FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF1_---IIIIIIiIIII---- - 0 U A ________ f1doeorg
bull
DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN
The intent of the District Digital Classroom Plan (DCP) is to provide a perspective on what the district considers being vital and critically important in relation digital learning implementation the improvement of student performance outcomes and how this progress will be measured The plan shall meet the unique needs of students schools and personnel in the district as required by s101162(l2)(b) FS
Part I DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - OVERVIEW
The Districts overview component of the plan should document the districts overall focus and direction with respect to how the incorporation and integration of technology into the educational program will improve student performance outcomes
The general introductionibackgroundiDistrict technology policies component of the plan should include but not be limited to
11 District Mission and Vision statements shy
Our Vision
The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School will develop and enhance students technological skills and abilities
Our Mission
The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School is dedicated to empowering students by infusing technology within a learning environment
12 District Profile - Provide relevant social economic geographic and demographic factors influencing the districts implementation oftechnology
The FSUS-Broward district consists ofone developmental research (lab) school sponsored by Florida State University The city ofPembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School (PPCES-FSU) which is located in Broward County Florida is part ofthe Pembroke Pines Charter School system The demographic data ofPPCES-FSU students closely mirrors that of the state The population is comprised ofWhites (32) African-Americans (33) Hispanics (33) and Asians (2)
PPCES-FSU is a high-performing school that achieves academic excellence by actively invo lving parents and community members through an active PTA board committees volunteerism an interactive website and televised City Commission meetings
The school uses disaggregated data and stakeholder surveys to make data-driven decisions to implement current technologies and digital resources throughout the school Policies and
procedures are continuously developed by the school systems technology team to support schools and teacher preparation programs These programs are designed for the effective implementation of techno logy in order to meet curriculum and learning technology standards ensure organizational effectiveness and enhance student performance
The City of Pembroke Pines Florida State University Charter Elementary School is dedicated fiber to high speed internet service provider Internet access is provisioned via 100 mbps MetroshyEthernet Internet uplink Wireless access is provided via 10 Ruckus access points throughout all classrooms The network supports 181 PCs 60 laptops and 8 tablets for staff and student use
Authentication and fileprint servers are located at each campus All schools access centralized services at the data center located at the City ofPembroke Pines Charter Academic Village Campus Centralized services include district databases Internet filtering web hosting and various educational programs Other servers host infrastructure management services like patch management anti-virus updates and desktop software deployment services
Google Applications for Education provide communication collaboration and publishing services to all staff and any students that require it The system also has access to a variety of cloud- based educational programs including Renaissance Place and Think Central
Equal access to technology will provide staff and students with the tools needed to maximize the learning environment and is critical to ensuring the success ofall students To that end PPCES engages in a constant cycle of planning implementation and reassessing the curriculum to ensure that students will be able to fully utilize technology as a learning tool
13 District Team Profile - Provide the following contact information for each member of the district team participating in the DCP planning process The individuals that participated should include but not be limited to
o the digital learning components should be completed with collaboration between district instructional curriculum and information technology staff as required in s101162(12)(b) FS
o development of partnerships with community business and industry and o integration of technology in all areas of the curriculum ESOL and special needs
including students with disabilities
TitlelRole Name EmailPhone Information Technology District Michael Lockett mJockettIminescom Contact 9544356517 Curriculum District Contact Judith Founds jfoundspinescharternet
9544994244 Instructional District Contact NA NA
Finance District Contact Aner Gonzalez agonzalezm~inescom
9544314884 District Leadership Contact Dr Lisa Libidinsky llibidinskvragtninescharternet
92214 Page 2
I 9544994244
14 Planning Process- Summarize the process used to write this plan including but not limited to
o how parents school staff and others were involved o development of partnerships with community business and industry and o integration of technology in all areas of the curriculum ESOL and special needs
including students with disabilities
PPCES-FSUs teclmology plan reflects the districts overall Strategic Plan As part of the Strategic Plan the teclmology supports the curriculum goals of the school and promotes meaningful engaged learning for all students It is a tool for improving and transforming teaching and learning and providing for needed professional development and support The plan further responds to the flexibility to change
Through collaboration and communication school administrators teacher leaders parents students and other stakeholders convened to review and update existing teclmology goals Results ofstakeholder climate surveys needs assessments professional development and student data were analyzed in the development of this plan Student data included Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) that were analyzed by subgroup to determine the instructional and teclmology that would inspire transformational change within the classroom Goals directly addressed the needs of the entire student body including ESOL and ESE students After the teclmology team generated a collective vision for implementation the governing board city officials and community leaders reviewed and provided recommendations for the development approval of this plan
The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School has partnerships with local business organizations Through the support ofthese partnerships the school has been able to raise funds and elicit feedback needed to enrich the integration of technology
The plan was written for a three year period however is reviewed each year during the budget to make sure the school is addressing the most current equipment and is taking advantage of new and lower cost technology
15 Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)- Summarize the process used to write this plan including but not limited to
o data-based problem-solving process used for the goals and need analysis established in the plan
o the systems in place to monitor progress of the implementation plans and o the plan to support the implementation and capacity
The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School adopted Broward Countys MTSS plan To achieve the goal of providing every student with focused
92214 Page 3
academic support PPCES-FSU focuses on the differentiated needs of every student in every classroom Fidelity and implementation concentrates on accelerating and maximizing student academic achievement through the application ofdata-based problem solving and effective leadership at all levels The Collaborative Problem-Solving Team meets regularly to monitor student progress and evaluate the effectiveness of the student plans in relation to goals PPCES supports the implementation and capacity of the MTSS plan through human and material resources that align to the school achievement goals for all students
Part II DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN -STRATEGY
STEP 1- Need Analysis
Districts should identify current district needs based on student performance outcomes and other key measurable data elements for digital learning
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
bull Highest Student Achievement
Student Performance Outcomes Districts shall improve classroom teaching and learning to enable all students to be digital learners with access to digital tools and resources for the full integration of the Florida Standards
After completing the suggested activities for determining the student performance outcomes described in the DCP guidance document complete the table below with the targeted goals for each school grade component Districts may add additional student performance outcomes as appropriate Examples of additional measures are District Improvement and Assistance Plan (DIAP) goals district Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) andor other goals established in the district strategic plan
Data is required for the metrics listed in the table For the student performance outcomes these data points can and should be pulled from the school and district school grades published at httpschoolgradesf1doeorg Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate below in the table for district provided outcomes
Student Performance Outcomes (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved
92214 Page 4
(year) I
1 ELA Student Achievement 83 85 2015
2 Math Student Achievement 88 88 2015
3 Science Student Achievement 79 81 2015
4 ELA Learning Gains 75 pts 78 pts 2015
5 Math Learning Gains 79 pts 80 pts 2015 ~
6 ELA Learning Gains of the Low 25 73 75 2015
7 8
Math Learning Gains of the Low 25 Overall 4-year Graduation Rate
76 NA
71 NA
2015 NA
9 Acceleration Success Rate NA NA NA 10
bull Quality Efficient Services
Technology Infrastructure Districts shall create a digital learning infrastructure with the appropriate levels of bandwidth devices hardware and software
For the infrastructure needs analysis the required data points can and should be pulled from the Technology Readiness Inventory (TRI) if the data is accurate Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate
Infrastructure Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 Student to Computer Device Ratio 3 1 1 1 2017 2 Count of student instructio nal desktop
computers meeting specifications 181 80 2017
3 Count of student instructional mobile computers (laptops) meeting specifications
60 300 2017
4 Count of student web-thin client computers meeting specifications
0 0 2017
5 Count of student large screen tablets meeting specifications
8 50 2017
6 Percent of schools meeting recommended bandwidth standard
0 100 2015
7 Percent of wireless classrooms (80211n or higher)
0 100 2015
Infrastructure Needs Analysis (District Provided)
Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
8 Complete district wide rewiring to CAT6e
92214 Page 5
- currently using CA T3 creating internal 0 100 201512016
9 speed limitations Access layer Switches UPSs to ensure 201512016
network availability and success test 0 100
10 Full Network replacement Core to Access layer all sites with RouterlFirewall 0 100 2015
Enhancements
Skilled Workforce and Economic Development
Professional Development Instructional personnel and staff shall have access to opportunities and training to assist with the integration ofteclmology into classroom teaching
Professional Development should be evaluated based on the level ofcurrent teclmology integration by teachers into classrooms This will measure the impact of the professional development for digital learning into the classrooms The Teclmology Integration Matrix (TIM) can be found at httpfcitusfedulmatrixlmatrixphp Average integration should be recorded as the percent of teachers at each of the 5 categories of the TIM for the levels ofteclmology integration into the classroom curriculum
bull Entry bull Adoption bull Adaptation bull Infusion bull Transformation
Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (Required) Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 A verage Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM
2 Average Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM (Elementary Schools)
-Entry 5 0 2016 -Adoption 60 10 2016 -Adaptation 25 45 2016 -Infusion 8 30 2016 -Transformation 2 15 2017
3 A verage Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (High Schools)
4 Average Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (Combination Schools)
Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (District Provided) Target to be
92214 Page 6
Achieved (year)
5 6 7 8 9
Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here
Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning
Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively
Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses
Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ
in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time
Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to
Partially implemented
Will work to
2016
922114 Page 7
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and
implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
922114 Page 8
technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for
Target to be Achieved
(year)
10 11 12
bull Quality Efficient Services
Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments
Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window
Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (yearl
1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window
2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to
computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be
Achieved (year)
3 4 5
This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years
922114 Page 9
STEP 2 - Goal Setting
Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted
These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals
Goals Examples
EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet
expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for
industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed
bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum
bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students
Enter district goals below
bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school
bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement
bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources
bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning
bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners
STEP 3 - Strategy Setting
Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation
92214 Page 10
Examples of Strategies
EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement
Strategy Supply teachers and students with high
Measurement
bull Purchase Instructional
Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015
quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat
Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing
achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for
bull Integrate instructional
each student materials into system
Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps
supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments
bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms
bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e
bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches
bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016
Enter the district strategies below
Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains
Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field
Bandwidth amount 200Mbps
2014 and ongoing
922114 Page 11
trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I
25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools
I
I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I
certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer
Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-
boarding new grade levels in 2016
To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved
school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device
policyI
To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies
Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc
To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions
aligned to the needs of all learners
In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs
92214 Page 12
Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL
The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to
o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation
o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A
Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)
Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS
92214 Page 13
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
procedures are continuously developed by the school systems technology team to support schools and teacher preparation programs These programs are designed for the effective implementation of techno logy in order to meet curriculum and learning technology standards ensure organizational effectiveness and enhance student performance
The City of Pembroke Pines Florida State University Charter Elementary School is dedicated fiber to high speed internet service provider Internet access is provisioned via 100 mbps MetroshyEthernet Internet uplink Wireless access is provided via 10 Ruckus access points throughout all classrooms The network supports 181 PCs 60 laptops and 8 tablets for staff and student use
Authentication and fileprint servers are located at each campus All schools access centralized services at the data center located at the City ofPembroke Pines Charter Academic Village Campus Centralized services include district databases Internet filtering web hosting and various educational programs Other servers host infrastructure management services like patch management anti-virus updates and desktop software deployment services
Google Applications for Education provide communication collaboration and publishing services to all staff and any students that require it The system also has access to a variety of cloud- based educational programs including Renaissance Place and Think Central
Equal access to technology will provide staff and students with the tools needed to maximize the learning environment and is critical to ensuring the success ofall students To that end PPCES engages in a constant cycle of planning implementation and reassessing the curriculum to ensure that students will be able to fully utilize technology as a learning tool
13 District Team Profile - Provide the following contact information for each member of the district team participating in the DCP planning process The individuals that participated should include but not be limited to
o the digital learning components should be completed with collaboration between district instructional curriculum and information technology staff as required in s101162(12)(b) FS
o development of partnerships with community business and industry and o integration of technology in all areas of the curriculum ESOL and special needs
including students with disabilities
TitlelRole Name EmailPhone Information Technology District Michael Lockett mJockettIminescom Contact 9544356517 Curriculum District Contact Judith Founds jfoundspinescharternet
9544994244 Instructional District Contact NA NA
Finance District Contact Aner Gonzalez agonzalezm~inescom
9544314884 District Leadership Contact Dr Lisa Libidinsky llibidinskvragtninescharternet
92214 Page 2
I 9544994244
14 Planning Process- Summarize the process used to write this plan including but not limited to
o how parents school staff and others were involved o development of partnerships with community business and industry and o integration of technology in all areas of the curriculum ESOL and special needs
including students with disabilities
PPCES-FSUs teclmology plan reflects the districts overall Strategic Plan As part of the Strategic Plan the teclmology supports the curriculum goals of the school and promotes meaningful engaged learning for all students It is a tool for improving and transforming teaching and learning and providing for needed professional development and support The plan further responds to the flexibility to change
Through collaboration and communication school administrators teacher leaders parents students and other stakeholders convened to review and update existing teclmology goals Results ofstakeholder climate surveys needs assessments professional development and student data were analyzed in the development of this plan Student data included Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) that were analyzed by subgroup to determine the instructional and teclmology that would inspire transformational change within the classroom Goals directly addressed the needs of the entire student body including ESOL and ESE students After the teclmology team generated a collective vision for implementation the governing board city officials and community leaders reviewed and provided recommendations for the development approval of this plan
The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School has partnerships with local business organizations Through the support ofthese partnerships the school has been able to raise funds and elicit feedback needed to enrich the integration of technology
The plan was written for a three year period however is reviewed each year during the budget to make sure the school is addressing the most current equipment and is taking advantage of new and lower cost technology
15 Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)- Summarize the process used to write this plan including but not limited to
o data-based problem-solving process used for the goals and need analysis established in the plan
o the systems in place to monitor progress of the implementation plans and o the plan to support the implementation and capacity
The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School adopted Broward Countys MTSS plan To achieve the goal of providing every student with focused
92214 Page 3
academic support PPCES-FSU focuses on the differentiated needs of every student in every classroom Fidelity and implementation concentrates on accelerating and maximizing student academic achievement through the application ofdata-based problem solving and effective leadership at all levels The Collaborative Problem-Solving Team meets regularly to monitor student progress and evaluate the effectiveness of the student plans in relation to goals PPCES supports the implementation and capacity of the MTSS plan through human and material resources that align to the school achievement goals for all students
Part II DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN -STRATEGY
STEP 1- Need Analysis
Districts should identify current district needs based on student performance outcomes and other key measurable data elements for digital learning
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
bull Highest Student Achievement
Student Performance Outcomes Districts shall improve classroom teaching and learning to enable all students to be digital learners with access to digital tools and resources for the full integration of the Florida Standards
After completing the suggested activities for determining the student performance outcomes described in the DCP guidance document complete the table below with the targeted goals for each school grade component Districts may add additional student performance outcomes as appropriate Examples of additional measures are District Improvement and Assistance Plan (DIAP) goals district Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) andor other goals established in the district strategic plan
Data is required for the metrics listed in the table For the student performance outcomes these data points can and should be pulled from the school and district school grades published at httpschoolgradesf1doeorg Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate below in the table for district provided outcomes
Student Performance Outcomes (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved
92214 Page 4
(year) I
1 ELA Student Achievement 83 85 2015
2 Math Student Achievement 88 88 2015
3 Science Student Achievement 79 81 2015
4 ELA Learning Gains 75 pts 78 pts 2015
5 Math Learning Gains 79 pts 80 pts 2015 ~
6 ELA Learning Gains of the Low 25 73 75 2015
7 8
Math Learning Gains of the Low 25 Overall 4-year Graduation Rate
76 NA
71 NA
2015 NA
9 Acceleration Success Rate NA NA NA 10
bull Quality Efficient Services
Technology Infrastructure Districts shall create a digital learning infrastructure with the appropriate levels of bandwidth devices hardware and software
For the infrastructure needs analysis the required data points can and should be pulled from the Technology Readiness Inventory (TRI) if the data is accurate Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate
Infrastructure Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 Student to Computer Device Ratio 3 1 1 1 2017 2 Count of student instructio nal desktop
computers meeting specifications 181 80 2017
3 Count of student instructional mobile computers (laptops) meeting specifications
60 300 2017
4 Count of student web-thin client computers meeting specifications
0 0 2017
5 Count of student large screen tablets meeting specifications
8 50 2017
6 Percent of schools meeting recommended bandwidth standard
0 100 2015
7 Percent of wireless classrooms (80211n or higher)
0 100 2015
Infrastructure Needs Analysis (District Provided)
Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
8 Complete district wide rewiring to CAT6e
92214 Page 5
- currently using CA T3 creating internal 0 100 201512016
9 speed limitations Access layer Switches UPSs to ensure 201512016
network availability and success test 0 100
10 Full Network replacement Core to Access layer all sites with RouterlFirewall 0 100 2015
Enhancements
Skilled Workforce and Economic Development
Professional Development Instructional personnel and staff shall have access to opportunities and training to assist with the integration ofteclmology into classroom teaching
Professional Development should be evaluated based on the level ofcurrent teclmology integration by teachers into classrooms This will measure the impact of the professional development for digital learning into the classrooms The Teclmology Integration Matrix (TIM) can be found at httpfcitusfedulmatrixlmatrixphp Average integration should be recorded as the percent of teachers at each of the 5 categories of the TIM for the levels ofteclmology integration into the classroom curriculum
bull Entry bull Adoption bull Adaptation bull Infusion bull Transformation
Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (Required) Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 A verage Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM
2 Average Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM (Elementary Schools)
-Entry 5 0 2016 -Adoption 60 10 2016 -Adaptation 25 45 2016 -Infusion 8 30 2016 -Transformation 2 15 2017
3 A verage Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (High Schools)
4 Average Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (Combination Schools)
Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (District Provided) Target to be
92214 Page 6
Achieved (year)
5 6 7 8 9
Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here
Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning
Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively
Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses
Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ
in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time
Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to
Partially implemented
Will work to
2016
922114 Page 7
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and
implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
922114 Page 8
technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for
Target to be Achieved
(year)
10 11 12
bull Quality Efficient Services
Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments
Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window
Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (yearl
1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window
2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to
computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be
Achieved (year)
3 4 5
This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years
922114 Page 9
STEP 2 - Goal Setting
Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted
These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals
Goals Examples
EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet
expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for
industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed
bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum
bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students
Enter district goals below
bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school
bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement
bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources
bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning
bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners
STEP 3 - Strategy Setting
Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation
92214 Page 10
Examples of Strategies
EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement
Strategy Supply teachers and students with high
Measurement
bull Purchase Instructional
Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015
quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat
Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing
achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for
bull Integrate instructional
each student materials into system
Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps
supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments
bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms
bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e
bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches
bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016
Enter the district strategies below
Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains
Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field
Bandwidth amount 200Mbps
2014 and ongoing
922114 Page 11
trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I
25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools
I
I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I
certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer
Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-
boarding new grade levels in 2016
To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved
school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device
policyI
To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies
Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc
To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions
aligned to the needs of all learners
In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs
92214 Page 12
Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL
The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to
o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation
o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A
Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)
Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS
92214 Page 13
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
I 9544994244
14 Planning Process- Summarize the process used to write this plan including but not limited to
o how parents school staff and others were involved o development of partnerships with community business and industry and o integration of technology in all areas of the curriculum ESOL and special needs
including students with disabilities
PPCES-FSUs teclmology plan reflects the districts overall Strategic Plan As part of the Strategic Plan the teclmology supports the curriculum goals of the school and promotes meaningful engaged learning for all students It is a tool for improving and transforming teaching and learning and providing for needed professional development and support The plan further responds to the flexibility to change
Through collaboration and communication school administrators teacher leaders parents students and other stakeholders convened to review and update existing teclmology goals Results ofstakeholder climate surveys needs assessments professional development and student data were analyzed in the development of this plan Student data included Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) that were analyzed by subgroup to determine the instructional and teclmology that would inspire transformational change within the classroom Goals directly addressed the needs of the entire student body including ESOL and ESE students After the teclmology team generated a collective vision for implementation the governing board city officials and community leaders reviewed and provided recommendations for the development approval of this plan
The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School has partnerships with local business organizations Through the support ofthese partnerships the school has been able to raise funds and elicit feedback needed to enrich the integration of technology
The plan was written for a three year period however is reviewed each year during the budget to make sure the school is addressing the most current equipment and is taking advantage of new and lower cost technology
15 Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)- Summarize the process used to write this plan including but not limited to
o data-based problem-solving process used for the goals and need analysis established in the plan
o the systems in place to monitor progress of the implementation plans and o the plan to support the implementation and capacity
The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School adopted Broward Countys MTSS plan To achieve the goal of providing every student with focused
92214 Page 3
academic support PPCES-FSU focuses on the differentiated needs of every student in every classroom Fidelity and implementation concentrates on accelerating and maximizing student academic achievement through the application ofdata-based problem solving and effective leadership at all levels The Collaborative Problem-Solving Team meets regularly to monitor student progress and evaluate the effectiveness of the student plans in relation to goals PPCES supports the implementation and capacity of the MTSS plan through human and material resources that align to the school achievement goals for all students
Part II DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN -STRATEGY
STEP 1- Need Analysis
Districts should identify current district needs based on student performance outcomes and other key measurable data elements for digital learning
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
bull Highest Student Achievement
Student Performance Outcomes Districts shall improve classroom teaching and learning to enable all students to be digital learners with access to digital tools and resources for the full integration of the Florida Standards
After completing the suggested activities for determining the student performance outcomes described in the DCP guidance document complete the table below with the targeted goals for each school grade component Districts may add additional student performance outcomes as appropriate Examples of additional measures are District Improvement and Assistance Plan (DIAP) goals district Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) andor other goals established in the district strategic plan
Data is required for the metrics listed in the table For the student performance outcomes these data points can and should be pulled from the school and district school grades published at httpschoolgradesf1doeorg Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate below in the table for district provided outcomes
Student Performance Outcomes (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved
92214 Page 4
(year) I
1 ELA Student Achievement 83 85 2015
2 Math Student Achievement 88 88 2015
3 Science Student Achievement 79 81 2015
4 ELA Learning Gains 75 pts 78 pts 2015
5 Math Learning Gains 79 pts 80 pts 2015 ~
6 ELA Learning Gains of the Low 25 73 75 2015
7 8
Math Learning Gains of the Low 25 Overall 4-year Graduation Rate
76 NA
71 NA
2015 NA
9 Acceleration Success Rate NA NA NA 10
bull Quality Efficient Services
Technology Infrastructure Districts shall create a digital learning infrastructure with the appropriate levels of bandwidth devices hardware and software
For the infrastructure needs analysis the required data points can and should be pulled from the Technology Readiness Inventory (TRI) if the data is accurate Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate
Infrastructure Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 Student to Computer Device Ratio 3 1 1 1 2017 2 Count of student instructio nal desktop
computers meeting specifications 181 80 2017
3 Count of student instructional mobile computers (laptops) meeting specifications
60 300 2017
4 Count of student web-thin client computers meeting specifications
0 0 2017
5 Count of student large screen tablets meeting specifications
8 50 2017
6 Percent of schools meeting recommended bandwidth standard
0 100 2015
7 Percent of wireless classrooms (80211n or higher)
0 100 2015
Infrastructure Needs Analysis (District Provided)
Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
8 Complete district wide rewiring to CAT6e
92214 Page 5
- currently using CA T3 creating internal 0 100 201512016
9 speed limitations Access layer Switches UPSs to ensure 201512016
network availability and success test 0 100
10 Full Network replacement Core to Access layer all sites with RouterlFirewall 0 100 2015
Enhancements
Skilled Workforce and Economic Development
Professional Development Instructional personnel and staff shall have access to opportunities and training to assist with the integration ofteclmology into classroom teaching
Professional Development should be evaluated based on the level ofcurrent teclmology integration by teachers into classrooms This will measure the impact of the professional development for digital learning into the classrooms The Teclmology Integration Matrix (TIM) can be found at httpfcitusfedulmatrixlmatrixphp Average integration should be recorded as the percent of teachers at each of the 5 categories of the TIM for the levels ofteclmology integration into the classroom curriculum
bull Entry bull Adoption bull Adaptation bull Infusion bull Transformation
Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (Required) Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 A verage Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM
2 Average Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM (Elementary Schools)
-Entry 5 0 2016 -Adoption 60 10 2016 -Adaptation 25 45 2016 -Infusion 8 30 2016 -Transformation 2 15 2017
3 A verage Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (High Schools)
4 Average Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (Combination Schools)
Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (District Provided) Target to be
92214 Page 6
Achieved (year)
5 6 7 8 9
Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here
Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning
Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively
Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses
Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ
in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time
Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to
Partially implemented
Will work to
2016
922114 Page 7
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and
implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
922114 Page 8
technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for
Target to be Achieved
(year)
10 11 12
bull Quality Efficient Services
Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments
Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window
Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (yearl
1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window
2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to
computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be
Achieved (year)
3 4 5
This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years
922114 Page 9
STEP 2 - Goal Setting
Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted
These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals
Goals Examples
EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet
expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for
industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed
bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum
bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students
Enter district goals below
bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school
bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement
bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources
bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning
bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners
STEP 3 - Strategy Setting
Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation
92214 Page 10
Examples of Strategies
EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement
Strategy Supply teachers and students with high
Measurement
bull Purchase Instructional
Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015
quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat
Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing
achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for
bull Integrate instructional
each student materials into system
Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps
supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments
bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms
bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e
bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches
bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016
Enter the district strategies below
Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains
Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field
Bandwidth amount 200Mbps
2014 and ongoing
922114 Page 11
trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I
25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools
I
I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I
certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer
Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-
boarding new grade levels in 2016
To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved
school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device
policyI
To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies
Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc
To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions
aligned to the needs of all learners
In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs
92214 Page 12
Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL
The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to
o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation
o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A
Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)
Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS
92214 Page 13
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
academic support PPCES-FSU focuses on the differentiated needs of every student in every classroom Fidelity and implementation concentrates on accelerating and maximizing student academic achievement through the application ofdata-based problem solving and effective leadership at all levels The Collaborative Problem-Solving Team meets regularly to monitor student progress and evaluate the effectiveness of the student plans in relation to goals PPCES supports the implementation and capacity of the MTSS plan through human and material resources that align to the school achievement goals for all students
Part II DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN -STRATEGY
STEP 1- Need Analysis
Districts should identify current district needs based on student performance outcomes and other key measurable data elements for digital learning
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
bull Highest Student Achievement
Student Performance Outcomes Districts shall improve classroom teaching and learning to enable all students to be digital learners with access to digital tools and resources for the full integration of the Florida Standards
After completing the suggested activities for determining the student performance outcomes described in the DCP guidance document complete the table below with the targeted goals for each school grade component Districts may add additional student performance outcomes as appropriate Examples of additional measures are District Improvement and Assistance Plan (DIAP) goals district Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) andor other goals established in the district strategic plan
Data is required for the metrics listed in the table For the student performance outcomes these data points can and should be pulled from the school and district school grades published at httpschoolgradesf1doeorg Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate below in the table for district provided outcomes
Student Performance Outcomes (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved
92214 Page 4
(year) I
1 ELA Student Achievement 83 85 2015
2 Math Student Achievement 88 88 2015
3 Science Student Achievement 79 81 2015
4 ELA Learning Gains 75 pts 78 pts 2015
5 Math Learning Gains 79 pts 80 pts 2015 ~
6 ELA Learning Gains of the Low 25 73 75 2015
7 8
Math Learning Gains of the Low 25 Overall 4-year Graduation Rate
76 NA
71 NA
2015 NA
9 Acceleration Success Rate NA NA NA 10
bull Quality Efficient Services
Technology Infrastructure Districts shall create a digital learning infrastructure with the appropriate levels of bandwidth devices hardware and software
For the infrastructure needs analysis the required data points can and should be pulled from the Technology Readiness Inventory (TRI) if the data is accurate Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate
Infrastructure Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 Student to Computer Device Ratio 3 1 1 1 2017 2 Count of student instructio nal desktop
computers meeting specifications 181 80 2017
3 Count of student instructional mobile computers (laptops) meeting specifications
60 300 2017
4 Count of student web-thin client computers meeting specifications
0 0 2017
5 Count of student large screen tablets meeting specifications
8 50 2017
6 Percent of schools meeting recommended bandwidth standard
0 100 2015
7 Percent of wireless classrooms (80211n or higher)
0 100 2015
Infrastructure Needs Analysis (District Provided)
Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
8 Complete district wide rewiring to CAT6e
92214 Page 5
- currently using CA T3 creating internal 0 100 201512016
9 speed limitations Access layer Switches UPSs to ensure 201512016
network availability and success test 0 100
10 Full Network replacement Core to Access layer all sites with RouterlFirewall 0 100 2015
Enhancements
Skilled Workforce and Economic Development
Professional Development Instructional personnel and staff shall have access to opportunities and training to assist with the integration ofteclmology into classroom teaching
Professional Development should be evaluated based on the level ofcurrent teclmology integration by teachers into classrooms This will measure the impact of the professional development for digital learning into the classrooms The Teclmology Integration Matrix (TIM) can be found at httpfcitusfedulmatrixlmatrixphp Average integration should be recorded as the percent of teachers at each of the 5 categories of the TIM for the levels ofteclmology integration into the classroom curriculum
bull Entry bull Adoption bull Adaptation bull Infusion bull Transformation
Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (Required) Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 A verage Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM
2 Average Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM (Elementary Schools)
-Entry 5 0 2016 -Adoption 60 10 2016 -Adaptation 25 45 2016 -Infusion 8 30 2016 -Transformation 2 15 2017
3 A verage Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (High Schools)
4 Average Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (Combination Schools)
Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (District Provided) Target to be
92214 Page 6
Achieved (year)
5 6 7 8 9
Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here
Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning
Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively
Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses
Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ
in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time
Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to
Partially implemented
Will work to
2016
922114 Page 7
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and
implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
922114 Page 8
technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for
Target to be Achieved
(year)
10 11 12
bull Quality Efficient Services
Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments
Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window
Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (yearl
1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window
2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to
computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be
Achieved (year)
3 4 5
This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years
922114 Page 9
STEP 2 - Goal Setting
Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted
These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals
Goals Examples
EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet
expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for
industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed
bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum
bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students
Enter district goals below
bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school
bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement
bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources
bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning
bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners
STEP 3 - Strategy Setting
Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation
92214 Page 10
Examples of Strategies
EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement
Strategy Supply teachers and students with high
Measurement
bull Purchase Instructional
Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015
quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat
Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing
achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for
bull Integrate instructional
each student materials into system
Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps
supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments
bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms
bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e
bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches
bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016
Enter the district strategies below
Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains
Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field
Bandwidth amount 200Mbps
2014 and ongoing
922114 Page 11
trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I
25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools
I
I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I
certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer
Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-
boarding new grade levels in 2016
To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved
school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device
policyI
To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies
Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc
To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions
aligned to the needs of all learners
In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs
92214 Page 12
Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL
The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to
o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation
o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A
Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)
Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS
92214 Page 13
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
(year) I
1 ELA Student Achievement 83 85 2015
2 Math Student Achievement 88 88 2015
3 Science Student Achievement 79 81 2015
4 ELA Learning Gains 75 pts 78 pts 2015
5 Math Learning Gains 79 pts 80 pts 2015 ~
6 ELA Learning Gains of the Low 25 73 75 2015
7 8
Math Learning Gains of the Low 25 Overall 4-year Graduation Rate
76 NA
71 NA
2015 NA
9 Acceleration Success Rate NA NA NA 10
bull Quality Efficient Services
Technology Infrastructure Districts shall create a digital learning infrastructure with the appropriate levels of bandwidth devices hardware and software
For the infrastructure needs analysis the required data points can and should be pulled from the Technology Readiness Inventory (TRI) if the data is accurate Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate
Infrastructure Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 Student to Computer Device Ratio 3 1 1 1 2017 2 Count of student instructio nal desktop
computers meeting specifications 181 80 2017
3 Count of student instructional mobile computers (laptops) meeting specifications
60 300 2017
4 Count of student web-thin client computers meeting specifications
0 0 2017
5 Count of student large screen tablets meeting specifications
8 50 2017
6 Percent of schools meeting recommended bandwidth standard
0 100 2015
7 Percent of wireless classrooms (80211n or higher)
0 100 2015
Infrastructure Needs Analysis (District Provided)
Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
8 Complete district wide rewiring to CAT6e
92214 Page 5
- currently using CA T3 creating internal 0 100 201512016
9 speed limitations Access layer Switches UPSs to ensure 201512016
network availability and success test 0 100
10 Full Network replacement Core to Access layer all sites with RouterlFirewall 0 100 2015
Enhancements
Skilled Workforce and Economic Development
Professional Development Instructional personnel and staff shall have access to opportunities and training to assist with the integration ofteclmology into classroom teaching
Professional Development should be evaluated based on the level ofcurrent teclmology integration by teachers into classrooms This will measure the impact of the professional development for digital learning into the classrooms The Teclmology Integration Matrix (TIM) can be found at httpfcitusfedulmatrixlmatrixphp Average integration should be recorded as the percent of teachers at each of the 5 categories of the TIM for the levels ofteclmology integration into the classroom curriculum
bull Entry bull Adoption bull Adaptation bull Infusion bull Transformation
Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (Required) Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 A verage Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM
2 Average Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM (Elementary Schools)
-Entry 5 0 2016 -Adoption 60 10 2016 -Adaptation 25 45 2016 -Infusion 8 30 2016 -Transformation 2 15 2017
3 A verage Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (High Schools)
4 Average Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (Combination Schools)
Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (District Provided) Target to be
92214 Page 6
Achieved (year)
5 6 7 8 9
Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here
Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning
Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively
Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses
Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ
in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time
Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to
Partially implemented
Will work to
2016
922114 Page 7
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and
implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
922114 Page 8
technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for
Target to be Achieved
(year)
10 11 12
bull Quality Efficient Services
Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments
Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window
Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (yearl
1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window
2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to
computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be
Achieved (year)
3 4 5
This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years
922114 Page 9
STEP 2 - Goal Setting
Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted
These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals
Goals Examples
EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet
expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for
industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed
bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum
bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students
Enter district goals below
bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school
bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement
bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources
bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning
bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners
STEP 3 - Strategy Setting
Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation
92214 Page 10
Examples of Strategies
EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement
Strategy Supply teachers and students with high
Measurement
bull Purchase Instructional
Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015
quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat
Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing
achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for
bull Integrate instructional
each student materials into system
Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps
supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments
bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms
bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e
bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches
bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016
Enter the district strategies below
Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains
Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field
Bandwidth amount 200Mbps
2014 and ongoing
922114 Page 11
trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I
25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools
I
I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I
certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer
Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-
boarding new grade levels in 2016
To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved
school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device
policyI
To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies
Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc
To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions
aligned to the needs of all learners
In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs
92214 Page 12
Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL
The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to
o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation
o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A
Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)
Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS
92214 Page 13
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
- currently using CA T3 creating internal 0 100 201512016
9 speed limitations Access layer Switches UPSs to ensure 201512016
network availability and success test 0 100
10 Full Network replacement Core to Access layer all sites with RouterlFirewall 0 100 2015
Enhancements
Skilled Workforce and Economic Development
Professional Development Instructional personnel and staff shall have access to opportunities and training to assist with the integration ofteclmology into classroom teaching
Professional Development should be evaluated based on the level ofcurrent teclmology integration by teachers into classrooms This will measure the impact of the professional development for digital learning into the classrooms The Teclmology Integration Matrix (TIM) can be found at httpfcitusfedulmatrixlmatrixphp Average integration should be recorded as the percent of teachers at each of the 5 categories of the TIM for the levels ofteclmology integration into the classroom curriculum
bull Entry bull Adoption bull Adaptation bull Infusion bull Transformation
Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (Required) Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 A verage Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM
2 Average Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM (Elementary Schools)
-Entry 5 0 2016 -Adoption 60 10 2016 -Adaptation 25 45 2016 -Infusion 8 30 2016 -Transformation 2 15 2017
3 A verage Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (High Schools)
4 Average Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (Combination Schools)
Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (District Provided) Target to be
92214 Page 6
Achieved (year)
5 6 7 8 9
Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here
Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning
Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively
Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses
Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ
in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time
Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to
Partially implemented
Will work to
2016
922114 Page 7
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and
implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
922114 Page 8
technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for
Target to be Achieved
(year)
10 11 12
bull Quality Efficient Services
Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments
Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window
Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (yearl
1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window
2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to
computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be
Achieved (year)
3 4 5
This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years
922114 Page 9
STEP 2 - Goal Setting
Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted
These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals
Goals Examples
EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet
expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for
industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed
bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum
bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students
Enter district goals below
bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school
bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement
bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources
bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning
bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners
STEP 3 - Strategy Setting
Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation
92214 Page 10
Examples of Strategies
EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement
Strategy Supply teachers and students with high
Measurement
bull Purchase Instructional
Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015
quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat
Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing
achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for
bull Integrate instructional
each student materials into system
Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps
supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments
bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms
bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e
bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches
bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016
Enter the district strategies below
Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains
Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field
Bandwidth amount 200Mbps
2014 and ongoing
922114 Page 11
trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I
25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools
I
I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I
certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer
Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-
boarding new grade levels in 2016
To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved
school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device
policyI
To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies
Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc
To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions
aligned to the needs of all learners
In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs
92214 Page 12
Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL
The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to
o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation
o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A
Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)
Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS
92214 Page 13
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
Achieved (year)
5 6 7 8 9
Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here
Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning
Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively
Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses
Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ
in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time
Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (year)
1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to
Partially implemented
Will work to
2016
922114 Page 7
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and
implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
922114 Page 8
technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for
Target to be Achieved
(year)
10 11 12
bull Quality Efficient Services
Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments
Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window
Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (yearl
1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window
2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to
computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be
Achieved (year)
3 4 5
This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years
922114 Page 9
STEP 2 - Goal Setting
Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted
These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals
Goals Examples
EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet
expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for
industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed
bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum
bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students
Enter district goals below
bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school
bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement
bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources
bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning
bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners
STEP 3 - Strategy Setting
Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation
92214 Page 10
Examples of Strategies
EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement
Strategy Supply teachers and students with high
Measurement
bull Purchase Instructional
Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015
quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat
Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing
achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for
bull Integrate instructional
each student materials into system
Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps
supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments
bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms
bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e
bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches
bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016
Enter the district strategies below
Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains
Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field
Bandwidth amount 200Mbps
2014 and ongoing
922114 Page 11
trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I
25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools
I
I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I
certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer
Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-
boarding new grade levels in 2016
To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved
school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device
policyI
To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies
Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc
To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions
aligned to the needs of all learners
In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs
92214 Page 12
Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL
The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to
o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation
o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A
Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)
Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS
92214 Page 13
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and
implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
Will work 2016 to implement and employ
922114 Page 8
technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for
Target to be Achieved
(year)
10 11 12
bull Quality Efficient Services
Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments
Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window
Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (yearl
1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window
2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to
computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be
Achieved (year)
3 4 5
This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years
922114 Page 9
STEP 2 - Goal Setting
Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted
These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals
Goals Examples
EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet
expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for
industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed
bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum
bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students
Enter district goals below
bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school
bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement
bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources
bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning
bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners
STEP 3 - Strategy Setting
Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation
92214 Page 10
Examples of Strategies
EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement
Strategy Supply teachers and students with high
Measurement
bull Purchase Instructional
Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015
quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat
Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing
achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for
bull Integrate instructional
each student materials into system
Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps
supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments
bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms
bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e
bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches
bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016
Enter the district strategies below
Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains
Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field
Bandwidth amount 200Mbps
2014 and ongoing
922114 Page 11
trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I
25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools
I
I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I
certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer
Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-
boarding new grade levels in 2016
To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved
school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device
policyI
To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies
Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc
To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions
aligned to the needs of all learners
In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs
92214 Page 12
Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL
The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to
o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation
o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A
Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)
Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS
92214 Page 13
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for
Target to be Achieved
(year)
10 11 12
bull Quality Efficient Services
Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments
Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window
Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be
Achieved (yearl
1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window
2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to
computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be
Achieved (year)
3 4 5
This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years
922114 Page 9
STEP 2 - Goal Setting
Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted
These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals
Goals Examples
EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet
expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for
industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed
bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum
bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students
Enter district goals below
bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school
bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement
bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources
bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning
bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners
STEP 3 - Strategy Setting
Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation
92214 Page 10
Examples of Strategies
EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement
Strategy Supply teachers and students with high
Measurement
bull Purchase Instructional
Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015
quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat
Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing
achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for
bull Integrate instructional
each student materials into system
Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps
supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments
bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms
bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e
bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches
bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016
Enter the district strategies below
Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains
Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field
Bandwidth amount 200Mbps
2014 and ongoing
922114 Page 11
trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I
25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools
I
I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I
certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer
Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-
boarding new grade levels in 2016
To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved
school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device
policyI
To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies
Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc
To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions
aligned to the needs of all learners
In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs
92214 Page 12
Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL
The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to
o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation
o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A
Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)
Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS
92214 Page 13
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
STEP 2 - Goal Setting
Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted
These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals
Goals Examples
EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet
expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for
industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed
bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum
bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students
Enter district goals below
bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school
bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement
bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources
bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning
bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners
STEP 3 - Strategy Setting
Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation
92214 Page 10
Examples of Strategies
EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement
Strategy Supply teachers and students with high
Measurement
bull Purchase Instructional
Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015
quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat
Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing
achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for
bull Integrate instructional
each student materials into system
Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps
supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments
bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms
bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e
bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches
bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016
Enter the district strategies below
Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains
Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field
Bandwidth amount 200Mbps
2014 and ongoing
922114 Page 11
trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I
25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools
I
I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I
certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer
Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-
boarding new grade levels in 2016
To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved
school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device
policyI
To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies
Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc
To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions
aligned to the needs of all learners
In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs
92214 Page 12
Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL
The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to
o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation
o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A
Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)
Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS
92214 Page 13
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
Examples of Strategies
EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement
Strategy Supply teachers and students with high
Measurement
bull Purchase Instructional
Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015
quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat
Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing
achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for
bull Integrate instructional
each student materials into system
Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps
supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments
bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms
bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e
bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches
bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016
Enter the district strategies below
Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains
Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field
Bandwidth amount 200Mbps
2014 and ongoing
922114 Page 11
trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I
25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools
I
I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I
certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer
Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-
boarding new grade levels in 2016
To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved
school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device
policyI
To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies
Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc
To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions
aligned to the needs of all learners
In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs
92214 Page 12
Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL
The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to
o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation
o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A
Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)
Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS
92214 Page 13
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I
25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools
I
I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I
certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer
Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-
boarding new grade levels in 2016
To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved
school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device
policyI
To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies
Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc
To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions
aligned to the needs of all learners
In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs
92214 Page 12
Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL
The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to
o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation
o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A
Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)
Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS
92214 Page 13
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL
The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are
A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments
This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to
o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation
o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A
Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)
Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS
92214 Page 13
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year
EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target
1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school
45 48
2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1
78 80
Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below
Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing
25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78
2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics
79 80
3 4 5
92214 Page 14
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments
Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
BX
Purchase and implement wireless access points
May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
BX I
Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices
February 2015
$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school
Outcome Example 1
Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router
082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward B2 Purchase and implement
new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy
FSUFSUS Outcome and 2
1
Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1
I FSUFSUS Broward
and 2
BA Network Access
Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome and 2
1
Broward
92214 Page 15
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)
Success Criteria
Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)
After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)
After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the
92214 Page 16
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data
Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP
State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address
bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices
These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning
Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed
Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development
The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning
EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning
May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School
Outcome Example 2
I Professional Development Implementation
92214 Page 17
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
c1
Deliverable
45 elementary school teachers and support staff
Estimated Completion Date
May 2015
Estimated Cost
$10000
School District
PPCESshyFSUFSUS
Outcome from Section A)
Outcome 1 I and 2
participate In professional Broward development aligned with
C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional
May 2015 and ongoing
$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome and 2
1
Learning Communities digital learning
on
I
1 I
C3 C4
If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities I Other funding source
I I
Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)
Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)
Success Criteria
C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015
After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
C3 C4
92214 Page 18
I
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance
Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here
Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools
EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system
September 2014
$X Sunshine Elementary school
Example Outcome 1
DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list
2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines
2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras
2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)
2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
92214 Page 19
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
I
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities
Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria
(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices
Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be
measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices
Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration
Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices
purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
92214 Page 20
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~
- - -- --- -
Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables
Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments
EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation
Deliverable Estimated Completion Date
Estimated Cost School Di strict
Outcome from Section A)
Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows
September 2014
I
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments
February 2015
$X Sandy Shores High School
Example Outcome 2
Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated
Completion Date
Estimated Cost School District
Outcome from Section A)
E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments
August 2017
$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward
Outcome 1 and 2
E2 E3 E4
Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources
Brief description of other activities Other funding source
92214 Page 21
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22
~----------------------------- -- ---- shy
Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments
Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise
I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and
(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student
devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015
E2
Success Criteria
After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data
E3 I E4 I
922114 Page 22