Upload
rob-van-den-dam
View
491
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A European perspective on the Telecommunications Industry
Citation preview
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
How Recession and the Empowerment of Consumers
impact the Telecommunications Industry
- A European Perspective Rob van den Dam
Global Communications Sector Leader IBV
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
2
Agenda
Global CMO Survey
2
Driving Customer Advocacy
Global Telecom Consumer Survey
Industry Dynamics – 4 key trends
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
3
Telecommunications Solutions Lab (TSL)
Telecommunications Research Lab
TSL China &
Telecom Research Lab (Beijing)
TSL North America (Austin, Texas)
Japan (Tokyo
Satellite TSL)
TSL Israel &
Telecom Research Lab
(Haifa Satellite TSL)
Telecom Research Lab
(New Delhi)
TSL LATAM (Sao Paulo,
Brazil Satellite TSL)
TSL Europe (La Gaude &
Montpellier, France)
TSL Russia (Moscow Satellite TSL)
South Africa (Johannesburg, Satellite TSL)
ASEAN (Kuala Lumpur
Satellite TSL)
TSL India (Bangalore Satellite TSL)
Telecommunications is IBM’s #1 research focus
Worldclass Partner
Ecosystem
Mobile Web Services
Centers of Excellence
Institute for Business
Value
Telecom Research
Labs
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
4
The IBM Institute for Business Value creates fact based
thought leadership that help clients realize business value
Future
Agendas
Value Realization
Studies
3 to 10 year industry outlook
with action oriented next steps
In-depth assessment of today’s
critical issues, opportunities, etc
CXO
Surveys
Chief Officiers studies – CEO,
CIO, CMO, CFO, CHRO, etc.
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Mobile data explodes
Consolidation continues
5
Consumers are seizing control
OTT providers thrive
The process of telecom
operators expanding
outside their home
markets continues, with
new giants emerging
People increasingly use
the mobile internet.
Video is the fastest
growing application.
OTT providers continue
to build a dominant
position in the
telecommunications
landscape
People increasingly
connect with each
other to exchange
information and
influence CSPs
Within today’s transforming telecommunications landscape, four
major trends are apparent
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Consolidation continues – Many CSPs have become international
companies by expanding their business across multiple countries
6
Company (HQ)
Number
of
Countries
Subs
(mio)
2010
Rev
France Telecom (France) 32 217 63,3
Telefonica (Spain) 25 231 88,5
Bharti (India) 21 243 21,2
MTN (South Africa) 21 137 17,0
Vodafone (UK) 20 391 72,9
Singtel (Singapore) 20 382 13,6
Telia Sonera (Sweden) 19 160 16,3
Vimpelcom (NL) 19 159 24,0
America Movil (Mexico) 18 236 51,3
Etisalat (UAE) 18 135 8,5
Deutsche Telekom (Germany) 17 151 85,0
Tele2 (Sweden) 12 30 6,5
Telenor (Norway) 11 203 17,5
STC (KSA) 10 139 14,0
Axiata (Malaysia) 10 160 5,0
Emergence of multi-country Giants
15 multi-country (10 or more countries)
companies now control ± 3 billion subs
As part of the sector’s
transformation, many
telecom operators have
increased their footprints
outside their home markets
Challenges:
How can the multi-country CSP
leverage their scale and identify
the right synergy potential for
their company?
How can the single-country
CSP compete against global
CSPs in their own market?
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
OTT providers thrive – but Value concentrates
7
Top 4 = 70% of total of top 25
Top 25
drivers of
Internet
traffic
Top
150
CSPs = ~1/2
Combined Market Value Combined Market Value
OTT providers – in particular the top 4 – will
continue to build and expand their dominant
position in both mature and emerging markets
Challenges:
How can CSPs compete against OTT
players?
Or better, if they cannot beat them, how can
they partner with OTT providers in a way
they both benefit?
Premium priced devices, customer
eco-system, pay for product (apps,
iTunes, iCloud)
Search and advertising value cap-
ture, customer data monetization
Extensive retail portfolio, retail
portal infrastructure, recommen-
dation engine, advertising value
capture
Dominant market position,
advertising value capture, self-
content creation business design
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Mobile data (really video) explodes
8
597
2379
4215
6896
10804
1252
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Middle East & Africa
Central & Eastern Europe
Latin America
North America
Western Europe
Asia Pacific
59 7
12 52
2 3 79
4 2 15
6 8 9 6
10 8 0 4
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Mobile VoIP
Mobile Gaming
Mobile File Sharing
Mobile M2M
Mobile Web/Data
Mobile Video
Global Mobile Data Traffic, 2011–2016 (TB x 1000/ month)
70.5
%
20%
40%
23%
18%
Mobile data – in particular OTT video – will
dramatically increase
Challenges:
How can CSPs cope with the ever-
increasing amount of data, and how can
they close the mobile data revenue gap?
2011
• Global mobile data grew 2.3-fold
• Mobile video traffic exceeded 50%
• Average smartphone usage trippled
2016
• Mobile data traffic will increase 18-fold
• 2/3 of mobile data traffic will be video
78% CAGR
Source: Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2011–2016..
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Consumers are seizing control
12/29/11 Press Release: “Starting January 15, a new $2 payment
convenience fee will be instituted for
customers who make single bill
payments online or by telephone”
Greetings,
I am disappointed to learn that Verizon Wireless
plans to institute a new $2 fee for paying bills
online…. Your company should not assume that
it can do anything to your customers and
that we will allow it to happen…
Within 24 hours, more than 100,000
people had signed a online petition:
12/30/11 Press Release:
“Verizon Wireless has decided it will not institute the
fee for online or telephone single payments that was announced earlier this week.
The company made the decision in response to
customer feedback about the plan…”
9
77% Tell friends/
family bout
their poor
experience
81% Avoid
Providers
with poor
experience
48%
9%
10%
44%
51%
56%
31%
7%
19%
23%
41%
45%
65%
25%
16%
5%
61%
56%
Attempt to redial/reconnect
Avoid providers with whom
friends had bad experiences
Tell friends about my poor
experience
Contact customer service
Switch providers, -
e.g. use a different SIM
My provider proactively
contact me
What happens when being disconnected?
Always Most/ sometimes Never
Source: 2011 IBM Global Telecom Consumer Survey, Global N= 13237
Consumers now have unprecedented power
to build and demolish brand strength as they
blog, text and comment via social media
Challenges:
How can CSPs get in tune with todays
digital consumers, and respond to negative
chatter?
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
To evaluate the impact of the recession and the empowerment of
consumers the IBV conducted both a Consumer ánd a CMO survey
10
IBM Global Consumer Survey
(25 countries;13,237 consumers)
IBM Global CMO Survey
(131 interviews with telecom CMOs)
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
CSP CMOs indicated they feel underprepared particularly in areas that
are key for connecting to customers, identified as most critical for them
Source: Q7 Which of the following market factors will have the most impact on your marketing organization over the next 3 to 5 years? n1=131 Q8 How prepared
are you to manage the impact of the top 5 market factors that will have the most impact on your marketing organization over the next 3 to 5 years?
Global outsourcing
Decreasing brand loyalty
Customer collaboration and influence
Growth of channel and device choices
Data explosion
Regulatory considerations
ROI accountability
Privacy considerations
Corporate transparency
Shifting consumer demographics
Social media
Financial constraints
Emerging market opportunities
Mean
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1
2
3
4
11
50
60
70
40
20 40 60 0
Global Marketing Priority Matrix
Factors impacting
marketing Percent of CMOs selecting
as ‘Top five factors’
Underpreparedness Percent of CMOs reporting
underpreparedness
8 7
11 12
6
3
7
6
1
2 4
5
10 9
Telecom (CSPs)
11
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
12
The IBM Institute for Business Value conducted a survey of more than
13,000 consumers in 25 countries in both mature and emerging markets
Consumer Spending
priorities for 2011 –
2013
Consumers’ Adoption of
digital comms services
and products
Consumer Sources of
Information for
services/products
Consumer Profiles and
Attitudes towards their
providers
Customer Advocacy
and Antagonism
Revenue Opportunities
with ‘connected
consumers’
Surveys conducted in 25 countries mid 2011
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
13
-8%
-9%
-13%
-15%
-17%
-19%
-26%
-27%
-29%
-33%
-43%
15%Utilities
Food & drinks
Transportation
Mobile broadband usage
Pay television
Mobile phone usage
Landline/wireline usage
Sports
Holidays/vacations
Clothing
Electrical appliances
Going out
Mobile Telephony
Mobile Broadband
Transportation
Pay television
Utilities
Elect. Appliances
Fixed Telephony.
Net Increase/Decrease
Holidays
Food & drinks
Clothing
Going out
Sports
average
-19% 50%
25%
24%
23%
14%
14%
13%
12%
7%
4%
-10%
-19%
Utilities
Mobile Telephony
Food & drinks
Transportation
Clothing
Mobile Broadband
Electrical appliances
Holiday/vacation
Fixed Telephony
Pay television
Sports
Going out
Mobile Telephony
Mobile Broadband
Transportation
Pay Television
Utilities
Elect. Appliances
Fixed Telephony
Net Increase/Decrease
Holidays
Food & drinks
Clothing
Going out
Sports +13%
average
Consumer sentiment on future spending in western European
countries is far less than that in emerging European countries
Source: 2011 IBM Global Telecom Consumer Survey, UK N = 797: Russia N = 514
Question: Compared to previous years, are you likely to spend less, the same or more on the following products / services in the next 2-3 years?
UK Russia
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
44%40%38%31%
25%25%22%20%16%
-4%-5%-7%-8%-8%-9%-9%-12%-17%-18%-19%-22%
-29%-30%
-56%
1%
Sw
ed
en
UK
Gre
ece
Ita
ly
Po
rtu
ga
l
Fra
nce
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Spain
Belg
ium
Ge
rma
ny
Au
str
alia
US
A
Ja
pa
n
Ca
na
da
.
Cyp
rus
Czech R
.
Pola
nd
Ru
ssia
Ind
ia
Ch
ina
Bra
zil
UA
E
Me
xic
o
So
uth
Afr
ica
Kore
a
45%
35%31%
15%15%12%8%6%5%
-3%-6%-6%-7%-7%-9%-10%-12%-13%-15%-16%-20%
-25%-32%
-43%
-2%S
we
de
n
UK
Gre
ece
Ita
ly
Po
rtu
ga
l
Fra
nce
Neth
erlands
Spain
Cze
ch
R.
Belg
ium
Ge
rma
ny
Au
str
alia
US
A
Ja
pa
n
Ca
na
da
.
Cyp
rus
Pola
nd
Ru
ssia
Ind
ia
Ch
ina
Bra
zil
UA
E
Me
xic
o
So
uth
Afr
ica
Kore
a
Emerging
Markets
Spending on MOBILE Telephony (Voice, SMS, etc) (2012 – 2014)
Spending on MOBILE Broadband (2012 – 2014)
More than less consumers in western European countries expect to reduce spending on mobile telephony and broadband
Net
Incre
ase
/Decre
ase
N
et
Incre
ase
/Decre
ase
Source: 2011 IBM Global Telecom Consumer Survey, Global N= 13237; Mature Countries N=8865; Emerging Countries N=4372 14
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
15
Mobile Telephony
Email/IM/Chat
Social Networking
VoIP
Video Streaming
Fixed Voice
84%
85%
60%
49%
34%
56%
Daily
Usage
Mobile Telephony
Email/IM/Chat
Social Networking
VoIP
Video Streaming
Fixed Voice
70%
66%
45%
46%
13%
28%
2
1
4
3
5
6
2
1
5
5
3
6
Em
erg
ing
Countr
ies
Ma
ture
Co
un
trie
s
6 7%
6 4 %6 3 %
6 0 %
51%4 9 %
4 6 %4 6 %4 5%
4 1%4 0 %
3 6 %3 4 %
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Gre
ece
Sw
eden
Russia
Port
ugal
Pola
nd
Italy
UK
Spain
Czech R
.
Germ
any
Fra
nce
Neth
erlands
Belg
ium
Daily access of SOCIAL
NETWORKING sites in
European countries
Source: 2011 IBM Global Telecom Consumer Survey, Global N= 13237; Mature Countries N=8865; Emerging Countries N=4372
Many consumers have switched to – or increased use of – OTT communication services
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Consumers’ Perception of network quality is relatively poor, yet most
consumers do not engage with CSPs on these issues
16
6% 6% 8% 8% 9%11% 12% 13% 14%
17%21%
23% 25%
0%
10%
20%
30%
Cze
ch
Be
lgiu
m
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Po
rtu
ga
l
Sw
ed
en
Gre
ece
Fra
nce
UK
Sp
ain
Ge
rma
ny
Po
lan
d
Ita
ly
Ru
ssia
9%12% 12%
15% 16% 17% 18% 19% 20% 21% 23%25% 25%
0%
10%
20%
30%
Cze
ch
Be
lgiu
m
Po
rtu
ga
l
Sw
ed
en
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
UK
Gre
ece
Fra
nce
Sp
ain
Ge
rma
ny
Po
lan
d
Ru
ssia
Ita
ly
31%33%37%40%41%43% 46%
50%52%53% 56%62%65%
69%67%63%60%59%57% 54%
50%48%47% 44%38%35%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
UK
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Sw
ed
en
Po
lan
d
Ge
rma
ny
Po
rtu
ga
l
Sp
ain
Cze
ch
Be
lgiu
m
Fra
nce
Ru
ssia
Ita
ly
Gre
ece
No
Yes
Frequently DROPPED MOBILE
CALLS as perceived by consumers
Frequently DISCONNECTED MOBILE INTERNET
SESSIONS as perceived by consumers
Question: Do you ever complain to
your service provider when you are
disconnected from the network?
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Spain
Russia
Fra
nce
UK
Italy
Neth
erlan
ds
Sw
eden
Gre
ece
Germ
any
Cze
ch
R.
Port
ugal
Belg
ium
Pola
nd
Telco networks unreliable, variable service expected
Don't believe it make any difference
Too much hassle to get through to the Call Centre
Have to wait too long in queue to speak to Call Centre
My Provider charge for calls to Call Centre
My Provider is unable to resolve my problems
Don’t know how to contact my Provider to complain
Ranking of reasons for not complaining vary by country
Reasons for NOT complaining
Question: Why do you not complain to your service provider when you are disconnected from the network during a conversation, a voice
call or internet session?
17
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
92% Attempt Redial/
Reconnect
77% Tell friends/family
about their poor
experience
81% Avoid Providers
with poor
experience
What happens when being disconnected?
48%
25%
9%
10%
44%
56%
61%
51%
56%
31%
7%
19%
23%
41%
45%
65%
16%
5%
Attempt to redial/reconnect
Avoid providers associated with poor
experiences
Tell friends/family about my poor
experience
Contact customer service
Switch providers – e.g., use different SIM
My provider contacts me when I have a poor
network experience
Source: 2011 IBM Global Telecom Consumer Survey, Global N= 13237
Always Most/sometimes Never
18
While consumers might not be connecting with their providers, they
are definitely connected with other consumers
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
70%
64%
51%
45%
31%
22%
19%
17%
66%
51%
28%
35%
19%
13%
23%
8%
Internet search
Recommendations from friends/family
Social media
Web sites of communication providers
Traditional advertising
Emails/ promotional offers
Retail stores
Shopping portals/ auctions
Emerging markets
Mature markets
What are you preferred sources of information when you are looking
for communication products and services?
Question: What are you preferred sources of information when you are looking for communication products and services?
19
Family/Friends – and Internet Search and Social Media - have
become the preferred sources of information
Source: 2011 IBM Global Telecom Consumer Survey, Global N= 13237; Mature Countries N=8865; Emerging Countries N=4372
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Spain
Russia
Fra
nce
US
A
UK
Ch
ina
India
Austr
alia
Italy
Mexic
o
UA
E
Ko
rea
Japan
Canada
Neth
erlan
ds
Sw
eden
Bra
zil
Gre
ece
Germ
any
Czech R
.
Port
ugal
Belg
ium
Pola
nd
Internet search or comparison sites
Recommendations / advice from friends, family, peers
Social media, blogs, discussion groups, knowledge sharing web sites
Websites of communication providers
Traditional advertising
Retail stores
Emails from comms providers, incl. promotional offers of new products
Shopping portals/ auctions
In a number of countries, Social Media is ranked as the number two source of information in the below 25 age group (South Africa #1)
South
Afr
ica
Source: 2011 IBM Global Telecom Consumer Survey, Global N= 13237; Mature Countries N=8865; Emerging Countries N=4372
Under
25s
20
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
21
CSPs should focus on this new trend and mine digital channels, such
as blogs, tweets, social networks and peer reviews
Blogs
Tweets
Peer
Reviews
Social
Networks
• Get in tune with today’s digital consumers
by listening to the digital dialogue
• Become part of the dialogue and to be
prepared to proactively respond to
negative chatter
• Encourage a two-way dialogue and
embrace customer input by building online
and offline communities
• Find the influencers, and target them with
appropriate messaging
By capturing viewer insights from social media sources, RTL
Nederland was able to gather timely feedback from viewers
on the television programmes 'X Factor' and 'So You Think
You Can Dance'. This helped the entertainment company to
better understand audience needs and preferences and
increase viewer satisfaction and involvement.
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Bharti Airtel understands how important it is to participate in the
digital dialogue and how it can help solving problems
Source:http://www.buzzom.com/2011/07/airtel-adopts-social-media-strongly-customers-can-live-chat-in-facebook-and-orkut/
http://telecomtalk.info/airtel-impact-on-social-media/51645/
Having the official verified Twitter profile @Airtel_Presence,
they are scanning for every tweet which contains the word
“airtel” in it and giving appropriate replies to the customers and
solving the issues.
Airtel uses social network analysis to determine customers
facing problems. Any mention on social media is captured and
they get in touch with the customer to get the issue resolved.
“We take the business of customer satisfaction very
seriously.
Abhilasha
Hans,
CSO
22
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
A consumers’attitude is shaped by cumulative experience and
directs future behavior and suggestions for improvement
Likelihood to Recommend A willingness to recommend one’s
primary provider to friends and family
Purchase Intent
AND A willingness to increase one’s
purchases if one’s primary provider
expanded its assortment and offered
products currently found only at other
providers
Staying Rate
AND
A willingness to stay with one’s primary
provider, even if other providers begin
offering competitive products or services
CFiq: An Advocate is defined by three criteria
Antagonists Apathetics Advocates
Consumer Attitude
CFiq: IBM’s approach for Customer Advocacy: Customer Focused Insight Quotient 23
“CFiq versus NPS,” The Customer Institute,, 2007, http://thecustomerinstitute.blogspot.com/2007/09/cfiq-versus-nps.html
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Applying CFiq on the global consumer sample, it is found that only
18% are advocates, and 60% are antagonistic towards their CSP
“I have recommended my provider to several people” “They have amazing customer service” “They are more expensive but I hardly get disconnected or have calls dropped”
“I think my telco over-charges me but how can I prove it; my credit runs out too quickly after I top-up” “The promotions lack any relevance to me” “ I am looking to switch to the new provider offering cheaper rates”
60% Antagonists
18% Advocates
22% Apathetics
Higher Shareholder
Value
Lower Shareholder
Value
Advocates have a higher
wallet share and are highly
complimentary of the
provider capability
Apathetics are generally
passive participants
susceptible to competitor
offerings
Antagonists have low
wallet share and high
support costs and are
prone to bad-mouth the
provider
24
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
The low advocacy level contrasts with, for instance, the retail industry,
where it is close to twice that of the telecommunications industry
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
% Advocates
% A
nta
go
nis
ts
Sweden
Russia
Spain
Greece
France
United Kingdom
Czech Republic
Portugal
Poland Italy
Germany
Belgium
Netherlands
Global average 18%
Global average 60%
25
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Competitive advantage takes a distinctive customer experience that
goes beyond satisfaction and creates real value for the customer
Customer Satisfaction
(CSATs)
Customer Experience
beyond Satisfaction
Apple customers have become passionate champions for
the brand because of the unique experience Apple
provides.
Research has revealed that Apple advocates generate
revenues about 45 percent higher than their competitors’
best customers.
26
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Listens and proactively follows-up on issues 25% 68%
Prompt correction of errors when they occur 29% 73%
Displays consistent level of knowledge 29% 70%
Resolves problems fairly 24% 66%
Values me as a customer 26% 71%
Listens and collects information necessary to meet
communication needs 25% 68%
Allows me to customize products and services 29% 70%
Offers me relevant products and services 29% 74%
Provide advice to improve my user experience 24% 63%
Allows multiple ways to interact with them 44% 81%
Does not request for existing information repeatedly 42% 72%
Seeks input to develop new communication
Products/services 19% 48%
Advocates % strongly agree % strongly agree Antagonists
Give the CSP
credit for
doing
“everything”
right
Find
fault
with
“everything
” CSP
does
Source: 2011 IBM Global Telecom Consumer Survey, Global N= 13237
Gap
CSPs do not account for the extreme gap in emotive attributes of their customer base
27
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Advocacy is built on Trust
My Telecom providers’ bill is accurate
66%
25%
26%
39%
8%
36%
Advocates
Antagonists
Always Most of the time
Sometimes/ Never
Q09c Please provide an indication of your
experience of the frequency with
bills/charges are accurate
34%
10%
53%
64%
13%
26%
Advocates
Antagonists
Most trusted Somewhat trusted
Least trusted
Q26 Who do you trust to manage your identity
and private/personal information, including
medical data, transactions and social
relationships and retain your privacy?
Trust in CSPs to manage identity and
private/personal information
Invoice
Source: 2011 IBM Global Telecom Consumer Survey, Global N= 13237 28
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
CSPs should focus on building new non-traditional capabilities, as
well as deeper understanding of customer preferences and attitudes
A. Improve customer experience insight by focusing
on attributes that drive customer
advocacy
B. Apply a social behavior-driven “outside-in”
perspective and become part of a two-way
dialogue with the consumer
C. Profile and target customer advocacy
segments to improve advocacy levels
D. Build multilevel capabilities to
support the new approach to customer advocacy.
We suggest four key recommendations to
help CSPs become more customer focused:
Ch
an
nels
&
To
uc
hp
oin
ts P
rod
uc
ts a
nd
Serv
ices
Emotive
Performance
Rational
Performance
Wants
and
needs
29
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Are you prepared to augment advocacy?
30
• Does your organization know who your advocates are and what attributes define
them?
• Does your organization know who your antagonists are and what they might be
saying about you?
• How valuable are your advocates? What might drive more business from them?
• Which elements of the customer experience are most important to your customers?
How do you measure those?
• Does your organization address both the rational and emotive drivers of behavior?
• How are you leveraging customer and network analytics to improve the customer
experience?
• Do you have the right information on your core customers? Do you have a single
view of the customer across all channels?
• Do you exploit social network analysis to understand how your customers perceive
your products and services?
• How well do customer experience measures correlate to hard outcome measures
such as churn, ARPU and customer profitability?
• Does your current analytical capability support this challenge to improve advocacy?
10 Questions to consider
30
© 2012 IBM Corporation
IBM Institute for Business Value
Thank you
IBV
Rob van den Dam
Global Telecom Industry Lead
IBM Institute for Business Value
www.ibm.com/iibv
Europe
Mario Cavestany
IBM Vice President Europe
Telecommunications & Media Industries
Global
Bob Fox
Global Telecom Industry Leader
IBM Global Business Services