22
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.---- - 0 U A ________ f1 doe.org DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN The intent of the District Digital Classroom Plan (DCP) is to provide a perspective on what the district considers being vital and critically important in relation digital learning implementation, the improvement of student performance outcomes, and how this progress will be measured. The plan shall meet the unique needs of students, schools and personnel in the district as required by s.1011.62(l2)(b), F.S. Part I. DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - OVERVIEW The District's overview component of the plan should document the district's overall focus and direction with respect to how the incorporation and integration of technology into the educational program will improve student performance outcomes. The general introductionibackgroundiDistrict technology policies component of the plan should include, but not be limited to: 1.1 District Mission and Vision statements - Our Vision The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School will develop and enhance students' technological skills and abilities. Our Mission The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School is dedicated to empowering students by infusing technology within a learning environment. 1.2 District Profile - Provide relevant social, economic, geographic and demographic factors influencing the district's implementation oftechnology. The FSUS-Broward district consists of one developmental research (lab) school sponsored by Florida State University. The city of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School (PPCES-FSU), which is located in Broward County, Florida, is part ofthe Pembroke Pines Charter School system. The demographic data ofPPCES-FSU students closely mirrors that of the state. The population is comprised of Whites (32%), African-Americans (33%), Hispanics (33%), and Asians (2%). PPCES-FSU is a high-performing school that achieves academic excellence by actively invo lving parents and community members through an active PTA board, committees, volunteerism, an interactive website, and televised City Commission meetings. The school uses disaggregated data and stakeholder surveys to make data-driven decisions to implement current technologies and digital resources throughout the school. Policies and

1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF1_---IIIIIIiIIII---- - 0 U A ________ f1doeorg

bull

DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN

The intent of the District Digital Classroom Plan (DCP) is to provide a perspective on what the district considers being vital and critically important in relation digital learning implementation the improvement of student performance outcomes and how this progress will be measured The plan shall meet the unique needs of students schools and personnel in the district as required by s101162(l2)(b) FS

Part I DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - OVERVIEW

The Districts overview component of the plan should document the districts overall focus and direction with respect to how the incorporation and integration of technology into the educational program will improve student performance outcomes

The general introductionibackgroundiDistrict technology policies component of the plan should include but not be limited to

11 District Mission and Vision statements shy

Our Vision

The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School will develop and enhance students technological skills and abilities

Our Mission

The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School is dedicated to empowering students by infusing technology within a learning environment

12 District Profile - Provide relevant social economic geographic and demographic factors influencing the districts implementation oftechnology

The FSUS-Broward district consists ofone developmental research (lab) school sponsored by Florida State University The city ofPembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School (PPCES-FSU) which is located in Broward County Florida is part ofthe Pembroke Pines Charter School system The demographic data ofPPCES-FSU students closely mirrors that of the state The population is comprised ofWhites (32) African-Americans (33) Hispanics (33) and Asians (2)

PPCES-FSU is a high-performing school that achieves academic excellence by actively invo lving parents and community members through an active PTA board committees volunteerism an interactive website and televised City Commission meetings

The school uses disaggregated data and stakeholder surveys to make data-driven decisions to implement current technologies and digital resources throughout the school Policies and

procedures are continuously developed by the school systems technology team to support schools and teacher preparation programs These programs are designed for the effective implementation of techno logy in order to meet curriculum and learning technology standards ensure organizational effectiveness and enhance student performance

The City of Pembroke Pines Florida State University Charter Elementary School is dedicated fiber to high speed internet service provider Internet access is provisioned via 100 mbps MetroshyEthernet Internet uplink Wireless access is provided via 10 Ruckus access points throughout all classrooms The network supports 181 PCs 60 laptops and 8 tablets for staff and student use

Authentication and fileprint servers are located at each campus All schools access centralized services at the data center located at the City ofPembroke Pines Charter Academic Village Campus Centralized services include district databases Internet filtering web hosting and various educational programs Other servers host infrastructure management services like patch management anti-virus updates and desktop software deployment services

Google Applications for Education provide communication collaboration and publishing services to all staff and any students that require it The system also has access to a variety of cloud- based educational programs including Renaissance Place and Think Central

Equal access to technology will provide staff and students with the tools needed to maximize the learning environment and is critical to ensuring the success ofall students To that end PPCES engages in a constant cycle of planning implementation and reassessing the curriculum to ensure that students will be able to fully utilize technology as a learning tool

13 District Team Profile - Provide the following contact information for each member of the district team participating in the DCP planning process The individuals that participated should include but not be limited to

o the digital learning components should be completed with collaboration between district instructional curriculum and information technology staff as required in s101162(12)(b) FS

o development of partnerships with community business and industry and o integration of technology in all areas of the curriculum ESOL and special needs

including students with disabilities

TitlelRole Name EmailPhone Information Technology District Michael Lockett mJockettIminescom Contact 9544356517 Curriculum District Contact Judith Founds jfoundspinescharternet

9544994244 Instructional District Contact NA NA

Finance District Contact Aner Gonzalez agonzalezm~inescom

9544314884 District Leadership Contact Dr Lisa Libidinsky llibidinskvragtninescharternet

92214 Page 2

I 9544994244

14 Planning Process- Summarize the process used to write this plan including but not limited to

o how parents school staff and others were involved o development of partnerships with community business and industry and o integration of technology in all areas of the curriculum ESOL and special needs

including students with disabilities

PPCES-FSUs teclmology plan reflects the districts overall Strategic Plan As part of the Strategic Plan the teclmology supports the curriculum goals of the school and promotes meaningful engaged learning for all students It is a tool for improving and transforming teaching and learning and providing for needed professional development and support The plan further responds to the flexibility to change

Through collaboration and communication school administrators teacher leaders parents students and other stakeholders convened to review and update existing teclmology goals Results ofstakeholder climate surveys needs assessments professional development and student data were analyzed in the development of this plan Student data included Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) that were analyzed by subgroup to determine the instructional and teclmology that would inspire transformational change within the classroom Goals directly addressed the needs of the entire student body including ESOL and ESE students After the teclmology team generated a collective vision for implementation the governing board city officials and community leaders reviewed and provided recommendations for the development approval of this plan

The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School has partnerships with local business organizations Through the support ofthese partnerships the school has been able to raise funds and elicit feedback needed to enrich the integration of technology

The plan was written for a three year period however is reviewed each year during the budget to make sure the school is addressing the most current equipment and is taking advantage of new and lower cost technology

15 Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)- Summarize the process used to write this plan including but not limited to

o data-based problem-solving process used for the goals and need analysis established in the plan

o the systems in place to monitor progress of the implementation plans and o the plan to support the implementation and capacity

The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School adopted Broward Countys MTSS plan To achieve the goal of providing every student with focused

92214 Page 3

academic support PPCES-FSU focuses on the differentiated needs of every student in every classroom Fidelity and implementation concentrates on accelerating and maximizing student academic achievement through the application ofdata-based problem solving and effective leadership at all levels The Collaborative Problem-Solving Team meets regularly to monitor student progress and evaluate the effectiveness of the student plans in relation to goals PPCES supports the implementation and capacity of the MTSS plan through human and material resources that align to the school achievement goals for all students

Part II DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN -STRATEGY

STEP 1- Need Analysis

Districts should identify current district needs based on student performance outcomes and other key measurable data elements for digital learning

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

bull Highest Student Achievement

Student Performance Outcomes Districts shall improve classroom teaching and learning to enable all students to be digital learners with access to digital tools and resources for the full integration of the Florida Standards

After completing the suggested activities for determining the student performance outcomes described in the DCP guidance document complete the table below with the targeted goals for each school grade component Districts may add additional student performance outcomes as appropriate Examples of additional measures are District Improvement and Assistance Plan (DIAP) goals district Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) andor other goals established in the district strategic plan

Data is required for the metrics listed in the table For the student performance outcomes these data points can and should be pulled from the school and district school grades published at httpschoolgradesf1doeorg Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate below in the table for district provided outcomes

Student Performance Outcomes (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved

92214 Page 4

(year) I

1 ELA Student Achievement 83 85 2015

2 Math Student Achievement 88 88 2015

3 Science Student Achievement 79 81 2015

4 ELA Learning Gains 75 pts 78 pts 2015

5 Math Learning Gains 79 pts 80 pts 2015 ~

6 ELA Learning Gains of the Low 25 73 75 2015

7 8

Math Learning Gains of the Low 25 Overall 4-year Graduation Rate

76 NA

71 NA

2015 NA

9 Acceleration Success Rate NA NA NA 10

bull Quality Efficient Services

Technology Infrastructure Districts shall create a digital learning infrastructure with the appropriate levels of bandwidth devices hardware and software

For the infrastructure needs analysis the required data points can and should be pulled from the Technology Readiness Inventory (TRI) if the data is accurate Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate

Infrastructure Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 Student to Computer Device Ratio 3 1 1 1 2017 2 Count of student instructio nal desktop

computers meeting specifications 181 80 2017

3 Count of student instructional mobile computers (laptops) meeting specifications

60 300 2017

4 Count of student web-thin client computers meeting specifications

0 0 2017

5 Count of student large screen tablets meeting specifications

8 50 2017

6 Percent of schools meeting recommended bandwidth standard

0 100 2015

7 Percent of wireless classrooms (80211n or higher)

0 100 2015

Infrastructure Needs Analysis (District Provided)

Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

8 Complete district wide rewiring to CAT6e

92214 Page 5

- currently using CA T3 creating internal 0 100 201512016

9 speed limitations Access layer Switches UPSs to ensure 201512016

network availability and success test 0 100

10 Full Network replacement Core to Access layer all sites with RouterlFirewall 0 100 2015

Enhancements

Skilled Workforce and Economic Development

Professional Development Instructional personnel and staff shall have access to opportunities and training to assist with the integration ofteclmology into classroom teaching

Professional Development should be evaluated based on the level ofcurrent teclmology integration by teachers into classrooms This will measure the impact of the professional development for digital learning into the classrooms The Teclmology Integration Matrix (TIM) can be found at httpfcitusfedulmatrixlmatrixphp Average integration should be recorded as the percent of teachers at each of the 5 categories of the TIM for the levels ofteclmology integration into the classroom curriculum

bull Entry bull Adoption bull Adaptation bull Infusion bull Transformation

Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (Required) Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 A verage Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM

2 Average Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM (Elementary Schools)

-Entry 5 0 2016 -Adoption 60 10 2016 -Adaptation 25 45 2016 -Infusion 8 30 2016 -Transformation 2 15 2017

3 A verage Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (High Schools)

4 Average Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (Combination Schools)

Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (District Provided) Target to be

92214 Page 6

Achieved (year)

5 6 7 8 9

Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here

Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning

Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively

Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses

Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ

in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time

Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to

Partially implemented

Will work to

2016

922114 Page 7

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and

implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

922114 Page 8

technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for

Target to be Achieved

(year)

10 11 12

bull Quality Efficient Services

Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments

Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window

Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (yearl

1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window

2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to

computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be

Achieved (year)

3 4 5

This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years

922114 Page 9

STEP 2 - Goal Setting

Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted

These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals

Goals Examples

EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet

expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for

industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed

bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum

bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students

Enter district goals below

bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school

bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement

bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources

bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning

bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners

STEP 3 - Strategy Setting

Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation

92214 Page 10

Examples of Strategies

EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement

Strategy Supply teachers and students with high

Measurement

bull Purchase Instructional

Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015

quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat

Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing

achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for

bull Integrate instructional

each student materials into system

Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps

supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments

bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms

bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e

bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches

bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016

Enter the district strategies below

Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains

Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field

Bandwidth amount 200Mbps

2014 and ongoing

922114 Page 11

trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I

25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools

I

I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I

certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer

Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-

boarding new grade levels in 2016

To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved

school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device

policyI

To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies

Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc

To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions

aligned to the needs of all learners

In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs

92214 Page 12

Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to

o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation

o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A

Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)

Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS

92214 Page 13

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 2: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

procedures are continuously developed by the school systems technology team to support schools and teacher preparation programs These programs are designed for the effective implementation of techno logy in order to meet curriculum and learning technology standards ensure organizational effectiveness and enhance student performance

The City of Pembroke Pines Florida State University Charter Elementary School is dedicated fiber to high speed internet service provider Internet access is provisioned via 100 mbps MetroshyEthernet Internet uplink Wireless access is provided via 10 Ruckus access points throughout all classrooms The network supports 181 PCs 60 laptops and 8 tablets for staff and student use

Authentication and fileprint servers are located at each campus All schools access centralized services at the data center located at the City ofPembroke Pines Charter Academic Village Campus Centralized services include district databases Internet filtering web hosting and various educational programs Other servers host infrastructure management services like patch management anti-virus updates and desktop software deployment services

Google Applications for Education provide communication collaboration and publishing services to all staff and any students that require it The system also has access to a variety of cloud- based educational programs including Renaissance Place and Think Central

Equal access to technology will provide staff and students with the tools needed to maximize the learning environment and is critical to ensuring the success ofall students To that end PPCES engages in a constant cycle of planning implementation and reassessing the curriculum to ensure that students will be able to fully utilize technology as a learning tool

13 District Team Profile - Provide the following contact information for each member of the district team participating in the DCP planning process The individuals that participated should include but not be limited to

o the digital learning components should be completed with collaboration between district instructional curriculum and information technology staff as required in s101162(12)(b) FS

o development of partnerships with community business and industry and o integration of technology in all areas of the curriculum ESOL and special needs

including students with disabilities

TitlelRole Name EmailPhone Information Technology District Michael Lockett mJockettIminescom Contact 9544356517 Curriculum District Contact Judith Founds jfoundspinescharternet

9544994244 Instructional District Contact NA NA

Finance District Contact Aner Gonzalez agonzalezm~inescom

9544314884 District Leadership Contact Dr Lisa Libidinsky llibidinskvragtninescharternet

92214 Page 2

I 9544994244

14 Planning Process- Summarize the process used to write this plan including but not limited to

o how parents school staff and others were involved o development of partnerships with community business and industry and o integration of technology in all areas of the curriculum ESOL and special needs

including students with disabilities

PPCES-FSUs teclmology plan reflects the districts overall Strategic Plan As part of the Strategic Plan the teclmology supports the curriculum goals of the school and promotes meaningful engaged learning for all students It is a tool for improving and transforming teaching and learning and providing for needed professional development and support The plan further responds to the flexibility to change

Through collaboration and communication school administrators teacher leaders parents students and other stakeholders convened to review and update existing teclmology goals Results ofstakeholder climate surveys needs assessments professional development and student data were analyzed in the development of this plan Student data included Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) that were analyzed by subgroup to determine the instructional and teclmology that would inspire transformational change within the classroom Goals directly addressed the needs of the entire student body including ESOL and ESE students After the teclmology team generated a collective vision for implementation the governing board city officials and community leaders reviewed and provided recommendations for the development approval of this plan

The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School has partnerships with local business organizations Through the support ofthese partnerships the school has been able to raise funds and elicit feedback needed to enrich the integration of technology

The plan was written for a three year period however is reviewed each year during the budget to make sure the school is addressing the most current equipment and is taking advantage of new and lower cost technology

15 Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)- Summarize the process used to write this plan including but not limited to

o data-based problem-solving process used for the goals and need analysis established in the plan

o the systems in place to monitor progress of the implementation plans and o the plan to support the implementation and capacity

The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School adopted Broward Countys MTSS plan To achieve the goal of providing every student with focused

92214 Page 3

academic support PPCES-FSU focuses on the differentiated needs of every student in every classroom Fidelity and implementation concentrates on accelerating and maximizing student academic achievement through the application ofdata-based problem solving and effective leadership at all levels The Collaborative Problem-Solving Team meets regularly to monitor student progress and evaluate the effectiveness of the student plans in relation to goals PPCES supports the implementation and capacity of the MTSS plan through human and material resources that align to the school achievement goals for all students

Part II DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN -STRATEGY

STEP 1- Need Analysis

Districts should identify current district needs based on student performance outcomes and other key measurable data elements for digital learning

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

bull Highest Student Achievement

Student Performance Outcomes Districts shall improve classroom teaching and learning to enable all students to be digital learners with access to digital tools and resources for the full integration of the Florida Standards

After completing the suggested activities for determining the student performance outcomes described in the DCP guidance document complete the table below with the targeted goals for each school grade component Districts may add additional student performance outcomes as appropriate Examples of additional measures are District Improvement and Assistance Plan (DIAP) goals district Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) andor other goals established in the district strategic plan

Data is required for the metrics listed in the table For the student performance outcomes these data points can and should be pulled from the school and district school grades published at httpschoolgradesf1doeorg Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate below in the table for district provided outcomes

Student Performance Outcomes (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved

92214 Page 4

(year) I

1 ELA Student Achievement 83 85 2015

2 Math Student Achievement 88 88 2015

3 Science Student Achievement 79 81 2015

4 ELA Learning Gains 75 pts 78 pts 2015

5 Math Learning Gains 79 pts 80 pts 2015 ~

6 ELA Learning Gains of the Low 25 73 75 2015

7 8

Math Learning Gains of the Low 25 Overall 4-year Graduation Rate

76 NA

71 NA

2015 NA

9 Acceleration Success Rate NA NA NA 10

bull Quality Efficient Services

Technology Infrastructure Districts shall create a digital learning infrastructure with the appropriate levels of bandwidth devices hardware and software

For the infrastructure needs analysis the required data points can and should be pulled from the Technology Readiness Inventory (TRI) if the data is accurate Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate

Infrastructure Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 Student to Computer Device Ratio 3 1 1 1 2017 2 Count of student instructio nal desktop

computers meeting specifications 181 80 2017

3 Count of student instructional mobile computers (laptops) meeting specifications

60 300 2017

4 Count of student web-thin client computers meeting specifications

0 0 2017

5 Count of student large screen tablets meeting specifications

8 50 2017

6 Percent of schools meeting recommended bandwidth standard

0 100 2015

7 Percent of wireless classrooms (80211n or higher)

0 100 2015

Infrastructure Needs Analysis (District Provided)

Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

8 Complete district wide rewiring to CAT6e

92214 Page 5

- currently using CA T3 creating internal 0 100 201512016

9 speed limitations Access layer Switches UPSs to ensure 201512016

network availability and success test 0 100

10 Full Network replacement Core to Access layer all sites with RouterlFirewall 0 100 2015

Enhancements

Skilled Workforce and Economic Development

Professional Development Instructional personnel and staff shall have access to opportunities and training to assist with the integration ofteclmology into classroom teaching

Professional Development should be evaluated based on the level ofcurrent teclmology integration by teachers into classrooms This will measure the impact of the professional development for digital learning into the classrooms The Teclmology Integration Matrix (TIM) can be found at httpfcitusfedulmatrixlmatrixphp Average integration should be recorded as the percent of teachers at each of the 5 categories of the TIM for the levels ofteclmology integration into the classroom curriculum

bull Entry bull Adoption bull Adaptation bull Infusion bull Transformation

Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (Required) Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 A verage Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM

2 Average Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM (Elementary Schools)

-Entry 5 0 2016 -Adoption 60 10 2016 -Adaptation 25 45 2016 -Infusion 8 30 2016 -Transformation 2 15 2017

3 A verage Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (High Schools)

4 Average Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (Combination Schools)

Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (District Provided) Target to be

92214 Page 6

Achieved (year)

5 6 7 8 9

Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here

Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning

Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively

Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses

Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ

in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time

Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to

Partially implemented

Will work to

2016

922114 Page 7

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and

implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

922114 Page 8

technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for

Target to be Achieved

(year)

10 11 12

bull Quality Efficient Services

Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments

Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window

Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (yearl

1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window

2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to

computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be

Achieved (year)

3 4 5

This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years

922114 Page 9

STEP 2 - Goal Setting

Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted

These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals

Goals Examples

EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet

expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for

industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed

bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum

bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students

Enter district goals below

bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school

bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement

bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources

bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning

bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners

STEP 3 - Strategy Setting

Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation

92214 Page 10

Examples of Strategies

EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement

Strategy Supply teachers and students with high

Measurement

bull Purchase Instructional

Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015

quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat

Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing

achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for

bull Integrate instructional

each student materials into system

Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps

supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments

bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms

bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e

bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches

bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016

Enter the district strategies below

Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains

Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field

Bandwidth amount 200Mbps

2014 and ongoing

922114 Page 11

trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I

25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools

I

I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I

certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer

Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-

boarding new grade levels in 2016

To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved

school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device

policyI

To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies

Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc

To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions

aligned to the needs of all learners

In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs

92214 Page 12

Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to

o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation

o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A

Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)

Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS

92214 Page 13

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 3: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

I 9544994244

14 Planning Process- Summarize the process used to write this plan including but not limited to

o how parents school staff and others were involved o development of partnerships with community business and industry and o integration of technology in all areas of the curriculum ESOL and special needs

including students with disabilities

PPCES-FSUs teclmology plan reflects the districts overall Strategic Plan As part of the Strategic Plan the teclmology supports the curriculum goals of the school and promotes meaningful engaged learning for all students It is a tool for improving and transforming teaching and learning and providing for needed professional development and support The plan further responds to the flexibility to change

Through collaboration and communication school administrators teacher leaders parents students and other stakeholders convened to review and update existing teclmology goals Results ofstakeholder climate surveys needs assessments professional development and student data were analyzed in the development of this plan Student data included Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) that were analyzed by subgroup to determine the instructional and teclmology that would inspire transformational change within the classroom Goals directly addressed the needs of the entire student body including ESOL and ESE students After the teclmology team generated a collective vision for implementation the governing board city officials and community leaders reviewed and provided recommendations for the development approval of this plan

The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School has partnerships with local business organizations Through the support ofthese partnerships the school has been able to raise funds and elicit feedback needed to enrich the integration of technology

The plan was written for a three year period however is reviewed each year during the budget to make sure the school is addressing the most current equipment and is taking advantage of new and lower cost technology

15 Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)- Summarize the process used to write this plan including but not limited to

o data-based problem-solving process used for the goals and need analysis established in the plan

o the systems in place to monitor progress of the implementation plans and o the plan to support the implementation and capacity

The City of Pembroke Pines-Florida State University Charter Elementary School adopted Broward Countys MTSS plan To achieve the goal of providing every student with focused

92214 Page 3

academic support PPCES-FSU focuses on the differentiated needs of every student in every classroom Fidelity and implementation concentrates on accelerating and maximizing student academic achievement through the application ofdata-based problem solving and effective leadership at all levels The Collaborative Problem-Solving Team meets regularly to monitor student progress and evaluate the effectiveness of the student plans in relation to goals PPCES supports the implementation and capacity of the MTSS plan through human and material resources that align to the school achievement goals for all students

Part II DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN -STRATEGY

STEP 1- Need Analysis

Districts should identify current district needs based on student performance outcomes and other key measurable data elements for digital learning

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

bull Highest Student Achievement

Student Performance Outcomes Districts shall improve classroom teaching and learning to enable all students to be digital learners with access to digital tools and resources for the full integration of the Florida Standards

After completing the suggested activities for determining the student performance outcomes described in the DCP guidance document complete the table below with the targeted goals for each school grade component Districts may add additional student performance outcomes as appropriate Examples of additional measures are District Improvement and Assistance Plan (DIAP) goals district Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) andor other goals established in the district strategic plan

Data is required for the metrics listed in the table For the student performance outcomes these data points can and should be pulled from the school and district school grades published at httpschoolgradesf1doeorg Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate below in the table for district provided outcomes

Student Performance Outcomes (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved

92214 Page 4

(year) I

1 ELA Student Achievement 83 85 2015

2 Math Student Achievement 88 88 2015

3 Science Student Achievement 79 81 2015

4 ELA Learning Gains 75 pts 78 pts 2015

5 Math Learning Gains 79 pts 80 pts 2015 ~

6 ELA Learning Gains of the Low 25 73 75 2015

7 8

Math Learning Gains of the Low 25 Overall 4-year Graduation Rate

76 NA

71 NA

2015 NA

9 Acceleration Success Rate NA NA NA 10

bull Quality Efficient Services

Technology Infrastructure Districts shall create a digital learning infrastructure with the appropriate levels of bandwidth devices hardware and software

For the infrastructure needs analysis the required data points can and should be pulled from the Technology Readiness Inventory (TRI) if the data is accurate Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate

Infrastructure Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 Student to Computer Device Ratio 3 1 1 1 2017 2 Count of student instructio nal desktop

computers meeting specifications 181 80 2017

3 Count of student instructional mobile computers (laptops) meeting specifications

60 300 2017

4 Count of student web-thin client computers meeting specifications

0 0 2017

5 Count of student large screen tablets meeting specifications

8 50 2017

6 Percent of schools meeting recommended bandwidth standard

0 100 2015

7 Percent of wireless classrooms (80211n or higher)

0 100 2015

Infrastructure Needs Analysis (District Provided)

Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

8 Complete district wide rewiring to CAT6e

92214 Page 5

- currently using CA T3 creating internal 0 100 201512016

9 speed limitations Access layer Switches UPSs to ensure 201512016

network availability and success test 0 100

10 Full Network replacement Core to Access layer all sites with RouterlFirewall 0 100 2015

Enhancements

Skilled Workforce and Economic Development

Professional Development Instructional personnel and staff shall have access to opportunities and training to assist with the integration ofteclmology into classroom teaching

Professional Development should be evaluated based on the level ofcurrent teclmology integration by teachers into classrooms This will measure the impact of the professional development for digital learning into the classrooms The Teclmology Integration Matrix (TIM) can be found at httpfcitusfedulmatrixlmatrixphp Average integration should be recorded as the percent of teachers at each of the 5 categories of the TIM for the levels ofteclmology integration into the classroom curriculum

bull Entry bull Adoption bull Adaptation bull Infusion bull Transformation

Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (Required) Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 A verage Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM

2 Average Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM (Elementary Schools)

-Entry 5 0 2016 -Adoption 60 10 2016 -Adaptation 25 45 2016 -Infusion 8 30 2016 -Transformation 2 15 2017

3 A verage Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (High Schools)

4 Average Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (Combination Schools)

Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (District Provided) Target to be

92214 Page 6

Achieved (year)

5 6 7 8 9

Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here

Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning

Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively

Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses

Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ

in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time

Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to

Partially implemented

Will work to

2016

922114 Page 7

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and

implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

922114 Page 8

technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for

Target to be Achieved

(year)

10 11 12

bull Quality Efficient Services

Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments

Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window

Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (yearl

1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window

2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to

computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be

Achieved (year)

3 4 5

This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years

922114 Page 9

STEP 2 - Goal Setting

Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted

These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals

Goals Examples

EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet

expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for

industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed

bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum

bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students

Enter district goals below

bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school

bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement

bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources

bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning

bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners

STEP 3 - Strategy Setting

Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation

92214 Page 10

Examples of Strategies

EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement

Strategy Supply teachers and students with high

Measurement

bull Purchase Instructional

Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015

quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat

Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing

achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for

bull Integrate instructional

each student materials into system

Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps

supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments

bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms

bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e

bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches

bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016

Enter the district strategies below

Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains

Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field

Bandwidth amount 200Mbps

2014 and ongoing

922114 Page 11

trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I

25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools

I

I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I

certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer

Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-

boarding new grade levels in 2016

To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved

school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device

policyI

To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies

Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc

To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions

aligned to the needs of all learners

In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs

92214 Page 12

Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to

o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation

o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A

Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)

Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS

92214 Page 13

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 4: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

academic support PPCES-FSU focuses on the differentiated needs of every student in every classroom Fidelity and implementation concentrates on accelerating and maximizing student academic achievement through the application ofdata-based problem solving and effective leadership at all levels The Collaborative Problem-Solving Team meets regularly to monitor student progress and evaluate the effectiveness of the student plans in relation to goals PPCES supports the implementation and capacity of the MTSS plan through human and material resources that align to the school achievement goals for all students

Part II DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN -STRATEGY

STEP 1- Need Analysis

Districts should identify current district needs based on student performance outcomes and other key measurable data elements for digital learning

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

bull Highest Student Achievement

Student Performance Outcomes Districts shall improve classroom teaching and learning to enable all students to be digital learners with access to digital tools and resources for the full integration of the Florida Standards

After completing the suggested activities for determining the student performance outcomes described in the DCP guidance document complete the table below with the targeted goals for each school grade component Districts may add additional student performance outcomes as appropriate Examples of additional measures are District Improvement and Assistance Plan (DIAP) goals district Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) andor other goals established in the district strategic plan

Data is required for the metrics listed in the table For the student performance outcomes these data points can and should be pulled from the school and district school grades published at httpschoolgradesf1doeorg Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate below in the table for district provided outcomes

Student Performance Outcomes (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved

92214 Page 4

(year) I

1 ELA Student Achievement 83 85 2015

2 Math Student Achievement 88 88 2015

3 Science Student Achievement 79 81 2015

4 ELA Learning Gains 75 pts 78 pts 2015

5 Math Learning Gains 79 pts 80 pts 2015 ~

6 ELA Learning Gains of the Low 25 73 75 2015

7 8

Math Learning Gains of the Low 25 Overall 4-year Graduation Rate

76 NA

71 NA

2015 NA

9 Acceleration Success Rate NA NA NA 10

bull Quality Efficient Services

Technology Infrastructure Districts shall create a digital learning infrastructure with the appropriate levels of bandwidth devices hardware and software

For the infrastructure needs analysis the required data points can and should be pulled from the Technology Readiness Inventory (TRI) if the data is accurate Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate

Infrastructure Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 Student to Computer Device Ratio 3 1 1 1 2017 2 Count of student instructio nal desktop

computers meeting specifications 181 80 2017

3 Count of student instructional mobile computers (laptops) meeting specifications

60 300 2017

4 Count of student web-thin client computers meeting specifications

0 0 2017

5 Count of student large screen tablets meeting specifications

8 50 2017

6 Percent of schools meeting recommended bandwidth standard

0 100 2015

7 Percent of wireless classrooms (80211n or higher)

0 100 2015

Infrastructure Needs Analysis (District Provided)

Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

8 Complete district wide rewiring to CAT6e

92214 Page 5

- currently using CA T3 creating internal 0 100 201512016

9 speed limitations Access layer Switches UPSs to ensure 201512016

network availability and success test 0 100

10 Full Network replacement Core to Access layer all sites with RouterlFirewall 0 100 2015

Enhancements

Skilled Workforce and Economic Development

Professional Development Instructional personnel and staff shall have access to opportunities and training to assist with the integration ofteclmology into classroom teaching

Professional Development should be evaluated based on the level ofcurrent teclmology integration by teachers into classrooms This will measure the impact of the professional development for digital learning into the classrooms The Teclmology Integration Matrix (TIM) can be found at httpfcitusfedulmatrixlmatrixphp Average integration should be recorded as the percent of teachers at each of the 5 categories of the TIM for the levels ofteclmology integration into the classroom curriculum

bull Entry bull Adoption bull Adaptation bull Infusion bull Transformation

Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (Required) Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 A verage Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM

2 Average Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM (Elementary Schools)

-Entry 5 0 2016 -Adoption 60 10 2016 -Adaptation 25 45 2016 -Infusion 8 30 2016 -Transformation 2 15 2017

3 A verage Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (High Schools)

4 Average Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (Combination Schools)

Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (District Provided) Target to be

92214 Page 6

Achieved (year)

5 6 7 8 9

Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here

Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning

Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively

Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses

Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ

in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time

Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to

Partially implemented

Will work to

2016

922114 Page 7

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and

implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

922114 Page 8

technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for

Target to be Achieved

(year)

10 11 12

bull Quality Efficient Services

Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments

Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window

Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (yearl

1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window

2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to

computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be

Achieved (year)

3 4 5

This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years

922114 Page 9

STEP 2 - Goal Setting

Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted

These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals

Goals Examples

EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet

expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for

industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed

bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum

bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students

Enter district goals below

bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school

bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement

bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources

bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning

bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners

STEP 3 - Strategy Setting

Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation

92214 Page 10

Examples of Strategies

EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement

Strategy Supply teachers and students with high

Measurement

bull Purchase Instructional

Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015

quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat

Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing

achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for

bull Integrate instructional

each student materials into system

Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps

supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments

bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms

bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e

bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches

bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016

Enter the district strategies below

Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains

Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field

Bandwidth amount 200Mbps

2014 and ongoing

922114 Page 11

trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I

25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools

I

I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I

certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer

Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-

boarding new grade levels in 2016

To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved

school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device

policyI

To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies

Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc

To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions

aligned to the needs of all learners

In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs

92214 Page 12

Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to

o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation

o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A

Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)

Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS

92214 Page 13

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 5: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

(year) I

1 ELA Student Achievement 83 85 2015

2 Math Student Achievement 88 88 2015

3 Science Student Achievement 79 81 2015

4 ELA Learning Gains 75 pts 78 pts 2015

5 Math Learning Gains 79 pts 80 pts 2015 ~

6 ELA Learning Gains of the Low 25 73 75 2015

7 8

Math Learning Gains of the Low 25 Overall 4-year Graduation Rate

76 NA

71 NA

2015 NA

9 Acceleration Success Rate NA NA NA 10

bull Quality Efficient Services

Technology Infrastructure Districts shall create a digital learning infrastructure with the appropriate levels of bandwidth devices hardware and software

For the infrastructure needs analysis the required data points can and should be pulled from the Technology Readiness Inventory (TRI) if the data is accurate Districts may choose to add any additional metrics that may be appropriate

Infrastructure Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 Student to Computer Device Ratio 3 1 1 1 2017 2 Count of student instructio nal desktop

computers meeting specifications 181 80 2017

3 Count of student instructional mobile computers (laptops) meeting specifications

60 300 2017

4 Count of student web-thin client computers meeting specifications

0 0 2017

5 Count of student large screen tablets meeting specifications

8 50 2017

6 Percent of schools meeting recommended bandwidth standard

0 100 2015

7 Percent of wireless classrooms (80211n or higher)

0 100 2015

Infrastructure Needs Analysis (District Provided)

Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

8 Complete district wide rewiring to CAT6e

92214 Page 5

- currently using CA T3 creating internal 0 100 201512016

9 speed limitations Access layer Switches UPSs to ensure 201512016

network availability and success test 0 100

10 Full Network replacement Core to Access layer all sites with RouterlFirewall 0 100 2015

Enhancements

Skilled Workforce and Economic Development

Professional Development Instructional personnel and staff shall have access to opportunities and training to assist with the integration ofteclmology into classroom teaching

Professional Development should be evaluated based on the level ofcurrent teclmology integration by teachers into classrooms This will measure the impact of the professional development for digital learning into the classrooms The Teclmology Integration Matrix (TIM) can be found at httpfcitusfedulmatrixlmatrixphp Average integration should be recorded as the percent of teachers at each of the 5 categories of the TIM for the levels ofteclmology integration into the classroom curriculum

bull Entry bull Adoption bull Adaptation bull Infusion bull Transformation

Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (Required) Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 A verage Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM

2 Average Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM (Elementary Schools)

-Entry 5 0 2016 -Adoption 60 10 2016 -Adaptation 25 45 2016 -Infusion 8 30 2016 -Transformation 2 15 2017

3 A verage Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (High Schools)

4 Average Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (Combination Schools)

Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (District Provided) Target to be

92214 Page 6

Achieved (year)

5 6 7 8 9

Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here

Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning

Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively

Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses

Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ

in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time

Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to

Partially implemented

Will work to

2016

922114 Page 7

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and

implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

922114 Page 8

technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for

Target to be Achieved

(year)

10 11 12

bull Quality Efficient Services

Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments

Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window

Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (yearl

1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window

2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to

computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be

Achieved (year)

3 4 5

This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years

922114 Page 9

STEP 2 - Goal Setting

Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted

These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals

Goals Examples

EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet

expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for

industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed

bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum

bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students

Enter district goals below

bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school

bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement

bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources

bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning

bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners

STEP 3 - Strategy Setting

Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation

92214 Page 10

Examples of Strategies

EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement

Strategy Supply teachers and students with high

Measurement

bull Purchase Instructional

Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015

quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat

Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing

achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for

bull Integrate instructional

each student materials into system

Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps

supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments

bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms

bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e

bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches

bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016

Enter the district strategies below

Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains

Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field

Bandwidth amount 200Mbps

2014 and ongoing

922114 Page 11

trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I

25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools

I

I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I

certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer

Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-

boarding new grade levels in 2016

To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved

school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device

policyI

To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies

Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc

To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions

aligned to the needs of all learners

In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs

92214 Page 12

Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to

o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation

o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A

Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)

Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS

92214 Page 13

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 6: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

- currently using CA T3 creating internal 0 100 201512016

9 speed limitations Access layer Switches UPSs to ensure 201512016

network availability and success test 0 100

10 Full Network replacement Core to Access layer all sites with RouterlFirewall 0 100 2015

Enhancements

Skilled Workforce and Economic Development

Professional Development Instructional personnel and staff shall have access to opportunities and training to assist with the integration ofteclmology into classroom teaching

Professional Development should be evaluated based on the level ofcurrent teclmology integration by teachers into classrooms This will measure the impact of the professional development for digital learning into the classrooms The Teclmology Integration Matrix (TIM) can be found at httpfcitusfedulmatrixlmatrixphp Average integration should be recorded as the percent of teachers at each of the 5 categories of the TIM for the levels ofteclmology integration into the classroom curriculum

bull Entry bull Adoption bull Adaptation bull Infusion bull Transformation

Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (Required) Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 A verage Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM

2 Average Teacher teclmology integration via the TIM (Elementary Schools)

-Entry 5 0 2016 -Adoption 60 10 2016 -Adaptation 25 45 2016 -Infusion 8 30 2016 -Transformation 2 15 2017

3 A verage Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (High Schools)

4 Average Teacher teclmology integration NA via the TIM (Combination Schools)

Professional Development Needs Analysis Baseline Target Date for (District Provided) Target to be

92214 Page 6

Achieved (year)

5 6 7 8 9

Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here

Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning

Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively

Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses

Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ

in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time

Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to

Partially implemented

Will work to

2016

922114 Page 7

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and

implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

922114 Page 8

technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for

Target to be Achieved

(year)

10 11 12

bull Quality Efficient Services

Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments

Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window

Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (yearl

1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window

2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to

computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be

Achieved (year)

3 4 5

This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years

922114 Page 9

STEP 2 - Goal Setting

Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted

These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals

Goals Examples

EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet

expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for

industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed

bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum

bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students

Enter district goals below

bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school

bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement

bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources

bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning

bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners

STEP 3 - Strategy Setting

Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation

92214 Page 10

Examples of Strategies

EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement

Strategy Supply teachers and students with high

Measurement

bull Purchase Instructional

Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015

quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat

Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing

achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for

bull Integrate instructional

each student materials into system

Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps

supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments

bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms

bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e

bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches

bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016

Enter the district strategies below

Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains

Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field

Bandwidth amount 200Mbps

2014 and ongoing

922114 Page 11

trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I

25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools

I

I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I

certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer

Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-

boarding new grade levels in 2016

To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved

school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device

policyI

To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies

Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc

To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions

aligned to the needs of all learners

In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs

92214 Page 12

Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to

o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation

o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A

Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)

Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS

92214 Page 13

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 7: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

Achieved (year)

5 6 7 8 9

Other Technology Professional Development Needs identified by your school describe here

Establish and maintain Professional Learning Communities (PLC) and Networks (PLN) including integrated technology systems to support management operations teaching and learning

Provide training and support that focuses on both existing and emerging technology tools so they are utilized to their fullest capacity with the intent to advance instruction uniquely and innovatively

Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access Digital Tools Districts shall continue to implement and support a digital tools system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

A key component to digital tools is the implementation and integration of a digital tool system that assists district instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance Districts may also add metrics for the measurement of CAPE digital tools For the required metrics of the digital tool system need analysis please use the following responses

Baseline Response Target Response Fully implemented Will continue to support and employ

in classrooms Partially implemented Will work to implement and employ Partially implemented Maintain system No system in place Will work to implement and employ No system in place No plans to address at this time

Digital Tools Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (year)

1 I Implementation status a system that enables teachers and administrators to

Partially implemented

Will work to

2016

922114 Page 7

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and

implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

922114 Page 8

technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for

Target to be Achieved

(year)

10 11 12

bull Quality Efficient Services

Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments

Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window

Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (yearl

1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window

2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to

computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be

Achieved (year)

3 4 5

This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years

922114 Page 9

STEP 2 - Goal Setting

Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted

These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals

Goals Examples

EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet

expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for

industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed

bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum

bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students

Enter district goals below

bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school

bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement

bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources

bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning

bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners

STEP 3 - Strategy Setting

Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation

92214 Page 10

Examples of Strategies

EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement

Strategy Supply teachers and students with high

Measurement

bull Purchase Instructional

Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015

quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat

Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing

achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for

bull Integrate instructional

each student materials into system

Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps

supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments

bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms

bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e

bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches

bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016

Enter the district strategies below

Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains

Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field

Bandwidth amount 200Mbps

2014 and ongoing

922114 Page 11

trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I

25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools

I

I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I

certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer

Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-

boarding new grade levels in 2016

To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved

school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device

policyI

To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies

Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc

To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions

aligned to the needs of all learners

In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs

92214 Page 12

Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to

o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation

o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A

Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)

Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS

92214 Page 13

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 8: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

access information about benchmarks and uses it to create aligned curriculum guides Implementation status of a system that Partially provides teachers and administrators the implemented ability to create instructional materials andor resources and lesson plans Implementation status of a system that Partially supports the assessment lifecycle from item Implemented creation to assessment authoring and administration and scoring Implementation status of a system that Partially includes district staff information Implemented combined with the ability to create and manage professional development offerings and plans Implementation status of a system that Partially includes comprehensive student Implemented information that is used to inform instructional decisions in the classroom for analysis and for communicating to students and parents about classroom activities and progress Implementation status of a system that Partially leverages the availability of data about Implemented students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to provide new ways of viewing and analyzing data Implementation status of a system that Partially houses documents videos and information Implemented for teachers students parents district administrators and technical support to access when they have questions about how to use or support the system Implementation status of a system that Partially includes or seamlessly shares information Implemented about students district staff benchmarks courses assessments and instructional resources to enable teachers students parents and district administrators to use data to inform instruction and operational practices Implementation status of a system that Partially provides secure role-based access to its Implemented features and data for teachers students parents district administrators and

implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

Will work 2016 to implement and employ

922114 Page 8

technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for

Target to be Achieved

(year)

10 11 12

bull Quality Efficient Services

Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments

Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window

Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (yearl

1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window

2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to

computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be

Achieved (year)

3 4 5

This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years

922114 Page 9

STEP 2 - Goal Setting

Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted

These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals

Goals Examples

EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet

expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for

industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed

bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum

bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students

Enter district goals below

bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school

bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement

bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources

bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning

bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners

STEP 3 - Strategy Setting

Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation

92214 Page 10

Examples of Strategies

EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement

Strategy Supply teachers and students with high

Measurement

bull Purchase Instructional

Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015

quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat

Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing

achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for

bull Integrate instructional

each student materials into system

Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps

supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments

bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms

bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e

bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches

bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016

Enter the district strategies below

Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains

Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field

Bandwidth amount 200Mbps

2014 and ongoing

922114 Page 11

trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I

25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools

I

I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I

certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer

Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-

boarding new grade levels in 2016

To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved

school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device

policyI

To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies

Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc

To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions

aligned to the needs of all learners

In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs

92214 Page 12

Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to

o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation

o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A

Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)

Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS

92214 Page 13

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 9: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

technical support Digital Tools Needs Analysis (District Provided) Baseline Target Date for

Target to be Achieved

(year)

10 11 12

bull Quality Efficient Services

Online Assessment Readiness Districts shall work to reduce the amount time used for the administration of computer-based assessments

Online assessment (or computer-based testing) will be measured by the computer-based testing certification tool and the number of devices available and used for each assessment window

Online Assessments Needs Analysis (Required) Baseline Target Date for Target to be

Achieved (yearl

1 Computer-Based Assessment Certification 60 25 2015 Tool completion rate for schools In the of testing of testing district (Spring 2014) window window

2 Computersdevices required for 31 1 1 2017 assessments (based on schedule ratio of ratio of constraints) students to students to

computers computers Online Assessments Needs Analysis (District Baseline Target Date for Provided) Target to be

Achieved (year)

3 4 5

This outcome was achieved utilizing a model leasing additional classroom space which is no longer available in present or future years

922114 Page 9

STEP 2 - Goal Setting

Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted

These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals

Goals Examples

EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet

expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for

industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed

bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum

bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students

Enter district goals below

bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school

bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement

bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources

bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning

bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners

STEP 3 - Strategy Setting

Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation

92214 Page 10

Examples of Strategies

EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement

Strategy Supply teachers and students with high

Measurement

bull Purchase Instructional

Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015

quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat

Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing

achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for

bull Integrate instructional

each student materials into system

Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps

supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments

bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms

bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e

bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches

bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016

Enter the district strategies below

Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains

Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field

Bandwidth amount 200Mbps

2014 and ongoing

922114 Page 11

trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I

25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools

I

I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I

certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer

Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-

boarding new grade levels in 2016

To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved

school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device

policyI

To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies

Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc

To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions

aligned to the needs of all learners

In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs

92214 Page 12

Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to

o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation

o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A

Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)

Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS

92214 Page 13

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 10: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

STEP 2 - Goal Setting

Provide goals established by the district that support the districts mission and vision These goals may be the same as goals or guiding principles the district has already established or adopted

These should be long-term that focus on the needs of the district identified in step one The goals should be focused on improving education for all students including those with disabilities These goals may be already established goals ofthe district and strategies in step 3 will be identified for how digital learning can help achieve these goals

Goals Examples

EXAMPLES bull Highest Student Achievement All schools will meet federal AMO benchmarks and meet

expected growth on state assessments bull Seamless Articulation and Maximum Access All students will have opportunities for

industry certifications and are prepared to enter postsecondary with the skills necessary to succeed

bull Skilled Workforce and Economic Development All teachers will have opportunities for professional development to develop skills for implementing digital learning into the curriculum

bull Quality Efficient Services All school sites will be safe and effective environments to support developing students

Enter district goals below

bull To increase the accessibility of educational resources both inside and outside the school

bull To increase the device-per-student count by acquiring additional PCs laptops and tablets in order to maximize student achievement

bull To ensure all classrooms have adequate and equitable technology resources

bull To provide differentiated support to all teachers in the implementation of digital learning

bull To provide supplemental technology resources to meet the needs ofTier 3 learners

STEP 3 - Strategy Setting

Districts will outline high-level digital learning and technology strategies that will help achieve the goals of the district Each strategy will outline the districts theory-of-action for how the goals in Step 2 will be addressed Each strategy should have a measurement and timeline estimation

92214 Page 10

Examples of Strategies

EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement

Strategy Supply teachers and students with high

Measurement

bull Purchase Instructional

Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015

quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat

Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing

achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for

bull Integrate instructional

each student materials into system

Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps

supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments

bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms

bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e

bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches

bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016

Enter the district strategies below

Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains

Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field

Bandwidth amount 200Mbps

2014 and ongoing

922114 Page 11

trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I

25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools

I

I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I

certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer

Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-

boarding new grade levels in 2016

To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved

school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device

policyI

To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies

Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc

To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions

aligned to the needs of all learners

In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs

92214 Page 12

Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to

o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation

o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A

Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)

Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS

92214 Page 13

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 11: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

Examples of Strategies

EXAMPLES Goal Addressed Highest student achievement

Strategy Supply teachers and students with high

Measurement

bull Purchase Instructional

Timeline 50 of purchases in 2014-2015

quality digital content Materials in digital aligned to the Florida fonnat

Highest student Standards Continue support of bull Fully implement 2014 and ongoing

achievement an integrated digital system across nine tool system to aid components teachers in providing the best education for

bull Integrate instructional

each student materials into system

Highest student Create an bull Bandwidth amount 2014-2019 achievement infrastructure that 200Mbps

supports the needs of digital learning and online assessments

bull Expanded Wireless access for all classrooms

bull Rewire of Schools Sites from CAT3 to CAT6e

bull Replace Core and Access Layer Switches

bull Deploy additional testing seats via additional computing workstations for on-boarding new grade levels in 2016

Enter the district strategies below

Goal Addressed Strategy Measurement Timeline Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains

Bandwidth enhancements to all for virtual learning opportunities (Streaming video and Teleconference field

Bandwidth amount 200Mbps

2014 and ongoing

922114 Page 11

trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I

25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools

I

I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I

certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer

Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-

boarding new grade levels in 2016

To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved

school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device

policyI

To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies

Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc

To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions

aligned to the needs of all learners

In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs

92214 Page 12

Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to

o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation

o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A

Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)

Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS

92214 Page 13

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 12: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

trips) Students scoring in Network bull Expanded Wireless 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing enhancements to access for all I

25 will make accommodate classrooms learning gains expanded testing bull Rewire of Schools

I

I requirements for End Sites from CAT3 to of Course testing and CAT6e I

certification bull Replace Core and processes Access Layer

Students scoring in Provide additional bull Deploy additional 2014 and ongoing the lowest-performing testing seats for testing seats via 25 will make schools district additional computing learning gains workstations for on-

boarding new grade levels in 2016

To increase the Implement I Monitor student usage 2014-2015 accessibility of supplemental of programs and look educational resources technology programs for trends that support both inside and outside that can be accessed time-on-task to the school from home as well as improved

school achievement To increase the device- Utilize state allocated Increase the ratio of 2014-2017 per-student count by funds Apply for devices to students acquiring additional technology grants from 31 to 11 PCs laptops and fundraise and tablets in order to implement a Bring maximize student achievement I Your Own Device

policyI

To ensure all I Work with the system Inventory list 2014-2017 classrooms have IT department to adequate and develop an allocation equitable technology plan for new and resources existing technologies

Provide additional mobile labs tablets etc

To provide Implement Formative 2014-2015 supplemental supp lementa I Assessments and technology resources to technology programs Progress Monitoring meet the needs of all that provide intensive Tools learners strategic interventions

aligned to the needs of all learners

In addition if the district participates in federal technology initiatives and grant programs please describe below a plan for meeting requirements of such initiatives and grant programs

92214 Page 12

Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to

o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation

o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A

Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)

Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS

92214 Page 13

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 13: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

Part III DIGITAL CLASSROOMS PLAN - ALLOCATION PROPOSAL

The DCP and the DCP Allocation must include five key components as required by sl OI162(12)(b) FS In this section ofthe DCP districts will outline specific deliverables that will be implemented in the current year that are funded from the DCP Allocation The five components that are included are

A) Student Performance Outcomes B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure C) Professional Development D) Digital Tools E) Online Assessments

This section of the DCP will document the activities and deliverables under each component The section for each component include but are not limited to

o Implementation Plan - Provide details on the planned deliverables andor milestones for the implementation ofeach activity for the component area This should be specific to the deliverables that will be funded from the DCP Allocation

o Evaluation and Success Criteria - For each step of the implementation plan describe process for evaluating the status of the implementation and once complete how successful implementation will be determined This should include how the deliverable will tie to the measurement of the student performance outcome goals established in component A

Districts are not required to include in the DCP the portion of charter school allocation or charter school plan deliverables In s lOl162(l2)(c) FS charter schools are eligible for a proportionate share of the DCP Allocation as required for categorical programs in s 1 00233( 17)(b)

Districts may also choose to provide funds to schools within the school district through a competitive process as outlined in s lOl162(12)(c) FS

92214 Page 13

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 14: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

Districts will determine specific student performance outcomes based on district needs and goals that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation These outcomes can be specific to an individual school site grade levelband subject or content area or district wide These outcomes are the specific goals that the district plans to improve through the implementation of the deliverables funded by the DCP Allocation for the 2014-15 school year

EXAMPLES Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target

1 Increase percent of fourth grade mathematics students performing at Sunshine Elementary school

45 48

2 Improve graduation rates at Sandy Shores High schoo 1

78 80

Enter the district student performance outcomes for 2014-15 that will be directly impacted by the DCP Allocation below

Student Performance Outcomes Baseline Target 1 Students scoring in the lowest-performing

25 will make learning gains in reading 75 78

2 Students scoring in the lowest-performing 25 will make learning gains in mathematics

79 80

3 4 5

92214 Page 14

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 15: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

State recommendations for technology infrastructure can be found at httpwwwfldoeorgiB Illlnstruct_ T echpdfiDevice-BandwidthTechSpecspd f These specifications are recommendations that will accommodate the requirements of state supported applications and assessments

Implementation Plan for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

EXAMPLES Infrastructure Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

BX

Purchase and implement wireless access points

May 2015 $4000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

BX I

Purchase and implement 100 new student laptop devices

February 2015

$6000 All fourth grade classes at Sunshine Elementary school

Outcome Example 1

Infrastructure Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

B1 Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router

082015 $35000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward B2 Purchase and implement

new student laptop devices 75 082016 $45000 PPCESshy

FSUFSUS Outcome and 2

1

Broward B3 Upgrade to CAT6e (Cabling) 082015 $36000 Ii PPCES- Outcome 1

I FSUFSUS Broward

and 2

BA Network Access

Refresh Core and 092015 $68000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome and 2

1

Broward

92214 Page 15

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 16: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

Evaluation and Success Criteria for B) Digital Learning and Technology Infrastructure

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Infrastructure Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable (from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process(es)

Success Criteria

Bl Additional Bandwidth 200 Mbps and Supporting Router will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B2 Laptop devices will be purchased by August 2015 (Finance Office) Laptop devices will be delivered by September 2015 (IT Office) Laptop devices are imaged and prepared for delivery (IT Office)

After successful distribution of devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B3 Upgrade to CA T6e (Cabling) will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

B4 Network Refresh Core and Access will be completed by August 2015 (IT Office)

After successful installation of devices students scoring in the lowest 25 th percentile will have uninterrupted access to Internet and will be able have seamless technology integration This will be measured by the

92214 Page 16

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 17: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

Technology Integration Matrix and academic erformance data

Additionally if the district intends to use any portion of the DCP allocation for the technology and infrastructure needs area B s101162(12)(b) FS requires districts to submit a third-party evaluation of the results of the districts technology inventory and infrastructure needs Please describe the process used for the evaluation and submit the evaluation results with the DCP

State recommendations for digital learning professional development include at a minimum shyHigh Quality Master In-service Plan (MIP) Components that address

bull School leadership look-fors on quality digital learning processes in the classroom bull Educator capacity to use available technology bull Instructional lesson planning using digital resources bull Student digital learning practices

These MIP components should include participant implementation agreements that address issues arising in needs analyses and be supported by school level monitoring and feedback processes supporting educator growth related to digital learning

Please insert links to the district MIP to support this area attach a draft as an appendix to the district DCP or provide deliverables on how this will be addressed

Implementation Plan for C) Professional Development

The plan should include process for scheduling delivery of the districts MIP components on digital learning and identify other school based processes that will provide on-going support for professional development on digital learning

EXAMPLES Professional Development Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

CX X high school teachers participate in professional development aligned with MIP

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

CX X teachers participate in book study and lesson studies on digital learning

May 2015 $X Sandy Shores High School

Outcome Example 2

I Professional Development Implementation

92214 Page 17

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 18: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

c1

Deliverable

45 elementary school teachers and support staff

Estimated Completion Date

May 2015

Estimated Cost

$10000

School District

PPCESshyFSUFSUS

Outcome from Section A)

Outcome 1 I and 2

participate In professional Broward development aligned with

C2 MIP 45 elementary school teachers and support staff participate In Professional

May 2015 and ongoing

$7500 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome and 2

1

Learning Communities digital learning

on

I

1 I

C3 C4

If no district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities I Other funding source

I I

Evaluation and Success Criteria for C) Professional Development

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

Professional Develo~ment Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable [from above)

Monitoring and Evaluation and Process( es)

Success Criteria

C l Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in professio nal development aligned with MIP will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C2 Elementary school teachers and support staff will participate in Professional Learning Communities on digital learning will begin by August 2015

After completion of training staff members will use quality digital learning process with students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile This will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

C3 C4

92214 Page 18

I

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 19: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

Digital Tools should include a comprehensive digital tool system for the improvement ofdigital learning Districts will be required to maintain a digital tools system that is intended to support and assist district and school instructional personnel and staff in the management assessment and monitoring of student learning and perfonnance

Digital tools may also include purchases and activities to support CAPE digital tools opportunities and courses A list of currently recommended certificates and credentials can be found at httpwwwfldoeorglworkforcefcpeadefaultasp Devices that meet or exceed minimum requirements and protocols established by the department may also be included here

Implementation Plan for D) Digital Tools

EXAMPLES Digital Tools Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

DX Integrate X sets of instructional materials into the digital tools system

September 2014

$X Sunshine Elementary school

Example Outcome 1

DX Offer X additional CAPE digital tool certifications from approved list

2014-15 $X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Digital Tools Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

Dl Multifunction Printers Scanners Fax Machines

2015-16 $14400 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D2 Digital Response Center Smartboards Document Cameras

2015-16 $66000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D3 Large Screen Mobile Computing Devices (Tablets)

2015-16 $25000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

D4 Laptops for teachers 2015-16 $27000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

92214 Page 19

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 20: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

I

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Other fundilg source Brief description of other activities

Evaluation and Success Criteria for D) Digital Tools

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Di~ital Tools Evaluation and Success Criteria Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and Success Criteria

(from above) Process( es) D l Multifunction Printers After successful distribution of devices

Scanners Fax Machines will be student use of the technology for students purchased by August 2016 scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be

measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

D2 Digital Response Center After successful distribution of devices Smartboards Document student use of the technology for students Cameras will be purchased by scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be August by 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data D3 Large Screen Mobile After successful distribution of devices

Computing Devices (Tablets) student use of the technology for students win be purchased by August scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be 2016 measured by the Technology Integration

Matrix and academic performance data DA 45 Teacher laptops - will be After successful distribution of devices

purchased by August 2016 teachers will use technology to plan for and increase all students learning which will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

92214 Page 20

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 21: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

- 0-- _01 ~ -- - ~~~

- - -- --- -

Technology infrastructure and devices required for successful implementation of local and statewide assessments should be considered in this section In your analysis of readiness for computer-based testing also examine network bandwidth and wireless needs that coincide with an increased number ofworkstations and devices Districts should review current technology specifications for statewide assessments (available at wwwFLAssessmentscomlTestNav8 and wwwFSAssessmentscoml) and schedule information distributed from the K-12 Student Assessment bureau when determining potential deliverables

Implementation Plan for E) Online Assessments

EXAMPLES Online Assessment Implementation

Deliverable Estimated Completion Date

Estimated Cost School Di strict

Outcome from Section A)

Ex Implement process tor restnctmg other bandwidth andor burst bandwidth speeds during testing windows

September 2014

I

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

EX Purchase 100 additional student devices for assessments

February 2015

$X Sandy Shores High School

Example Outcome 2

Online Assessment Implementation Deliverable Estimated

Completion Date

Estimated Cost School District

Outcome from Section A)

E Purchase 305 additional student devices for assessments

August 2017

$280000 PPCESshyFSUFSUS Broward

Outcome 1 and 2

E2 E3 E4

Ifno district DCP Allocation funding will be spent in this category please briefly describe below how this category will be addressed by other fund sources

Brief description of other activities Other funding source

92214 Page 21

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22

Page 22: 1 ---IIIIIIiIIII.----- 0 U A · 1_---IIIIIIiIIII.-----FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF. 0 U A _____ f1 doe.org • DISTRICT DIGITAL CLASSROOM PLAN . The intent of the District Digital Classroom

~----------------------------- -- ---- shy

Evaluation and Success Criteria for E) Online Assessments

Describe the process that will be used for evaluation of the implementation plan and the success criteria for each deliverable This evaluation process should enable the district to monitor progress toward the specific goals and targets of each deliverable and make mid-course (ie midshyyear) corrections in response to new developments and opportunities as they arise

I Online Assessment Evaluation and Success Criteria II Deliverable Monitoring and Evaluation and

(from above) I Process(es) E l Purchase 305 additional student

devices for assessments will be purchased by August 2015

E2

Success Criteria

After successful distribution of student devices student use of the technology for students scoring in the lowest 25th percentile will be measured by the Technology Integration Matrix and academic performance data

E3 I E4 I

922114 Page 22