Transcript
Page 1: Effects of pesticides on the ecological function of benthic ......Effects of pesticides on the ecological function of benthic grazing Marcus Rybicki, Carola Winkelmann, Dirk Jungmann

Effects of pesticides on the ecological function of benthic grazing

Marcus Rybicki, Carola Winkelmann, Dirk JungmannTU Dresden, Faculty of Forestry, Geo- and Hydrosciences, Institute of Hydrobiology

Background:•Modernapproachesoftheeffectanalysisofchemicalsare based on structural parameters (e.g mortality,reproduction)

• Functional parameters (e.g. primary production) aredeemedtobemoretolerantagainstdisturbance,duetothebufferingcapacity,thenstructuralones

• But functionalparameterscanbe » Well buffered -highnumberofperformingspecies,e.g.primaryproduction

» Less buffered-onlylimitednumberofperformingspecies,e.g.benthicgrazing

•Lessbufferedfunctionsmightbelesstolerantagainststressorswiththeresultof

» Reduced effort » Loss of the function

Weusedthefunctionofbenthicgrazingasamodeltoinvestigatewhetherdisturbancesbypesticidesareabletonegativelyinfluenceecosystemfunctions

The function of benthic grazing:•Importantecologicalfunctionofstreamecosystems•Performedbymacroinvertebrateswithmayflieslarvaeasmostimportantgroup Rhithrogena semicolorata (highly abundant species)

•Mostimportantduringspringtocontrolthegrowthofaufwuchscausedbyincreasingwatertemperaturesandlightavailability

•Uncontrolled growth of aufwuchs leads to clogging of the streambed(organiccolmation)» Reducedwaterexchangebetweenstreamandthehyporheicinterstitial» Degradinglivingconditionsfororganismswithintheinterstitial

Methods:• Experimentsinmicro-andmesocosms• Organisms(aufwuchs/R. semicolorata)fromasecondordermountainstreamnearDresden(Gauernitzbach)

• Herbicide(Terbutryn,0.006–6µgL-1)1.experimentNov2007–Feb2008(glassvessels)2.experimentNov2009–Feb2010(artificialstreams)

• Insecticide(lambda-Cyhalothrin;0,009–9µgg-1OC)1.experimentFeb2010–March2010(beakers)2.experimentFeb2010–May2010(artificalstreams)

Hypothesis I falsified

Herbicide (Terbutryn)

Direct effects of Terbutryn on aufwuchs

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

time [d]

graz

er −

dry

wei

ght [

mg]

6 13 27 41 55 69

control0.0060.060.66

control 0.06 0.6 6graz

er −

trig

lyce

ride

cont

ent [

µMol

g−1

DW

]

0

200

400

600

800

* **

treatment control 0.006 0.06 0.6 61.experiment(microcosms)

17±6 - 19±5 12±5 8±1

2.experiment(art. streams)

1.1 1.1 3.3 6.7 6.7

grazer mortality[%] in both experiments:

Insecticide (lambda-Cyhalothrin)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

time [d]

graz

er −

dry

wei

ght [

mg]

0 6 13 27 41 55 69

control0.0090.090.99

control 0.009 0.09 0.9 9

graz

er −

mor

talit

y [%

]

0

20

40

60

80

100

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

time [d]

PO

C [m

g C

cm

−2]

−15 −8 0 6 13 20 27 41 55 69

control0,0090,090,99 control 0.009 0.09 0.9 9 µg g-1OC

control 0.009 0.09 0.9 9graz

er −

trig

lyce

ride

cont

ent [

µMol

g−1

DW

]

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Direct effects of lambda-Cyhalothrin (LCH) on grazers

» Aufwuchs biomass increased (1. experiment: 0.9 & 9 µg g-1OC, 2. experiment: 9 µg g-1OC)

» Concentration response of mortality with LCH (LC50 = 1.6 µg g-1OC) » Change of feeding behavior:

• Reduced growth (dry weight) of grazers (0.9 µg g-1OC)• Reduced triglyceride content of grazers (0.09 & 0.9 µg g-1OC)

Hypothesis II falsified

Hypothesis IHerbicides might change the quantity and quality of aufwuchs, but an indirect effect on the grazers will not

occurr

Hypothesis IIThe function of benthic grazing will be affected by in-secticides just due to the direct mortality of the grazers

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

time [d]

PO

C [m

g C

cm

−2]

−15 −8 0 6 13 20 27 41 55 69

control0.0060.060.66

Figure 2: Development of particulate organic carbon as parameter for the aufwuchs biomass during the 2. Ter-butryn experiment [mean ± se]. Error bars indicate variation within the streams. Terbutryn concentrations in µg L-1. The red circle indicates the difference at the end of the experiment.

Figure 3: View into the living aufwuchs communi-ty with a fluorescent stereobinocular microscope (magnification: 1.6x11.25).

rela

tive

abun

danc

e [%

]

cont

rol

0.06 0.6 6

cont

rol

0.06 0.6 6

cont

rol

0.06 0.6 6

0

25

50

75

100t0 - start t27 t55 - end

diat

oms

cyan

ophy

ta

Figure 4: Change of the aufwuchs composition during the 1. Terbutryn experiment. Terbutryn concentrations in µg L-1.

» Aufwuchs biomass reduced (NOEC = 0,6 µg L-1, LOEC = 6 µg L-1) » Aufwuchs composition shifted to cyanophyts

Quantity Quality

Indirect effects of Tebutryn on grazers

Table 1: Mortality of grazers during the Terbutryn experiments [mean ± se]. Terbutryn concentrations in µg L-1

Figure 5: Development of grazer dry weight during the 2. Ter-butryn experiment [mean ± se]. Error bars indicate variation within the streams. Terbutryn concentrations in µg L-1

Figure 6: Triglyceride content of grazers at the end of the 1. Terbutryn experiment [mean ± se]. Error bars indicate variation between replicates. Terbutryn concen-trations in µg L-1. */** significance level: 0.05/0.01. » No effect on grazer mortality

» Growth (dry weight) of grazers reduced (6 µg L-1) » Triglyceride content of grazers reduced (0.6 & 6 µg L-1)

Figure 7: Mortality of grazers during the 2. LCH experiment [mean ± se]. LCH con-centrations in µg g-1 OC.

Figure 8: Development of grazer dry weight during the 2. LCH experiment [mean ± se]. Error bars indicate varia-tion within the streams. LCH concentrations in µg g-1 OC

Figure 9: Triglyceride content of grazers at the end of the 2. LCH experiment [mean ± se]. Error bars indicate variation within the streams. LCH concentrations in µg g-1 OC

Indirect effects of lambda-Cyhalothrin on aufwuchs

Figure 12: Aufwuchs biomass at the end of the 2. LCH experiment. LCH concentrations in µg g-1OC.

Figure 11: Development of particulate organic carbon as parameter for aufwuchs biomass during the 2. LCH ex-periment [mean ± se]. Error bars indicate variation within the streams. LCH concentrations in µg g-1OC.

control 0.009 0.09 0.9 9

PO

C [m

g C

cm−2

]

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

*

***

Figure 10: Particulate organic carbon as pa-rameter for aufwuchs biomass at the end of the 1. LCH experiment [mean ± se]. Error bars indicate variation between rep-licates. LCH concentrations in µg g-1OC. */*** significance level: 0.05/0.01.

Conclusion:• Herbicides indirectly decrease the physiological fitness of grazers,duetothereductionoffoodqualityandquantity

• Insecticides directly reduce the feeding activityofgrazersinsublethalconcen-trationsand decrease their physiological fitness

•Adecreased physiological fitness migth increase the sensitivity of grazers

againstotherenvironmentalstressorsand reduce their reproductive effort

Prospects:•Experimentswithcombinedexposureofherbicidesandinsecticidesinartificalstreamsandinbatchexperimentswithhigherreplication

Contact: [email protected] – Project Nr.080940733

DFG – Project Nr.Be 1671/14-1 FKZ

Possible disturbances of benthic grazing by pesticides:

insecticide

herbicide

aufw

uchs

− a

sh fr

ee d

ry w

eigh

t [m

g cm

−2]

Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul

0

0.5

1

1.5

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

graz

er −

bio

mas

s [m

g cm

−2]

grazeraufwuchs

time of herbicide use

time of insecticide use

egg/hatch growth emergence

biomass of grazer and aufwuchs 2005/06

Figure 1: Development of aufwuchs and grazer biomass dur-ing the life cycle of Rhithrogena semicolorata. Colored lines indicate possible times of disturbance of grazers by pesticides (dotted = indirect, solid = direct).

only slight increase

decreased triglycerids without change of dry weight

decreased triglycerides

A negative effect of pesticides on the function of benthic grazing is possible!

Recommended