2006
3D Shape Retrieval ContestRemco Veltkamp, Utrecht University
Participants
1. Chaouch et al., INRIA, France, 2. Daras et al., Thessaloniki, Greece, 3. Jayanti et al., Purdue University, Indiana, 4. Laga et al., NAIST, Japan,5. Makadia et al., University of Pennsylvania, 6. Papadakis et al., Athens, Greece, 7. Shilane et al., Princeton University, New Jersey, 8. Zaharia et al., INT, France,
Test collection
Princeton Shape Benchmark, training set + test set
1814 models, renamed, reordered, flattened
PSB classification: 197 classes
Queries
Performance evaluation
Highly relevant: score 2Marginally relevant: score 1
Precision, Recall First, Second Tier (Normalized) (Discounted)
Cumulated Gain Average Dynamic Recall
Performance evaluation
Cumulated gain [1,100]
Performance evaluation
Performance evaluation
Mean average dynamic recall
Conclusions
Excellent opportunity to compare algorithms and analyze strengths and weaknesses
More tracks wanted (polygon soup/watertight, whole/partial, 3D face, molecules?)
More test collections and ground truths wanted
Resources
Proceedings, all performance numbers, test collection, queries available via:
http://www.aimatshape.net/event/SHREC
What’s next
SHREC2007 SMI2007
Thanks …
… to all participants!