1
Shifted? A Public-Service Announcement About Tidal Datums Luke J H Hunt, Michael J O’Donnell, Luke P Miller and Mark W Denny Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University What is MLLW anyway? •On the West-Coast of North America (and many other locations) we have mixed, semi-diurnal tides with high-low and low-high tides. •Measuring the level of the lower of the low tides each day gives the data to calculate Mean Lower Low Water. •Actual height of tide at a location is driven by several factors, including daily rotation of the Earth, monthly periods of the moon, annual location of the sun, and such longer term factors as the 18.6 year precession of lunar nodes. Local topography is also very important. Tides in M onterey -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 09/30/03 10/02/03 10/04/03 10/06/03 10/08/03 10/10/03 D ate T id alH eig h t (R elative to M LLW 1960-1978 epoch) MLLW of these data Which Datum Do We Use? •The choice of datum is arbitrary, and there are several in general usage. •Usually, the primary concern is to prevent ships from running aground; some datums are more conservative, others will have many days when water is shallower than listed on chart. A conservative datum is used for charting. •In the USA, charts are relative to MLLW. •Many countries use Lowest Astronomical Tide as datum. LAT is the lowest predicted tide level in an interval, and is lower than MLLW. •Calder, N. (2003). How To Read a Nautical Chart . International Marine, Camden, ME. •Hicks, S. D., H. A. Debaugh Jr., L. E. Hickman Jr. (1983) Sea Level Variations for the United States 1855-1980 . NOAA Rockville, MD. •Scott Duncan from NOAA provided immense help accessing NOAA records. •http://www.merriamwebster.com/ Summary •Approximately every 20 years, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration recalculates the MLLW tidal datum that forms the basis for water depth measurement on nautical charts and is used as a reference for many studies in the intertidal zone. •The most recent adjustment was released in 2003, based on measurements from 1984-2001. •Tidal datums may have shifted by several centimeters since the last adjustment. •Scientists attempting to compare between sites or to re- acquire sites need to be aware that this adjustment may affect their results. Does this Matter To Me? •A shift in tidal datum may affect certain comparisons of data that span tidal epochs. For instance, if field sites are located relative to a zero MLLW tide mark, pre- and post 2003 sites may actually be at different absolute heights. •Anyone attempting to re-acquire historical sites that are described by their surveyed tidal heights should be aware that these heights may reference an older datum. Why Do Datums Change? •Rising sea levels shift MLLW up relative to fixed Earth points. •Tectonic uplift locally shifts the earth up relative to sea level, so MLLW shifts down relative to the rising benchmarks. •NOAA monitors tide stations for 19 years to take long-term periodic factors into account and releases updated datums based on 19 year data about every 20-25 years. •Magnitude of the shift will vary between locations. Where to Find More Information •NOAA website will have corrections for nearest tide gauge http://co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/data_res.html •This poster available at the Denny Lab Website http://www.stanford.edu/group/denny M onthly M LLW C om pared to M LLW Datum s forS an Francisco,C A 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 1 / 0/ 1 9 00 1 / 1 / 1 9 1 0 1 / 3 / 1 9 2 0 1 / 4 / 1 9 3 0 1 / 6 / 1 9 4 0 1 / 7 / 1 9 5 0 1 / 9 / 1 9 6 0 1 / 1 0/ 1 9 7 0 1 / 1 2 / 1 9 8 0 1 / 1 3 / 1 9 9 0 1 / 1 5 / 2 000 Elevation above B enchm ark (m ) NTDE 1924-1942 NTDE 1898-1916 NTDE 1941-1959 NTDE 1983-2001 NTDE 1960-1978 1900 1980 1970 196 1950 1940 1930 1920 1910 2000 1990 Monthly MLLW San Francisco MLLW Datum Monthly MLLW can differ from the MLLW datum by as much as 0.5m. The most important factors that contribute to this variability in monthly MLLW are: seasonal pressure and sea surface temperature fluctuations, El Nino, and the 18.6-year fluctuation in tidal amplitudes driven by the inclination of the moon’s orbit. When computing the MLLW datum, the period of 19 years is chosen to average out the seasonal and 18.6-year periodicities, thus the elevation of the datum is most influenced by changes in El Nino frequency, sea level rise, and local tectonic activity. Strong El Nino years of 1957-58, 1983, and 1997 are clearly visible in the monthly MLLW record. The most recent increase in the MLLW datum is particularly large, because both the 1983 and 1997 El Ninos occurred during the most current tidal epoch (NTDE 1983-2001) and temporarily increased the sea surface The Elevation Change Between Datums is Site- Specific MLLW Change May Differ from MSL Change 6.3 4.3 3.6 7.4 6.4 0.9 1.2 4.6 -3.2 -3.9 3.1 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 San Diego Los Angeles Santa Barbara Monterey San Francisco Crescent City Coos Bay Depoe Bay Astoria Neah Bay Friday Harbor Difference between Datums (cm) MLLW Change (with value) MSL Change A positive difference indicates an increase in the datum elevation relative to the station benchmark. The difference is calculated between the most recent tidal datums (NTDE 1983-2001 and NTDE 1960- 1978). Data are compiled from station benchmark data sheets available from http://co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/data_res.html. References Field Site established at MLLW during 1941 – 1959 epoch (anytime during most of the 1960’s and 1970’s) MLLW during 1960-1978 epoch (1980’s through 2003) .6 cm higher New MLLW for 1983-2001 epoch 7.4 cm higher I Thought the Plural of ”Datum” was ”Data”, What Gives? We’re glad you asked. There are two slightly different senses of the word (from Merriam-Webster Dictionary) 1 plural da·ta : something given or admitted especially as a basis for reasoning or inference is the one you are remembering 2 plural datums : something used as a basis for calculating or measuring is what we are discussing

What is MLLW anyway?

  • Upload
    milek

  • View
    43

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Elevation Change Between Datums is Site-Specific MLLW Change May Differ from MSL Change. MLLW of these data. 3.1. Friday Harbor. -3.9. Neah Bay. -3.2. Astoria. 4.6. Depoe Bay. 1.2. Coos Bay. 0.9. Crescent City. 6.4. San Francisco. 7.4. Monterey. 3.6. Santa Barbara. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: What is MLLW anyway?

Has Your Baseline Shifted?A Public-Service Announcement About Tidal Datums

Luke J H Hunt, Michael J O’Donnell, Luke P Miller and Mark W DennyHopkins Marine Station of Stanford University

What is MLLW anyway?

•On the West-Coast of North America (and many other locations) we have mixed, semi-diurnal tides with high-low and low-high tides.

•Measuring the level of the lower of the low tides each day gives the data to calculate Mean Lower Low Water.

•Actual height of tide at a location is driven by several factors, including daily rotation of the Earth, monthly periods of the moon, annual location of the sun, and such longer term factors as the 18.6 year precession of lunar nodes. Local topography is also very important.

Tides in Monterey

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

09/30/03 10/02/03 10/04/03 10/06/03 10/08/03 10/10/03

Date

Tid

al

He

igh

t (R

ela

tiv

e t

o M

LL

W 1

96

0-1

97

8 e

po

ch

)

MLLW of these data

Which Datum Do We Use?

•The choice of datum is arbitrary, and there are several in general usage.

•Usually, the primary concern is to prevent ships from running aground; some datums are more conservative, others will have many days when water is shallower than listed on chart. A conservative datum is used for charting.

•In the USA, charts are relative to MLLW.

•Many countries use Lowest Astronomical Tide as datum. LAT is the lowest predicted tide level in an interval, and is lower than MLLW.

•Calder, N. (2003). How To Read a Nautical Chart. International Marine, Camden, ME.

•Hicks, S. D., H. A. Debaugh Jr., L. E. Hickman Jr. (1983) Sea Level Variations for the United States 1855-1980. NOAA Rockville, MD.

•Scott Duncan from NOAA provided immense help accessing NOAA records.

•http://www.merriamwebster.com/

Summary

•Approximately every 20 years, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration recalculates the MLLW tidal datum that forms the basis for water depth measurement on nautical charts and is used as a reference for many studies in the intertidal zone.

•The most recent adjustment was released in 2003, based on measurements from 1984-2001.

•Tidal datums may have shifted by several centimeters since the last adjustment.

•Scientists attempting to compare between sites or to re-acquire sites need to be aware that this adjustment may affect their results.

Does this Matter To Me?

•A shift in tidal datum may affect certain comparisons of data that span tidal epochs. For instance, if field sites are located relative to a zero MLLW tide mark, pre- and post 2003 sites may actually be at different absolute heights.

•Anyone attempting to re-acquire historical sites that are described by their surveyed tidal heights should be aware that these heights may reference an older datum.

Why Do Datums Change?

•Rising sea levels shift MLLW up relative to fixed Earth points.

•Tectonic uplift locally shifts the earth up relative to sea level, so MLLW shifts down relative to the rising benchmarks.

•NOAA monitors tide stations for 19 years to take long-term periodic factors into account and releases updated datums based on 19 year data about every 20-25 years.

•Magnitude of the shift will vary between locations.

Where to Find More Information

•NOAA website will have corrections for nearest tide gauge

http://co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/data_res.html

•This poster available at the Denny Lab Website

http://www.stanford.edu/group/denny

Monthly MLLW Compared to MLLW Datums for San Francisco, CA

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

2

2.1

2.2

2.3

1 /0 /1 9 0 0 1 /1 /1 9 1 0 1 /3 /1 9 2 0 1 /4 /1 9 3 0 1 /6 /1 9 4 0 1 /7 /1 9 5 0 1 /9 /1 9 6 0 1 /1 0 /1 9 7 0 1 /1 2 /1 9 8 0 1 /1 3 /1 9 9 0 1 /1 5 /2 0 0 0

Ele

vati

on

ab

ove

Ben

chm

ark

(m)

NTDE 1924-1942NTDE 1898-1916

NTDE 1941-1959 NTDE 1983-2001NTDE 1960-1978

1900 1980197019619501940193019201910 20001990

Monthly MLLWSan Francisco MLLW Datum

Monthly MLLW can differ from the MLLW datum by as much as 0.5m. The most important factors that contribute to this variability in monthly MLLW are: seasonal pressure and sea surface temperature fluctuations, El Nino, and the 18.6-year fluctuation in tidal amplitudes driven by the inclination of the moon’s orbit. When computing the MLLW datum, the period of 19 years is chosen to average out the seasonal and 18.6-year periodicities, thus the elevation of the datum is most influenced by changes in El Nino frequency, sea level rise, and local tectonic activity. Strong El Nino years of 1957-58, 1983, and 1997 are clearly visible in the monthly MLLW record. The most recent increase in the MLLW datum is particularly large, because both the 1983 and 1997 El Ninos occurred during the most current tidal epoch (NTDE 1983-2001) and temporarily increased the sea surface elevation during those years. Data are compiled from Hicks et al 1983 and monthly mean data available at http://co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/data_res.html.

The Elevation Change Between Datums is Site-Specific MLLW Change May Differ from MSL Change

6.3

4.3

3.6

7.4

6.4

0.9

1.2

4.6

-3.2

-3.9

3.1

-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8

San Diego

Los Angeles

Santa Barbara

Monterey

San Francisco

Crescent City

Coos Bay

Depoe Bay

Astoria

Neah Bay

Friday Harbor

Difference between Datums (cm)

MLLW Change(with value)

MSL Change

A positive difference indicates an increase in the datum elevation relative to the station benchmark. The difference is calculated between the most recent tidal datums (NTDE 1983-

2001 and NTDE 1960-1978). Data are compiled from station benchmark data sheets available from http://co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/data_res.html.

References

Field Site established at MLLW during 1941 – 1959 epoch

(anytime during most of the 1960’s and 1970’s)

MLLW during 1960-1978 epoch(1980’s through 2003)

.6 cm higher

New MLLW for 1983-2001 epoch7.4 cm higher

I Thought the Plural of ”Datum” was ”Data”, What Gives?

We’re glad you asked. There are two slightly different senses of the word (from Merriam-Webster Dictionary)

1 plural da·ta : something given or admitted especially as a basis for reasoning or inference is the one you are remembering2 plural datums : something used as a basis for calculating or measuring is what we are discussing