WORKSHOP:MEPA SIMULATION

The 10-20-70 or the Principle of Learning Continuum upholds

‘Learning by doing principle.’

• At the end of the WORKSHOP, the participants are expected to:

a. Make a Completed Staff Work (CSW) for the 1st Quarterly SMEPA using both the qualitative and quantitative tools (School Heads);

b. Prepare a presentation based on the given dashboard;

c. Simulate the conduct of SMEPA by observing the essential processes, Term of Reference (TOR) of the persons involved, and facilitation and synthesizing skills; and

d. Develop deeper understanding on the importance of SMEPA in enhancing efficiency and effectiveness of governance of basic education delivery.

WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES

WORKSHOP TASK: BY GROUP

TASK TO DO

1. Make a Completed Staff Work (CSW) for the Quarterly SMEPA using both the qualitative and quantitative tools.

2. Prepare a presentation based on the given dashboard.

3. Simulate the conduct of SMEPA by observing the essential processes, Term of Reference (TOR) of the persons involved, and facilitation and synthesizing skills.

TASK TO DO

I. Information Requirements on KPIs for Quality

A. Dashboard• Presents a three year data on achievement

(2011-2014) broken-down per level & subject (Grade 3 & Grade 6 /Year IV).

• Shows comparative graphs and tables to provide MPS by subject: Aral. Pan. Filipino, English, Math and Science.

• Performance of school will be presented using the achievement quartile ratio (how many students belong to the following Quartile: 0-25; 26-50; 51-75; 76-100).

TASK TO DO

I. Information Requirements on KPIs for Quality

B. Segmentation• Make Data map showing the performance and mean

percent score (MPS) (ex. by Gender & Tribe)

C. Analyses• Describes the programs and/or practices implemented

leading to improve performance or achievement.• Explains the context (environmental factors)

contributing to poor pupils/students performance/achievement.

• Explains why the school is unable to improve achievements despite programs on related to quality education.

TASK TO DO

I. Information Requirements on KPIs for Quality

D. Proposed Actions• Describes measures to undertake to sustain

DepED programs on quality.• Provides suggestions on how to improve

programs on quality to minimize effects of environmental factors contributing to MPS.

• Suggests actions or measures that will address the limitations or weaknesses of DepED programs on quality.

• Suggests new policies and/or enhancements in DepED policies and systems related to quality.

TASK TO DOII. Implementation status of the AIP; 15

Programs, Projects, Activities (PPAs) and Foreign Assisted Projects (FAP) including NGO Projects, if any:

• Using S-Curve, the school will report the implementation of the following in term of its Physical and Financial accomplishment (Actual vs Target – just make assumption only for the first month of 2015):

1. AIP Implementation,2. Implementation Status of the 15 PPAs (SPED, MG,

Madrasah, etc.) and3. Any Foreign-Assisted Projects (FAP) including NGO

Projects: Save the Children, UNICEF, Pasali, Plan International, etc.

TASK TO DO

III. Agenda affecting program design, policy, standard, system and technical assistance needed.

• Provides suggestions on how to improve programs on quality to minimize effects of environmental factors contributing to KPI on Quality.

• Suggests actions or measures that will address the limitations or weaknesses of DepED programs.

• Suggests new policies and/or enhancements in DepED policies and systems related to KPI on Quality.

PRESENTER BY BATCH

Batch II-A: Elementary• Cluster A: North Cotabato, Sarangani, Cotabato

City• Cluster B: North Cotabato: Group 1, 2 & 3

Batch II-B: Elementary• Cluster A: GSC, South Cotabato, Kidapawan• Cluster B: Sultan Kudarat, Koronadal, Tacurong

Batch III: Secondary• Cluster A: North Cot., GSC, Kidapawan City• Cluster B: Sultan Kudarat, Cotabato City,

Koronadal, Sarangani, Tacurong, South Cotabato

ROLE OF THE SCHOOL PLANNING TEAM (SPT) & SCHOOL HEAD IN THE SMEPA AS

CONVENORSMEPA DESIGN

ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION PERSONS IN-CHARGE

1. Opening Presentation of Objectives, Activity flow and Roll call of attendance

EMCEE & Opening Speaker

2. Presentation by Grade Level / Department Heads

Each of the Grade Level / Department Heads presents their findings on the KPI , Physical & Financial Accomplishments of (AIP)

Curriculum Level / Department Heads

3. Discussion of Presentation

Discussion leader pose questions to the presenter to clarify essential points every after presentation.

School Discussion Leaders

4. Synthesis of Discussion

A synthesizer listens to all presentations and discussions and gives the summary of the main points. The synthesizer list down all the issues and concerns on which decisions need to be made.

School Synthesizer & Documenter

5. Agreement The SH discusses the issues listed and leads the group in coming up with agreements on program adjustments, Policy Directions to be flagged to SDO as well as TA needs

SH/PSDS

SAMPLE SET-UP OF SMEPA: QUALITY (1st Quarter)

SGC

SGC

SGC

SGC

Eng.Coord

.

Math

Coord.

SciCoord

.

Fil.Coord

.

BLGU

APCoord

.

Special Progra

m Coord.

GC PSDS/SCHSH

PTAPres

.

Legend:

PSDS – Public Schools District SupervisorSCH – Secondary Cluster HeadBLGU – Barangay LGUSH – School HeadSGC – School Governing CouncilPTA – Parents-Teachers AssociationGC – Guidance Counselor (Designate)

SAMPLE SET-UP OF SMEPA: ACCESS ELEMENTARY (Big SCHOOL)

SGC

SGC

SGC

SGC

Kin-der

Grade 1

Level Chair

Grade 2

Level Chair

BLGU

GCPSDS/

SCH

Prin-cipal

PTAPres

.

Grade 3

Level Chair

AP/AH

Grade 4

Level Chair

Grade 5

Level Chair

Grade 6

Level Chair

Legend:

PSDS – Public Schools District SupervisorSCH – Secondary Cluster HeadAP – Assistant PrincipalAH – Academic HeadBLGU – Barangay LGUSGC – School Governing CouncilPTA – Parents-Teachers AssociationGC – Guidance Counselor (Designate)

SAMPLE SET-UP OF SMEPA: ACCESS SECONDARY

SGC

SGC

SGC

SGC

Grade 7

Chair

Grade 8

Level Chair

Grade 9

Level Chair

BLGU

GC

SCHPrin-cipal

PTAPres

.

Grade 10 Level Chair

AP/AH

Legend:

SCH – Secondary Cluster HeadAP – Assistant PrincipalAH – Academic HeadBLGU – Barangay LGUSGC – School Governing CouncilPTA – Parents-Teachers AssociationGC – Guidance Counselor (Designate)

SIMULATION TIME ALLOTMENT:

1. Opening Program ……………………………. 5 minutes2. Presentation …………………………………… 20 Minutes Part I: Group 1: Quality: NAT MPS by Subject (Subject Coordinator)Group 2: Access: Enrolment Pattern (Grade Level Chairman)Group 3: Access: Drop-out - PARDOs/SARDOs (Grade Level Chairman)

Part II: (Only if applicable) * AIP Implementation (School Head) * 15 nationally-funded PPAs: SPED/SPA/SPS

(Coordinator) * Other PPAs from FAP or NGOs (School Head) Part III: Agenda affecting program design, policy, standard,

system and technical assistance needed (School Head)3. Interpellation/Discussion…………………………. 7 minutes 4. Synthesis ……………………………………………… 2 minutes5. Agreement …………………………………………….. 3 minutes

ANALYSIS

1.How did you find the activity?2. What went well in the

simulation activity?3.What did not go well?4.What needs to be improved?

Why?5.What learning insights have you

gained from the activity?

TIME TO REFLECT

In DepEd XII we uphold the Principle:

One Message, One Character, One Direction!