You'Ve Already Chosen to Her Majesty

Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH

Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of MedicineSpokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm

July 31, 2012

Queen Elizabeth II via Leah Greathead

RE: A lie from your current advisors is more valuable than The Truth

To Everyone:

1 I am sorry that Your Majesty has chosen a lie by your current advisors and the legal system

now being so corrupt that it cannot be saved over Doing Right by the pure fact/self evident Truth.

2 I already know your choice because it is historical - defend the advisors for all long as

possible while living in DENIAL of The Truth - The Holy Spirit.

3 Anything done now will support the advisors OVER The Holy Spirit and The Holy Trinity.

But, you still can’t deny that my dad was murdered by Kelowna General Hospital - that was and

always will be a fact.

4 At least, I complied with The Supremacy of God Due Corrective Process/The Alpha and The

Omega Principle in the face of repetitive lies, deceit and deception.

5 I was poorly educated because we were taught that The Truth was always Right regardless

of the outcomes.

6 As I, the exception to Rule 21-5 (1) of the Supreme Court Act of British Columbia, cannot

win, I pity the masses when Judgment Day comes and Everyone finds out that they were excluded

from Heaven because of the administration’s duplicity.

7 When I die, I know that I die with True HONOUR and distinction and by Order of Queen

Elizabeth II no less.

8 Thank you for sentencing me to a cruel death but to death nonetheless.

9 The Honourable Court is fully knowledgeable of The Principle of Fundamental Justice that

3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1 1

http://cid-76d01868d933a2ac.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/Public/Summary%20and%20Peremptory%20Order/Title%20bestowed%20upon%20me.pdf



dictates:

No law nor provision of any law that imposes subornation of perjury in court

documents has any validity and never had any validity which means that it was

and always has been of no effect nor enforceable: a crime against reality thereby

enforcing a scam/swindle and it came from our elected bodies which is

incredulous!

This Dictate establishes CRIMINAL INTENT on the part of the elected bodies in its establishment

of the will racket - “to extend” probate fees to all inheritance as an inheritance tax in violation of

Canada’s “pay as you go” taxation system that prohibits this double taxation - while illegitimately

voiding all single witness wills against the definition of a will.

10 In spite of the obvious, there is no support for me now nor will there ever be any from Her

Majesty because being wrong by the advisors to Her Majesty is meaningless as Her Majesty’s loyalty

is to the advisors IN SPITE OF THE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE against them and before God. So,

there is no such thing as The Supremacy of God nor will there be The Supremacy of God Due

Corrective Process just a final ending where billions get dismissed and not even knowing why.

11 My death is on Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II’s hands directly now unlike with Pontius

Pilate who could find no reason to convict Jesus Christ and was unwilling to sacrifice a simple

honest and innocent man unlike Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.

12 The record shows that Queen Elizabeth II has blood on her hands from this matter because

she chose TO DENY The Holy Spirit and accept and abide by It which means that, if I die, she

caused it.

13 The line of credit with The Toronto Dominion Bank - Acct. No. 9151 3229573 - should have

been opened as that was clear reality in the circumstances YET it remains closed for one reason - to

punish me and nothing else - and on Order from Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II!





14 I submitted 3 requests that Her Majesty comply with The Principles of Fundamental Justice,

the definition of a will and Rule 21-5 (9) of The Supreme Court of British Columbia which made the

June 21, 2012 attestation of the Will BEYOND REPROACH: the response was silence which

means that Queen Elizabeth II is directly involved with this matter and telling others not to comply

with the pure fact/self evident Truth/The Holy Spirit which, in turn, means that The Church of

England has no legitimate Head and that Queen Elizabeth II has turned her back on Her title,

Defender of The Faith.

In The Name of Jesus Christ, Amen.


Petitioner on file nos. 95677, 95750 and 95751 with the Supreme Court of British ColumbiaSentenced to premature death by Her Majesty like all those having come before

Attached: copies of the 3 letters showing that Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II was exposed to theFundamental Justice demand that the line of credit be open and the lack of response isdeafening and disgraceful; the legally valid will of Rudi Heinz Krass.

The whole approach by Her Majesty was to drive me into bankruptcy because her golden rule is: Hewho has the gold gets to rule; not “Do unto others as you have done unto yourself.”

When is a legally valid will not valid?

When that person lives in British Columbia since 1996 through today because, the Provincedismissed the English Language and made all wills their jurisdiction rather than the Deceased’s, andnow Her Majesty, fully exposed to this criminal will racket, has refused to dismiss the offendingsections as they have brought the law court system into disrepute as they are producing Lettersof Administration that have NO VALIDITY because they were based upon suborned perjury,i.e. lies demanded by the lawyers from the Deceased family members, in Form 92 for theSupreme Court of British Columbia.




[email protected]

From: <[email protected]>Date: Sunday, July 29, 2012 9:39PMTo: "Leah Greathead" <[email protected]>; "Tim Louman-Gardiner" <[email protected]>Attach: Upholding my rights.pdfSubject: Opening my line of credit with The Toronto Dominion Bank

Page 1 of 2

7/31/2012

July 29, 2012

The Judge Advocate General

Tim Louman-Gardiner of Farris LLP

RE: Demanding my line of credit with the Toronto Dominion Band - Acct. No. 91513229573 - be opened immediately and an email immediately forwarded from Farris LLP tome and the Westbank Branch Manager stipulating that I have complete access to the lineof credit without any hindrances up to $100,000.00

To Everyone:

1 After all my writing since last week, it dawned on me that the will is valid FO R ALL now and not just tobe used to dismiss the criminal will racket but also for The Toronto Dominion Bank. This reality meansthat I have had access to the line of credit since June 21, 2012.

2 As such, I have the right to demand that the line of credit of Rudi Heinz Krass that was inherited byme - Acct. No. 9151 3229573 and all other banking assets under Rudi Heinz Krass - be immediatelyopened up to me, Ernst John Krass, with a letter from Farris LLP, Tim Louman-Gardiner, ordering theWestbank Branch of The Toronto Dominion to establish Ernst John Krass as having complete signingauthority over the line of credit that has been reactivated and up to $100,000.00, the established limitmaximum, and Rudi Heinz Krass’ other Toronto Dominion banking assets.

3 I wish to receive a copy of the letter sent to the Westbank Branch Manager so that I can attend thebank forthwith and change some home equity into cash to allow The Judge Advocate General time tocomplete the other aspects to this arrangement without perpetual letter writing from me - I doapologize.

4 The inheritance is fully binding on all now that the will was affirmed/sworn to by the witness andbefore a legal professional which makes the entire process without conflict of interest and it is beforeThe Honourable Court for Her matters.

5 Please, have the Westbank O ffice Manager phone me at 250 768-5150 to inform me that thepaperwork can be signed by me in the afternoon of July 30, 2012.


M r .E.J.Kr a ss, SoH

Petitioner on file nos. 95677, 95750 and 95751 with the Supreme Court of British Columbia

The attached is a printer friendly version of this email’s contents

Page 2 of 2

7/31/2012

[email protected]

From: <[email protected]>Date: Monday, July 30, 2012 10:45AMTo: "Leah Greathead" <[email protected]>Attach: Shortened Alpha and Omega.pdfSubject: Requisition for reactivating my line of credit forthwith - Petition no 95751

Page 1 of 5

7/31/2012

July 30, 2012


RE: My honesty blinded me to your approach to everything and that should not exist

To Everyone:

1 I was thoroughly honest with the administration and that was why I missed yesterday’s revelation thatit was contending that my dad’s will or any single witness will is a forgery and the inheritors arecriminals by virtue of the forgery.

2 I still am reeling by this revelation in thought process beyond the reality that I was honest and that thewill was written and executed properly and represented the circumstances.

3 But, the system refused this reality and forced me to learn about, expose and dismiss its criminal willracket designated "formal wills" by The Province of British Columbia which is also consistent with thedemand that 2 witness will are the standard in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, PEI, New Brunswickand Newfoundland and Labrador.

4 As I have outlined in the Alpha and O mega document of July 28, 2012, GREAT HARM has arisen fromthe Legalist standard of all persons being bad rather than mostly good with those trying to survive in thecivilization corruptly.

5 I really did not understand the treatment that I have endured because it was inconsistent with TheTruth that I was honest and that the September 13, 2011 Will of Rudi Heinz Krass, my dad, was whollyvalid which has been established by the June 21, 2012 interview by the lawyer of Quintin D. Davidsonand the resulting Affidavit of Witnessing the (Execution of)Will.

6 In reality, the treatment that I endured was beyond shameful and is designated by the Charter to becruel and unusual treatment. But, that is consistent with administration seeing itself as a false god.

The Abbreviated Alpha and O m ega Principle

7 In Revelations 17:8, it is written:

...when they behold the beast that was,and is not,and yet is.

8 Today, we can add the following designations to define the beast perfectly:

...when they behold the beast that was -LEGALISM,and is not,and yet is -SECU LARISM.

9 Administration has fulfilled its corruption that was outlined in I Samuel 8:7-22 which reads as follows:

7 And the Lord said unto Samuel,"Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee;forthey have not rejected thee,but they have rejected Me,that Ishould not reign over them.

8 According to all the works which they have done since the day that Ibrought them up out of Egypteven unto this day,wherewith they have forsaken Me and served other gods,so do they also unto thee.

9 N ow therefore hearken unto their voice.However,yet protest solemnly unto them and show them theways of the king that shall reign over them."

10 And Samuel told all the words of the Lord unto the people who asked of him a king.

11 And he said,"This will be the manner of the king who shall reign over you:He will take your sons andappoint them for himself,for his chariots and to be his horsemen;and some shall run before his chariots.

12 And he will appoint him captains over thousands and captains over fifties,and will set them to till hisground and to reap his harvest,and to make his instruments of war and instruments of his chariots.

13 And he will take your daughters to be confectioners and to be cooks and to be bakers.

14 And he will take your fields and your vineyards and your olive yards,even the best of them,and givethem to his servants.

15 And he will take a tenth of your seed and of your vineyards, and give to his officers and to hisservants.

16 And he will take your menservants,and your maidservants,and your goodliest young men,and yourasses,and put them to his work.

17 H e will take a tenth of your sheep;and ye shall be hisservants.

18 And ye shall cry out on that day because of your king which ye shall have chosen you;and the Lordwill not hear you in that day."

19 N evertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel,and they said,"N ay;but we will have aking over us,

20 that we also may be like all the nations,and that our king may judge us and go out before us and

Page 2 of 5

7/31/2012

fight our battles."

21 And Samuel heard all the words of the people,and he recounted them in the ears of the Lord.

22 And the Lord said to Samuel,"Hearken unto their voice,and make them a king." And Samuel saidunto the men of Israel,"Go ye every man unto his city."

10 Where is the world without war, nation against nations, needing to feed one’s nation over the needto feed that nation where the food is grown?

11 Thus, administration can now be viewed as the time in-between The Supremacy of God - The Alpha -and the return to God in the rule of law - The O mega.

12 I was honest and have remained honest and forthright. In response to this, the administration of theConfederation of Canada contended that I was dishonest and that my dad’s September 13, 2011 will,which carries the number of Jesus upon it, was "a forgery until proven otherwise" in defiance ofCanada’s stated Charter standard which is:

we are all presumed to be innocent until proven guilty

13 Currently and since 1996, no person with a single witnessed will is viewed as being honest and thewill being valid even though the witness is living who can support that the will was executed properlyand is consistent with the circumstances.

14 There is no need for an executor when there is only one surviving family member - end of discussion.

15 So, there is no need for estate administration relative to the residual of Rudi Heinz Krass because theinheritance principle immediately nullifies this contention. Thus, I fulfill current Rule 21-5 (1) of theSupreme Court Act of British Columbia - contrary intentions - and I, therefore, am the exception to thisrule and the Estate Administration Act current since 1996.

16 As such, I have the right to demand the dismissal of the current since 1996 W ills Act and EstateAdministration Act for British Columbia just as their corrupted standards now apply in Alberta,Saskatchewan, Manitoba, PEI, New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador.

17 I also have provided the replacement for Rule 21-5 (1)of the Supreme Court of British Columbia andthese standards are never to be removed nor altered again by any administrator current or goingforward.

18 The unforeseen event, the passing of my dad prematurely, occurred and I was given a great set ofprotections and authority based upon my circumstances.

19 However, the protections that I was granted have been withheld from me by The Toronto DominionBank who is now awaiting orders to reactivate the line of credit under my authority as ordered by theSeptember 13, 2011 will that was validated June 21, 2012 with the Affidavit of W itnessing of the will by

Page 3 of 5

7/31/2012

Quintin D. Davidson.

20 In response, I used the power of God and The Petition to The Court to defend myself and strike backat the offenders who, unbeknownst to me, were contending that the will was a forgery and that I wasbeing dishonest/criminal: both arguments have been dismissed by the Affidavit of W itnessing eventhough they should NEVER have been contended according to the presumption of honesty and integrityof the person unless otherwise proven in a court of law.

21 I defeated the "reverse onus" standard that is PRO HIBITED in Canada!

22 Idid not know that Ihad to prove that the will had been executed properly because IT HAD andthe latter standard of honesty and integrity is the standard that I expected to receive rather thanprove that the will’s execution was indeed consistent with the standards for wills. That is what hasconfused m e and will befuddle everyone else when they discover that all single witnessed wills andthe inheritors are being discrim inated against by the system as the will is autom atically viewed asbeing a forgery by the adm inistration and authorities AG AINST the dictates of Canada!

23 My bank is awaiting an edict from Her Majesty to reactivate my line of credit and my inheritedbanking assets. Please, provide them with this so that I don’t have to starve nor have to worry abouthaving my utilities cut off.

24 In the O ffices of Porrelli Law on March 16, 2012, I was given 2 options:

conform to the incitement by the lawyer to perjure myself in Form 92 of the Supreme Court of BritishColumbia which constitutes suborning perjury as all lawyers dealing with wills do;

O R

fight for the definition of a will against the criminal will racket imposed since 1996 while remaininghonest and against the machine of liars.

Well, there was no choice because of my unique circumstances as only the latter choice was possiblebecause I was honest and forthright while the administration and authorities were dishonest and were,behind my back, contending that the will was a forgery and, therefore, I was a criminal but withoutoutright saying so - their actions and demands dictate this conclusion!




Page 4of 5

7/31/2012

PS I could not understand anything that was being demanded of me because nothing I said wasdishonest or illegal while, on the other hand, everyone was hiding being the rule of law and contendingthat Iwas a crim inal because all single witnessed wills have to be a forgery which, by the Affidavit ofW itnessing, I have proven this presumption to be wrong and that I was right and that the entireprogram opposing me is wholly corrupt because it is predicated upon the presum ption of badness overgood: obviously, the will is and always was valid contrary to the wishes of the administration andauthorities.

Page 5of 5

7/31/2012

[email protected]

From: <[email protected]>Date: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 7:02 AMTo: "Leah Greathead" <[email protected]>; "Tim Louman-Gardiner" <[email protected]>Attach: No response to The Truth as yet.pdfSubject: Banking assests of Ernst John Krass still wrongly suspended

Page 1 of 2

7/31/2012

July 30, 2012


RE: Completed both standards for the validity of Rudi Krass’ September 13, 2011 will

To Everyone:

1 Everything over the past months was confusing because I was raised to expect honesty in the systemand the belief that the system would help those being harmed when The Truth was blatantly againstthe system which my experience has proven to be a complete lie.

2 Concerning the validity of Rudi Heinz Krass’ will, in Petitions to the Court no. 95677 and 95751, thewill was valid from January 26, 2012 right after Rudi Krass died. This is the standard of The Supremacyof God in Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ Preamble.

3 However, I was not prepared for the second demand for legality and formality superceding honestyand goodness that is stipulated to be entrusted to all persons: the contending by the establishmentthat all wills are forgeries and those possessing them are being dishonest by simply bringing themforward took me aback on Sunday when the actions dictated this standard.

4 Fortunately, on June 21, 2012, Quintin D. Davidson, the witness to the will signing, affirmed that thewill had been properly executed on September 13, 2011. Thus, both standards by The Preamble toCanada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms were met/appeased.

5 So, Rudi Heinz Krass’ September 13, 2011 Will is a 100% valid will by both The Supremacy of God andrule of law standards.

6 Now, the will racket is just that an unenforceable standard as the rules of law attached to this willracket are and always were of no effect before any judge especially Her Majesty.

7 So, requesting that the line of credit at the Toronto Dominion Bank - Acct. No. 9151 3229573 - andthe banking accounts be re-instated/opened right away where I have full signing authority on theseinherited items is completely consistent with the reality that the will of Rudi Heinz Krass has beenlegally established to be valid against the wishes of the establishment.

8 It is only right then that I have the cash from the home equity to pay bills and keep thing in order.According to the validity of the September 13, 2011 Will in the Petitions to the Court nos. 95677 and95751 and the established invalidity of the will racket provisions of the laws in these Petitions, there isno justification for keeping the banking assets of Rudi Heinz Krass suspended other than to insurefurther harm is done to me, Ernst John Krass.

9 I did not receive any confirmation that the banking assets of Rudi Heinz Krass, now inherited by ErnstJohn Krass, have been re-instated with me having complete signing authority as dictated by the will.

10 I have the right to request that the banking assets have been turned over completely to me, ErnstJohn Krass, and the expectation to hear that the banking assets of Rudi Heinz Krass held by TheToronto Dominion Bank be re-instated with me having the same privileges as Rudi Krass had when hewas alive is 100% valid.

11 Please, insure that The Toronto Dominion Bank knows that there is no credible ground for keepingthese banking assets suspended in light of the reality that the will has been "legally" validated.

12 I am sorry for being so persistent in these matters but as has been established, it is the proper andcorrect course of action given that the will was validated through proper legal channels which havebeen obscured by the will racket and everyone being forced to chase their tail.

13 I as not fully aware what had happened on June 21, 2012 with the Affidavit of Witnessing theexecution of the will until this past weekend. But, I am acting upon this legal reality now that I dounderstand the power of what happened on June 21, 2012: there is nothing now that legitimatelystands between the reinstatement of the banking assets of Rudi Heinz Krass held by The TorontoDominion Bank with me, Ernst John Krass, having full authority over them as dictated by the will.

14 Please direct The Toronto Dominion Bank to do what is demanded by Doing Right in thesecircumstances because they are awaiting this instruction from you.

15 The telephone contact for the TD Bank, Westbank Branch, to inform that the banking assets have

been re-instated with me having signing authority and I can now come in is 250 768-5150.




Page 2 of 2

7/31/2012

:ilmQsrsrRy

Form 109 (Rule 22-2 (2) and (7) )

This is the l st affidavit of QUINTINDONALD Davidson in this case andwas made on June 21 ,2012

No. P e5 677KELOWNA Registry

IN TT{E SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

RE: TFIE INHERITANCE OF ERNST JOHN KRASS

AFFIDAVIT OF WITNESSING WILL SIGNING OF'RUDI HEINZ KRASS

[Rule 22-3 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules applies to allforms.J

I, Quintin

Vl4 6Kl, retired, SWEAR (OR AFFIRM) THAT:

I on September 13, 2011, I witnessed Rudi Heinz Krass sign his informal

will/'testamentary document" in GOOD FAITH and the witness signature is that of me, Quintin D.

Davidson. In fact, it was Rudi Krass who asked me to witness his signature on September 13, 2011.

2 I knew Rudi and his family from the 1960's when he worked for my company,

Davidson Brothers Construction, in the Peace River Country.

if you have any further questions concerning the matter of the informal

"ilV"testamentary documenf' of Rudi Heinz Krasso designated Exhibit ,rArr,I can be contacted

as follows:

home:

telephone no.:

301 955 Leon AvenueKELOWNA BC VI4 6KI

250 861 -9344

'r o r r r... r... ....... ..... a.)

swoRN (ORAFFTRMED) BEFORE ME )at . ...fu.........., British Columbia )o1r ......$r:**- ....?..(... ..*'.4..1..?*.o.......... )

aaaaaaaaDalllrTraoaaaa

A commissi 6r-for taking affi davitswithin Briti Columbia

nOBERT J'BI*Y^PHUN.13:,T;friff''8+n

T3:fiL4ffi,$r#'-l^:b:U

E rhl;t OL

Last Will and Testimony

I, Rudi Heinz Krass, being of sound mind leave all my worldly possessions to the sole remainingsurvivor of our family, Ernst John Krass, to do with as he wills.

There are no previous wills and there is no need for any other wills.

Date: theffdayor 1?t ,zotl

witness ff^rr^ fl'l'ff;*,^r Tr

^l J D'qtl I P^sD^(

" referred to ik*Lf N-

&:;;ll*e+-+.'*- ---'*-J'-

ROBERT J. BRYSHUNBarrister & Solicitor

2OO - 1455 ELLIS STREET_KELOWN& ts$, v1Y 2[C

Thls is Exhibir " Athe affidavit ofsworn before rne at

Province of ritish Cof urnbiaday of

n &nitisfr Colurmbialor the Province of British Columbia

ruiPORRELLILAW

' : .I lAr Cstpo.rtl.Ofr

March 21 ,?A1'2Our File No. 1838

Mr. Emst Krass3929 Woodell RoadWest Kelowna, BC V4T lEl

'

Dear Mr. Krass:i.

':

Re: Estate of RUDI HEINZ KFIASS. Eleceased

We acknowledge receipt of your letter dated Marchfile are no longer representing you on this matter.

Yours truly,

PORRELLI tJMt

This is Exhibit,, L ,, referred to in the

affidavit of . Fr.,+.*, . S.b.h. . K,{}.H..

sworl before me, 3t ,.KF.lrP.Y:.|{ tr.,..

''''0,'ffiCD0NAL0'' r' " "' i' i'|'.' r

A Comrnissioner for taking Affidavitsfor British Columbia

.

'17, AAn and confim we have closed our

Per: 1/]'v''

// (

b

Nancy E. Fish

/bc

#321=s1 1gsrft C[i\f€Wesfbcnk,6.C. V4Tffi3

@sltYYV.pg'reH.Go

p2$-'7ffi717I25/0"76,9i5954

Form 92 (Rule 21-5 (4) )

This is the .....[1st/2nd/3rd/etc.]..... affidavitof .............[name]............. in this case

and was made on .......[dd/mmm/yyyy].........

[Style of Proceeding]

AFFIDAVIT OF ADMINISTRATOR

[Rule 22-3 of the Supreme Court Civil Rules applies to all forms.]

I, ................[name]................, of ................[address]................, ................[occupation]................,SWEAR (OR AFFIRM) THAT:

1 .............[name of deceased]............., late of .............[address].............,.............[occupation]............., died on ........[dd/mmm/yyyy]........ at ........................, in theProvince of British Columbia.

2 I have made a careful search and believe the deceased died withouthaving left any will, codicil or testamentary document.

3 The deceased was survived by ........[Identify the applicant and any other person entitledto inherit under sections 82 to 89 of the Estate Administration Act, clear off any person who hasa prior or equal right to apply for the grant and refer to all renunciations or consents filed.]........ .

4 I have made a diligent search and inquiry to ascertain the assets and liabilities of thedeceased.

5 The statement marked Exhibit A to this affidavit discloses the assets and liabilities of thedeceased, irrespective of their nature, location or value, that pass to the deceased's personalrepresentative, together with the names and addresses of the beneficiaries, their relationship tothe deceased and the property passing to them.

6 I believe there are no debts or liabilities for which the estate is or may be liable except asdisclosed in Exhibit A, all of which have been paid [except ........[state whether any consent inwriting has been given]........].

7 I will promptly disclose to the court the existence of any asset or liability that has notbeen disclosed in Exhibit A to this affidavit when I learn of the same.

8 I will administer according to law all the estate that by law devolves to and vests in thepersonal representative of the deceased and I will exhibit a true and perfect inventory of theestate and render a just and true account thereof whenever required by law to do so.

SWORN (OR AFFIRMED) BEFORE ME ) at ...................................., British Columbia ) on ..............[dd/mmm/yyyy].............. . )........................................................................ )

....................................................................................) .......................................................... A commissioner for taking affidavits ) Name of person making the affidavitfor British Columbia )

.....[print name or affix stamp of commissioner].....

HOLD ON HERE!

S. 2 of this form constitutes SUBORNATION OF PERJURY which is a CRIMINALCODE OFFENCE for all single witnessed wills especially when that witness,according to Rule 21-5 (9) of the Supreme Court Act of British Columbia has the rightto swear to or affirm in an affidavit that the will he/she witnessed being signed wasexecuted properly.

In short, since 1996, the wills act of british columbia has imposed a known FRAUD scheme entitledFormal Wills in order to indoctrinate people into accepting that “estates” are for all wills when,according to the English Language, the term “estate” applies solely to the residuals from personshaving died without having left a will. Ergo, “estates” as we have come to known them is WRONGaccording to the English Language and law in the past!

However, by imposing the “estates” label on all wills, the provinces knowingly suborned perjuryby placing s. 2 of Form 92, Affidavit for Seeking Letters of Administration before all single witnessedwills since 1996 as well as imposed EXTORTION on all inheritors of these single witness wills afterthe death of their beloved as the inheritors are NOT being allowed to have the court review the willnor have the witness attest to its validity but instead are being forced to apply for Letters ofAdministration and swear to and affirm a lie just to get access to the assets of their loved one whichconstitutes PROVINCE SANCTIONED EXTORTION just as in olden days where wills were alsoused by the unsavory stealing the land and having an “X” placed on the paper and their people sayingthat they witnessed the signing of the extorted will of the dead victim.

The June 21, 2012 Affidavit of Quintin D. Davidson affirms that the September 13, 2012 will ofRudi Heinz Krass was easily validated against the legal council to the contrary as imposed by TheProvince of British Columbia under the criminal racketeering guidelines of FRAUD, EXTORTIONAND SUBORNATION OF PERJURY.

The court of competent jurisdiction in this matter is The Judge Advocate General and theappropriate and just remedy in the circumstances has already been accepted under The Principlesof Fundamental Justice by this Court previously - April 2, 2012 - just as was NO LO CONTENDOput forth when confronted with the findings of the medical reports and imagery from January 2012

where “the reading of the material” has already dictated that Rudi Krass was murdered byKelowna General Hospital on orders from the illegal and unconstitutional NO CODE policyof hospital administration used to euthanize people with the intend of saving the system considerablefunds both medically and pension wise.

Constitutional Reality

Does the NO CODE policy DENY Everyone their God Given Right to Life, Liberty and Security ofPerson AND the right not to be DEPRIVED of the right to life, liberty and security of personEXCEPT in accordance with The Principles of Fundamental Justice - s. 7 of Canada’s Charter ofRights and Freedoms?

Yes!

Does the NO CODE policy that violates Canada’s Criminal Code section for premeditatedmurder/homicide DENY the medical and ethical obligation of Do No Harm while letting people diewithout providing simple intravenous feeding and hydration along with other simple transfusions?

Yes!

Does the NO CODE policy DENY the moral imperative under The Supremacy of God and the 10Commandments that insures simple life saving measures will always be provided thereby allowingthe person to recover against the “advice” to the contrary by medical persons and imposed by theNO CODE policy?

Yes!

As an unanimous and unambiguous conclusion, the NO CODE Policy is found to beof no effect, invalid, not saved and a gross DENIAL of every reasonable code and The Charterof Rights and Freedoms, s. 7 of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Everyone’s LEGAL Rightsand Canada’s Criminal Code sections dealing with Premeditated Murder/Homicide, which,therefore, demands that simple lifesaving measures MUST ALWAYS be applied so that all personswill have the chance to defy the predictions of the administrators and those making the assumptionsand then making the outcome a foregone conclusion through DENIAL of Everyone’s personal needfor hydration and nutrition and rejuvenating internal organs to restart their nature regenerativeprocess AFTER the failure of the organs was caused by medications prescribed by the medical staff(at Kelowna General Hospital).

However, the presence of NO CODE in medical reporting is really an announcement that the personwas euthanised to save money against all the standards of Canada FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSEOF ISSUING A BLANK CHECK by Her Majesty to those who understand its significance therebyopening up the reality of compensation funds for those negatively affected by the premeditatedmurder/homicide of the Deceased which is patently obvious to have occurred concerning Rudi HeinzKrass.

2 Attached to this requisition is a draft of the order required.

[Check whichever one of the following boxes is correct and complete any required information.]

3 [ ] Each party affected has consented to the order. [/] The evidence in support of the application is:

The medical reports, that were provided with The Petition to The Court no. 95750 on June 29, 2012,affirm that Rudi Heinz Krass was not dying in January 2012 but was made sick and then necessarylife restoring procedures were withheld under orders from NO CODE put in place by Dr. Pistawka -

Exhibit “A” in the Proof - against the reality that Rudi Krass could have been made better andshipped back to St. Paul’s Hospital:

Exhibit “A” - Dr. Kevin J. Pestawka’s January 17, 2012 report IMPOSING NO CODEwithout notifying patients and, by all accounts, is NOT SUPPOSED TO EXIST;Exhibit “B” - Dr. Scott D. Smith’s January 26, 2012 report of death by dehydration and lackof nutrition affirmed;Exhibit “C” - Dr. Steven Andrew Hodge’s December 16, 2011 report;Exhibit “D” - Dr. Petr Polasek’s December 21, 2011 report;Exhibit “E” - December 2012 requisition for a blood test to decide to eliminate a drugtreatment;Exhibit “F” - Dr. Edward W. Welsh’s September 16, 2011;Exhibit “G” - September 16, 2012 radiological report confirming good health of kidneysyet Rudi Krass died from “renal failure” due to lack of intravenous hydration and feeding;Exhibit “H” - Dr. Polasek’s November 11, 2011 report;Exhibit “I” - September 26, 2011 radiological report AFFIRMING severe case of“constrictive pericarditis” where the heart’s pericardium - outer lining - has calcified to 40%of the cavity of Rudi Krass’ lower ventricle so it was caught FOR NO REASON really late;

Note: “constrictive pericarditis” is a known medical complication of open heart surgery!Exhibit “J” - 2012 Property assessment on ranch in Peace River Country;Exhibit “K” - 2012 Property assessment on other parcel of ranch in the Peace RiverCountry;Exhibit “L” - January 4, 2012 filing of KGH prescription of Macrobid;Exhibit “M” - internet report on Macrobid and who should NOT be prescribed thismedication - Rudi Krass was in this category;Exhibit “N” - pictures affirming allergic reaction from KGH on January 18, 2012;

3 on Monday, July 23, 2012, I received notice of The Province of British Columbia

attempting to circumvent the rules for responding to Petitions to The Court and serve Form 67 in

response to my Petition after the alloted 21 days fully well known to them, the email receipt is

designated Exhibit “A”.

4 the Form 66, Petition to The Court stipulates as follows:

Orders, including orders granting the relief claimed, may be made against you, without anyfurther notice to you, if you fail to file the response to petition within the time for response.

Time for response to petition

A response to petition must be filed and served on the petitioner(s),

(a) if you were served with the petition anywhere in Canada, within 21 daysafter that service,

5 the date of service as affirmed in The Affidavit of Service, designated Exhibit “B”,

was June 29, 2012 and, according to all calendars, July 23 falls beyond the 21 day time limit and

makes the Form 67 filed with the court moot and stricken from the record and cannot be used

in the court proceedings for Petition to The Court no. 95750!

6 the legal council for The Province of British Columbia is fully aware that there are

no exceptions for extending this time frame especially since “The Constitutional and Administrative

Law Group” is just that a large building filled with lawyers who only deal with legal matters day in

and day out.

7 I, therefore, have the right to proceed with Petition to The Court no. 95750 in

accordance with the court’s standards of “without a hearing and upon reading the materials” to have

the proper Orders Sought to remedy the resulting circumstances accordingly.

Documents

You'Ve Already Chosen to Her Majesty