYOMAR 01 +30 +25 +29JUL 01 +16 +11 +12

ABC D E

ARROYO (cont.)SEP 01 0 + 7 +13NOV 01 +14 +30 +16MAR 02 +17 +15 + 1MAY 02 - 4 -3 +11SEP 02 + 7 +19 + 6NOV 02 + 1 +17 + 7MAR 03 -16 0 - 7JUN 03 +40 +19 +27SEP 03 + 5 - 7 - 8NOV 03 -14 0 +16MAR 04 +6 +15 +15AUG 04 +22 +15 +14DEC 04 + 1 - 3 +19MAR 05 -21 - 5 + 2MAY 05 -15 -18 0AUG 05 - 2 -11 -15DEC 05 - 9 -17 -12MAR 06 -37 -9 -24JUN 06 - 1 + 4 - 3SEP 06 - 9 - 1 - 6NOV 06 +10 - 4 - 1FEB 07 + 4 - 2 - 6SEP 07 +20 +8 +9DEC 07 -21 -9 -13MAR 08 -18 -19 -19

ABC D E


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by ECONOMIC CLASS (page 1 of 2)



SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 16 of 17

Table 6


ARROYO (cont.)JUN 08 -24 -19 -25SEP 08 -14 -2 -5DEC 08 0 +2 -7FEB 09 -26 -20 -16JUN 09 -12 -12 -7SEP 09 -35 -21 -15DEC 09 -34 -22 -17MAR 10 -47 -47 -41

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +65 +66 +57NOV 10 +62 +64 +65MAR 11 +19 +46 +50JUN 11 +45 +48 +36SEP 11 +62 +57 +52DEC 11 +54 +57 +53MAR 12 +38 +44 +52MAY 12 +27 +44 +50AUG 12 +69 +62 +60DEC 12 +78 +54 +62MAR 13 +68 +50 +60JUN 13 +61 +65 +71SEP 13 +62 +56 +54DEC 13 +54 +51 +50

ABC D E

B. AQUINO (cont.)MAR 14 +32 +45 +48JUN 14 +27 +27 +38SEP 14 +47 +33 +38DEC 14 +41 +32 +40MAR 15 +19 +18 +24JUN 15 +33 +29 +38SEP 15 +21 +38 +40DEC 15 +23 +39 +44APR 16 +17 +32 +46JUN 16 +24 +51 +50

DUTERTESEP 16 +58 +68 +62DEC 16 +55 +61 +62MAR 17 +61 +66 +69JUN 17 +55 +64 +68SEP 17 +60 +60 +46DEC 17 +62 +71 +66MAR 18 +56 +58 +54JUN 18 +81 +56 +62SEP 18 +47 +50 + 49 DEC 18 +72 +65 +70MAR 19 +73 +72 +68

ABC D E


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by ECONOMIC CLASS (page 2 of 2)



PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: JUN 2018 TO MAR 2019 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*

Jun 18

Sep 18

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 18

Sep 18

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 18

Sep 18

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 18

Sep 18

Dec 18

Mar 19

Total PH 72% 65% 76% 81% 15% 19% 15% 10% 13% 15% 9% 9% +58 +50 +66 +72

NCR 66 58 73 77 14 24 13 11 20 18 13 12 +47 +40 +60 +65

Bal. Luzon 67 65 75 78 19 17 16 12 13 17 9 10 +54 +48 +65 +68

Visayas 71 61 73 82 13 18 17 9 15 19 10 8 +56 +42 +63 +74

Mindanao 84 73 81 88 8 19 12 6 7 6 7 7 +76 +67 +75 +81

Urban 66 62 79 82 16 20 10 7 17 17 11 11 +49 +45 +68 +71

Rural 77 67 74 81 13 18 18 11 10 13 8 8 +67 +54 +65 +72

ABC 86 65 81 80 9 18 10 14 5 17 9 7 +81 +47 +72 +73

D 70 65 75 81 15 18 15 9 14 15 10 9 +56 +50 +65 +72

E 73 63 79 79 14 23 12 10 11 14 9 11 +62 +49 +70 +68

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Question. On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present national administration? Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied?


SWS MEDIA RELEASE

3 May 2019, page 17 of 17


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: JUN 2018 TO MAR 2019 (page 2 of 2)Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*

Jun 18

Sep 18

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 18

Sep 18

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 18

Sep 18

Dec 18

Mar 19

Jun 18

Sep 18

Dec 18

Mar 19

Total PH 72% 65% 76% 81% 15% 19% 15% 10% 13% 15% 9% 9% +58 +50 +66 +72

Men 72 66 77 82 13 17 15 9 14 16 8 9 +59 +50 +69 +73

Women 71 64 74 80 16 21 15 11 13 14 11 9 +58 +50 +64 +71

18-24 70 63 74 86 19 23 16 9 12 11 10 5 +58 +52 +64 +80

25-34 70 66 79 80 15 20 13 7 14 13 8 13 +56 +53 +71 +67

35-44 70 66 77 83 18 19 14 9 11 15 10 8 +59 +51 +67 +75

45-54 73 66 77 81 12 17 14 13 15 15 9 6 +58 +50 +68 +75

55 + 74 64 73 78 12 17 16 10 14 17 10 11 +60 +47 +63 +67

Some Elem 72 61 73 79 17 26 18 11 9 11 9 10 +63 +51 +64 +68

Some HS 74 68 77 82 13 14 13 9 12 17 10 9 +62 +52 +67 +73

Some Voc/Coll

68 64 7580

16 19 1510

16 16 1010

+52 +48 +65+71

Coll. Grad 79 65 80 84 10 22 13 9 11 12 6 7 +68 +52 +73 +77

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Question. On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present national administration? Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied?