Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Document of
The World Bank
Report No: 72067-IN
RESTRUCTURING PAPER
ON A
PROPOSED PROJECT RESTRUCTURING
OF
SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT
LOAN
December 10, 2009
TO THE
REPUBLIC OF INDIA
{DATE OF RESTRUCTURING}
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
2
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
Regional Vice President: Isabel Guerrero
Country Director: Onno Ruhl
Sector Manager / Director: Karla Gonzalez Carvajal
Task Team Leader: Nupur Gupta
3
INDIA SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT
P110371
CONTENTS
Page
A. SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 4
B. PROJECT STATUS .............................................................................................................. 4
C. PROPOSED CHANGES ...................................................................................................... 4
D. APPRAISAL SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 5
ANNEX 1: RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING ................................................. 6
4
SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT
RESTRUCTURING PAPER
A. SUMMARY The proposed change involves (i) the cancellation of the Pune City Demonstration Project under
Component 2 of the Project and reallocation of the GEF+IBRD funds from Pune, Government of
Maharashtra to Hubli-Dharwad, Government of Karnataka, a new city being inducted into India
Sustainable Urban Transport Project, (ii) the cancellation of other works and goods associated
with implementation of the bus rapid transit system in Pimpri-Chinchwad, Government of
Maharashtra (under sub-component (3b) and Goods under subcomponent (3) of Part 2B of the
Project) and reallocation to Hubli-Dharwad, Government of Karnataka (iii) an increase in the
financing percentage for consultants services and training under Part I of the Project on Capacity
Development Assistance for Urban Transport (Component IB) in the GEF Grant Agreement
from 91% to 100% for reasons of processing ease, and (iv) an extension in the Closing Date of
the Project to November 30, 2015.
B. PROJECT STATUS
The overall project progress is presently rated Moderately Unsatisfactory. The first component on
capacity building component, is somewhat behind schedule, and procurement of various activities
is underway.
In regard to Component 2 on the City Demonstration Projects, among the Phase 1 cities Mysore
has recently completed implementation of the ITS Project and Pimpri-Chinchwad has concluded
procurement of major works and implementation is in progress. However, there are delays in land
acquisition and disbursement of R&R assistance including safeguard non compliances resulting
in an overall Safeguards rating of Unsatisfactory for the Project. In Indore, the third Phase 1 city,
the procurement of the ITS Project has been initiated through own funds following delays in
processing the Government of India funding expected from the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban
Renewal Mission. Among Phase 2 cities, the progress has been slow in Naya Raipur and it is in
the process of preparing bid documents for procuring works related to public transport
component.
The participation of Pune, the second city under Phase 2, is now proposed to be cancelled from
SUTP owing to continuing lack of performance by the city on the agreed project components
since initiation. The Pune city demonstration project comprised pedestrian and bicycle
infrastructure improvements on side streets of major mass transit corridors and public transport
improvement. The city government cited a shift in priorities and greater need for undertaking
alternate infrastructure improvements in the city. However, despite rounds of discussions since
the city and the Bank were unable to arrive at a mutually acceptable subset of projects that could
be considered under SUTP, the Steering Committee for SUTP, chaired by the Secretary, Ministry
of Urban Development, Government of India, took the decision in March 2011 to cancel the loan
and grant funds under the SUTP and GEF-SUTP. At the same time, a decision was also taken to
include the city of Hubli-Dharwad in Karnatakafor building a Bus Rapid Transit System to
improve urban mobility under the Project and reallocate the cancelled funds from Pune to them.
5
Pimpri-Chinchwad owing to improvement in its financial situation has surplus funds available
and therefore seeks a cancellation of IBRD funds proposed for (i) associated infrastructure
improvements such as for passenger access to the BRT stations and terminals and (ii) global
positioning systems and passenger information systems for controlling BRT operations. These
activities are proposed to be funded through internal resources.
The disbursements of the project are presently at 15 percent of both GEF and IBRD funds. One of
the main reasons for this is the non-performance of Pune which accounted for roughly 45 percent
of the IBRD funds.
C. PROPOSED CHANGES
Results/indicators
While the PDO and the PDO outcome remains unaffected the outcome and intermediate
outcome indicator for Pune will need to be deleted and substituted with the new ones relevant
for Hubli-Dharwad. Please see Annex 1.
Components
Within Component 2 on City Demonstration Projects, Pune (in Maharashtra) will be replaced
by Hubli-Dharwad (in Karnataka).
In the proposed project in Hubli-Dharwad, Government of Karnataka plans to improve bus
services in the Hubli and Dharwad twin cities through implementation of a 22.3 km BRT line,
consisting of the 11.8 km long corridor between Hubli and Dharwad and extensions into the
central districts of the two cities. The highway along this corridor is being widened as part of
an earlier sanctioned project to meet the growing traffic demand, and the BRT Project shall
benefit from this and proposes additional widening in the 11.8 km section between the cities.
The Comprehensive Traffic and Transportation Plan 2010 for the city estimates the modal
share for public transport at 30 percent. Given the geography of Hubli and Dharwad and the
importance of their economic, health care, educational and social role in the surrounding
region, it is clear that better public transport connections tying the two twin cities together are
in order. The volume of public transport passengers between the two parts of the city is
already enormous and a high capacity mass transit system could cater to the demand more
effectively.
The bus service in the city is operated by North West Karnataka Road Transport Corporation
(NWKRTC) and it is proposed to hire them to operate the BRT service.
The main components of the city demonstration project under SUTP include:
Implementation of a BRT corridor between Hubli and Dharwad including road
works, structures, BRT stations, interchanges, terminals and depots for BRT and
feeder services, foot overbridges, pedestrian and cycling improvements, intelligent
transport system applications, articulated buses etc.
Technical assistance and capacity development activities.
No Particulars Cost Rs.
crores
GOK World
Bank
GEF Financing
%
1 Trunk corridor : (Hosur cross to Hubli CBT &
Jubilee circle to Dharwad CBT) 18.45
18.45
100%
6
2 VUP 13.00 13.00
0%
3 Foot over bridges 24.50
24.50
100%
4 Bus stations 23.45
23.45
100%
5 Terminals & Depots (BRT) 31.42
31.42
100%
6 Interchanges 8.80
8.80
100%
7 BRTS Corridor (Hosur Cross to Jubilee circle) 72.00 72.00
0%
8 Lighting of corridor 8.00 8.00
0%
9 ITS Applications (CBT to CBT) 30.05
30.05
100%
10 ATCS 7.00
7.00
100%
11 Terminals and Depots (Feeder services) 62.28
62.28
100%
12 NMT facilities 9.00
9.00
100%
13 Rolling stock - Standard Buses 39.10 39.10
0%
Rolling stock - Articulated Buses 46.00
46
100%
14 Technical assistance 9.98
15 Total Base Cost 393.05 132.1 260.95 0
16 Total with 15% contingencies 452.01 160.91 291.10
17 Land acquisition & Rehabiliation cost 240.00 240.00
18
Total with Land Acquisition & Rehabilitation
cost 692.01 400.91 291.10 9.98
19 Total in USD, Million 131.81 76.36 55.45 1.90
Institutional arrangements
Institutional Arrangements remain unchanged except the city level Project Implementing
Agency (PIA) for Hubli-Dharwad (State of Karnataka) shall be inducted into the Project and
Pune Municipal Corporation (State of Maharashtra) shall cease to be a PIA. The city level
PIA for implementing the Hubli-Dharwad project is a new Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) by
the name of Hubli Dharwad BRT Company Limited constituted to build and manage the
project. The SPV has been duly registered under the Company’s Act 1956, and the process of
hiring staff is ongoing.
Karnataka Road Development Corporation Limited (KRDCL), responsible for implementing
the highway widening, shall be responsible for the land acquisition along the corridor, both
for the highway widening as well as additional widening on account of the BRT Project. It is
proposed to entrust the further widening to them through the same contractor, and as such
will also be responsible for the implementation of the Environment Management Plan (EMP)
for the corridor. A Memorandum of Understanding will be entered into between KRDCL,
SPV and DULT to ensure that land acquisition and environment impacts are mitigated
consistent with the RAP and Bank’s OP on Involuntary Resettlement and the EMP.
The SPV shall be staffed with necessary technical, procurement, financial management,
social and environment staff. The candidates for the positions have been identified and are
likely to be on board by December 31, 2012. The Board of Directors of the SPV have
authorized the Chairman (Commissioner, Directorate of Urban Land Transport (DULT)) to
proceed with procurement, recruitment of staff, consultants and other professionals to make
the SPV functional to undertake project activities. During the intervening period till the SPV
7
is staffed and functional, SPV proposes to use existing staff at DULT and will ensure smooth
transition.
Financing
o Project Costs
Project Costs (US$m.)
Components/Activities Current1
Proposed
Component 1 7.8
7.1
Component 2
Group A Cities
Pimpri-Chinchwad
Pune
Hubli-Dharwad
Naya Raipur
Group B Cities
Mysore
Indore
Jalandhar
Unallocated
336.8
147.2
78.0
0.00
37.3
4.8
10
59.5
334.8
147.2
0.00
133.6
37.3
4.8
10
0
1.9
Component 3
PMU Project Mgmt Cost
2.0 2.7
World Bank Front End Fee 0.3 0.3
GEF Agency Fee 1.88 1.88
TOTAL 348.7 347.4
o Financing Plan
The financing plan deletes the shares to be financed by different agencies in respect
of Pune and Jalandhar and adds shares for Hubli-Dharwad as follows:
Govt of Karnataka $76.36 million
World Bank loan $55.45 million
GEF $ 1.9 million
Accordingly, the revised financing plan is as follows:
Financing Plan (US$m.)
Source Current
Proposed
Borrower/Recipient 223.1 221.9
International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development (IBRD)
105.2 105.2
Global Environment Facility (GEF) 20.3 20.3
TOTAL 348.7 347.4
1 If the project has had a previous restructuring, the current should reflect the latest approved costs.
8
Reallocations
There has been a reallocation of proceeds from Pune to the Hubli-Dharwad project.
Accordingly, the proceeds under the Pune project stand cancelled.
A. IBRD
Category of Expenditure Allocation % of Financing
Current Revised Current Revised Current Revise
(1) Chhattisgarh
(a) Works under
Part2A of the
Project
12,270,000
12,270,000
100
(b) Goods under
Part2A of
the Project
1,667,000 1,667,000 100
(2) Maharashtra
(a) Works under
sub-
component
(1) of Part 2B
of the Project
20,063,000 0 100
(b) Works under
sub-
component
(2) of Part 2B
of the Project
15,458,000 0 48
(c) Goods under
sub-
component
(1) and (2) of
Part 2B of the
Project
2,084,000 0 22
(d) Works under
sub-
component
(1) of Part 2B
of the Project
Works
under sub-
componen
t 3(a) of
Part 2B of
the Project
29,877,000
29,877,00
72
(e) Works under
sub-
component
(2) of Part 2B
of the Project
Works
under sub-
componen
t (3b) of
Part 2B of
the Project
6,667,000
0
100
(f) Goods under
sub-
component
(1) and (2) of
Part 2B of the
Project
Goods
under sub-
componen
t 3 of Part
2B of the
Project
1,458,000
0
78
9
(g) Unallocated 15,422,925 5,699,925
(3) Goods
and
Works
under Part
2C of the
Project
55,453,000 100
(4) Front end Fee 263,075 263,075
(5) Premia for
Interest Rate
Caps and Interest
Rate Collars
0 0
Total Amount 105,230,000
B. GEF Grant
Category Current Proposed
Amount of
Grant
Allocated $
Percentage of
Expenditure to
be financed
Amount of
Grant
Allocated $
Percentage of
Expenditure to
be financed
(1) Consultant Services & Training
for Part I of the Project
7,050,000 91% 7,050,000 100%
(2) Consultant Services & Training
for Part II of the Project
(a) Chhattisgarh & Maharashtra
(b) Karnataka - Mysore
(c) Madhya Pradesh – Indore
(d) Unallocated
5,700,000
460,000
1,090,000
1,900,000
50%
73%
87%
3,800,000
460,000
1,090,000
1,900,000
50%
73%
87%
(3) Goods (ITS-related)
(a) Madhya Pradesh
(b) Karnataka - Mysore
820,000
1,430,000
64%
100%
820,000
1,430,000
64%
100%
(4) GEF Agency Fee 1,880,000 1,880,000
(5) Consultants’ services and training
for Karnataka – Hubli-Dharwad
under Part 2 of the Project
0
1,900,000
100%
TOTAL AMOUNT 20,330,000 20,330,000
Disbursement
Ministry of Urban Development has requested a change in the disbursement ratio from 91%
to 100% for Part I of the Project for reasons of procedural ease. They propose to maintain
their overall quantum of counterpart funds by contributing their share for this activity towards
Component 3 on Project Management.
Financial Management
An FM assessment has been carried out for the newly created SPV which will be carrying out
the project related activities for BRT in Hubli Dharwad. The assessment was made on the
basis of available documents (Articles of association (AOA) and Memorandum of
10
Association (MOA)) and the discussions held with the Chairman of the SPV. Based on the
detailed assessment, it is concluded that the proposed financial management arrangements
(which are in process of getting established) are adequate to meet the banks fiduciary
requirements. A detailed action plan has also been agreed with the project. The detailed
assessment is available in the back up files. To summarize the key FM contours:
a) Accounting: TALLY software is proposed to be implemented for maintenance of
accounts for the entity.
b) Staffing: The Government Order (GO) dated January 20 2012 mandates the hiring of FM
personnel. The SPV is in the process of hiring, which is expected to be completed by
December 31 2012.
c) Internal Audit: The terms of reference of the existing internal auditors for the project
will be extended to cover the audit for SPV.
d) External Audit: An entrustment of audit from project to CAG through DEA needs to be
concluded within 3 months of restructuring.
e) Budgeting: A portion of funding for Hubli Dharwad BRT project is proposed to be met
from the state urban transport fund. A head of account 4217-60-800-06-01-059 is
assigned for the said purpose. The company is also in discussion with the state
government for assigning a dedicated budget head for routing the government monies for
this project. The budget head needs to be created within 3 months of restructuring.
f) Fund flow and reporting: Bank funds will flow through the office of CAAA to GoI
which will pass on the funds to Government of Karnataka (GoK) as ACA releases. The
state share and ACA releases of project funds will be budgeted under the state urban
transport fund (and thereafter through the dedicated budget head once allotted to SPV).
An initial advance of USD 3 million may be provided to SPV upon receipt of specific
request from them. All other funds will be routed on the basis of expenditures reported by
SPV in the half yearly interim unaudited financial reports (IUFR) submitted to Bank.
These expenditures reported will be subject to the audit certification towards the end of
the year. Based on the request of PIU, retroactive expenditure of USD 1 million in IBRD
funds and USD 200,000 in GEF grant funds is also provided to project.
Procurement
The SPV will work under the control of Board of Directors who will be accountable for
procurement decisions. Delegation to other staff below the Board level for day to day
decisions on procurement and related administrative issues are being worked out. Otherwise
as on the date of the assessment, the board has authorized the Chairman (Commissioner,
DULT) to proceed with procurement, recruitment of staff, consultants and other professionals
to make the SPV functional to undertake project activities. During the intervening period till
the SPV is staffed and functional, SPV proposes to use existing staff at DULT and will ensure
smooth transition. Recruitment of staff, consultants and other professional are already
initiated and will be completed soon. It would be more relevant to reassess the capacity later
when the SPV is staffed and functional to suggest improvement if any. The proposed
procurement implementation structure should be adequate and should be supported with
auxiliary staff with adequate infrastructure. Further, they will require authorization to use e-
procurement portal by GoK.
Procurement at SPV will follow agreed procedure with the Bank and will use SBD for goods,
works and consultancy. Procurement of goods and works will be through e-Portal of GoK.
Project is preparing the bidding documents for works to be procured under the project. Since
the Guidelines of May 2010 will apply to the SUTP including the procurement under the
Hubli-Dharwad BRTS project, the consultancy procurement will use the paper mode of issue
11
of RFP and receipt of proposals. The PMC supporting the project at MOUD is fully
conversant with the consultancy procurement and will assist SPV to develop documents.
Bank's clearance of e-Procurement is subject to the implementation of the few measures
aimed at increasing awareness, increasing bidder’s participation, and promoting system
security which have been brought to the notice of the SPV.
Closing date
The closing date of the project is proposed to be extended to November 30, 2015, from its
current closing date of November 30, 2014. The proposed extension is necessary to
accommodate the new project, namely a Bus Rapid Transit System connecting the twin cities
of Hubli and Dharwad, being inducted into SUTP. This was necessitated due to very slow
progress with the project in Pune and hence the decision to drop that component and replace
it with the Hubli-Dharwad BRT. Since this has entered the project two years after the project
start date, and is expected to take three years to implement it will spill beyond the current
project completion date. With effective monitoring it will be possible to complete the project
with a one year extension, even though the new project entered two years after the project
start.
Implementation Schedule
The Hubli-Dharwad BRT project has started implementation during 2012-2013 and is
expected to be completed in 2014-15.
D. APPRAISAL SUMMARY
Economic and financial analysis
The Hubli-Dharwad project has an Economic IRR of 29.5% and an NPV of US$ 448 million,
indicating high economic returns with desirable distributional benefits of the proposed
project.
Technical
Government of Karnataka plans to improve bus services in the Hubli and Dharwad twin cities
through implementation of a 22.3 km BRT line, consisting of the 11.8 km long corridor
between Hubli and Dharwad and extensions into the central districts of the two cities.
The main components of the city demonstration project under SUTP include:
Implementation of a BRT corridor between Hubli and Dharwad including road
works, structures, BRT stations, interchanges, terminals & depots for BRT and feeder
services, foot overbridges, pedestrian and cycling improvements, intelligent transport
system applications, articulated buses etc.
Technical assistance and capacity building activities
Social
The construction of BRT in Hubli-Dharwad will be integrated with the ongoing road
widening between these two cities and the entire land acquisition and resettlement impacts
will be triggered for road widening to 35 meters in the city limits and 44 meters outside city
limits. This road widening will involve substantial land acquisition and resettlement impacts
consisting of 73 acres of land including 59 acres of private land and impacts to 886 structures
including 237 major impacts consisting of loss of shelter or livelihood. Out of these 237
major impacts, 101 (43%) are title holders, 87 are tenants (37%) and the remaining 49 are
non-title holders (20%) losing either houses or petty shops. In addition, 8 community assets
and 15 religious structures including some on the Government lands will be affected. Land
12
acquisition will be implemented by Karnataka Road Development Corporation Limited
(KRDCL) as part of ongoing road widening and a Memorandum of Understanding will be
entered into between KRDCL and SPV to ensure that land acquisition impacts are mitigated
consistent with the RAP and Bank’s OP on Involuntary Resettlement. The resettlement
impacts will be implemented by SPV with assistance of an NGO/ consultant services. The
draft RAP, including the entitlements matrix, has been cleared by the Bank and disclosed
both by DULT and Bank. The results of the follow-up consultations with the various impact
groups will be incorporated in the final RAP. The entire cost of land acquisition and
resettlement will be met out of counterpart funding except the consultancy services.
Environment
Hubli-Dharwad has prepared a draft EIA and EMP for the project which have been cleared by
the Bank with some comments which will be addressed in the final version. A two part EMP
has been drafted, Part 1 covering impacts due to road works, and Part 2 covering the other
facilities proposed – BRT and feeder service terminals, stations, depots, last mile
connectivity. Key impacts already identified for mitigation, in addition to pollution from
construction activities, include reduction in water storage in roadside pond, cutting of about
1750 trees, increased noise and air pollution for 8 sensitive receptors such as academic
institutions and hospitals close to the corridor, management of safety during construction for
workers and road users and pollution from BRT facilities during the operation stage. KRDCL
is involved in the contracting and supervision of ongoing road widening and shall also be
responsible for implementation of EMP Part 1.
ANNEX 1:
Results Framework and Monitoring
INDIA: SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT
Project Development Objective (PDO):
The Project’s Development Objective (PDO) is to promote environmentally sustainable urban transport in India and to improve the usage of environment-friendly transport modes through
demonstration projects in selected cities.
Revised Project Development Objective:
Not Applicable
PDO Level Results
Indicators* Co
re
D=Dropped
C=Continue
N= New
R=Revised
Unit of
Measure Baseline
Cumulative Target Values**
Frequency Data Source/
Methodology
Responsibility
for Data
Collection YR 1
YR 2
YR 3
YR4 YR5
Indicator One:
At least in six cities : an urban
transport planning process, in
line with international good
practices, is established and
operated
Continue 0 Action
Plans
developed
in four
cities
New
Investment
program /
projects
prepared
through the
new
planning
process in
six cities
Annual
Reports
Monitoring of
progress with
NUTP
implementation
in NURM
PMU
Indicator Two:
Forecast trasnport CO2
emissions over 10 years in the
cities participating in
Component 2 are at least
128,000 tons lower that their
‘business as usual’ forecast
Continue 0 GHG M&E
methodolog
y to be
finalised
Baseline
to be
develope
d based
on GHG
M&E
methodol
ogy
Expected co-
benefits
achieved
Ex-post
evaluation
Traffic Surveys PIU
Indicator Three:
Pimpri: Modal share by public
transport increases
Continue Percent 4.2% 8% Ex-post
evaluation
Household
Survey – on
sample basis
PIU
14
Indicator Four:
Hubli-Dharwad: Modal share
by public transport increases.
New 30%
Indicator Five:
Naya Raipur: Public
Transport trip mode share
between Raipur and Naya
Raipur increases
Continue Percent 0% 50% Ex-post
evaluation
Household
Survey – on
sample basis
PIU
Pune: Residents perceive that
walking and cycling have
become safer and more
comfortable in project area
Dropped To be
available
in
January
2010
Follow-up
access /
egress
survey
administered
Before and
after survey
User
Satisfaction
surveys
PIU
INTERMEDIATE RESULTS
Intermediate Result (Component One):
Revised Intermediate Result (Component One):
Intermediate Result indicator
One:
More states and cities develop
strategies for implementing the
urban transport reforms
Continue 0 1 2 3 At least
four cities
complete and endorse
strategies
on any one reform
4 5 At least two
strategies
implemented
Annual
activity
reporting
PMU activity
report
PMU
Intermediate Result indicator
Two:
MOUD partners with states /
cities to identify local issues
and develop sustainable local
solutions
Continue 0 Ten studies
completed and
disseminate
d
20 studies
completed and disseminated
Annual
activity reporting
PMU activity
report
PMU
:
Intermediate Result (Component Two):
Revised Intermediate Result (Component Two):
15
Intermediate Result indicator
One:
Pimpri: 2 BRT corridors in
operation and carrying at least
75 percent of projected
ridership
Continue 0 75% of
projected ridership
Ex-post
evaluation
Passenger
Boarding Account
PIU
Intermediate Result indicator
Two: Naya Raipur – At least
two Public Transport corridors
are established and in operation
between Naya Raipur and
Raipur
Continue 0 1 2 Before and after reports
Site inspection and technical
audit
PIU
Intermediate Result indicator
Three: Naya Raipur – Safe
sidewalks and cycle tracks are
provided on the main roads of
Naya Raipur
Continue Km 0 10 36 Before and
after reports
Site inspection
and technical
audit
PIU
Intermediate Result indicator
Four: Hubli Dharwad – One
BRT corridor in operation and
carrying 75% of projected
ridership.
New
Intermediate Result indicator
Five: Hubli Dharwad – Safe
pedestrian access to BRT
New
Intermediate Result indicator
Six: Pune: Proportion of BRT
riders accessing the BRT
through bicycles or on foot
increases by 2%
Dropped To be
available in January
2010
Follow-up
access/egress survey
administered
Before and
after reports
Intercept surveys PIU
Intermediate Result indicator
Seven: Pune: Bicycle and
pedestrian friendly accesses
constructed for atleast 7
stations of the pilot BRT
corridors
Dropped 0 1 2 Before and
after reports
Site inspection
and technical
audit
PIU
*Please indicate whether the indicator is a Core Sector Indicator (see further http://coreindicators)
**Target values should be entered for the years data will be available, not necessarily annually.
