Upload
phamkhanh
View
220
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What are the latest trends in executive benefits?Executive benefits survey results
DECEMBER 6, 2011 MALINDA RILEY and KURT FICHTHORN
2© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Executive benefits landscape
The executive benefits landscape has changed over
the past several years for several reasons:
Struggling national and global economies
Declining share prices
Expanded proxy disclosures
Intense public focus on executive benefits
3© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Executive benefits challenge
How can organizations best attract and retain
executives in this environment?
Organizations, both not for profit and for profit, must focus
on the level and composition of executive benefit
programs.
Organizations must also balance market-competitive
considerations with shareholder and/or public interests.
4© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Survey objective
Survey objective: obtain current data on the
prevalence of practice regarding executive retirement,
deferred compensation and perquisites for employers
of all sizes and across a broad group of industries
317 respondents from 8 industry classifications
Revenues ranging from <$50M to >$20B
5© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Survey participants by industry
Industrial, 27%
Services, 22%
Health Care7%
Consumer Goods, 16%
Financial, 19%
2011 Executive Benefit SurveySurvey Partipants by Industry
317 total participants
6© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Survey participants by revenue
<$50 Million, 16%
$50M - $99M, 4%
$100M - 249M, 11%
$250M - $499M, 10%
$500M - $999M, 9%
$1 Billion - $2.49B, 17%
$2.50 B - $5B, 11%
$5B - $9.9B, 7%
$10B -$19.9B, 5%
$20B or greater, 8%
2011 Executive Benefit SurveySurvey Partipants by Revenue
317 total participants
7© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Executive retirement
Definitions
Executive Retirement Plan Definitions
Nonqualified Retirement Plan
Supplemental executive retirement plans (SERP), such as top-hat plans or excess plans, which provide certain employees with additional retirement benefits. These plans may be free-standing plans that cover several executives or they may be part of individual executive employment contracts.
Nonqualified Defined Benefit Plan
Retirement plan that provides a fixed benefit at retirement based on a formula or target income percentage. The plan is not qualified under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and is usually in addition to a qualified defined benefit plan. This type of plan is designed to supplement defined benefit pensions and/or restore benefits in pension plans that are limited by ERISA.
Nonqualified Defined Contribution Plan
Retirement plan in which employers make fixed contributions toward retirement. The plan is not qualified under the IRC and is typically in addition to qualified defined contribution plans (401(k), 403(b), etc.) This type of plan is designed to supplement defined contribution plans and/or restore benefits that are limited by ERISA.
8© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Executive retirement
In aggregate, nearly half of the participating organizations provide some
type of nonqualified retirement plan, either defined benefit or defined
contribution
59%
50% 47% 45%
32%
20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Industrial Consumer Goods
Health Care Financial Tax Exempt Services
Pe
rce
nt
Industry
Executive Retirement Plan Prevalence by Industry
9© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Executive retirement
The market is evenly split between defined benefit and defined
contribution programs; however, new programs are typically defined
contribution
Executive Retirement Offered President &
CEO
Executive
and Senior
VPs
VPs Division
Heads
Based on
Compensation
Nonqualified Retirement Plan 49% 66% 57% 42% 17% 32%
Defined Benefit 32% 74% 69% 49% 26% 35%
Defined Contribution 31% 73% 72% 60% 37% 39%
10© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Executive retirement
Organizations most often use nonqualified retirement programs to make
up for IRS limits:
Executive Retirement
Plan
Objective
President
& CEO
Executive and
Senior VPs VPs
Division
Heads
Based on
Compensation
Make up for IRS Limits 74% 77% 71% 55% 32% 38%
Bring retirement income to a target
level 33% 87% 71% 44% 23% 15%
Include deferred compensation 32% 90% 80% 72% 38% 30%
Provide "golden handcuffs" to retain
executives 32% 82% 80% 45% 22% 16%
Recruit mid-career executives 26% 73% 78% 59% 32% 24%
Improve early retirement benefits 12% 79% 74% 47% 26% 26%
Include bonuses not covered in
qualified plans 12% 79% 63% 42% 16% 21%
Provide benefits for executives with
insufficient service 8% 75% 67% 42% 17% 17%
Provide retirement benefits to
executives with no qualifed plan 8% 77% 85% 31% 8% 8%
Maintain benefits from executive's
prior employer 6% 78% 67% 33% 22% 33%
"Keep whole" executive transferring
from subsidiaries or other countries 3% 75% 75% 50% 50% 25%
11© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Executive retirement
Base and short-term Incentives are most typically included in the
definition of compensation in nonqualified retirement plans.
Elements of Pay Included
Base Salary 92%
Annual Incentives 75%
Long-term Incentives 18%
Deferred Compensation 41%
12© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Executive retirement
Other elements of nonqualified retirement plans
include the following:
Funding – 52% of respondents informally fund their nonqualified
retirement programs
Rabbi trust is the most prevalent in the general market
Vesting – Only 16% have immediate vesting, while 40% have service
based cliff vesting, 20% have age based cliff vesting and 17% have
graded vesting
Some organizations base the benefit on personal performance,
ranging from 8% to 14% depending on executive level
13© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Deferred compensation
Deferred compensation arrangements are prevalent in the market (53%)
Two thirds of organizations do NOT match deferrals, while the remaining one third does:
Most prevalent match is the same formula as 401(k) plan (35%)
The definition of compensation under deferred compensation programs is as follows:
Type of compensation Included
Base salary 89%
Annual Incentive 79%
Long-term Incentive (cash or stock) 34%
Restricted Stock 7%
14© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Deferred compensation
Provisions regarding payment triggers and options do not vary
significantly based on industry:
A lump sum payment option is the most prevalent (94%), with fixed annual installments
the second most prevalent (62%)
Payment trigger All
Separation of service 90%
Change in control 48%
Death 84%
Disability 70%
Hardship 43%
Specified period of time 45%
15© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Deferred compensation
Funding of deferred compensation programs is
slightly higher than funding for nonqualified
retirement programs
54% of all surveyed organizations informally fund their deferred
compensation programs
69% of those that fund their NQDC use a Rabbi Trust
30% use Life Insurance as a funding method
Participation in NQDC programs is as follows:
The average participation rate among all surveyed organizations is
39%
16© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Perquisites
Perquisites continue to be part of a executive compensation packages;
however, the level and mix demonstrates the impact of regulation and
public scrutiny
Executive Perquisites Offered President &
CEO
Executive and
Senior VPs VPs Division Heads
Based on
Compensation
Cellular Phones 79% 94% 87% 83% 67% 9%
Exec Severance Pay Practice 51% 87% 80% 58% 29% 8%
Employment Contracts 48% 19% 55% 23% 13% 8%
Exec Physical Exams 43% 96% 85% 55% 20% 4%
Golden Parachutes 42% 92% 83% 31% 13% 7%
Exec Parking 39% 95% 83% 56% 27% 1%
Exec Group Life Insurance 37% 88% 80% 57% 22% 10%
Exec LTD 37% 84% 80% 60% 26% 22%
Car Allowance 36% 78% 71% 56% 34% 4%
Average Car Allowance Amount $11,988 $10,921 $10,376 $11,187 $7,667
Personal Financial Counseling/Tax Prep 31% 95% 82% 40% 19% 6%
Company Cars 30% 93% 57% 38% 24% 4%
17© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Perquisites
Perquisites continue to be part of executive
compensation packages; however, the level and mix
demonstrates the impact of regulation and public
scrutiny
Only 18% of organizations gross up any perquisites
provided, with car allowance the most commonly grossed
up benefit
18© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Executive benefits in the future
Organizations, regardless of industry, are not planning
to make changes to current executive benefit
programs
Organizations who may make changes are either planning
to install or reorganize executive benefits
Changes Planned? Executive
Retirement
Deferred
Compensation
Perquisites
Yes 6% 13% 10%
No 94% 87% 90%
19© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Executive benefits survey - observations
What do these survey results tell us about the current
and future state of executive benefits? Executive benefit packages have not been altered significantly as a result of the
economic recession
Organizations continue to offer a suite of benefits to executives to attract and retain
their key talent
However, proxy disclosure requirements as well as public scrutiny have caused
organizations to ask the question: Is this benefit critical to the execution of the
executive’s job duties?
Increasingly, if the answer is “No” then the benefit is eliminated
Organizations will continue to offer deferred compensation programs in order to be
competitive, although the reduced participation in these programs may be an indication
of uncertainty regarding future tax rates.
20© 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved
Questions?
Malinda Riley
312.228.1822
Kurt Fichthorn
215.861.2569