WWN±I 486 NANPONER PERSONNEL RHO TRINING IN SYSTEM ACOUISXTIGI: 1/1A BIDLIOGRAPNY(U) AIR FORCE HUMAN RESOURCES LABMRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH E BOYLE JUL 86 RFNRL-TP-86-?

UNCLASSIFIED F/O 519 NL

momflflflflfl

Ail

I1111 mI lll122I-M

MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART

NATIONAL BUREAU OF SIANARS --%3-A

.fir.

AFHRL-TP-86-7

MANPOWER, PERS.NNEL , AND TRAINING IN

IR FORCE SYSTEM ACQUISITION: A BIBLIOGRAPHY

HU Edward Boyle

o mM WigLOGISTICS AND HUMAN FACTORS DIVISION

A Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433-6503

NaJuly 1986

R inurim per for Period Septeuber - Dsador 1 95

ES0U Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

R:'.4 E

S LABORATORY

DTICSLECTE AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMANDAUG 1 4 1986 BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS 78235-6601

Db 8 1.4 04,S

- " ' ,, - - - '.*U "

NOTICE

menGoerinmt draig, Specifications. or other data are used for anypurpos Other than fit connection with a definitely Governmnt-relatedprecurense. the Wilted Stts 6overwinnt incurs no reponsibility or anyobligation whatsoever. The fact that the Goverinmnt my have formul ated orIN any waY supplied the said drawings, specifications. or other data. isnet to be regarded 1W ituiton Or Otherwise In any mannr construed. asliceAni the holder, or any other peran or corporation.. or as conveyingany rights or permission to mnfacture, use, or sell any patentedInvention that my in any way be related thereto.

The Public Affairs office has reviewed this paper, and it is releasable tothe National Technical Information Service, where It will be available tothe general public, including foreign nationals.

This paper has been reviewed and is approved for Publication.

UILLIM B. ASKREN, Acting Technical AdvisorLogistics and Ikinn Factors Division

DONALD C. TETMEER, Colonel, USAFChief- Logistics and Nmun Factors Division

-4

-4 Z

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

JL 000AS10WATON DOWGRAINGS04DW proved for public releate; distribution Is =limited.

1000000-WORANIATIMREPRT NMBMS. MONITOING ORGANIZATION EPORT NUMBER(S

4L NAME OF PIMORMII ORGANIZTION L. OuAC1 SYIO & a NAM OF MOMT'.AN OWGANIRATION

Air Forcii Humn e. sus Labartoy I FL RGL ADONSS M, Sff SW AWC 7L ADDRESS W, Sbean mW Coe)

vriot-pattee Mr Fe Base. Obio 45433-4503

OL. NAME OF PUV4DGISPONSORING 4L. OFFICE SYMBOL 9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

9L ADDRESS CR, kern. aW d WCaft) 10. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERSB rooks Air force Base, Tuas 782354603 PF)GA PRIT- TS IWORS WT

_ _1._TITLE_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 22WS 1710 00 [1

Manpower, Personnel, and Training in System Acqisition: A Bibliographly

13. TYPE OF MEOK I,3L TWME COVERED 14.. DAT OF REPORT a M oA. *Day) Ii,. PAGE COUNTSInterim FPROM So St TO - .~DO jI_ July 1966 16

16. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION

17. COSATI COGGS 14. SUBJECT TERMS (Conaft on ,wem af noceawy and i*.ft by block numbs)FIELD GROUP 9UGDP HANNAN personnel weapon system design

01 0 huimn factors training06 06 -nowr wee on ustem ac tisition

is. ABSTRACT (Condeu an rows if niweewy mwd idoI~ wo a block nwmber)

This Is a bibliography covering literature relevant to manpower, personnel, and training (NPT) analysisand planning during the weapon system design cycle. It covers docuents produced by all Services, withparticular ahasis an the NAWMAN (Hardware vs. M"nower) Comparability Analysis Method.

20. OISTRIUUTIONIAVAAIUTY OF ABSTRACT 21. ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION*UNCLASSIIEDANIMITED Q SAME As OPr E3 on jUSER Unclassified

22a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL -22b. TELEPHONE (Include Arq@ Code) 22c. OFFICE SYMBOL.NnyA. Cif. STIWFO Office 1 (612) 536-3677 1)L/SRI

DO FORM 1473. 64 6 3 APR ediom may be used untl exhausted. SECURAITY CLICATION OF -wig AasAN ocherditlons uo obsolete Unclassified

WIL Toial Poer -7 July lM

IMIum, USOSL M =AmIN INSISTE ACQUISITION: A 81OLIOPUNY

Eumrd Soqe

LOGISTICS N IIIM FACTOS DIVISIONVrlgbt-Patthrsm Mr Force loe, Ohio 45433-6603

Reviewed by

Robert C. JohmsonCief, Combat Logistics Branch

SmWtted for publication by

Villim S. AskrmActing Technical Mvisor

Logistics and imn Factors Division

This publication Is primarily a working paper. It Is published solely to documnt work performad.

This bibliogrepby lists references to the literature an mrie e, personnel, and training(IPT) and i. factors analysis related to the systo acquisition process. The list encmasesresearch reports. guides an uamMs. and case studies Issued by all three Services and byDeparbien of DeaI e contractors. The HAMM (HARhware vs. NAIpuur) Co arability Nathodolopof the *p and iW, and AI's antecedents in the Air Forces are wpihas d. Dociuentsdistributed sine 1I are featured, but IW.Ant earlier work, going back to the 1l9t, Is alsoIncluded.

3I

!.

PEFWACE

The Integrated analysis and evaluation of mapower, personnel, and traiing (WIT)Issues In the systam design and acquisition process has been an abiding Interest of theAir Force Nowm ftsources Laboratory. That intet is reflected, In part, in tworesearch and develOpluit efforts currently undeWy within the Logistics and HamnFactors Divisie: Task Identification and Evaluation System (TIES) - Woft Unit171040-31; and Suall Unit Maintenance hanpower Analyses (SiMIA) - Work Unit171000-04. Literature searching and cataloging efforts supporting both of these WorkUnits have produced large docent files. It semned timly to put together abibliografl tailored to the problem of WT planning and analysis In system acquisitionto aid other researchers In this topic area.

Susan Stiller, University of Dayton Research Institute, helped to track downdacumnts and to verify bibliographic data. Terr Kerr, Universal Enorg System, alsohelped In cataloging, typing lists, and kinr chores. Dr. William B. Askren gavevaluable advice on the content of the biblfograpl. To all, all thanks.

,- I I I I ....... -vr , , .- , .ii

MANPOWER, PERSONEL, AA TRAININ INSYSTEM ACQUISITION: A BIBLIOGRPHY

INTIOUCTION

Making better, earlier estimates of the mnpower, personnel, and training (10T) impacts ofnew system has been an important gal of the Air Force Human Resources Laboratory (AFHRL) formWn years. Coesequetly, several useful methods, models, and procedures - which togethercomprise theM T technology bass - have been developed. The other Services, too, have madeimportant contributions to this field and have recently moved ahead In packaging andproceduralizing IT technology for practical application in military acquisitions.

This bibliography lists source documents relevant to NPT requirements estimation and designinteraction during the weapon system acquisition process. The bibliography emphasizes Serviceliterature - published, not-yet-publIshed, and unpublished - on HARMHAN (NARhwre vs. M4ANpower)applications in the Army and Navy. Also emphasized are AFRL technical publications going backas far as the late 19M which allow one to trace the lineage of HARMAN to the Air Force'sCoordinated Hman Resources Technology (CNRT), and, later, to the Acquisition of SupportableSystem Evaluation Technology (ASSET). Also Included, though less thoroughly, are human factorsstudies and technical publications relevant to the system design and acquisition process. Themyriad of Department of Defense Directives, Air Force Regulations, and Mlitary Standards andSpecifications related to NPT, human factors, and logistics tn acquisition are excluded sincethey have been cataloged elsewhere. Refer to the four Akman Associates's (1983a, 193b, 1983c,1983d) studies for exsample lists.

An attempt has been made to cover the field comprehensively since 190, and to include thevery latest literature. Neeting this latter goal has meant, in sam instances, citing works thatare not, as this is written, In final published form or available to the public. eeting theforer goal has mant, especially In the NARDMAN area, Including documents whose informationcontent duplicates or substantially overlaps information found in other documents. In choosingitems for Inclusion, the urge to be thorough often overruled the need for discrimination.

The renewed emphasis in the Air Force on better, earlier MPT planning for developing weaponsystems is taking several forms. One is the establishment of an MPT focal point within theAeronautical System Division (ASO) of the Air Force System Command to integrate and manage MPTanalysis efforts. Another Is the call for wore coordinated, concerted applications of existingMPT technology, and for improved NPT technologies with greater transition potential. Theproposed Air Force Manpower, Personnel, and Training Information Systen (1PTIS) for tracking MPTrequirements and resources for all new weapon systems is an Important new application that willbuild on existing knowledge and technology.

These new efforts should benefit greatly from ready access to the accumulated knowledge andexperience In MPT analysis eodied by this bibliography. To be sure, a review and analysis ofthis accretion of literature would be even more beneficial and should be done. In particular,the potential utility of the MAROMAN approach In meting Force PT analysis needs now and in thefuture must be determined. The present effort is a small but perhaps important step toward thatlarger gal.

1

-. - I

BIILIO APH

Akman Assoiates. (1982, October), Functional description of the HAINAN information (HIS)(Contract N133 0 0-00-6). Silver Spring, ND.

Mm Assoates. (1983a, January). An assessment of manpower, personnel, and training planningIn the USAF acquisition poces. Report No. 1 for AF/IUXXX. Silver Spring. MD.

M~mmn Associates. (1963b, April). Enhancing manpower. personnel, and training planning In theUSAF ac Ition process (AD-630 514). Report for A/NUX. Silver Spring, NO.

Akmen Associates. (1963g, April). NT acquisition policy: Problem and plans. Presentation forNPT Committee, Aerospace Industries Association. Los Anglea. CA.

Mme Associates. (1963d). Veapon system acquisition process in the U.S. Air Force.(pamphlet). Silver Spring, M.

Mmmi Associates. (19865, Deceber). CAD/MAN: Feasibility of applying computer-aided designtechnolog to manpower determination in weapon system developmmnt (S8IR Project, Contract No.NDO34-5-CO071 ). Unpublished manuscript.

Armstrong, , A Noores, S. (190, June). Air Force mnpower, personnel, and training: Rolesand Interactions (Rand Report R-2429-AF). Santa Monica, CA.

Askron, W. (1971). Human resources data In system analysis and design. Air Force ResearchReviow, 14 9-2.

Askron, e, , Eckstrand, G. (1960. Second Quarter). Human resource considerations from conceptthrough devolopmnt. Defense Management Journal, 16() 7-11.

Askrono V., A Lint, L. (1975), Human resources data In system design trade studies. HumanFactors, 17(1), 4-12.

Baker, C., Johnson, J., Malone, N.. A Malone, T. (1979, July). Human factors engineering forNavy weapon system acquisition. San Diego, CA: Essex Corporation for Naval Sea SystemsCommand.

alcom, L., & Mannle, E. (1982, Septeomber). Estimating the manpower, personnel, and trainingreirments in the Army's Corps support weapon system using the HAROAN methodology(Technical Report 564. AD-A134 037). Alexandria, VA: ArsW Research Institute.

gartlow, 6 (1985. Summer). Institutionalizing Air Force reliability and maintainability (RAN).Air Force Journal of Logistics, 9-15.

Barton, N,, Purvis, No, Stuart, J,, & allory, V. (1964, January). A queuing model fordetermining system manning and related support requirements (ANL-TR-64-21, AD-434 803).

right-Patterson AF8, OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.

1 All documents listed have been deposited in the Technical Documents Center at the

Logistics and Human Factors Division (AFHRL), Wright-Pattrson Air Force Base, Ohio, and will bemaintained there as a service to interested and qualified researchers.

Betague. N., Kennelly, 0., auta, F., A White, T. (1978, December). Manpower planning for nowweapon system (AD-AO66 928). Washington. DC: Logistics Management Institute.

Blanco, T., & CherooN tz, 6. (1979, June). Forecasting manpower requirements for a now weapons (AD-A131 611). Institute of Management Sciences Meeting.

loden, R,, mtler, W., Insley, P.. A McNichols, 6. (1983. April). Estimation of nanpowerrequirements for weapon system in the concept exploration phase (Technical Report 8217-1).Falls Church, VA: Management Consulting and Research.

Bonder., S.. Cherry. P., Miller, 6.. & Spaulding, S. (1984, May). Integrating MPT into the systemacquisition process-Iplementation of the Oepay-aonder approach (Research Note 84-73,AD-AI41 954). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute.

Booz, Allen, A Hamilton, Inc. (1985). Air Force mnpower, Eersonnel, and training (NPT) systemsmodel course. MPT Systems model student textbook (2 volumes, draft). Wright-Patterson AFB,OH: Aeronautical Systems Division, Deputy for Simulators.

Boyle, E., A Preidis, R. (1983, March). ASSET - Acquisition of supportable systems evaluationtechnology. Proceedings, 00 Human Factors Engineering Technical Advisory Group. El Paso,Tk.

Carroll, R., Goodman, 0., Hritz, R., Chiplock, L., A Trump, T.R. (1984, March). Logisticalsupport considerations In the design and acquisition of maintenance training simulators(AFHRL-TR-83-S8. AD-A140 192). Lowry AFB, CO: Training System Division, Air Force HumanResources Laboratory.

Chief of Naval Operations (OP-112). (1982, September). HARDMAN Life Cycle Cost Handbook:Shipboard electronics. ashington, OC.

, Chief of Naval Operations (OP-112). (1982, September). Training Requirements DeterminationHandbook. Washington. DC.

Chief of Naval Operations (OP-112). (1983, September). HAROMAN methodology: Equipment/system/subsystem (HAROMAN Publication No. 84-01). Washington, OC.

Chief of Naval Operations (OP-112). (1983, September). Navy program manager's HARDMAN guide toearly MPT planning (HAMAN Publication No. 84-00, AD-F630 734). Washington, DC.

Chief of Naval Operations (Op-112). (1983, September). User's guide to HAROMAN life cycle costsystem: Shipboard electronics (HAROMAN Publication No. 84-06). Washington, OC.

Chief of Naval Operations (P-112). (1984, January). HARDMAN methodology: Total ship (HARDMANPublication No. 84-03). Washington, DC.

Chief of Naval Operations (OP-112). (1984, March). MPT data sources directory: Analyst guide(HNARDMAN Publication No. 64-14. AD-F630 733). Washington, DC.

. Chief of Naval Operations (OP-112). (1985, March). HAROAN methodology: Aviation (HARDMAN*Publication Mo. 84-02). Washington, DC.

Christensen, J. (1985, January). Descriptive account of human factors in system development inthe U.S. Arv, Air Force, and Navy. Unpublished manuscript.

3

Coogan. C. (1964). Front-end analysis -- A Mthod that works. Proceedings. Society ofLogistics Engineers Ninetoeth Annual SYmpos.IM. Daton. ON.

Council. G. (1964, September). Inserting human factors considerations earlier In the weaponSystem acquisition process. Unpublished manuscript.

Council. G.. & Akum, A. (1964, First Quarter). Planning for manpower and training needs on nowNavy weapon system. Defense Management Journal, 22-28.

Czuchry. A.. Doyle, K.. Fresh, J., Baran, H.. & Oiterly. D. (1978, Septer). Digitalavionics Information system (DAIS): Training requirements analysis model user's guide(DAFNL-T-78-56(II). AD-MD1 389). Wright-Patterson A13. ON: Advanced System Division, AirForce Hom Resources Laboratory.

Czuchry. A., Kistler, R., Glasier. J.. Bristol, N., Baran. .. Dieterly. 0. (1979. April).Digital avionics informtion system (DAIS): Reliability and maintainability model user'sguide (AFHRL-TR-78-(II). AD-A068 826). Wright-Patterson AFB, ON: Advanced SystemDivision, Air Force Numan Resources Laboratory.

Depay, No., & Boder. S. (1982, March). Integration of WT supply and deand and the systemacquisition process (Research Note 82-16). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute.

Dick, R., & McCallum, N. (1963, February). Design guide to operator ..d technician requirements(Vols. 1-6) (lROC SR-83-14. A-073 358 - B073 363). San Diego, CA: Naval PersonnelResearch and Development Center.

Dynamics Research Corporation. (1963, January). Application of the HARDPAN methodology to theArmy remotely piloted vehicle (AiV). Volume I: Technical report (Contract No. 956-320).Wilmington. MA: Jet Propulsion Laboratory. (Draft).

Dynamics Research Corporation. (1963, January). Application of the HAROAN methodology to theArmy remotely piloted vehicle (RPV). Volie II: Appendices (Contract No. 956-320).Wilmington, NA: Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

Dynamics Research Corporation. (1983, January). Application of the HARDMAN methodology to theundergraduate jet flight training system (VTXTS) (Technical Report R-385U). Wilmington, RA.

Dynamics Research Corporation. (1985. April). HARDMAN methodology guide. Volume I: Managersguide (Contract No. MO A903-81-C-0561). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute.

Dynamics Research Corporation. (1965, April). HARDPAN methodology guide. Volum II: Problemdefinition (Contract No. NS A903-81-C-0561). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute.

Dynamics Research Corporation. (1965, April). HARDMAN methodology guide. Volume III:Requiremets analysis (Contract No. No A903-81-C-0561). Alexandria, VA: Army ResearchInstitute.

Dynamics Research Corporation. (1985, April). KARONAN methodology guide. Volume IV:Interpretation and evaluation (Contract No. MD A903-81-C-0561). Alexandria, VA: ArmyResearch Institute.

Dynamics Research Corporation. (1985, April). HARDMAN mthodology guide. Volume V: Analysissupport Information (Contract No. 1D A903-81-C-0561). Alexandria, VA: Armw ResearchInstitute.

4

UVwML O"O& .:."fi;-

Eckstrand, . (191, July). Manpower factors in system acquisition (AFHRL-TP-81-14. AD-AlO2429). Uright-Patterson AFB, OH: Logistics and Technical Training Division. Air Force NumnResources Laboratory.

Eckstrand, . (1980. August). Technology projection: Manpower and logistics factors in weaponsystem development (AFHRL-TR-80-2, AD-AO88 314). right-Patterson AFB. OH: Logistics andTechnical Training Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Eckstrand. .. Askrea, V., & Snyder, N. (1967). Human Resources engineering - A now challenge(AD-70 115). Human Factors. 9 (). 517-520.

Foley, J.. Jr. (1978, Septouber). Impact of advanced maintenance data and task oriented trainingtechnologies on maintenance, personnel, and training system (AFHL-TR-78-2S, AD-AO63 279).right-Patterson AFS. OH: Advanced Systems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Friedman, F.. Rhode, A.. A O'Connor, F. (1981. March). integration of manpower, personnel, andtraining issues from the material system acquisition process into the planning, programing.and budgeting system (Technical Report 526. AD-All 7553). Alexandria, VA: Arwy ResearchInstitute.

Fuchs, F., A Inab, K. (1981, March). Design for the maintainer: Final report (NAD-79218-60).garminster, PA: Naval Air Development Center.

Soclowski, J., Glasier, J., Kistler, R., Bristol, N., & Saran, H. (1980, August). Digitalavionics information system (DAIS): Life cycle cost impact modeling system - Reliability,maintainability, and cost model (RMCM) - Description and users Euide (AFHRL-TR-79-66,AD-AD89 045). Wright-Patterson APS. ON: Logistics and Technical Training Division, AirForce Human Resources Laboratory.

G Boclouski, J., King. G., Ronco, P., A Askren, W. (1978. March). Integration and application ofIan resource technologies in weapon system design: Coordination of five human resource

technologies (AFHRL-TR-76-6(I), AD-A053 680). Wright-Patterson AFS, OH: Advanced SystemsDivision, Air Force Human Re;ources Laboratory.

Boclouski, J., King. G.. Ronco, P., A Askren. W. (1978, March). Integration and application ofhuman resource technologies in weapon system design: Processes for the coordinatedapplication of five human resource technologies (AFHRL-TR-78-6(II), AD-AO53 681).Wright-Patterson AFB, ON: Advanced System Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Goclowski, J.. King, G., Ronco, P.. & Askren, W. (1978. May). Integration and application ofhuman resource technologies in weapon system design: Consolidated data base functionalspecification (AFHRL-TR-78-(1I1), AD-AOS9 298). Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: AdvancedSystems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Goclowski, J.. Peskoe, S.. LoFaso, A., & Baran, H. (1980. August). Air Force personnelavailabilty analysis: Application techniques of the personnel availability model (PAN)(AFHRL-TR-79-67. AD-AO68 801). right-Patterson AFi. OH: Technical Training Division, AirForce Human Resources Laboratory.

Guphill, R., Herlihy, 0., A Oneal, J. (1985, May). Man integrated system technology (MIST)users guido. Wilmington, MA: Dynamics Research Corporation. (Draft).

&

p * ~ ~ !

Helmuth, Re, Conroy, J., A Schwalm, R. (1984, August). Application of AMORE methodology tomanpower, personnel, and training front-end analysis of now material systems (Research Nte84-118, AD-A147 191). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute.

Witz, A., & Purifey, ., Jr. (1980, August). Maintenance training simulator design andacquisition (AFHRL-TR-80-23, AD-A089 149). Lowry AFB, CO: Logistics and Technical TrainingDivision, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Hull. Jo. & Lockhart, G. (1962. September). Barriers to fully implementing integrated logisticssupport (ILS) in system acquisition as perceived !y ILS managers and program managers at theAeronautical Systems Division (Thesis LSSR-36-82, AD-A122 979). Wright-Patterson AFB. OH:Air Force Institute of Technology.

Kennelly. 0. (1978, July). Manpower planning for the Navy Viking (S-3A) aircraft (Report No.ML81-3). Washington, CC: Logistics Management Institute.

Kennelly, 0. (1978, October). Manpower planning for the Army Patriot air defense missilesystem (Report No. WN HL801-7). Washington. DC: Logistics Management Institute.

Kennelly, 0. (1978, September). Manpower planning for the Army tactical fire direction system(TACFIRS) (Report No. W N 0l0-S). Washington, DC: Logistics Management Institute.

King, L, & Askren, W. (1979, September). Human resources, logistics, and cost factors inweapon system development: Demonstration in conceptual and validation phases of aircraftsystem acquisition (AFHRL-TR-79-28(I), ADOA75 272). Wright-Patterson AFB, ON: AdvancedSystems Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

*, King, ., & Askren, W. (1980. September). Human resources, logistics, and cost factors inweapon system development: Project sumary (AFHRL-TR-80-8, AD-A089 708). Wright-PattersonAFS, OH: Logistics and Technical Training Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Liberati, G, Egber, 0., French, J., & Preidis, R. (198S, Deceober). Asset users guide:Application (AFHRL-TR-6-25(), AD-A162 688). Wright-Patterson AFS, OH: Logistics andHuman Factors Division, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Lint, L.. Loy, S.. Brock, G., & Potempa, K. (1973, August). Predicting maintenance task* difficulty and personnel skill requirements based on design parameters of avionics

subsystems (AFHRL-TR-72-75, AD-768 415). Wright-Patterson AFD, OH: Advanced SystemsDivision, Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.

Maher, F., & York, M. (1974, December). Simulating maintenance manning for nw weapon systems:Maintenance manpower management during weapon system development (AFHRL-TR-74-97(l), AD-AOl1968). Wright-Patterson AFS, OH: Advanced Systems Division, Air Force Human ResourcesLaboratory.

Management Consulting and Research, Inc. (1980, January). HARDMAN manpower requirementsdetermination: Recomended set of manpower estimating tools (NCR TR-7803-3). Unpublishedmanuscript.

Management Consulting and Research, Inc. (1960, September). Enhancements to the manpowerdetermination model (MRC TR-7912-1). Unpublished manuscript,

v6

, *s

Managemet Consulting and Research, Inc. (1963, September). Deonstration of the early-onmanpower, requirements estimation methodology: Nm Abram mat. battle tank (MCR-TR-217-3).Unpublished manuscript.

Mnagumet Consulting and Research, Inc. (1965, April). Tri-service applicability of theearly-ON !!!I=we requirements estimatio. methodology (NCR 8317-1). Unpublished manuscript.

Management Consulting and Research, Inc* (1965. May). Long ramge enlisted manpower requirementsestimation (NCR-TR8417-1)e Unpublished muscript.

Nauele, T., A Risser, 0. (1964. February). Estimating manpower, personnel. and trainingrequrmits early In the weapon system acquisition process: Application of the HARDMAN

mthodelogy to the Army's division support weapon system. (Technical Report 616, AD-A44IM3), Alexandria, VA: ArmW Research Institute.

Mtlick, R., $"erer D., Xnerr, i., & Chiorini. J. (1960, September). Cost and trainingeffectiveness analysis in the ArsW life cycle systems management model. (Technical Report503. AD-A109 198). Alexandria, VA: Arow Research Institute.

Mftanus, J. (1979, July). Equipmnt comparability techniques used during early system design(AFNRL-TR-79-24, AD-AO71 411). Wright-Patterson AF8, ON: Advanced System Division, AirForce Human Resources Laboratory.

Neute, F. (1978). Manpower planning for the guided missile frigate (Report No. WN 1.801-2).Washington, CC: Logistics Management Institute.

Nauta, F. (1978). Manpower planning for the Marine Corps CH-53-E heavy lift helicopter (ReportN. VN 1180148). Washington, DC: Logistics Management Institute.

O'Brien, L., BoYlston, 0.. & Kistler, R. (1964, June)* Early training estimation system (ETES)final report. Appendix 1: Users guide: Automated resource and cost estimation technique,(Research Note 844-2. AD-A142 543). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute.

O'Brien, L6. Boylston, D., & White, R, (1984, June). Early training estimation system (ETES)final report. Appendix N: Users guide: Media selection (Research Note 84-61,* AD-Al 42563)o Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute.

O'Brien, L,, A Kistler, R. (1964, June). Early training estimation system (ETES) final report.Appendix 6: Users guide: System description technolMg (Research Note 84-80. AD-A142750). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute.

O'Brien, L., & Wagner, N. (1964, June). Early training estimation system (ETES) final report,Appendix J: Users guide: Automated planning and scheduling techniques for individual andcollective training plan (Research Note 84-63, AO-AI42 751). Alexandria, VA: Army ResearchlIsti tuae

O'Brient Lo. Wagner, N., A Modica, B. (1964, June). Early training estimation system (ETES)* final report. Appendix F: Users guide (Research Note 84-79, AD-AI42 741). Alexandria,

VA: Army Research Institute.

* O'Connor, F., Fairall, R., A irdseye, E. (1964, January). Determination of manpower,personnel,* and training requirements: A synthesis of case study findings (Research NoteW434, AD-AI37 708). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute.

Paulsen, R., Vain&, R., 41 Zacks. L. (1971. February). Using logistics models in system designand early support planning (Rand Report R-5504%U. AD-724 690). Santa Monica, CA.

Potter, L., & Disterly, 0, (1174, Augst). Methods for predicting and assessing the Impact oftochnology oe human resource Parameters: Report of the literature (AFHPIL-Th-74-71 * AD-AMOO061). Vrisht-Patterson AFS, ON: Advanced Systems Division, Air Force Numan ResourcesLaboratory.

Preldis, R. (1964, Septmer. Compuerized technology package - ASSET: Test and evaluation(AWRL-R-644, AD-A146 486)o Wright-Patterson AFB, ON: Logistics and Human FactorsDivision, Air Force Numa Resources Laboratory,

Price. Ho. Fiorello. N., Lowry. J.. Smith. N.. A Kidd. N. (1960, J)uly)* The contribution ofhuman factors in military system development - methodological considerations (TechnicalReport TR-476, AD-AlOl 877). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute.

Promisel, Do, Mortel, C., Kaplan, Jo, Marcus. A.. A liittemburg, J. (196, January). Reverseengineering: Humen factors,* manpower, Personnel,* and training i. the weapon systemacquisition process (Technical Report 659, AD-AlS? 693). Alexandria, VA: Army ResearchInstitute*

Rhode, A., Skinner, F., Mlliin, J., Friedman, F., Franco, No, A Carroll, R. (1980, October).Mn~power , pemnel, and training requirements for material acquisition (Report RP-80-27,AM-A097 6S6). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute,

* Richards, E. (1962, July). Building and operating the logistics composite model (LCON) for newweapon systems (AS-T-82-S03, AD-AI27 536). Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Aeronauticalsystems Division*

Risser, 0., A lerger. P. (1964, Septeer). Arm NARDNAN: Its origin, evaluation, implemen-tation to date. Unpublished manuscript.

Rossmissi, P.. Tillman, I., Rigg, K.. A Best, P. (1963, Hsvember). Job assessment softwaresystem (WASS) for analysis of weapon system personnel requirements (Research Report 1355.AD-AI22 031). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute.

Saver, D., Doe, R., A Askren. V. (1960, March). Expert estimate method of generating* maintenance and manpower data for propoed Air Force system: Users guide (AFNRL-TR-79-80,

AD-MAO8 99). Wright-atterson AiD. OH: Advanced Systems Division, Air Force NumnnResources Laborsaory

Sewqer, Co, Fiorello, N., Kidd, Jo, A Price, No (1961. July). Measuring and enhancing theceetribution of humsn factors In military system development: Case studies of theapplication of Impat assessment methodologies (Technical Report TR-519). Alexandria, VA:Army Research Institute*

Seidel, R., & W1agner. N. (1960, February). Front-end analysis to aid eMing trainingsystems: Vorkshop summary MAR~RO Special Report SR-ETS-0-3, AD-AI02 536). Washington,DC: Human Resources Research Organization.

Stackfloth, 1* (1964, September). Test and evaluation of qualitative porinnel requirementsInformation (ANRL-IR4-65, AD-GO? 761)o * right-Patterson AiD. OH: Aerospace MedicalResearch Laboratory.

Sullivan. Do (1981, Mrch). SYStem design characteristics and user Skills: A literaturereview (PPROC-71-81 .9. AD-A120 694). San Diego, CA: Naval Personnel Research andDevelopmnt centar.

Susalla, P. (1964, December). An application of ANORS (analysis of military organizationaleffectiveness) to the Charles Fe Adam class guided missile destroyer (AD-Al 5 291)eaterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School Thesis.

Tatoeer, Do (1974, April Estimating and controlling manpower requiremets for new system:A concept and approach (AnftI-Th-74-31 * AD-A778 636). Wright-Patterson AFS. ON: AdvancedSystem Division, Air Force Hamae Resources Laboratory.

Tanior 0.35S Nody. No (1974, December),, Simulating mintenance manning far new Systems:Building and operating a simlation model (AFHRL-TRl[497(), AD-ADll 967). Wright-Patterson AFB, ON: Advanced System Division, Air Force Numn Resources Laboratory.

Thomas, E.L.. A Deem. R.Ne (1964, March). Unified database development program. (AFHRL-TR-83-12 AD-A140 309). Wright-Patterson AFB, ON: Logistics and Human Factors Division, Air

* Forc Human Resources Laboratory

Themes, Eo. A Hankies, Re (1160. January). Use of human resources data In weapon systemdesign: Identification of data/data system and related technology (AFHRLTR-79-36, AD-A060596). Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Advanced Systems Division, Air Force Human ResourcesLaboratry

Tufano, Do. a Evans, Re (1962, April). The prediction of training device effectiveness (Report613. AD-AlU 937). Alexandria. VA: Arwy Research Institute.

* U.S. General Accounting Office. (1981, January). Effeciees of U.S. Forces can beincreased through improved weapon system design (P3RD 81-17, AD-All4 237). Washington. DC:Report to the Congress.

U.S, General Accounting office, (19610 December). Guidelines for assessing whether humanfactors were considered in the weapon system acquisition process (FPCO-82-5). Wshington.Be.

U.S. General Accounting Office. (1965, Septeer). The Arey can better integrate manpower.personnel,* and training into the weapon system acquisition process (SAO-NSIAD-85-1 54).Washington, DC: Report to the ArsW.

Watsn Pe, I Hbestreit, V. (1963, October). Manpower, personnel, and training technologyworking grou report. IDA/OS reliability and maintainability study (Record Document 0-35,AD-A137 334)o Washington, DC: Institute for Defense Analyses,

Wddle, Pe, a Fulkerson Go (10, Second Quarter). Forecasting the human resource costs ofNavy weAN system* Deene Mngement Journal,* 16(2). 13-19.

*Wsslings Re* Nal To, Veable, C,, Cuptill, Re, A Eves, L, (1965. January). ArymRfamiliarization report (Report E-9743U. AD-A164 626). Wilmington, NA: Dynamcs ResearchCorporain

White, T. (1979, April). Manpower planning for the A-l0 (Report No. N 19.601-4). (roe).Washington, DC: Logistics Mlanagement Institute.

whili0 1 9

Nite. T. (1979. Apr11). Nanpower planing for the F-lB (Report 1b. GPIT/ NM4UO-Uaskington, K: Logistics rmagment Institute.

Site. To (1911 Aprl). Nanning of recently fielded system: Case study of the Air Force E-3A(MOAC) (AD-F U 626.'Vaskingtmn. DC: Logistics Mamagamnt Institute.

Ziinrman, V., Butler, Re., Gray, V.. Rosenberg, LU. &Risser, 0. (1164, August). Evaluation ofthe 033MN (Hardware vse Manpower) comparability metmodology (Technical Report 644).Alexandria, VA: Amy Research Institute*

10