Connecting Process Safety Performance OutcomesConnecting Process Safety Performance Outcomesto Process Safety Cultural Root Causesto Process Safety Cultural Root Causes
Process Safety Culture – The Key to Sustainable PerformanceProcess Safety Culture – The Key to Sustainable Performance
Steve Arendt, Vice PresidentOrganizational Performance AssuranceABS Consulting, Houston, Texas [email protected]
AmCham 12th Annual HSSE ConferenceIntegrating HSSE and Business: A Formula for Development15-18 Sept 2008 Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago
3
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
What is EHS/process safety culture? Telltale signs of a EHS/process safety culture Essential features of good culture How to evaluate culture Connect EHS performance to culture Culture case study example results Industry needs in EHS/process safety culture Conclusions
4
Safety Culture FailuresSafety Culture Failures Challenger & ColumbiaChallenger & Columbia Piper AlphaPiper Alpha LongfordLongford ChernobylChernobyl FlixboroughFlixborough Texas City
5
What Is EHS/Process Safety Culture?What Is EHS/Process Safety Culture?Our Company and Individual DNAOur Company and Individual DNA
Culture is the tendency in all of us – and our organization - to want to do the right thing in the right way at the right time, ALL the time – even when if no one is looking
Culture is the result of all the actions - and inactions - in institutional/workforce memory
Culture is hard to measure and more difficult to change; it will be the “root cause of the decade”
6
Telltale Signs of EHS/Safety Culture DiseaseTelltale Signs of EHS/Safety Culture Disease
Ineffective EHS/PSM system performance Inadequate reaction to fixing identified
problems - lack of follow-up/huge backlogs Superficial audits - “check the box”
mentality Inadequate metrics-misplaced confidence
in injury rates Poor management review at all levels
7
Telltale Signs of EHS/Safety Culture DiseaseTelltale Signs of EHS/Safety Culture Disease
Weak conduct of operations/lack of operating excellence
Poor incident reporting, learning and risk review
No MOOC (people, policies, or organization) Chronic cost-cutting and production pressure/
emphasis over process safety Plenty of “talk”, but hard to find examples of
leading by doing through the organization
8
Accident PyramidAccident Pyramid
Accidents
Incidents
Precursors
Management System Failures
Unsafe Behaviors and Attitudes
Culture – Individual and Organizational Tendencies
© ABSG Consulting, Inc.
9
Truncated Accident PyramidTruncated Accident Pyramid
Accidents
Incidents
Precursors
Management System Failures
Unsafe Behaviors and Attitudes
Culture – Individual and Organizational Tendencies
© ABSG Consulting, Inc.
10
Improve Throughout the PyramidImprove Throughout the Pyramid
Accidents
Incidents
Precursors
Management System Failures
Unsafe Behaviors and Attitudes
Culture – Individual and Organizational Tendencies
© ABSG Consulting, Inc.
11
Process Safety Culture – Essential FeaturesProcess Safety Culture – Essential Features
1. Establish safety as a core value
2. Provide strong leadership
3. Establish and enforce high standards of performance
4. Formalize the safety culture emphasis/approach
5. Maintain a sense of vulnerability
6. Empower individuals to successfully fulfill their safety responsibilities
7. Defer to expertise
8. Ensure open and effective communications
9. Establish a questioning/learning environment
10. Foster mutual trust
11. Provide timely response to safety issues and concerns
12. Provide continuous monitoring of performance
12
We Need Something More than “Just We Need Something More than “Just Opinions” upon which to Make Process Opinions” upon which to Make Process
Safety Improvement Investment DecisionsSafety Improvement Investment Decisions
Employee surveys are important, but they have weaknesses Sometimes they are viewed as being informational, but not
providing definitive arguments for action Particularly, expensive action… The PAR approach “connects opinions with process safety
outcomes” that “prove out” the opinions Recommendations from a PAR give confidence that you are
fixing things throughout the accident pyramid
13
Connecting the Dots – EHS/Process Safety Connecting the Dots – EHS/Process Safety Performance Assurance Review (PAR)Performance Assurance Review (PAR)©© Strategy Strategy
Mapping of EHS Technical Performance and Culture Evidence to Process Safety Culture Factors
Process Safety/EHS CultureEvaluation Sources
Surveys and interviews
Work observations
PSM/EHSleading indicators
Process Safety/EHS Performance Information Sources
Incidents and investigation results Process Safety/ESH Culture
Essential FeaturesCausal Factors
Tenets of Operation
Audits and assessments
Action item completion history
© ABSG Consulting, Inc.
14
Culture Case Study Example ResultsCulture Case Study Example Results Over the past two years, process safety performance and
culture reviews have been conducted for 10+ companies in the oil, chemical, pharmaceutical, consumer products industries Tens of 1,000’s of employees 50+ facilities – onshore and offshore Domestic U.S. and international Old companies and new companies
All of these studies included an evaluation of safety culture – most also involved mapping to process safety performance outcomes
Some observations and lessons from looking at the combined results – company names not included
16
Overall Culture Survey ResultsOverall Culture Survey Results
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Reporting
Committment to PS
Supervisor Oversight
PS Procedures
Employee Involvement
PS Training
Denmark Overall
Employees
Managers
% Positive Responses
Average of all questions
Obvious result, but look into it
17
PAR ApproachPAR Approach
Takes culture survey results and maps them to process safety culture essential features
Takes technical performance outcomes and maps them to the same features Weights PSM outcomes according to risk significance Not all findings are “created equal”
Identifies process safety culture issues that need to be worked on Negative survey responses indicating a problem with one or
more culture features Supported by technical performance evidence from the field that
“backs up” the survey “opinions” so you can be certain that these problems actually exist and are not “just feelings”
18
PAR Process Safety Performance vs. Culture MapPAR Process Safety Performance vs. Culture Map
Analysis of all process safety performance data (e.g., audit actions) is sorted into the 12 essential features
Culture survey results and other sourcesare sorted into the 12 essential features
19
Cultural Causal Factor Survey Score
PARRank
1. Process safety is NOT a core value 57 1
9. Lack of a questioning/learning environment 56 1
11. Non-responsiveness to safety concerns 59 23. Not meeting performance standards – “normalization of deviance” 61 2
5. Lack of sense of vulnerability 52 3
10. Lack of mutual trust 47 3
6. Empower individuals to fulfill their safety responsibilities 74 4
8. Ensure open and effective communications 70 47. Defer to expertise 58 54. Formalize the Safety culture emphasis/approach 69 5
2. Provide strong leadership 57 6
12. Provide continuous monitoring of performance 67 6
Cultural Causal Factors Needing Attention Cultural Causal Factors Needing Attention
20
9. Lack of a Questioning/Learning Environment9. Lack of a Questioning/Learning EnvironmentTechnical Evidence No. of Finding Issues Containment integrity issue allowed to exist 5 Safety hazard situation is allowed to exist 2 Unsafe work practice 2 Action item not completed, late, or chronic 5 Inadequate maintenance, inspection, testing 7 Inadequate monitoring or auditing 4 Inadequate training 3 Inadequate hazard, risk or RCA review/analysis 10
Culture Evidence (% positive responses) In my work area, we actively participate in incident and accident investigations - 62.4% In the past 12 months, I have received adequate training on process safety - 31.2% Newly hired workers at my site receive adequate training in process safety - 30.1% Contractors at my site receive adequate training in process safety - 25.5% Overall, I am satisfied with the process safety training we receive - 36.4%
21
Lack of a Questioning/Learning Lack of a Questioning/Learning Environment – Possible SolutionsEnvironment – Possible Solutions Widely circulate the CCPS Process Safety Beacon Distribute summaries of incident reports that include what happened,
lessons learned, and how the lessons learned might apply locally Employ a “high potential incident” practice of communicating notable
incidents across the company and industry Modify the incident investigation system to more fully address “what
could have happened” instead of only the actual incident consequences
Conduct table top drills with operating teams to discuss response to operating problems and incident scenarios
Review key hazard scenarios with highest potential consequences from PHA’s with operating and technical teams
For outside incidents with lessons learned that have serious potential local consequences, require documented follow-up to ensure similar conditions do not exist or are well managed locally
Conduct hazard awareness training for operating/technical teams
22
Cultural Causal Factor – Decreasing Frequency
1. Normalization of deviance
2. Non-responsiveness to safety concerns
3. Lack of a questioning/learning environment
4. No performance monitoring/pursuit of improvement
5. Lack of sense of vulnerability
6. Lack of trust – unsafe reporting environment
Ranking of Cultural Causal Factors Present – Ranking of Cultural Causal Factors Present – Summary of Study Results Summary of Study Results
23
Cultural Causal Factor – Decreasing Frequency
7. Not listening to technical experts
8. Process safety is NOT a core value
9. Lack of strong PS leadership
10. Ineffective communications
11. Lack of personal responsibility for process safety
12. No formalization of a “culture process”
Ranking of Cultural Causal Factors Present – Ranking of Cultural Causal Factors Present – Summary of Study Results Summary of Study Results
24
Observations on Culture ResultsObservations on Culture Results
The top three cultural problems were way above all the others
Surprising that “culture foundation issues” were so low – core value and strong leadership
Two of the 10 companies had process safety culture problems that were not high in the other 8 cases
Seven out of 10 of the companies had undergone significant organizational change in this decade
No direct information on cultural root causes – research continues as to how these companies got to the point where they are
Even without having robust cultural root cause information, it is possible to heal culture disease
25
Sense, Learn, and Fix at Every LevelSense, Learn, and Fix at Every Level
Put sensors, not censors, at every level
Develop learnings at every level
Take corrective action at every level
Accidents
Incidents
Precursors
Management System Failures
Unsafe Behaviors and Attitudes
Culture – Individual and Organizational Tendencies
© ABSG Consulting, Inc.
26
Putting Sensors at Every LevelPutting Sensors at Every Level
Some activities must be monitored using leading indicators if they want to improve, not just by having accidents happen
Use a human health care analogy Lagging indicator = an autopsy after a heart attack Leading indicator = blood pressure, cholesterol, EKG Culture indicator = examining DNA
We must use leading indicators in process safety if we hope to drive continuous improvement; we must address culture for sustainable performance
27
Examples of Process Safety MetricsExamples of Process Safety Metrics
PS accident rate
PS incident rate
Releases that don’t have consequences Upsets/safety system challenges Significant mgmt system failures
% WOs misclassified as RIK Action item backlog/aging Inspection overdues
Unsafe acts
Culture survey results Work observations Some leading indicators
Accidents
Incidents
Precursors
Management System Failures
Unsafe Behaviors and Attitudes
Culture – Individual and Organizational Tendencies
© ABSG Consulting, Inc.
28
Improve Throughout the PyramidImprove Throughout the PyramidAccidents
Incidents
Precursors
Management System Failures
Unsafe Behaviors and Attitudes
Culture – Individual and Organizational Tendencies
© ABSG Consulting, Inc.
But If You Fix These, Are You Certain
But If You Fix These, Are You Certain
Things Will Get Better and Stay Better?
Things Will Get Better and Stay Better?
ALLALL have underlying
culture/behavior root
causes
If you don't sense, learn and fix throughout
If you don't sense, learn and fix throughout
the accident pyramid, performance
the accident pyramid, performance
problems will recur
problems will recur
29
Industry Needs in EHS/Process Safety CultureIndustry Needs in EHS/Process Safety Culture
No formally recognized, systematic way to evaluate culture
No widely recognized set of metrics Lack of understanding of the "pathology of
process safety culture disease" No prescription or set of remedies for curing
culture ailments No case studies of evolution of cultural root
causes
30
Motivations for Improving EHS
Recent major accident Series of incidents Regulatory – new rule or enforcement actions Industry group membership obligation Peer pressure/comparisons of existing practices Perception that risk is not tolerable/increasing Resource pressures Company policy of continuous improvement
31
Once You Have Identified Where Your EHS/Process Safety Technical and Cultural Issues Exist…
Use Risk Based Process Safety as the “toolbox” to redesign or improve your EHS/PSM performance
32
Risk Based Process Safety CCPS published its original 12 PSM elements in
1989 and followed it with 3 other management system books thru 1994
A lot of experience and lessons have been learned since then; CCPS wanted to update its PSM framework to be useful as an industry thought and action leader for the next 15 years
RBPS came about for two reasons: To be able to generate better results with fewer resources To provide a “target” and an approach for companies of all
needs to implement, correct, and improve PSM systems
33
CCPS Risk Based Process Safety –Next Generation in PSM Systems
20 subcommittee members representing the process industry
16 peer reviewers 2+ year effort that:
surveyed PSM/ESH systems from around the world to identify good features
benchmarked with over 60 companies in three workshops to compile leading practices, improvement idea, and metrics
760-page guideline written by a team from ABS Consulting
34
Risk Based Process Safety
Management systems should be the simplest that they can be while still being fit-for-purpose
Consider the following issues when determining management system “rigor” Perception of complexity, hazard, and risk Demand for the system results and the resources
required to deliver them Current company/facility culture
To design, correct, and improve process safety management activities
35
RBPS Accident Prevention Pillars
1. Commit to Process Safety
2. Understand Hazards and Risk
3. Manage Risk
4. Learn from Experience
36
A Management System Is… A formal, established set of activities explained in
sufficient detail and designed to accomplish a specific goal by the intended users in a consistent fashion over a long time
Management systems consider the following issues: Purpose and scope Personnel roles and responsibilities Tasks and procedures Necessary inputs and anticipated results Personnel qualifications and training Activity triggers, desired schedule, and deadlines Resources and tools needed Measurement, management review, and continuous improvement Auditing
37
Risk Based Process Safety ElementsRisk Based Process Safety Elements
Commit to Process SafetyCommit to Process Safety1. Process Safety Culture2. Compliance to Standards3. Process Safety Competency4. Workforce Involvement5. Stakeholder Outreach
Understand Hazards and RiskUnderstand Hazards and Risk6. Process Knowledge
Management7. Hazard Identification and Risk
Analysis
Manage RiskManage Risk8. Operating Procedures9. Safe Work Practices
Manage Risk (cont.)Manage Risk (cont.)10. Asset Integrity and Reliability11. Contractor Management12. Training and Performance13. Management of Change14. Operational Readiness15. Conduct of Operations16. Emergency Management
Learn from ExperienceLearn from Experience17. Incident Investigation18. Measurement and Metrics19. Auditing20. Management Review and
Continuous Improvement
38
RBPS Elements – Relationship to PSMRBPS Elements – Relationship to PSMRBPS Element New
ElementExpanded
ScopeImprovedPractices
Process Safety Culture
Compliance to Standards
Process Safety Competency
Workforce Involvement
Stakeholder Outreach
Process Knowledge Management
Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis
Operating Procedures
Safe Work Practices
Asset Integrity and Reliability
Contractor Management
Training and Performance
Management of Change
Operational Readiness
Conduct of Operations
Emergency Management
Incident Investigation
Measurement and Metrics
Auditing
Management Review and Continuous Improvement
39
RBPS System Structure Element
Key Principles Essential Features
Possible Work ActivitiesImplementation Examples
Performance Improvement Practice
Efficiency Improvement Practice
List of metrics Management review items
40
RBPS Element Structure Example Process Safety Competency
Key Principle (1 of 4) – Enhance competency Essential Features (1 of 10) – Solicit
knowledge from external sourcesPossible Work Activities (1 of 22) –
Participate in industry group/networksImplementation Examples (1 of 3) –
Encourage certain employees to take committee leadership roles
Improvement Ideas – 19Possible Metrics – 18Management Review
Items - 12
41
ESH Management System
Layered Control of ESH Management SystemsLayered Control of ESH Management Systems
Metrics – daily, weekly, monthly
Management Review – monthly, quarterly
Audits – annually and greater
© ABSG Consulting, Inc.
42
ConclusionsConclusions
Sustainable process safety performance must: Use a blend of risk management approaches Focus on establishing the right culture Let your “walk” lead your “talk” Use a layered approach to management system
control Sense, learn, and correct throughout the pyramid
Companies need motivation for self-examination and change – the ability to integrate, analyze, and act upon “weak signals”
43
ConclusionsConclusions
Have health check-ups to identify early culture disease symptoms
Establish process safety leading indicators Get “vaccinations” by regular, effective
management reviews of process safety performance – spotlight good and bad
Develop and administer process safety culture “vitamins”