Agricultural Economics
Lecture 8: Agricultural Trade
What’s happening to world ag. trade?Figure 1.1 Value of World Agricultural Trade, 1974-2003
(billions of U.S. dollars)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
What’s happening to world ag. trade?Fig. 1.2 Agricultural Exports of Selected Countries,
1974-2003 (billions of U.S. dollars)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70USFranceNetherlandsGermany
Income per person, 1995 (with sub-national data for 19 countries)
Source: Sachs, JD, “Tropical Underdevelopment.” NBER Working Paper 8119. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
Who are the ag. exporters? Why?
Agricultural Employment as a Share of Civilian Employment and Real Farm Output as a Share of Real GDP
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Commerce and the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Reprinted from K.L. Kliesen and W. Poole, 2000. "Agriculture Outcomes and Monetary Policy Actions: Kissin' Cousins?" Federal Reserve Bank of Sf. Louis Review 82 (3): 1-12.
Source: K.L. Kliesen and W. Poole, 2000. " Agriculture Outcomes and Monetary Policy Actions: Kissin' Cousins?" Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 82 (3): 1-12.
Food Expenditures as a Share of Total Consumer Expenditures in the US
The gains from trade are similar for both“importable” and “exportable” goods
Pt
Pe
QdQe
Supply
Demand
Price($/unit)
A B
Qs
Pt
Pe
QsQe
A B
Qdwith imports, consumers gain more than producers lose:
with exports, producers gain more than consumers lose:
So why don’t we see free trade?
Pt
Pe
QdQe
A B
Qs
Pt
Pe
QsQe
A B
Qd
To understand trade policy, let’s start by describing it: For which goods do governments usually restrict trade?Effect of free trade
in importable goodsEffect of free trade in exportable goods
Given these effects of trade, what do governments choose to do?Free trade…
for imports helps consumers but hurts producers;
for exports helps producers but hurts consumers.
Which constituencies do governments favor?
Protection from imports in the world economy, 1997
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0D
airy
pro
duct
sPr
oces
sed
rice
Whe
atPa
ddy
rice
Beve
rage
s +
toba
cco
Oil
seed
sSu
gar c
ane,
sug
ar b
eet
Suga
rM
eat p
rodu
cts
nec
Mea
t: ca
ttle,
shee
p, e
tc.
Cer
eal g
rain
s ne
cVe
geta
bles
, fru
it, n
uts
Food
pro
duct
s ne
cC
rops
nec
Vege
tabl
e oi
ls a
nd fa
tsC
attle
,she
ep,g
oats
,hor
ses
Raw
milk
Wea
ring
appa
rel
Mot
or v
ehic
les
and
parts
Man
ufac
ture
s ne
cTe
xtile
sAn
imal
pro
duct
s ne
cLe
athe
r pro
duct
sM
iner
al p
rodu
cts
nec
Fish
ing
Ferro
us m
etal
sM
etal
pro
duct
sW
ool,
silk
-wor
m c
ocoo
nsW
ood
prod
ucts
Mac
hine
ry +
equ
ip. n
ecC
hem
ical
,rubb
er,p
last
ics
Petro
leum
, coa
l pro
duct
sPa
per p
rodu
cts,
Met
als
nec
Elec
troni
c eq
uipm
ent
Tran
spor
t equ
ipm
ent n
ecPl
ant-b
ased
fibe
rsO
ilM
iner
als
nec
Fore
stry
Coa
lBu
sine
ss s
ervi
ces
nec
Com
mun
icat
ion
Fina
ncia
l ser
vice
s ne
c
Tarif
f-equ
ival
ent i
mpo
rt re
stric
tions
.
(% o
f wor
ld p
rice)
USA Oth.High-Inc. Med.Income Low Income
…So why do governments restrict imports? the most common arguments against free trade are:
foreigners are “dumping” their products and will raise their prices eventually our producers are “infant industries” and will reduce their costs eventually pollution, labor standards or other “market failures” make prices not reflect full
costs/benefits if we have a large share of the world market, restricting trade could improve
our prices all these could be true, but economists find that they do not actually explain what
governments do
the only plausible explanation is that governments favor some groups over others. This is a significant source of inefficiency and low incomes in all economies!
Beginning from the year 1980, Turkey changed its economic development policy from “import substituting industrialization” to “export led growth” strategy. Economy opened up to world trade, export-promoting incentives were initiated (including tax exemptions, rebates and favorable credit terms), direct import controls have been eliminated, and quantity restrictions have been dismantled. State intervention in the economy was reduced to minimum level. As a result of these efforts, Turkey has increased her share from world markets, from 0,15% in 1980 to 0,6% in the year 2003. Between 1980 and 2004 exports of Turkey has increased from 2,9 billion dollars to 63 billion dollars. Structure of exported goods has also changed much from mainly agricultural products and raw materials to higher value added industrial products. Transformation still continues with increasing exports of transportation vehicles and office equipments.
The Share of Foreign Trade in GNP
0,00
20,00
40,00
60,00
80,00
1970 1980 1990 2000 2003 2004* 2005**
%
Imports Exports Volume Deficit
Turkey's Foreign Trade ($ Million) % Change
1990 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2004/ 2003
Exports (FOB) 12 959 21 637 27 775 31 334 36 059 47 253 63 121
33,6
Imports (CIF) 22 302 35 709 54 503 41 399 51 554 69 340 97 540
40,7
Volume 35 261 57 346 82 278 72 733 87 613 116 593
160 66
1 37,8
Balance - 9 343 - 14 072 - 26 728 - 10 065 - 15 495 - 22 087 - 34 419 55,8
Exp./Imp. 58,1 60,6 51,0 75,7 69,9 68,1 64,7 -5,0
Trade and Welfare Autarky/closed economy – the nation is self-
sufficient, no trade takes place between nations, and markets are in equilibrium.
Arbitrage – purchasing commodities in one market at a low price and rapidly selling them in another market at a higher price.
Partial equilibrium and excess supply – goods will always move from where prices are low (excess supply) to where prices are high (excess demand).
Page 528
The equilibrium price in the U.S. market is PUS.at prices above PUS, themarket would exhibit excess supply conditions.
At price PE, for example,producers would supplyQSUS3 while consumerswould only want QDUS4.
Page 528
The market equilibrium inJapan occurs at Pj. At pricesbelow Pj, excess demandconditions will occur.
At PE, for example, consumerswere willing to buy QDj4 while producers only wished to supply QSj3.
Page 528
U.S. price where excesssupply (ES0) is equalto zero…
Page 528
Japanese price whereexcess demand (ED0)is equal to zero…
Page 528
If the price in Japanis Pj2, excess demandwould be ED1.
If the price in the U.S.is PUS2, excess supplywould be ES1.
Page 528
Thru trade, both country’smarkets would be in equilibrium where ED=ESat price PE.
Page 528
If the price in Japan is PE, consumer surplus would increase by area a+b whileproducer surplus would fall by area a.
If the price in the U.S. isPE, consumer surplus woulddecline by area 1+2 whileproducer surplus wouldincrease by area 1+2+3.
Gains to TradeUnited States Japan
Consumer gains -(1+2) +(a+b)
Producer gains +(1+2+3) -(a)
Net societal gain +3 +b
Both countries register a net societal gainin economic welfare. The winners andlosers differ however…
Why Restrict Trade? To protect a new or infant industry To counter unfair foreign competition To improve the balance of payments To protect national health, the
environment or food safety
Trade RestrictionsTariff barriersNontariff barriers (NTB)
Voluntary export restraints (VERs)
Tariff-rate quotas (TRQ) Import quotas
Page 534
Domesticdemand
Domesticsupply
Domestic market equilibriumunder free market conditionsshows a price of $4,000 andquantity of 50 tons.
50
Page 534
Free trade supply
Prevailingworld price
Quantitysupplied
Quantitydemanded
Excess Demand60 = 80 – 20
Page 534
Prevailingworld priceplus tariff
Quantitysupplied
Quantitydemanded
Excess Demand20 = 60 – 40
Supply with tariff
Welfare Effects of Tariff
Consumer surplus before the tariff on the previousslide was equal to area a+b+c+d+e+f+g.
After the tariff, consumer surplus would fall to area e+f+g, or a loss of area a+b+c+d.
Producer surplus increases from area h to area a+hafter the tariff.
The tariff revenue received by the government is equal to area c.
Dead-weight loss to society is equal to area b+d.
Page 539
Autarkicprice
Page 539
Free tradesupply
Page 539
Combines both a tariffand a quota…
Tariff rate for imports under quota
Free tradesupply
Page 539
Combines both a tariffand a quota…
Tariff rate for imports under quota
Tariff rate for imports over quota
Free tradesupply
Page 539
Combines both a tariffand a quota…
Tariff rate for imports under quota
Tariff rate for imports over quota
Free tradesupply
Producersurplusincreasesby area eas price to $200
Welfare Effects of TRQConsumer surplus would fall as a result of theTRQ by area e+f+d+a+c+b+g.
Producer surplus increases by area e+d
The revenue received by the government is equal to area a+b+c.
Dead-weight loss to society is equal to area f+g.