Upload
trananh
View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What is Environmental Economics?
• Economics is the study of the allocation of scarce
resources.
• This helps us understand how much money society
should spend on environmental quality and how
environmental policies should be structured.
• Why not have zero pollution?
• Specifically, economics helps us to understand:
• The value of pollution abatement.
• The costs of pollution abatement.
• The welfare effects of different policies to control pollution.
Variation in Global Surface Temperatures
0.8
0.4
0.0
-0.4
-0.81860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
Year
Dep
artu
res i
n te
mpe
ratu
re (o
C) f
rom
the
1961
_ 1990
ave
rage
Data from thermometers.
Global
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.
Expected impact on global climate
• Change in global surface
temperature• Change in global mean sea
level
Source: Hadley Centre (UK) Model 3 – A1F1
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.12000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
Year
5.55.04.54.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.50.0
-0.5 1900 1950 2000 2050
Tem
pera
ture
cha
nge
(o C)
YearSe
a-le
vel r
ise
(m)
SRES A1F1
SRES A2
SRES B2
B2
A2
A1F1
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.
Expected impact on U.S. climate
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120
Year
Average Daily Mean Temperature (Annual)
Poly. (Average Daily Mean Temperature (Annual))
Source: Author’s Calculations From National Center for Atmospheric Research,
Community Climate System Model (CCSM) 3 A2
Distribution of Annual Daily Mean Temperatures (F), 1968-2002
0
10
20
30
40
<0 0-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-70 70-75 75-80 80-85 85-90 >90
Daily Mean Temperatures
Days Per Year
Note: Population-weighted average over all counties
Changes in Distribution of Daily Temperatures Under
Hadley 3 A1FI and CCSM 3, A2
<0 0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
>90
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
CCSM 3, A2 ScenarioHadley 3, A1F1 Scenario
Change in Distribution of Annual Daily Mean Temperatures (F)
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.
Estimated Response Function Between Daily Temperature and
Mortality: Females
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
<0 0-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-70 70-75 75-80 80-85 85-90 >90
Impact of a Day in 20 Daily Mean Temperature (F) Bins on Annual Female Mortality Rate,
Relative to a Day in the 65° - 70° F Bin
Annual Deaths Per 100,000 Poly. (Annual Deaths Per 100,000)
Note: Population-weighted sum of age-specific response functions
Predicted change in annual female and male
mortality
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
<0 0-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-70 70-75 75-80 80-85 85-90 >90
Daily Mean Temperature (F)
Change in Annual Male Mortality Change in Annual Female Mortality
Estimated Response Function Between Daily Temperature and Residential
Energy Consumption
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
<0 0-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-70 70-75 75-80 80-85 85-90 >90
Impact of a Day in 20 Daily Mean Temperature (F) Bins on Annual Residential Energy Consumption,
Relative to a Day in the 65° - 70° F Bin
Quadrillions of BTUs Poly. (Quadrillions of BTUs)
Predicted change in annual residential energy consumption
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
<0 0-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-70 70-75 75-80 80-85 85-90 >90
Daily Mean Temperature (F)
Quad BTU
Results from India (Preliminary)
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
-0.01
-0.02
-0.03
Log
annu
al m
orta
lity
rate
per
100
0
Estimated Mortality Impact of a Day in 20 Temperature (C) Bins onLog Annual Mortality Rate, Relative to a Day in the 20o - 24oC Bin
-1 std
+1 std
log-linear model
<0 0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10-12
12-14
14-16
16-18
18-20
20-22
22-24
24-26
26-28
28-30
30-32
32-34
34-36
36>
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.
Carbon Emissions Projections
BAU70
60
50
40
30
20
10
02005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
66
28
20
Technical measures<€90 per tCO2e
Technical measures€80-€100 per tCO2e1
(high-level estimates)Behavior changes(high-level estimates)
Emissions Abatement Pathway
Glo
bal G
HG
em
issi
ons G
tCO
2e p
er y
ear
Peak at 550 ppm, long term stabilization 550 ppm, expected 3oC increasePeak at 510 ppm, long term stabilization 450 ppm, expected 2oC increasePeak at 480 ppm, long term stabilization 400 ppm, expected 1.8oC increase
-38
-4-4
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.
Abatement Cost Curves (McKinsey)
0
-30
-60
-90
-120
-230
30
60
90
3.23.02.82.62.42.22.01.81.61.41.21.00.80.40.20
CostReal 2005 dollars per ton CO2e
Residentialelectrons
Residentialbuildings-Lighting
Fuel economy packages - Light trucks
Commercial buildingscombinedheat and power
Industrial processimprovements
Residentialwater heaters
Coal mining - Methane mgmt
Commercial buildings - Control systems
Residentialbuildings - Shell retrofits
Nuclear newbuild
Active forest management
Distributed solar PV
Coal power plants-ccs rebuilds with EOR
Afforestation of cropland
Commercial buildings - HVACequipmentefficiency
Solar CSP
Residentialbuildings - HVACequipmentefficiency
Commercial electronics
Commercial buildings - LED lighting
Fuel economy packages - Cars
Commercial buildings - CFL lighting
Commercial buildings - New shellimprovements
Residentialbuildings - New shellimprovements
Cellulosicbiofuels
Conservationtilage
Existing power plant conversionefficiencyimprovements
Industry - Combinedheat and power
Manufacturing - HFCs mgmt
Onshore wind - Low penetration
Natural gas and petroleul systemsmanagement
Afforestation of pastureland
Reforestation
Winter cover crops
Onshore wind - Mediumpenetration
Coal power plants - CCSnew builds with EOR
Biomass power - Confining
Onshore wind -High penetration
Coal powerplants - CCSnew builds
Coal powerplants - CCSrebuilds
Industry - CCS newbuilds on carbon-intensiveprocesses
Coal-to-gasshift - dispatch ofexisting plants
Car hybridization
Potential Gigatons/year
U.S. MID-RANGE ABATEMENT CURVE - 2030U.S. MID-RANGE ABATEMENT CURVE - 2030
Abatement cost <$50/ton
0.6
Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.
The Economics of Climate Change
• What costs of climate change?
• What forms of costs?
• How should we value environmental amenities?
• What costs of greenhouse gas emission abatement?
• How do we abate emissions? Fuel switching, changes in demand patterns, energy efficiency, sequestration
• Present-future tradeoffs:
• What discount rate to use?
• Irreversibility/option value
• How to design policy?
• Taxes? Trading? R&D subsidies? Clean Development Mechanism offsets?
• Equity
• How to decide which policy option?
Syllabus
Course Modules:
1. Social Choice and the Role of Government
2. Economic Efficiency and Benefit-Cost Analysis
3. Externalities and Public Goods
4. Optimal Regulation of Pollution
5. Risk and Uncertainty
6. International Trade
7. Environment, Growth, and Development
8. Measuring Benefits
9. Natural Resource Economics
10. Policy Application: Airborne Particulates
11. Policy Application: Climate Change
12. Policy Application: Energy Efficiency
How I Teach
• Name cards
• Interactive
• Class participation matters
• Goal: prepare you to think about environmental
economics in:
• Econ PhD programs
• Consulting or industry jobs
• Policy analysis/think tank jobs
• Government
• Tools:
• Theory
• Stata
Innovating
• Teaching this class very differently this year
• Different learning modes:• In-class participation
• Business school cases
• Theory
• In-class simulations
• Empirical exercises in problem sets
• New class modules:• Energy efficiency
• Climate change policy
• Theory of natural resource extraction
• Environmental issues in developing countries
• Pursue feedback throughout the semester
Questions for the Class
• Background
• Why interested in environmental economics?
• What environmental problems most of interest?
• Background on me.
Big Questions
• Why did the environmental movement take off in the 1960s?
• Is it really possible to create a market for pollution? How well do these markets work?
• Are pollution taxes better or worse than cap-and-trade programs?
• Is there a “race to the bottom” in environmental regulation?
• How does international trade affect the environment?
• What is the relationship between economic development and environmental quality?
• Are poor countries “under-polluted,” as Pritchett/Summers have claimed?
Big Questions
• Are we running out of resources?
• What does “sustainability” mean in economic terms?
• How do you measure the value of a polar bear?
• Is there an Energy Efficiency Gap?
• Get ready to answer these questions on Thursday
MIT OpenCourseWarehttp://ocw.mit.edu
14.42 / 14.420 Environmental Policy and Economics
Spring 2011
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.