Upload
kim
View
33
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
V. WHOSE WATER IS THIS? Challenges of participatory water management in Brazil: the case of Cantareira. The Piracicaba, Capivari, Jundiai Watershed Committee and the water permit renewal process of the Cantareira System. Fabiana Barbi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
VVWHOSE WATER IS THIS?
Challenges of participatory water management in Brazil: the case of Cantareira.
Fabiana BarbiMaster’s student at PROCAM – USP (University of Sao Paulo)
The Piracicaba, Capivari, Jundiai Watershed Committeeand the water permit renewal process of the Cantareira System.
Presentation ContentPresentation Content
1. Research context1. Research context
2. Research question2. Research question
3. Theoretical Approach3. Theoretical Approach
4. Research Directions4. Research Directions
5. Methodological Approach5. Methodological Approach
6. Conclusions6. Conclusions
Water Resources Management Units in SPWater Resources Management Units in SP
Piracicaba, Capivari, Jundiai WatershedPiracicaba, Capivari, Jundiai Watershed
The Region at a glanceThe Region at a glance
Second industrial pole in the countrySecond industrial pole in the country
Responsible for 7% of Gross Internal Responsible for 7% of Gross Internal ProductProduct
Around 5 million people in Around 5 million people in 15.320 km2 15.320 km2
74 municipalities (69 in SP74 municipalities (69 in SP and 5 in MG)and 5 in MG)
EnvironmentEnvironment Civil society began to worry about the Civil society began to worry about the
environment in this region in the 60’s, environment in this region in the 60’s, motivated by the fish kill due to river motivated by the fish kill due to river pollution.pollution.
This mobilization got stronger in the This mobilization got stronger in the 70’s with intense river pollution due to 70’s with intense river pollution due to industrial and demographical industrial and demographical development and the water diversion development and the water diversion to SP through the Cantareira System.to SP through the Cantareira System.
All this led to the creation of the All this led to the creation of the Consortium in 1989.Consortium in 1989.
Cantareira System - SPCantareira System - SP
Cantareira System - SP
The system was built in 1973 and is comprised of 07 dams, 07 water diversions and 48 km of tunnels and canals which allow, after the treatment at ETA Guaraú, the
distribution of 31 m3/s of water in the SP Metropolitan Region according to the water permit from 1974.
CAIEIRAS
MAIRIPORÃ
GUARULHOSARUJÁ
SUZANO
SÃO PAULO
V.G.PAUL.
ITAPEVÍ
COTIAEMBU
JANDIRA
S.B.DOCAMPO
S.LOURENÇO. DA SERRA
ITAP. DASERRA
Juquitiba
T.DASERRA
S.C.DO SUL
STO.ANDRÉ MAUÁ
R.PIRESR.G.SERRA
F.VAS.
POÁ
S. doParnaíba
SUZANO
Mogi das Cruzes
ITAQUA
OSASCO
P. B. JesusARUJÁ
F. DA ROCHA
Guararema
BiritibaMirim
Salesópolis
F. MORATO
CAIEIRAS
CARAP.
GUARULHOS
EMBUGUAÇU
DIADEMA.
São PauloOsasco
Carap.
Cotia
R.da Graça
Embu
Itap. DaSerra
EmbuGuaçu
S.Lourenço da Serra
ItapevíJandira
BARUERÍ
R.GuaraPiranga
R.Jundiaí
R.Biritiba Mirim
R.Paraitinga
R.P. NovaR. R. do
Campo
R.Billings
S.B.doCampo
DiademaSto.André
T. daSerra
R.P.Beicht
V.G. Paul.
Cajamar
MairiporãSta. Isabel
R.JuqueríF. da Rocha
F. Morato
Caieiras
Guarulhos
S.C.doSul
Mauá
R.Pires
R.G. Serra
F.Vas.
Poá
Suzano
Itaqua
Arujá
R.Taiaçupeba
R. Águas Claras
BARUERÍ
Sistema Cantareira
SistemaAlto Cotia
SistemaBaixo Cotia
SistemaGuarapiranga
Sistema Rio Claro
Sistema Alto Tietê
Sistema Rio Grande
49%
6%
1,3%
15%20%
1,7%
0,2%
Rib Estiva
Sistema Ribeirão
da Estiva
7%
Importância Relativa dos Sistemas Produtores
Reservoirs ImportanceReservoirs Importance
Research questionResearch question Facing the decentralization process in the Facing the decentralization process in the
water management and the possibility of water management and the possibility of different actors taking part in this process, different actors taking part in this process, the interest conciliation, cooperation capacity the interest conciliation, cooperation capacity among actors and conflict negotiation are among actors and conflict negotiation are necessary.necessary.
?? How the cooperation history among the ?? How the cooperation history among the PCJ Committee members contributed to PCJ Committee members contributed to strengthen its negotiation capacity in the strengthen its negotiation capacity in the
water permit renewal process of the water permit renewal process of the Cantareira System?Cantareira System?
Important ChangesImportant Changes
Water Management State System from 1991, Water Management State System from 1991, based in the French model.based in the French model. DecentralizedDecentralized SharedShared ParticipativeParticipative
Creation of the Watershed Committees.Creation of the Watershed Committees. Define strategies and projects on the watershed.Define strategies and projects on the watershed.
PCJ Committee was the first one in 1993.PCJ Committee was the first one in 1993.
PCJ Committee Structure
DirectoryDirectory
President; Vice-President; Executive Secretary
Technical Chamber of Planning (Plenary Members)
Civil SocietyCivil Society17 organizations
17 Votes
MunicipalitiesMunicipalities69 Mayors17 Votes
StateState17 Entities17 Votes
CT-PBCT-PB
Watershed Plan
CT-OLCT-OL
Permits and
licenses
CT-RNCT-RN
Natural resources conservati
on and protection
CT-SACT-SA
saniting
CT-ASCT-AS
Underground water
CT-IDCT-ID
Technology and research
difusion
CT-MHCT-MH
Hydrological monitoring
CT-SAMCT-SAM
Environmental
health
GA-Plano
GA-Rel. Sit.
CT-EACT-EA
Environmental
education
CT-RuralCT-Rural
Water use and
conservation in rural areasGT
CANTAREIRA
Water permit renewal processWater permit renewal process
Many actors involved Many actors involved with different with different interests.interests.
Negotiation lasted Negotiation lasted one and a half year.one and a half year.
The Cantareira PermitNow and Then
.
1974 – centralized 1974 – centralized decisiondecision
30 years permit30 years permit
Water priority to Sao Water priority to Sao Paulo M A (31 from 33 Paulo M A (31 from 33 mm33/s)/s)
Centralized Centralized management by management by SabespSabesp
2004 – participative 2004 – participative processprocess
10 years permit10 years permit
Gradual change in Gradual change in water priority (water bank, water priority (water bank, 6 m6 m33/s to PCJ)/s to PCJ)
Participatory Participatory managementmanagement
Research DirectionResearch DirectionThere is a satisfatory stock of There is a satisfatory stock of cooperation,cooperation, trust,trust, solidarity andsolidarity and reciprocity among the members in this reciprocity among the members in this
Committe Committe
so that they can build so that they can build institutional institutional arrangementsarrangements, adopting , adopting coordinated coordinated strategies strategies to negotiate solutions to to negotiate solutions to shared management problems, for shared management problems, for instance, in the case of the water permit instance, in the case of the water permit renewal.renewal.
Theoretical ApproachTheoretical Approach
““Much of the world is dependent on resources that are Much of the world is dependent on resources that are subject to the possibility of a tragedy of the commons.” subject to the possibility of a tragedy of the commons.” (E. Ostrom)(E. Ostrom)
““A group in an interdependence situation can organize A group in an interdependence situation can organize and govern in order to obtain joint continuous benefits and govern in order to obtain joint continuous benefits when they adopt coordinated strategies.” (E. Ostrom)when they adopt coordinated strategies.” (E. Ostrom)
Social capitalSocial capitalThe capacity that a group has to develop trust ties and The capacity that a group has to develop trust ties and cooperation networks in order to produce collective cooperation networks in order to produce collective goods.goods.
Methodological ApproachMethodological Approach
Cognitive social capital: trust, Cognitive social capital: trust, solidarity, reciprocity and solidarity, reciprocity and cooperation.cooperation.
Structural social capital: social Structural social capital: social networks.networks.
Coordinated strategies lead to Coordinated strategies lead to collective action – decision making, collective action – decision making, participation, resources mobilization participation, resources mobilization and management, communication and management, communication and conflict resolution.and conflict resolution.
ConclusionsConclusions
o The Cantareira system water use permit The Cantareira system water use permit renewal process opened important channels renewal process opened important channels of participation, allowing the Universities to of participation, allowing the Universities to play an important role.play an important role.
o The negotiation process strengthened the The negotiation process strengthened the Committee as a water management Committee as a water management organization and the water management organization and the water management system as a whole.system as a whole.
o It raised awareness in how people reflect on It raised awareness in how people reflect on the natural resources depletion.the natural resources depletion.
ReferencesReferences
Projeto Marca d’Agua: Projeto Marca d’Agua: wwwwww..marcadaguamarcadagua.org..org.brbr ANA: ANA: wwwwww..anaana.gov..gov.brbr CBH-PCJ: CBH-PCJ: wwwwww..comitepcjcomitepcj..spsp.gov..gov.brbr CONSORCIO: CONSORCIO: wwwwww..aguaagua.org..org.brbr DAEE: DAEE: www.daee.sp.gov.brwww.daee.sp.gov.br
Contact: Contact: [email protected]@terra.com.br