7
Wikipedia copyright Policy Copyright policy Copyright violation policy Reusing Wikipedia content Text of CC BYSA 3.0 Unported License Text of the GFDL Guidelines Public domain content Nonfree content NonU.S. copyrights Copying within Wikipedia Copyright information index Processes Copyright problems Suspected copyright violations Possibly unfree files Contributor copyright investigations Resources General help Copyright assistance Media copyright questions Requesting copyright permission File copyright tags Donating copyrighted material Guidance for textrelated copyright problems Copying isn't the only way to violate copyright or plagiarize. Close paraphrasing can be a problem, too. Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia While this essay is not a Wikipedia policy or guideline itself, it is intended to supplement the Wikipedia:Copyright violation policy and the Wikipedia:Plagiarism guideline, to which editors should defer in case of inconsistency between that page and this one. This page in a nutshell: Summarize in your own words instead of closely paraphrasing. Closely paraphrased material that infringes on the copyright of its source material should be rewritten or deleted to avoid infringement, and to ensure that it complies with Wikipedia policy. Public domain sources and CCBYSAcompatible sources may be closely paraphrased, and limited close paraphrasing of copyrighted sources may also be permitted as fair use. Attribution is always required. For information on copy and pasting text, see Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources. Close paraphrasing is the superficial modification of material from another source. Editors should generally summarize source material in their own words, adding inline citations as required by the sourcing policy. Limited close paraphrasing is appropriate within reason, as is quoting (with or without quotation marks), so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text – for example, by adding "John Smith wrote ...," together with a footnote containing the citation at the end of the clause, sentence or paragraph. Close paraphrasing without intext attribution may constitute plagiarism, and when extensive (with or without in text attribution) may also violate Wikipedia's copyright policy, which forbids Wikipedia contributors from copying material directly from other sources. Public domain material must likewise be attributed to avoid plagiarism. If the source material bears a free copyright license that is compatible with Wikipedia's licenses, copying or closely paraphrasing it is not a copyright violation so long as the source is attributed somewhere in the article, usually at the end. The best way to prevent close paraphrasing is to understand clearly when it is a problem, how to avoid it, and how to address it when it appears. Contents 1 Concepts 1.1 Copyright law 1.2 Creative expression 1.3 Moral rights 1.4 Substantial similarity 1.5 Wikipedia's guidelines 2 When is close paraphrase permitted? 2.1 Public domain or compatiblylicensed content 2.2 Quotation of nonfree text 2.3 When there are a limited number of ways to say the same thing 3 Example 4 How to write acceptable content 5 Existing close paraphrasing 5.1 Detecting 5.2 Addressing 5.2.1 Example approaches to discussing with other editors 5.2.1.1 Extensive problems 5.2.1.2 Limited problems 6 Relevant policies and guidelines 7 See also 8 References 9 External links Concepts There are legal, ethical, and organizational standard considerations regarding the use of close paraphrasing. Copyright law Wikipedia's primary concern is with the legal constraints imposed by copyright law. Close paraphrasing of the creative expression in a nonfree copyrighted source is likely to be an infringement of the copyright of the source. In many countries close paraphrasing may be also seen as mutilation or distortion of an author's work, infringing on their moral rights. Creative expression Facts and ideas cannot be protected by copyright, but creative expression is protected. The test of creativity is minimal. Although facts are not subject to copyright, a selection or arrangement of facts may be considered creative and therefore protected. For example, an alphabetical list of states in the USA giving their name, size and population cannot be copyrighted. However, a shorter list of states giving the name, size and population as before, but ranked as the "top most livable states" would be subject to copyright. The selection and ranking is creative. Moral rights Main page: Wikipedia:Moral rights

Wikipedia_Close Paraphrasing - Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Close Paraphrasing in Wikipedia - important for people who intend to contribute or write an article.

Citation preview

  • 25/05/2015 Wikipedia:CloseparaphrasingWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing 1/7

    Wikipediacopyright

    Policy

    CopyrightpolicyCopyrightviolationpolicyReusingWikipediacontent

    TextofCCBYSA3.0UnportedLicenseTextoftheGFDL

    Guidelines

    PublicdomaincontentNonfreecontent

    NonU.S.copyrightsCopyingwithinWikipediaCopyrightinformationindex

    Processes

    CopyrightproblemsSuspectedcopyrightviolations

    PossiblyunfreefilesContributorcopyrightinvestigations

    Resources

    GeneralhelpCopyrightassistance

    MediacopyrightquestionsRequestingcopyrightpermission

    FilecopyrighttagsDonatingcopyrightedmaterial

    Guidancefortextrelatedcopyrightproblems

    Copyingisn'ttheonlywaytoviolatecopyrightorplagiarize.Closeparaphrasingcanbeaproblem,too.

    Wikipedia:CloseparaphrasingFromWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia

    WhilethisessayisnotaWikipediapolicyorguidelineitself,itisintendedtosupplementtheWikipedia:CopyrightviolationpolicyandtheWikipedia:Plagiarismguideline,towhicheditorsshoulddeferincaseofinconsistencybetweenthatpageandthisone.

    Thispageinanutshell:Summarizeinyourownwordsinsteadofcloselyparaphrasing.Closelyparaphrasedmaterialthatinfringesonthecopyrightofitssourcematerialshouldberewrittenordeletedtoavoidinfringement,andtoensurethatitcomplieswithWikipediapolicy.PublicdomainsourcesandCCBYSAcompatiblesourcesmaybecloselyparaphrased,andlimitedcloseparaphrasingofcopyrightedsourcesmayalsobepermittedasfairuse.Attributionisalwaysrequired.

    Forinformationoncopyandpastingtext,seeWikipedia:Copyingtextfromothersources.

    Closeparaphrasingisthesuperficialmodificationofmaterialfromanothersource.Editorsshouldgenerallysummarizesourcematerialintheirownwords,addinginlinecitationsasrequiredbythesourcingpolicy.

    Limitedcloseparaphrasingisappropriatewithinreason,asisquoting(withorwithoutquotationmarks),solongasthematerialisclearlyattributedinthetextforexample,byadding"JohnSmithwrote...,"togetherwithafootnotecontainingthecitationattheendoftheclause,sentenceorparagraph.

    Closeparaphrasingwithoutintextattributionmayconstituteplagiarism,andwhenextensive(withorwithoutintextattribution)mayalsoviolateWikipedia'scopyrightpolicy,whichforbidsWikipediacontributorsfromcopyingmaterialdirectlyfromothersources.Publicdomainmaterialmustlikewisebeattributedtoavoidplagiarism.IfthesourcematerialbearsafreecopyrightlicensethatiscompatiblewithWikipedia'slicenses,copyingorcloselyparaphrasingitisnotacopyrightviolationsolongasthesourceisattributedsomewhereinthearticle,usuallyattheend.

    Thebestwaytopreventcloseparaphrasingistounderstandclearlywhenitisaproblem,howtoavoidit,andhowtoaddressitwhenitappears.

    Contents

    1Concepts1.1Copyrightlaw1.2Creativeexpression1.3Moralrights1.4Substantialsimilarity1.5Wikipedia'sguidelines

    2Wheniscloseparaphrasepermitted?2.1Publicdomainorcompatiblylicensedcontent2.2Quotationofnonfreetext2.3Whentherearealimitednumberofwaystosaythesamething

    3Example4Howtowriteacceptablecontent5Existingcloseparaphrasing

    5.1Detecting5.2Addressing

    5.2.1Exampleapproachestodiscussingwithothereditors5.2.1.1Extensiveproblems5.2.1.2Limitedproblems

    6Relevantpoliciesandguidelines7Seealso8References9Externallinks

    Concepts

    Therearelegal,ethical,andorganizationalstandardconsiderationsregardingtheuseofcloseparaphrasing.

    Copyrightlaw

    Wikipedia'sprimaryconcerniswiththelegalconstraintsimposedbycopyrightlaw.Closeparaphrasingofthecreativeexpressioninanonfreecopyrightedsourceislikelytobeaninfringementofthecopyrightofthesource.Inmanycountriescloseparaphrasingmaybealsoseenasmutilationordistortionofanauthor'swork,infringingontheirmoralrights.

    Creativeexpression

    Factsandideascannotbeprotectedbycopyright,butcreativeexpressionisprotected.Thetestofcreativityisminimal.

    Althoughfactsarenotsubjecttocopyright,aselectionorarrangementoffactsmaybeconsideredcreativeandthereforeprotected.Forexample,analphabeticallistofstatesintheUSAgivingtheirname,sizeandpopulationcannotbecopyrighted.However,ashorterlistofstatesgivingthename,sizeandpopulationasbefore,butrankedasthe"topmostlivablestates"wouldbesubjecttocopyright.Theselectionandrankingiscreative.

    Moralrights

    Mainpage:Wikipedia:Moralrights

  • 25/05/2015 Wikipedia:CloseparaphrasingWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing 2/7

    Wikipediadoesnothaveanofficialpolicyregardingmoralrightsofauthors.

    The"moralrights"ofanauthorareindependentofcopyrightownership.Theyincludetheauthor'srighttocontrolfirstpublicationofaworktheauthor'srighttobeattributedortoremainanonymoustheauthor'srightfortheworktobepublishedwithoutdistortionormutilation.Aswithcopyright,moralrightsapplytocreativeexpressionbutnottomerefacts.RespectingmoralrightscanhelpensurethatWikipediacontentcanbereusedaswidelyaspossible.

    Inaccordancewithverifiabilitypolicy,Wikipediaeditorsshouldnotuseunpublishedwork.Withpublishedwork,editorsshouldattributeeachsourcetotheauthorwherethepublicationnamestheauthor,andattributethesourcetothepublicationifitdoesnotnametheauthor.Itissometimesrelevantforanarticletoincludeashortquotationsuchasasignificantstatementmadebythesubjectofthearticleoranotablecommentaboutthesubject.Inthesecasesaverbatimquotationshouldbegivenratherthanaparaphrase.QuotationsshouldbeusedverysparinglyandmustbeclearlyidentifiedandformattedasdefinedinMOS:QUOTE.

    Substantialsimilarity

    Paraphrasingrisestothelevelofcopyrightinfringementwhenthereissubstantialsimilaritybetweenanarticleandacopyrightedsource.Thismayexistwhenthecreativeexpressioninanimportantpassageofthesourcehasbeencloselyparaphrased,evenifitisasmallportionofthesource,orwhenparaphrasingislooserbutcoversalargerpartofthesourceorcovers"theheart"(themostessentialcontent).Acloseparaphraseofonesentencefromabookmaybeoflowconcern,whileacloseparaphraseofoneparagraphofatwoparagrapharticlewouldbeconsideredaseriousviolation.Editorsmustthereforetakeparticularcarewhenwritinganarticle,orasectionofanarticle,thathasmuchthesamescopeasasinglesource.Theeditormustbeextracarefulinthesecasestoextractthefactsaloneandpresentthefactsinplainlanguage,withoutcarryingforwardanythingthatcouldbeconsidered"creativeexpression".

    UnderUScopyrightlaw,however,substantialsimilaritydoesnotalwaysindicateinfringement.Itdoesnotindicateinfringement,forinstance,wherethedoctrineoffairusepermitstheuseofthematerial.[1]Wikipediadeliberatelyadoptsanarrowerlimitationandexceptionfromcopyrightthanfairuse.OurpolicyandguidelinearesetoutatWikipedia:Nonfreecontent.

    Substantialsimilarityisalsoimmaterialwhenstrongevidenceexiststhatthecontentwascreatedindependently.[2]Anauthormaythinktheyarebeingoriginalwhentheywrite"CharlesdeGaullewasatoweringstatesman",notrealizingthatmanyotherauthorshaveindependentlycomeupwiththeseidenticalwords.Whatlookslikecopyingorcloseparaphrasingmaythusbeaccidental.Thesesimilaritiesaremorelikelytoexistwherecontentislesscreativeandmoreformulaic.Independentcreationislesslikelywhenthereisevidencethatthesourcewasconsultedorclosefollowingisextensive.

    Wikipedia'sguidelines

    Evenwhencontentisverifiablypublicdomainorreleasedunderacompatiblefreelicense,closeparaphrasingmaybeatoddswithWikipedia'sguidelinerelatedtoplagiarism(seeWikipedia:Plagiarism).Whileinthiscontext,too,closeparaphrasingofasinglesentenceisnotasmuchofaconcern,ifacontributorcloselyparaphrasespublicdomainorfreelylicensedcontent,heorsheshouldexplicitlyacknowledgethatcontentiscloselyparaphrased.(Seeabove.)

    Anotherpotentialproblemariseswhenacontributorcopiesorcloselyparaphrasesabiasedsourceeitherpurposefullyorwithoutunderstandingthebias.Thiscanmakethearticleappeartodirectlyespousethebiasofthesource,whichviolatesourneutralpointofviewpolicy.

    Wheniscloseparaphrasepermitted?

    Furtherinformation:Wikipedia:FAQ/CopyrightCanIaddsomethingtoWikipediathatIgotfromsomewhereelse?

    Thereareafewspecificsituationswhencloseparaphrasingispermitted.Ifinformationisgatheredfromthepublicdomainorisfreeusecontent,closeparaphrasemaybeacceptable.Insomeinstancesitishelpfultocapturethewordsaswritten,inwhichcasetheguidelinesforQuotationsapply.Lastly,theremaybesomeinstanceswhereit'sdifficulttoparaphrasebecauseofthenatureofthecontentinsuchcases,thereareacoupleoftipsbelowabouthowtolimitthedegreeofcloseparaphrasingtoavoidissues.

    Whenusingacloseparaphraselegitimately,citingasourceisinmostcasesrequiredandhighlyrecommended.[3]

    Publicdomainorcompatiblylicensedcontent

    Insomelimitedcases,closeparaphrasemaybeanacceptablewayofwritinganarticle.Forexample,manyWikipediaarticlesare(orwere)basedontextfromthe1911EncyclopediaBritannica(seeWikipedia:1911EncyclopaediaBritannica).Ifthesourceisinthepublicdomain,suchasworkoftheU.S.government,orisavailableunderalicensecompatiblewiththeCCBYSAlicense(apartialtableoflicensecompatibilitycanbefoundattheCopyrightFAQ,)thenthesourcemaybecloselyparaphrasedifthesourceisappropriatelyattributed.Attributioninsuchinstancesmayincludeintextattributionthatmakesclearwhosewordsorideasarebeingused(e.g."JohnSmithwrotethat...")ormayincludemoregeneralattributionthatindicatesthematerialoriginatesfromafreesource,eitheraspartofaninlinecitationorasageneralnoticeinthearticle's"References"section(forfurtherinformationonhowtoattributefreesources,seeWikipedia:Plagiarism#Copyingmaterialfromfreesources).

    Quotationofnonfreetext

    Limitedquotationfromnonfreecopyrightedsourcesisallowed,asdiscussedinWikipedia'snonfreecontentpolicyandguideline.Quotationsshouldhaveintextattributionandshouldbecitedtotheiroriginalsourceorauthor(seeWP:Whentocite).Withdirectquotation,editorsshouldclearlydistinguishthequotedmaterialfromtheoriginaltextofthearticlefollowingtheguidelinesforquotations.Extensiveuseofquotationfromnonfreesourcesisgenerallynotacceptable.Evenifcontentisattributed,itcanstillcreatecopyrightproblemsifthetakingistoosubstantial.Toavoidthisrisk,Wikipediakeepsthislikeothernonfreecontentminimal.

    Quotationfromnonfreesourcesmaybeappropriatewhentheexactwordsinthesourcearerelevanttothearticle,notjustthefactsorideasgivenbythesource.Examplesmayincludestatementsmadebyapersondiscussedinthearticle,briefexcerptsfromabookdescribedinthearticle,orsignificantopinionsaboutthesubjectofthearticle.Quotationshouldnot,however,betreatedasanalternativetoextractingfactsandpresentingtheminplainlanguage.Thus:

    Right:Churchillsaid,"Ihavenothingtoofferbutblood,toil,tearsandsweat."[1]Right:TheNewYorkTimesreviewerfoundthefilm"pretentiousandboring".[2]Wrong:AccordingtoBulgarianButterflies,"thepatientobservermaybefortunateenoughtoglimpsethisraremothflittingalongthemossybanksofawoodlandstream."[3]

    Whentherearealimitednumberofwaystosaythesamething

    Closeparaphrasingisalsopermittedwhenthereareonlyalimitednumberofwaystosaythesamething.Thismaybethecasewhenthereisnoreasonablewaytoavoidusingtitlesandtechnicalterm,andmayalsobethecasewithsimplestatementsoffact.

  • 25/05/2015 Wikipedia:CloseparaphrasingWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing 3/7

    Itisacceptabletouseatitleortechnicaltermsuchas"TheWaroftheSpanishSuccession"or"RelationalDatabaseManagementSystem(RDBMS)"whenthetermiscommonlyusedbysourcesthatdiscussthesubject.Copyrightlawdoesnotprotectnames,titles,orshortphrasesorexpressions.[4]

    Anexampleofcloselyparaphrasedsimplestatementsoffactisgivenbyabiographythatreliesontwosourcesforthebasicoutline.Thesourcesandthearticlestartwith:

    Source1:JohnSmithwasborninHartford,ConnecticutonFebruary2nd1949...HeattendedStateUniversity,obtaininganM.D.in1973.Source2:JohnSmithwasbornon2February1949inHartford...HegraduatedwithamedicaldegreefromStateUniversityin1973.Article:JohnSmithwasbornon2February1949inHartford,Connecticut...HestudiedmedicineatStateUniversity,andearnedanM.D.in1973.

    Inthisexample,thewordingofthearticleisveryclosetothatofbothsources.However,thearticlemerelypresentsstandardfactsforatopiclikethisinstandardsequence.Thearticledoesnotcopyanycreativewordsorphrases,similesormetaphors,andmakesaneffortatparaphrasinginthesecondsentence.Justtwoshortsentencesareclosetothesources.Forthesereasonsthecloseparaphrasingshouldbeacceptable.Note,however,thatcloselyparaphrasingextensivelyfromanonfreesourcemaybeacopyrightproblem,evenifitisdifficulttofinddifferentmeansofexpression.Themoreextensivelywerelyonthisexception,themorelikelywearetorunafoulofcompilationprotection.[5]

    Example

    Inthisexample,Wikipedia'sarticletextisanattemptatparaphrasingthesource.However,almostalloftheoriginalwordchoice,wordorderandsentencestructureisretained.

    Source[6] Closeparaphrase[7]

    "Astatementfromthereceiver,DavidCarsonofDeloitte,confirmedthat480ofthe670employeeshavebeenmaderedundant...Atleast100WaterfordCrystalemployeesarerefusingtoleavethevisitors'galleryatthefactorytonightandarestaginganunofficialsitin.TheemployeessaytheywillnotbeleavinguntiltheymeetwithMr.Carson.Thereweresomescufflesatonepointandamaindoortothevisitors'centrewasdamaged...LocalSinnFinCouncillorJoeKelly,whoisoneofthosecurrentlyoccupyingthevisitors'gallery,saidthereceiverhadtoldstaffhewouldnotclosethecompanywhiletherewereinterestedinvestors."

    "Astatementissuedbythereceiver,Deloitte'sDavidCarson,confirmedthat,ofthe670employees,480ofthemwouldbelaidoff.Theworkersrespondedangrilytothisunexpecteddecisionandatleast100ofthembegananunofficialsitininthevisitors'galleryatthefactorythatnight.TheyinsistedtheywouldrefusetoleaveuntiltheyhadmetwithCarson.Followingtherevelations,therewasaminorscuffleduringwhichthemaindoortothevisitors'centrewasdamaged.LocalSinnFinCouncillorJoeKellywasamongstthosewhooccupiedthevisitors'gallery."

    Analysis:

    "Astatementissuedbythereceiver,Deloitte'sDavidCarson,confirmedthat,ofthe670employees,480ofthemwouldbelaidoff"vs."Astatementfromthereceiver,DavidCarsonofDeloitte,confirmedthat480ofthe670employeeshavebeenmaderedundant".

    ThestructureofWikipedia'sstatementisessentiallythesameastheoriginal.Changingasinglewordandslightlyreorderingonephraseisnotenoughtoconstituteaparaphrase.

    "TheyinsistedtheywouldrefusetoleaveuntiltheyhadmetwithCarson"vs."TheemployeessaytheywillnotbeleavinguntiltheymeetwithMr.Carson".Thestructureofthissentenceisthesameastheoriginalwithtoomuchsimilaritywithinthestructureoftheparagraph.

    "therewasaminorscuffleduringwhichthemaindoortothevisitors'centrewasdamaged"vs."Thereweresomescufflesatonepointandamaindoortothevisitors'centrewasdamaged".

    Thestructureandlanguageofthetwosentencesarethesame."LocalSinnFinCouncillorJoeKellywasamongstthosewhooccupiedthevisitors'gallery"vs."LocalSinnFinCouncillorJoeKelly,whoisoneofthosecurrentlyoccupyingthevisitors'gallery".

    Thisslightrewordingdoesnotchangethefactthattheunderlyingstructureandlanguagearethesame.Minorchanges,suchas"wasamongstthose">"isoneofthose"and"occupied">"currentlyoccupying",arenotenoughtoconstituteanoriginalrewritingofthepassage.

    Seebelowforanexampleofanunusableparaphraserepairedtobecomeacceptable.

    Howtowriteacceptablecontent

    Toproperlyparaphrasecontent,youreviewinformationfromreliablesources,extractthesalientpoints,anduseyourownwords,styleandsentencestructuretodrafttextforanarticle.[8][9]

    Takenotes

    Oneofthekeyfactorsinthecreationofinadvertentcloseparaphrasingisstartingwithtexttakendirectlyfromthesource.Thewordchoiceandstylecaneasilyresurfacesinceitisforemostinourminds.Anapproachtoensurethatinformationisfullyunderstoodandformedintouniquethoughtsistoisolatetheessentialinformationbytakingnotes.

    Startoffbytakingnotesofessentialinformationonly,excludingtheuseofphrases.Recordthesourceforthecitation.Collectinformationfrommultiplesources.Thiswillhaveseveralbenefits:itpromotesatonewithaneutralpointofviewandproducesawellroundedunderstandingofthetopic.Italsomakesitlesslikelythatyourendresultwillfollowtoocloselyonanyonesource.Gathershortquotationswhentheypowerfullyillustrateapointforyourarticle.Overusecanresultinadisjointedarticleandmaybreachcopyright.(Extensivequotationsareforbiddenbypolicy.)

    Writeadraft

    Gatherrelateditemsfromthemultiplesourcesandexplainittoyourself:Thepointistorephraseorsummarizeabodyofinformationinyourownwordsandsentencestructure.Addinlinecitationsinaccordancewiththesourcingguideline.Allowtimebetweennotetakinganddraftingtoclearyourmindoftheoriginaldictionandbetterparaphrasethecontent.Don'tparaphraseinformationinthesameorderitwaspresentedfromthesource.

    Review

    Aftermaterialhasbeenwritten,returntothesourcetodoublecheckforcontentandproperlyparaphrasedlanguage.

    Informationhasbeengatheredfromseveralsourcesanddistilledinyourwords.Quotationsareusedappropriatelyandinfrequently.Wordsorideasdonotfollowthesamepatternandorderasthesourcematerial.

  • 25/05/2015 Wikipedia:CloseparaphrasingWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing 4/7

    Theexampleaboveonthispageillustratesacommonwayinwhichpeoplecloselyparaphrasecontentthisonedemonstrateshowtoproperlysynthesizeandparaphraseinformation.

    Example:closeparaphrasingrepaired

    Considerthefollowingexampleofa"closeparaphrase"(unacceptableversion)andwaystocorrectittomakeanacceptableversion:

    Example Wording CommentsSource BorninSlavery:SlaveNarrativesfromtheFederalWriters'Project,19361938containsmorethan

    2,300firstpersonaccountsofslaveryand500blackandwhitephotographsofformerslaves.Thesenarrativeswerecollectedinthe1930saspartoftheFederalWriters'ProjectoftheWorksProgressAdministration(WPA)andassembledandmicrofilmedin1941astheseventeenvolumeSlaveNarratives:AFolkHistoryofSlaveryintheUnitedStatesfromInterviewswithFormerSlaves.ThisonlinecollectionisajointpresentationoftheManuscriptandPrintsandPhotographsDivisionsoftheLibraryofCongressandincludesmorethan200photographsfromthePrintsandPhotographsDivisionthatarenowmadeavailabletothepublicforthefirsttime.BorninSlaverywasmadepossiblebyamajorgiftfromtheCitigroupFoundation.Source:BorninSlavery,LibraryofCongress(http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/snhtml/snhome.html)

    Unacceptableversion Acollectionofmorethan2,300accountsofslaverytakendirectlyfromformerslavesand500blackandwhitephotographsmakeuptheBorninSlavery:SlaveNarrativesfromtheFederalWriters'Project,19361938.Inthe1930sthesenarrativeswerecompiledinthe1930saspartoftheFederalWriters'ProjectoftheWorksProgressAdministration(WPA).Theywereaggregatedandmicrofilmedin1941astheseventeenvolumeSlaveNarratives:AFolkHistoryofSlaveryintheUnitedStatesfromInterviewswithFormerSlaves.ThecollectionisaunitedeffortoftheManuscriptandPrintsandPhotographsDivisionsoftheLibraryofCongress.CitigroupFoundationmadetheBorninSlaverypossiblebyamajorgift.

    Thestructureofthisversionisessentiallythesameastheoriginal.Changingafewwordsandslightlyreorderingphrasesisnotenoughtoconstituteaparaphrase.

    Correctingissuesstep1)Bringinothersource(s).

    TheSlaveNarrativeCollectionprovidesauniqueandvirtuallyunsurpassedcollectiveportraitofahistoricalpopulation.Indeed,historianDavidBrionDavishasarguedthatthevoluminousnumberofdocumentedslavetestimoniesavailableintheUnitedStates"isindisputablyuniqueamongformerslaveholdingnations."Inadditiontothesubstantialnumberoflifehistoriesitcontains,themostcompellingfeatureofthecollectionisthecompositionofthesampleofpeoplewhomadeupitsinformants.Althoughnotarepresentativesampleoftheslavepopulation,theywerearemarkablydiverseandinclusivecrosssectionofformerslaves.Thosewhosevoicesareincludedinthecollectionrangedinagefromonetofiftyatthetimeofemancipationin1865,whichmeantthatmorethantwothirdswereovereightywhentheywereinterviewed.Source:ACollectivePortrait(http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/snhtml/snintro01.html)

    Bringinginothersourceshelpstoensurethatthere'sagoodunderstandingofthetopicandaneutralpointofview.

    Correctingissuesstep2)Readsourceinformation,preferablytakingnotestoextractessentialpoints,andwriteasummaryinyourownwords,therebyproducinganacceptableversion.

    Inthe1930saWorksProgressAdministration(WPA)project,calledFederalWriters'Project,wasconductedtocapturethehistoryrecordofpeoplebornintoslavery.Atthetimeoftheproject2/3rdsofthemorethan2,300menandwomeninterviewedwereovertheageofeighty,havingbeenonetofiftyyearsofagewhentheyobtainedtheirfreedomin1865.Over500blackandwhitephotographsweretakenofinterviewsubjects.TheLibraryofCongressManuscriptandPrintandPhotographDivisionsassembledaseventeenvolumecollectionfromtheset,called"BorninSlavery:SlaveNarrativesfromtheFederalWriters'Project,19361938."DavidBrionDavis,ahistorian,claimedthatthelargecollection"isindisputablyuniqueamongformerslaveholdingnations."

    Thisversionbringstogetherinformationfromtwosources,withoutmaintainingtheprevioussentencestructureorstyle.

    Seealso:Wikipedia:Theperfectarticle

    Existingcloseparaphrasing

    Detecting

    Unlikestraightforwardcopyrightviolations,closeparaphrasingisnotoriouslydifficulttodetectfrequentlythecontributorwilladdwikisyntaxandwriteinthestyleofaWikipediaarticle.Herearesomewaysyoumightdetectit:

    Lookfordisjointedandsuddenchangesinthetone,vocabulary,andstyleofcontentintroducedbythesamecontributor.Forexample,"Thecatisasmallpredatorycarnivorousspeciesofcrepuscularmammal.Housecatsliketokillmiceandbats."Lookforredundantcontentthismaybeasignthattwoormoresourceswerecloselyparaphrased.Forexample,"Thecatisasmallpredatorycarnivorousspeciesofcrepuscularmammal.Likemanypets,domesticcatsarecarnivorous."Lookforcontentthatresemblescontentincludedinaquotation.Examinethetalkpagesofmajorcontributorsandotherpageswheretheyhavewrittenintheirownwords,anddetermineiftheirarticlecontributionssubstantiallydifferintone,structure,andvocabularyfromthesediscussions.Takeshortphrasesfromthearticleandputtheminasearchengine.Takealookattheresultsandseeiftheycloselyresemblethearticle.

    Addressing

    Yourapproachmayvarydependingupontheseverityoftheconcern.Hereareacoupleofwaystomanagecloseparaphraseconcerns.

    Flagtheproblem

    Insertacloseparaphrasetemplateorfollowcopyrightinfringementdiscussion:Yourapproachheremaydependupontheextensivenessoftheissuesyoudiscover.

    Youcanusethe{{Closeparaphrasing}}template,whichcanbecustomizedtoidentifythesourceandtoindicateifthesourceispublicdomain,tomarkitforcleanup:

    Thisarticleorsectioncontainscloseparaphrasingofoneormorenonfreecopyrightedsources.Ideasinthisarticleshouldbeexpressedinanoriginalmanner.Seethetalkpagefordetails.

    However,ifyoubelievethatthecloseparaphrasinginquestionissoclosethatitinfringescopyright,insteadfollowtheinstructionsatTemplate:Copyvio,whichmayrequireremovingtheparaphrasingcontentuntilitcanberepaired.Unlesscloseparaphrasingisimmediatelyobvious,itisgoodpracticetocitespecificpassagesalongsidethecorrespondingpassagefromthesourceonthetalkpagetohighlighttheirsimilaritythiswillprovideobjectiveevidenceofclose

  • 25/05/2015 Wikipedia:CloseparaphrasingWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing 5/7

    paraphrasing.

    Noticetothecontributor

    Itisimportanttodiscussyourconcernswiththecontributor.Manypeoplewhoparaphrasetoocloselyarenotintentionallyinfringing,butjustdon'tknowhowtoproperlyparaphrase.Itmighthelptopointthemtothisessayortothereferencesandresourceslistedhere,whichincludesomepointersforproperparaphrasing.

    Exampleapproachestodiscussingwithothereditors

    Note:Alltextintheseexamplesisdedicatedbyitsauthorstothepublicdomain

    Thefollowingexamplemessagescanbecopiedandpasteddirectlyfromthispage,althoughyouwillneedtofillinyourownexamplecloseparaphrasesaswellassupplyingthearticle'stitleandthesourceURL.Themessagesstrivetoavoidaccusationswhileatthesametimepointingtoclearinstructionsonhowtofixerrorsofthissort.Thespacesforexamplesfromtheeditor'sinappropriatetextareprovidedbecauseevenexperiencedorgoodfaitheditorsmaynotrecognizewheretheissuesliewithoutthem.Ifthereisapassageofseveralconsecutivesentenceswhichisacontinuouscloseparaphrase,thismayalonebeasufficientdemonstration.Otherwise,showingthepatterninseveralseparatedsentencesistypicallybetterthanofferingone,briefexample.

    Extensiveproblems

    ThefollowingexamplewasengineeredforcaseswhentheparaphrasingiscloseenoughtorequireblankingofthearticleandlistingatWikipedia:Copyrightproblems.Itwouldnotbeappropriateforsituationswherethe{{closeparaphrasing}}templateisused,sincerewritingcanbedoneonthespotratherthaninatemporarypage.Youmayusethisexampleverbatim,ifyouwish,butmayandshouldmodifyitifitisnotcompletelyappropriatetothecircumstances.

    Limitedproblems

    Thisexamplewasengineeredforcaseswhentheparaphrasingisnotenoughofaconcerntorequireblankingandlistingandthe{{closeparaphrasing}}templateisusedinstead.Youmayusethisexampleverbatim,ifyouwish,butmayandshouldmodifyitifitisnotcompletelyappropriatetothecircumstances.

    Relevantpoliciesandguidelines

    AnumberofWikipediapoliciesandguidelinesarerelevanttothisessay.Theyinclude:

    WP:ORIGINAL.Policystatingthat,whilearticlesshouldbewritteninyourownwords,theyshouldsubstantiallyretainthemeaningofthesourcematerialWP:COPYRIGHT.PolicythatdescribesgeneralprinciplesthatapplytouseofcopyrightedworkWP:COPYVIO.Policythatdescribescopyrightviolationsandhowtoaddressthem.WP:NFCC.PolicythatdefineslimitationsonuseofnonfreecontentWP:NONFREE.GuidelinethatexpandsonWP:NFCCanddescribeswhennonfreematerialmaybeusedunderthe"fairuse"principleWP:PLAGIARISM.Guidelinethatdescribestheimportanceofattributingthesourcesused,evenwhentheymaybeoutofcopyrightWP:MOSQUOTE.Guidelinethatdescribeshowquotationsshouldbefaithfullyreproduced,clearlyidentifiedasquotations

    SeveralWikipediaarticlesdiscussrelatedtopicssuchasCopyrightlawoftheUnitedStates,fairuse,plagiarism,moralrightsandparaphrasingofcopyrightedmaterial.Thesemaybeofinteresttoeditors.However,theymayhaveinaccuraciesoromissions,andWikipediahasabroaderaimofprovidingmaterialthatmaybeusedanywhereforanypurpose,whichimposesfurtherrestrictionsthataredefinedinourpoliciesandguidelines.

    Seealso

    Wikipedia:Plagiarism(guideline)GuidelineonWikipedia'sdefinitionofandapproachtohandlingplagiarismtoavoidmakingtheworkofotherslooklike

    Hi.I'mafraidthe[[ArticleName]]articleyouwrotemaybeaproblemunderourcopyrightpolicies,sincethetextseemsvery[[WP:closeparaphrasing|closelyparaphrased]]from[source].Whilefactsarenotcopyrightable,creativeelementsofpresentationincludingbothstructureandlanguageare.Foranexampleofcloseparaphrasing,considerthefollowing::examplefromsourceThearticlesays::examplefromarticleThereareotherpassagesthatsimilarlyfollowquiteclosely.

    Asawebsitethatiswidelyreadandreused,WikipediatakescopyrightveryseriouslytoprotecttheinterestsoftheholdersofcopyrightaswellasthoseoftheWikimediaFoundationandourreusers.Wikipedia's[[WP:C|copyrightpolicies]]requirethatthecontentwetakefromnonfreesources,asidefrombriefandclearlymarkedquotations,berewrittenfromscratch.

    Thearticlehasbeenreplacedwithanoticeofthesecopyrightconcernsthatincludesdirectionsforresolvingthem.Ifthematerialcanbeverifiedtobe[[Wikipedia:Compatiblelicense|compatiblylicensed]]or[[Wikipedia:Publicdomain|publicdomain]]orif[[WP:IOWN|permissionisprovided]],wecanusetheoriginaltextwithproperattribution.Ifyoucanresolveitthatway,pleaseletmeknowifyouneedassistancewiththosedirections.Otherwise,sothatwecanbesureitdoesnotconstituteaderivativework,thisarticleshouldberewrittenthereisalinktoatemporaryspaceforthatpurposeintheinstructionswhichnowappearinplaceofthearticle.Theessay[[Wikipedia:Closeparaphrasing]]containssomesuggestionsforrewritingthatmayhelpavoidtheseissues.Thearticle[[Wikipedia:WikipediaSignpost/20090413/Dispatches]],whileaboutplagiarismratherthancopyrightconcerns,alsocontainssomesuggestionsforreusingmaterialfromsourcesthatmaybehelpful,beginningunder"Avoidingplagiarism".

    Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsaboutthis.~~~~

    Hi.I'mafraidthe[[ArticleName]]articleyoucontributedtohaspartswhicharevery[[WP:closeparaphrasing|closelyparaphrased]]from[source].Thiscanbeaproblemunderbothour[[WP:C|copyrightpolicies]]andour[[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|guidelineonplagiarism]].

    Whilefactsarenotcopyrightable,creativeelementsofpresentationincludingbothstructureandlanguageare.Foranexampleofcloseparaphrasing,considerthefollowing:Thesourcesays::examplefromsourceThearticlesays::examplefromarticleThisisanexamplethereareotherpassagesthatsimilarlyfollowquiteclosely.

    Asawebsitethatiswidelyreadandreused,WikipediatakescopyrightveryseriouslytoprotecttheinterestsoftheholdersofcopyrightaswellasthoseoftheWikimediaFoundationandourreusers.Wikipedia's[[WP:C|copyrightpolicies]]requirethatthecontentwetakefromnonfreesources,asidefrombriefandclearlymarkedquotations,berewrittenfromscratch.Sothatwecanbesureitdoesnotconstitutea[[derivativework]],thisarticleshouldberevisedtoseparateitfurtherfromitssource.Theessay[[Wikipedia:Closeparaphrasing]]containssomesuggestionsforrewritingthatmayhelpavoidtheseissues.Thearticle[[Wikipedia:WikipediaSignpost/20090413/Dispatches]]alsocontainssomesuggestionsforreusingmaterialfromsourcesthatmaybehelpful,beginningunder"Avoidingplagiarism".

    Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsaboutthis.~~~~

  • 25/05/2015 Wikipedia:CloseparaphrasingWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing 6/7

    yourown.Let'sgetseriousaboutplagiarism,Signpost(dispatch)ThoroughdiscussionofWikipedia'spositionregardingplagiarism,includinghowtoavoidit,goodpracticesandhowtodetectit.Copypaste(informationpage)Informationaboutplagiarismandcopyrightconcernswithcopypaste,whichcannotbedoneexceptinthecaseofshortquotations.Paraphrasingofcopyrightedmaterial(article)Anoverviewofhowcloseparaphrasingistreatedundervariousjurisdictions'copyrightlaws.Ideaexpressiondivide(article)Ideaexpressiondividelimitsthescopeofcopyrightprotectionbydifferentiatinganideafromtheexpressionormanifestationofthatidea.Derivativeworks(copyrightFAQ)Discussionofderivativework:acopyrightconcernwheresomethingthatis"basedonandaclosecopyof"anotherwork.Derivativeworks(talkpage)Discussionofparaphraseandabridgement,acopyrightconcern.Quotationcopyrightandfairuse(essay)Properuseofquotationsinarticles,withcopyrightand"fairuse"considerations.Substantialsimilarity(article)SubstantialsimilarityisthestandarddevelopedandusedbyUnitedStatescourtstodeterminewhetheradefendanthasinfringedthereproductionrightofacopyright.Scnesfaire(article):sometimesthereareonlysomanywaystosaysomethingHowtowriteaplotsummary(essay)Informationabouthowtowriteaplotsummaryforaworkoffiction.PlotonlydescriptionoffictionalworksAmongotherthings,discusseshowtoavoidcopyrightviolationswhenwritingaboutfictionalworks.Plagiarismdetectionincludesalistoffreeandcommercialplagiarismdetectiontools.Template:uwparaphraseuserwarningwhichcanbeusedforuserswhichparaphrasecopyrightedmaterialonWikipedia.

    References1. Keller,BruceP.JeffreyP.Cunard(2001).CopyrightLaw:APractitioner'sGuide.PractisingLawInstitute.p.1141.ISBN1402400500.2. KellerandCunard,1140.3. Anexceptionwouldbewhencloselyparaphrasingacompatiblylicensedsourcethatisnotpermissibleasacitation.Forinstance,onemaycloselyparaphraseanotherWikipedia

    articleorusecontentfromanothercompatiblylicensedusergeneratedwiki,solongasthecontentmeetscorecontentpolicies.Attributionmayberequired,asexplainedatWikipedia:Plagiarism#Copyingmaterialfromfreesources,butcitingitisasourcemightbeagainstpolicy.

    4. "CopyrightProtectionNotAvailableforNames,Titles,orShortPhrases"(http://copyright.gov/circs/circ34.pdf)(PDF).UnitedStatesCopyrightOffice.Retrieved2October2014.5. InFeistPublicationsv.RuralTelephoneService,theUnitedStatesSupremeCourtnotedthatfactualcompilationsofinformationmaybeprotectedwithrespectto"selectionand

    arrangement,solongastheyaremadeindependentlybythecompilerandentailaminimaldegreeofcreativity,"as"[t]hecompilationauthortypicallychooseswhichfactstoinclude,inwhatordertoplacethem,andhowtoarrangethecollecteddatasothattheymaybeusedeffectivelybyreaders"theCourtalsoindicatedthat"originalityisnotastringentstandarditdoesnotrequirethatfactsbepresentedinaninnovativeorsurprisingway"andthat"[t]hevastmajorityofworksmakethegradequiteeasily,astheypossesssomecreativespark,'nomatterhowcrude,humbleorobvious'itmightbe."("Decision"(http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=499&invol=340).FeistPublications,Inc.,v.RuralTelephoneServiceCo.,499U.S.340(1991).)

    6. "StaffprotestoverWaterfordCrystalclosure"(http://www.rte.ie/news/2009/0130/wedgwood.html).Retrieved20110628.7. Wikipediaarticle20082009Irishfinancialcrisis(http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2008%E2%80%932012_Irish_financial_crisis&oldid=283141055),200904118. PurdueOWLcontributors(20100421)."Paraphrase:WriteitinYourOwnWords"(http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/619/01/).TheWritingLab&TheOWLatPurdue

    andPurdueUniversity.Retrieved20110628.9. "HowtoParaphraseWithoutPlagiarizing"(http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/researchsources/includingsources/paraphrasing/without.cfm).ColoradoStateUniversity.19932011.

    Retrieved20110628.

    Externallinks

    Paraphrase:WriteitinYourOwnWords(http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/619/01/),PurdueUniversityHowtoParaphraseWithoutPlagiarizing(http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/researchsources/includingsources/paraphrasing/without.cfm),ColoradoStateUniversity

    EssaysaboutWikipedia

    Essaysonbuilding,editing,anddeletingcontent

    Philosophy

    ArticlesmustbewrittenAvoidvagueintroductionsBeareliablesourceCohesionConcedelostarguments8simplerulesforeditingourencyclopedia

    ExplanationismExternalcriticismofWikipediaHeretobuildanencyclopediaMostideasarebadNoteditingbecauseofWikipediarestriction

    NeutralityofSourcesOversimplificationParadoxesParaphrasingPOVandORfromeditors,sources,andfieldsProduct,process,policyPurpose

    TenSimpleRulesforEditingWikipediaTendentiouseditingTheroleofpoliciesincollaborativeanarchyTherulesareprinciplesTrifectaWikipediainbrief

    WikipediaisanencyclopediaWikipediaisacommunity

    Construction

    100KfeaturedarticlesAnavboxoneverypageAcronymOverkillAdvancedarticleeditingAdvancedtableformattingAdvancedtemplatecoding

    AdvancedtextformattingAlternativestothe"Expand"templateAmnesiatestAnunfinishedhouseisarealproblemArticleshaveahalflifeAutosizingimages

    AvoidmissionstatementsBareURLsBeneutralinformBeefupthatfirstrevisionCherrypickingChildren'slit,adultnewreaders,&largeprintbooks

    CitationoverkillConceptcloudCreatingcontroversialcontentDictionariesassourcesDon'tdemolishthehousewhileit'sstillbeingbuilt

    Don'thopethehousewillbuilditselfDon'tleavegiantbreaksbetweensectionsDon'tpanicEditingonmobiledevicesEditorsarenotmindreaders

    Endorsements(commercial)FeaturedarticlesmayhaveproblemsGiveanarticleachanceIgnoreSTRONGNATfordateformatsInaccuracyLawsources

    LinkrotMineasourceMergeTestMinorsandpersonsjudgedincompetent"Murderof"articlesNoteverystory/event/disasterneedsabiography

    NoteverythingneedsanavboxNothingisinstonePermastubPotential,notjustcurrentstatePrintabilityPruningarticlerevisionsPublicists

    PutalittleeffortintoitRestoringpartofarevertededitRoboticeditingShamconsensusRunaneditathonTemporaryversionsofarticlesThereisadeadline

    ThereisnodeadlineThedeadlineisnowWalledgardenWhatanarticleshouldnotincludeWikipediaisaworkinprogress

    WikipediaisnotbeingwritteninanorganizedfashionTheworldwillnotendtomorrowWritethearticlefirstWritingbetterarticles

    Deletion

    AdjectivesinyourrecommendationsAfDisnotawarzoneArgumentstoavoidindeletiondiscussionsArgumentstoavoidindeletionreviews

    ArgumentstoavoidinimagedeletiondiscussionsArgumentstomakeindeletiondiscussionsAvoidrepeatedargumentsBeforecommentinginadeletiondiscussion

    Buttheremustbesources!ContentremovalDeletethejunkDoesdeletionhelpDon'toveruseshortcutstopolicyandguidelinestowinyourargument

    FollowtheleaderHowtosaveanarticleproposedfordeletionIjustdon'tlikeitImmunityLiarLiarPantsonFireNothingOverzealousdeletion

    RelistingcanbeabusiveWikipediaisnotWhackAMoleWhywasthepageIcreateddeleted?Whattodoifyourarticlegetstaggedforspeedydeletion

    Whenindoubt,hideitinthewoodwork

    Essaysoncivility

    ThebasicsHowtobecivilCompromiseAcceptingotherusersEnjoyyourselfThankyouApologizingTruceDivisivenessEncouragingnewcomers

    RelationshipswithacademiceditorsHighfunctioningautismandAsperger'seditors

  • 25/05/2015 Wikipedia:CloseparaphrasingWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing 7/7

    PhilosophyAnuncivilenvironmentisapoorenvironmentBetheglueCivilitywarningsDeletionasrevengeFailureForgiveandforgetIt'snottheendoftheworld

    NobodycaresMostpeoplewhodisagreewithyouoncontentarenotvandalsStayingcoolwhentheeditinggetshotThegreyzoneThelastword

    TherulesofpolitediscourseThereisnocommonsenseWikipediaisnotaboutwinningWritingfortheopponent

    Dos

    AssumegoodfaithAssumetheassumptionofgoodfaithAssumenoclueAssumeclueAvoidpersonalremarksAvoidtheword"vandal"Callaspadeaspade

    CandorDropthestickandbackslowlyawayfromthehorsecarcassDenyrecognitionEncouragefulldiscussionsGetoveritHowtoloseJustdropit

    MindyourownbusinessKeepitdowntoearth

    Don'ts

    Don'tgiveafuckDon'tbeinconsiderateDon'tberudeDon'tcallaspadeaspadeDon'tcallthekettleblackDon'ttakethebaitDonotinsultthevandals

    Don'tcomedownlikeatonofbricksDon'tbeashamedDon'tdrinktheconsensusKoolAidDon'tspiteyourfaceDon'tcallthingscruftNoangrymastodons

    No,youcan'thaveaponyDon'tbeanostrichDon'ttemplatetheregularsDon'tbeafanatic

    Don'taccusesomeoneofapersonalattackforaccusingofapersonalattackDon'tfightfirewithfireDon'tbeprejudicedDon'tremindothersofpastmisdeeds

    Don'tthrowyourtoysoutofthepramDon'thelptoomuchPassiveAggressiveDon'tcryCOIDon'tbeobnoxiousDon'tbeaWikiBigot

    Wikirelations WikiLoveWikiHateWikiCrimeWikiBullyingWikiPeaceWikiLawyeringWikiHarassmentPOVRailroading

    Essaysonnotability

    Notability

    AlternativeoutletsArticleswithasinglesourceBarenotabilityBombardmentBusinesseswithasinglelocationButit'strue!Citationoverkill

    ClonesCoatrackDiscriminatevsindiscriminateinformationEverysnowflakeisuniqueExistenceNotabilityFart

    GooglesearchesandnumbersHighSchoolsInclusionisnotanindicatorofnotabilityInherentnotabilityInsignificant

    MaskingthelackofnotabilityMakestubsNewscoveragedoesnotdecreasenotabilityNoamountofeditingcanovercomealackofnotability

    NobiglossNoonecaresaboutyourgaragebandNoonereallycaresNotability/Historical/ArgumentsNotabilitycannotbepurchased

    NotabilityisnotalevelplayingfieldNotabilityisnotamatterofopinionNotabilitymeansimpactNotabilitypointsNotabilitysubpages

    ObscurityLackofnotabilityOfflinesourcesOnehundredwordsOnesentencedoesnotanarticlemakeOtherstuffexistsPokmontest

    RunofthemillSignificantcoveragenotrequiredSolutionsaremixturesandnothingelseSubjectiveimportanceWhatnotabilityisnot

    Wikipediaisnotheretotelltheworldaboutyournoblecause

    Generalnotabilityguideline IndependentsourcesSignificantcoverageThirdpartysourcesTrivialmentions

    Humorousessays

    Humorousmaterial

    AssumebadfaithAssumegoodwraithAssumestupidityAssumethateveryone'sassuminggoodfaith,assumingthatyouareassuminggoodfaith

    Assumethegoodfaithassumptionthateveryonehastheassumptionofeveryoneassuminggoodfaith,assumingthatyouareassumingtheassumptionofgoodfaith

    AvoidusingpreviewbuttonAvoidusingwikilinksBOLD,revert,revert,revertBostonTeaPartyBarnstaritisDon'tgiveafuckismEditsPerDay

    Goahead,vandalizeLamesteditwarsNewcomersaredelicious,sogoaheadandbitethemNoclimbingtheReichstagdressedasSpiderMan

    Pleasebeagiantdick,sowecanbanyouPleasebitethenewbiesRespectHowmanyWikipediansdoesittaketochangealightbulb?

    ThefirstruleofWikipediaTheFivePillarsofUntruthWatchlistitisWhynotcreateanAccount?

    Inactivehistoricalreferences

    BadJokesandOtherDeletedUnblockEmails

    Aboutessays

    AboutessaysValueofessaysDifferencebetweenpolicies,guidelinesandessaysEssaysarenotpolicyDon'tciteessaysasiftheywerepolicyAvoidwritingredundantessays

    FindinganessayQuoteyourownessay

    Relatedsubjects AboutpoliciesandguidelinesPoliciesGuidelines

    Retrievedfrom"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing&oldid=651269946"

    Categories: Wikipediasupplementalessays

    Thispagewaslastmodifiedon14March2015,at00:36.TextisavailableundertheCreativeCommonsAttributionShareAlikeLicenseadditionaltermsmayapply.Byusingthissite,youagreetotheTermsofUseandPrivacyPolicy.WikipediaisaregisteredtrademarkoftheWikimediaFoundation,Inc.,anonprofitorganization.