Environmental Assessment Lakeview Waterfront Connection
350500-000-003-010 – FINAL – April 2014 SENES Consultants
APPENDIX I
SUPPLEMENTARY SUBSURFACE ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS
Prepared By:
REPORT TO
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
SUPPLEMENTARY SUBSURFACEENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION
LAKEVIEW WATERFRONT CONNECTION PROJECTMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
September 2013
REPORTTO
TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
SUPPLEMENTARY SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONLAKEVIEW WATERFRONT CONNECTION PROJECT
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
Prepared by:
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES121 Granton Drive, Unit II
Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 3N4CANADA
Tel: (905) 882-5984Fax: (905) 882-8962E-Mail: engineers~dcsltd.caWeb Page: www.dcsltd.ca
September 2013
350500
netw
flI’C 121 Granton Drive, Unit 11Richmond Hill, Ontario
Canada L4B 3N4
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES Tel: (905) 882-5984Fax: (905) 882-8962
E-mail: engineers~dcsltd.caWeb site http:llwww.dcsltd.ca
350500
13 September2013
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority70 Canuck AvenueDownsview, OntarioM3K 2C5
Attention: Mr. Ken Dion, M.Sc.
Re: Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection ProjectMississauga, Ontario
Dear Sirs:
We are pleased to submit, herewith, our report on the supplementary subsurface investigation atthe above-noted site.
Should you require additional information, or should you require clarification with respect to anyaspect of the enclosed, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Yours very truly,
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
‘S
Michael D. Weber, P.Geo., QPSenior Project Manager
Specialists in Property Assessments and Environmental Audits, Site Remediation and DecommissioningGeotechnical Engineering, Hydrogeology, Waste and Wastewater Management and Industrial Hygiene
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA
350500-005 – September 2013 i
DCS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of the supplementary environmental investigation was to obtain current information
on the environmental conditions of the soil and groundwater adjacent to the proposed
development area. The results of the investigation will be used in the EA to undertake the
screening level assessment of the Alternative LWC Project Configurations under consideration
for the shoreline development as well as the detailed assessment of the Preferred Alternative for
the LWC Project. A secondary purpose of the investigation was the assessment of subsurface
(soil and groundwater) conditions in a proposed re-alignment routing of Serson Creek that would
connect Serson Creek to Applewood Creek and divert base flow from Serson Creek through a
newly constructed stream channel into Applewood Creek.
The locations of the boreholes and groundwater monitoring wells are shown on Drawing
350500-1 and were generally arranged in two groupings;
ten boreholes (identified as MW12-1 to MW12-10) were drilled to depths of
approximately three to 13 metres below ground surface (mbgs) adjacent to the proposed
land creation area that borders the southern limit of the Waste Water Treatment Facility
(WWTF). Groundwater monitoring wells were installed at each of these locations.
six boreholes (identified as MW12-11, MW12-12, BH12-13, MW12-14, BH12-15 and
MW12-16) were advanced to depths of approximately 8.0 mbgs within the proposed Serson
Creek re-alignment route of Serson Creek that would connect Serson Creek to Applewood Creek
and divert base flow from Serson Creek through a newly constructed stream channel into
Applewood Creek:
four (identified by the prefix MW12-) that were completed as groundwater
monitoring wells.
The soil and groundwater conditions, as encountered in the boreholes and groundwater
monitoring wells installed during the current investigation, are documented in the detailed
borehole logs contained in Appendix B and summarized in Section 3.2 of this report.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA
350500-005 – September 2013 ii
DCS
Soil and groundwater samples were collected at each borehole and groundwater monitoring well
location and tested for a selection of potential contaminants including inorganic substances,
petroleum hydrocarbon compounds (PHCs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). In addition, two
composite soil samples were prepared and subjected to distilled water leachate testing.
The results of the testing of fill and native soil along the shoreline near the proposed LWC
Project Area identified a number of instances where the soils did not meet the applicable
Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Site Condition Standards (SCS). These results were largely
represented by metals along with electrical conductivity (EC) and sodium absorption ratio (SAR)
reported in fill. Very localized concentrations of PHCs (in MW12-4 associated with fill that
exhibited petroleum hydrocarbon odours) and PAHs (MW12-8) were also reported. The source
of these soil impacts is attributed to the environmental condition of the fill used for land creation
to accommodate the past expansion to the WWTF. It is understood that land creation and
construction of the naturalization features will not involve the disturbance of any of the existing
land mass beyond the possible removal of armour stones where it is installed along portions of
the existing shoreline.
The primary concern with regards to the development of new terrestrial and wetland habitat is
the potential for the migration of contaminated groundwater discharging into these areas,
whether the source of the groundwater contamination is from the near shore soil conditions or
from some other source further upgradient. In this regard, testing of groundwater from the wells
installed along the shoreline did not report any concentrations of analytes that exceeded the
applicable generic MOE SCS for groundwater within 30 m of an open water body (Table 9 SCS)
except for one instance of F3 PHCs reported in MW12-1 located at the western end of the LWC
Project Study Area (530 ug/L versus 500 ug/L). These results indicate that the soil
contamination (identified as those compounds that exceed the applicable MOE SCS) has not
impacted groundwater quality in any significant manner.
The MOE SCS for F3 PHCs in groundwater is not an ecological-derived or human
health-derived risk-based value. The MOE SCS has been established based upon the relatively
low solubility of F3 PHC s in groundwater and thus the potential for the formation of non
aqueous phase liquid (NAPL). It should be noted that no evidence of a NAPL was identified
within the LWC Project Study Area and thus, the result reported in MW12-1 is not considered to
be a significant concern warranting further remedial or mitigative action. An on-going periodic
groundwater sampling program could be developed to monitor groundwater conditions going
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA
350500-005 – September 2013 iii
DCS
forward to ensure that there are no future concerns to the land creation and naturalization
development.
Fill was encountered in thicknesses ranging from 0.61 to 2.44 mbgs along the proposed route of
the Serson Creek realignment. Fill thicknesses was most evident in the western-most boreholes
(MW12-11 to MW12-13) that were situated on top of a reported former rail spur (MW12-11 and
MW12-12) within a low-lying area into which Serson Creek currently discharges and where
baseflow is channelled through a buried pipe to Lake Ontario under the WWTF. Borehole
MW12-13 is located east of the low lying drainage area. Based on the field standard penetration
test results, the relative density of the soils were typically compact to very dense.
No reported concentrations of inorganic parameters, PHCs, PAHs or VOCs were reported in
soils analyzed from boreholes MW12-11 to MW12-16 except for a reported concentration of
cadmium reported in fill at MW12-14 (refer to Drawing 350500-3). The extent of this one
instance has not been delineated and, in and of itself, is not a significant issue in the absence of
confirmation sampling. Should serious consideration be given to the future realignment of
Serson Creek, then we would recommend that additional sampling be carried out in the vicinity
of the reported cadmium concentration in fill soil to confirm the significance and extent of this
soil condition.
Groundwater was measured at depths of 4.99 to 7.23 mbgs. Groundwater testing, including at
MW12-14, did not report any concerns with all analysis meeting the applicable MOE SCS.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013
DCS
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1-1
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK.......................................................................................................... 2-1
3.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 FIELD METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................... 3-1
3.1.1 Borehole Advancement and Soil Sampling ............................................. 3-1 3.1.2 Headspace Soil Vapour Testing............................................................... 3-2 3.1.3 Groundwater Monitoring Installations..................................................... 3-2 3.1.4 Groundwater Levels & Sampling ............................................................ 3-3 3.1.5 In-situ Field Hydraulic Conductivity Tests.............................................. 3-3 3.1.6 Borehole and Groundwater Monitoring Well Elevation Survey ............. 3-4
3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................... 3-4 3.2.1 Shoreline .................................................................................................. 3-5
3.2.1.1 Fill ........................................................................................... 3-5 3.2.1.2 Native Soils ............................................................................. 3-6 3.2.1.3 Bedrock ................................................................................... 3-8
3.2.2 Proposed Serson Creek Re-alignment ..................................................... 3-8 3.2.2.1 Fill ........................................................................................... 3-8 3.2.2.2 Native Soils ............................................................................. 3-9 3.2.2.3 Bedrock ................................................................................. 3-10
3.3 VOLATILE SOIL GAS VAPOURS ........................................................................... 3-10 3.3.1 Shoreline ................................................................................................ 3-11 3.3.2 Proposed Serson Creek Realignment..................................................... 3-12
3.4 HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS....................................................................... 3-12 3.5 NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID ........................................................................... 3-14
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY TESTING......................................................... 4-1 4.1 SHORELINE ........................................................................................................... 4-1
4.1.1 Soil Analyses ........................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Groundwater Analyses............................................................................. 4-2
4.2 PROPOSED SERSON CREEK RE-ALIGNMENT .......................................................... 4-3 4.2.1 Soil Analyses ........................................................................................... 4-3 4.2.2 Groundwater Analyses............................................................................. 4-4
4.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL........................................................... 4-5 4.4 QA/QC RESULTS .................................................................................................. 4-6
5.0 CONTAMINANT DISTRIBUTION............................................................................... 5-1 5.1 SHORELINE ........................................................................................................... 5-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) PAGE
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013
DCS
5.1.1 Soil ........................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.2 Groundwater ............................................................................................ 5-3
5.2 PROPOSED SERSON CREEK RE-ALIGNMENT .......................................................... 5-3 5.2.1 Soil ........................................................................................................... 5-3 5.2.2 Groundwater ............................................................................................ 5-4
6.0 DISCUSSION.................................................................................................................. 6-1 6.1 SHORELINE ........................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 PROPOSED SERSON CREEK REALIGNMENT............................................................ 6-2
7.0 CLOSURE ....................................................................................................................... 7-1
8.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS................................................................................. 8-1
LIST OF APPENDICES AT REAR OF REPORT A Standard Procedures B Borehole Logs C Laboratory Analytical Certificates LIST OF TABLES FOLLOWS PAGE 2-1 Supplementary Environmental Investigation..........................................on page 2-4 3-1 Summary of Soil Vapour Results >100 ppm ........................................on page 3-11 3-2 Summary of Groundwater Elevations...................................................on page 3-12 4-1 Results of Analysis for Inorganic Parameters in Soil .......................................... 4-2 4-2 Results of Analysis for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in
Soil ....................................................................................................................... 4-2 4-3 Results of Analysis for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Soil ...... 4-2 4-4 Results of Analysis for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil ............... 4-2 4-5 Results of Analysis for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Soil ..................... 4-2 4-6 Results of Analysis for Distilled Water Leachate................................................ 4-2 4-7 Results of Analyses for Inorganic Parameters in Groundwater........................... 4-3 4-8 Results of Analyses for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in
Groundwater ........................................................................................................ 4-3 4-9 Results of Analyses for PAHs in Groundwater ................................................... 4-3 4-10 Results of Analyses for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in
Groundwater ........................................................................................................ 4-3 4-11 Results of Analysis for Inorganic Parameters in Soil .......................................... 4-4 4-12 Results of Analysis for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in Soil ..... 4-4
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) PAGE
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013
DCS
4-13 Results of Analysis for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PAHs in Soil ......... 4-4 4-14 Results of Analysis for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil ............... 4-4 4-15 Results of Analyses for Inorganic Parameters in Groundwater........................... 4-5 4-16 Results of Analyses for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in
Groundwater ........................................................................................................ 4-5 4-17 Results of Analyses for PAHs in Groundwater ................................................... 4-5 4-18 Results of Analyses for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in
Groundwater ........................................................................................................ 4-5 LIST OF FIGURES FOLLOWS PAGE 1-1 Key Plan............................................................................................................... 1-1 LIST OF DRAWINGS AT REAR OF REPORT 350500-1 Borehole/Monitoring Well Location Plan 350500-2 Groundwater Contour Plan 350500-3 Soil Contaminant Distribution 350500-4 Groundwater Contamination Distribution Plan
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 1-1
DCS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Region of Peel, with the assistance of the City of
Mississauga and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) are undertaking an
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Lakeview Waterfront Connection Project (LWC
Project). TRCA is managing the EA on behalf of the CVC and the Region of Peel.
The goal of the LWC Project is to create a new natural waterfront park that will establish
ecological habitat and public linkages on the eastern Mississauga waterfront. The LWC Project
has the potential to re-establish wetlands, meadows, beaches, streams and forest habitats while
providing for passive recreation opportunities to allow the public to enjoy these re-established
features) that will provide access to and ecological enhancements on the eastern Mississauga
waterfront between Marie Curtis park and Ontario Power Generation’s Lakeview site.
The LWC Project intends to create a land base to the south of the existing G.E. Booth Waste
Water Treatment Facility (WWTF). Decommissioning Consulting Services (DCS) was retained
by the TRCA to conduct a supplementary environmental investigation within the lands
comprising the LWC Project Study Area, the area identified to create ecological habitat and
public linkages. The general location of the LWC Project Study Area is shown on Figure 1-1.
The purpose of the supplementary environmental investigation was to obtain current information
on the environmental conditions of the soil and groundwater adjacent to the proposed
development area. The results of the investigation will be used in the EA to undertake the
screening level assessment of Alternative LWC Project Configurations (‘Alternative Methods’)
for the shoreline development as well as the detailed assessment of the Preferred Alternative for
the LWC Project.
A secondary purpose of the investigation was the assessment of subsurface (soil and
groundwater) conditions in a proposed re-alignment routing of Serson Creek that would connect
Serson Creek to Applewood Creek and divert base flow from Serson Creek through a newly
constructed stream channel into Applewood Creek.
An interim memorandum was prepared describing the preliminary results of the investigation in
August 2012. This report provides details of the environmental investigation work undertaken at
the LWC Project Study Area including a description of the field methodologies employed during
the course of the work and a presentation and discussion of the findings of the investigation.
BH12-13
MW12-1
MW12-2
MW12-3
MW12-4
MW12-5
MW12-6
MW12-7
MW12-8
MW12-9
MW12-10
MW12-14
MW12-16
MW12-11
MW12-12
BH12-15
LAKEVIEW WATERFRONT
CONNECTION EA
BOREHOLE AND MONITORING WELL
LOCATION PLAN
SEPT. 2012 1:4000± 350500-1
P.A.L. M.W. 350500
Drawn By:
Date:
Scale:
NOTES:
REVISIONS:
No. Date: By: Revisions
APPROX. SCALE 1:4000±
00 100 150 metres
REFERENCE:
LEGEND:
BOREHOLE LOCATION (DCS, 2012)
MONITORING WELL LOCATION (DCS , 2012)
Approved By:
Drawing No:
Project No:
SUPPLEMENTARY ENVIRONMENTAL
INVESTIGATION
50
LAKE LEVEL ELEVATION MEASURING POINT
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 2-1
DCS
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of the supplementary environmental investigation is summarized on Table 2-1.
TABLE 2-1
SUPPLEMENTARY ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION
LABORATORY TESTING BOREHOLE ID RATIONALE
DEPTH (m)
MONITORING
WELL SOIL GROUNDWATER
SHORELINE
MW12-1 Southwest corner of WWTF adjacent to proposed cool
water estuary, bank swallow habitat and
wetland.
Borehole location atop ridge constructed of
incinerator ash generated from sewage treatment
10.98 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (2) PAHs (2) VOCs(2)
Distilled Water Leach (1)
Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
MW12-2 South of ash lagoons adjacent to proposed bank swallow habitat, wetland
and meadow.
Borehole location atop bank constructed of incinerator
ash generated from sewage treatment
13.11 Yes Inorganics (3) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
Distilled Water Leach (1)
Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
MW12-3 South of ash lagoons adjacent to proposed cool
water estuary, bank swallows habitat and
wetland.
Borehole location atop bank reportedly constructed of incinerator ash generated from sewage treatment
9.15 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
--
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 2-2
DCS
LABORATORY TESTING BOREHOLE ID RATIONALE
DEPTH (m)
MONITORING
WELL SOIL GROUNDWATER
MW12-4 Southeast of ash lagoons adjacent to proposed
wetland and bank swallow habitat.
Borehole location at east
extent of ridge constructed of incinerator ash generated
from sewage treatment
6.4 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (3) VOCs (1) PAHs (2) PCBs(1)
Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
MW12-5 East of ash lagoons adjacent to proposed wetland..
4.27 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
MW12-6 East of ash lagoons adjacent to proposed estuary .
4.27 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (2) VOCs (2) PAHs (1) PCBs(1)
Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
MW12-7 Southeast of WWTF to characterize near shore
native soil and groundwater conditions in area of land
creation
4.88 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (2) VOCs (2) PAHs (2)
Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
MW12-8 Land creation portion of WWTF adjacent to
proposed wetland and meadow.
4.88 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (2) VOCs (2) PAHs (2) PCBs(1)
Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
MW12-9 Land creation portion of WWTF adjacent to proposed wetland.
6.71 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (2) VOCs (1) PAHs (1) PCBs(1)
Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
MW12-10 Western extent of Marie Curtis Park at eastern extent
of proposed shoreline improvements
3.05 Yes Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
PROPOSED SERSON CREEK RE-ALIGNMENT
MW12-11 Western extent of Serson Creek
7.93 Yes Inorganics (2)
Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
MW12-12 Western extent of Serson Creek
9.15 Yes Inorganics (2)
Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 2-3
DCS
LABORATORY TESTING BOREHOLE ID RATIONALE
DEPTH (m)
MONITORING
WELL SOIL GROUNDWATER
MW12-13 West extent of proposed realignment channel to characterize soil and
groundwater conditions along channel route.
7.32 No Inorganics (2)
--
MW12-14 Proposed re alignment channel to characterize soil and groundwater conditions
along channel route. Adjacent to parking lot.
7.93 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (3) VOCs (1) PAHs(1)
Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1
MW12-15 Proposed re alignment channel to characterize soil and groundwater conditions
along channel route. Adjacent to parking lot.
6.10 No Inorganics (2) PAHs (1)
--
MW12-16 Proposed re alignment channel to characterize soil and groundwater conditions
along channel route.
6.71 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (1)
Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1
Quality Assurance/Quality
Control
Inorganics (4) PHCs (2) VOCs (1) PAHs (2) PCBs(1)
Inorganics (2) PHCs (2) VOCs (3) PAHs (2)
NOTES:
Inorganics – Ontario Regulation (O.Reg.) 153 metals, electrical conductivity, sodium absorption ratio, pH.
PHCs – Petroleum Hydrocarbon Compounds (fractions F1 to F4)/benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes.
PAHs – Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons.
VOCs – Volatile Organic Compounds.
PCBs – Polychlorinated Biphenyls.
The locations of the boreholes and groundwater monitoring wells are shown on
Drawing 350500-1 and were generally arranged in two groupings:
C ten boreholes (identified as MW12-1 to MW12-10) were drilled to depths of
approximately 8.0 metres below ground surface (mbgs) adjacent to the proposed
land creation development area that borders the southern limit of the WWTF.
Groundwater monitoring wells were installed at each of these locations; and
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 2-4
DCS
C six boreholes (identified as MW12-11, MW12-12, BH12-13, MW12-14, BH12-15
and MW12-16) were advanced to depths of approximately 8.0 mbgs within the
proposed Serson Creek re-alignment route; four (identified by the prefix MW12-)
that were completed as groundwater monitoring wells.
Excess soil cuttings generated during advancement of the boreholes were containerized in 205 L
steel drums with sealable lids and stored on site as directed by WWTF staff.
The groundwater information collected at each well location included:
• stabilized groundwater levels;
• observation of evidence of contamination including, discolouration, odours, and
sheen;
• presence of a non aqueous phase liquid layer;
• field sampling parameters including, temperature, pH, conductivity and redox
potential;
• samples: and
• hydraulic conductivity information from field tests conducted on selected wells.
Soil and groundwater samples were collected at each borehole and groundwater monitoring well
location and tested for a selection of potential contaminants including inorganic substances,
petroleum hydrocarbon compounds (PHCs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). In addition, two
composite soil samples were prepared and subjected to distilled water leachate testing. Details
of the laboratory analyses carried out are included on Table 2-1.
Prior to the initiation of the field activities, DCS staff arranged for and completed (with the
assistance of WWTF staff), subsurface utility locates for the areas of investigation.
An elevation survey of the borehole and monitoring well locations was completed at the
conclusion of the field activities.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-1
DCS
3.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
The field work was completed under the full-time supervision of DCS field personnel. Detailed
field procedures can be found in Appendix A. This program was not intended to be consistent
with nor satisfy the requirements of Ontario Regulation (O.Reg.) 153/04 – Records of Site
Condition – Part XV.1 of the Act as amended. However, the field investigations were conducted
in general concordance with the requirements of O.Reg. 153/04.
3.1 FIELD METHODOLOGY
All work was carried out in general accordance with the Standard Field Procedures included in
Appendix A.
3.1.1 Borehole Advancement and Soil Sampling
The environmental subsurface characterization program was carried out from 25 June 2012 to
5 July 2012. A total of 16 boreholes (MW12-1 to BH12-16) were advanced to depths of 3.05 m
to 13.11 m with 14 of these locations completed as groundwater monitoring wells. The
boreholes were advanced using a Dietrich D-50 Turbo track mounted drill rig equipped with
hollow stem augers and operated by a two-man crew supplied by Profile Drilling.
Soil samples were recovered with the use of a 51 mm diameter, 760 mm long, split-spoon
sampler, over the full depth of the boreholes as shown on the individual borehole logs included
in Appendix B. The soil samples were examined at the time of collection for general soil
classification purposes (including type, texture, colour, and moisture characteristics) as well as
for evidence of environmental impacts (odour, staining, presence of foreign debris, sheens and
the presence of free product).
Following field logging, the soil samples were placed into clean 250 mR amber glass jars for all
analyses except VOCs and F1 fraction PHCs, which were collected with a “Terracore”
disposable sampling device and placed into laboratory supplied 40 mL amber glass vials
containing a fixed amount of methanol, as required by Ministry of the Environment (MOE) field
sampling protocols. Once the soil samples had been recovered, examined and placed into the
sterile glass jars, the samples were stored in an insulated cooler complete with freezer packs to
ensure a cool environment during shipment under chain-of-custody protocols to the laboratory
for analysis.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-2
DCS
Field decontamination procedures of the sampling equipment are provided in Appendix A.
Excess soil cuttings were placed in sealable 205 L steel drums and stored on the property at a
location determined by WWTF staff.
3.1.2 Headspace Soil Vapour Testing
Headspace soil vapour measurements of the individual soil samples were collected with the use
of a Gastech model 1314 (Gastech), a portable instrument capable of measuring vapour
concentrations in parts per million (ppm in the range of 0 to 500 ppm) or lower explosive limit
(LEL in the range of 0 to 100 % LEL) ranges. The precision of the instrument is +- 5 ppm or +-
5% LEL depending on the operating mode of the instrument. Instrument accuracy is +- 5 %.
The readings were obtained from a small quantity of soil that was placed into sealable plastic
bags after which the soil sample was broken apart (as needed) to release soil vapour. The
readings were collected by piercing the top of the sealed plastic bag with the tip of the instrument
probe. The results were noted on the borehole logs for subsequent evaluation. The headspace
vapour profile for each borehole (included on the individual borehole logs in Appendix B) was
assessed to identify likely zones of elevated organic contaminants in the soil column and to assist
in the selection of samples for laboratory analytical purposes.
3.1.3 Groundwater Monitoring Installations
Boreholes MW12-1 to MW12-12, MW12-14 and MW12-16 were completed as groundwater
monitoring wells. The monitoring well locations are shown on Drawing 350500-1.
Monitoring well installation details are presented on the borehole logs in Appendix B.
Monitoring wells were constructed using 55 mm diameter Schedule 40 PVC Triloc riser pipe
with 3.0 m long No. 10 slot intake zone (screen) except foe MW12-10 that, due to its’ shallow
depth, was equipped with a 1.5 m long screen length. No glues or solvents were used in the
construction of the wells to avoid introducing volatiles into the well and, thereby, biasing the
analytical results. Silica sand was placed around and to a height of at least 300 mm above the top
of the well screen as a gravel pack. The remaining annular space was sealed with bentonite. A
metal stick-up lockable protective casing was grouted in place at the top of the well.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-3
DCS
As required under O.Reg. 903 a well record must be submitted to the MOE for the monitoring
well array that was installed during this project. The well record was submitted to the MOE by
the MOE-licensed well driller who installed the well.
3.1.4 Groundwater Levels & Sampling
A “Waterra” inertial pump affixed to an appropriate length of PVC tubing was installed in each
well to facilitate well development and purging activities and the recovery of samples without
any opportunity for cross-contamination from other wells. After the initial development of the
wells on 30 July 2012 and a minimum 24-hour period of recovery, water levels were collected on
1 and 2 August 2012 from the monitoring wells. The water levels were collected with an
electronic interface probe capable of detecting both aqueous and non-aqueous liquids and
recorded on the individual borehole log (refer to Appendix B). During the collection of the
groundwater samples, observations of the evidence of environmental impacts in the groundwater
were noted including the presence of odours, sheens or the formation of a non-aqueous phase
liquid (NAPL).
After measurement of the water levels and prior to the collection of the groundwater samples, the
monitoring wells were purged to ensure that representative groundwater samples are recovered.
The collection of stabilized field groundwater quality parameters (pH, temperature, conductivity
and redox potential) after each groundwater purging event indicated that representative
groundwater conditions for sampling were achieved.
Groundwater samples were recovered from the monitoring well through the inertial pump
directly into sterile glass or plastic sample jars that have been pre-treated with preservatives,
where appropriate. Sample jars were obtained directly from the laboratory and, when filled,
shipped back to the laboratory for analysis in a sealed insulated cooler box. For analyses of
metals, the groundwater sample was pumped from the well through a WaTerra Hydropore
0.45 um cartridge filter to eliminate suspended solids. Samples destined for organic analyses
were obtained in an unfiltered condition. In both cases, the samples were retained in a marked
sample jar to which a sample label identifying the well number, date of recovery and other
pertinent information was affixed. The sample jars were filled to the brim to eliminate
headspace air to reduce the possibility of oxidation and degassing. Sample bottles were then
stored in the insulated cooler and protected from freezing pending shipment to the laboratory.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-4
DCS
3.1.5 In-situ Field Hydraulic Conductivity Tests
Formation permeability (groundwater flow characteristics) was assessed by conducting field
falling head tests carried out in selected monitoring wells (MW12-1, MW12-8, MW12-12 and
MW12-16) on 1 and 2 August 2012. The change in water level effected through the falling head
test method was measured at set time intervals with a water level indicator and recorded in the
field. Well information recorded at the time of testing included well radius (r), screened interval
length (L), gravel pack radius (R), height of the phreatic surface above an arbitrary datum (H),
the height of the water column in the well at the cessation of pumping (Ho) and the height of the
water column in the well at each measurement interval t (h).
3.1.6 Borehole and Groundwater Monitoring Well Elevation Survey
At the completion of field activities an elevation survey was completed on 14 and
15 August 2012 to establish the geodetic elevation at each newly-installed borehole/monitoring
well location. Surveyed elevations for the newly-installed borehole and groundwater monitoring
wells were referenced to a geodetic elevation located on the north face at the east corner of an
office building located east of the site at 1352 Lakeshore Road East. The benchmark, identified
as BM #102 has a geodetic elevation of 184.401 m [source: KMK B&V Site Plan General
Legend and Notes, G.E. Booth (Lakeview) Waste Water Treatment Plant Aeration Tank
Extension, Drawing number G1 of 12, Sheet Number 3 of 86, January 2008 (file reference
2952-A-113)].
3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The soil and groundwater conditions, as encountered in the boreholes and groundwater
monitoring wells installed during the current investigation, are documented in the detailed
borehole logs contained in Appendix B and summarized in the following sections. It should be
noted that subsurface conditions may vary between and beyond the boreholes drilled across the
property.
In addition, standard penetration resistance (N-value) of the soil in the borehole was recorded
during the borehole drilling. The detailed blow counts are provided in the borehole logs
contained in Appendix B.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-5
DCS
3.2.1 Shoreline
3.2.1.1 Fill
Sand and Gravel
A surface layer of sand and gravel fill was encountered in boreholes MW12-1 through MW12-9
extending to depths of 0.61 to 4.27 mbgs and at a depth of 6.55 to 8.54 mbgs in MW12-1. The
surficial sand and gravel fill layer is brown, dry to damp and contains trace silt. Locally at
MW12-1, it was intermixed with trace ash from 0.61 to 1.22 mbgs. The sand and gravel fill
identified at depth in MW12-1 is grey, moist to wet containing trace ash. A fragment of a plastic
bag was found within this fill layer.
The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be dense based on the standard
penetration test “N” values. Trace to some asphalt fragments were found in the sand and gravel
fill in MW12-4 from surface to a depth of 2.44 mbgs. A moderate petroleum hydrocarbon odour
was detected in the sand and gravel layer in borehole MW12-4 from 0.61 to 4.27 mbgs.
Ash
An ash layer, generated from the WWTF incinerator process, was encountered underlying the
sand and gravel layer at MW12-1 (1.22 to 6.55 mbgs), MW12-2 (0.61 to 9.91 mbgs) and
MW12-3 (0.61–to 6.86 mbgs). The ash layer was described as red with a powdery texture, damp
to moist and locally intermixed with silty sand and gravel at MW12-1 and containing wood
fragments in MW12-2 from 7.32 to 7.93 mbgs.
The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be very loose to loose based on
the standard penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
Silt
Silt fill was encountered in boreholes MW12-1 (8.54 to 10.36 mbgs) and MW12-3 (6.86 to
8.53 mbgs) underlying the ash fill layer. The silt fill is brown to grey/black, wet, with trace sand.
The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be very loose to loose in
MW12-1 and compact to dense in MW12-3 based on the standard penetration test “N” values.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-6
DCS
Trace asphalt fragments were identified in the silt fill in MW12-3 at 7.93 mbgs. A medium
petroleum hydrocarbon odour was noted in the silt fill in MW12-1 at depth of 9.76 to
10.21 mbgs and a solvent odour was noted in the interval 10.21 to 10.36 mbgs.
Silty Sand to Sandy Silt
Silty sand to sandy silt was identified underlying sand and gravel fill at MW12-5 from 1.68 to
2.44 mbgs, MW12-6 from 0.46 to 3.66 mbgs and at MW12-8 from 1.83 to 2.44 mbgs (silty sand)
and 2.44 to 3.66 mbgs (sandy silt). This fill layer is brown (MW12-5 and MW12-6) to grey
(MW12-8), damp to moist with trace to some sand and trace gravel. Locally in MW12-5, this
layer contains some clay.
The relative density of the silty sand to sandy silt fill was determined to be very loose at
MW12-5, loose to compact at MW12-6 and very loose to compact at MW12-8 based on the
standard penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
Sand
Locally at MW12-9, a sand fill layer was identified from 3.05 to 3.81 mbgs separating the
overlying sand and gravel fill from the underlying native sand and gravel fill. This layer was
brown, moist to wet with trace gravel.
The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be compact based on the
standard penetration test “N” values. A piece of geotextile was found in the sand fill at
MW12-9. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
3.2.1.2 Native Soils
Silt Till
Silt till was identified underlying fill at MW12-1 (10.36 to 10.98 mbgs), MW12-2 (9.91 to
12.81 mbgs), MW12-3 (8.53 to 9.15 mbgs) and MW12-7 (4.27 to 4.88 mbgs). Boreholes
MW12-1, MW12-3 and MW12-7 were terminated in this unit.
The silt till is brown to grey, wet with trace to some sand and trace gravel.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-7
DCS
The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be loose to compact based on
the standard penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
Silty Sand
Silty sand was identified at MW12-4 from 4.27 to 4.88 mbgs and MW12-8 from 3.66 to 4.27
mbgs. This unit is brown to grey, wet with some clay (at MW12-4) and trace gravel.
The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be very loose to loose based on
the standard penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
Sandy Silt
Sandy silt was encountered underlying the native silty sand layer at MW12-4 (4.88 to 5.94
mbgs), silty sand to sandy silt fill at MW12-5 (2.44 to 4.27 mbgs), sandy silt fill at MW12-6
(3.66 to 4.27 mbgs) and MW12-8 (3.66 to 4.27 mbgs). Borehole MW12-5 was terminated in this
unit.
The sandy silt is brown to grey, wet with some clay and trace gravel and sand.
The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be very loose to loose based on
the standard penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
Sand
Sand was encountered underlying the silty sand from 4.11 to 4.88 mbgs in MW12-8 and
underlying sand and gravel in MW12-10 from 1.22 to 3.05 mbgs. Both boreholes were
terminated in this unit. The sand is described as brown to grey, wet with trace gravel.
The relative density of the sand was determined to be very loose to very dense based on the
standard penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-8
DCS
Sand and Gravel
Sand and gravel was encountered in MW12-9 underlying sand fill from 3.81 m to 6.71 mbgs and
MW12-10 from surface to a depth of 1.22 mbgs. The sand and gravel is described as brown and
damp to moist.
The relative density of the sand was determined to be loose to compact based on the standard
penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
3.2.1.3 Bedrock
Weathered dark grey shale bedrock was encountered underlying the silt till unit in MW12-2 at
12.81 mbgs and underlying sandy silt in MW12-4 at 5.94 mbgs.
No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
3.2.2 Proposed Serson Creek Re-alignment
3.2.2.1 Fill
Sand and Gravel
Sand and gravel fill was encountered in boreholes MW12-11, MW12-12, BH12-13, MW12-14
and BH12-15 from the ground surface to a maximum depth of 1.52 mbgs at MW12-11. The
sand and gravel fill was generally described as brown to locally grey below 610 mm, dry to
damp, with trace silt in BH12-15. Locally at MW12-11, a crushed stone layer, most likely part
of the rail spur bedding material, was encountered from 0.91 to 1.52 m.
The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be dense based on the standard
penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
Silty Sand
Silty sand was identified in MW12-13 underlying sand and gravel from 0.61 to 2.44 mbgs. This
layer was grey to brown, moist and contained traced gravel. From 1.22 to 1.83 mbgs, this layer
comprised fine sand. Below 1.83 mbgs, the silty sand became more silty.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-9
DCS
The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be loose based on the standard
penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
Sandy Silt
Sandy silt was encountered underlying the sand and gravel layer at MW12-14 from 0.61 to
1.83 mbgs. The sandy silt was described as grey and black, moist with trace gravel.
The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be loose based on the standard
penetration test “N” values. A septic odour was noted in the sandy silt fill in MW12-14 from
0.61 to 1.22 mbgs. No other evidence of environmental impacts was reported.
3.2.2.2 Native Soils
Sandy Silt Till
Sandy silt till was encountered underlying fill at each of the boreholes placed along the proposed
realignment of Serson Creek (MW12-11 to MW12-16). It was identified from 1.52 to 3.66 mbgs
in MW12-11, 1.83 to 3.66 mbgs in MW12-12, 2.44 to 4.88 mbgs in BH12-13, 1.83 to 4.27 mbgs
in MW12-14, 1.37 to 3.05 mbgs in BH12-15 and 1.22 m to 3.05 mbgs in MW12-16.
The sandy silt till is generally brown, moist with trace gravel. Locally this unit becomes wet and
contains some gravel.
The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be compact to very dense based
on the standard penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
Sand
Sand was encountered underlying the sandy silt till unit in boreholes MW12-11, MW12-14,
MW12-15 and MW12-16 at depths of 3.05 mbgs (MW12-15 and MW12-16, 3.66 mbgs
(MW12-11) and 4.27 mbgs (MW12-14) and underlying the sand and gravel unit at MW12-11
from 6.71 to 7.93 mbgs and in MW12-12 from 7.62 to 9.15 mbgs. The sand is generally brown
or grey, moist to wet with trace silt and gravel.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-10
DCS
The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be dense to very dense based
on the standard penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
Sand and Gravel
Sand and gravel was encountered underlying sand at MW12-11 from 5.49 to 6.71 mbgs and
underlying sandy silt till in MW12-12 from 3.66 to 7.62 mbgs and in BH12-13 from 4.88 to
7.32 mbgs. The sand and gravel is typically described as brown to grey, moist, with some silt and
some gravel.
The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be very dense based on the
standard penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.
3.2.2.3 Bedrock
Bedrock was not encountered in any of the boreholes put down within the proposed Serson
Creek realignment.
3.3 VOLATILE SOIL GAS VAPOURS
Each soil sample recovered from the individual boreholes put down during the DCS
investigation was monitored for the presence of total volatile organic vapours and these
observations were recorded on the field logs. Headspace measurements were taken for each
bagged sample recovered with the use of a portable vapour monitor (Gastech) to identify the
presence of volatile organic vapours in the soil. The headspace vapour profile for each borehole,
shown on the individual borehole logs included in Appendix B, was assessed to identify likely
zones of elevated organic contaminants in the soil column and to assist in the selection of
samples for analytical purposes.
Soil sample locations where soil vapour screening measurements were measured in excess of
100 ppm are summarized in Table 3-1.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-11
DCS
TABLE 3-1
SUMMARY OF SOIL VAPOUR RESULTS >100 ppm
BOREHOLE I.D. SOIL SAMPLE
INTERVAL (m)
SOIL VAPOUR
CONCENTRATION (ppm)
OTHER OBSERVATIONS
SHORELINE
MW12-1 2.44 - 3.05 100 Incinerator ash, no odour or staining.
3.05 - 3.66 100 Incinerator ash, no odour or staining.
4.88 - 5.49 10 Incinerator ash, no odour or staining.
5.49 - 6.1 150 Incinerator ash, no odour or staining.
9.76 - 10.37 200 Silt fill, some sand, moderate petroleum hydrocarbon, solvent odour.
10.37 - 10.98 150 Silt till, no odour or staining.
MW12-2 6.10 - 6.74 150 Incinerator ash, no odour or staining.
6.71 - 7.32 100 Incinerator ash, no odour or staining.
7.32 - 7.93 125 Incinerator ash, no odour or staining.
PROPOSED SERSON CREEK REALIGNMENT
MW12-12 7.62 - 7.93 150 Sand, no odour or staining.
MW12-14 0.61 - 1.22 200 Sandy silt fill, septic odour.
1.22 - 1.83 100 Silt till, no odour or staining.
3.0 - 3.66 200 Sandy silt till, no odour or staining.
MW12-15 5.79 - 6.10 150 Sand, no odour or staining.
MW12-16 4.88 - 5.49 110 Sand, no odour or staining.
5.49 - 6.10 480 Sand, trace silt, no odour or staining.
3.3.1 Shoreline
The headspace vapour readings ranged from a minimum value of 0 ppm to a maximum value of
200 ppm, with the majority of the results measured below 100 ppm. Reviewing the results of the
soil vapour headspace screening measurements, the majority of the soil vapour measurements in
excess of 100 ppm were reported in MW12 -1 and MW12-2 within the incinerator ash layer.
The highest measurement reported (200 ppm) was found in MW12-1 in the interval of 9.76 to
10.37 m, comprising a silt (some sand) fill identified below the ash layer at this location that
exhibited moderate petroleum odours. Samples of soil from this interval were submitted to the
laboratory for testing of PHCs and VOCs.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-12
DCS
3.3.2 Proposed Serson Creek Realignment
The headspace vapour readings ranged from a minimum value of 0 ppm to a maximum value of
480 ppm, with the majority of the results measured below 100 ppm. There was no evidence of
any significant staining or odours indicative of a potential environmental concern except for the
detection of a septic odour at MW12-14 in the interval 0.61 to 1.22 m.
3.4 HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS
Groundwater levels were collected by DCS from the monitoring wells installed by DCS during
the current investigation on 1 and 2 August 2013. These well locations are shown on Drawing
350500-1. The recorded groundwater elevations collected by DCS on 1 and 2 August 2012 are
summarized on Table 3-2.
TABLE 3-2
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
MONITORING
WELL ID GROUND
SURFACE
ELEVATION (masl)
DATE OF
GROUNDWATER
MEASUREMENTS
STATIC
WATER DEPTH
MEASURED
FROM GROUND
SURFACE (m)
GROUNDWATER
ELEVATION (masl)
PRODUCT
LEVEL (mm)
DEPTH TO
BOTTOM
MEASURED
FROM GROUND
SURFACE (m)
SHORELINE
MW12-1 83.54 2-Aug-12 8.08 75.46 0 10.98
MW12-2 83.79 2-Aug-12 7.63 76.16 0 8.65
MW12-4 77.11 2-Aug-12 3.04 74.07 0 4.75
MW12-5 76.80 2-Aug-12 2.27 74.53 0 4.27
MW12-6 77.33 1-Aug-12 2.83 74.50 0 4.27
MW12-7 77.26 2-Aug-12 3.21 74.05 0 4.05
MW12-8 77.21 1-Aug-12 3.39 73.82 0 4.88
MW12-9 77.44 1-Aug-12 3.63 73.81 0 6.20
MW12-10 75.28 2-Aug-12 1.36 73.92 0 2.22
PROPOSED SERSON CREEK REALIGNMENT
MW12-11 82.67 1-Aug-12 6.39 76.28 0 7.32
MW12-12 82.21 1-Aug-12 7.23 74.98 0 8.78
MW12-14 83.35 1-Aug-12 6.20 77.15 0 7.92
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-13
DCS
MONITORING
WELL ID GROUND
SURFACE
ELEVATION (masl)
DATE OF
GROUNDWATER
MEASUREMENTS
STATIC
WATER DEPTH
MEASURED
FROM GROUND
SURFACE (m)
GROUNDWATER
ELEVATION (masl)
PRODUCT
LEVEL (mm)
DEPTH TO
BOTTOM
MEASURED
FROM GROUND
SURFACE (m)
MW12-16 81.11 1-Aug-12 4.99 76.12 0 6.30
NOTE: masl metres above sea level.
Groundwater within the overburden was measured at depths of 1.36 to 8.08 mbgs that
corresponds to elevations of 73.81 to 77.15 m above sea level (masl). Groundwater elevations
collected in August 2012 are shown on Drawing 350500-2 and infer a southerly direction of
lateral groundwater flow.
Lake surface elevations were also collected at the time of the groundwater levels. The two
locations where lake levels were collected (readily available access) are shown on Drawing
350500-3 (LL1 and LL2). The recorded elevations were 73.88 m (LL1) and 73.82 m, (LL2).
The groundwater elevations measured in the overburden monitoring wells aligned along the lake
front (MW12-1 to MW12-10) occurred approximately 0.2 to 2.3 m above the water elevation of
the lake with the groundwater elevation in three wells (MW12-8 to MW12-10) measured at
approximately lake level. The groundwater elevations measured in overburden of the wells
aligned along the proposed Serson Creek route (MW12-11, MW12-12, MW12-14 and
MW12-16) occurred approximately 1.1 to 3.3 m above the water elevation of the lake.
The horizontal gradient is calculated as the mathematical slope of the phreatic surface between
two reference points on a site, hence:
21 HH
i
where, i = the hydraulic gradient,
H1 - H2 = difference in hydraulic head, and
R = horizontal distance in metres.
A horizontal gradient of 0.027 was calculated for the overburden groundwater flow based on the
August 2012 results.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 3-14
DCS
Field rising head permeability tests, completed by DCS in wells MW12-1, MW12-8, MW12-12
and MW12-16, indicated hydraulic conductivities of 4.8x10-7 m/sec in MW12-1, 2.2x10-6 m/sec
in MW12-8, 1.9x10-6 m/sec in MW12-12 and 1.1x10-6 m/sec in MW12-18. Assuming porosity
is 0.30, the calculated horizontal groundwater velocity in shallow overburden ranges from 1.36
to 6.23 m/year.
3.5 NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID
No evidence of a light (floating) or dense (sinking) phase separated NAPL was found in any of
the well locations monitored during the current program.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 4-1
DCS
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY TESTING
The soil and groundwater samples recovered for environmental testing were submitted to AGAT
Laboratories, a CALA-certified commercial environmental laboratory facility located in
Mississauga, Ontario, for chemical analysis.
Soil samples and groundwater samples were collected for analytical testing during the course of
this investigation. The results of the testing have been compared against the applicable generic
site condition standards (SCS) provided in the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) document
entitled “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use under Part XV.1 of the
Environmental Protection Act, dated 15 April 2011 (the MOE SCS). Samples collected from the
boreholes and monitoring wells placed within 30 m of the lake (MW12-1 to MW12-10), the
results were compared to the SCS provided in Table 9 of the MOE SCS. Samples collected from
the boreholes and monitoring wells placed within the proposed re-alignment of Serson Creek
(MW12-11 to MW12-16), the results were compared to the SCS provided in Table 3 of the MOE
SCS.
Soil samples, selected on the basis of visual, olfactory and headspace organic vapour evidence of
environmental impacts, were tested for the presence of inorganic and general chemistry
parameters, PAHs, PHCs, VOCs and PCBs. Where no readily identifiable evidence of such
contamination was present samples were selected to be representative of the strata encountered
4.1 SHORELINE
4.1.1 Soil Analyses
Laboratory chemical testing was carried out on a total of:
twenty-two samples (including two blind field duplicate samples) were selected
for metals and general inorganic analysis;
eighteen samples (including one blind field duplicate samples) for PHCs (F1 to F4
fractions plus BTEX) analysis;
fifteen samples (including one blind field duplicate samples) samples for the
presence of PAHs analysis;
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 4-2
DCS
fifteen samples (including one blind field duplicate samples) were selected for
VOCs analysis;
five samples (including one blind field duplicate samples) were selected for PCBs
analysis; and
two composite samples for distilled water leachate analysis.
The results of the current laboratory analyses, with reference to applicable MOE Standards, have
been incorporated into the following chemical summary tables:
Table 4-1 Results of Analysis for Inorganic Parameters in Soil;
Table 4-2 Results of Analysis for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs);
Table 4-3 Results of Analysis for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in
Soil;
Table 4-4 Results of Analysis for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil;
Table 4-5 Results of Analysis for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Soil; and
Table 4-6 Results of Analysis for Distilled Water Leachate.
4.1.2 Groundwater Analyses
Laboratory analyses were carried out on a total of:
ten samples (including one blind field duplicate sample) for metals and general
inorganic analysis;
ten samples (including one blind field duplicate sample) for PHCs (F1 to F4
fractions plus BTEX) analysis;
ten samples (including one blind field duplicate sample) for PAHs analysis; and
TABLE 4—i
RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR INORGANIC PARAMETERS IN SOIL
. MWI 2-2 MWI 2-2 MWI2-B (Dup)MWI2-1 MWI2-1 SSI3 MWI2-2 SSII 6.10- SSIB 10.36- SS18 10.36-
MOE Standards SS7 3.66-4.27m 7.32-7.92m SS8 4.27-4.88m 6.Tlm lO.97m 10.9Th,Parameters Table 9* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/28/2012 6/28/2012 6/28/2012 6/28/2012 6/28/2012 6)28/2012(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse
Antimony 1.3 0.8 6.8 0.8 6.2 7 <0.8 <0.8Arsenic 18 I 10 8 10 II 7 7Barium 220 2 1110 107 1050 1110 47 49Beryllium 2.5 0.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 0.9Boron 36 5 8 14 9 8 15 16Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 1.5 0.10 1.04 1.24 1.04 1.04 2.7 2.5Cadmium 1.2 0.5 5.5 1.4 6.7 8.2 <0.5 <0.5Chromium 70 2 179 49 169 250 26 28Cobalt 0.5 8.2 12.1 8 9.3 15.8 15.8Cope 92 — I 1630 115 1550 1640 27 26Lead 120 I 109 35 96 154 9 10.0Molybdenum 2 0.5 17.1 3.2 15.9 16 <0.5 0.5Nickel 82 I 68 32 66 79 32 33Selenium 1.5 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Silver 0.5 0.2 49.3 3.8 43.7 49.4 0.2 <U2Thallium 1 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Uranium 2.5 0.5 7.1 0.8 7.6 7.1 0.6 0.6Vanadium 86 1 33 31 35 40 33 32Zinc — 290 5 1630 179 1470 1610 75 79Chromium VI 0.66 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 ISQ <0.2 <0.2Cyanide 0.05i 0.040 <0.040 <0.040 — <0.040 —- <0.040 <0.040 — <0.040Mercury —~_________ 0.27 0.10 1.26 0.11 0.95 1.42 <0.10 <0.10Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.7 0.005 0.957 0.371 1.1 133 0.555 0.483Sodium Adsorption Ratio 5 N/A 1.11 0.663 1.11 1.11 1.49 2.2pH, 2:1 CaCI2 Extraction 6.95 7.6 6.74 ISQ 7.84 8.07
Note:All parameter values in pglg (ppm) un!eaa ollierwiae indicated
Bold Exceeds Rcaidential/Pakland/Tnstitutional/lndustrial/
CommerciallConia,unity Land Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m ofa Waler Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province ofosrario Soil, Ground Waler and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.I ofthe EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
Not detected
ISQ insufficient sample
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 -005 - September 2013 Page I of 4
TABLE 4-1RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR INORGANIC PARAMETERS IN SOIL
. MWI2-3 MWI2-3 MWI2-4 MWI2-5 MW12-5SS1O 5.49- 3814 7.92- MW12-4 MWI2-D (Dup) 886 3.05- SS3 1.22- SS5 2.44-
MOE Standards 6.lOm 8.53m SS2 0.61 -1 .22m SS2 O.61-1.22m 3.66m 1.83m 3.05mParameters
Table 9* ROLNon-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/28/2012 6/2812012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27120 12 6/27/2012 6/2712012
(t5/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse
Antimony 1.3 0.8 10 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8Arsenic 18 I 8 3 3 3 3 5 4Barium 220 -. — 2 1240 73 36 47 42 58 64Beryllium 2.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.6Boron 36 5 5 6 <5 5 5 - 8 7Boron (Hot Water Soluble) -~ 1.5 0.10 0.93 — 1.33 0.82 - - 0.83 0.96 0.54 0.45Cadmium 1.2 0.5 17.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chromium —— 70 — 2 278 19 — 9 10 — II 19 19Cobalt 22 — 0.5 11.2 6.9 3.7 4.1 4.6 9.8 9.2Copper 92 I 1550 21 18 18 14 20 19Lead ~0 I 331 24 24 - 20 12 10 8Molybdenum 2 0.5 9.6 -— <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Nickel 82 — 1 108 14 8 .? 9 18 18Selenium 1.5 - 0.4 <04 <0.4 0.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 -
Silver 0.5 -- 0.2 419 0.4 <0.2 <0.2 -- <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Thallium I 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 -- ~0.4 <0.4 <0.4Uranium 2.5 0.5 5.2 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.5Vanadium 86 I 32 26 20 21 21 26 27Zinc - 290 —~______ 5 1510 56 33 33 31 46 46Chromium VI 0.66 0.2 <0.2 <0,2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Cyanide 0.051 0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Mercury —________ 0.27 0.10 —— 1.38 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 - <0.10 <0.10Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.7 0.005 1.1 1.46 0.296 0.334 0.36 0.848 0.358Sodium AdsorptionRatio 5 N/A______ 0.878 7.14 0.336 0.358 1.41 0.313 0.294
pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction 6.91 7.75 7.52 7.55 7.4 7.64 7.55Note,
All paeaneter valuea in pg/g (ppn) unless oihtrwise indicated
Exceeds RosidentiaUpaklandllnatitutional/InduatriaY
Connercial/Conmunity Land Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 ne ofa Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
Province ofontario Soil, Ground Waler and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.I ofilse EPA, April, 2011
Reported Detection Limit
Not detected
intufftcieat aanple
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013
Bold
*
RDL
lSQ
Page 2 of 4
TABLE 4-1RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR INORGANIC PARAMETERS IN SOIL
. MW12-6 MWI2-6 MWI2-7 MW12-7 MW12-8 (Dup) MWI2-8 MWI2-9SSIA 0- 553 1.22- 552 0.61- 557 3.66- 553 1.22- SS3 1.22- S87 3.66- SS2 0.61-
MOEStandards 0.46m 1.83m 1.22m 4.lIm 1.83m l.83m 4.ZYm 1.22mParameters
Table 9* RDLNon-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/2712012 6/27/2012 6127/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012
(15104/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse CoarseAntimony t.3 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8Arsenic 18 I 8 3 8 5 5 5 5 5Barium 220 2 51 43 50 44 70 77 66 72Beryllium 2.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5Boron 36 5 9 5 17 II 7 7 7 5Boron(HotWaterSoluble) 1.5 0.10 0.32 0.18 3.74 0.94 0.44 0.5 0.48 0.18Cadmium 1.2 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chromium 70 2 16 II 27 22 21 24 23 19Cobalt 22 0.5 7.8 — 5.4 —- 18.3 10.4 8.8 9.6 10 8 -—
Copper 92 I 94 II 25 36 25 24 22 41Lead 120 I 38 5 37 20 23 19 19 20Molybdenum 2 0.5 0.7 <0.5 0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9Nickel 82 I IS II 34 21 18 19 20 15Selenium 1.5 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Silver 0.5 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Thallium 1 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Uranium — 2.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5Vanadium 86 I 23 19 —— - 32 23 28 31 29 25Zinc 290 5 98 27 70 68 59 61 53 58Chromium Vt 0.66 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Cyanide 0.051 0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Mercury 0.27 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.13Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.7 0005 0.207 0.151 2.7 0.767 0.506 0.513 0.298 0.62SodiumAdsorption Ratio - 5 N/A 0.153 0.587 0.556 0.91 1.81 1.96 2.4 8.15p11, 2:1 CaCI2 Extraction 7.6 7.74 7.71 9.62 7.64 166 7.68 7.66
Note:All parameter valuer in jtgig (ppm) unless otitenvise indicated
Bold Exceeds ResidentiallPaklandllnntitutionalflndnatsial/
Contn,ereint/Comninnity Land Use . Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
far Uae within 30 m ot’a Water Body in a Non-potable Groundwater Condition
* Province ofontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.t ofthe EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reperted Detectien Limit
Not detected
ISQ insufficient sample
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 3 of4
TABLE 4-1RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR INORGANIC PARAMETERS IN SOIL
. MW12-9 MWI2-108S4 2.29- 882 0.61-
MOE Standards 2.59m 1.22mParameters Table 9* RUt
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/27/2012 6/27/2012(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse
Anlimony 1.3 0.8 <0.8 <0.8Arsenic IS I 5 3Barium 220 2 38 45Beryllium -— 2.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Boron 36 5 5 <5Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 1.5 0.10 0.34 0.24Cadmium 1.2 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 —
Chromium 70 — 2 19 IICobalt 22 0.5 4.1 3.3Copper 92 I 32 38Lead 120 I 24 29Molybdenum 2 0.5 1.7 0.6Nickel 82 I Il 8Selenium 1.5 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 -
Silver 0.5 0.2 <0.2 <0.2Thallium —_______ I 0.4 <0.4 <0.4Uranium - 2.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Vanadium -- 86 I 13 12Zinc 290 5! 53Chromium VI 0.66 0.2 ISQ <0.2Cyanide 0.051 — - 0.040 ISQ <0.040Mercury — 0.27 0.10 <0.10 <0.10Electrical Conduelivity (2:1) 0.7 0.005 0.451 0.151Sodium AdsoeptionRatio 5 N/A 4.1 1.02pH, 2:1 CaCI2 Extraction TSQ 7.85
Note:All parameter values in pgig (ppm) unless othenvise indicated
Bold Exceeds Reaidentiallpaklandflnstitutionaliladtsstrialj
CommercinllContmunity Land Use - Table 9 Geaeric Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m ofa Waler Body ia a Non-Potable Groundwater Conditisa
* rrovittce ofOntario Soil, Ground Water and Sedimeat Standards for Use
Under Pars XV.t ofthe EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Linus
Not detected
ISQ insufficient sample
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 -005- September 2013 Page 4 of 4
TABLE 4-2
RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AND PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN SOIL. MWI2-1 MWI2-1 MWI2-2 MWI2-4
SSI7A9.75- 5S18 10.36- SSII 6.10- MWI2-3 SS3 1.22-MOE Standards 10.21m 10.97m 6.llm SSI2B 6.86-7.32m 1.83m
Parameters Table 9* ROL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/2912012 6/2912012 6128/2012 6128/2012 6/27/2012
(15/0412011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse
Benzene 0.02 0.02
Toluene -- 0.2 0.08
Ethylbenzene 0.05 0.05
Xylene Mixture 0.05 0.05
Fl(C6toClO) 25 5 6 <5 <5 <5 <5
Fl (C6 to ClO) minus BTEX 5 6 <5 <5 <5 <5
F2(ClOtoCl6) 10 10 <10 <10 <10 48
F3(Cl6toC34) 240 50 <50 <50 <50 360
F4(C34toC5O) — 120 50 <50 —- <50 <50 <50
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 50 NA NA NA NA
Moisture Content - —— —__________ 0.1 13.8 -— 34 8.2 10.7
Terphenyl (surrogate) Acceptable Limits 60-140% 118 140 128 73
Note:
All parameter values in pglg (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds Residential/Paklandllnstitutional/industrial/
Commercial/Community Land Use. Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province ofOntario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.t of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
Not detected
Supplementary SLibstirface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005- September 2013 Page I of 4
TABLE 4-2
RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AN]) PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN SOIL. MWI2-4 MWI2-4 MWI2-5 MW12-6 MWI2-6 MWI2-7
SS5 2.44- SS8 4.27- SS5 2.44- SS5 2.44- 557 3.66- SS4 1.83-MOE Standards 3.05m 4.88m 3.05m 3.05m 4.27m 2.44m
Parameters Table 9* ROL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6127/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse
Benzene 0.02 0.02 <0.02 <0.02
Toluene 0.2 0.08 <0.08 <0.08Etliylbenzene 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Xylene Mixture 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Fl(C6toC1O) 25 5 6 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Fl (C6 to ClO) minus BTEX 5 6 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
F2(CIOtoCl6) 10 10 55 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
F3(Cl6toC34) 240 50 150 65 <50 76 <50 69
F4 (C34 to C50) 120 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 50 NA NA NA NA NA NA
Moisture Content 0.1 9.7 12.1 16.3 11.7 20.4 15.9
Terphenyl (surrogate) Acceptable Limits 60-140% 91 72 -- - 95 69 65 94
Note:
All parameter values in pg/g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds Residential/Paklandllnstitotional/lndustrial/
Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province ofOntario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.l of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
Not detected
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfroat Connection LA350500—005- September 2013 Page 2 of 4
TABLE 4-2
RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AM) PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN SOIL
. MWI2-7 MWI2-8 MWI2-8 MWI2-9SS6 3.05- SS5 2.44- SS8 4.27- MWI2-H (Dup) SS5 3.05-
MOE Standards 3.66m 3.05m 4.88m SS8 4.27-4.88m 3.66mParameters Table 9* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Coaditioa 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse ~-. Coarse
Benzeae 0.02 0.02
Toluene -- 0.2 0.08
Ethylbenzene 0.05 0.05
Xylene Mixture 0.05 0.05
F1(C6toCl0) 25 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Fl (C6toClO)minusBTEX 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
F2(ClOtoCl6) 10 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
F3(Cl6toC34) 240 50 <50 83 <50 <50 <50
P4 (C34 to C50) - 120 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 50 NA NA NA NA NA
MoistureContent 0.1 10.2 15.5 13.2 14.4 7.1
Terphenyl (surrogate) Acceptable Limits 60-140% 81 102 126 116 127
Note:
All parameter values in pg/g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds Residential/Pakland/lnslitutional/tndustrial/
Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m of a Waler Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.! of the EPA, April. 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
Not detected
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005- September 2013 Page 3 of 4
TABLE 4-2
RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AND PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN SOIL. MWI2-9 MWI2-10
SS7 4.57- SS3 1.83-MOE Standards 5.18m 2.44m
Parameters Table 9* ROL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6127/2012 6/27/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse
Benzene 0.02 0.02
Toluene 0.2 0.08
Ethylbenzene 0.05 0.05
Xylene Mixture - 0.05 0.05F1(C6toClO) 25
Fl (C6 to ClO) minus BTEX 5 <5 <5
F2(ClOtoCl6) 10 10 <10 <10
F3(Cl6toC34) 240 50 100 <50
P4 (C34 to C50) 120 50 <50 <50
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 50 NA NA
Moisture Content 0.1 16.2 13
Terphenyl (surrogate) Acceptable Limits 60-140% 123 135
Note:
All parameter values in pg/g (ppm) unless othenvise indicated
11 old Exceeds Residential/Pakland/tnstitutional/tndustrial/
Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 9 Genetic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 3Cm of a Waler Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Pars XV.l of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
Not detected
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLnkeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005- September 2013 Page 4 of 4
TABLE 4-3RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAils) IN SOIL
. MWI2-1 MWI2-2 MWI2-3 MWI2-4SSI3 7.32- MWI2-1 SS8 4.27- SSI4 8.08- SS2 0.61-
MOE Standards 7.92m SSI7A 9.75-10.21 4.88m 8.53m I .22mParameters Table 9* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/2812012 6/28/2012 6/28/2012 6/28/2012 6/27/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse
Naphthalene 0.09 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Acenaphtliylene 0.093 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Acennphthene 6.072 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Fluorene 0.19 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Phenanthrene 0.69 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.13
Anthracene -- - -- 0.22 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Fluoranthene - 6.69 0.05 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 0.07
Pyrene 1 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.24
Benz(a)anthracene 036 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06
Chrysene 2S 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.14
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.47 0.05 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 0.05
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.48 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.3 0.05 <0.05 — 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 0.07
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.23 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 03 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.68 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06
2-and I-methyl Naphthalene 0.59 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.23
Moisture Content 0.10% 6.8
Chtysene-dlZ (Surrogate) 50-140% 60.00 62 78 59 106
Note:
All parameter values in pgig (ppm) unless othenvise indicated
B old Exceeds Residential/Pakland)lnstitutional)lndustrial/
Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m ofa Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.I of the EPA, April, 2011
RUL Reported Detection Limit
Not detected
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005-September 2013 Page I of 3
TABLE 4-3
RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PATh) IN SOIL
. MWI2-4 MWI2-5 MWI2-6 MWI2-7MWI2-D (Dup) SS6 3.05- SS3 1.22- SSS 1.22- S53 1.22-
MOE Standards SS2 O.61-1.22m 3.66m I .83m 1.83m I .83mParameters Table 9* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/27/2012 6127/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse
Naphthalene 0.09 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Acenaphthylene 0.093 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Acenaphthene 0.072 0.05 <0.05 <OMS <0.05 <DM5 <0.05
Fluorene - -— -~ 0.19 DM5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Phenanthrene 0.69 0.05 0.13 0.09 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Anthracene 0.22 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Fluoranthene 0.69 0.05 0.12 0.08 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Pyrene 1 0.05 0.21 0.12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Benz(a)anthracene 0.36 0.05 0.07 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Chrysene 2.8 0.05 0.13 0.08 <DM5 <0.05 <0.05
Benzo(b)tluorarithene 0.47 005 0.08 0.05 <0.05 <0M5 <DM5
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.48 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.3 0.05 0.09 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
lndeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene 023 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Dibenz(a,h)aathracene 0.1 - 0.05 <0.05 <DM5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.68 0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 <0M5 <0.05
2-and I-methyl Naphthalene 0.59 0.05 0.13 0.16 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Moisture Content -- 0.10% 6.6 16.2 10 9.2 11.3
Chrysene-d12 (Surrogate) 50-140% 106 93 86 78 76
Note:
All parameter values in pg/g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds Residentiat/Paklandllnstitutional/tndustrial/
Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 3Dm of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.t of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
Not detected
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005- September 2013 Page 2 of 3
TABLE 4-3
RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PARS) IN SOIL
. MWI2-7 MWI2-8 MWI2-8 MWI2-9 MWI2-9 MWI2-10SS5 2.44- SS2 0.61- SS6 3.05- SS2 0.61- SS6 3.81- SS2 0.61-
MOE Standards 3.05m 1.22m 3.66m 1.22m 4.27m 1.22mParameters Table 9* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse
Naphthalene 0.09 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthylene 0.093 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Acenaphthene 0.072 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Fluorene 0.19 — 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Phenanthrene 0.69 - 0.05 <0.05 0.19 0.53 <0.05 0.05 <0.05
Aiwacene 0.22 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.13 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Fluoranthene —~ 0.69 0.05 <0.05 0.27 0.83 0.05 0.09 0.06
Pyrene 1 0.05 <0.05 0.24 0.67 <0.05 0.12 0.05
Benz(a)anthracene 036 0.05 <0.05 — 0.12 0.35 <0.05 0.05 <0.05
Chrysene 2.8 0.05 <0.05 0.11 0.33 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.47 0.05 <0.05 0.13 0.29 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.48 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.11 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.3 0.05 <0.05 0.12 0.3 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
lndeno(I,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.23 0.05 <0.05 — 0.06 0.15 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.1 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene —- 0.68 0.05 <0.05 0.06 0.14 —— <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
2-and I-methyl Naphthalene 0.59 0.05 <0.05 —— <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Moisture Content 0.10% 9.3 8.9 17.1 7.7 II 8.5
Chrysene-d12 (Surrogate) 50-140% 81 74 86 72 79 63
Note:
All parameler values in pg/g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds Residential/Pakland/tnstitulional/lndustrial/
Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Slandards
for Use within 30 m of a Waler Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province of Ontario Snil, Ground Waler and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.l of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
Not detected
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005- September 2013 Page 3 of 3
TABLE 4-4RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs) IN SOIL
. MWI2-i MWI2.1 MWI2-6 MWI2-7 MWI2-85517*9.75- 5518 10.36- MWI2-2 MWI2-3 MW124 MWI2.5 5552.44- MWI2-0 554 1.93• MWI2-7 SS5 2.44-
MOE Stondurdo 10.21m W.07m 5/Oh 6.10-SlIm 55120 6.06-7.32m 553 1.22-l.83m 555 2.44-3.05m 3.05m 557 3.66-4.27m 2.44m 556 3.05-3.6Gm 3.05mParameters T.bleS° ROT.
Non-Potable Grnuodw.Ier CondItIon 6(21(2012 612912012 6(2812012 6(2012012 6(2712012 6(21(2012 6(27/2012 611712012 6(2111012 6(2712012 6.’27/2012(15/0412011) resTore Coarse Coorse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coorse Coarse Coarse Coarse Ceerse
Dieletorodi000romelhaoe 0.05 0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <005
~j5/yl Chiseide —— 0.02 —— - 0 <0,02 - <0,02 <0.02 — <0,02 <0,02 <0.02 — (0.02 <0.02 <0,02 <0,02 — <0.02
Beomotoethane 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0,05
Teiehloeofluoeoroeahnce 0.25 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Acetone 0.5 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 — <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
.1~!oipcrnyIcoe ~._._~!~__~___ ..5°r~ 10555 <0.05_. <0.05 —- <0.05 -— <0,05 5
~5~!iYi9S!#2~! — — 0.05 —~ 0.05 -— ‘c~ —— <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05 <0.05Tmot-I.2-Oicldoroelhylene 005 0.05 cOOS -— — cOOS <005 - <0555 <0555 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <5/05 .05 4005
MeIIeyIOeeO.bcIylEther 0.00 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0005
l,I-Dichloeeetltnne 0.05 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <002
Mb~!Jç9!20L, 0.5 050 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 —- <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <050 -
Cit. I,2-Oiclnloeoellrylec< 0.05 0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 wO.02__ <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 —— <0.02 <002
Chtsesfoms 005 0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <9,04
I .2-Dicltloeocthane 0.05 0.03 <0.01 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.03 <0.03 <0.02 <0,05
I,l,I-Teichloroclhnec 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
CanbotoTeleachloride 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Bennzeoe 0.02 0.02 <0.02 <0,02 <0,02 <0,92 <0,02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
I,2-Oiehloenpeopane — 0.05 0.02 <0.02 ~ <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 — <0.03 <0.05 <0.02
Trichloroelleylme 005 0.05 <0.02 <0.05 — — <0.0! <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.05 <0.03 <0.05 <0.02
Beomodichloromeileaee 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Melhy,ll79~ynI (clone 0.5 -— 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 — <0.50 <0.50 -— <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
Ij.I’Tdchloreethnne 0.05 0554 <004 <004 <004 <004 <004 <024 .04 <024<004 <0554 <0004
Tolurne 0.2 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Dibromochloromelhace 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Ethylene Dibromide - 0.05 0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0,04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
Telrochlorselhylene - 0.05 0.05 <0.05 -— <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.03
1.1.1 .I’Tcirnclnloroctlrune 0.05 -.______________ 0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 —— - <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
Chlorobeozeec 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Elloylbeocene 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
m & p-Xyleene —____________________________________ 0.05 — — <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 —. <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 -~ — <0.05 <0,05
j~0-0m, 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05
S55tecne 0.05 0.05 <0,05 —— <0.05 —. <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 —
I,O.2.2-Teeeuclnloeoenhaec 0.05 0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02
o-Xylece -________________________________________ 0.05 — -— <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05 <0.05
l.5-Dichlorohenzene 0.05 0.05 <0,05 — <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05
0,4-Diehlorobcnzene 0.05 0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
l,2-Oirltlorobcnzeoe 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05
Xylene Mixoure 0.05 0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0,05 <0,05 <0555 <0,05
13-Dicitloropropcne 0.05 0.04 <0.04 <004 <5/04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0,04 <0,04 <0,04 <0,04
o-Hercarte 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05
Toluene-d0 122 03 022 102 90 97 97 97 90 97 97
4-rsrounolluorohenzene —- 94 92 95 70 00 96 97 94 05 90 90
All pnneelee ‘duos is ~ig (ppm) ootess otlieraire indicated
Bold Enceedo OeoidontjaliPoklasdjlonnjiaeiso,Orodosldal(
CmnrnnereiaVCsrsn,onity Land Use- Table9 Generic Sian Cosditiso Stasdando
Is, Use within Sonora Ovate, Body inn Nor’Pot.ble Geosuodsoote, Condition
Prancer ofOolaria Soil, Ground Water and Sod/rent Sloe/arIa I<~ Use
Undo, Paso XV. I <(line EPA, April, 1011
ROT. Reposnod Dotoeliona List/I
Non detected
Sopplemeolary Soboorrace Toveoolgaolo.oLaken’iew WalerfrooO Coooecllon F_A350500-005-Se1nle’oh,r2013 Pagel ofl
TABLE 4-4RESULTS 01? ANALYSES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs) IN SOIL
MW12~ MWI2-i4 (Sup) MWI2-9 MWI1-9 MWI2-10MOE Sl.nrlardo 558 4.27-4.88m 558 4.27-4.88m SOS 3.05-loom SOT 4.57-Slam SOS l.8S-2.44m
roromelers Table 9° ROL
Nou-PoiabIc Groundwaler ConditIon 6/27/2012 6127/2012 6127/1012 6/17/1012 6/17/1002
(15104/20115 Tcxtnre Cn.rne Coot*e Coarse Coarse Coarse
Diololoredinusoro’neiha’ae 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <005 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05
Vinyl COlon/c 0.02 — 0.02 <0.02 — <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0,02
Bromometlisne 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <005 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Triehloeofloornmelhane —~ - - 025 — 0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Aeelnne 0.5 0,50 <0,50 <0,50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
1.LPSS~Y?0L~ 0.05 ~ -
MelliyleneChIo*ide 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 —
Trans’ l,2-Oichlorneilsylene 0.05 0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Methyl ient.bntyl Eisner 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05
I,l’Diehlnroellisne 0.05 0.02 <0.02 <002 <0,02 <0,02 <0.02
MeihylEthylKes’ne -- 0.5 0.50 <0.50<030 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
Cis- l.2-Oichloenenlsylene — 0.05 0.02 <0.02 <002 <0.02 <0.02 <0,02
Chloroform 0.05 0.04 *0.04 <0,04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
l,2-Dichlorneibnne 0.05 0.03 <0.03 <0,05 <0,03 <0.03 <0.05
l,l,l-Teichlonoeihase 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05
Carbon Telraclilonide 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05
loenzene 0.02 0.02 <0.02 <002 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
l,2-Diclaloeopeopane - 0.05 0.03 <0.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.05 <0,03 ——
Tnichlornciliylcne 0.05 0,05 <0,03 <0,05 <0.03 <0.03 — <0.03
Bromodichlnromethane 0.05 0,05 -- <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
MeIhyIlcobolyl Kcioae 0.5 , — 0,50 <0.50 <0,50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
l,l,2-Tnichloroeihaoe 0.05 0.04 ‘*0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0,04 <0.04
Totoene 0.2 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 “*0.05
Oibroonochloromeihaae 0.05 0.05 ‘*0.05 <005 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
ç9~~yIeoe Dibromide , 0.05 0.04 <0.04 <004 <0.04 <0554 <0.04
Teieachloro*ihyleec 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <005 <0.05 <0.05 , <0.05
l,l,I,2-Tcieachlorocihae* 0.05 - 0.04 <0.04 <004 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
Chloroheozeine —~ 0.05 —— 0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Ethylbenzeoe 0.05 0.05 — <0.05 — <0,05 ‘*0.05 <0.05 <0.05
m&p-Xyleme 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 ‘*0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Bromol’orei 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <005 ‘*0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Siyrcne 0.05 0.05 <0.03 <005 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
l,l,2,2-Telraclnloreelhane — 0.05 0.05 ‘*0.05 <005 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
n-Xylem 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
l.3-Dichlombcnzene 0.05 0.03 <0.05 <005 <0.05 ‘*005 <0.05
l,4-Diclilorobenzene 0.05 —~ — 0.05 <0.05 <005 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
l,2-Diehloeobenzene 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05
Xylcne Mirelore 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <005 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05
l,3’D,j5j5~owsropeec 0.05 —— 0.04 <0.04 <004 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
n’llexane 0,05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ~0.05 <0.05 <0.05
ToloemedO - 0 05 50 97 95
4.Bromofloorobcszene 00 95 57 02 95
~51~All paeae*eier ssiues ri pe’g non) ‘elms oihees4it lodiesied
Bold En-reds eenjdetisi/Oelciar.djirniiineiioesrJindsot.isr/
Ce.emeitiol/Cemsriarriiy Land Ui’ - Table 0 Generic S/in Coed/i/on Stosdord.
lee Use esiihio 300 ols Water Body in a Nen-Perobie Greondonoer Coed/i/en
* PeooireeofoensoioSoil. Giossd Wareranid Sediment Sian/se/n lorUne
Under Pant XV. I nOb. EPA, April, 2011
ROL Reported Deieeiioe Liniii
* N<deieored
Supplementary Sobsorfnce loses liguliooLukesrieno W’oierlrnni Conneellon EA350500—005’ Seplember 2003 Psgc 2 *12
TABLE 4-5RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) IN SOIL
MWI2-1 MWI2-4 MWI2-4 MWI2-6 MWI2-8SSI7A 9.75- SS3 1.22- 5852.44- S83 1.22- SSS 1.22- MWI2-H(Dup)
MOE Standards 10.21m 1.83m 3.05m 1.83m 1.83m SS3 1.22-1.83mParameters Table 9* RDL RilE
Noa-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/29/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse
Aroclor 1242 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.! 0.3 <0.3
Aroelor 1248 0.! <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.! 0.3 <0.3
Aroc!or 1254 0.! <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3
Aroclor 1260 0.! <0.! <0.! <0.! <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3
Polychiorinated Biphenyls 0.3 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3
Decachlorobiphenyl (Surrogate) Acceptable Limits 60-140% 0.1 88 92 88 73 92 0.3 84
Moishare Content 0.1 10.7 9.7 8 11.2 0.1 11.4
Note:
All parameter values in itg1g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds Residential/Pakland/lnstitutional/lndustriall
Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 9 Genetic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m ofa Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Coadition* Province ofOntario Soil, Grouad Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.! of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
Not detected
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005- September 2013 Page I of!
TABLE 4-6RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR DISTILLED WATER LEACHATE
Composite of MWI2-1 Composite of MWI2-2Parameters SS17A & MWI2.4 17B SS8, SSII, SSI8, SS4
Unit RDL
6/2812012 6/28/2012Metals and Inorganics in Soil
Arsenic Leachate mg/U 0.010 <0.0 10 0.044Barium Leachate mg/U 0.100 0.549 0.183
Boron Leachate mg/U 0.050 <0.050 0.077
Cadmium Leachate mg/U 0.010 <0.010 <0.010
Chromium Leachate mg/U 0.010 <0.010 <0.010
Lead Leachate mg/L 0.010 0.036 <0.010
Mercury Leachate mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.0!
Selenium Leachate mg/U 0.010 <0.010 <0.010
Silver Leachate mg/U 0.010 <0.010 <0.010
Uranium Leachate mg/U 0.050 <0.050 <0.050
FluorideUeachate mg/L 0.05 0.3 0.13
Cyanide Ueachate mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05
(Nitrate + Nitrite) as N Ucachate mg/L 0.7 <0.7 <0.7
PAHs in Soil
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/U 0.001 <0.001 <0.001
VOCs in Soil
Vinyl Chloride mg/L 0.03 <0.030 <0.030
1,1 Dichloroethene mg/U 0.020 <0.020 <0.020
Dichioromethane mg/U 0.030 <0.030 <0.030
Methyl Ethyl Ketone mg/L 0.090 <0.090 <0.090
Chloroform mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.020
I 2-Dichloroethane mg/U 0.020 <0.020 <0.020
Carbon Tetrachloride mg/U 0.020 <0.020 <0.020
Benzene mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.020
Trichloroethene mg/U 0.020 <0.020 <0.020
Tetrachloroethene mg/U 0.050 <0.050 <0.050
Clilorobenzene mg/U 0.010 <0.010 <0.010
1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.010
1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/U 0.010 <0.010 <0.010
Toluene-d8 mgJL 108 122
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page I of 2
TABLE 4-6RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR DISTILLED WATER LEACIIATE
Composite of MW12-1 Composite of MWI2-2Parameters SSI7A& MW124 17B SS8, SSII, SSI8, SS4
Unit RDL
6/28/2012 6/28/2012
PHCs in Soil -
Benzene ~WL 20 <20 <20
Toluene pg/L 20 <20 <20
Ethylbenzene ig/L 10 <10 <10Xylenes (Total) 1sg/L 14 <14 <14C6-C10(Fl) ~sg/L 1000 <1000 <1000C6-C10(FlminusBTEX) gg)L 1000 <1000 <1000
c”lO - C16 (F2) gg/L. 100 3000 <100
016-C34(F3) 1ig/L 500 6400 850
C>34-C50 ggJL 500 1200 <500
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons ~ig/L 500 NA NA
Note:Not detected
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005- September 2013 Page 2 of2
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 4-3
DCS
ten soil samples (including one blind field duplicate sample) were selected for
VOCs analysis.
The results of the current laboratory analyses have been incorporated into the following chemical
summary tables that, with reference to applicable MOE Standards, are provided in the tables
listed below:
Table 4-7 Results of Analyses for Inorganic Parameters in Groundwater;
Table 4-8 Results of Analyses for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in
Groundwater;
Table 4-9 Results of Analyses for PAHs in Groundwater; and
Table 4-10 Results of Analyses for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in
Groundwater.
The laboratory analytical reports for the testing carried out are included in Appendix C. A
discussion of the laboratory quality control and quality assurance (QA/QC) procedures is
included in Appendix A.
4.2 PROPOSED SERSON CREEK RE-ALIGNMENT
4.2.1 Soil Analyses
Laboratory chemical testing was carried out on a total of:
fourteen samples (including two blind field duplicate sample) were selected for
metals and general inorganic analysis;
four samples for PHCs (F1 to F4 fractions plus BTEX) analysis;
three samples (including one blind field duplicate sample) samples for the
presence of PAHs analysis;
TABLE 4-7RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR INORGANIC PARAMETERS IN GROUNDWATER
MOE StandardsMW12-1 MW12-2 MW12-4 MW12-5 MW12-6 MW12-7
Table 9*
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/1/2012 8/2/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures
Antimony 16000 0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 1.1 0.8
Arsenic 1500 1.0 33.4 16.5 2.8 6.4 6.0 5.7
Barium 23000 2.0 202.0 251.0 359.0 115.0 88.3 126.0
Beryllium 53 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Boron 36000 10.0 596.0 947.0 438.0 450.0 89.6 777.0
Cadmium 2.1 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Chromium 640 2.0 5.3 3.9 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0
Cobalt 52 0.5 20.8 24.7 7.3 44.6 19.4 9.1
Copper 69 1.0 1.9 1.9 1.6 2.1 1.5 1.3
Lead 20 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Molybdenum 7300 0.5 55.1 37.5 1.1 8.2 4.9 2.3
Nickel 390 1.0 27.2 32.7 13.6 46.7 29.8 14.2
Selenium 50 1.0 3.3 3.1 2.1 <1.0 1.2 <1.0
Silver 1.2 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Thallium 400 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.3 <0.3
Uranium 330 0.5 6.5 16.1 0.5 28.2 16.5 2.7
Vanadium 200 0.4 4.8 3.7 2.6 3.1 1.7 3.4
Zinc 890 5.0 52.1 <5.0 32.9 42.7 17.1 19.2
Mercury 0.29 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
Chromium VI 110 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Cyanide 52 2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2
Sodium 1800000 500 231000.0 172000.0 217000.0 48400.0 29400.0 153000.0
Chloride 1800000 100 176000.0 223000.0 257000.0 157000.0 63000.0 374000.0
Nitrate as N 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 401.0
Nitrite as N 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
Electrical Conductivity (uS/cm) 2 2660.0 2670.0 2140.0 1960.0 1300.0 1920.0
pH (pH Units) NA 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.8 8.0
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
ParametersRDL
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 1 of 2
TABLE 4-7RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR INORGANIC PARAMETERS IN GROUNDWATER
MOE Standards
Table 9*
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
(15/04/2011) Texture
Antimony 16000 0.5
Arsenic 1500 1.0
Barium 23000 2.0
Beryllium 53 0.5
Boron 36000 10.0
Cadmium 2.1 0.2
Chromium 640 2.0
Cobalt 52 0.5
Copper 69 1.0
Lead 20 0.5
Molybdenum 7300 0.5
Nickel 390 1.0
Selenium 50 1.0
Silver 1.2 0.2
Thallium 400 0.3
Uranium 330 0.5
Vanadium 200 0.4
Zinc 890 5.0
Mercury 0.29 0.02
Chromium VI 110 5
Cyanide 52 2
Sodium 1800000 500
Chloride 1800000 100
Nitrate as N 50
Nitrite as N 50
Electrical Conductivity (uS/cm) 2
pH (pH Units) NA
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
ParametersRDL
MW12-8 MW12-9 MW12-10 MW12-D
8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012
All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures
1.0 0.8 0.9 <0.5
7.9 4.0 3.9 3.0
92.9 109.0 699.0 486.0
<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
95.1 64.8 477.0 472.0
<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0
5.2 <0.5 0.9 7.8
1.6 <1.0 1.2 1.7
1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
4.5 4.3 0.8 1.0
10.0 <1.0 1.3 17.0
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.5
<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
<0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3
3.6 0.7 <0.5 0.6
1.8 2.0 3.2 3.7
37.7 36.7 68.2 55.7
<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
<5 <5 <5 <5
<2 <2 <2 <2
81000.0 83300.0 154000.0 223000.0
168000.0 87200.0 410000.0 257000.0
<50 <50 <50 <50
<50 <50 <50 <50
972.0 717.0 1960.0 2150.0
7.9 7.9 7.9 8.1
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 2 of 2
TABLE 4-8RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AND PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN GROUNDWATER
MOE Standards MW12-1 MW12-2 MW12-4 MW12-5
Table 9* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures
F1 (C6 to C10) 25 <25 <25 <25 <25
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 420 25 <25 <25 <25 <25
F2 (C10 to C16) 150 100 <100 <100 <100 <100
F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene NV 100 <100 <100 <100 <100
F3 (C16 to C34) 500 100 530 <100 <100 <100
F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs 500 100 530 <100 <100 <100
F4 (C34 to C50) 500 100 <100 <100 <100 <100
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 500 500 NA NA NA NA
Terphenyl 60-140 (% Acceptable Limits) 82 88 68 67
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 1 of 3
TABLE 4-8RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AND PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN GROUNDWATER
MOE Standards
Table 9* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
(15/04/2011) Texture
F1 (C6 to C10) 25
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 420 25
F2 (C10 to C16) 150 100
F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene NV 100
F3 (C16 to C34) 500 100
F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs 500 100
F4 (C34 to C50) 500 100
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 500 500
Terphenyl 60-140 (% Acceptable Limits)
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
MW12-6 MW12-7 MW12-8 MW12-9 MW12-10
8/1/2012 8/2/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/2/2012
All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures
<25 <25 <25 <25 <25
<25 <25 <25 <25 <25
<100 <100 <100 <100 <100
<100 <100 <100 <100 <100
<100 <100 <100 <100 <100
<100 <100 <100 <100 <100
<100 <100 <100 <100 <100
NA NA NA NA NA
116 84 125 88 103
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 2 of 3
TABLE 4-8RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AND PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN GROUNDWATER
MOE Standards
Table 9* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
(15/04/2011) Texture
F1 (C6 to C10) 25
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 420 25
F2 (C10 to C16) 150 100
F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene NV 100
F3 (C16 to C34) 500 100
F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs 500 100
F4 (C34 to C50) 500 100
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 500 500
Terphenyl 60-140 (% Acceptable Limits)
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
MW12-D
8/2/2012
All Textures
<25
<25
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
NA
96
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 3 of 3
TABLE 4-9RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR PAHs IN GROUNDWATER
MOE Standards MW12-1 MW12-2 MW12-4 MW12-5 MW12-6
Table 9* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/1/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures
Naphthalene 1400 0.20 0.32 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Acenaphthylene 1.4 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Acenaphthene 600 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Fluorene 290 0.20 0.22 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Phenanthrene 380 0.10 0.3 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Anthracene 1 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Fluoranthene 73 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Pyrene 5.7 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Benz(a)anthracene 1.8 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Chrysene 0.7 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.75 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.4 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.81 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.2 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.4 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.2 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1500 0.20 0.79 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Chrysene-d12 50 -140 (% Acceptable Limits) 85 75 90 80 84
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 1 of 2
TABLE 4-9RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR PAHs IN GROUNDWATER
MOE Standards
Table 9* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
(15/04/2011) Texture
Naphthalene 1400 0.20
Acenaphthylene 1.4 0.20
Acenaphthene 600 0.20
Fluorene 290 0.20
Phenanthrene 380 0.10
Anthracene 1 0.10
Fluoranthene 73 0.20
Pyrene 5.7 0.20
Benz(a)anthracene 1.8 0.20
Chrysene 0.7 0.10
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.75 0.10
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.4 0.10
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.81 0.01
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.2 0.20
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.4 0.20
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.2 0.20
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1500 0.20
Chrysene-d12 50 -140 (% Acceptable Limits)
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
MW12-7 MW12-8 MW12-9 MW12-10 MW12-D
8/2/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012
All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures
<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.64 <0.20
<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
64 81 90 86 91
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 2 of 2
TABLE 4-10RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs) IN GROUNDWATER
MOE Standards
MW12-1 MW12-2 MW12-4 MW12-5 MW12-6 MW12-7 MW12-8 MW12-9 MW12-10 MW12-D
Table 9* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/1/2012 8/2/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures
Dichlorodifluoromethane 3500 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Vinyl Chloride 0.5 0.17 <0.17 <0.34 <0.17 <0.34 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17
Bromomethane 5.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Trichlorofluoromethane 2000 0.40 <0.40 <0.80 <0.40 <0.80 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40
Acetone 100000 1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 690 340 <1.0 120 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1,1-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.30 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30
Methylene Chloride 610 0.30 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Methyl tert-butyl ether 190 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
1,1-Dichloroethane 320 0.30 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30
Methyl Ethyl Ketone 470000 1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 27 26 <1.0 4.9 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Chloroform 2.4 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
1,2-Dichloroethane 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 640 0.30 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.79 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Benzene 44 0.20 0.34 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
1,2-Dichloropropane 16 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Trichloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Bromodichloromethane 670000 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 140000 1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.7 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Toluene 14000 0.20 0.26 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Dibromochloromethane 65000 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Ethylene Dibromide 0.25 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Tetrachloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.3 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Chlorobenzene 500 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 2.2 <0.10
Ethylbenzene 1800 0.10 0.11 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
m & p-Xylene 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Bromoform 380 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Styrene 1300 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.2 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
o-Xylene 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 7600 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.34 <0.10
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4600 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
1,3-Dichloropropene 5.2 0.30 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30
Xylene Mixture 3300 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
n-Hexane 51 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Toluene-d8 50-150 (% Recovery) 98 101 105 102 97 101 96 104 99 102
4-Bromofluorobenzene 50-150 (% Recovery) 104 88 90 89 94 88 95 89 94 98
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 1 of 2
TABLE 4-10RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs) IN GROUNDWATER
MOE Standards
Table 9* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
(15/04/2011) Texture
Dichlorodifluoromethane 3500 0.20
Vinyl Chloride 0.5 0.17
Bromomethane 5.6 0.20
Trichlorofluoromethane 2000 0.40
Acetone 100000 1.0
1,1-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.30
Methylene Chloride 610 0.30
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.20
Methyl tert-butyl ether 190 0.20
1,1-Dichloroethane 320 0.30
Methyl Ethyl Ketone 470000 1.0
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.20
Chloroform 2.4 0.20
1,2-Dichloroethane 1.6 0.20
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 640 0.30
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.79 0.20
Benzene 44 0.20
1,2-Dichloropropane 16 0.20
Trichloroethylene 1.6 0.20
Bromodichloromethane 670000 0.20
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 140000 1.0
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.7 0.20
Toluene 14000 0.20
Dibromochloromethane 65000 0.10
Ethylene Dibromide 0.25 0.10
Tetrachloroethylene 1.6 0.20
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.3 0.10
Chlorobenzene 500 0.10
Ethylbenzene 1800 0.10
m & p-Xylene 0.20
Bromoform 380 0.10
Styrene 1300 0.10
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.2 0.10
o-Xylene 0.10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 7600 0.10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8 0.10
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4600 0.10
1,3-Dichloropropene 5.2 0.30
Xylene Mixture 3300 0.20
n-Hexane 51 0.20
Toluene-d8 50-150 (% Recovery)
4-Bromofluorobenzene 50-150 (% Recovery)
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
Trip Blank
8/1/2012
All Textures
<0.20
<0.17
<0.20
<0.40
<1.0
<0.30
<0.30
<0.20
<0.20
<0.30
<1.0
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.30
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<1.0
<0.20
<0.20
<0.10
<0.10
<0.20
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.20
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.30
<0.20
<0.20
97
89
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 2 of 2
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 4-4
DCS
one sample was selected for VOCs analysis.
The results of the current laboratory analyses, with reference to applicable MOE Standards, have
been incorporated into the following chemical summary tables:
Table 4-11 Results of Analysis for Inorganic Parameters in Soil;
Table 4-12 Results of Analysis for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in
Soil;
Table 4-13 Results of Analysis for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PAHs in Soil;
and
Table 4-14 Results of Analysis for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil.
The laboratory analytical reports for the testing carried out are included in Appendix C. A
discussion of the laboratory quality control and quality assurance (QA/QC) procedures is
included in Appendix A.
4.2.2 Groundwater Analyses
Laboratory analyses were carried out on a total of:
five samples (including one blind duplicate sample) for metals and general
inorganic analysis;
five samples (including one blind duplicate sample) for PHCs (F1 to F4 fractions
plus BTEX) analysis;
five samples (including one blind duplicate sample) for PAHs analysis; and
five soil samples (including one blind duplicate sample) were selected for VOCs
analysis.
TABLE 4-11RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR INORGANIC PARAMETERS IN SOIL
MOE Standards
MW12-11 SS2 0.61-
1.22m
MW12-11 SS5 2.44-
3.05m
MW12-12 SS3 1.22-
1.83m MW12-L (Dup)SS3 1.22-1.83m
MW12-12 SS10 5.49-
6.10m BH12-13
SS1 0-0.61m
BH12-13 SS4 1.83-
2.44m
Table 3* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 7/4/2012 7/4/2012 7/4/2012 7/4/2012 7/4/2012 7/4/2012 7/4/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse
Antimony 40 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8
Arsenic 18 1 2 5 5 5 8 3 4
Barium 670 2 34 92 69 69 63 55 60
Beryllium 8 0.5 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 0.6
Boron 120 5 6 11 14 14 12 6 7
Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 2 0.10 0.4 0.14 0.6 0.54 0.26 0.17 0.46
Cadmium 1.9 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Chromium 160 2 9 25 17 18 23 17 19
Cobalt 80 0.5 3.5 13.7 5.8 5.9 15.2 6.6 8.9
Copper 230 1 9 26 27 27 41 23 19
Lead 120 1 17 9 34 32 5 9 12
Molybdenum 40 0.5 0.5 <0.5 1.2 1.6 0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Nickel 270 1 7 27 12 12 27 15 17
Selenium 5.5 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4
Silver 40 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Thallium 3.3 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4
Uranium 33 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 0.9 <0.5 0.6
Vanadium 86 1 15 35 27 25 32 25 27
Zinc 340 5 71 62 91 93 68 46 54
Chromium VI 8 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Cyanide 0.051 0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040
Mercury 3.9 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 1.4 0.005 0.833 0.288 0.884 0.244 0.224 0.209 0.24
Sodium Adsorption Ratio 12 N/A 0.656 0.446 0.292 0.303 0.79 0.385 0.132
pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction 9.96 7.73 11.6 11.5 8.03 7.61 7.34
Note:
All parameter values in µg/g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds Industrial/Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 3 Full Depth
Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 1 of 2
TABLE 4-11RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR INORGANIC PARAMETERS IN SOIL
MOE Standards
Table 3* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
(15/04/2011) Texture
Antimony 40 0.8
Arsenic 18 1
Barium 670 2
Beryllium 8 0.5
Boron 120 5
Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 2 0.10
Cadmium 1.9 0.5
Chromium 160 2
Cobalt 80 0.5
Copper 230 1
Lead 120 1
Molybdenum 40 0.5
Nickel 270 1
Selenium 5.5 0.4
Silver 40 0.2
Thallium 3.3 0.4
Uranium 33 0.5
Vanadium 86 1
Zinc 340 5
Chromium VI 8 0.2
Cyanide 0.051 0.040
Mercury 3.9 0.10
Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 1.4 0.005
Sodium Adsorption Ratio 12 N/A
pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction
Note:
All parameter values in µg/g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds Industrial/Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 3 Full Depth
Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
MW12-14 SS2 0.61-
1.22m
MW12-14 SS6 3.05-
3.66m MW12-15
SS1 0-0.61m
MW12-15 SS6 3.05-
3.66m MW12-16 SS2 0.61-1.22m
MW12-P (Dup)SS2 0.61-1.22m
MW12-16 SS4 1.83-
2.44m
7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012
Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse
1.2 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8
5 4 5 2 5 5 5
84 66 72 17 72 62 67
0.6 0.6 0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7
8 8 8 <5 7 6 8
1.19 0.12 0.72 0.1 0.17 0.16 0.15
2.9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
50 20 20 7 21 18 19
8.2 12.6 6.6 2.8 9.9 8.9 11.7
54 23 26 7 24 20 25
98 9 20 3 8 7 10
1.6 <0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
30 25 16 6 23 21 28
<0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4
1 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
<0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4
0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
25 28 25 13 28 25 26
164 61 74 16 55 48 63
<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
<0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040
0.83 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
0.364 0.188 0.558 0.102 0.124 0.123 0.122
0.914 0.209 3.05 0.187 0.218 0.202 0.148
7.59 7.68 8.62 7.69 7.65 7.58 7.71
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 2 of 2
TABLE 4-12RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AND PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN SOIL
MOE Standards
MW12-14 SS2 0.61-
1.22m
MW12-14 SS6 3.05-
3.66m
MW12-14 SS13 7.32-
7.92m
MW12-16 SS10 5.49-
6.10m
Table 3* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse
Benzene 0.32 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
Toluene 68 0.08 <0.08 <0.08 <0.08
Ethylbenzene 9.5 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Xylene Mixture 26 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
F1 (C6 to C10) 55 5 8 12 <5 <5
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 5 12 <5 <5
F2 (C10 to C16) 230 10 <10 <10 <10 <10
F3 (C16 to C34) 1700 50 <50 <50 <50 <50
F4 (C34 to C50) 3300 50 <50 <50 <50 <50
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 50 NA NA NA NA
Moisture Content 0.1 13.60 13.6 13.1 17.6
Terphenyl (surrogate) Acceptable Limits 60 - 140% 93 74 78 79
Note:
All parameter values in µg/g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds Industrial/Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 3 Full Depth
Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 1 of 1
TABLE 4-13RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHs) IN SOIL
MOE Standards
MW12-14 SS2 0.61-
1.22m MW12-N (DUP IL)
SS2 0.61-1.22m MW12-15
SS1 0-0.61m
Table 3* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse
Naphthalene 9.6 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Acenaphthylene 0.15 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Acenaphthene 96 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Fluorene 62 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Phenanthrene 12 0.05 0.11 <0.05 0.05
Anthracene 0.67 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Fluoranthene 9.6 0.05 0.16 <0.05 0.22
Pyrene 96 0.05 0.14 <0.05 0.23
Benz(a)anthracene 0.96 0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.1
Chrysene 9.6 0.05 0.08 <0.05 0.16
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.96 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.15
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.96 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.3 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.13
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.76 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.08
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.1 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 9.6 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.08
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 76 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
Moisture Content 0.10% 13.5 14.2 7.8
Chrysene-d12 (Surrogate) 50-140 % 101 90 104
Note:
All parameter values in µg/g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds Industrial/Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 3 Full Depth
Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 1 of 1
TABLE 4-14RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs) IN SOIL
MOE Standards MW12-14
SS2 0.61-1.22m
Table 3* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 7/3/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse
Dichlorodifluoromethane 16 0.05 <0.05
Vinyl Chloride 0.032 0.02 <0.02
Bromomethane 0.05 0.05 <0.05
Trichlorofluoromethane 4 0.05 <0.05
Acetone 16 0.50 <0.50
1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.064 0.05 <0.05
Methylene Chloride 1.6 0.05 <0.05
Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.3 0.05 <0.05
Methyl tert-butyl Ether 11 0.05 <0.05
1,1-Dichloroethane 17 0.02 <0.02
Methyl Ethyl Ketone 70 0.50 <0.50
Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 55 0.02 <0.02
Chloroform 0.47 0.04 <0.04
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.05 0.03 <0.03
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 6.1 0.05 <0.05
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.21 0.05 <0.05
Benzene 0.32 0.02 <0.02
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.16 0.03 <0.03
Trichloroethylene 0.91 0.03 <0.03
Bromodichloromethane 18 0.05 <0.05
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 31 0.50 <0.50
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.05 0.04 <0.04
Toluene 68 0.05 <0.05
Dibromochloromethane 13 0.05 <0.05
Ethylene Dibromide 0.05 0.04 <0.04
Tetrachloroethylene 4.5 0.05 <0.05
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.087 0.04 <0.04
Chlorobenzene 2.4 0.05 <0.05
Ethylbenzene 9.5 0.05 <0.05
m & p-Xylene 0.05 <0.05
Bromoform 0.61 0.05 <0.05
Styrene 34 0.05 <0.05
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 0.05 <0.05
o-Xylene 0.05 <0.05
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 9.6 0.05 <0.05
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.2 0.05 <0.05
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 6.8 0.05 <0.05
Xylene Mixture 26 0.05 <0.05
1,3-Dichloropropene 0.18 0.04 <0.04
n-Hexane 46 0.05 <0.05
Toluene-d8 83
4-Bromofluorobenzene 129
Note:
All parameter values in µg/g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds Industrial/Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 3 Full Depth
Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 1 of 1
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 4-5
DCS
The results of the current laboratory analyses have been incorporated into the following chemical
summary tables that, with reference to applicable MOE Standards, are provided in the tables
listed below:
Table 4-15 Results of Analyses for Inorganic Parameters in Groundwater;
Table 4-16 Results of Analyses for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in
Groundwater;
Table 4-17 Results of Analyses for PAHs in Groundwater; and
Table 4-18 Results of Analyses for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in
Groundwater.
The laboratory analytical reports for the testing carried out are included in Appendix C. A
discussion of the laboratory quality control and quality assurance (QA/QC) procedures is
included in Appendix A.
4.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
Laboratory or field control checks are utilized to ensure that the quality of the analytical data is
maintained at an acceptable level. AGAT Laboratories is CALA-certified and participates in
applicable inter-laboratory testing rounds administered by provincial and federal agencies. The
procedures detailed in the MOE Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in Assessment of
Properties Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, dated 9 March 2004,
constitutes the accepted standards for chemical testing for environmental evaluation purposes in
the province (where available). In accordance with this protocol, all appropriate laboratory
quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures, including the use of spikes, replicates and
blanks, are incorporated and run a minimum of once per sample set. The QA/QC data are
returned with the laboratory reports received.
Blind field duplicate samples were prepared by obtaining a soil or groundwater sample split from
pre-selected sample locations. The splits were provided with fictitious sample identification
designations and submitted to the laboratory for analysis to permit a determination of the internal
quality control and repeatability of analyses to be determined.
TABLE 4-15RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR INORGANIC PARAMETERS IN GROUNDWATER
MOE StandardsMW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-14 MW12-16 MW12-P
Table 3*
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures
Antimony 20000 0.5 0.6 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5
Arsenic 1900 1.0 2.8 1.1 1.4 <1.0 1.0
Barium 29000 2.0 66.5 29.2 104.0 63.0 68.5
Beryllium 67 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Boron 45000 10.0 37.7 55.8 255.0 32.7 30.8
Cadmium 2.7 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Chromium 810 2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0
Cobalt 66 0.5 6.3 3.2 8.2 0.8 0.8
Copper 87 1.0 2.3 <1.0 5.1 1.4 1.2
Lead 25 0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
Molybdenum 9200 0.5 2.9 1.7 3.2 0.8 0.8
Nickel 490 1.0 8.6 3.9 17.8 2.5 2.0
Selenium 63 1.0 1.4 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Silver 1.5 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Thallium 510 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3
Uranium 420 0.5 5.3 1.8 17.8 2.9 3.1
Vanadium 250 0.4 2.2 1.0 1.5 1.6 1.8
Zinc 1100 5.0 44.8 <5.0 38.2 <5.0 <5.0
Mercury 0.29 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
Chromium VI 140 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
Cyanide 66 2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2
Sodium 2300000 500 25000.0 23600.0 45100.0 51000.0 16300.0
Chloride 2300000 100 233000.0 80600.0 119000.0 92200.0 20400.0
Nitrate as N 50 <50 <50 2440.0 1090.0 1160.0
Nitrite as N 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
Electrical Conductivity (uS/cm) 2 1430.0 1430.0 1550.0 951.0 732.0
pH (pH Units) NA 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.1 8.1
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 3 Generic Site Condition Standards
in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
ParametersRDL
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 1 of 1
TABLE 4-16RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AND PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN GROUNDWATER
MOE Standards MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-14 MW12-16
Table 3* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures
F1 (C6 to C10) 25 <25 <25 <25 <25
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 750 25 <25 <25 <25 <25
F2 (C10 to C16) 150 100 <100 <100 <100 <100
F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene 150 100 <100 <100 <100 <100
F3 (C16 to C34) 500 100 <100 <100 <100 <100
F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs 500 100 <100 <100 <100 <100
F4 (C34 to C50) 500 100 <100 <100 <100 <100
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 500 500 NA NA NA NA
Terphenyl 117 124 133 130
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 3 Generic Site Condition Standards
in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 1 of 2
TABLE 4-16RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AND PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN GROUNDWATER
MOE Standards
Table 3* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
(15/04/2011) Texture
F1 (C6 to C10) 25
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 750 25
F2 (C10 to C16) 150 100
F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene 150 100
F3 (C16 to C34) 500 100
F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs 500 100
F4 (C34 to C50) 500 100
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 500 500
Terphenyl
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 3 Generic Site Condition Standards
in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
MW12-P
8/1/2012
All Textures
<25
<25
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
NA
91
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 2 of 2
TABLE 4-17RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR PAHs IN GROUNDWATER
MOE Standards MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-14 MW12-16
Table 3* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures
Naphthalene 1400 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Acenaphthylene 1.8 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Acenaphthene 600 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Fluorene 400 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Phenanthrene 580 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Anthracene 2.4 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Fluoranthene 130 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Pyrene 68 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Benz(a)anthracene 4.7 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Chrysene 1 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.75 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.4 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.81 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.2 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.52 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.2 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1800 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Chrysene-d12 50 -140 (% Acceptable Limits) 86 89 86 77
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 3 Generic Site Condition Standards
in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 1 of 2
TABLE 4-17RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR PAHs IN GROUNDWATER
MOE Standards
Table 3* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
(15/04/2011) Texture
Naphthalene 1400 0.20
Acenaphthylene 1.8 0.20
Acenaphthene 600 0.20
Fluorene 400 0.20
Phenanthrene 580 0.10
Anthracene 2.4 0.10
Fluoranthene 130 0.20
Pyrene 68 0.20
Benz(a)anthracene 4.7 0.20
Chrysene 1 0.10
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.75 0.10
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.4 0.10
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.81 0.01
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.2 0.20
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.52 0.20
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.2 0.20
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1800 0.20
Chrysene-d12 50 -140 (% Acceptable Limits)
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 3 Generic Site Condition Standards
in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
MW12-P
8/1/2012
All Textures
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.10
<0.10
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.01
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
90
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 2 of 2
TABLE 4-18RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs) IN GROUNDWATER
MOE Standards
MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-14 MW12-16 MW12-P
Table 3* RDL
Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012
(15/04/2011) Texture All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures
Dichlorodifluoromethane 4400 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Vinyl Chloride 0.5 0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17
Bromomethane 5.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Trichlorofluoromethane 2500 0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40
Acetone 130000 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1,1-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30
Methylene Chloride 610 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Methyl tert-butyl ether 190 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
1,1-Dichloroethane 320 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30
Methyl Ethyl Ketone 470000 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Chloroform 2.4 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
1,2-Dichloroethane 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 640 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.79 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Benzene 44 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
1,2-Dichloropropane 16 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Trichloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Bromodichloromethane 85000 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 140000 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.7 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Toluene 18000 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Dibromochloromethane 82000 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Ethylene Dibromide 0.25 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Tetrachloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.3 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Chlorobenzene 630 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Ethylbenzene 2300 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
m & p-Xylene 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Bromoform 380 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Styrene 1300 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.2 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
o-Xylene 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 9600 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4600 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
1,3-Dichloropropene 5.2 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30
Xylene Mixture 4200 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
n-Hexane 51 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20
Toluene-d8 105 102 97 99 100
4-Bromofluorobenzene 90 90 94 90 92
Note:
All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated
Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 3 Generic Site Condition Standards
in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
RDL Reported Detection Limit
< Not detected
Parameters
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 1 of 1
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 4-6
DCS
A trip blank comprising deionized water was prepared by the contracted laboratory to
accompany groundwater sample containers to determine whether contamination of the containers
or of the samples had occurred during shipment to the field or, following recovery, during
storage and shipment from the field to the laboratory. The trip blank was enclosed with sample
sets recovered for analysis for the presence of volatile organic compounds in groundwater.
The QA/QC test results were included on the laboratory analytical certificates included in
Appendix C. The results of the blind duplicate sample results and trip blank results were also
included on the summary chemical tables.
4.4 QA/QC RESULTS
The results of the QA/QC samples were reviewed to assess the representativeness
(reproducibility) of the laboratory data. This is often reported as relative percent difference
(RPD) according to the following equation:
100
X
XXRPD 21
Where:
X1 = concentration of original sample.
X2 = concentration of duplicate sample.
X = mean concentration of original and duplicate sample.
Eleven blind field duplicates of soil and eight blind field duplicates of groundwater were
submitted as part of the shipment of samples to the laboratory. The results of the analyses of the
blind field duplicate samples are included in the laboratory certificates in Appendix C. The
relative percent difference (RPD) was calculated for the duplicates and the original soil samples
and groundwater samples, respectively, using the formula above. RPD could not be calculated
for various chemical parameters where no measureable concentrations were reported in either the
original or duplicate sample or where the measured concentrations in either the original or
duplicate sample were less than five times the Reportable Detection Limit (RDL).
The calculated RPD for the soil samples and their field duplicates were all reported within 30%
except for the following two instances:
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 4-7
DCS
C 38.48% for sodium absorption ratio (SAR) in sample MW12-2 (SS2, 10.37m-
10.98m); and
C 113.48% for electrical conductivity (EC) in sample SS1-12 (1.22m-1.83m).
It is noted that each of these compounds reported both the respective duplicate and original
samples were below the applicable MOE standard, thus the variability does not affect the
interpretation of the results.
The calculated RPD for the groundwater samples and their field duplicates were all reported
within 30% except for the following four instances:
C 34.92% for vanadium in sample MW12-4;
C 51.47% for zinc in sample MW12-4;
C 103.12% for sodium in sample MW12-16; and
C 127.53% for chloride in sample MW12-16.
It is noted that SAR and EC in both the respective duplicate and original samples were reported
below the applicable MOE SCS, thus the variability does not affect the interpretation of the
results.
The surrogate recoveries reported on the laboratory certificates were also examined to ensure
that the percentage recoveries fell within the laboratory’s stated acceptable range.
It has been concluded, based on the foregoing, that the laboratory test results are acceptable and
were representative of the environmental quality of the soils and groundwater at the property for
the locations tested and on the sampling date.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 5-1
DCS
5.0 CONTAMINANT DISTRIBUTION
The distribution of the results of the laboratory analyses carried out on selected soil and
groundwater samples during the current investigation that met and exceeded the referenced
generic MOE SCS are described herein. Drawings 350550-3 and 350500-4 show the results of
the chemical analyses in soil and groundwater respectively that exceeded the applicable MOE
SCS.
5.1 SHORELINE
5.1.1 Soil
The reported results of the shoreline soil sampling (summarized in Tables 4-1 to 4-5) identified a
number of instances environmental impacts, largely represented by concentrations of metals in
excess of the MOE Table 9 SCS. The majority of these reported instances occurred in borehole
locations MW12-1 and MW12-2, located at the western end of the investigation area where the
residual ash treatment waste was deposited in a large ridge. At these two locations (MW12-1
and MW12-2 on Drawing 350500-3), reported concentrations of a number of metals (antimony,
barium, cadmium, chromium, copper, molybdenum, silver, uranium, zinc and mercury) along
with electrical conductivity (EC) exceeded the applicable MOE Table 9 SCS. These results were
reported in the ash fill zone that extended to a depth of approximately 6.5 m at MW12-1 and
10 m at MW12-2 and the uppermost sand and gravel fill layer underlying the ash at MW12-1.
Silt till was identified immediately underlying the ash fill zone at MW12-2 at a depth of
approximately 10 m. Hot water soluble boron was reported in the uppermost silt till underlying
the ash at MW12-2 in a concentration (2.6 ug/g averaged between the original sample and blind
field duplicate sample) that exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS of 1.5 ug/g.
At MW12-3, located at the eastern extent of the ridge created from the burial of the ash, a SAR
value of 7.14 reported from the bottom extent of the ash layer (7.93 to 8.54 m) exceeded the
MOE Table 9 SCS of 5. A second sample collected from the ash layer (5.49 to 6.10 m) did not
report any elevated concentrations of analytes. The ash layer was determined to extend for a
thickness of approximately 7 m at MW12-3.
Reported concentrations of PHCs, PAHs, VOCs and PCBs from samples collected and tested
from these three borehole locations (MW12-1 to MW12-3) located atop the ridge reported no
concentrations that exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 5-2
DCS
East of the ash burial area along the shoreline, (boreholes MW12-4 to MW12-10), relatively
minor issues were reported as summarized below:
copper marginally exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS (92 ug/g) in the surface
sample collected at MW12-6 (94 ug/g);
boron (hot water soluble) was reported at MW12-7 (0.6 to 1.2 m) in a
concentration of 3.74 ug/g that exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS of 1.5 ug/g;
EC measurements exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS at MW12-5 (1.2 to 1.8 m) and
MW12-7 (0.6 to 1.2 m and 3.6 to 4.1 m);
SAR exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS at MW12-9 (0.6 to 1.2 m);
PHCs (F2 and F3 fractions) were reported in the fill at MW12-4 in the sample
intervals of 1.2 to 1.8 m and 2.4 to 3 m in concentrations that exceeded the MOE
Table 9 SCS. This was the only instance where PHCs were reported in excess of
the MOE Table 9 SCS in the LWC Project Study Area. The sand and gravel fill
at this location, extending to a depth of approximately 4.3 m, was characterized
by a faint petroleum hydrocarbon odour and the presence of some asphalt
fragments. The results reported from the uppermost native soil underlying the fill
at this location that did not exhibit any odours or contain foreign debris (asphalt)
and reported no analytical results that exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS; and
a reported concentration of fluoranthene (PAH) of 0.83 ug/g exceeded the MOE
Table 9 SCS of 0.69 ug/g at MW12-8 from 0.61 to 1.22 mbgs. This was the only
instance where PAHs were reported in excess of the MOE Table 9 SCS in the
LWC Project Study Area.
A distilled water leach test was carried out on two composite samples collected from MW12-1
and MW12-2 for inorganic compounds, PHCs, PAHs and VOCs. The results of the leachate test
results are shown on Table 4-6. The majority of the results reported no detectable or very low
concentrations of these parameters. The notable exception was the presence of PHCs (F2 to F4
fractions) reported in the composite sample collected from MW12-1. This sample, comprising
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 5-3
DCS
the sampling interval 9.76 to 10.37 m that exhibited a moderate hydrocarbon odour, reported the
following results in leachate:
F2 – 3,000 ug/L;
F3 – 6,400 ug/L; and
F4 – 1,200 ug/L.
In MW12-2, a concentration of 850 ug/L F3 PHCs was reported only.
There are no applicable guidelines or standard against which to compare the distilled water leach
test results. The distilled water leachate test carried out at MW12-1 included only the relatively
narrow fill layer that exhibited the petroleum hydrocarbon odours that reflects a very small
percentage of the total soil column in this apart of the investigation area and thus are biased in
this regard.
5.1.2 Groundwater
No reported concentrations of analytes exceeded the applicable MOE Table 9 SCS except for
one reported instance of F3 fraction PHCs (530 ug/L) reported in a groundwater sample collected
from MW12-1 that exceeded the Table 9 SCS of 500 ug/L (refer to Tables 4-7 to 4-10).
5.2 PROPOSED SERSON CREEK RE-ALIGNMENT
5.2.1 Soil
Boreholes MW12-11 to MW12-16 were drilled along a potential re-alignment route of Serson
Creek. The results of the testing on soils (summarized in Tables 4-11 to 4-14) reported no
concentrations of substances that exceeded the MOE Table 3 SCS except for one instance at
MW12-14 where cadmium (2.9 ug/g) in the sample interval 0.6 to 1.2 m exceeded the Table 3
SCS of 1.5 ug/g.
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 5-4
DCS
5.2.2 Groundwater
No reported concentrations of analytes exceeded the applicable MOE Table 3 SCS (refer to
Tables 4-15 to 4-18).
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 6-1
DCS
6.0 DISCUSSION
A discussion of the findings of the DCS investigation is presented below. The key objective of
the work was to characterize the near shore soil and groundwater environmental conditions to
identify any resulting potential environmental liabilities in regards to the land creation and
naturalization. In addition, a series of boreholes and groundwater monitoring wells were
installed along the proposed Serson Creek realignment route to assess soil and groundwater
conditions in relation to the realignment of the Serson Creek flow channel.
6.1 SHORELINE
The results of the testing of fill and native soil along the shoreline near the proposed LWC
Project Study Area identified a number of instances where the soils did not meet the applicable
MOE SCS. These results, shown in Drawing 350500-3, were largely represented by metals
along with EC and SAR reported in fill. Very localized concentrations of PHCs (in MW12-4
associated with fill that exhibited petroleum hydrocarbon odours) and PAHs (MW12-8) were
also reported. The source of these soil impacts is attributed to the environmental condition of the
fill used for land creation to accommodate the past expansion to the WWTF. It is understood
that land creation and naturalization will not involve the disturbance of any of the existing land
mass beyond the possible removal of armour stones where it is installed along portions of the
existing shoreline.
The primary concern with regards to the development of new terrestrial and wetland habitat is
the potential for the migration of contaminated groundwater discharging into these areas,
whether the source of the groundwater contamination is from the near shore soil conditions or
form some other farther upstream source. In this regard, testing of groundwater from the wells
installed along the shoreline did not report any concentrations of analytes that exceeded the
applicable generic MOE SCS for groundwater within 30 m of an open water body (Table 9 SCS)
except for one instance of F3 PHCs reported in MW12-1 located at the western end of the LWC
Project Study Area (530 ug/L versus 500 ug/L). These results indicate that the soil
contamination (identified as those compounds that exceed the applicable MOE SCS) has not
impacted groundwater quality in any significant manner.
The MOE SCS for F3 PHCs ion groundwater is not an ecological-derived or human health –
derived risk-based value. The MOE SCS has been established based upon the relatively low
solubility of F3 PHC s in groundwater and thus the potential for the formation of NAPL. It
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 6-2
DCS
should be noted that no evidence of a NAPL was identified within the LWC Project Study Area
and thus, the result reported in MW12-1 is not considered to be a significant concern warranting
further remedial or mitigative action. An on-going periodic groundwater sampling program
could be developed to monitor groundwater conditions going forward to ensure that there are no
future concerns to the land creation and naturalization.
As discussed below, there was no reported concentrations of any analytes in groundwater
reported further upgradient within the monitoring wells installed along the proposed Serson
Creek realignment route.
6.2 PROPOSED SERSON CREEK REALIGNMENT
Fill was encountered in thicknesses ranging from 0.61 to 2.44 mbgs. Fill thicknesses was most
evident in the western-most boreholes (MW12-11 to MW12-13) that were situated on top of a
reported former rail spur (MW12-11 and MW12-12) within a low-lying area into which Serson
Creek currently discharges and where base flow is channelled through a buried pipe to Lake
Ontario under the WWTF. Borehole MW12-13 is located east of the low lying drainage area.
Based on the field standard penetration test results, the relative density of the soils were typically
compact to very dense.
No reported concentrations of inorganic parameters, PHCs, PAHs or VOCs were reported in
soils analyzed from boreholes MW12-11 to MW12-16 except for a reported concentration of
cadmium reported in fill at MW12-14 (refer to Drawing 350500-3). The extent of this one
instance has not been delineated and, in of itself, is not a significant issue in the absence of
confirmation sampling. Should serious consideration be given to the future realignment of
Serson Creek, then we would recommend that additional sampling be carried out in the vicinity
of the reported cadmium concentration in fill soil to confirm the significance and extent of this
soil condition.
Groundwater was measured at depths of 4.99 to 7.23 mbgs. Groundwater testing, including at
MW12-14, did not report any concerns with all analysis meeting the applicable MOE SCS.
7.0 CLOSURE
The field program for this investigation was undertaken by Mr. Ilir Liko, M.E.Sc., P,Geo,working under the supervision of Mr. Michael Weber, P.Geo, QP. The report was prepared byIvir. Michael Weber, P.Geo., QP. Mr. Weber is a Qualified Persons in accordance withO.Reg. 153/04.
Yours very truly,
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Michael B. Weber, P.Geo., QP Ilir Liko, M.E.Sc., P.Geo.Senior Project Manager Environmental Geoscientist
Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLWC E4350500-005— September 2013 7-1
Dcs
Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 8-1
DCS
8.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS
This report, prepared for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, does not provide
certification or warranty, expressed or implied, that the investigation conducted by DCS
uncovered all potential contaminants of environmental concern at the site. The work undertaken
by DCS was directed to provide information on potential contamination that might have accrued
from its historic use. Based on the results of the investigation, DCS found some evidence of
chemical parameters in concentrations exceeding the evaluation criteria selected for the site. The
test data, chemical analyses and conclusions given in the reports, however, are the results of a
sampling of the subsoils and groundwater encountered during the program and, based upon the
total number of boreholes and monitoring wells performed, are considered to fairly represent the
subsurface conditions within each area tested. It should be noted, however, that any assessment
regarding the presence of contamination at the site is based on interpretation of conditions
determined at specific locations and depths. This assessment cannot warrant that other isolated
pockets of impacted soils are not located on the site. Chemical parameters were chosen based on
potential contamination sources and, therefore, results are limited to those parameters tested.
Further, the report was prepared by DCS for the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
The material in it reflects DCS’ best judgement in light of the information available at the time
of preparation, September 2013. Changes to soil and/or groundwater quality in the areas
investigated can occur following the date of testing. Any use which a third party makes of the
report, or reliance on, or decisions to be based on it, is the responsibility of such third parties.
DCS
APPENDIX A
STANDARD PROCEDURES
350500 – September 2013 Appendix A – Page 1 of 7
DCS
APPENDIX A
STANDARD PROCEDURES A.1 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES A.1.1 OVERBURDEN DRILLING AND SAMPLING Drilling and sampling operations are typically conducted with the use of a mobile power auger equipped to advance holes through overburden using hollow-stem and continuous flight augers; diamond drills using wash-boring techniques; rotary drills using mud or air reverse circulation. For shallow boreholes or sampling indoors Pionjar percussion drill sampling is frequently used. Soil samples are generally recovered on a continuous basis, with the use of a 51 mm diameter, 600 mm or 750 mm long, split-spoon sampler, over the full depth of the boreholes. In addition, direct push drills have become regularly used for holes of shallow depth. When utilizing the direct push method with a dual tube sampling system, soil samples are retrieved on a continuous basis in 1.2 m lengths in individual, disposable sampling tubes. No lubricants are used in the make-up of the augers, drill rods or samplers, and appropriate sampling and drilling control procedures are adopted to avoid cross-contamination between the samples and sampling locations. The split spoon sampling is carried out in conjunction with the Standard Penetration Test used to provide ‘N’ values for the determination of relative density in cohesionless soils and consistency in cohesive soils. This information is not collected when utilizing direct push drilling techniques or when utilizing a Pionjar drill. Individual soil samples are examined upon recovery by the field engineer or technician for purposes of describing and recording texture, colour, odour and moisture content. Borehole logs are prepared on the basis of sample and drilling process observations in the field describing the encountered strata and visual or olfactory evidence of subsurface contamination, if present. Following field logging, samples are placed into labelled, sterile, 500 mR wide-mouth glass jars with polymer interleaf -lined lids for shipment to the DCS laboratory for detailed inspection. Glass 50 mR septum jars, with Teflon-lined caps, are used to collect soil subsamples for volatile organic analysis. The septum jars are required to be completely filled with soil to ensure that no headspace is available to accommodate desorbed organics. Once the soil samples have been recovered and placed into the sterile glass jars, the samples are temporarily stored in cardboard containers, in the field vehicle awaiting shipment to the DCS office for examination. Following selection in the office laboratory, the samples are forwarded to a commercial environmental testing laboratory for analysis. Where high levels of contamination are anticipated or where evidence of high levels of contamination (strong odours, staining, evident presence of wastes or dangerous materials) are noted during drilling, drill cuttings from the boreholes are placed in 16 gauge steel, ring-topped, 205 R drums for storage and off-site disposal. Where no evidence of untoward level of contamination is
350500 – September 2013 Appendix A – Page 2 of 7
DCS
present, cuttings are used to backfill the boring and are tamped into place prior to reinstatement of any surface covering, such as asphalt or concrete pavements or slabs. Where excess cuttings are generated (i.e., because of monitoring well installations, etc.), surplus clean soil is spread on unpaved ground surfaces in the vicinity of the borehole or placed in clean ring-topped 205 R steel drums and removed for off-site disposal. A.1.2 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION Prior to the start of the drilling program, all augers and centre plugs are cleaned at the shop by the drilling contractor. The lead augers and centre plugs are hand-cleaned between boreholes to remove any residual soil or debris adhering to the down-hole tools, well away from the location of any boreholes, to avoid the possibility of cross-contamination. All sampling tools used (split-spoons, putty knives, trowels, etc.) are thoroughly cleaned following the recovery of each sample. The samplers are first wiped clean of free soil or any other materials adhering to inner and outer surfaces, and then washed with a wire brush in a solution of water and laboratory-grade phosphate-free detergent (Sparkleen). Detergent residues are removed by rinsing with municipally-treated clean tap water. In the event that persistent organic contaminants or stains adhere to the surface of the sampler, it is sprayed with hexane, a highly volatile solvent followed by a spray of methanol. The final stage of the sampler tool decontamination process comprises a spray with distilled water to eliminate any surficial residues. A.1.3 SOIL GAS VAPOUR MONITORING Headspace measurements are taken in the field a set period after recovery of the soil samples with the use of either a photoionization detector (HNu) or explosimeter (GasTech 1238ME) to identify the presence of ionizable volatile organic vapours in the soil. The readings obtained using either meter are obtained by gently inserting the tip of the meter probe through the polymer interleaf cover placed over the mouth of each 500 mR sample jar and aspirating a vapour aliquot for testing. The 50 mR teflon-lined septum jars which contain a split sample of the soil within the 500 mR jar for volatile organic analyses are not disturbed. Where samples are to be recovered for headspace testing purposes only, the soil sample is placed in a “Ziploc” LDPE bag and allowed to come to room temperature for a period of two hours before testing. The tip of the meter probe is used to puncture the side of the bag to facilitate aspiration of the vapour sample. The HNu photoionization meter used to read soil gas vapour concentrations is calibrated to a hexane gas standard and all measurements are reported in parts per million by volume. The GasTech meter is equipped with two ranges of measurement, reading concentrations in the parts per million (0 to 500 ppm) range and as a percentage of the lower explosive limit (0 to 100% LEL) also calibrated to hexane. LEL is a measure of the propensity for an atmosphere to detonate or deflagrate with 100% LEL being the minimum concentration of gas, in air, required for ignition. The monitoring results are noted on the borehole logs for subsequent evaluation purposes. The headspace vapour profile for each borehole or test pit is assessed to identify likely zones of elevated organic contaminants in the soil column and to assist in the selection of samples stored within 50 mR
350500 – September 2013 Appendix A – Page 3 of 7
DCS
septum jars for analytical purposes. Soil gas vapour monitoring results are shown on the logs generated for each borehole. An additional feature of the GasTech monitor allows its use to measure soil gas with or without methane gas elimination. This allows for soil gas measurements to be taken without the influence of methane gas on the readings which may be present in the soil, however, not contributing to the vapour contaminant of concern. A.1.4 BOREHOLE SURVEYS Borehole and test pit locations are laid out in the field by a two-person field crew, using a chain, stadia measurement or total station instrument, with reference to existing buildings and other permanent structures and features identified on the site plan. Ground surface elevations at borehole and monitoring well collars are established in the field using an automatic level survey instrument. A closed level loop is carried out to complete the survey. Ground surface elevations are referenced to the elevation of a municipal, geodetic or hydrographic survey benchmark, unless a local datum referenced to a known or assumed elevation is to be used for the survey. Details of the location of the benchmark or local datum used are presented in the report. A.2 GROUNDWATER MONITORING A.2.1 WELL INSTALLATION Monitoring wells are typically completed using 37.5 or 55 mm diameter Schedule 40 PVC Triloc riser pipes with a 1.5 or 3 m long No. 10 slot intake zone (screen). No glues or solvents are used in the construction of the wells to avoid introducing volatiles into the well and, thereby, biasing the analytical results. Silica sand is placed around and to a height of at least 300 mm above the top of the well screen as a gravel pack. The remaining annular is sealed with Holeplug, Benseal or other bentonite seal. A protective steel casing or a ground-level, flush-mounted, steel casing is then grouted in place at the top of the well to protect the installation from damage or vandalism. All elevated casings are locked with 2402 keyed mortice locks. Flush-mounted casing protectors are generally bolted in place. Where wells are to penetrate through low permeability confining strata separating an upper and lower aquifer, a lower seal is set in the confining layer to ensure against the transmission and possible migration of contaminants between aquifers. In accordance with O.Reg. 903 there is a requirement for a well record to be submitted to the MOE for each monitoring well or group of monitoring wells installed. The well tag and well record is submitted by the subcontract licensed well driller who install the well. Also under this regulation the property owner is required to have unused or abandoned wells properly decommissioned by a licensed well driller prior to abandoning the well. The regulation provides details of well abandonment procedures and requires that a well abandonment record be filed with the MOE.
350500 – September 2013 Appendix A – Page 4 of 7
DCS
A.2.2 GROUNDWATER MEASUREMENT A dedicated WaTerra inertial pump is installed in each well to ensure that samples representative of subsurface water conditions at the location at which the screen is set are recovered without the threat of cross-contamination. Following completion of drilling, the depth from ground surface (borehole collar) to the phreatic surface is measured with the use of a Solinst SOL1 water level indicator or interface meter and recorded on the borehole log. The wells are developed by hand-pumping the WaTerra sampler to ensure that at least three and as many as ten well volumes of water (depending on recovery periods) are removed to reduce the potential effects of contamination introduced through drilling, and to maximize the responsiveness to the surrounding geological materials. Following development, the phreatic surface is allowed to reinstate itself prior to obtaining final groundwater elevations. Measurements of the water levels are made from all wells within the same time period to ensure that the results are representative of conditions across the entire site. Any unusual weather conditions and modifying features encountered are noted on the log. Field data are reduced with reference to collar elevations and are tabulated with the date of the measurements. A.2.3 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING Groundwater samples are recovered from the well through the inertial pump directly into sterile glass or plastic sample jars that have been pretreated with preservatives, where appropriate. Sample jars are obtained directly from the laboratory and are received, stored and, when filled, shipped back to the laboratory for analysis in a sealed insulated cooler box. For analyses of inorganic species, the sample is pumped from the well through a WaTerra Hydropore 0.45 Fm cartridge filter to eliminate suspended solids. Samples destined for organic analyses are obtained unfiltered. In both cases, the samples are retained in a marked sample jar to which a sample label identifying the well number, date of recovery and other pertinent information is affixed. The sample jars are filled to the brim to eliminate headspace air to reduce the possibility of oxidation and degassing. Sample bottles are then stored in the insulated cooler and either protected from freezing during winter weather or cooled with freezer packs to an optimum temperature of less than 8ºC during warm weather pending shipment to the laboratory. A.2.4 IN SITU RESPONSE TESTS Formation permeability is determined through application of a falling (slug) or rising head test carried out in the monitoring well. Where the screened section is fully contained below the phreatic surface, additional water can be added to the well riser to provide a head to force flow into the soil or rock formation. When the screen intersects the phreatic surface, resulting in exposure of open screen to unsaturated soil above the water table, the monitoring well is pumped down and then allowed to recharge from the surrounding soil. In both cases, the change in water level is measured at set time intervals with a water level indicator and recorded in the field. Where response time is too short to permit manual measurement with the Solinst indicator, a pressure transducer can be used to provide the rate of head change with time to be recorded. Well information recorded at the time of testing includes well radius (r), screened interval length (L), gravel pack radius (R), height of the phreatic surface above an arbitrary datum (H), the height of the water column in the well at the cessation of pumping or surcharging (Ho) and the height of the water column in the well at each measurement interval t (h).
350500 – September 2013 Appendix A – Page 5 of 7
DCS
A.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL The principal reason for the recovery of soil and groundwater samples in the field is to permit their inspection and analysis to determine whether contaminants or foreign matter is present at levels that constitute a health-, environmental- or construction-related liability, the discharge of which will require remedial or mitigative action. The accuracy with which the analytical results returned from chemical testing at the laboratory reflects the in-place condition is critical to the success of the site characterization program and thus every effort must be taken to ensure that the samples are recovered, handled, stored, shipped to and received at the laboratory in a condition that is representative of the material on site. A.3.1 SAMPLE PRESERVATION Preservation of soil samples quality is critical in the case of volatile organic compounds only, where the use of glass, Teflon-lined 50 mR septum jars, filled to the brim to avoid residual headspace into which volatiles can degas, as required. Volatiles samples are kept in a refrigerated condition at an ideal temperature of less than 4ºC and of no more than 10ºC and are delivered to the laboratory as soon after recovery as is practicable and in no case after more than 14 days from the date of recovery. Samples recovered for testing for the presence of inorganic contaminants have no time limit restriction between recovery and testing, if sealed. Where samples are tested for the presence of semi-volatile and non-volatile organics, they are analyzed within 60 days of recovery to ensure that biodegradation does not materially affect the chemical loading in the soil. All sample jars should be maintained in a sealed condition in the dark under refrigerated conditions. Preservation requirements for groundwater samples are dependent on the contaminant parameters for which the analyses are being conducted. MOE requirements are widely adopted by the industry in Ontario and listed in the MOE document entitled Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act dated March 2004 (amended as of 1 July 2011). The sample preservation procedures and holding time limits applied and the container types used are consistent with the requirements of the guidance document. A.3.2 SAMPLE SEALS On samples collected for volatile organic analyses, adhesive sample seals are affixed across the lids of all sample jar and bottle containers or sample shipment container lid in such a way as to ensure that the seal must be broken on opening. Seals are placed to provide evidence of tampering with samples while in transit or temporary storage between the time of recovery and delivery to the laboratory. A.3.3 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Full chain-of-custody procedures are applied from the point at which field staff surrenders responsibility for the samples in the field or, where that individual is responsible for transit from the field location to the office, at their place of work. Chain-of-custody forms, which log the date of transfer and identity of the parties by and to whom the transfer has been made, also record the identity of the samples included in the shipment, the date sampled and sample location, the analyses
350500 – September 2013 Appendix A – Page 6 of 7
DCS
requested for each sample, the name and address of the laboratory to which the samples are assigned, and any clarifying notes that may be required. A.3.4 SAMPLE QUALITY MANAGEMENT Laboratory or field control checks are utilized to ensure that the quality of the analytical data is maintained at an acceptable level. All laboratories to which samples are sent for chemical analysis are CALA-certified and participate in applicable inter-laboratory testing rounds administered by provincial and federal agencies. Field duplicate samples, where used, are prepared by obtaining a soil or groundwater sample split from preselected sample locations. The splits are provided with fictitious sample identification designations and submitted to the laboratory for analysis to permit a determination of the internal quality control and repeatability of analyses from the selected laboratory to be determined. Trip blanks comprising deionized water may be prepared by the contracted laboratory to accompany groundwater sample containers to determine whether contamination of the containers or of the samples had occurred during shipment to the field or, following recovery, during storage and shipment from the field to the laboratory. Trip blanks are generally enclosed with sample sets recovered for analysis for the presence of volatile organic compounds. As described under the Laboratory Analysis section, matrix spikes are conducted a minimum of once during each project run by the laboratory. Field duplicate matrix spikes are normally not prepared. Laboratory duplicates are run in the laboratory on ten percent of the samples subject to testing. Laboratory analysis results and QA/QC program results are carefully scrutinized on receipt to determine whether the results returned are representative. The laboratory customer services representative is contacted for clarification, if any uncertainty associated with the veracity or quality of the results is noted.
350500 – September 2013 Appendix A – Page 7 of 7
DCS
A.4 LABORATORY ANALYSIS The procedures detailed in the MOE Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in Assessment of Properties Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, dated 9 March 2004 (amended as of 1 July 2011), constitutes the accepted standards for chemical testing for environmental evaluation purposes in the province (where available). In accordance with this protocol, all appropriate laboratory quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures, including the use of spikes, replicates and blanks, are incorporated and run a minimum of once per sample set. The QA/QC data are returned with the laboratory reports received.
DCS
APPENDIX B
BOREHOLE LOGS
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown
- trace silt, trace ash @ 0.61-1.22m
ASH - red, powdery texture, damp to moist
- intermixed silty sand and gravel @ 2.70m
- some silty sand and gravel @ 6.10m
SILTY SAND and GRAVEL - grey, moist, traceof ash
- seam of ash @ 6.71m
- plastic bag @ 7.32-7.93m
82.321.22
76.996.55
80
80
80
90
80
80
80
80
90
90
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NN
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
SS-9
SS-10
SS-11A
SS-11BSS-12
SS-13
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
Metals & Inorganics
7141615
7788
55711
6554
3222
2222
1122
1111
1121
2125
2235
77710
6
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA29/06/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
Continued
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-1
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 2
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 83.54m 20 40 60 80
- becomes wet @ 7.93m
- SILT - brown to grey/black, wet, some sand.
- hydrocarbon odour @ 9.76-10.21m, solvent odour@ 10.21 - 10.36 m.
- wet to saturated @ 9.76-10.22m.
SILT TILL (Native) - brown to greyish brown,some sand, no odour.
END of BOREHOLE @ 10.98m
Groundwater elevation @ 75.46m asl. on 2 August2012
75.008.54
73.1810.36
72.5610.98
N
NN
N
Y
YN
SS-14A
SS-14BSS-15
SS-16
SS-17A
SS-17BSS-18
and PAHsanalyses
PAHs, PHCs andVOCs analyses
VOCs and PHCsanalyses
Groundwateranalysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs
910122132
2122
2122
4446
7466
Supervised by:
8
9
10
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA29/06/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-1
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 2 of 2
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
20 40 60 80
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - trace silt
ASH - red, powdery texture, damp to moist
- becomes moist @ 6.10m
- becomes wet @ 6.71m
- trace wood fragments @ 7.32-7.93m
83.180.61
80
70
60
80
70
90
90
90
90
40
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
SS-9
SS-10
SS-11
SS-12
SS-13
Metals & Inorganicsand PAHs analyses
Metals &Inorganics, VOCsand PHCs analyses
6989
5567
4544
22410
6567
3255
2322
1/600
4336
8987
4689
3556
4
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA28/06/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
Continued
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-2
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 2
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 83.79m 20 40 60 80
SILT TILL (Native) - brown to grey, wet.
WEATHERED SHALE BEDROCK - dark grey
END of BOREHOLE @ 13.11m
Groundwater elevation @ 76.16m asl. on 2 August2012
73.889.91
70.9812.8170.6813.11
20
80
60
80
60
30
50
60
70
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
SS-14
SS-15
SS-16
SS-17
SS-18
SS-19
SS-20
SS-21
SS-22
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
Groundwateranalysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs
4344224
3222
1111
1155
8534
2235
4345
447
27/15
Supervised by:
8
9
10
11
12
13
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA28/06/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-2
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 2 of 2
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
20 40 60 80
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA28/06/2012
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 2
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 83.84m 20 40 60 80Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
Continued
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-3
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, trace to somesilt.
ASH - red, powdery texture, damp to moist
- becomes moist @ 4.88m
- becomes dark brown, moist to saturated @ 5.79m
- becomes wet to saturated @ 6.10m
SILT - grey, trace sand, trace gravel
83.230.61
76.986.86
90
90
90
80
80
80
90
70
100
90
90
80100
90
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NN
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
SS-9
SS-10
SS-11
SS-12ASS-12B
SS-13
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
PHCs and VOCsanalyses
4868
6677
3233
1111
1122
1112
1111
1/600
2455
3544
2212
11142024
9
Supervised by:
- becomes brown, trace asphalt fragments @ 7.93m
SILT TILL (Native) - grey, damp.
- 0.05m seam of sand and gravel @ 8.84m
END of BOREHOLE @ 9.15m
Well dry on 2 August 2012
75.318.53
74.699.15
70
60
N
N
SS-14
SS-15
Metals & Inorganicsand PAHs analyses
1313144171411
5456
8
9
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA28/06/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-3
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 2 of 2
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
20 40 60 80
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown and grey,some silt, trace to some asphalt
- becomes brown to grey/black, with moderatehydrocarbon odour @ 0.61 - 4.27m
- becomes moist to wet sand, some gravel @ 1.22m
SILTY SAND (Native) - brown to grey, wet, tracegravel, some clay, no odour
SANDY SILT - brown, wet, some clay
SHALE BEDROCK - dark grey
END of BOREHOLE @ 6.40m
Groundwater elevation @ 74.07m asl. on 2 August2012
72.844.27
72.234.88
71.175.94
70.716.40
90
90
90
80
80
80
90
70
100
90
90
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
SS-9
SS-10A
SS-10BSS-11
Metals & Inorganicsand PAHs analyses
VOCs, PHCs andPCBs analyses
PHCs and PCBsanalyses
Metals & Inorganicsand PAHs analyses
PHCs analyses
Groundwateranalysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs
8111520
14252221
11161210
610128
3335
1112
1112
1223
2223
120
50/130
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA27/06/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-4
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 1
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 77.11m 20 40 60 80
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, dry, trace silt
- becomes moist @ 1.22m
SILTY SAND to SANDY SILT - brown, moist,some clay, trace gravel
- becomes wet @ 1.83m
SANDY SILT (Native) - brown, moist, tracegravel
- becomes brown and grey, with trace to some clay@ 3.66m
END of BOREHOLE @ 4.27m
Groundwater elevation @ 74.53m als. on 2 August2012
75.121.68
74.362.44
72.534.27
80
75
70
10040
30
30
80
N
N
N
NN
N
N
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3A
SS-3BSS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
Metals & Inorganicsand PAHs analyses
Metals &Inorganics, VOCsand PHCs analyses
Groundwateranalysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs
2347
10161011
3322
0000
1111
1212
1112
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA27/06/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-5
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 1
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 76.80m 20 40 60 80
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown
SANDY SILT - brown, damp, trace to some sand,trace gravel
- becomes moist, with trace clay below 1.83m
- becomes more sandy, brown to grey @ 2.44m
- no recovery from 3.05 - 3.66m
SANDY SILT (Native) - dark grey
END of BOREHOLE @ 4.27m
Groundwater elevation @ 74.50m asl. on 1 August2012
76.870.46
73.673.66
73.064.27
80
10080
80
80
50
0
N
NN
N
N
N
N
N
SS-1A
SS-1BSS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
Metals &Inorganics, PAHsand PCBs analyses
VOCs and PHCsanalyses
VOCs and PHCsanalyses
Groundwateranalysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs
6142014
117714
47712
46812
5754
3233
1124
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA26/06/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-6
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 1
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 77.33m 20 40 60 80
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - grey, some silt
- becomes saturated @ 1.22m
- some silt & clay @ 1.83-3.66m
- becomes wet @ 3.66m
- becoming grey, silty @ 4.11mSILT TILL (Native) - grey, trace sand, trace gravel
END of BOREHOLE @ 4.88m
Groundwater elevation @ 74.05m asl. on 2 August2012
72.994.27
72.384.88
70
70
60
70
70
85
55
85
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
PAHs analyses
VOCs and PHCsanalyses
PAHs analyses
VOCs and PHCsanalyses
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
Groundwateranalysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs
6111314
191917
3355
1248
3355
362121
630
28/30
6431715
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA26/06/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-7
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 1
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 77.26m 20 40 60 80
PAHs analyses
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
VOCs and PHCsanalyses
Groundwateranalysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, trace silt,trace rootlets
SILTY SAND - grey, moist, trace gravel
SANDY SILT - grey, moist, trace gravel
SILTY SAND (Native) - brown, wet, trace gravel
SAND - brown to grey, wet, trace gravel
END of BOREHOLE @ 4.88m
Groundwater elevation @ 73.82m asl. on 1 August2012
75.481.73
74.772.44
73.553.66
73.104.11
72.334.88
90
70
85
50
65
65
80
100
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
PAHs analyses
Metals & Inorganicsand PCBs analyses
VOCs and PHCsanalyses
3579
9101111
3566
1222
1122
11052
13517
27353133
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA25/06/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-8
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 1
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 77.21m 20 40 60 80
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, damp, tracerootlets
- trace limestone @ 0.61m
- becomes moist to wet @ 1.22m
- becomes moist to wet, with trace silt and trace clay@ 1.83m
- brown to black @ 2.29m
- becomes brown, with trace limestone @ 2.59m
SAND - brown, moist to wet, with trace gravel,piece of geotextile
SAND and GRAVEL (Native) - brown to darkgrey, moist to wet
- becomes brown to black @ 4.57m
- becomes dark grey @ 5.33m
END of BOREHOLE @ 6.71m
Groundwater elevation @ 73.81m asl. on 1 August2012
74.393.05
73.633.81
70.736.71
90
80
80
50
70
85
90
90
95
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
SS-9
Metals & Inorganicsand PCBs analyses
Metals & Inorganicsand PHCs analyses
PAHs analyses
VOCs and PHCsanalyses
Groundwateranalysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs
46610
12887
00107
450/80
15131414
3555
2476
6887
7986
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA25/06/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-9
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 1
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 77.44m 20 40 60 80
SAND and GRAVEL (Native) - brown, damp,trace rootlets
- becomes moist @ 0.61m
SAND - dark grey, trace gravel
- becomes grey to brown, wet @ 1.83m
- some gravel @ 2.29-3.05m
END of BOREHOLE @ 3.05m
Groundwater elevation @ 73.92m asl. on 2 August2012
74.061.22
72.233.05
60
90
50
0
N
N
N
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
Metals & Inorganicsand PAHs analyses
VOCs and PHCsanalyses
Groundwateranalysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs
210107
9121310
3656
7533
Supervised by:
1
2
3
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA26/06/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-10
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 1
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 75.28m 20 40 60 80
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, dry to damp
- becomes brown to grey @ 0.61m
- crushed stones @ 0.91-1.52m
SANDY SILT TILL (Native) - brown, moist
- trace gravel from 2.44-3.66m
SAND - brown, moist, trace silt, trace gravel
- becomes wet @ 4.27m
- fine grained @ 4.88-5.49m
SAND and GRAVEL - grey, moist
SAND - grey, wet
81.151.52
79.013.66
77.185.49
75.966.71
70
80
70
70
100
80
80
80
90
90
100
90
70
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3A
SS-3B
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
SS-9
SS-10
SS-11
SS-12
SS-13
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
7172019
6132820
161265561013
691720
5162124
9233030
9162832
142869
7555/80
30755565
12252032
4
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA06/07/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
Continued
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-11
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 2
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 82.67m 20 40 60 80
END of BOREHOLE @ 7.93m
Groundwater elevation @ 76.28m asl. on 1 August2012
74.747.93 Groundwater
analysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs
142428
Supervised by:
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA06/07/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-11
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 2 of 2
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
20 40 60 80
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, trace silt, dryto damp
- becomes brown to grey @ 0.61m
SANDY SILT TILL (Native) - brown, moist, tracesand
SAND and GRAVEL - brown and grey, moist,some silt, some angular rock fragments
80.381.83
78.553.66
70
50
90
70
100
100
70
60
50
50
50
90
90
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
SS-9
SS-10
SS-11
SS-12
SS-13A
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
69108
54926
27261911
24710
5101520
5111820
1728
26/15
2962
60/100
6361
60/100
2353
70/100
160/150
20496875
16
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA04/07/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
Continued
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-12
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 2
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 82.21m 20 40 60 80
SAND - brown and grey, wet
END of BOREHOLE @ 9.15m
Groundwater elevation @ 74.98m asl. on 1 August2012
74.597.62
73.069.15
100
100
100
N
N
N
SS-13B
SS-14
SS-15
Groundwateranalysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs
30282516302825
13152425
Supervised by:
8
9
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA04/07/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-12
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 2 of 2
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
20 40 60 80
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown
SILTY SAND - grey, moist, some gravel
- trace gravel @ 1.22-2.44m
- becoming sandy silt, brown @ 1.83m
SANDY SILT TILL (Native) - brown, moist, tracegravel
SAND and GRAVEL - brown
- becomes brown to grey, with trace silt @ 5.49m
- becomes wet @ 6.71m
END of BOREHOLE @ 7.32m
82.930.61
81.102.44
78.664.88
76.227.32
70
80
40
80
80
95
95
100
50
80
60
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
SS-9
SS-10
SS-11
SS-12
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
71086
2236
2422
1221
2349
261211
8162326
5112050
6050/50
2574
60/150
3570
50/80
42825257
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA04/07/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 BH12-13
n/a
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 1
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 83.54m 20 40 60 80
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, moist
SANDY SILT - grey and black, moist, tracegravel, septic odour from 0.61 to 1.22 m
SANDY SILT TILL (Native) - brown, moist, tracegravel
- some sand @ 2.90-3.00m- some gravel @ 3.05-4.27m
SAND - brown, some silt, trace gravel, moist
- no recovery @ 4.88-6.10m
- becomes wet @ 6.10m
82.740.61
81.521.83
79.084.27
70
60
40
60
95
100
80
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
SS-11
SS-12
SS-13
Metals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCsanalyses
Metals & Inorganicsand PHCs analyses
PHCs analyses
10151511
3346
2236
581220
8142228
5132025
8132127
5222742
40433035
12213037
13
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA03/07/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Driller:
Continued
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-14
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 2
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 83.35m 20 40 60 80
- some silt @ 7.75-7.88mEND of BOREHOLE @ 7.93m
Groundwater elevation @ 77.15m asl. on 1 August2012
75.427.93 Groundwater
analysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs
182534
Supervised by:
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA03/07/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-14
Installed
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 2 of 2
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
20 40 60 80
SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, some asphalt,trace of silt
- becoming silty sand to sandy silt, some of gravel@ 0.61-1.37m
SANDY SILT TILL (Native) - brown, moist, tracegravel
- becomes moist to wet @ 1.83m
SAND - brown, moist
- coarser-grained, some gravel below 3.66m
- becomes moist @ 4.57m
- becomes grey @ 5.79m
END of BOREHOLE @ 6.10m
80.681.37
79.003.05
75.956.10
80
90
95100
95
20
80
15
100
100
N
N
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3ASS-3B
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
SS-9
SS-10A
SS-10B
Metals & Inorganicsand PAHs analyses
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
111377
12131814
12131312
12133246
28253250
12233652
35
50/130
19242123
14182024
10182540
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA29/06/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 BH12-15
n/a
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 1
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 82.05m 20 40 60 80
RQ
D
Prepared by:
Checked by:
Date:
Monitoring Well:
100 200 300 400
Borehole:
Odo
ur
Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount
I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-16
Installed
SILTY SAND (Fill) - brown
SANDY SILT TILL (Native) - brown, moist, tracegravel
- some gravel @ 1.83-3.05m
SAND - brown, moist, trace silt
- becomes moist to wet, silty @ 4.27-6.1m
- becomes wet @ 4.88m
- becomes grey, with trace silt @ 5.33m
END of BOREHOLE @ 6.71m
Groundwater elevation @ 76.12m asl. on 1 August2012
79.891.22
78.063.05
74.406.71
50
90
80
100
90
90
100
90
100
100
100
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
SS-1
SS-2
SS-3
SS-4
SS-5
SS-6
SS-7
SS-8
SS-9
SS-10
SS-11
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
Metals & Inorganicsanalyses
PHCs analyses
Groundwateranalysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs
3456
34710
7131722
8162738
7142535
9182531
7172231
8172228
8161727
10222531
261215
Supervised by:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA03/07/2012
Sam
ple
Type
and
Num
ber
J.Jones
M.D.Weber
19/07/12
Wat
er L
evel
Con
dito
n
% R
ecov
ery
Boring date:
Project: Contract No:
ODOUR:
Stratigraphy
Blo
ws/
300m
m
DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES
Elev.(m )
Depth(m)
Driller:
NTMSVS
- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong
Wel
lD
etai
ls
Remarks andSample Analyses
(%LEL)
Sheet 1 of 1
Scale(m)
Headspace TOV
Headspace TOV
Sym
bol
(ppm)
Borehole Location:
Samples
Description
Drilling Method:
Ground Surface Elevation: 81.11m 20 40 60 80
DCS
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL CERTIFICATES
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.121 GRANTON DRIVE, UNIT #11,RICHMOND HILL, ON L4B3N4 (905) 882-5984
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
Mike Muneswar, BSc (Chem), Senior Inorganic AnalystSOIL ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:
Inga Kuzmina, Organic Laboratory SupervisorTRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED:
PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 21
Jul 12, 2012
VERSION*: 1
Should you require any information regarding this analysis please contact your client services representative at (905) 712-5100
12T615770AGAT WORK ORDER:
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Laboratories (V1) Page 1 of 21
All samples will be disposed of within 30 days following analysis. Please contact the lab if you require additional sample storage time.
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta (APEGGA)Western Enviro-Agricultural Laboratory Association (WEALA)Environmental Services Association of Alberta (ESAA)
Member of:
*NOTES
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
MW12-5 SS5
8-10'
MW12-7 SS7
12-13.5'
MW12-4 SS2
2-4'
MW12-4 SS6
10-12'
MW12-6 SS1A
0-1.5'
MW12-6 SS3
4-6'
MW12-5 SS3
4-6'
MW12-7 SS2
2-4'
3475472 3475488 3475510 3475517 3475519 3475575Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475509 3475550
µg/g 0.81.3 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8Antimony <0.8
µg/g 118 3 3 5 4 8 3 8Arsenic 5
µg/g 2220 36 42 58 64 51 43 50Barium 44
µg/g 0.52.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 0.9Beryllium 0.6
µg/g 536 <5 5 8 7 9 5 17Boron 11
µg/g 0.10 0.82 0.96 0.54 0.45 0.32 0.18 3.74Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 0.94
µg/g 0.51.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Cadmium <0.5
µg/g 270 9 11 19 19 16 11 27Chromium 22
µg/g 0.521 3.7 4.6 9.8 9.2 7.8 5.4 18.3Cobalt 10.4
µg/g 192 18 14 20 19 94 11 25Copper 36
µg/g 1120 24 12 10 8 38 5 37Lead 20
µg/g 0.52 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 0.5Molybdenum 0.6
µg/g 182 8 9 18 18 15 11 34Nickel 21
µg/g 0.41.5 0.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Selenium <0.4
µg/g 0.20.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver <0.2
µg/g 0.41 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Thallium <0.4
µg/g 0.52.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.7Uranium <0.5
µg/g 186 20 21 26 27 23 19 32Vanadium 23
µg/g 5290 33 31 46 46 98 27 70Zinc 68
µg/g 0.20.66 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Chromium VI <0.2
µg/g 0.0400.051 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Cyanide <0.040
µg/g 0.100.27 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Mercury <0.10
mS/cm 0.0050.57 0.296 0.360 0.848 0.358 0.207 0.151 2.70Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.767
N/A N/A2.4 0.336 1.41 0.313 0.294 0.153 0.587 0.556Sodium Adsorption Ratio 0.910
pH Units 7.52 7.40 7.64 7.55 7.60 7.74 7.71pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction 9.62
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jun 29, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 27, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 12, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 2 of 21
MW12-9 SS4 7.
5-8.5
MW12-8 SS3
4-6'
MW12-8 SS7
12-14'
MW12-10 SS2
2-4'
MW12-D SS2
DUP
MW12-9 SS2
2-4'
MW12-H SS3
DUP
3475580 3475585 3475591 3475600 3475604Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475590 3475608
µg/g 0.81.3 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8Antimony
µg/g 118 5 5 5 5 3 3 5Arsenic
µg/g 2220 70 66 72 38 45 47 77Barium
µg/g 0.52.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6Beryllium
µg/g 536 7 7 5 5 <5 5 7Boron
µg/g 0.10 0.44 0.48 0.18 0.34 0.24 0.83 0.50Boron (Hot Water Soluble)
µg/g 0.51.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Cadmium
µg/g 270 21 23 19 19 11 10 24Chromium
µg/g 0.521 8.8 10.0 8.0 4.1 3.3 4.1 9.6Cobalt
µg/g 192 25 22 41 32 38 18 24Copper
µg/g 1120 23 19 20 24 29 20 19Lead
µg/g 0.52 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 1.7 0.6 <0.5 <0.5Molybdenum
µg/g 182 18 20 15 11 8 9 19Nickel
µg/g 0.41.5 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Selenium
µg/g 0.20.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver
µg/g 0.41 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Thallium
µg/g 0.52.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.6Uranium
µg/g 186 28 29 25 13 12 21 31Vanadium
µg/g 5290 59 53 58 51 53 33 61Zinc
µg/g 0.20.66 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 ISQ <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Chromium VI
µg/g 0.0400.051 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 ISQ <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Cyanide
µg/g 0.100.27 <0.10 <0.10 0.13 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Mercury
mS/cm 0.0050.57 0.506 0.298 0.620 0.451 0.151 0.334 0.513Electrical Conductivity (2:1)
N/A N/A2.4 1.81 2.40 8.15 4.10 1.02 0.358 1.96Sodium Adsorption Ratio
pH Units 7.64 7.68 7.66 ISQ 7.85 7.55 7.66pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3475472-3475590 EC & SAR were determined on the DI water extract obtained from the 2:1 leaching procedure (2 parts DI water:1 part soil). pH was determined on the 0.01M CaCl2 extract prepared at 2:1 ratio.
3475591 EC & SAR were determined on the DI water extract obtained from the 2:1 leaching procedure (2 parts DI water:1 part soil). ISQ = Insuffecient Sample
3475600-3475608 EC & SAR were determined on the DI water extract obtained from the 2:1 leaching procedure (2 parts DI water:1 part soil). pH was determined on the 0.01M CaCl2 extract prepared at 2:1 ratio.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jun 29, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 27, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 12, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 3 of 21
MW12-6 SS3
4-6'
MW12-8 SS6
10-12'
MW12-4 SS2
2-4'
MW12-4 SS6
10-12'
MW12-7 SS3
4-6'
MW12-7 SS5
8-10'
MW12-5 SS3
4-6'
MW12-8 SS2
2-4'
3475472 3475488 3475519 3475552 3475570 3475584Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475509 3475578
µg/g 0.050.09 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Naphthalene <0.05
µg/g 0.050.093 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthylene <0.05
µg/g 0.050.072 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthene <0.05
µg/g 0.050.12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Fluorene 0.05
µg/g 0.050.69 0.13 0.09 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.19Phenanthrene 0.53
µg/g 0.050.16 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Anthracene 0.13
µg/g 0.050.56 0.07 0.08 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.27Fluoranthene 0.83
µg/g 0.051 0.24 0.12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.24Pyrene 0.67
µg/g 0.050.36 0.06 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.12Benz(a)anthracene 0.35
µg/g 0.052.8 0.14 0.08 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.11Chrysene 0.33
µg/g 0.050.47 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.13Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.29
µg/g 0.050.48 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.11
µg/g 0.050.3 0.07 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.12Benzo(a)pyrene 0.30
µg/g 0.050.23 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.15
µg/g 0.050.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.05
µg/g 0.050.68 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.14
µg/g 0.050.59 0.23 0.16 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.052-and 1-methyl Naphthalene <0.05
% 0.1 6.8 16.2 10.0 9.2 11.3 9.3 8.9Moisture Content 17.1
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 106 93 86 78 76 81 74Chrysene-d12 8650-140
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jun 29, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 27, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 12, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 4 of 21
MW12-D SS2
DUP
MW12-9 SS2
2-4'
MW12-9 SS6
12.5-14'
MW12-10 SS2
2-4'
3475590 3475595 3475604Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475600
µg/g 0.050.09 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Naphthalene
µg/g 0.050.093 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthylene
µg/g 0.050.072 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthene
µg/g 0.050.12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Fluorene
µg/g 0.050.69 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.13Phenanthrene
µg/g 0.050.16 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Anthracene
µg/g 0.050.56 0.05 0.09 0.06 0.12Fluoranthene
µg/g 0.051 <0.05 0.12 0.05 0.21Pyrene
µg/g 0.050.36 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.07Benz(a)anthracene
µg/g 0.052.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.13Chrysene
µg/g 0.050.47 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.08Benzo(b)fluoranthene
µg/g 0.050.48 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(k)fluoranthene
µg/g 0.050.3 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.09Benzo(a)pyrene
µg/g 0.050.23 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
µg/g 0.050.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
µg/g 0.050.68 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
µg/g 0.050.59 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.132-and 1-methyl Naphthalene
% 0.1 7.7 11.0 8.5 6.6Moisture Content
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 72 79 63 106Chrysene-d12 50-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3475472-3475604 Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.Note: The result for Benzo(b)Fluoranthene is the total of the Benzo(b)&(j)Fluoranthene isomers because the isomers co-elute on the GC column.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jun 29, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 27, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 12, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 5 of 21
MW12-8 SS3
4-6'
MW12-4 SS3
4-6'
MW12-4 SS5
8-10'
MW12-H SS3
DUP
MW12-6 SS3
4-6'
3475481 3475484 3475580 RDL 3475608Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475519
µg/g 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3Aroclor 1242
µg/g 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3Aroclor 1248
µg/g 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3Aroclor 1254
µg/g 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3Aroclor 1260
µg/g 0.10.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3Polychlorinated Biphenyls
% 0.1 10.7 9.7 8.0 11.2 0.1 11.4Moisture Content
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 92 88 73 92 84Decachlorobiphenyl 60-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3475481-3475580 Results are based on the dry weight of soil extracted.
3475608 Results are based on the dry weight of soil extracted.Sample was diluted and Reporting Detection Limit raised due to chromatographic interference.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jun 29, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 27, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
O. Reg. 153(511) - PCBs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 12, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 6 of 21
MW12-6 SS7
12-14
MW12-8 SS8
14-16'
MW12-4 SS3
4-6'
MW12-5 SS5
8-10'
MW12-7 SS4
6-8'
MW12-7 SS6
10-12'
MW12-6 SS5
8-10'
MW12-8 SS5
8-10'
3475481 3475510 3475533 3475554 3475572 3475586Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475523 3475581
µg/g 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10) <5
µg/g 525 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX <5
µg/g 1010 48 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10F2 (C10 to C16) <10
µg/g 50240 360 <50 76 <50 69 <50 83F3 (C16 to C34) <50
µg/g 50120 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50F4 (C34 to C50) <50
µg/g 50120 NA NA NA NA NA NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons NA
% 0.1 10.7 16.3 11.7 20.4 15.9 10.2 15.5Moisture Content 13.2
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 73 95 69 65 94 81 102Terphenyl 12660-140
MW12-H SS8
DUP
MW12-9 SS5
10-12'
MW12-9 SS7
15-17'
MW12-10 SS3
6-8'
3475593 3475596 3475605Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475601
µg/g 5 <5 <5 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10)
µg/g 525 <5 <5 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX
µg/g 1010 <10 <10 <10 <10F2 (C10 to C16)
µg/g 50240 <50 100 <50 <50F3 (C16 to C34)
µg/g 50120 <50 <50 <50 <50F4 (C34 to C50)
µg/g 50120 NA NA NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons
% 0.1 7.1 16.2 13.0 14.4Moisture Content
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 127 123 135 116Terphenyl 60-140
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jun 29, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 27, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 12, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 7 of 21
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jun 29, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 27, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 12, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3475481-3475605 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified without the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 8 of 21
MW12-4 SS5
8-10'
MW12-4 SS8
14-16'
3475484 3475489Parameter G / S RDLUnit
µg/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02Benzene
µg/g 0.080.2 <0.08 <0.08Toluene
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture
µg/g 5 6 <5F1 (C6 to C10)
µg/g 525 6 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX
µg/g 1010 55 <10F2 (C10 to C16)
µg/g 50240 150 65F3 (C16 to C34)
µg/g 50120 <50 <50F4 (C34 to C50)
µg/g 50120 NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons
% 0.1 9.7 12.1Moisture Content
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 91 72Terphenyl 60-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3475484-3475489 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified with the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.Quality Control Data is available upon request.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jun 29, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 27, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 12, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 9 of 21
MW12-6 SS7
12-14
MW12-8 SS8
14-16'
MW12-4 SS3
4-6'
MW12-5 SS5
8-10'
MW12-7 SS4
6-8'
MW12-7 SS6
10-12'
MW12-6 SS5
8-10'
MW12-8 SS5
8-10'
3475481 3475510 3475533 3475554 3475572 3475586Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475523 3475581
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.05
ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Vinyl Chloride <0.02
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromomethane <0.05
ug/g 0.050.25 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trichlorofluoromethane <0.05
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Acetone <0.50
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1-Dichloroethylene <0.05
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methylene Chloride <0.05
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene <0.05
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methyl tert-butyl Ether <0.05
ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.021,1-Dichloroethane <0.02
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Ethyl Ketone <0.50
ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene <0.02
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04Chloroform <0.04
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloroethane <0.03
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.05
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Carbon Tetrachloride <0.05
ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Benzene <0.02
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloropropane <0.03
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03Trichloroethylene <0.03
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromodichloromethane <0.05
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Isobutyl Ketone <0.50
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.04
ug/g 0.050.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Toluene <0.05
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibromochloromethane <0.05
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04Ethylene Dibromide <0.04
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Tetrachloroethylene <0.05
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.04
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chlorobenzene <0.05
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene <0.05
ug/g 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05m & p-Xylene <0.05
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromoform <0.05
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Styrene <0.05
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jun 29, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 27, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 12, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 10 of 21
MW12-6 SS7
12-14
MW12-8 SS8
14-16'
MW12-4 SS3
4-6'
MW12-5 SS5
8-10'
MW12-7 SS4
6-8'
MW12-7 SS6
10-12'
MW12-6 SS5
8-10'
MW12-8 SS5
8-10'
3475481 3475510 3475533 3475554 3475572 3475586Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475523 3475581
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.05
ug/g 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05o-Xylene <0.05
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.05
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.05
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.05
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture <0.05
µg/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,3-Dichloropropene <0.04
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05n-Hexane <0.05
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% Recovery 98 97 97 97 98 97 97Toluene-d8 1050-140
% Recovery 100 96 97 94 99 98 984-Bromofluorobenzene 9850-140
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jun 29, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 27, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 12, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 11 of 21
MW12-H SS8
DUP
MW12-9 SS5
10-12'
MW12-9 SS7
15-17'
MW12-10 SS3
6-8'
3475593 3475596 3475605Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475601
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Vinyl Chloride
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromomethane
ug/g 0.050.25 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trichlorofluoromethane
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Acetone
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1-Dichloroethylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methylene Chloride
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methyl tert-butyl Ether
ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.021,1-Dichloroethane
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Ethyl Ketone
ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04Chloroform
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloroethane
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Carbon Tetrachloride
ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Benzene
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloropropane
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03Trichloroethylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromodichloromethane
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/g 0.050.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Toluene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibromochloromethane
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04Ethylene Dibromide
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Tetrachloroethylene
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene
ug/g 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05m & p-Xylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromoform
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Styrene
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jun 29, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 27, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 12, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 12 of 21
MW12-H SS8
DUP
MW12-9 SS5
10-12'
MW12-9 SS7
15-17'
MW12-10 SS3
6-8'
3475593 3475596 3475605Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475601
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/g 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05o-Xylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture
µg/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,3-Dichloropropene
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05n-Hexane
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% Recovery 98 97 95 95Toluene-d8 50-140
% Recovery 97 92 95 954-Bromofluorobenzene 50-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3475481-3475605 The sample was analysed using the high level technique. The sample wasextracted using methanol, a small amount of the methanol extract was diluted in water and the purge & trap GC/MS analysis was performed.Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jun 29, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 27, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 12, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 13 of 21
3475481 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Soil) F2 (C10 to C16) 10 48MW12-4 SS3 4-6'
3475481 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Soil) F3 (C16 to C34) 240 360MW12-4 SS3 4-6'
3475484 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (Soil) F2 (C10 to C16) 10 55MW12-4 SS5 8-10'
3475509 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 0.848MW12-5 SS3 4-6'
3475517 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Copper 92 94MW12-6 SS1A 0-1.5'
3475550 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 2.70MW12-7 SS2 2-4'
3475575 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 0.767MW12-7 SS7 12-13.5'
3475584 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil) Fluoranthene 0.56 0.83MW12-8 SS6 10-12'
3475590 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 0.620MW12-9 SS2 2-4'
3475590 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Sodium Adsorption Ratio 2.4 8.15MW12-9 SS2 2-4'
3475591 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Sodium Adsorption Ratio 2.4 4.10MW12-9 SS4 7.5-8.5
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
Guideline Violation
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
SAMPLEID GUIDELINE ANALYSIS PACKAGE PARAMETER GUIDEVALUE RESULTSAMPLE TITLE
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V1) Page 14 of 21
O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil)
Antimony 1 3475608 < 0.8 < 0.8 0.0% < 0.8 128% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 82% 70% 130%
Arsenic 1 3475608 5 5 0.0% < 1 108% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 103% 70% 130%
Barium 1 3475608 77 71 8.1% < 2 98% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 104% 70% 130%
Beryllium 1 3475608 0.6 0.6 0.0% < 0.5 95% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%
Boron
1 3475608 7 7 0.0% < 5 78% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%
Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 1 3475509 0.54 0.55 0.7% < 0.10 92% 60% 140% 95% 70% 130% 95% 60% 140%
Cadmium 1 3475608 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 105% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 96% 70% 130%
Chromium 1 3475608 24 23 4.3% < 2 97% 70% 130% 118% 80% 120% 116% 70% 130%
Cobalt 1 3475608 9.6 9.3 3.2% < 0.5 95% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%
Copper
1 3475608 24 24 0.0% < 1 95% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%
Lead 1 3475608 19 20 5.1% < 1 109% 70% 130% 112% 80% 120% 106% 70% 130%
Molybdenum 1 3475608 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 106% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 103% 70% 130%
Nickel 1 3475608 19 19 0.0% < 1 95% 70% 130% 95% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%
Selenium 1 3475608 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 74% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%
Silver
1 3475608 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 76% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%
Thallium 1 3475608 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 95% 70% 130% 90% 80% 120% 85% 70% 130%
Uranium 1 3475608 0.6 0.6 0.0% < 0.5 114% 70% 130% 117% 80% 120% 119% 70% 130%
Vanadium 1 3475608 31 30 3.3% < 1 92% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%
Zinc 1 3475608 61 60 1.7% < 5 95% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%
Chromium VI
1 3475472 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 102% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 105% 70% 130%
Cyanide 1 3475608 < 0.040 < 0.040 0.0% < 0.040 101% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 86% 70% 130%
Mercury 1 3475608 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 120% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 105% 70% 130%
Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 1 3475509 0.848 0.840 0.9% < 0.005 92% 90% 110% NA NA
Sodium Adsorption Ratio 1 3475509 0.313 0.297 5.1% N/A NA NA NA
pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction
1 3475585 7.68 7.64 0.5% NA 99% 90% 110% NA NA
Certified By:
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Soil Analysis
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 12, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 15 of 21
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil)
Naphthalene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 80% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140% 68% 50% 140%
Acenaphthylene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 89% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140% 71% 50% 140%
Acenaphthene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 92% 50% 140% 86% 50% 140% 72% 50% 140%
Fluorene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 92% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%
Phenanthrene
1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 100% 50% 140% 93% 50% 140%
Anthracene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 96% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140%
Fluoranthene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 104% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140%
Pyrene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 108% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%
Benz(a)anthracene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 90% 50% 140% 113% 50% 140% 103% 50% 140%
Chrysene
1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 113% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140%
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 82% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140%
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 86% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140%
Benzo(a)pyrene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 98% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140%
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 114% 50% 140% 111% 50% 140% 100% 50% 140%
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 111% 50% 140% 113% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140%
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 91% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140% 89% 50% 140%
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1 3475552 0.06 0.06 0.0% < 0.05 83% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140%
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Soil)
F2 (C10 to C16) 1 <10 <10 0.0% < 10 98% 60% 140% 94% 80% 120% 93% 60% 140%
F3 (C16 to C34) 1 <50 <50 0.0% < 50 101% 60% 140% 95% 80% 120% 122% 60% 140%
F4 (C34 to C50) 1 <50 < 50 0.0% < 50 103% 60% 140% 118% 80% 120% 97% 60% 140%
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140%
Vinyl Chloride 1 3475596 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 83% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140%
Bromomethane 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 84% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140% 100% 50% 140%
Trichlorofluoromethane 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140% 116% 50% 140%
Acetone
1 3475596 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 106% 50% 140% 95% 50% 140% 108% 50% 140%
1,1-Dichloroethylene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 76% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%
Methylene Chloride 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 127% 50% 140% 79% 60% 130% 72% 50% 140%
Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 74% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%
Methyl tert-butyl Ether 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 82% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 3475596 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 77% 50% 140% 87% 60% 130% 80% 50% 140%
Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1 3475596 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 99% 50% 140% 106% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140%
Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 3475596 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 71% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 83% 50% 140%
Chloroform 1 3475596 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 80% 50% 140% 95% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%
1,2-Dichloroethane 1 3475596 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 85% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 94% 50% 140% 111% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 84% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 92% 50% 140%
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Trace Organics Analysis
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 12, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 16 of 21
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Benzene 1 3475596 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 80% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%
1,2-Dichloropropane 1 3475596 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 70% 50% 140% 85% 60% 130% 77% 50% 140%
Trichloroethylene 1 3475596 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 86% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 88% 50% 140%
Bromodichloromethane
1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 97% 60% 130% 88% 50% 140%
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 1 3475596 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 121% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140%
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 3475596 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 85% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 84% 50% 140%
Toluene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 97% 50% 140% 88% 60% 130% 79% 50% 140%
Dibromochloromethane 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%
Ethylene Dibromide
1 3475596 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 83% 50% 140% 98% 60% 130% 88% 50% 140%
Tetrachloroethylene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 78% 50% 140% 107% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 3475596 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 NA 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 89% 50% 140%
Chlorobenzene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 91% 50% 140% 95% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%
Ethylbenzene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 76% 50% 140% 95% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%
m & p-Xylene
1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 96% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 90% 50% 140%
Bromoform 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 87% 50% 140% 117% 60% 130% 109% 50% 140%
Styrene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 83% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 91% 50% 140%
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 NA 50% 140% 105% 60% 130% 83% 50% 140%
o-Xylene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 88% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 110% 60% 130% 109% 50% 140%
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 92% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 100% 50% 140%
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 100% 50% 140%
Xylene Mixture 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 88% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%
1,3-Dichloropropene 1 3475596 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 79% 50% 140% 112% 60% 130% 89% 50% 140%
n-Hexane
1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 NA 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 75% 50% 140%
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (Soil)
Benzene 1 3475596 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 96% 50% 140% 102% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%
Toluene 1 3475596 < 0.08 < 0.08 0.0% < 0.08 118% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 102% 50% 140%
Ethylbenzene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 105% 50% 140% 102% 60% 130% 102% 50% 140%
Xylene Mixture 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 108% 50% 140% 98% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%
F1 (C6 to C10)
1 3475596 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 90% 60% 140% 80% 80% 120% 77% 60% 140%
O. Reg. 153(511) - PCBs (Soil)
Aroclor 1242 1 3475481 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%
Aroclor 1248 1 3475481 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%
Aroclor 1254 1 3475481 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%
Aroclor 1260 1 3475481 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
1 3475481 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 112% 60% 140% 92% 60% 140% 91% 60% 140%
O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil)
Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 71% 50% 140% 68% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140%
Acenaphthylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 83% 50% 140% 66% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140%
Acenaphthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 86% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140% 70% 50% 140%
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Trace Organics Analysis (Continued)
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 12, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 17 of 21
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Fluorene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 94% 50% 140% 67% 50% 140% 66% 50% 140%
Phenanthrene
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 104% 50% 140% 70% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140%
Anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 112% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140% 71% 50% 140%
Fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 125% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140%
Pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 126% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140% 70% 50% 140%
Benz(a)anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 128% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140% 68% 50% 140%
Chrysene
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 117% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140%
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 84% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140%
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 79% 50% 140% 73% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140%
Benzo(a)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 67% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140%
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 111% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 79% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 79% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140% 66% 50% 140%
Certified By:
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Trace Organics Analysis (Continued)
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 12, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 18 of 21
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Soil Analysis
Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Boron (Hot Water Soluble) MET-93-6104EPA SW 846 6010C; MSA, Part 3, Ch.21
ICP/OES
Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Chromium VI INOR-93-6029 SM 3500 B; MSA Part 3, Ch. 25 SPECTROPHOTOMETER
Cyanide INOR-93-6052MOE CN-3015 & E 3009 A;SM 4500 CN
TECHNICON AUTO ANALYZER
Mercury MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Electrical Conductivity (2:1) INOR-93-6036 McKeague 4.12, SM 2510 B EC METER
Sodium Adsorption Ratio INOR-93-6007McKeague 4.12 & 3.26 & EPA SW-846 6010C
ICP/OES
pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction INOR-93-6031 MSA part 3 & SM 4500-H+ B PH METER
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 19 of 21
Trace Organics Analysis
Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Acenaphthylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Acenaphthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Fluorene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Phenanthrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benz(a)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Chrysene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(k)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Moisture Content Org 5506 EPA SW-846 3540 & 8270 BALANCE
Chrysene-d12 ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Aroclor 1242 ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD
Aroclor 1248 ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD
Aroclor 1254 ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD
Aroclor 1260 ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD
Polychlorinated Biphenyls ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD
Decachlorobiphenyl ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD
Moisture Content MOE E3139 BALANCE
F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P &T GC / FID
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P & T GC / FID
F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F3 (C16 to C34) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F4 (C34 to C50) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS
Moisture Content VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035,8015
BALANCE
Terphenyl VOL-91-5009 GC/FID
Benzene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS
Toluene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS
Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS
Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS
F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method P & T GC/FID
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method P & T GC/FID
F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, EPA SW846 8015
GC / FID
F3 (C16 to C34) VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, EPA SW846 8015
GC / FID
F4 (C34 to C50) VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, EPA SW846 8015
GC / FID
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method BALANCE
Moisture Content VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method BALANCE
Terphenyl VOL-91-5009 GC/FID
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 20 of 21
Dichlorodifluoromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Vinyl Chloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromomethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trichlorofluoromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Acetone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methylene Chloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl tert-butyl Ether VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl Ethyl Ketone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chloroform VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,1-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Carbon Tetrachloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Benzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichloropropane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromodichloromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,2-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Dibromochloromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Ethylene Dibromide VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Tetrachloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
m & p-Xylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromoform VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Styrene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
o-Xylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,3-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,4-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,3-Dichloropropene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
n-Hexane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene-d8 VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
4-Bromofluorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 21 of 21
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.121 GRANTON DRIVE, UNIT #11,RICHMOND HILL, ON L4B3N4 (905) 882-5984
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
Mike Muneswar, BSc (Chem), Senior Inorganic AnalystSOIL ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:
Jacky Takeuchi, BScH (Chem Eng), BSc (Bio), C.Chem, Laboratory Manager
TRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED:
PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 29
Jul 24, 2012
VERSION*: 1
Should you require any information regarding this analysis please contact your client services representative at (905) 712-5100
12T616706AGAT WORK ORDER:
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Laboratories (V1) Page 1 of 29
All samples will be disposed of within 30 days following analysis. Please contact the lab if you require additional sample storage time.
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta (APEGGA)Western Enviro-Agricultural Laboratory Association (WEALA)Environmental Services Association of Alberta (ESAA)
Member of:
*NOTES
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
Comp. of
MW12-1 SS17A
& MW12-1 17B
Comp. of
MW12-2 SS8,
SS11, SS18,
SS4
3498271 3498272Parameter G / S RDLUnit
mg/L 0.010 <0.010 0.044Arsenic Leachate
mg/L 0.100 0.549 0.183Barium Leachate
mg/L 0.050 <0.050 0.077Boron Leachate
mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.010Cadmium Leachate
mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.010Chromium Leachate
mg/L 0.010 0.036 <0.010Lead Leachate
mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01Mercury Leachate
mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.010Selenium Leachate
mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.010Silver Leachate
mg/L 0.050 <0.050 <0.050Uranium Leachate
mg/L 0.05 0.30 0.13Fluoride Leachate
mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05Cyanide Leachate
mg/L 0.7 <0.7 <0.7(Nitrate + Nitrite) as N Leachate
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / StandardComments:
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 28, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Metals & Inorganics (Leachate)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 2 of 29
MW12-2 SS11
20-22
MW12-2 SS18
34-36
MW12-1 SS7
12-14
MW12-1 SS13
24-26
MW12-3 SS10
18-20
MW12-3 SS14
26-28
MW12-2 SS8
14-16
MW12-B SS18
34-36
3498232 3498234 3498245 3498257 3498268 3498273Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3498244 3498270
µg/g 0.81.3 6.8 0.8 6.2 7.0 10.0 <0.8 <0.8Antimony <0.8
µg/g 118 10 8 10 11 8 3 7Arsenic 7
µg/g 2220 1110 107 1050 1110 1240 73 47Barium 49
µg/g 0.52.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9Beryllium 0.9
µg/g 536 8 14 9 8 5 6 15Boron 16
µg/g 0.10 1.04 1.24 1.04 1.04 0.93 1.33 2.70Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 2.50
µg/g 0.51.2 5.5 1.4 6.7 8.2 17.6 <0.5 <0.5Cadmium <0.5
µg/g 270 179 49 169 250 278 19 26Chromium 28
µg/g 0.521 8.2 12.1 8.0 9.3 11.2 6.9 15.8Cobalt 15.8
µg/g 192 1630 115 1550 1640 1550 21 27Copper 26
µg/g 1120 109 35 96 154 331 24 9Lead 10
µg/g 0.52 17.1 3.2 15.9 16.0 9.6 <0.5 <0.5Molybdenum 0.5
µg/g 182 68 32 66 79 108 14 32Nickel 33
µg/g 0.41.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Selenium <0.4
µg/g 0.20.5 49.3 3.8 43.7 49.4 43.9 0.4 0.2Silver <0.2
µg/g 0.41 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Thallium <0.4
µg/g 0.52.5 7.1 0.8 7.6 7.1 5.2 <0.5 0.6Uranium 0.6
µg/g 186 33 31 35 40 32 26 33Vanadium 32
µg/g 5290 1630 179 1470 1610 1510 56 75Zinc 79
µg/g 0.20.66 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 ISQ <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Chromium VI <0.2
µg/g 0.0400.051 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Cyanide <0.040
µg/g 0.100.27 1.26 0.11 0.95 1.42 1.38 <0.10 <0.10Mercury <0.10
mS/cm 0.0050.57 0.957 0.371 1.10 1.33 1.10 1.46 0.555Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.483
N/A N/A2.4 1.11 0.663 1.11 1.11 0.878 7.14 1.49Sodium Adsorption Ratio 2.20
pH Units 6.95 7.60 6.74 ISQ 6.91 7.75 7.84pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction 8.07
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3498232-3498273 EC & SAR were determined on the DI water extract obtained from the 2:1 leaching procedure (2 parts DI water:1 part soil). pH was determined on the 0.01M CaCl2 extract prepared at 2:1 ratio. Revised Jul 18, 2012.Revision: This report replaces the Certificate of Analysis issued on Jul 13, 2012 - Values for pH & Cr VI for sample 3498244 are included in this report.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 28, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised Final Report
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 3 of 29
Comp. of
MW12-1 SS17A
& MW12-1 17B
Comp. of
MW12-2 SS8,
SS11, SS18,
SS4
3498271 3498272Parameter G / S RDLUnit
mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001Benzo(a)pyrene
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / StandardComments:
3498271-3498272 The sample was leached according to Regulation 558 protocol. Analysis was performed on the leachate.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 28, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Benzo(a) pyrene (Leachate)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 4 of 29
MW12-3 SS14
26-28
MW12-1 SS13
24-26
MW12-1 SS17A
32-33.5
MW12-2 SS8
14-16
3498234 3498235 3498268Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3498244
µg/g 0.050.09 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Naphthalene
µg/g 0.050.093 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthylene
µg/g 0.050.072 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthene
µg/g 0.050.12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Fluorene
µg/g 0.050.69 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Phenanthrene
µg/g 0.050.16 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Anthracene
µg/g 0.050.56 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05Fluoranthene
µg/g 0.051 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05Pyrene
µg/g 0.050.36 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benz(a)anthracene
µg/g 0.052.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chrysene
µg/g 0.050.47 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(b)fluoranthene
µg/g 0.050.48 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(k)fluoranthene
µg/g 0.050.3 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(a)pyrene
µg/g 0.050.23 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
µg/g 0.050.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
µg/g 0.050.68 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
µg/g 0.050.59 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.052-and 1-methyl Naphthalene
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 60 62 78 59Chrysene-d12 50-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3498234-3498268 Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.Note: The result for Benzo(b)Fluoranthene is the total of the Benzo(b)&(j)Fluoranthene isomers because the isomers co-elute on the GC column.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 28, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 5 of 29
MW12-1 SS17A
32-33.5
3498235Parameter G / S RDLUnit
µg/g 0.1 <0.1Aroclor 1242
µg/g 0.1 <0.1Aroclor 1248
µg/g 0.1 <0.1Aroclor 1254
µg/g 0.1 <0.1Aroclor 1260
µg/g 0.10.3 <0.1Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 88Decachlorobiphenyl 60-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3498235 Results are based on the dry weight of soil extracted.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 29, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
O. Reg. 153(511) - PCBs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 6 of 29
MW12-2 SS11
20-22
MW12-3 SS12B
22.5-24
3498245 3498267Parameter G / S RDLUnit
µg/g 5 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10)
µg/g 525 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX
µg/g 1010 <10 <10F2 (C10 to C16)
µg/g 50240 <50 <50F3 (C16 to C34)
µg/g 50120 <50 <50F4 (C34 to C50)
µg/g 50120 NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons
% 0.1 34.0 8.2Moisture Content
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 140 128Terphenyl 60-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3498245-3498267 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified without the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 28, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 7 of 29
MW12-1 SS17A
32-33.5
3498235Parameter G / S RDLUnit
µg/g 5 6F1 (C6 to C10)
µg/g 525 6F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX
µg/g 1010 <10F2 (C10 to C16)
µg/g 1010 <10F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene
µg/g 50240 <50F3 (C16 to C34)
µg/g 50240 <50F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs
µg/g 50120 <50F4 (C34 to C50)
µg/g 50120 NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons
% 0.1 13.8Moisture Content
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 118Terphenyl 60-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3498235 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX and PAH contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 29, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 8 of 29
MW12-1 SS17A
32-33.5
MW12-2 SS11
20-22
MW12-3 SS12B
22.5-24
3498235 3498245Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3498267
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Vinyl Chloride
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromomethane
ug/g 0.050.25 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trichlorofluoromethane
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Acetone
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1-Dichloroethylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methylene Chloride
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methyl tert-butyl Ether
ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.021,1-Dichloroethane
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Ethyl Ketone
ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04Chloroform
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloroethane
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Carbon Tetrachloride
ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Benzene
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloropropane
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03Trichloroethylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromodichloromethane
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/g 0.050.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Toluene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibromochloromethane
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04Ethylene Dibromide
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Tetrachloroethylene
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene
ug/g 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05m & p-Xylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromoform
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Styrene
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 28, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 9 of 29
MW12-1 SS17A
32-33.5
MW12-2 SS11
20-22
MW12-3 SS12B
22.5-24
3498235 3498245Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3498267
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/g 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05o-Xylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture
µg/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,3-Dichloropropene
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05n-Hexane
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% Recovery 122 122 102Toluene-d8 50-140
% Recovery 94 95 704-Bromofluorobenzene 50-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3498235-3498267 The sample was analysed using the high level technique. The sample wasextracted using methanol, a small amount of the methanol extract was diluted in water and the purge & trap GC/MS analysis was performed.Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 28, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 10 of 29
MW12-1 SS18
34-36
3498238Parameter G / S RDLUnit
µg/g 5 <5F1 (C6 to C10)
µg/g 525 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3498238 Results are based on sample WET weight. No soil jar was provided by the client to determine moisture content.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified without the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 29, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
PHCs F1 (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 11 of 29
Comp. of
MW12-1 SS17A
& MW12-1 17B
Comp. of
MW12-2 SS8,
SS11, SS18,
SS4
3498271 3498272Parameter G / S RDLUnit
µg/L 20 <20 <20Benzene
µg/L 20 <20 <20Toluene
µg/L 10 <10 <10Ethylbenzene
µg/L 14 <14 <14Xylenes (Total)
µg/L 1000 <1000 <1000C6 - C10 (F1)
µg/L 1000 <1000 <1000C6 - C10 (F1 minus BTEX)
µg/L 100 3000 <100C>10 - C16 (F2)
µg/L 500 6400 850C>16 - C34 (F3)
µg/L 500 1200 <500C>34 - C50
µg/L 500 NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / StandardComments:
3498271-3498272 Sample was prepared using Regulation 558 protocol and a zero headspace extractor for BTEX/F1.Analysis performed on leachate.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using Toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and nC34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16 - C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 Hydrocarbons indicated that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6-C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified with the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 28, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Petroleum Hydrocarbon F1 - F4 (Leachate)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 12 of 29
Comp. of
MW12-1 SS17A
& MW12-1 17B
Comp. of
MW12-2 SS8,
SS11, SS18,
SS4
3498271 3498272Parameter G / S RDLUnit
mg/L 0.030 <0.030 <0.030Vinyl Chloride
mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.0201,1 Dichloroethene
mg/L 0.030 <0.030 <0.030Dichloromethane
mg/L 0.090 <0.090 <0.090Methyl Ethyl Ketone
mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.020Chloroform
mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.0201,2-Dichloroethane
mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.020Carbon Tetrachloride
mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.020Benzene
mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.020Trichloroethene
mg/L 0.050 <0.050 <0.050Tetrachloroethene
mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.010Chlorobenzene
mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.0101,2-Dichlorobenzene
mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.0101,4-Dichlorobenzene
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% Recovery 108 122Toluene-d8 60-130
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / StandardComments:
3498271-3498272 Sample was prepared using Regulation 558 protocol and a zero headspace extractor.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 28, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
VOCs (Leachate)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 13 of 29
MW12-1 SS18
34-36
3498238Parameter G / S RDLUnit
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02Vinyl Chloride
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Bromomethane
ug/g 0.050.25 <0.05Trichlorofluoromethane
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50Acetone
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,1-Dichloroethylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Methylene Chloride
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Methyl tert-butyl Ether
ug/g 0.020.05 <0.021,1-Dichloroethane
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50Methyl Ethyl Ketone
ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04Chloroform
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.031,2-Dichloroethane
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Carbon Tetrachloride
ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02Benzene
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.031,2-Dichloropropane
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03Trichloroethylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Bromodichloromethane
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.041,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/g 0.050.2 <0.05Toluene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Dibromochloromethane
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04Ethylene Dibromide
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Tetrachloroethylene
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.041,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Chlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene
ug/g 0.05 <0.05m & p-Xylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Bromoform
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Styrene
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 29, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
VOCs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 14 of 29
MW12-1 SS18
34-36
3498238Parameter G / S RDLUnit
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/g 0.05 <0.05o-Xylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture
µg/g 0.040.05 <0.041,3-Dichloropropene
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05n-Hexane
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% Recovery 83Toluene-d8 50-140
% Recovery 924-Bromofluorobenzene 50-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3498238 The sample was analysed using the high level technique. The sample wasextracted using methanol, a small amount of the methanol extract was diluted in water and the purge & trap GC/MS analysis was performed.Results are based on sample WET weight. No soil jar was provided by the client to determine moisture content.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 29, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
VOCs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 24, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 15 of 29
3498232 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportAntimony 1.3 6.8MW12-1 SS7 12-14
3498232 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportBarium 220 1110MW12-1 SS7 12-14
3498232 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportCadmium 1.2 5.5MW12-1 SS7 12-14
3498232 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportChromium 70 179MW12-1 SS7 12-14
3498232 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportCopper 92 1630MW12-1 SS7 12-14
3498232 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportElectrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 0.957MW12-1 SS7 12-14
3498232 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportMercury 0.27 1.26MW12-1 SS7 12-14
3498232 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportMolybdenum 2 17.1MW12-1 SS7 12-14
3498232 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportSilver 0.5 49.3MW12-1 SS7 12-14
3498232 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportUranium 2.5 7.1MW12-1 SS7 12-14
3498232 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportZinc 290 1630MW12-1 SS7 12-14
3498234 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportCadmium 1.2 1.4MW12-1 SS13 24-26
3498234 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportCopper 92 115MW12-1 SS13 24-26
3498234 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportMolybdenum 2 3.2MW12-1 SS13 24-26
3498234 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportSilver 0.5 3.8MW12-1 SS13 24-26
3498244 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportAntimony 1.3 6.2MW12-2 SS8 14-16
3498244 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportBarium 220 1050MW12-2 SS8 14-16
3498244 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportCadmium 1.2 6.7MW12-2 SS8 14-16
3498244 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportChromium 70 169MW12-2 SS8 14-16
3498244 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportCopper 92 1550MW12-2 SS8 14-16
3498244 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportElectrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 1.10MW12-2 SS8 14-16
3498244 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportMercury 0.27 0.95MW12-2 SS8 14-16
3498244 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportMolybdenum 2 15.9MW12-2 SS8 14-16
3498244 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportSilver 0.5 43.7MW12-2 SS8 14-16
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
Guideline Violation
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
SAMPLEID GUIDELINE ANALYSIS PACKAGE PARAMETER GUIDEVALUE RESULTSAMPLE TITLE
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V1) Page 16 of 29
3498244 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportUranium 2.5 7.6MW12-2 SS8 14-16
3498244 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportZinc 290 1470MW12-2 SS8 14-16
3498245 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportAntimony 1.3 7.0MW12-2 SS11 20-22
3498245 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportBarium 220 1110MW12-2 SS11 20-22
3498245 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportCadmium 1.2 8.2MW12-2 SS11 20-22
3498245 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportChromium 70 250MW12-2 SS11 20-22
3498245 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportCopper 92 1640MW12-2 SS11 20-22
3498245 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportElectrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 1.33MW12-2 SS11 20-22
3498245 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportLead 120 154MW12-2 SS11 20-22
3498245 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportMercury 0.27 1.42MW12-2 SS11 20-22
3498245 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportMolybdenum 2 16.0MW12-2 SS11 20-22
3498245 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportSilver 0.5 49.4MW12-2 SS11 20-22
3498245 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportUranium 2.5 7.1MW12-2 SS11 20-22
3498245 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportZinc 290 1610MW12-2 SS11 20-22
3498257 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportAntimony 1.3 10.0MW12-3 SS10 18-20
3498257 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportBarium 220 1240MW12-3 SS10 18-20
3498257 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportCadmium 1.2 17.6MW12-3 SS10 18-20
3498257 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportChromium 70 278MW12-3 SS10 18-20
3498257 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportCopper 92 1550MW12-3 SS10 18-20
3498257 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportElectrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 1.10MW12-3 SS10 18-20
3498257 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportLead 120 331MW12-3 SS10 18-20
3498257 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportMercury 0.27 1.38MW12-3 SS10 18-20
3498257 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportMolybdenum 2 9.6MW12-3 SS10 18-20
3498257 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportNickel 82 108MW12-3 SS10 18-20
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
Guideline Violation
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
SAMPLEID GUIDELINE ANALYSIS PACKAGE PARAMETER GUIDEVALUE RESULTSAMPLE TITLE
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V1) Page 17 of 29
3498257 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportSilver 0.5 43.9MW12-3 SS10 18-20
3498257 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportUranium 2.5 5.2MW12-3 SS10 18-20
3498257 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportZinc 290 1510MW12-3 SS10 18-20
3498268 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportElectrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 1.46MW12-3 SS14 26-28
3498268 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised
Final ReportSodium Adsorption Ratio 2.4 7.14MW12-3 SS14 26-28
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
Guideline Violation
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
SAMPLEID GUIDELINE ANALYSIS PACKAGE PARAMETER GUIDEVALUE RESULTSAMPLE TITLE
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V1) Page 18 of 29
O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised Final Report
Antimony 1 < 0.8 < 0.8 0.0% < 0.8 114% 70% 130% 82% 80% 120% 82% 70% 130%
Arsenic 1 3 3 0.0% < 1 111% 70% 130% 111% 80% 120% 108% 70% 130%
Barium 1 57 59 3.4% < 2 101% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%
Beryllium 1 0.5 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 104% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 96% 70% 130%
Boron
1 7 6 15.4% < 5 80% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%
Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 1 3498268 1.33 1.40 4.8% < 0.10 100% 60% 140% 103% 70% 130% 107% 60% 140%
Cadmium 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 104% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%
Chromium 1 18 18 0.0% < 2 100% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%
Cobalt 1 7.8 8.0 2.5% < 0.5 104% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%
Copper
1 20 21 4.9% < 1 101% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%
Lead 1 8 8 0.0% < 1 98% 70% 130% 95% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%
Molybdenum 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 102% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 107% 70% 130%
Nickel 1 17 17 0.0% < 1 105% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%
Selenium 1 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 86% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 96% 70% 130%
Silver
1 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 98% 70% 130% 81% 80% 120% 86% 70% 130%
Thallium 1 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 101% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 106% 70% 130%
Uranium 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 98% 70% 130% 92% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%
Vanadium 1 26 26 0.0% < 1 95% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%
Zinc 1 43 43 0.0% < 5 101% 70% 130% 112% 80% 120% 110% 70% 130%
Chromium VI
1 3498257 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 94% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%
Cyanide 1 3498232 < 0.040 < 0.040 0.0% < 0.040 99% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 86% 70% 130%
Mercury 1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 118% 70% 130% 114% 80% 120% 112% 70% 130%
Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 1 3498257 1.10 1.09 0.9% < 0.005 92% 90% 110% NA NA
Sodium Adsorption Ratio 1 3498257 0.878 0.895 2.0% N/A NA NA NA
pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction
1 3498232 6.95 6.95 0.0% < 93% 90% 110% NA NA
Comments: NA - Not Applicable.
Metals & Inorganics (Leachate)
Arsenic Leachate 1 0.010 0.010 0.0% < 0.010 105% 90% 110% 106% 80% 120% 113% 70% 130%
Barium Leachate 1 0.671 0.645 4.0% < 0.100 104% 90% 110% 104% 80% 120% 118% 70% 130%
Boron Leachate 1 0.085 0.084 1.2% < 0.050 103% 90% 110% 88% 80% 120% 83% 70% 130%
Cadmium Leachate 1 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.0% < 0.010 106% 90% 110% 97% 80% 120% 111% 70% 130%
Chromium Leachate
1 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.0% < 0.010 103% 90% 110% 95% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%
Lead Leachate 1 0.0249 0.0245 1.6% < 0.010 93% 90% 110% 91% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%
Mercury Leachate 1 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.0% < 0.01 106% 90% 110% 105% 80% 120% 111% 70% 130%
Selenium Leachate 1 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.0% < 0.010 101% 90% 110% 98% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%
Silver Leachate 1 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.0% < 0.010 102% 90% 110% 82% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%
Uranium Leachate
1 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.0% < 0.050 100% 90% 110% 91% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%
Fluoride Leachate 1 0.18 0.17 5.7% < 0.05 102% 90% 110% 104% 90% 110% 81% 70% 130%
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Soil Analysis
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 24, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 19 of 29
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Cyanide Leachate 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 99% 90% 110% 98% 90% 110% 94% 70% 130%
(Nitrate + Nitrite) as N Leachate 1 < 0.70 < 0.70 0.0% < 0.70 103% 80% 120% 102% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%
Certified By:
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Soil Analysis (Continued)
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 24, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 20 of 29
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Soil)
F1 (C6 to C10) 1 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 82% 60% 140% 81% 80% 120% 81% 60% 140%
F2 (C10 to C16) 1 < 10 < 10 0.0% < 10 97% 60% 140% 90% 80% 120% 86% 60% 140%
F3 (C16 to C34) 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 104% 60% 140% 85% 80% 120% 98% 60% 140%
F4 (C34 to C50) 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 93% 60% 140% 103% 80% 120% 99% 60% 140%
O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil)
Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 90% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140% 73% 50% 140%
Acenaphthylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%
Acenaphthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 96% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%
Fluorene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%
Phenanthrene
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%
Anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 97% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%
Fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 92% 50% 140% 87% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140%
Pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140%
Benz(a)anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 91% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%
Chrysene
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140%
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 124% 50% 140% 111% 50% 140% 102% 50% 140%
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140%
Benzo(a)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 125% 50% 140% 119% 50% 140% 108% 50% 140%
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 124% 50% 140% 117% 50% 140% 102% 50% 140%
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 107% 50% 140% 98% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140%
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 125% 50% 140% 125% 50% 140% 105% 50% 140%
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 92% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140%
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 120% 50% 140% 112% 50% 140% 119% 50% 140%
Vinyl Chloride 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 111% 50% 140% 119% 50% 140% 115% 50% 140%
Bromomethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 112% 50% 140% 119% 50% 140% 118% 50% 140%
Trichlorofluoromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 114% 50% 140% 111% 50% 140% 100% 50% 140%
Acetone
1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 99% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140%
1,1-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 111% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 102% 50% 140%
Methylene Chloride 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 103% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 77% 50% 140%
Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 110% 50% 140% 109% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%
Methyl tert-butyl Ether 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 71% 50% 140% 66% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 106% 50% 140% 102% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%
Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 64% 50% 140% 104% 50% 140% 66% 50% 140%
Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 95% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 95% 50% 140%
Chloroform 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 97% 50% 140% 98% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%
1,2-Dichloroethane 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 96% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Trace Organics Analysis
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 24, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 21 of 29
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%
Benzene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 100% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%
1,2-Dichloropropane 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 95% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%
Trichloroethylene 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 95% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%
Bromodichloromethane
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 87% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140%
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 109% 50% 140% 98% 60% 130% 105% 50% 140%
Toluene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 110% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%
Dibromochloromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 108% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%
Ethylene Dibromide
1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 107% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 101% 50% 140%
Tetrachloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 106% 50% 140% 87% 60% 130% 95% 50% 140%
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 NA 50% 140% 89% 60% 130% 94% 50% 140%
Chlorobenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 109% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%
Ethylbenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 110% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 105% 50% 140%
m & p-Xylene
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 113% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 102% 50% 140%
Bromoform 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 116% 50% 140% 89% 60% 130% 110% 50% 140%
Styrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 109% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 NA 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%
o-Xylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 111% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 113% 50% 140% 86% 60% 130% 106% 50% 140%
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 112% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 104% 50% 140%
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 114% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 104% 50% 140%
Xylene Mixture 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 111% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%
1,3-Dichloropropene 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 104% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%
n-Hexane
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 NA 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%
O. Reg. 153(511) - PCBs (Soil)
Aroclor 1242 1 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%
Aroclor 1248 1 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%
Aroclor 1254 1 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%
Aroclor 1260 1 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
1 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 98% 60% 140% 108% 60% 140% 103% 60% 140%
Benzo(a) pyrene (Leachate)
Benzo(a)pyrene 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.0% < 0.001 96% 70% 130% 100% 70% 130% 98% 70% 130%
Petroleum Hydrocarbon F1 - F4 (Leachate)
Benzene 1 < 20 < 20 0.0% < 20 89% 70% 130% 101% 70% 130% 100% 70% 130%
Toluene 1 < 20 < 20 0.0% < 20 87% 70% 130% 99% 70% 130% 97% 70% 130%
Ethylbenzene 1 < 10 < 10 0.0% < 10 84% 70% 130% 98% 70% 130% 95% 70% 130%
Xylenes (Total) 1 < 14 < 14 0.0% < 14 89% 70% 130% 98% 70% 130% 97% 70% 130%
C6 - C10 (F1)
1 < 1000 < 1000 0.0% < 1000 94% 70% 130% 75% 70% 130% 72% 70% 130%
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Trace Organics Analysis (Continued)
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 24, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 22 of 29
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
C>10 - C16 (F2) 1 < 100 < 100 0.0% < 100 101% 70% 130% 67% 70% 130% 64% 70% 130%
C>16 - C34 (F3) 1 < 100 < 100 0.0% < 500 101% 70% 130% 101% 70% 130% 106% 70% 130%
Petroleum Hydrocarbon F1 - F4 (Leachate)
C>10 - C16 (F2) 1 < 100 < 100 0.0% < 100 101% 70% 130% 67% 70% 130% 64% 70% 130%
C>16 - C34 (F3) 1 < 100 < 100 0.0% < 500 101% 70% 130% 101% 70% 130% 106% 70% 130%
Certified By:
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Trace Organics Analysis (Continued)
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 24, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 23 of 29
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Petroleum Hydrocarbon F1 - F4 (Leachate)
C>10 - C16 (F2) 101% 70% 130% 67% 70% 130% 64% 70% 130%Comp. of MW12-1 SS17A & MW12-1
Petroleum Hydrocarbon F1 - F4 (Leachate)
C>10 - C16 (F2) 101% 70% 130% 67% 70% 130% 64% 70% 130%Comp. of MW12-2 SS8, SS11, SS18,
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
Sample DescriptionMeasured
Value
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Recovery Recovery
QA Violation
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
UpperLower
AcceptableLimitsPARAMETER Sample Id
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKERPT Date: Jul 24, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 24 of 29
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Soil Analysis
Arsenic Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS
Barium Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS
Boron Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS
Cadmium Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS
Chromium Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS
Lead Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS
Mercury Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS
Selenium Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS
Silver Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS
Uranium Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS
Fluoride Leachate INOR-93-6018 EPA SW-846-1311 & SM4500-F- C ION SELECTIVE ELECTRODE
Cyanide Leachate INOR-93-6052EPA SW-846-1311 & MOE 3015 & SM 4500 CN- I
TECHNICON AUTO ANALYZER
(Nitrate + Nitrite) as N Leachate INOR-93-6053EPA SW 846-1311 & SM 4500 - NO3- I
LACHAT FIA
Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Boron (Hot Water Soluble) MET-93-6104EPA SW 846 6010C; MSA, Part 3, Ch.21
ICP/OES
Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Chromium VI INOR-93-6029 SM 3500 B; MSA Part 3, Ch. 25 SPECTROPHOTOMETER
Cyanide INOR-93-6052MOE CN-3015 & E 3009 A;SM 4500 CN
TECHNICON AUTO ANALYZER
Mercury MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Electrical Conductivity (2:1) INOR-93-6036 McKeague 4.12, SM 2510 B EC METER
Sodium Adsorption Ratio INOR-93-6007McKeague 4.12 & 3.26 & EPA SW-846 6010C
ICP/OES
pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction INOR-93-6031 MSA part 3 & SM 4500-H+ B PH METER
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 25 of 29
Trace Organics Analysis
Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5114 EPA SW846 3540 & 8270 GC/MS
Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Acenaphthylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Acenaphthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Fluorene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Phenanthrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benz(a)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Chrysene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(k)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Chrysene-d12 ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Aroclor 1242 ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD
Aroclor 1248 ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD
Aroclor 1254 ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD
Aroclor 1260 ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD
Polychlorinated Biphenyls ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD
Decachlorobiphenyl ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD
F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P &T GC / FID
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P & T GC / FID
F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F3 (C16 to C34) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F4 (C34 to C50) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS
Moisture Content VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035,8015
BALANCE
Terphenyl VOL-91-5009 GC/FID
F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F3 (C16 to C34) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F4 (C34 to C50) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS
Moisture Content VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method BALANCE
Terphenyl VOL-91-5009 GC/FID
Dichlorodifluoromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Vinyl Chloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromomethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trichlorofluoromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Acetone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 26 of 29
1,1-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methylene Chloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl tert-butyl Ether VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl Ethyl Ketone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chloroform VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,1-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Carbon Tetrachloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Benzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichloropropane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromodichloromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,2-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Dibromochloromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Ethylene Dibromide VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Tetrachloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
m & p-Xylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromoform VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Styrene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
o-Xylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,3-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,4-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,3-Dichloropropene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
n-Hexane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene-d8 VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
4-Bromofluorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P &T GC / FID
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P & T GC / FID
Benzene VOL 5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene VOL 5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Ethylbenzene VOL 5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Xylenes (Total) VOL 5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
C6 - C10 (F1) VOL - 5010 MOE E3421 (P&T)GC/FID
C6 - C10 (F1 minus BTEX) VOL - 5010 MOE E3421 (P&T)GC/FID
C>10 - C16 (F2) VOL - 5010 MOE E3421 GC/FID
C>16 - C34 (F3) VOL - 5010 MOE E3421 GC/FID
C>34 - C50 VOL - 5010 MOE E3421 GC/FID
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL - 5010 MOE E3421 (P&T)GC/FID
Vinyl Chloride VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 27 of 29
1,1 Dichloroethene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Dichloromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl Ethyl Ketone VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chloroform VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Carbon Tetrachloride VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Benzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trichloroethene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Tetrachloroethene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,4-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene-d8 VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Dichlorodifluoromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Vinyl Chloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromomethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trichlorofluoromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Acetone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methylene Chloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl tert-butyl Ether VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl Ethyl Ketone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chloroform VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,1-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Carbon Tetrachloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Benzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichloropropane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromodichloromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,2-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Dibromochloromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Ethylene Dibromide VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Tetrachloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
m & p-Xylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromoform VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Styrene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
o-Xylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,3-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,4-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 28 of 29
Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,3-Dichloropropene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
n-Hexane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene-d8 VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
4-Bromofluorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T616706
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 29 of 29
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.121 GRANTON DRIVE, UNIT #11,RICHMOND HILL, ON L4B3N4 (905) 882-5984
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
Mike Muneswar, BSc (Chem), Senior Inorganic AnalystSOIL ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:
Jacky Takeuchi, BScH (Chem Eng), BSc (Bio), C.Chem, Laboratory Manager
TRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED:
PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 14
Jul 17, 2012
VERSION*: 1
Should you require any information regarding this analysis please contact your client services representative at (905) 712-5100
12T617175AGAT WORK ORDER:
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Laboratories (V1) Page 1 of 14
All samples will be disposed of within 30 days following analysis. Please contact the lab if you require additional sample storage time.
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta (APEGGA)Western Enviro-Agricultural Laboratory Association (WEALA)Environmental Services Association of Alberta (ESAA)
Member of:
*NOTES
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
MW12-15 SS6
10'-12'
MW12-16 SS2
2'-4'
MW12-16 SS4
6'-8'
MW12-14 SS2
2'-4'
MW12-14 SS6
10'-12'
MW12-15 SS1
0'-2' MW12-P SS2
3488603 3488626 3488634 3488635 3488642Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3488633 3488644
µg/g 0.81.3 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 1.2 <0.8 <0.8Antimony
µg/g 118 5 5 5 2 5 4 5Arsenic
µg/g 2220 72 67 72 17 84 66 62Barium
µg/g 0.52.5 0.6 0.7 0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6Beryllium
µg/g 536 7 8 8 <5 8 8 6Boron
µg/g 0.10 0.17 0.15 0.72 0.10 1.19 0.12 0.16Boron (Hot Water Soluble)
µg/g 0.51.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2.9 <0.5 <0.5Cadmium
µg/g 270 21 19 20 7 50 20 18Chromium
µg/g 0.521 9.9 11.7 6.6 2.8 8.2 12.6 8.9Cobalt
µg/g 192 24 25 26 7 54 23 20Copper
µg/g 1120 8 10 20 3 98 9 7Lead
µg/g 0.52 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 <0.5 1.6 <0.5 <0.5Molybdenum
µg/g 182 23 28 16 6 30 25 21Nickel
µg/g 0.41.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Selenium
µg/g 0.20.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 1.0 <0.2 <0.2Silver
µg/g 0.41 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Thallium
µg/g 0.52.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Uranium
µg/g 186 28 26 25 13 25 28 25Vanadium
µg/g 5290 55 63 74 16 164 61 48Zinc
µg/g 0.20.66 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Chromium VI
µg/g 0.0400.051 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Cyanide
µg/g 0.100.27 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.83 <0.10 <0.10Mercury
mS/cm 0.0050.57 0.124 0.122 0.558 0.102 0.364 0.188 0.123Electrical Conductivity (2:1)
N/A N/A2.4 0.218 0.148 3.05 0.187 0.914 0.209 0.202Sodium Adsorption Ratio
pH Units 7.65 7.71 8.62 7.69 7.59 7.68 7.58pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3488603-3488644 EC & SAR were determined on the DI water extract obtained from the 2:1 leaching procedure (2 parts DI water:1 part soil). pH was determined on the 0.01M CaCl2 extract prepared at 2:1 ratio.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 05, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jul 03, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T617175
O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 2 of 14
MW12-15 SS1
0'-2'
MW12-14 SS2
2'-4' DUP 1L SS2
3488633 3488635Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3488645
µg/g 0.050.09 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Naphthalene
µg/g 0.050.093 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthylene
µg/g 0.050.072 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthene
µg/g 0.050.12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Fluorene
µg/g 0.050.69 0.05 0.11 <0.05Phenanthrene
µg/g 0.050.16 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Anthracene
µg/g 0.050.56 0.22 0.16 <0.05Fluoranthene
µg/g 0.051 0.23 0.14 <0.05Pyrene
µg/g 0.050.36 0.10 0.05 <0.05Benz(a)anthracene
µg/g 0.052.8 0.16 0.08 <0.05Chrysene
µg/g 0.050.47 0.15 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(b)fluoranthene
µg/g 0.050.48 0.06 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(k)fluoranthene
µg/g 0.050.3 0.13 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(a)pyrene
µg/g 0.050.23 0.08 <0.05 <0.05Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
µg/g 0.050.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
µg/g 0.050.68 0.08 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
µg/g 0.050.59 <0.05 <0.05 <0.052-and 1-methyl Naphthalene
% 0.1 7.8 13.5 14.2Moisture Content
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 104 101 90Chrysene-d12 50-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3488633-3488645 Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.Note: The result for Benzo(b)Fluoranthene is the total of the Benzo(b)&(j)Fluoranthene isomers because the isomers co-elute on the GC column.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 05, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jul 03, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T617175
O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 3 of 14
MW12-16 SS10
18'-20'
MW12-14 SS6
10'-12'
MW12-14 SS13
24'-26'
3488627 3488642Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3488643
µg/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Benzene
µg/g 0.080.2 <0.08 <0.08 <0.08Toluene
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture
µg/g 5 <5 12 <5F1 (C6 to C10)
µg/g 525 <5 12 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX
µg/g 1010 <10 <10 <10F2 (C10 to C16)
µg/g 50240 <50 <50 <50F3 (C16 to C34)
µg/g 50120 <50 <50 <50F4 (C34 to C50)
µg/g 50120 NA NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons
% 0.1 17.6 13.6 13.1Moisture Content
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 79 74 78Terphenyl 60-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3488627-3488643 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified with the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.Quality Control Data is available upon request.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 05, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jul 03, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T617175
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 4 of 14
MW12-14 SS2
2'-4'
3488635Parameter G / S RDLUnit
µg/g 5 8F1 (C6 to C10)
µg/g 525 8F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX
µg/g 1010 <10F2 (C10 to C16)
µg/g 1010 <10F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene
µg/g 50240 <50F3 (C16 to C34)
µg/g 50240 <50F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs
µg/g 50120 <50F4 (C34 to C50)
µg/g 50120 NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons
% 0.1 13.6Moisture Content
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 93Terphenyl 60-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3488635 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX and PAH contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 05, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jul 03, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T617175
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 5 of 14
MW12-14 SS2
2'-4'
3488635Parameter G / S RDLUnit
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02Vinyl Chloride
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Bromomethane
ug/g 0.050.25 <0.05Trichlorofluoromethane
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50Acetone
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,1-Dichloroethylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Methylene Chloride
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Methyl tert-butyl Ether
ug/g 0.020.05 <0.021,1-Dichloroethane
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50Methyl Ethyl Ketone
ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04Chloroform
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.031,2-Dichloroethane
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Carbon Tetrachloride
ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02Benzene
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.031,2-Dichloropropane
ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03Trichloroethylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Bromodichloromethane
ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.041,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/g 0.050.2 <0.05Toluene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Dibromochloromethane
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04Ethylene Dibromide
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Tetrachloroethylene
ug/g 0.040.05 <0.041,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Chlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene
ug/g 0.05 <0.05m & p-Xylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Bromoform
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Styrene
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 05, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jul 03, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T617175
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 6 of 14
MW12-14 SS2
2'-4'
3488635Parameter G / S RDLUnit
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ug/g 0.05 <0.05o-Xylene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture
µg/g 0.040.05 <0.041,3-Dichloropropene
µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05n-Hexane
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% Recovery 83Toluene-d8 50-140
% Recovery 1294-Bromofluorobenzene 50-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3488635 The sample was analysed using the high level technique. The sample wasextracted using methanol, a small amount of the methanol extract was diluted in water and the purge & trap GC/MS analysis was performed.Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 05, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jul 03, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T617175
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 7 of 14
3488633 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Sodium Adsorption Ratio 2.4 3.05MW12-15 SS1 0'-2'
3488635 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Cadmium 1.2 2.9MW12-14 SS2 2'-4'
3488635 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Mercury 0.27 0.83MW12-14 SS2 2'-4'
3488635 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Silver 0.5 1.0MW12-14 SS2 2'-4'
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
Guideline Violation
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T617175
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
SAMPLEID GUIDELINE ANALYSIS PACKAGE PARAMETER GUIDEVALUE RESULTSAMPLE TITLE
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V1) Page 8 of 14
O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil)
Antimony 1 < 0.8 < 0.8 0.0% < 0.8 112% 70% 130% 88% 80% 120% 91% 70% 130%
Arsenic 1 7 8 13.3% < 1 107% 70% 130% 95% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%
Barium 1 39 40 2.5% < 2 101% 70% 130% 86% 80% 120% 84% 70% 130%
Beryllium 1 1.0 1.0 0.0% < 0.5 92% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 88% 70% 130%
Boron
1 17 17 0.0% < 5 71% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 84% 70% 130%
Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 1 0.41 0.39 5.5% < 0.10 97% 60% 140% 99% 70% 130% 98% 60% 140%
Cadmium 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 99% 70% 130% 104% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%
Chromium 1 25 26 3.9% < 2 86% 70% 130% 91% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%
Cobalt 1 14.6 15.3 4.7% < 0.5 86% 70% 130% 84% 80% 120% 75% 70% 130%
Copper
1 24 24 0.0% < 1 95% 70% 130% 91% 80% 120% 76% 70% 130%
Lead 1 5 5 0.0% < 1 93% 70% 130% 86% 80% 120% 81% 70% 130%
Molybdenum 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 105% 70% 130% 95% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%
Nickel 1 36 38 5.4% < 1 93% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 83% 70% 130%
Selenium 1 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 82% 70% 130% 87% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%
Silver
1 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 101% 70% 130% 88% 80% 120% 86% 70% 130%
Thallium 1 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 104% 70% 130% 109% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%
Uranium 1 0.6 0.6 0.0% < 0.5 87% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 97% 70% 130%
Vanadium 1 29 31 6.7% < 1 91% 70% 130% 87% 80% 120% 78% 70% 130%
Zinc 1 71 74 4.1% < 5 109% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%
Chromium VI
1 3488644 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 95% 70% 130% 105% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%
Cyanide 1 3488635 < 0.040 < 0.040 0.0% < 0.040 96% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 88% 70% 130%
Mercury 1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 112% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 104% 70% 130%
Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 1 0.220 0.221 0.5% < 0.005 103% 90% 110% NA NA
Sodium Adsorption Ratio 1 0.129 0.130 1.1% N/A NA NA NA
pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction
1 3488633 8.62 8.59 0.3% NA 95% 90% 110% NA NA
Comments: NA signifies Not Applicable.
Certified By:
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T617175
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Soil Analysis
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 17, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 9 of 14
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 71% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140% 120% 50% 140%
Vinyl Chloride 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 80% 50% 140% 116% 50% 140% 125% 50% 140%
Bromomethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 124% 50% 140% 107% 50% 140% 104% 50% 140%
Trichlorofluoromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 116% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140% 112% 50% 140%
Acetone
1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 94% 50% 140% 114% 50% 140% 101% 50% 140%
1,1-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 112% 50% 140% 109% 60% 130% 95% 50% 140%
Methylene Chloride 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 105% 50% 140%
Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 110% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 114% 50% 140%
Methyl tert-butyl Ether 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 122% 50% 140% 115% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 101% 50% 140% 122% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%
Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 101% 50% 140% 117% 50% 140% 102% 50% 140%
Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 108% 50% 140% 110% 60% 130% 114% 50% 140%
Chloroform 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 113% 50% 140% 102% 60% 130% 120% 50% 140%
1,2-Dichloroethane 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 96% 50% 140% 103% 60% 130% 117% 50% 140%
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 123% 50% 140% 84% 60% 130% 115% 50% 140%
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 102% 50% 140% 105% 60% 130% 93% 50% 140%
Benzene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 86% 50% 140% 118% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%
1,2-Dichloropropane 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 102% 50% 140% 117% 60% 130% 106% 50% 140%
Trichloroethylene 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 99% 50% 140% 113% 60% 130% 109% 50% 140%
Bromodichloromethane
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 94% 50% 140% 114% 60% 130% 111% 50% 140%
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 88% 50% 140% 95% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140%
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 91% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%
Toluene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 106% 50% 140% 115% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%
Dibromochloromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 113% 50% 140% 104% 60% 130% 113% 50% 140%
Ethylene Dibromide
1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 106% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 106% 50% 140%
Tetrachloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 109% 50% 140% 105% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 NA 50% 140% 107% 60% 130% 115% 50% 140%
Chlorobenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 104% 50% 140% 107% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%
Ethylbenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 107% 50% 140% 110% 60% 130% 95% 50% 140%
m & p-Xylene
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 110% 50% 140% 111% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%
Bromoform 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 107% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 118% 50% 140%
Styrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 116% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 110% 50% 140%
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 NA 50% 140% 114% 60% 130% 113% 50% 140%
o-Xylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 103% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 109% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 97% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 101% 50% 140%
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 104% 50% 140% 98% 60% 130% 100% 50% 140%
Xylene Mixture 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 103% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%
1,3-Dichloropropene 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 93% 50% 140% 113% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T617175
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Trace Organics Analysis
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 17, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 10 of 14
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
n-Hexane
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 NA 50% 140% 109% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Soil)
F1 (C6 to C10) 1 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 75% 60% 140% 85% 80% 120% 73% 60% 140%
O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil)
Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 115% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%
Acenaphthylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 89% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140% 70% 50% 140%
Acenaphthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 102% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140%
Fluorene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%
Phenanthrene
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 105% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140%
Anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 80% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%
Fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 78% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140%
Pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 77% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140%
Benz(a)anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 77% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140%
Chrysene
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 84% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140%
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 76% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 124% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140%
Benzo(a)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 80% 50% 140% 73% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140%
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 86% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 90% 50% 140% 86% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140%
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 84% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140%
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140%
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (Soil)
Benzene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 114% 50% 140% 115% 60% 130% 101% 50% 140%
Toluene 1 < 0.08 < 0.08 0.0% < 0.08 120% 50% 140% 113% 60% 130% 92% 50% 140%
Ethylbenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 121% 50% 140% 112% 60% 130% 92% 50% 140%
Xylene Mixture 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 94% 50% 140% 112% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%
F1 (C6 to C10)
1 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 94% 60% 140% 80% 80% 120% 85% 60% 140%
F2 (C10 to C16) 1 < 10 < 10 0.0% < 10 99% 60% 140% 95% 80% 120% 66% 60% 140%
F3 (C16 to C34) 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 97% 60% 140% 96% 80% 120% 107% 60% 140%
F4 (C34 to C50) 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 92% 60% 140% 94% 80% 120% 79% 60% 140%
Certified By:
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T617175
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Trace Organics Analysis (Continued)
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 17, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 11 of 14
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Soil Analysis
Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Boron (Hot Water Soluble) MET-93-6104EPA SW 846 6010C; MSA, Part 3, Ch.21
ICP/OES
Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Chromium VI INOR-93-6029 SM 3500 B; MSA Part 3, Ch. 25 SPECTROPHOTOMETER
Cyanide INOR-93-6052MOE CN-3015 & E 3009 A;SM 4500 CN
TECHNICON AUTO ANALYZER
Mercury MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Electrical Conductivity (2:1) INOR-93-6036 McKeague 4.12, SM 2510 B EC METER
Sodium Adsorption Ratio INOR-93-6007McKeague 4.12 & 3.26 & EPA SW-846 6010C
ICP/OES
pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction INOR-93-6031 MSA part 3 & SM 4500-H+ B PH METER
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T617175
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 12 of 14
Trace Organics Analysis
Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Acenaphthylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Acenaphthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Fluorene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Phenanthrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benz(a)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Chrysene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(k)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Moisture Content Org 5506 EPA SW-846 3540 & 8270 BALANCE
Chrysene-d12 ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS
Toluene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS
Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS
Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS
F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method P & T GC/FID
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method P & T GC/FID
F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, EPA SW846 8015
GC / FID
F3 (C16 to C34) VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, EPA SW846 8015
GC / FID
F4 (C34 to C50) VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, EPA SW846 8015
GC / FID
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method BALANCE
Moisture Content VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method BALANCE
Terphenyl VOL-91-5009 GC/FID
F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F3 (C16 to C34) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
F4 (C34 to C50) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS
Moisture Content VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method BALANCE
Terphenyl VOL-91-5009 GC/FID
Dichlorodifluoromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Vinyl Chloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromomethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trichlorofluoromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Acetone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T617175
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 13 of 14
Methylene Chloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl tert-butyl Ether VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl Ethyl Ketone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chloroform VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,1-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Carbon Tetrachloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Benzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichloropropane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromodichloromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,2-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Dibromochloromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Ethylene Dibromide VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Tetrachloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
m & p-Xylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromoform VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Styrene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
o-Xylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,3-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,4-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,3-Dichloropropene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
n-Hexane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene-d8 VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
4-Bromofluorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T617175
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 14 of 14
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.121 GRANTON DRIVE, UNIT #11,RICHMOND HILL, ON L4B3N4 (905) 882-5984
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
Anthony Dapaah, PhD (Chem), Inorganic Lab ManagerSOIL ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED:
PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 5
Jul 20, 2012
VERSION*: 1
Should you require any information regarding this analysis please contact your client services representative at (905) 712-5100
12T620435AGAT WORK ORDER:
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Laboratories (V1) Page 1 of 5
All samples will be disposed of within 30 days following analysis. Please contact the lab if you require additional sample storage time.
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta (APEGGA)Western Enviro-Agricultural Laboratory Association (WEALA)Environmental Services Association of Alberta (ESAA)
Member of:
*NOTES
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
MW12-12 SS10
18' - 20'
MW12-11 SS2 2'
- 4'
MW12-11 SS5 8'
- 10'
BH12-13 SS1 0'
- 2'
BH12-13 SS4 6'
- 8'
MW12-12 SS3 4'
- 6' MW12-L
3516636 3516644 3516646 3516647 3516648Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3516645 3516649
µg/g 0.81.3 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8Antimony
µg/g 118 2 5 5 8 3 4 5Arsenic
µg/g 2220 34 92 69 63 55 60 69Barium
µg/g 0.52.5 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 0.6 <0.5Beryllium
µg/g 536 6 11 14 12 6 7 14Boron
µg/g 0.10 0.40 0.14 0.60 0.26 0.17 0.46 0.54Boron (Hot Water Soluble)
µg/g 0.51.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Cadmium
µg/g 270 9 25 17 23 17 19 18Chromium
µg/g 0.521 3.5 13.7 5.8 15.2 6.6 8.9 5.9Cobalt
µg/g 192 9 26 27 41 23 19 27Copper
µg/g 1120 17 9 34 5 9 12 32Lead
µg/g 0.52 0.5 <0.5 1.2 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.6Molybdenum
µg/g 182 7 27 12 27 15 17 12Nickel
µg/g 0.41.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Selenium
µg/g 0.20.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver
µg/g 0.41 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Thallium
µg/g 0.52.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.9 <0.5 0.6 0.5Uranium
µg/g 186 15 35 27 32 25 27 25Vanadium
µg/g 5290 71 62 91 68 46 54 93Zinc
µg/g 0.20.66 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Chromium VI
µg/g 0.0400.051 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Cyanide
µg/g 0.100.27 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Mercury
mS/cm 0.0050.57 0.833 0.288 0.884 0.224 0.209 0.240 0.244Electrical Conductivity (2:1)
N/A N/A2.4 0.656 0.446 0.292 0.790 0.385 0.132 0.303Sodium Adsorption Ratio
pH Units 9.96 7.73 11.6 8.03 7.61 7.34 11.5pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:
3516636-3516649 EC & SAR were determined on the DI water extract obtained from the 2:1 leaching procedure (2 parts DI water:1 part soil). pH was determined on the 0.01M CaCl2 extract prepared at 2:1 ratio.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Jul 13, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jul 04, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T620435
O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil)
DATE REPORTED: Jul 20, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)
Certified By:Page 2 of 5
3516636 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 0.833MW12-11 SS2 2' - 4'
3516645 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 0.884MW12-12 SS3 4' - 6'
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
Guideline Violation
ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T620435
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
SAMPLEID GUIDELINE ANALYSIS PACKAGE PARAMETER GUIDEVALUE RESULTSAMPLE TITLE
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V1) Page 3 of 5
O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil)
Antimony 1 < 0.8 < 0.8 0.0% < 0.8 117% 70% 130% 80% 80% 120% 82% 70% 130%
Arsenic 1 9 8 11.8% < 1 108% 70% 130% 109% 80% 120% 112% 70% 130%
Barium 1 80 77 3.8% < 2 100% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%
Beryllium 1 0.9 0.9 0.0% < 0.5 106% 70% 130% 92% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%
Boron
1 20 18 10.5% < 5 101% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 104% 70% 130%
Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 1 0.38 0.40 4.1% < 0.10 99% 60% 140% 99% 70% 130% 101% 60% 140%
Cadmium 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 95% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%
Chromium 1 29 27 7.1% < 2 100% 70% 130% 105% 80% 120% 103% 70% 130%
Cobalt 1 16.3 15.8 3.1% < 0.5 97% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%
Copper
1 43 41 4.8% < 1 104% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%
Lead 1 84 69 19.6% < 1 102% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%
Molybdenum 1 0.5 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 102% 70% 130% 102% 80% 120% 113% 70% 130%
Nickel 1 33 32 3.1% < 1 96% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%
Selenium 1 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 101% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%
Silver
1 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 75% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 71% 70% 130%
Thallium 1 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 101% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%
Uranium 1 0.7 0.7 0.0% < 0.5 99% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%
Vanadium 1 37 34 8.5% < 1 102% 70% 130% 104% 80% 120% 103% 70% 130%
Zinc 1 139 139 0.0% < 5 99% 70% 130% 119% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%
Chromium VI
1 3516649 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 100% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 95% 70% 130%
Cyanide 1 < 0.040 < 0.040 0.0% < 0.040 100% 70% 130% 109% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%
Mercury 1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 115% 70% 130% 112% 80% 120% 111% 70% 130%
Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 1 3516636 0.833 0.860 3.2% < 0.005 109% 90% 110% NA NA
Sodium Adsorption Ratio 1 3516636 0.656 0.660 0.7% N/A NA NA NA
pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction
1 3516645 11.6 11.6 0.0% N/A 98% 90% 110% NA NA
Comments: NA signifies Not Applicable.
Certified By:
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T620435
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
Soil Analysis
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 20, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 4 of 5
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Soil Analysis
Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Boron (Hot Water Soluble) MET-93-6104EPA SW 846 6010C; MSA, Part 3, Ch.21
ICP/OES
Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Chromium VI INOR-93-6029 SM 3500 B; MSA Part 3, Ch. 25 SPECTROPHOTOMETER
Cyanide INOR-93-6052MOE CN-3015 & E 3009 A;SM 4500 CN
TECHNICON AUTO ANALYZER
Mercury MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS
Electrical Conductivity (2:1) INOR-93-6036 McKeague 4.12, SM 2510 B EC METER
Sodium Adsorption Ratio INOR-93-6007McKeague 4.12 & 3.26 & EPA SW-846 6010C
ICP/OES
pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction INOR-93-6031 MSA part 3 & SM 4500-H+ B PH METER
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T620435
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500-005
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 5 of 5
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.121 GRANTON DRIVE, UNIT #11,RICHMOND HILL, ON L4B3N4 (905) 882-5984
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
Inga Kuzmina, Organic Laboratory SupervisorTRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:
Elizabeth Polakowska, MSc (Animal Sci), PhD (Agri Sci), Inorganic Lab Supervisor
WATER ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:
DATE REPORTED:
PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 24
Aug 17, 2012
VERSION*: 2
Should you require any information regarding this analysis please contact your client services representative at (905) 712-5100
12T628081AGAT WORK ORDER:
ATTENTION TO: Ilir Liko
PROJECT NO: 350500
Laboratories (V2) Page 1 of 24
All samples will be disposed of within 30 days following analysis. Please contact the lab if you require additional sample storage time.
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta (APEGGA)Western Enviro-Agricultural Laboratory Association (WEALA)Environmental Services Association of Alberta (ESAA)
Member of:
VERSION 2:CCME F3 value corrected on sample MW12-1.
*NOTES
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
MW12-1 MW12-10MW12-6 MW12-8 MW12-4 MW12-5MW12-9 MW12-7
3589313 3589381 3589603 3589635 3589671 3589702Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589395 3589688
µg/L 0.201400 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.32 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Naphthalene <0.20
µg/L 0.201.4 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Acenaphthylene <0.20
µg/L 0.20600 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Acenaphthene 0.64
µg/L 0.20290 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.22 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Fluorene <0.20
µg/L 0.10380 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.30 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Phenanthrene <0.10
µg/L 0.101 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Anthracene <0.10
µg/L 0.2073 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Fluoranthene <0.20
µg/L 0.205.7 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Pyrene <0.20
µg/L 0.201.8 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Benz(a)anthracene <0.20
µg/L 0.100.7 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Chrysene <0.10
µg/L 0.100.75 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Benzo(b)fluoranthene <0.10
µg/L 0.100.4 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Benzo(k)fluoranthene <0.10
µg/L 0.010.81 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo(a)pyrene <0.01
µg/L 0.200.2 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene <0.20
µg/L 0.200.4 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.20
µg/L 0.200.2 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.20
µg/L 0.201500 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.79 <0.20 <0.20 <0.202-and 1-methyl Naphthalene <0.20
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 84 81 90 85 90 80 64Chrysene-d12 8650-140
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Aug 01, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Water)
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 2 of 24
MW12-D MW12-2
3589717 3589733Parameter G / S RDLUnit
µg/L 0.201400 <0.20 <0.20Naphthalene
µg/L 0.201.4 <0.20 <0.20Acenaphthylene
µg/L 0.20600 <0.20 <0.20Acenaphthene
µg/L 0.20290 <0.20 <0.20Fluorene
µg/L 0.10380 <0.10 <0.10Phenanthrene
µg/L 0.101 <0.10 <0.10Anthracene
µg/L 0.2073 <0.20 <0.20Fluoranthene
µg/L 0.205.7 <0.20 <0.20Pyrene
µg/L 0.201.8 <0.20 <0.20Benz(a)anthracene
µg/L 0.100.7 <0.10 <0.10Chrysene
µg/L 0.100.75 <0.10 <0.10Benzo(b)fluoranthene
µg/L 0.100.4 <0.10 <0.10Benzo(k)fluoranthene
µg/L 0.010.81 <0.01 <0.01Benzo(a)pyrene
µg/L 0.200.2 <0.20 <0.20Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
µg/L 0.200.4 <0.20 <0.20Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
µg/L 0.200.2 <0.20 <0.20Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
µg/L 0.201500 <0.20 <0.202-and 1-methyl Naphthalene
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 91 75Chrysene-d12 50-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T9 (ALL-GW) - NEWComments:
3589313-3589733 Note: The result for Benzo(b)Flouranthene is the total of the Benzo(b)&(j)Flouranthene isomers because the isomers co-elute on the GC column.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Aug 01, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Water)
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 3 of 24
MW12-16MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-PMW12-14
3589409 3589422 3589459 3589476Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589436
µg/L 0.201400 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Naphthalene
µg/L 0.201.8 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Acenaphthylene
µg/L 0.20600 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Acenaphthene
µg/L 0.20400 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Fluorene
µg/L 0.10580 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Phenanthrene
µg/L 0.102.4 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Anthracene
µg/L 0.20130 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Fluoranthene
µg/L 0.2068 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Pyrene
µg/L 0.204.7 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Benz(a)anthracene
µg/L 0.101 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Chrysene
µg/L 0.100.75 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Benzo(b)fluoranthene
µg/L 0.100.4 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Benzo(k)fluoranthene
µg/L 0.010.81 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo(a)pyrene
µg/L 0.200.2 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
µg/L 0.200.52 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
µg/L 0.200.2 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
µg/L 0.201800 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.202-and 1-methyl Naphthalene
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 86 89 86 77 90Chrysene-d12 50-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T3(NPGW) - CurrentComments:
3589409-3589476 Note: The result for Benzo(b)Flouranthene is the total of the Benzo(b)&(j)Flouranthene isomers because the isomers co-elute on the GC column.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Aug 01, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Water).
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 4 of 24
MW12-1 MW12-10MW12-6 MW12-8 MW12-4 MW12-5MW12-9 MW12-7
3589313 3589381 3589603 3589635 3589671 3589702Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589395 3589688
µg/L 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25F1 (C6 to C10) <25
µg/L 25420 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX <25
µg/L 100150 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F2 (C10 to C16) <100
µg/L 100NV <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene <100
µg/L 100500 <100 <100 <100 530 <100 <100 <100F3 (C16 to C34) <100
µg/L 100500 <100 <100 <100 530 <100 <100 <100F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs <100
µg/L 100500 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F4 (C34 to C50) <100
µg/L 500500 NA NA NA NA NA NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons NA
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 116 125 88 82 68 67 84Terphenyl 10360-140
MW12-D MW12-2
3589717 3589733Parameter G / S RDLUnit
µg/L 25 <25 <25F1 (C6 to C10)
µg/L 25420 <25 <25F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX
µg/L 100150 <100 <100F2 (C10 to C16)
µg/L 100NV <100 <100F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene
µg/L 100500 <100 <100F3 (C16 to C34)
µg/L 100500 <100 <100F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs
µg/L 100500 <100 <100F4 (C34 to C50)
µg/L 500500 NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 96 88Terphenyl 60-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T9 (ALL-GW) - NEWComments:
3589313-3589733 The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using Toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and nC34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16 - C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 Hydrocarbons indicated that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6-C50 results are corrected for BTEX and PAH contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Aug 01, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water)
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 5 of 24
MW12-16MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-PMW12-14
3589409 3589422 3589459 3589476Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589436
µg/L 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25F1 (C6 to C10)
µg/L 25750 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX
µg/L 100150 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F2 (C10 to C16)
µg/L 100150 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene
µg/L 100500 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F3 (C16 to C34)
µg/L 100500 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs
µg/L 100500 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F4 (C34 to C50)
µg/L 500500 NA NA NA NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% 117 124 133 130 91Terphenyl 60-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T3(NPGW) - CurrentComments:
3589409-3589476 The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using Toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and nC34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16 - C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 Hydrocarbons indicated that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6-C50 results are corrected for BTEX and PAH contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Aug 01, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water).
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 6 of 24
Trip Blank MW12-5MW12-6 MW12-8 MW12-1 MW12-4MW12-9
3589313 3589381 3589495 3589603 3589635 3589671Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589395 RDL
µg/L 0.203500 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.40
µg/L 0.170.5 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 0.34Vinyl Chloride <0.34
µg/L 0.205.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Bromomethane <0.40
µg/L 0.402000 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 0.80Trichlorofluoromethane <0.80
µg/L 1.0100000 340 120 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0Acetone 690
µg/L 0.301.6 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.601,1-Dichloroethylene <0.60
µg/L 0.30610 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.60Methylene Chloride <0.60
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene <0.40
µg/L 0.20190 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.40
µg/L 0.30320 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.601,1-Dichloroethane <0.60
µg/L 1.0470000 26 4.9 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0Methyl Ethyl Ketone 27
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene <0.40
µg/L 0.202.4 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Chloroform <0.40
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.401,2-Dichloroethane <0.40
µg/L 0.30640 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.601,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.60
µg/L 0.200.79 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Carbon Tetrachloride <0.40
µg/L 0.2044 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.34 <0.20 0.40Benzene <0.40
µg/L 0.2016 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.401,2-Dichloropropane <0.40
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Trichloroethylene <0.40
µg/L 0.2067000 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Bromodichloromethane <0.40
µg/L 1.0140000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0Methyl Isobutyl Ketone <2.0
µg/L 0.204.7 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.401,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.40
µg/L 0.2014000 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.26 <0.20 0.40Toluene <0.40
µg/L 0.1065000 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20Dibromochloromethane <0.20
µg/L 0.100.25 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20Ethylene Dibromide <0.20
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Tetrachloroethylene <0.40
µg/L 0.103.3 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.201,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.20
µg/L 0.10500 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20Chlorobenzene <0.20
µg/L 0.101800 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.11 <0.10 0.20Ethylbenzene <0.20
µg/L 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40m & p-Xylene <0.40
µg/L 0.10380 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20Bromoform <0.20
µg/L 0.101300 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20Styrene <0.20
µg/L 0.103.2 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.201,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.20
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jul 30, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Water)
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 7 of 24
Trip Blank MW12-5MW12-6 MW12-8 MW12-1 MW12-4MW12-9
3589313 3589381 3589495 3589603 3589635 3589671Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589395 RDL
µg/L 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20o-Xylene <0.20
µg/L 0.107600 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.201,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.20
µg/L 0.108 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.201,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.20
µg/L 0.104600 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.201,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.20
µg/L 0.305.2 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.601,3-Dichloropropene <0.60
µg/L 0.203300 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Xylene Mixture <0.40
µg/L 0.2051 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40n-Hexane <0.40
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% Recovery 97 96 104 97 98 105Toluene-d8 10250-140
% Recovery 94 95 89 89 104 904-Bromofluorobenzene 8950-140
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jul 30, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Water)
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 8 of 24
MW12-7 MW12-10 MW12-2MW12-D
3589688 3589702 RDL 3589733Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589717
µg/L 0.203500 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Dichlorodifluoromethane
µg/L 0.170.5 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 0.34 <0.34Vinyl Chloride
µg/L 0.205.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Bromomethane
µg/L 0.402000 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 0.80 <0.80Trichlorofluoromethane
µg/L 1.0100000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0 <2.0Acetone
µg/L 0.301.6 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.60 <0.601,1-Dichloroethylene
µg/L 0.30610 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.60 <0.60Methylene Chloride
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
µg/L 0.20190 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Methyl tert-butyl ether
µg/L 0.30320 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.60 <0.601,1-Dichloroethane
µg/L 1.0470000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0 <2.0Methyl Ethyl Ketone
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
µg/L 0.202.4 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Chloroform
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.401,2-Dichloroethane
µg/L 0.30640 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.60 <0.601,1,1-Trichloroethane
µg/L 0.200.79 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Carbon Tetrachloride
µg/L 0.2044 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Benzene
µg/L 0.2016 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.401,2-Dichloropropane
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Trichloroethylene
µg/L 0.2067000 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Bromodichloromethane
µg/L 1.0140000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0 <2.0Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
µg/L 0.204.7 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.401,1,2-Trichloroethane
µg/L 0.2014000 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Toluene
µg/L 0.1065000 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.20Dibromochloromethane
µg/L 0.100.25 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.20Ethylene Dibromide
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Tetrachloroethylene
µg/L 0.103.3 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.201,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
µg/L 0.10500 <0.10 2.2 <0.10 0.20 <0.20Chlorobenzene
µg/L 0.101800 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.20Ethylbenzene
µg/L 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40m & p-Xylene
µg/L 0.10380 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.20Bromoform
µg/L 0.101300 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.20Styrene
µg/L 0.103.2 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.201,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jul 30, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Water)
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 9 of 24
MW12-7 MW12-10 MW12-2MW12-D
3589688 3589702 RDL 3589733Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589717
µg/L 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.20o-Xylene
µg/L 0.107600 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.201,3-Dichlorobenzene
µg/L 0.108 <0.10 0.34 <0.10 0.20 <0.201,4-Dichlorobenzene
µg/L 0.104600 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.201,2-Dichlorobenzene
µg/L 0.305.2 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.60 <0.601,3-Dichloropropene
µg/L 0.203300 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Xylene Mixture
µg/L 0.2051 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40n-Hexane
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% Recovery 101 99 102 101Toluene-d8 50-140
% Recovery 88 94 98 884-Bromofluorobenzene 50-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T9 (ALL-GW) - NEWComments:
3589381 Dilution factor=2The sample was diluted because it was foamy and cloudy. The reporting detection limit has been corrected for the dilution factor used.
3589671 Dilution factor=2The sample was diluted because it was foamy. The reporting detection limit has been corrected for the dilution factor used.
3589733 Dilution factor=2The sample was diluted because it was oily and cloudy. The reporting detection limit has been corrected for the dilution factor used.
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jul 30, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Water)
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 10 of 24
MW12-16MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-PMW12-14
3589409 3589422 3589459 3589476Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589436
µg/L 0.204400 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Dichlorodifluoromethane
µg/L 0.170.5 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17Vinyl Chloride
µg/L 0.205.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Bromomethane
µg/L 0.402500 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40Trichlorofluoromethane
µg/L 1.0130000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Acetone
µg/L 0.301.6 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.301,1-Dichloroethylene
µg/L 0.30610 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30Methylene Chloride
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
µg/L 0.20190 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Methyl tert-butyl ether
µg/L 0.30320 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.301,1-Dichloroethane
µg/L 1.0470000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Methyl Ethyl Ketone
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
µg/L 0.202.4 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Chloroform
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.201,2-Dichloroethane
µg/L 0.30640 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.301,1,1-Trichloroethane
µg/L 0.200.79 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Carbon Tetrachloride
µg/L 0.2044 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Benzene
µg/L 0.2016 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.201,2-Dichloropropane
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Trichloroethylene
µg/L 0.2085000 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Bromodichloromethane
µg/L 1.0140000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
µg/L 0.204.7 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.201,1,2-Trichloroethane
µg/L 0.2018000 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Toluene
µg/L 0.1082000 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Dibromochloromethane
µg/L 0.100.25 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Ethylene Dibromide
µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Tetrachloroethylene
µg/L 0.103.3 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.101,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
µg/L 0.10630 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Chlorobenzene
µg/L 0.102300 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Ethylbenzene
µg/L 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20m & p-Xylene
µg/L 0.10380 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Bromoform
µg/L 0.101300 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Styrene
µg/L 0.103.2 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.101,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Aug 01, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Water).
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 11 of 24
MW12-16MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-PMW12-14
3589409 3589422 3589459 3589476Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589436
µg/L 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10o-Xylene
µg/L 0.109600 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.101,3-Dichlorobenzene
µg/L 0.108 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.101,4-Dichlorobenzene
µg/L 0.104600 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.101,2-Dichlorobenzene
µg/L 0.305.2 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.301,3-Dichloropropene
µg/L 0.204200 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Xylene Mixture
µg/L 0.2051 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20n-Hexane
Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit
% Recovery 105 102 97 99 100Toluene-d8 50-140
% Recovery 90 90 94 90 924-Bromofluorobenzene 50-140
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T3(NPGW) - CurrentComments:
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Aug 01, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Water).
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 12 of 24
MW12-1 MW12-10MW12-6 MW12-8 MW12-4 MW12-5MW12-9 MW12-7
3589313 3589381 3589603 3589635 3589671 3589702Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589395 3589688
µg/L 0.516000 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.6 <0.5 0.9 0.8Antimony 0.9
µg/L 1.01500 6.0 7.9 4.0 33.4 2.8 6.4 5.7Arsenic 3.9
µg/L 2.023000 88.3 92.9 109 202 359 115 126Barium 699
µg/L 0.553 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Beryllium <0.5
µg/L 10.036000 89.6 95.1 64.8 596 438 450 777Boron 477
µg/L 0.22.1 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Cadmium <0.2
µg/L 2.0640 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 5.3 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0Chromium <2.0
µg/L 0.552 19.4 5.2 <0.5 20.8 7.3 44.6 9.1Cobalt 0.9
µg/L 1.069 1.5 1.6 <1.0 1.9 1.6 2.1 1.3Copper 1.2
µg/L 0.520 <0.5 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Lead <0.5
µg/L 0.57300 4.9 4.5 4.3 55.1 1.1 8.2 2.3Molybdenum 0.8
µg/L 1.0390 29.8 10.0 <1.0 27.2 13.6 46.7 14.2Nickel 1.3
µg/L 1.050 1.2 <1.0 <1.0 3.3 2.1 <1.0 <1.0Selenium <1.0
µg/L 0.21.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver <0.2
µg/L 0.3400 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3Thallium <0.3
µg/L 0.5330 16.5 3.6 0.7 6.5 0.5 28.2 2.7Uranium <0.5
µg/L 0.4200 1.7 1.8 2.0 4.8 2.6 3.1 3.4Vanadium 3.2
µg/L 5.0890 17.1 37.7 36.7 52.1 32.9 42.7 19.2Zinc 68.2
µg/L 0.020.29 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Mercury <0.02
µg/L 5110 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5Chromium VI <5
µg/L 252 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2Cyanide <2
µg/L 5001800000 29400 81000 83300 231000 217000 48400 153000Sodium 154000
µg/L 1001800000 63000 168000 87200 176000 257000 157000 374000Chloride 410000
µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 401Nitrate as N <50
µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50Nitrite as N <50
uS/cm 2 1300 972 717 2660 2140 1960 1920Electrical Conductivity 1960
pH Units NA 7.82 7.93 7.88 8.11 8.09 8.05 7.99pH 7.86
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Aug 01, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Water)
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 13 of 24
MW12-D MW12-2
3589717 3589733Parameter G / S RDLUnit
µg/L 0.516000 <0.5 <0.5Antimony
µg/L 1.01500 3.0 16.5Arsenic
µg/L 2.023000 486 251Barium
µg/L 0.553 <0.5 <0.5Beryllium
µg/L 10.036000 472 947Boron
µg/L 0.22.1 <0.2 <0.2Cadmium
µg/L 2.0640 <2.0 3.9Chromium
µg/L 0.552 7.8 24.7Cobalt
µg/L 1.069 1.7 1.9Copper
µg/L 0.520 <0.5 <0.5Lead
µg/L 0.57300 1.0 37.5Molybdenum
µg/L 1.0390 17.0 32.7Nickel
µg/L 1.050 1.5 3.1Selenium
µg/L 0.21.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver
µg/L 0.3400 <0.3 <0.3Thallium
µg/L 0.5330 0.6 16.1Uranium
µg/L 0.4200 3.7 3.7Vanadium
µg/L 5.0890 55.7 <5.0Zinc
µg/L 0.020.29 <0.02 <0.02Mercury
µg/L 5110 <5 <5Chromium VI
µg/L 252 <2 <2Cyanide
µg/L 5001800000 223000 172000Sodium
µg/L 1001800000 257000 223000Chloride
µg/L 50 <50 <50Nitrate as N
µg/L 50 <50 <50Nitrite as N
uS/cm 2 2150 2670Electrical Conductivity
pH Units NA 8.13 8.12pH
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T9 (ALL-GW) - NEWComments:
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Aug 01, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Water)
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 14 of 24
MW12-16MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-PMW12-14
3589409 3589422 3589459 3589476Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589436
µg/L 0.520000 0.6 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5Antimony
µg/L 1.01900 2.8 1.1 1.4 <1.0 1.0Arsenic
µg/L 2.029000 66.5 29.2 104 63.0 68.5Barium
µg/L 0.567 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Beryllium
µg/L 10.045000 37.7 55.8 255 32.7 30.8Boron
µg/L 0.22.7 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Cadmium
µg/L 2.0810 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0Chromium
µg/L 0.566 6.3 3.2 8.2 0.8 0.8Cobalt
µg/L 1.087 2.3 <1.0 5.1 1.4 1.2Copper
µg/L 0.525 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Lead
µg/L 0.59200 2.9 1.7 3.2 0.8 0.8Molybdenum
µg/L 1.0490 8.6 3.9 17.8 2.5 2.0Nickel
µg/L 1.063 1.4 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Selenium
µg/L 0.21.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver
µg/L 0.3510 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3Thallium
µg/L 0.5420 5.3 1.8 17.8 2.9 3.1Uranium
µg/L 0.4250 2.2 1.0 1.5 1.6 1.8Vanadium
µg/L 5.01100 44.8 <5.0 38.2 <5.0 <5.0Zinc
µg/L 0.020.29 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Mercury
µg/L 5140 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5Chromium VI
µg/L 266 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2Cyanide
µg/L 5002300000 25000 23600 45100 51000 16300Sodium
µg/L 1002300000 233000 80600 119000 92200 20400Chloride
µg/L 50 <50 <50 2440 1090 1160Nitrate as N
µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50Nitrite as N
uS/cm 2 1430 1430 1550 951 732Electrical Conductivity
pH Units NA 7.98 7.95 8.00 8.10 8.11pH
RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T3(NPGW) - CurrentComments:
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Aug 01, 2012
Certificate of Analysis
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Water).
DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water
PROJECT NO: 350500
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V2)
Certified By:Page 15 of 24
3589603 T9 (ALL-GW) - NEW O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water) F3 (C16 to C34) 500 530MW12-1
3589603 T9 (ALL-GW) - NEW O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water) F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs 500 530MW12-1
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
Guideline Violation
ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
PROJECT NO: 350500
SAMPLEID GUIDELINE ANALYSIS PACKAGE PARAMETER GUIDEVALUE RESULTSAMPLE TITLE
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V2) Page 16 of 24
O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water)
F1 (C6 to C10) 1 3589409 < 25 < 25 0.0% < 25 90% 60% 140% 80% 60% 140% 71% 60% 140%
F2 (C10 to C16) 1 <100 <100 0.0% < 100 100% 60% 140% 81% 60% 140% 65% 60% 140%
F3 (C16 to C34) 1 <100 <100 0.0% < 100 100% 60% 140% 76% 60% 140% 74% 60% 140%
F4 (C34 to C50) 1 <100 <100 0.0% < 100 97% 60% 140% 108% 60% 140% 86% 60% 140%
O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Water)
Naphthalene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 92% 50% 140% 68% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140%
Acenaphthylene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 100% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140%
Acenaphthene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 99% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140%
Fluorene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 100% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%
Phenanthrene
1 3589671 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 97% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%
Anthracene 1 3589671 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 101% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140%
Fluoranthene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 101% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140% 100% 50% 140%
Pyrene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 102% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140% 98% 50% 140%
Benz(a)anthracene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 96% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 93% 50% 140%
Chrysene
1 3589671 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 104% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 3589671 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 93% 50% 140% 93% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140%
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 3589671 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 103% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140%
Benzo(a)pyrene 1 3589671 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.0% < 0.01 93% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140%
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 89% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140% 95% 50% 140%
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 92% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 95% 50% 140%
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 91% 50% 140% 89% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140%
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 93% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%
O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Water)
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 103% 50% 140% 87% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140%
Vinyl Chloride 1 3589422 < 0.17 < 0.17 0.0% < 0.17 116% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140% 95% 50% 140%
Bromomethane 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 110% 50% 140% 86% 50% 140% 89% 50% 140%
Trichlorofluoromethane 1 3589422 < 0.40 < 0.40 0.0% < 0.40 105% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140%
Acetone
1 3589422 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 114% 50% 140% 89% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140%
1,1-Dichloroethylene 1 3589422 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 120% 50% 140% 89% 60% 130% 92% 50% 140%
Methylene Chloride 1 3589422 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 110% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 111% 50% 140% 85% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%
Methyl tert-butyl ether 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 88% 50% 140% 85% 60% 130% 71% 50% 140%
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 3589422 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 115% 50% 140% 83% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%
Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1 3589422 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 81% 50% 140% 87% 50% 140% 100% 50% 140%
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 118% 50% 140% 86% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%
Chloroform 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 114% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 90% 50% 140%
1,2-Dichloroethane 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 117% 50% 140% 87% 60% 130% 91% 50% 140%
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 3589422 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 98% 50% 140% 73% 60% 130% 71% 50% 140%
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Ilir Liko
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500
Trace Organics Analysis
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Aug 17, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V2) Page 17 of 24
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 112% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 92% 50% 140%
Benzene 1 3589422 0.77 1.0 26.0% < 0.20 110% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 90% 50% 140%
1,2-Dichloropropane 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 106% 50% 140% 81% 60% 130% 81% 50% 140%
Trichloroethylene 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 109% 50% 140% 93% 60% 130% 93% 50% 140%
Bromodichloromethane
1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 118% 50% 140% 84% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 1 3589422 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 82% 50% 140% 113% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140%
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 117% 50% 140% 84% 60% 130% 84% 50% 140%
Toluene 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 107% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 90% 50% 140%
Dibromochloromethane 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 110% 50% 140% 80% 60% 130% 80% 50% 140%
Ethylene Dibromide
1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 106% 50% 140% 75% 60% 130% 81% 50% 140%
Tetrachloroethylene 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 109% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 92% 50% 140%
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 NA 50% 140% 78% 60% 130% 76% 50% 140%
Chlorobenzene 1 3589422 2.6 3.1 17.5% < 0.10 119% 50% 140% 87% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%
Ethylbenzene 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 113% 50% 140% 89% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%
m & p-Xylene
1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 124% 50% 140% 89% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%
Bromoform 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 99% 50% 140% 72% 60% 130% 72% 50% 140%
Styrene 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 95% 50% 140% 75% 60% 130% 72% 50% 140%
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 NA 50% 140% 75% 60% 130% 78% 50% 140%
o-Xylene 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 110% 50% 140% 87% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 106% 50% 140% 80% 60% 130% 76% 50% 140%
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 108% 50% 140% 81% 60% 130% 80% 50% 140%
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 102% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 75% 50% 140%
1,3-Dichloropropene 1 3589422 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 95% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%
Xylene Mixture 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 110% 50% 140% 87% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%
n-Hexane
1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 NA 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%
Certified By:
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Ilir Liko
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500
Trace Organics Analysis (Continued)
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Aug 17, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V2) Page 18 of 24
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Water)
Antimony 1 3589476 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 105% 70% 130% 82% 80% 120% 74% 70% 130%
Arsenic 1 3589476 1.0 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 103% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 115% 70% 130%
Barium 1 3589476 68.5 65.2 4.9% < 2.0 106% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 105% 70% 130%
Beryllium 1 3589476 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 92% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 96% 70% 130%
Boron
1 3589476 30.8 27.1 12.8% < 10.0 107% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 113% 70% 130%
Cadmium 1 3589476 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 99% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%
Chromium 1 3589476 < 2.0 < 2.0 0.0% < 2.0 103% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 115% 70% 130%
Cobalt 1 3589476 0.8 0.8 0.0% < 0.5 101% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%
Copper 1 3589476 1.2 1.1 8.7% < 1.0 99% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%
Lead
1 3589476 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 96% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 97% 70% 130%
Molybdenum 1 3589476 0.8 0.7 13.3% < 0.5 105% 70% 130% 108% 80% 120% 97% 70% 130%
Nickel 1 3589476 2.0 2.2 9.5% < 1.0 100% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%
Selenium 1 3589476 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 105% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 119% 70% 130%
Silver 1 3589476 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 106% 70% 130% 108% 80% 120% 115% 70% 130%
Thallium
1 3589476 < 0.3 < 0.3 0.0% < 0.3 97% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%
Uranium 1 3589476 3.1 2.9 6.7% < 0.5 95% 70% 130% 105% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%
Vanadium 1 3589476 1.8 1.8 0.0% < 0.4 97% 70% 130% 93% 80% 120% 102% 70% 130%
Zinc 1 3589476 < 5.0 < 5.0 0.0% < 5.0 101% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 107% 70% 130%
Mercury 1 3589313 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 105% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%
Chromium VI
1 3589313 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 101% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%
Cyanide 1 3589381 < 2 < 2 0.0% < 2 106% 70% 130% 110% 80% 120% 85% 70% 130%
Sodium 1 3589395 83300 84100 1.0% < 500 95% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%
Chloride 1 3589381 168000 166000 1.2% < 100 91% 70% 130% 92% 70% 130% 95% 70% 130%
Nitrate as N 1 3589381 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 96% 70% 130% 96% 70% 130% 96% 70% 130%
Nitrite as N
1 3589381 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 NA 70% 130% 90% 70% 130% 105% 70% 130%
Electrical Conductivity 1 3589603 2660 2670 0.4% < 2 108% 90% 110% NA NA
pH 1 3589603 8.11 8.11 0.0% NA 100% 90% 110% NA NA
Comments: NA - Not Applicable.
Certified By:
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
Dup #1 RPDMeasured
ValueRecovery Recovery
Quality Assurance
ATTENTION TO: Ilir Liko
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500
Water Analysis
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
BatchPARAMETERSample
IdDup #2
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
UpperLower
AcceptableLimits
MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Aug 17, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL
MethodBlank
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V2) Page 19 of 24
AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.
Trace Organics Analysis
Naphthalene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Acenaphthylene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Acenaphthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Fluorene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Phenanthrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Benz(a)anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Chrysene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(k)fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Chrysene-d12 ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Naphthalene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Acenaphthylene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Acenaphthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Fluorene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Phenanthrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Benz(a)anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Chrysene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(k)fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
Chrysene-d12 ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS
F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID
F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID
F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID
F3 (C16 to C34) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID
F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID
F4 (C34 to C50) VOL -91- 5010 MOE PHC- E3421 GC/FID
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 BALANCE
Terphenyl VOL-91-5010 GC/FID
F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID
F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID
F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID
F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Ilir Liko
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V2) Page 20 of 24
F3 (C16 to C34) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID
F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID
F4 (C34 to C50) VOL -91- 5010 MOE PHC- E3421 GC/FID
Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 BALANCE
Terphenyl VOL-91-5010 GC/FID
Dichlorodifluoromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Vinyl Chloride VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromomethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trichlorofluoromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Acetone VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methylene Chloride VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl tert-butyl ether VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl Ethyl Ketone VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chloroform VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,1-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Carbon Tetrachloride VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Benzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichloropropane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromodichloromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,2-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Dibromochloromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Ethylene Dibromide VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Tetrachloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
m & p-Xylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromoform VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Styrene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
o-Xylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,3-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,4-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,3-Dichloropropene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
n-Hexane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene-d8 VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
4-Bromofluorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Dichlorodifluoromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Vinyl Chloride VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromomethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Ilir Liko
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V2) Page 21 of 24
Trichlorofluoromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Acetone VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methylene Chloride VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl tert-butyl ether VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl Ethyl Ketone VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chloroform VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,1-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Carbon Tetrachloride VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Benzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichloropropane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Trichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromodichloromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,2-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Dibromochloromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Ethylene Dibromide VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Tetrachloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Chlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
m & p-Xylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Bromoform VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Styrene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
o-Xylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,3-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,4-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,2-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
1,3-Dichloropropene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
n-Hexane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Toluene-d8 VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
4-Bromofluorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Ilir Liko
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V2) Page 22 of 24
Water Analysis
Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Mercury MET-93-6100 EPA SW-846 7470 & 245.1 CVAAS
Chromium VI INOR-93-6034 SM 3500-Cr B SPECTROPHOTOMETER
Cyanide INOR-93-6052MOE METHOD CN- 3015 & SM 4500 CN- I
TECHNICON AUTO ANALYZER
Sodium MET-93-6105 EPA SW-846 6010C & 200.7 ICP/OES
Chloride INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH
Nitrate as N INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH
Nitrite as N INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH
Electrical Conductivity INOR-93-6000 SM 2510 B PC TITRATE
pH INOR-93-6000 SM 4500-H+ B PC TITRATE
Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS
Mercury MET-93-6100 EPA SW-846 7470 & 245.1 CVAAS
Chromium VI INOR-93-6034 SM 3500-Cr B SPECTROPHOTOMETER
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Ilir Liko
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V2) Page 23 of 24
Cyanide INOR-93-6052MOE METHOD CN- 3015 & SM 4500 CN- I
TECHNICON AUTO ANALYZER
Sodium MET-93-6105 EPA SW-846 6010C & 200.7 ICP/OES
Chloride INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH
Nitrate as N INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH
Nitrite as N INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH
Electrical Conductivity INOR-93-6000 SM 2510 B PC TITRATE
pH INOR-93-6000 SM 4500-H+ B PC TITRATE
Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested
AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T628081
Method Summary
ATTENTION TO: Ilir Liko
CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.
PROJECT NO: 350500
AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER
5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO
CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122
http://www.agatlabs.com
METHOD SUMMARY (V2) Page 24 of 24
BH12-13
MW12-1
MW12-2
MW12-3
MW12-4
MW12-5
MW12-6
MW12-7
MW12-8
MW12-9
MW12-10
MW12-14
MW12-16
MW12-11
MW12-12
BH12-15
LAKEVIEW WATERFRONT
CONNECTION EA
BOREHOLE AND MONITORING WELL
LOCATION PLAN
SEPT. 2012 1:4000± 350500-1
P.A.L. M.W. 350500
Drawn By:
Date:
Scale:
NOTES:
REVISIONS:
No. Date: By: Revisions
APPROX. SCALE 1:4000±
00 100 150 metres
REFERENCE:
LEGEND:
BOREHOLE LOCATION (DCS, 2012)
MONITORING WELL LOCATION (DCS , 2012)
Approved By:
Drawing No:
Project No:
SUPPLEMENTARY ENVIRONMENTAL
INVESTIGATION
50
LAKE LEVEL ELEVATION MEASURING POINT
BH12-13
MW12-1
MW12-2
MW12-3
MW12-4
MW12-5
MW12-6
MW12-7
MW12-8
MW12-9
MW12-10
MW12-14
MW12-16
MW12-11
MW12-12
BH12-15
LAKEVIEW WATERFRONT
CONNECTION EA
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR AND
ELEVATION PLAN
SEPT. 2013 1:4000± 350500-2
P.A.L. M.W. 350500
Drawn By:
Date:
Scale:
NOTES:
REVISIONS:
No. Date: By: Revisions
metres
REFERENCE:
LEGEND:
BOREHOLE LOCATION (DCS, 2012)
MONITORING WELL LOCATION (DCS , 2012)
Approved By:
Drawing No:
Project No:
SUPPLEMENTARY ENVIRONMENTAL
INVESTIGATION
00 100 150
APPROX. SCALE 1:4000±
50
LAKE LEVEL ELEVATION m (DCS) 2012
GROUNDWATER CONTOURS (Aug 2013)
GROUNDWATER ELEVTIONS in m (Aug 2013)
LAKE LEVEL ELEVATION MEASURING POINT
BH12-13
MW12-1
MW12-2
MW12-3
MW12-4
MW12-5
MW12-6
MW12-7
MW12-8
MW12-9
MW12-10
MW12-14
MW12-16
MW12-11
MW12-12
BH12-15
LAKEVIEW WATERFRONT
CONNECTION EA
SOIL CONTAMINATION DISTRIBUTION
SEPT. 2013 1:4000± 350500-3
P.A.L. M.W. 350500
Drawn By:
Date:
Scale:
REVISIONS:
No. Date: By: Revisions
metres
REFERENCE:
LEGEND:
BOREHOLE LOCATION (DCS, 2012)
MONITORING WELL LOCATION (DCS , 2012)
Approved By:
Drawing No:
Project No:
SUPPLEMENTARY ENVIRONMENTAL
INVESTIGATION
00 100 150
APPROX. SCALE 1:4000±
50
All parameter values in µg/g unless otherwise indicated
Table 3 Table 3 Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards
for Use in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition
Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and
Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the
EPA, April, 2011
Table 9 Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards for Use
within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable
Groundwater Condition Province of Ontario Soil,
Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
M Meets applicable MOE standards
NOTES:
BH12-13
MW12-1
MW12-2
MW12-3
MW12-4
MW12-5
MW12-6
MW12-7
MW12-8
MW12-9
MW12-10
MW12-14
MW12-16
MW12-11
MW12-12
BH12-15
LAKEVIEW WATERFRONT
CONNECTION EA
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
DISTRIBUTION
SEPT. 2013 1:4000± 350500-4
P.A.L. M.W. 350500
Drawn By:
Date:
Scale:
NOTES:
REVISIONS:
No. Date: By: Revisions
metres
REFERENCE:
LEGEND:
BOREHOLE LOCATION (DCS, 2012)
MONITORING WELL LOCATION (DCS , 2012)
Approved By:
Drawing No:
Project No:
SUPPLEMENTARY ENVIRONMENTAL
INVESTIGATION
00 100 150
APPROX. SCALE 1:4000±
50
All parameter values in µg/L unless otherwise indicated
Table 9 Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards for Use
within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable
Groundwater Condition Province of Ontario Soil,
Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use
Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011
M Meets applicable MOE standards