12
1 WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis P4 Eurofins Analytik GmbH (Germany) - Scarlett Biselli P6 Institute for Cereal Research Bergamo (Italy) - Rita Redaelli P8 Experimental Institute for Cereal Research of Fiorenzuola d´Arda (Italy) - Valeria Terzi P15 Agrotest Fyto, Ltd. (CR) - Ivana Polisenska AVEQ -1st project meeting Clermont Ferrand, 19.-21.9. 2007

WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

  • Upload
    sanjiv

  • View
    54

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis. AVEQ -1st project meeting Clermont Ferrand, 19.-21.9. 2007. P4 Eurofins Analytik GmbH (Germany) - Scarlett Biselli P6Institute for Cereal Research Bergamo (Italy)- Rita Redaelli - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

1

WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

P4 Eurofins Analytik GmbH (Germany) - Scarlett Biselli

P6 Institute for Cereal Research Bergamo (Italy)- Rita Redaelli

P8 Experimental Institute for Cereal Research of Fiorenzuola d´Arda (Italy) - Valeria Terzi

P15 Agrotest Fyto, Ltd. (CR) - Ivana Polisenska

AV

EQ

-1s

t pro

ject

mee

ting

Cle

rmon

t Fer

rand

, 19.

-21.

9.

2007

Page 2: WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

2

WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

- what can we offer?

AV

EQ

-1s

t pro

ject

mee

ting

Cle

rmon

t Fer

rand

, 19.

-21.

9.

2007

P4 (Scarlett) - mycotoxin analyses LC-MS/MS (multitoxin method, DON, T-2, HT-2, zearalenone, diacetoxyscirpenol, 3- and 15- acetyldeoxynivalenol) - 200 samples

P6, P8, P15 (Rita, Valeria, Ivana) - ELISA mycotoxin analyses, DON, T-2, ZEA - 2200 analyses

P8 (Valeria) - Identification of Fusarium species - 200

Page 3: WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

3

WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

- tasks and questions

1) Which toxins are we to analyse?

2) Which Fusarium species are we to look for?

3) How to manage huge amount of samples?

4) Analyses; Methods

AV

EQ

-1s

t pro

ject

mee

ting

Cle

rmon

t Fer

rand

, 19.

-21.

9.

2007

Page 4: WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

4

1) Which toxins are we to analyse?

AVEQ = Avena genetic resources for quality in human consumption

EU legislation setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs: Commission Regulation (EC) 1881/2006

DON (deoxynivalenol), ZEA, T-2 + HT-2

New discussed EU limits for T-2 and HT-2(to be fixed in 200?)

AV

EQ

-1s

t pro

ject

mee

ting

Cle

rmon

t Fer

rand

, 19.

-21.

9.

2007

Page 5: WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

5

1) Which toxins are we to analyse?

DON; ZEA; T-2 + HT-2

cereals unprocessed 1250; 100; 100 ppb

oats unprocessed 1750; 100; 500 ppb

cereals intended for 750; 75; 200* ppbdirect human consumption, cereal flour…*oat products

AV

EQ

-1s

t pro

ject

mee

ting

Cle

rmon

t Fer

rand

, 19.

-21.

9.

2007

The maximum level applies to unprocessed cereals placed on the market for first-stage processing. “First-stage processing” shall mean any physical or thermal treatment other than drying.

Page 6: WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

6

2) Which Fusarium species?A

VE

Q -

1st p

roje

ct m

eeti

ng C

lerm

ont F

erra

nd, 1

9.-2

1.9.

20

07

What should be the purpose ...

A) to analyse naturally infected oats to determine Fusarium species and their mutual proportions (variability in years, locations)

B) to analyse inoculated oats- to confirm that (only) the Fusarium species which was used for inoculation is present ?- quantification of the amount of Fusarium mycelium for studying relationships between mycotoxins content ?

Page 7: WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

7

2) Which Fusarium species?A

VE

Q -

1st p

roje

ct m

eeti

ng C

lerm

ont F

erra

nd, 1

9.-2

1.9.

20

07

A) to analyse naturally infected oats- which species?

Tekauz and Mueller (2006) - in Canada F. graminearum, F. poae, F. sporotrichoides and F. avenaceum

Parrika et al. (2006) - in Finland F. langsethiae, F. poae, F. culmorum, F. graminearum, F. avenaceum

Imathiu et al. (2006) - in GB F. langsethiae

CR - 2006, 9 oat samples, 16 Fusarium isolates

7x F. sporotrichoides

6x F. poae

2x F. culmorum

?F. langsethiae?

Page 8: WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

8

2) Which Fusarium species?A

VE

Q -

1st p

roje

ct m

eeti

ng C

lerm

ont F

erra

nd, 1

9.-2

1.9.

20

07

F. langsethiae

- newly described Fusarium species- similar to F. poae and F. sporotrichoides- produces T-2 and HT-2 toxins- isolated from all types of cereals, more common in oats- found in Sweden, Norway, Russia, Austria, Finland- hard artificial infection at flowering

Page 9: WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

9

3) Sample selection for analyses

Inoculated plots:300 accessions + 10 controls each year x 4 locations (Germany, Italy, Romania, CR)______________1240 samples

AV

EQ

-1s

t pro

ject

mee

ting

Cle

rmon

t Fer

rand

, 19.

-21.

9.

2007

In case of 2 (DON, T-2):

550 samples ELISA + 100 HPLC/per year

ELISA potential: 1100 analyses/per year (?number of mycotoxins analysed?)

LC-MS/MS potential: 100 analyses/each year

Page 10: WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

10

3) Sample selection for analyses

LC-MS/MS :- detection limit of 10 ppb- HT-2 toxin- more toxins in one analysis - expensive

AV

EQ

-1s

t pro

ject

mee

ting

Cle

rmon

t Fer

rand

, 19.

-21.

9.

2007

Discussion about LC-MS/MS role

- verification of ELISA results, interesting samples (low visible infection, low ELISA levels…)

- analyses of other mycotoxins

- comparative study - relationship between T-2 and HT-2 (naturally infected, inoculated)

ELISA :- detection limit of 5-50 ppb- HT-2 toxin- one toxin in one analysis- reasonable costs

Page 11: WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

11

4) Analyses, methods A

VE

Q -

1st p

roje

ct m

eeti

ng C

lerm

ont F

erra

nd, 1

9.-2

1.9.

20

07

- harmonisation of the labs (1-2 reference samples, interlaboratory comparison)

- the same kits for analyses ?

- sample amount per analysis ?

- logistic of sample distribution ?

Page 12: WP 5 – Fusarium and mycotoxin analysis

12

Year 2007

CalendarMonth

03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

Monthof theproject

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Year 2008

CalendarMonth

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

Monthof theproject

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Year 2009

CalendarMonth

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

Monthof theproject

23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

Year 2010

CalendarMonth

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

Monthof theproject

35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46

WP 5 - Time table