2006

3D Shape Retrieval ContestRemco Veltkamp, Utrecht University

Participants

1. Chaouch et al., INRIA, France, 2. Daras et al., Thessaloniki, Greece, 3. Jayanti et al., Purdue University, Indiana, 4. Laga et al., NAIST, Japan,5. Makadia et al., University of Pennsylvania, 6. Papadakis et al., Athens, Greece, 7. Shilane et al., Princeton University, New Jersey, 8. Zaharia et al., INT, France,

Test collection

Princeton Shape Benchmark, training set + test set

1814 models, renamed, reordered, flattened

PSB classification: 197 classes

Queries

Performance evaluation

Highly relevant: score 2Marginally relevant: score 1

Precision, Recall First, Second Tier (Normalized) (Discounted)

Cumulated Gain Average Dynamic Recall

Performance evaluation

Cumulated gain [1,100]

Performance evaluation

Performance evaluation

Mean average dynamic recall

Conclusions

Excellent opportunity to compare algorithms and analyze strengths and weaknesses

More tracks wanted (polygon soup/watertight, whole/partial, 3D face, molecules?)

More test collections and ground truths wanted

Resources

Proceedings, all performance numbers, test collection, queries available via:

http://www.aimatshape.net/event/SHREC

What’s next

SHREC2007 SMI2007

Thanks …

… to all participants!