Steel Structures 8 (2008) 277-284 www.ijoss.org
Analysis of Local Vibrations in the Stay Cables of the
Hizen-Takashima Bridge
Kensuke Tanaka1, Kazuo Takahashi2,*, and Shozo Nakamura2
1Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nagasaki University, 1-14, Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan2Department of Civil Engineering, Nagasaki University, 1-14, Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan
Abstract
Local parametric vibrations of the stay cables of the Hizen-Takashima Bridge, which is currently under construction, arestudied. This bridge is a composite cable-stayed bridge with a steel girder and concrete towers. The natural frequencies of theglobal vibration modes are obtained using a three-dimensional FEM model. Relations between global natural frequencies andthe local natural frequencies of the stay cables are first demonstrated and the results are compared with other cable-stayedbridges. The local vibrations of the stay cables at the support during global motion are obtained and the properties of the localvibrations are discussed.
Keywords: cable-stated bridge, stay cable, local vibration, cable vibration
1. Introduction
Previous studies have shown that local vibrations of
large amplitude are induced in the stay cables of cable-
stayed bridges under wind and traffic loading (Fujino et
al., 1997). This phenomenon has been confirmed in
vibration tests on the Hitsuishijima Bridge (Okauchi et
al., 1992), the Yokura Bridge (Fujino et al., 1993) and the
Tatara Bridge (Manabe et al., 1999) in Japan. These
vibrations are considered to be local parametric vibrations
(i.e., dynamic instabilities) in the stay cable due to excitation
at the support by girder and/or tower oscillations. Since
multi-cable systems are widely used in cable-stayed
bridges, the natural frequencies of global vibration modes
can be close to the natural frequencies of the cables, so
bridges are prone to large-amplitude cables vibration. It is
clear that further research is necessary on the parametric
vibrations of cables in cable-stayed bridges.
Kovacs (Kovacs, 1982) was the first to point out the
possibility of such parametric vibrations. The problem
has been analyzed recently from a number of perspectives
(Fujino et al., 1993; Nagai et al., 1992; Pinto da Costa et
al., 1995; Takahashi et al., 2000). Generally, large-amplitude
vibrations of the cables in a cable-stayed bridge can be
induced when the natural frequency of global vibration
modes is either close to that of the cables (the second
unstable region) or twice that of the cables (the principal
unstable region). In their study, the cables were given
periodic time-varying displacement at the supports.
However, the study did not explain local vibrations in the
cables under environmental and service loadings (such as
wind and earthquake) in terms of the vibration characteristics
of the whole bridge system.
In this paper, the authors analyze the Hizen-Takashima
Bridge (tentative name) using finite cable elements
(Kimura et al., 2005) to investigate parametric vibrations
of the stay cables. In the finite element model of a cable-
stayed bridge, each stay cable is represented by a certain
number of finite cable elements so that parametric
vibrations can be included in the stay cable vibrations.
The overall response of the girder, towers and stay cables
can be simultaneously obtained by using a whole-bridge
approach.
The dynamic characteristics of cable parametric vibrations
in a steel cable-stayed bridge are discussed using this
whole-bridge approach. Because parametric vibrations of
the stay cables may occur under periodic excitation,
dynamic analysis is first performed for the case where the
cable-stayed bridge is subjected to periodic sinusoidal
excitation. Comparing the responses obtained by this whole-
bridge method with those obtained using the approximate
approach, the effect of cable vibrations, including parametric
vibrations, on the overall dynamic characteristics of a
composite cable-stayed bridge with a steel girder and
reinforced concrete (RC) towers is discussed in detail.
Furthermore, the possibility of using chord elements to
simulate parametric of stay cable is noted.
Note.-Discussion open until May 1, 2009. This manuscript for thispaper was submitted for review and possible publication on Septem-ber 12, 2008; approved on November 21, 2008
*Corresponding authorTel: +81-95-819-2610; Fax: +81-95-819-2627E-mail: [email protected]
278 Kensuke Tanaka et al.
2. The Bridge
The Hizen-Takashima Bridge (tentative name) is an
isolated island bridge. It crosses the Hibi strait, connecting
Hizencho, Karatsushi, Saga and Takashimacho, Matsurashi,
Nagasaki. As shown in Fig. 1(a), the main span is 400 m
and the two side spans are 220 m. The bridge is 9.75 m
wide, as shown in Fig. 1(c). It is scheduled for
completion in 2007. The purpose of the bridge is to
promote sightseeing and industrial development in the
area.
A composite cable-stayed bridge with a steel girder and
RC towers was chosen to minimize construction costs, as
shown in Figure 1(c). The towers are of the inverted-Y
design and the cables consist of a two-plane multiple-
cable system arranged in a fan pattern. The bridge data
are summarized in Table 1. The cable numbers are shown
in Fig. 1(a). The cables are numbered sequentially from
the side span to the main span.
3. Analysis Model and Dynamic Analysis Procedure
3.1 Analysis model
Three-dimensional finite element models are used to
model the girder and towers. The girder is treated as a
single central spine with offset links to the cable anchor
points. Two approaches are employed for the cables in
this analysis: a divided model and a non-divided model.
The stay cables in the divided model are split into eight
cable elements (Kimura et al., 2005) using a method
proposed by the authors. The non-divided model uses a
single string element for each cable. The equivalent
modulus concept proposed by Ernst (Ernst 1965) is used
to describe the behavior of the stay cables. The natural
vibration of each stay cable can be obtained by the
equation of motion of a single cable (Pinto da Costa et
al., 1995).
Figure 1. General view of the Hizen-Takashima Bridge unit (mm).
Table 1. Data of the bridge
Length of bridge (m) 840
Center span (m) 400
Side span (m)Left 220
Right 220
Width of bridge (m) 9.75
Height of girder (m) 2
Shape of main tower Reversed Y
Height of main tower (m) 105
Cable Fan shape (two plane)
Analysis of Local Vibrations in the Stay Cables of the Hizen-Takashima Bridge 279
Table 2 shows the number of nodes and the number of
elements used in this study.
The effect of pier foundations on their displacement
and rotation in the longitudinal and out-of-plane directions
is modeled by a linear spring. Rubber bearings for
distributing earthquake shear force are installed at the
joints between girder and piers and these are modeled by
linear springs.
The mass of each member is concentrated at the nodal
points as a lumped mass. In addition, the beam elements,
which consist of geometric non-linear beam elements,
and the material characteristics take account only of the
elastic domain so as to make linear analysis applicable.
Table 3 shows the material characteristics of the beam
elements used in the study.
3.2. Analytical technique
3.2.1. Modeling of the cable
Because the natural frequency of a cable is not obtained
by FEM analysis when it is modeled by a string element,
the natural frequency of stay cables must be solved using
another method. The equation of motion of a flat cable
can be obtained using a partial differential equation (Pinto
da Costa et al., 1995).
The first natural frequency f1 and second natural
frequency f2, taking into account the sag of a fixed cable,
are given by following equations:
(1)
(2)
Here, , , , L is the
L is the span of the cable, F0 is the initial tension of the
cable, s is the cross-sectional area of the cable, γ is the
angle of inclination of the cable to the vertical, E is the
Young’s modulus of the cable and m is the mass per the
unit length of the cable.
3.2.2. Selection of cable prone to parametric vibration
Large amplitude parametric vibrations may be induced
in a stay cable when the natural frequency of the global
vibration mode of a cable-stayed bridge is either close to
that of the cables (the second unstable region) or twice
that of the cables (the principal unstable region). The
relationship between the natural frequencies of the global
vibration mode and of the cables must be checked.
3.2.3 Periodic excitation
In this paper, the discussion focuses on the characteristics
of local parametric vibrations in the cables under
sinusoidal excitation. Such excitation may be induced by
an exciter during a vibration test. The amplitude of the
excitation force is assumed to be 50 kN.
4. Analytical Results
4.1. Natural frequency of the whole bridge system
Table 4 shows the computed natural frequencies of the
whole bridge system. The tower mode has a low natural
frequency of 0.353 Hz, thought to be attributable to the
high mass of the main tower, which is made of RC,
compared with a steel tower.
Furthermore, the 1st torsional symmetric mode appears
with a relatively higher frequency of 1.251 Hz since the
bridge is narrow. Furthermore, Table 5 illustrates some of
the modes of global girder-tower vibration. As this
demonstrates, the difference between the two modeling
approaches is no more than 2%. The natural frequency
obtained using the string element is slightly larger than
that obtained using the cable element.
f1
1
2L------
F0
m----- 1
1
2---
2
π---⎝ ⎠⎛ ⎞
4
+ λ2
⎩ ⎭⎨ ⎬⎧ ⎫
1
2---
=
f2
1
L---
F0
m-----=
λκ
F0Es⁄
-----------------= κ χL= χ mg γ F0
⁄sin=
Table 2. Number of point and element
Number of nodal point
Main girder 94
Rigid body 178
Main tower 136×2=272
CableChord element 0
Cable element 7×18×4=504
TotalChord element 544
Cable element 1048
Number of element
Main girder Beam element 93
Rigid body Beam element 144
Main tower Beam element 78×2=156
Bridge pier Beam element 142
Support Spring element 76
CableChord element 72
Cable element 576
TotalChord element 683
Cable element 1187
Table 3. Characteristic of using material
ContentMaterial
Steel Concrete
Young’s modulus (kN/m2) 2.0×108 3.1×107
Elastic shear modulus (kN/m2) 7.7×107 1.4×107
Poisson’s ratio 0.3 0.2
Table 4. Frequency of whole bridge system (Division model)
Modenumber
Frequency(Hz)
Mode
1 0.214 1st out-of-place symmetric mode
2 0.353 Tower mode
3 0.443 1st vertical asymmetric mode
43 0.665 2nd vertical symmetric mode
162 1.251 1st torsional symmetric mode
280 Kensuke Tanaka et al.
4.2. Natural frequency of the cable
Table 6 shows the in-plane natural frequencies of the
stay cables using the cable element method and using
analytical approach using equation (1). The difference
between the two methods is again no more than 2%. The
previous our approach which calculates natural frequency
of stay cable by using differential equation of flat cable is
useful to calculate the local natural frequency of the stay
cable.
4.3. Influence of material employed
By analyzing cable-stayed bridges constructed in Japan,
the relationship between overall natural frequency and
that of the stay cables is investigated to examine the
effects of construction material. The steel bridges used in
this study are the Ohshima Bridge (350 m) and the
Megami Bridge (480 m) while the PC bridges are the
Yobuko Bridge (250 m) and the Aomori Bay Bridge
(240 m). Table 7 shows the materials employed in each
bridge and the natural frequencies of the global modes
and of local cable vibration for the longest and shortest
cables. Since a steel bridge has a lower total weight than
a PC bridge, the cable tension is relatively smaller. The
relationship between natural frequencies for the Hizen-
Takashima bridge are given as those of a steel bridge
since the girder material is steel.
4.4. Relationship between global and cable natural
frequencies
Figure 2 describes the relationship between the natural
frequencies of the global modes and those of the cables.
The figure shows the natural frequencies of the cables
(corresponding to the second unstable region) and the
doubled natural frequencies (corresponding to the principal
unstable region). Parametric vibration may occur when
Table 5. Natural girder-tower modes
Table 6. Natural frequency of cable
Cablenumber
1st natural frequency (Hz)
Divisonmodel
Non-divided model
Difference(%)
C1 0.576 0.586 1.7
C2 0.614 0.626 2.0
C3 0.685 0.695 1.5
C4 0.784 0.792 1.0
C5 0.922 0.929 0.8
C6 1.042 1.049 0.7
C7 1.182 1.188 0.5
C8 1.396 1.400 0.3
C9 1.656 1.659 0.2
Analysis of Local Vibrations in the Stay Cables of the Hizen-Takashima Bridge 281
the natural frequency or twice the natural frequency of a
stay cable is close to that of the global natural vibration
mode of the whole bridge. Table 8 summarizes the cable
numbers in which local parametric vibration might occur.
There is a possibility of parametric vibrations resulting
from the second unstable region in stay cable C3, C4, C5,
C13, C15 and others at lower modes of global vibration.
There is also a possibility that parametric vibrations
arising from the primary region of C2 and C15 will be
generated in response to the 1st torsional mode of vibration.
Table 7. Relation between natural frequency of whole system and cable for different materials
Bridge nameLength of
Span(m)
Main girdermaterial
Main towermaterial
Natural frequency of whole system
(Hz)
1st frequency ofThe longest cable
(Hz)
1st frequency ofThe shortest cable
(Hz)
Hizen-TakashimaBridge
400 Steel R C
0.3260.3590.4430.6770.781
0.576 1.539
Ohshima Bridge 350 Steel Steel
0.2330.306 0.4200.6971.133
0.618 1.468
Megami Bridge 480 Steel Steel
0.2540.3590.5190.6280.665
0.427 1.488
Yobuko Oohashi 250 PC PC
0.3150.3620.7240.8463.230
0.854 8.017
Aomori BayBridge
240 PC PC
0.3510.5180.7840.9330.791
1.142 2.940
Figure 2. Relationship between natural frequencies the global modes and those of the cables.
282 Kensuke Tanaka et al.
4.5. Dynamic characteristics under periodic excitation
4.5.1. Vertical periodic excitation
This section discusses the dynamic properties of the
cable-stayed bridge under vertical sinusoidal loading
corresponding to P=Asinωt. The 2nd vertical symmetric
mode of 0.665 Hz is adopted as the excitation frequency.
Since this mode is symmetric over the bridge length, the
excitation point is made the center of the main span. The
excitation direction is vertical and the amplitude 50 kN.
Figures 3 and 4 show the maximum displacement response
of the girder in the vertical and axial directions. The
origin of the abscissa represents the center point of the
center span. The response of the bridge in the axial
direction is large in the vicinity of the center of the side
spans. On the other hand, the response in the vertical
direction is greatest at the excitation point in the center of
the main span. Figure 5 shows the girder response in the
axial direction and the response at the mid-point of the
cable. The ordinate expresses the response in the axial
direction and the abscissa the coordinate of the axial
direction. Also △ shows the displacement response of the
girder at the cable anchorage point and ▲ is the
displacement response of the cable mid-point. The
response in the axial direction is no more than 0.05 m in
many of the cables, as shown in Fig. 5. However, it is
greater than the girder response in cables C2, C3, C16
and C17, which are those where the possibility of
parametric vibration was noted. The response exceeds
0.35 m in C16. From Figure 6, the shorter cables exhibit
little response in the vertical direction. However, a large
vertical response occurs in cables C2, C3, C16 and C17
as compared with the girder response. Overall, large
amplitude vibrations occur in stay cables C2 and C17 and
the adjacent C3 and C16.
Table 8. Cables in which local parametric vibration may be occur
Vibration mode Natural frequency (Hz) Cable number
2nd vertical symmetric mode 0.677 C3 (Sub), C16 (Sub)
2nd vertical asymmetric mode 0.781 C4 (Sub)
3rd vertical asymmetric mode 0.905 C5 (Sub)
4th vertical symmetric mode 0.959 C13 (Sub)
5th vertical symmetric mode 1.164 C7 (Sub)
1st torsional symmetric mode 1.252 C2 (Primary,Sub of 2nd)C17 (Primary,Sub of 2nd)
6th vertical symmetric mode 1.280 C11 (Vice)
5th vertical asymmetric mode 1.331 C16 (Primary,Sub of 2nd)
2nd torsional symmetric mode 1.341 C3 (Primary,Sub of 2nd)
6th vertical asymmetric mode 1.376 C16 (Primary,Sub of 2nd)
C8 (Sub)
3rd torsional symmetric mode 1.435 C15 (Primary,Sub of 2nd)
8th vertical symmetric mode 1.534 C10 (Sub)
Figure 5. Maximum axial response of the girder and staycables under vertical excitation (0.665 Hz).
Figure 6. Maximum vertical response of the girder andstay cables under vertical excitation (0.665 Hz).
Figure 3. Maximum axial response of the girder undervertical excitation (0.665 Hz).
Figure 4. Maximum vertical response of the girder undervertical excitation (0.665 Hz).
Analysis of Local Vibrations in the Stay Cables of the Hizen-Takashima Bridge 283
4.5.2. Torsional periodic excitation
This section discusses the dynamic properties of the
cable-stayed bridge under torsional loading. Since this
mode is also symmetric over the bridge length, the
excitation point is set to the center of the main span. The
freedom of the excitation point is rotation along the
longitudinal direction and the amplitude of the sinusoidal
excitation is 500 kNm. Figures 7 and 8 show the maximum
displacement responses in the axial direction and in the
out-of-plane direction of the girder. The origin of the
abscissa represents the center of the main span. The
maximum response in the axial direction is large at the
center of main span and is small in the side spans. From
Fig. 9, the response in the axial direction appears only in
the main span, and does not appear in the side span.
Under torsional excitation, the greatest axial response
occurs in stay cables C11, C16, and C17. From Fig. 10,
displacement response in the out-of-plane direction
occurs in cables C2, C11, C16 and C17.
It is understood through this study that no large response
in either the axial direction or the out-of-plane direction
occurs in the side span.
Conclusions
Local parametric vibrations in the stay cables of an
actual cable-stayed bridge are examined when the bridge
is subjected to sinusoidal excitation. The focus is on
evaluating the dynamic characteristics of a steel cable-
stayed bridge using a whole-bridge approach. Through
analysis and resulting discussions, the characteristics of
local parametric cable vibrations are determined. The
results of the study can be summarized as follows:
(1) Comparing the use of cable elements and chord
elements in modeling the cables, it is confirmed that the
cable finite elements proposed by the authors for
modeling the stay cables are preferable in the whole-
bridge approach since they lead to correct evaluation of
non-linear cable vibrations including parametric vibrations.
(2) The dynamic characteristics of the stay cables can
be evaluated using either a whole-bridge approach or an
approximate approach. However, the response values of
the cables are different by the two methods. This
difference may be responsible for the different axial force
fluctuant of stay cables at both ends of one girder. In the
method used here, the cable is divided into elements and
the natural frequency is calculated for the cable as one
continuum.
(3) The parametric vibration characteristics of the
present bridge, which is a composite bridge, are similar to
those of a steel bridge.
Acknowledgment
The authors wish to express their gratitude to Nagasaki
Prefecture for providing the materials used in this study.
References
Ernst, H. J. (1965). “Der E-modul von seilen unter
berucksichtigen des durchhangens”, Der Baingenieur 40,
pp. 52-55 .
Fujino, Y. and et al., (1993). “Dynamic testing of a timber
cable-stayed bridge (Yokura Bridge)”, 1993 Proceedings
of Annual Conference of the Japan Society of Civil
Engineering, Part 1, pp. 752-753, (in Japanese).
Fujino, Y., Warnitchai, P. and Pacheco, B.M. (1993). “An
experimental and analytical study of autoparametric
resonance in a 3 DOF model of cable-stayed-beam”,
Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics, pp. 111-138.
Fujino, Y. and Kimura, K. (1997). “Cables and cable
vibration in cable-supported bridge”, Proceedings of
International Seminar on Cable Dynamics, Technical
Figure 7. Maximum axial response of the girder undertorsional excitation (1.251 Hz).
Figure 8. Maximum out-of-plane response of the girderunder torsional excitation (1.251 Hz).
Figure 9. Maximum axial response of the girder andcables under torsional excitation (1.251 Hz).
Figure 10. Maximum out-of-plane response of the girderand cables under torsional excitation (1.251 Hz).
284 Kensuke Tanaka et al.
Committee on Cable Structures and Wind, Japan
Association for Wind Engineers, pp. 1-11.
Kimura, T., Wu, Q. Takahashi, K. and Nakamura, S. (2005).
“Study on comparison of dynamic response of cable-
stayed bridge using cable element method and string
element method”, 2005 Proceedings of Annual
Conference of the Japan Society of Civil Engineering,
Part 1, pp. 1147-1148, (in Japanese).
Kovacs, I. (1982). “Zur frage der seilschwingdngen und der
seildampfung”, Die Bautechnik, 10, pp. 325~332.
Manabe, Y., Sasaki, N. and Yamaguchi, K. (1999). “Field
vibration test of the Tatara Bridge”, Bridge and
Foundation, Vol. 33, pp. 27-30, (in Japanese).
Nagai, M., Kawahata, O. and Arimura, H. (1992). “Relations
between fundamental natural frequencies of girder and
cables in cable-stayed girder bridges”, Journal of
Structural Engineering, Vol. 38A, pp. 1143-1152, (in
Japanese).
Okauchi, I., Miyata, T., Tatsumi, M. and Sasaki, N. (1992).
“Field vibration test of a long-span cable-stayed bridge by
large exciters”, Journal of Structural Mechanics and
Earthquake Engineering, No. 455/I-21, pp. 75-84, (in
Japanese).
Pinto da Costa, A. and Martins, J.A.C. (1995). “The
nonlinear oscillations of inclined excited periodic motion
of their supports”, International Symposium on Cable
Dynamics, pp. 205-212 .
Takahashi, K., Wu, Q., Nakamura, S., Kubota, N. and Ida, Y.
(2000). “Analysis of local vibrations of stay cables in
cable-stayed bridges”, Journal of Structural Engineering,
Vol. 46A, pp. 501-510, (in Japanese).