Upload
karwan-dilmany
View
241
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
1/217
WELL CONTROL LAB
Dr. Tibor Szab
1
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
2/217
Course Description
Causes of kicks, warning signs of kicks,shutting-in procedures, the risk of shallow gas,stripping operation, pressure balance in thehole, behavior of gas in the well, well controlmethods, well control equipment, BOP stackarrangements, manifolds and valves systems,
other devices, the functions and capacity ofthe accumulator unit, pressure testing of wellcontrol equipment, regulations and standards.
2
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
3/217
Assessment
Students will be assessed with using thefollowing elements.
Attendance: 5 % Homework 10 % Short quizzes 10 %
Midterm exam 40 % Final exam 35 % Total 100%
3
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
4/217
Grading
% value Grade
90 -100% 5 (excellent)
80 89% 4 (good)
70 - 79% 3 (satisfactory)
60 - 69% 2 (pass)
0 - 59% 1 (failed)
4
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
5/217
Literature
T. Bell, D. Eby, J. Larrison, B. Ranka: BlowoutPrevention, 4th Ed. ISBN 0-88698-242-1. 2009.
R. Baker: Practical Well Control, 4th Ed. ISBN 0-
88698-183-2. 1998. R. Grace: Blowout and Well Control Handbook, Gulf
Publishing Company, ISBN: 0750677082.
R. D. Grace: Advanced Blowout & Well Control, GulfPublishing Company, 1994, ISBN 0-88415-260-X.
5
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
6/217
6
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
7/217
Estimated Costs of Blowouts
Location and Event Year Cost M $
North Sea, Ekofisk Platform, Blowout 1976 56West Africa, Onshore Blowout 1978 90
North America, H2S Blowout 1982 50North America, Underground Event, Jack-Up 1985 124
S. America, Platform Blowout 1988 530North Sea, Platform Explosion and Fire 1988 1360Norvegian North Sea, Underground Blowout 1989 284Kuwait Oil Co., Al-Awda Project, Kuwait 1991 5400
Pusztaszls 34 2000 38
Csunking 233 dead, 20000 evacuationNagylengyel 282A 3000 evacuation
7
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
8/217
PRESSURE CONCEPTSPressure Fundamentals
8
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
9/217
The U-tube
MW - 10 ppgTVD - 10,000 ft
String Annulus
HP = MW x 0.052 x TVD= 10 x 0.052 x 10,000
= 5,200 psi
HP = MW x 0.052 x TVD= 10 x 0.052 x 10,000
= 5,200 psi
Two columns of fluid:One inside the pipe & one in the annulusThese two columns of fluid act to form a U-tube .If the MW in the pipe & annulus is the same then the mud level will same
9
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
10/217
Hydrostatic pressure
Primary Control Hydrostatic pressure > Formation pressure
KICK (underbalance) Hydrostatic pressure < Formation pressure
Secondary Control Hydrostatic press + SIDPP = Formation
pressure
Tertiary Control Shear/seal Ram Baryte Plug
10
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
11/217
Hydrostatic Pressure
MeasuredDepth = MD
True VerticalDepth = TVD
Static pressure of a liquid increases with density anddepth TVD
Hp = g TVD (kg/liter*0,0981 *m) = barHP = 0,052 MW TVD (lb/ft * ft) = psi
Mud gradient (MG), pressure gradient:
grad Hp = p/TVDMG = MW*0,052 (ppg*0,052) = psi/ft
MG = MW*0,0981 (kg/l*0,0981)= bar/m
11
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
12/217
Abnormal Pressure
12
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
13/217
Abnormal PressureGradients
Normal Pressure GradientsWest Texas: 0.433 psi/ft - 8.33 ppg 0,0981 bar/mGulf Coast: 0.465 psi/ft 9,0 ppg - 0,106 bar/m
Normal and Abnormal Pore Pressure
Pore Pressure, psig
D e p
t h , f
t
10,000 ? ?
Normal (IWCF):1,07 kg/l 0,105 bar/m
13
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
14/217
Overpressure Due To Density Differences
Large Structures: - large anticline, dome
Hydrostatic pressure gradient is lower in gas or oil
than in water. 14
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
15/217
Overpressure Due To Folding
15
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
16/217
Overpressure Caused By Salt Dome
16
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
17/217
Pore Pressure Development Due toUndercompaction
17
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
18/217
20. Abnormal Pressure 411. Well Drilling Slide 18 of 41
s OB = p + s Z
s ob
p s z
18
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
19/217
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
20/217
When crossing faults it is possible to go from normalpressure to abnormally high pressure in a short
interval. 20
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
21/217
Determination of Fracture Gradient
To avoid lost circulation while drilling it is importantto know the variation of fracture gradient with depth.
Formation Integrity tests represent an experimental approach to fracture gradient determination.
Below are listed and discussed three theoreticalapproaches to calculating the fracture gradient.
Formation fracture pressure can be expressed: Fracturing Pressure, bar (psi), Equivalent mud weight, kg/liter, (ppg), Fracture gradient, bar/m (psi/ft).
21
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
22/217
Fracture Gradients Determination (Theoretical )
1. Hubbert & Willis:
Where: F = Fracturing Gradient, psi/ft, P = Pore Pressure Gradient, psi/ftD = Depth, ft
D
P21
3
1F
min
D
P1
2
1F
max
2. Matthews & Kelly:
Where: Ki = Matrix Stress Coefficient , = Vertical Matrix Stress, psi,D = Depth, ft
DP
DK
F is
s
3. Ben Eaton:
Where: S = Overburden Stress, psi, = Poissons Ratio, D = Depth, ft
D
P
1*
D
PSF
Operators prefer to perform leak-off or formation-competency tests to estimatethe fracture gradient,
22
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
23/217
Formation Integrity (Practical)
Formation strength tests can be carried out to determine:
Limit Test : A test carried out to a specified value ,always below the fracture gradient of the formation. Can be carried out in any open hole or perforated
section. Low permeable formation
Leak-off Test : carried out to the point where theformation leaks off. On Wild-Cat wells at each casing shoe On development wells, recommended
Fracture Gradient Test : A test carried out to the leak offpoint and beyond until the formation is breakdown .
23
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
24/217
StableFracture
Propagation
UnstableFracture
Propagation Fracture Closure Phase,
Stop Pumping
Formation Integrity or Limit Test
Leak-Off Test (LOT)
LP
LOP
FOP
UFP
FPP
ISIP
FCP /MHS
LP = Limit PressureLOP= Leak-Off PressureFOP= Fracture Opening PressureUFP= Uncontrolled Fracture Pressure
FPP= Fracture Propagation Press.ISIP= Instantaneous Shut-In Press.FCP= Fracture Closure PressureMHS = Minimum Horizontal Stress
VOLUME
P R E
S S U R E
TIME
Typical Formation Breakdown Test
24
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
25/217
Principle of Leak-off Test (LOT)
Investigate the wellbore capability with regard to Determination of maximum mud weight MAASP for safe well control operations Setting depth of the next casing,
Collect information on formation strengths Optimisation of well planning, Hole stability,
Reservoir application, Well Control
25
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
26/217
Leak-off Test Procedure
1) Drill out shoe and 3-5 m (10 - 15 ft) of new hole
2) Circulate mud until uniform3) Pull bit inside shoe
4) Line up on high pressure low volume pump.5) Close the BOP.
26
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
27/217
Leak-off Test Procedure
1 2 3 4
6) Pump down drillpipe or annulus low rate HP pump) max 80 litre/min (1/2 bbl/min)
7) Plot the Volume vs. Pressure
8) STOP when a change in the pressure curve is noticed
9) Repeat test verify the LO point
LOP
Pressure
Volume (Strks)
Accuratepressure gauge
27
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
28/217
Leak Off Test Calculations
1 2 3 4
100200300400500600700800900100011001200
Stop Pumping
bbls
Shoe TVD = 1675 m (5495 ft)
Test Mud = 1.26 kg/l (10.5 ppg)
Hydrostatic Pressure of Test Mud tothe Shoe:
1.26 x 0.0981 x 1675 = 207 bar
10.5 x .052 x 5495 = 3000 psi
Fracture Pressure = Hydrostatic Pressure + LOP =
= 207 + 70 = 277 bar = (3000 + 1000 = 4000 psi)
Leak-off Pressure70 bar (1000 psi)
28
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
29/217
Formation Strength - Limit Test
Test Objective: Confirm pressure integrity of
formation to a pre-determinedpressure.
Limitations: Limited guidance on the integrity ofthe casing shoe.
Does not quantify propertiesassociated with fracturing stresses.
Limit test provides limited
information!
Surface Limit Press. (LP)
Volume Pumped(or time @ constant pump rate)
S u r f a c e
P r e s s u r e
29
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
30/217
Leak Off Test Low and High Permeable Formation
Leak Off Press(LOP)
Vol.
P r e
s s u r e
Initial Press
Vol.
P r e s s u r e
Final Press
High Permeable Formation Low Permeable Formation
30
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
31/217
Leak-off Test Report
31
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
32/217
Maximum Allowable Mud Weight
Maximum Allowable Mud Weight (kg/l) =
Example :Surface Leak-off Pressure = 50 bar (714 psi)
Casing Shoe Depth (TVD) = 1000 m (3048 ft)Mud Weight in Hole = 1,44 kg/liter (12 ppg)
Max. Allowable Mud Weight (kg/l)
)l/kg(HoleinMudWeight(m)TVDDepth,ShoeCasing
10.2x(bar)essurePr LeakOff
l/kg95.1)l/kg(44.1(m)1000
10.2x(bar)50
ppg5.16)ppg(120.052x(ft)3048
(psi)714
Field Unit:
Max. Allowable Mud Weight (ppg)
32
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
33/217
Maximum Allowable Annulus Surface Pressure MAASPEvery time the mud weight is changed, the MAASP changes and must be re-calculatedusing Maximum Allowable Mud Weight.
MAASP =
Example:Max. Allowable Mud Weight = 1.95 kg/l (16.5 ppg)Mud Weight in Hole = 1.44 kg/l (12 ppg)Casing Shoe Depth (TVD) = 1000 m (3048 ft)
10.2)m(TVDShoex)]l/kg(HoleinWeightMud)l/kg(WeightMud Allowable.Max[
bar 5010.2
)m(1000x)]l/kg(44.1)l/kg(95.1[MAASP
Field Unit:MAASP (bar)== (Max. Allowable MW (ppg) - MW in Hole (ppg)) x Shoe TVD (ft) x 0.052
= (16.5 12) x 3048 x 0.052 = 714 psi33
ll h l l
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
34/217
FORMATION STRENGTH DATA:
SURFACE LEAK-OFF PRESSURE FROM
FORMATION STRENGTH TEST (A) 64 bar
DRLG FLUID DENSITY AT TEST (B) 1,25 kg/l
0,1225 bar/m
MAX. ALLOWABLE DRILLING FLUID DENSITY:(A) x 10.2
(B) + SHOE T.V.DEPTH (C) 1,79 kg/l
0,1759 bar/m
INITIAL MAASP:[(C) - CURR. DENSITY] x SHOE T.V.D. =
10.2
64,00 bar
Kill Sheet CalculationMAASP
34
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
35/217
CAUSES OF KICK
35
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
36/217
Causes of Kick
Any time the formation pressure greater than BHP:
Penetration into overpressure formation Abnormal pressure Insufficient mud weight
Excessive drilling rate through gas sand
Swabbing surging
If height of mud column is allowed to drop Total mud loss Improper hole filling while tripping
36
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
37/217
Causes of Kick
Early Kick Detection Closed circulation system Flow rate IN equal flow rate OUT Constant pit level
Exception
Oil base mud gas kick may be dissolved
37
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
38/217
Kick Size
By Bill Rehm:
kick size < 3 m 3 (18 bbl) no problem ,
3 m 3 < kick size < 6 m 3 (40 bbl) good job ,
6 m 3 < kick size God help!
38
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
39/217
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
40/217
WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling
Changes in drilling rate Drilling Break High pressure shale or sand ROP increases if water base mud - rock bit - drilling
break Accepted policy : drill maximum 1 m (2-4 ft) flow check
When ROP suddenly increases indicate thepossibility of kick!
40
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
41/217
ROP As An Indicator of Overpressure
41
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
42/217
WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling
Increased return flow rate
If the well kicks - return flow rate increases Flow measurement devices - return flow indicator
If well flowing suspected- flow check Stop drilling Kelly up Stop pump Flow check
42
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
43/217
Flow check (WBM) in the case of water base mud Recommended up to 10 min If the well does not flow:
- During drilling flow check If the well flows: - Shut in the well,- Well killing operation
WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling
43
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
44/217
Flow check in OBMIn the case of oil base mud Recommended up to 20 min - absorbed gas!
If the well does not flow: Bottoms-up circulation Drilling ahead 3 m (10 ft) flow check
Bottoms-up circulation short trip
if the well flows: Shut in the well - start well killing operation
WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling
44
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
45/217
Pit gain
Positive indication - indication alarm!
Pit level indicators show and record gain/loss of mud
Information during drilling or tripping Not exact sign - mud is added or taken from pit
Quick shut-in
Rate of pit gain - indication of permeability
WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling
45
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
46/217
High permeable formation
If slightly underbalanced good kick detection
- drilling break associated
Low permeable formation
If slightly underbalanced
- difficult detect the kick
- slow flow rate, slow pit gain
- drilling break not associated
- underbalanced - only gas cut mud appear
WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling
46
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
47/217
Influx Rate =
The influx rate depending on: Driller resposibility:
Permeability of formation ( k = 200 mD ) NO ln Re/Rw = 2 NO Gas viscosity ( = 0,3 cp ) NO
Pressure difference ( P=42 bar (624 psi) YES / NO Penetration to formation ( L=6 m (20 ft)) YES Time of identification (0 min) YES Time the shut in ( 2 min ) YES
1440RR
ln
Lpk0,007q
we
Darcy Law
144020.3
6422000.007
Kick size = 6,24 m3 (40bbl)
3 m3/min
= 20 (bbl/min)
47
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
48/217
Decrease pump pressure increase pump rate gas at the annulus helps for pumping U tube
Increase in rotary torque
greater increase in transition zone large amount of cuttingsIncrease in drag if pform > p mud formation close in around DP or DC (fill-up) drag forces
(water sensitive shales) during the connection or tripping
WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling
48
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
49/217
Change in cutting size
In hard formation increase the cutting size
In shale long slivers - blinded shaker
Change in character and size of cuttings can bewarning sign.
Increase in string weight
Presence of kick reduces buoyant effect, sometimes canbe observed - Archimedes Law
WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling
49
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
50/217
50
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
51/217
Increase the gas content in mud In mud logging - gas detection and analysis base
trend line - compared to actual data
Background gas Gas contained with cuttings gas cut mud undercompacted formation
Connection gas
Swabbing effect when the pump stopped befor kelly israised up
Trip gas - Swabbing during the trip, there is no APL
WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling
51
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
52/217
Gas-cut mud
Often gas-cut mud not sign of kick BHP reduce not significant
Gas expands only near the surfaceVarious reasons:
Gas gets into the mud from chips
Overpressured low permeability formation, Mud pressure is close to formation pressure.
WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling
52
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
53/217
53
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
54/217
Change in shale density
Normally increases density vs. depth
Free water squeezed out compaction
If density decreases below trend line containmore water
Overpressure suspected, at transition zone
Difficult measurement, selecting
WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling
54
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
55/217
Change in normalized drilling rate (d Exponent)
Jorden and Shirley in Gulf Coast in 1966 Shell Co.
drilling performance date can be used to detectthe top of overpressured sediments
to identify overpressures during drilling
WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling
55
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
56/217
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
57/217
Causes of Kick
Tripping
57
C f Ki k
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
58/217
Negative pressure waves reduce BHPIncreased by Pulling velocity High viscosity, gel strength Balling up the bit Plugged drill string Thick mud cake Small clearness between string and hole (Hole /
BHA geometry) Insufficient trip margin
Causes of KickSwabbing
58
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
59/217
Positive pressure waves increase BHP Caused by rheology of mud Lost of circulationTo minimize the surging:
Run in at slow rate Keep mud in good condition
low viscosity, low gel strength Break circulation periodically
Eliminate the tight BHA
Causes of KickSurging
59
Causes of Kick
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
60/217
Swabbing
60
Hi h V l S bbi
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
61/217
High Volume Swabbing
BHP
Martin-Decker
VERY DANGEROUS IN TOP HOLE VERY RAPID GAS EXPANSION VERY HIGH RATE OF UNLOADING NO TIME TO REACT!!!!
Balled-up bit / stabs
Formation pack off
Fluid not draining around bit
Pulling fluid column up
MD increases
Drillstring draining > BHP reducing
Gas entering well bore
61
C f Ki k
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
62/217
Trip marginTrip or safety margin counterbalance swabbing effectsduring connections and tripping.
for shallow holes 3,5 bar (50 psi)
for deep holes 14-21 bar (200-300 psi) 2 x Annular Friction Losses (or 200 psi)
Mud Weight calculation from Trip Margin (TM):
TVD0981.0inargTripMMWincrementExample:
TM = 17 bar (250 psi),TVD = 3050 m (10000 ft) MW i = 0.06 kg/liter (0,5 ppg)
Causes of KickTripping
62
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
63/217
Causes of KickSwabbing
Prevention: Low viscosity mud and low yield point Adjust pulling speed
Response & Recovery: Lower the drillstring back to bottom by stripping in Circulate bottoms up using poor-boy (free gas
separator) and degasser
63
Swabbing Resolution
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
64/217
Swabbing - ResolutionAfter Shut in the well P DP = P Ann - influx is below the bit
Two options: Volumetrically kill well or Perform combined
volumetric strip to below influx then circulate out influx using Drillers method.
P DP = 0, P Ann = X - influx is above the bit at drillstring annulus Circulate out influx using Drillers Method.
P DP < P Ann - influx is below the bit and around the drillstring
Two options Circulate slowly keeping P Static constant, and allow influx to
migrate up around the drillstring. Perform combined volumetric strip to below influx then circulate
out influx using Drillers method.64
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
65/217
BBLS
5
10
15
TRIPTANK
10 x 90 ft stands pulled
STARTVOLUME
FINISHVOLUME
PUMP
5 bbls
FILL VOLUMES TRIPPING
65
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
66/217
Causes of KickTripping
Roles of trip sheet Frequently or continual filling Normal conditions
hole filling after 5 stands of DP after 1 stand of DC
Good trip tank increments: / bbl if the hole not takes the correct mud volume
Flow check Tripping or stripping to bottom Bottoms-up circulation.
66
LEVEL DROP DRY PIPE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
67/217
Stands pulled :10 x 27.4 m = 274 m(10 x 90 ft = 900 ft)
LEVEL DROP DRY PIPE
Casing Capacity= 39,8 l/m (.0758 bbls/ft)
Pipe Metal Displacement= 4,01 l/m (.00764 bbls/ft)
Volume of metal removed from the well.Length Pulled x Metal Displacement274 x 4.01 = 1098 litre
(900 x .00764 = 6.876 bbls)
Annular capacity inside casing with pipestill inside casing.Casing Capacity - Metal Displacement39.8 -4.01 = 35.79 litre/m
(.0758 - .00764 = .06816 bbls/ft)
Level drop inside casingVolume of metal removed Annular Capacity1098 35.79 = 30 m
(6.876 .06816 = 100 ft)
100 ft
67
LEVEL DROP WET PIPE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
68/217
LEVEL DROP WET PIPE
Volume of fluid & metal removed from the well.Length Pulled x Closed End Displacement274 x 13.33 = 3652 litre
(900 x .0254 = 22.86 bbls)
Annular capacity inside casing with pipe still insidecasing.Casing Capacity - Closed End Displacement39.8 13.33 = 26.47 litre/m
(.0758 - .0254 = .0504 bbls/ft)
Level drop inside casingVolume of fluid & metal removed Annular Capacity3652 26.47 = 138 m
22.86 .0504 = 453 ft
453 ft
Pipe Capacity=9.32 l/m (.01776 bbls/ft)
Pipe Metal Displacement= 4,01 l/m (.00764 bbls/ft)
Casing Capacity= 39,8 l/m (.0758 bbls/ft)
Stands pulled :10 x 27.4 m = 274 m(10 x 90 ft = 900 ft)
68
P D P lli D Pi
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
69/217
Pressure Drop Pulling Dry Pipe
Mud Weight = 1.44 kg/liter (12 ppg)
(12 x 0.052) x 0.00764 x 9000.0758 - 0.00764
= 62 psi
274 m (900 ft)Length of pipe are pulled fromthe hole with no fill-up
DP Metal Displacement = 4.01 liter/m ( = 0.00764 bbls/ft)Casing Capacity: = 39.8 liter/m (0.0758 bbls/ft)
Pressure Drop Pulling Dry Pipe (bar/m):
Mud Weight (kg/l) * 0.0981 * DP Metal Displacement (l/m)Casing Capacity (l/m) DP Metal Displacement (l/m)
0158.001.48.39
01.4*0981.0*44.1bar/m
(bar/m)
Pressure Drop = 0.0158 (bar/m) * 274 (m) = 4.33 bar
MUD Weight (lb/ft) * 0.052 * DP Metal Displacement (bbls/ft)Casing Capacity(bbls/ft) DP Metal Displacement (bbls/ft)
(psi/ft)Field Unit:
69
ll274 (900 f )
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
70/217
Pressure Drop Pulling Wet Pipe
Mud Weight = 1,44 kg/liter (12 ppg)
12 x 0.052 x 0.0254 x 9000.0758 - 0.0254
= 282 psi
DP Metal Displacement = 4.01 liter/m ( = 0.00764 bbls/ft)
DP Capacity = 9.32 l/m (0.01776 bbls/ft)Casing Capacity: = 39.8 liter/m (0.0758 bbls/ft)
Pressure Drop Pulling Wet Pipe (bar/m) =
MUD Weight (kg/l) * 0,0981 * DP Closed End Displacement (l/m)Casing Capacity (l/m) DP Closed End Displacement (l/m)
0711.033.138.39
33.13*0981.0*44.1(bar/m)
(bar/m
Pressure Drop = 0.0711 (bar/m) * 274 (m) = 19.5 bar
Mud Weight (lb/ft) * 0,052 * DP Closed End Displacement (bbls/ft)Casing Capacity (bbls/ft) DP Closed End Displacement (bbls/ft)
(psi/ft)
Field Unit:
274 m (900 ft)Length of pipe are pulled fromthe hole with no fill-up
70
C f Ki k
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
71/217
Formation fracture can cause lost circulation Can be calculated
Can be measured Leak-off Test Problem of cavernous, faulted, fissured formations
of casing shoe
Causes of KickLost circulation
71
SIGNS OF ABNORMAL PRESSURE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
72/217
SIGNS OF ABNORMAL PRESSURE IN PLASTIC FORMATIONS
Increase mud returns; kick Verygood (5)
Drop in circulation pressure - SPM increase: kick Good (4)Increased drilling rate, drilling break : overpressure, kick Good (4)Increased pit level; kick Verygood (5)Change in cutting size; overpressure Good (4)
Overpulls, torque increase; overpressure Poor (3)d exponent: overpressure Good (4)Connection gas: overpressure Good (4)Trip gas, gas cut mud: overpressure Good (4)
Mud salinity, resistance: kick Poor (3)MWD (expensive): overpressure, kick Good (5)Shale density: overpressure Good (4)Return flow temperature: overpressure Very poor (2)
72
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
73/217
SHUT-IN PROCEDURE
73
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
74/217
SHUT-IN THEORY
Hard or Soft Shut-in : Which is the Best Approach ? Several shut-in procedures in use :
Variants of "Hard", "Soft Varying preferences results in confused drill crews
the operator and drilling contractor often haveconflicting procedures for shutting in the well.
To provide optimum safety of personnel whilemaintaining safety of the well.
Different well conditions Company policies
74
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
75/217
SHUT-IN PROCEDURES
Hard shut-inAdvantages
The influx is stopped in the shortest possible time
Minimises the volume of the influx.
Simple and quick - there is normally no need to changeany valve alignment.
The influx is stopped in the shortest possible time
Lower shut-in casing pressure Lower annular circulation pressures
Safety of personnel and equipmen t without risk to the well
75
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
76/217
SHUT-IN PROCEDURES
Hard shut-in Disadvantages
P ressure pulse or water hammer effect is produced inthe well-bore when the BOP is closed.
To cause possible formation damage.
Hard Shut-in or Soft Shut-in?
Depending on the company policy.
Majority of operators prefer hard shut-in.
76
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
77/217
SHUT-IN PROCEDURES
Soft shut-in
Advantage:
Pressure pulse or water hammer effect is notsignificant when the BOP is closed.
Disadvantages: The influx is stopped in longer time, Larger volume of influx, More complicated - need more steps to shut the well in. Higher shut-in casing pressure Higher circulating pressures
77
Hard Shut-in or Soft Shut-in
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
78/217
Investigate the water hammer effect using a 1430 m test well.
Hard Shut in or Soft Shut inwater hammer effect (EXAMPLE)
The pulse amplitudes are 57 psi for the hard shut-in 20 psi in soft shut-in case.
The effect of the water hammer pulseis even less significant compared tothe normal annular pressure build thanat surface. 78
Hard Shut-in or Soft Shut-in - water hammer effect (EXAMPLE)
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
79/217
Why is the amplitude of the pressure pulse so small ? BOP does not close instantly - effective closure time, "Tc . tr is the round trip travel time. The effect is to reduce the pressure wave amplitude by the ratio "tr/Tc 79
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
80/217
SHUT-IN PROCEDURES
BOP Closing time (API)All Type of BOP 30 sec
Except:Big size annular BOP: 18 < BOP size 45 sec
80
SHUT IN PROCEDURES
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
81/217
SHUT-IN PROCEDURESEXAMPLE
When is a Hard Shut-in Hard ? No reduction in P for tr > Tc :
BOP closure is very rapid (fast ram operation).
Hole is very deep. Depth limit for pressure reduction:
Hole depth < 6750 m (for Tc = 10 s). For the experiment, if there was NO reflected wave :
P 120 psi P is s t i l l l ess than the f ina l shu t -in p ress ure .
81
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
82/217
SHUT-IN PROCEDURES
Conclusions
Theory and experiment show small "water hammer"pulse in practical situations.
SOFT shut-in Little improvement to pressure pulse,
Significant effect from additional influx.
HARD shut-in
Water-hammer" smaller than shut-in pressure rise
82
SHUT-IN PROCEDURES
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
83/217
Possible Questions
What if contractor disagree on shut-in procedure ?
Decide at pre-spud meeting .
Higher mud velocity than during experiment ?
More important to shut-in rapidly. Pulse is larger but is still likely to be small
compared to shut-in pressure rise.
Effect of closing choke in soft shut-in ?
Lower pressure pulse is produced.
Effect is a delayed water-hammer .
83
Soft shut-inll
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
84/217
Drilling
Valve arrangements:
HCR is closed Choke open valve open to MGSShut-in procedure: Stop rotation - alarm
Kelly up - space out Tool Joint is not in ram BOP Stop pumps Check for flow If the well flows open HCR
Close BOP ( usually annular ) Close choke slowly (not considering if SICP exceeds
MAASP) Record SIDPP, SICP, Pit Gain, Depth
84
Soft Shut-inT i i
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
85/217
Tripping
Valve arrangements:
HCR is closed Choke open valve open to MGSShut-in procedure: Space out - TJ not in ram BOP Install the safety valve (kelly cock ) in open position Close safety valve (kelly cock) Flow check If the well flows - Open HCR to remote controlled choke
Close BOP ( usually annular ) Close choke slowly (not considering if SICP exceeds
MAASP) Record SIDPP, SICP, Pit gain, Bit Depth
85
Hard shut-in procedures
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
86/217
Hard shut in proceduresDrilling
Valve arrangements:HCR is closed Choke closed valve open to MGS
If kick occurs:
Stop rotation - alarm Kelly up - space out (Tool Joint is not in ram BOP) Stop pumps Check for flow
If the well flows - Close BOP ( usually annular ) Open HRC Read and record SIDPP, SICP, Pit Gain, Depth
86
Hard shut-in procedures
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
87/217
pTripping
Valve arrangements:HCR is closed Choke closed valve open to MGS
If kick occurs: Drill Pipe up - space out - Alarm Install the safety valve (kelly cock) in open position Close safety valve (kelly cock) Flow check If the well flows - Close BOP ( usually annular ) Open HRC to remote controlled choke Read and record SIDPP, SICP, Pit Gain, Depth
87
Collect Shut-in Data
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
88/217
Driller resposibility: Read and record SIDPP, SICP, Pit Gain and Hole Depth
Properly recording the SIDPP Properly recorded following pressure evolution , Permeability has to allow a proper pressure build up, Not taken too soon or too late, Drill stem must be full of clean mud (large kick).
Control of Drill stem is full of mud : Pump 10-40 strokes slowly, while SIDPP is constant
If SIDPP decreases Second pumping for control If SIDPP constant String is full with mud
Control of trapped pressure
88
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
89/217
Low or no SIDPP and SICP
Pressure gauges are shut off
No pressure R epeat flow check
Pressure is too low Float valve in DP
89
Measurement of SIDPP and SICP withBack Pressure Valve
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
90/217
SIDPP
1) Start the pump with very low pump rate,
2) Continue check both Drill pipe and Casing pressures
3) If casing pressure start to increase read drill pipe pressure this is SIDPP.
90
Collect Shut-in Data
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
91/217
Supervisor resposibility:Collect Shut in data from Driller - physically check it!
SIDPP - m ust checked with evolution
not just collected from Driller SICP must be collected and checked
Pit gain - must be collected and checked
Hole depth - must be collected and checked
Collect Shut-in Data
91
Monitor Bottom Hole Pressure
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
92/217
Supervisor :
Instruct Driller to monitor pressure changes on bothgauges, to avoid injection at shoe level.
Driller must instruct the supervisor befor the annularpressure reach the MAASP
The Supervisor may or may not ask the driller to bleed off.
Driller Monitor surface pressures and report to Supervisor. Driller has to do it whether or not he receives instructions
from Supervisor.
92
FORMATION PRESSURE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
93/217
Formation Pressure = Hydrostatic Pressure + SIDPP
EXAMPLE:
MW = 1.44 kg/l (12 ppg)
TVD = 2895 m (9500 ft)
SIDPP = 42 bar (600 psi)
1,44 x 2895 x 0.0981 = 409 bar
(12 x .052 x 9500 = 5928 psi)
Formation Pressure = 409 + 42 bar = 451
(5928 + 600 = 6528 psi)
600
psi
SIDPP=42 bar
Hydrostatic Pressure in Drillstring
93
Kill Mud Weight Well Data:
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
94/217
gOriginal MW = 1.44 kg/l (12 ppg)
Well Depth, TVD = 3048 m (10000 ft)
SIDPP = 42 bar (600 psi)
Formation Pressure = 473 bar (6528 psi)
600
psi
SIDPP42 bar
TVD = 3048 m
= 10000 ft
0981.0*)m(TVD
)bar (SIDPP)l/kg(OMW)l/kg(MWKill
l/kg58.10981.0*3048
4244.1
Field un i t :
052.0*)ft(TVD
)psi(SIDPP)ppg(OMW)ppg(MWKill
ppg16.13052.0*10000
60012
Kill Mud Weight:
94
HEIGHT OF INFLUXDetermine if the influx is below or above the drill collars
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
95/217
300psi
600psi
EXAMPLE 1. EXAMPLE 2.
1600 litre(10 bbl)
KICK
4000 litre(25 bbl)
KICK
Determine if the influx is below or above the drill collars
Volume of Influx to reach the top of DrillCollars = DCOH Capacity x DC Length =
= 16.8 l/m x 200 m = 3360 litre
= (0.032 bbls/ft x 656 ft = 21 bbls
95 m (227 ft)
Length DPOH = (4000 - 3360)/ 23.3 l/m = 28 m= (25 bbl - 21 bbl/0.044 = 91 ft
Length of kick = 27 + 200 = 227 m= (656 + 91= 747 ft
DCOH Capacity: 16.8 liter/m (0.032 bbl/ft)DPOH Capacity: 23.3 liter/m (0.044 bbl/ft)DC Length: 200 m (656 ft)
28 m (91 ft)
200 m (656 ft
Length of kick == 1600 /16,8 l/m = 95 m= (10 bbl/0.044 = 227 ft)
95
GRADIENT OF INFLUXInflux Density (kg/l) =
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
96/217
430 psi 715psi
SIDPP30 bar
SICP50 bar
Height of influx =160 m (525 ft)
Mud Weight = 1,44 kg/l (12 ppg)
Well Data:
Gradient of Influx (bar/m) == 0.166 kg/l x 0.0982 = 0.01628 bar/m
0981,0x)m(TVDInflux)bar (SIDPP)bar (SICP(
)l/kg(WeightMud
l/kg166.00981.0*160
)3050(44.1
Field Unit : Influx Density (ppg) =
Gradient of Influx (bar/m) == 1.56 ppg x 0.052 = 0.0811 psi/ft
052,0x)ft(TVDInflux))psi(SIDPP)psi(SICP(
)ppg(WeightMud
ppg56.1052.0*525
)430715(12
96
Influx Density
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
97/217
Influx Density
Densities:Gas 0,18 - 0,36 kg/liter (1,5 - 3 ppg)Oil 0,6 - 0,84 kg/liter (5 - 7 ppg)Salt water 1,03 -1,20 kg/liter (8,6 -10 ppg)
Gradients:Gas: 0,02 - 0,04 bar/m ( 0.078 0.156 psi/ft)Oil: 0,06 - 0,08 bar/m ( 0.260 0.364 psi/ft) Salt Water: 0,10 - 0,12 bar/m (0.482 0.520 psi/ft)
Bes t to hand le al l k icks as gas k i ck un t i l show sotherwise .
97
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
98/217
SHALLOW GAS CONSIDERATIONS
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
99/217
SUGGESTED DIVERTING PROCEDURE:
Space out so that the lower safety valve is above the drillfloor.
With diverter line open , close shaker valve and diverterpacker.
Maintain maximum pump rate and pump kill mud ifavailable.
Shut down all nonessential equipment. Monitor soil around the rig floor for evidence of gas
breaking out around conductor. If mud reserves run out then continue pumping with any
fluid. While drilling top hole a float valve should be run .
99
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
100/217
GAS BEHAVIOUR
100
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
101/217
Gas Migration
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
102/217
Gas Migration
Gas migration in an open well: Bottom Hole Pressure DECREASES Gas Bubble Pressure DECREASES Gas Bubble Volume INCREASES
Gas migration in a closed in well . All Pressures in the Wellbore INCREASE
Gas Bubble Pressure STAYS THE SAME Gas Bubble Volume STAYS THE SAME
102
Understanding Gas Behaviour
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
103/217
Understanding Gas Behaviour
You should be familiar with Boyles Gas Law .
(P1 x V1 ) = (P2 x V2)
The Ps stand for pressure and the Vs stand for volume. The P1 and V1 apply before any change has taken place.
The P2 , V2 apply after any change.
103
Uncontrolled Expansion
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
104/217
The gas bubble gets bigger,
It pushes more and more fluid out of the hole, The hydrostatic pressure of this mud is also lost,
The result is that BHP will drop,
This cause an under-balance and the influxentering the hole.
A1 bbls
B?? bbls
C353 bbls
Bottomhole Pressure (BHP)353 bar
(5,200 PSI)
(P1 x V1 ) = (P2 x V2)
(353 bar x 1 bbl) = (1 bar x V2) V2 = 353 bbl
104
Gas Migration in Closed Well
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
105/217
Gas Bubble is at the Bottom Hol e
800 liter (5 bbl) influx at Bottom Hole At the gas bubble the pressure is equal
to Hydrostatic Pressure (HP)
Mud Weight 1,2 kg/liter (10 ppg)
TVD = 3000 m (10000 psi)
HP = 0,0981 * 1,2 * 3000 = 353 bar(HP = 0,052 * 10 * 10000 = 5200 psi)
GAS 353 bar
(5,200 PSI)
800 liter(5 bbls)
Casing Shoe
1,2 kg/liter(10 ppg)
Mud
Choke
3000 m (10,000 feet)105
Gas Migration in Closed WellGas Bubble at the Surface
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
106/217
Gas Bubble at the Surface
Choke (closed)
BOP (Closed)
353 bar (5,200 PSI)Gas pressure
+353 bar (5,200 PSI)
Hydrostatic Pressure
The gas migrate to surface
(p1*V1 =p2*V2)
Gas volume unchanged in closed system =
= 800 liter, (5 bbl)
Gas Volume at Bottom = Gas Volume atSurface
Gas Press. at Bottom = Gas Press. at Surface
Gas Press. at Surface = 353 bar (5200 psi)
BHP =
= Gas Press. at Surface + Hydrostatic Press.
= 353 bar (5200 psi) + 353 bar (5200 psi) =
= 706 bar (10400 psi) BHP=706 bar(10400 psi) 106
Maximum Surface Pressure
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
107/217
When a gas kick is circulated to the surface, its volume will expand .
The gas will achieve its maximum volume at the surface .
Annular surface pressure depends on:
Greater underbalance
Larger vol ume of the kick Higher surface pressure
Lower density of the influx Annulus becomes smaller
Hole depth increases Pressures increase
Mud density increases
Circulating the kick with kill mud Lower surface pressures
Gas percolation in closed well Surface pressures close to FP
107
Gas Migration Rate
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
108/217
g
Gas Migration Rate (m/h) =Example:
SICP Increase in 1 hour = 20 bar (286 psi);Mud Weight = 1.44 kg/l (12 ppg)
Gas Migration Rate =
10.2l)eight kg/ud
bar/h)ICPnhange
h410. 21.44 kg/l)
bar/h)0
Field u ni t :
Gas Migration Rate = 0.052*g)Weight(ppMud(psi/h)SICPinChange
ht580.0522 ppg)
psi/h)86
108
Gas Migration Rate
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
109/217
Gas migration rate:
In water based mud: Average 0,5-5 m/min In salt water: 10-20 m/min in salt waterIn Oil based mud:
Methane dissolves in oil base mud 20-40 m /m Difficult the kick detection Large gas influx lower change in pit volume,
lower SICP.
When the influx is circulated up the wellbore No likely expansion , Rapid expansion at bubble point near to surface .
109
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
110/217
CIRCULATION and WELL CONTROL
110
Circulation and Well Control
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
111/217
Circulation and Well Control
Goals: Circulate kick out,
Pump kill mud in the hole,
Maintain constant BHP equal or slightly higher thanFormation Pressure,
Accurate SPM control,
Kill Sheet Calculation ,
111
Kill Rate KRReduced circulation
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
112/217
Reduced circulation Advantages :
Lower annulus friction pressure, Reduced risk of pump breakdown,
More time to react problems,
Reduced gas rates through mud-gas separator, Keeping within the capability of barite mixing system
Allows choke to work:
Proper orifice range,
Less pressure fluctuation in response to a change inchoke setting.
Normally 1/3 to 1/2 of normal drilling circulation rate112
Kill Rate Pressure (KRP)
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
113/217
113
KRP must be measured for both pumps and recorded indaily report and kill sheet:
Every tour by each driller ( at least in every shift )
When the pumps are repaired or liners changed
If mud properties are changed
Every 100 m (300 feet) of hole drilled
When the BHA changed
When bit nozzles are changed
Must be verified before well killing
Kill Rate Pressure (KRP) Calculation
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
114/217
Kill Rate Pressure (KRP) Calculation
New Pump Pressure with New Pump Rate approximate (bar):
Example: Old Pump Pressure: 200 bar (2862 psi)Old Pump Rate: 90 strks/minNew Pump Rate: 40 strks/min
2
)(strks/minRatePumpOld)(strks/minRatePumpNew
x)Press.(bar PumpOld(bar)Press.PumpNew
bar 5.39)(strks/min90
in)40(strks/mx200(bar)PressurePumpNew
2
psi565)(strks/min90
in)40(strks/mx2862(psi)PressurePumpNew
2
Field Unit:
114
Kill Rate Pressure (KRP) Calculation
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
115/217
Kill Rate Pressure (KRP) Calculation
New Pump Pressure with New Mud weight (bar):
Example:
Old Pump Pressure: 100 bar (1430 psi)New Mud Weight: 1,44 kg/liter (12 ppg)Old Mud Weight: 1,12 kg/liter (10.4 ppg)
(kg/l)WeightMudOld(kg/l)WeightMudNew
xar)Pressure(bPumpOld(bar)PressurePumpNew
ar b115(kg/l)1.25(kg/l)1.44
x(bar)100 PressurempNew
Field unit:
sip1650(ppg)10.4
(ppg)12x(psi)1430 PressurePumpNew
115
Initial Circulation Pressure (ICP)
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
116/217
ICP Calculation:ICP = Kill Pump Rate Pressure (bar) + SIDPP (bar)
Example:Kill Pump Rate Pressure (KRP): 52 bar (750 psi)Shut-in Drill Pipe Pressures (SIDPP): 14 bar (200 psi)
ICP (bar) = 52 + 14 = 66 ba r
Field Unit: ICP = 750 + 200 = 950 psi
116
Final Circulation Pressure (FCP)
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
117/217
OMW increase to KMW Circulation pressure decrease
Final Circulation Pressure, FCP (bar) =
= Kill Pump Rate Pressure (bar) x
Example: Kill Pump Rate Pressure: 100 bar (1430 psi)Kill Mud Weight: 1,44 kg/lit er (12 ppg)Original Mud Weight: 1,12 kg/liter (10.4 ppg)
)l/kg(WeightMudOriginal)l/kg(WeightMudNew
r ba115(kg/l)1.25(kg/l)1.44
x(bar)100 (FCP)PressurenCirculatioinal
psi1650(ppg)10.4
(ppg)12x(psi)(1430 (FCP)PressurenCirculatioFinal
Field unit:
117
Hole Volume CalculationP S k d Ti
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
118/217
Pump Strokes and Time
Surface to Bit (Drill String) Drill Pipe (DP)
Heawy Wall Drill Pipe (HWDP)
Drill Collar (DC) Bit to Surface (Total Annulus Volume)
Bit to Casing Shoe (Open Hole)
DC OH DP/HWDP OH
Casing Shoe to Surface (DP Casing)
118
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
119/217
WELL CONTROL METHODS
119
Maintenance of Primary Well Controlhil D illi d Ci l ti
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
120/217
while Drilling and Circulating
1. Ensure Mud weight correct.
2. Ensure pit level recorders are operational.
3. Any change inform Driller.
4. When a drilling break, take flow check .
5. Maintain accurate records.
120
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
121/217
Secondary Well Control
121
KILL METHODS
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
122/217
Objectives of Well Control Methods
Circulate the kick safely out of the well
Re-establish primary well control by restoring hydrostatic balance
Avoid additional kicks Avoid excessive pressures that may fracture the weak zone andinduce an underground blowout
122
Well Control Methods
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
123/217
Drillers Method Wait and Weight Method
Concurrent Method
Volumetric Method Bullheading
Reverse Circulation Method
1-2 most often used.
123
Differences
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
124/217
At drillers method
Kick circulated with Original Mud . Kill Mud circulated in second step.
At W W method
Kick circulated with Kill Mud.
At concurrent method
Mud Weigh increased in steps by step . New mud circulated down.
Circulating pressures recalculated.
124
Secondary Well ControlWell Control Methods String on Bottom
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
125/217
Well Control Methods String on Bottom
WAIT & WEIGHT - Applied universally as first choice
DRILLERS - Applied in highly deviated / horizontal wells & by mostoperators in most applications worldwide . SIMPLE!
CONCURRENT - Applied by some operators who still prefer toDrillers method. Pumping weighted mud can start any time.
BULLHEAD - Applied when conditions dictate (fractured formations)
REVERSE - Applied as primary method in workover operation.
VOLUMETRIC When string is plugged or circulation not possible
125
Secondary Well ControlThree Rules for Well Killing
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
126/217
Three Rules for Well Killing
Rule 1Keep BHP Formation Pressure
Rule 2Special cases annular friction loss is considered.
Rule 3Once the kick is below the casing shoe , the MAASP the criticalfactors for well killing.Once the kick is inside the casing , the pressure rating of surfaceequipment become critical factors for well killing.
126
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
127/217
Drillers Method
127
DRILLERS METHOD
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
128/217
DRILLERS METHOD
Viable option if barite was unavailable/limited
Mixing equipment limitations means long waiting time
Less chance of gas migration
Circulation begins right away
Weather may be a consideration
Fewer calculations at start of operation
Consideration to select the Drillers Method
128
DRILLERS METHOD
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
129/217
DRILLERS METHOD
Well under pressure longest with two circulation's
Under certain circumstances the highest shoe pressures
Standpipe pressure the highest for the longest time
Annular surface pressure the highest
Consideration do not select the Drillers Method
129
Drillers Method
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
130/217
Method
130
Drillers MethodProcedure
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
131/217
Procedure
Kick occurs, shut-in the well by the operator's/contractor's procedure
Record SIDPP, SICP, Pit gain
Complete the Kill Sheet
Some information are pre-recorded
Start circulation
Open choke start up pump to kill rate
SICP hold constant by choke (BHP is constant)
131
Drillers MethodProcedure
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
132/217
Pump at constant Kill Rate
ICP remain constant by choke Circulate kick out
ICP = KRP + SIDPP = Constant
If kick pumped out
Stop the pump, close the choke
Casing Pressure = SIDPP
Kill Mud Circulation
Open choke, bring pump to Kill Pump Rate
Casing pressure keep constant
132
Drillers MethodProcedure
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
133/217
While Kill Mud fill-up the drill string
ICP decrease to FCP
Kill Mud at the bit
Stop the pump, close the choke
Observe casing and drill pipe pressureCasing Pressure = SIDPP
SIDPP = 0
Start the pump
Open choke, bring pump to Kill Pump Rate
Casing pressure keep constant
133
Drillers MethodProcedure
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
134/217
Circulate until Kill Mud appears at the choke
Constant pump rate
Circulation pressure = FCP
Stop pump
close the choke keeping casing pressure constant Observe the pressures
Casing Pressure = Drill Pipe Pressure 0
Bleed off the trapped pressure through choke
Flow check through choke
If the well flows a dditional circulation.
134
Drillers Method
P(bar)
ICP= 71
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
135/217
SP= 10+
KPP= 28
+ FCP= 31 SIDPP= 33
Drillers MethodP(bar)
MAASP 3 = 134 MAASP 2 = 73 LOT
LOT = 100
Pa max = 92SIDPP= 33
SICP= 45
2033 870 1586 3619
4008
4877 Ote`avanje 6463
Pump (strks/m,in)
135
Drillers Method
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
136/217
Advantages
Simple calculations E asy to learn
Circulation start immediately
Limited problems
Stuck pipe
Plugging
Migration
Disadvantages
High surface casing pressure
High casing shoe pressure mud loss
Longer time of circulation.
136
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
137/217
Wait & Weight Method
137
WAIT & WEIGHT METHOD
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
138/217
WAIT & WEIGHT METHOD
One circulation:
lesss time on the choke and equipment is under pressure
In some circumstances lower casing shoe pressures
With a long open hole section less chance of lost circulation
Reduces pressures on standpipe side quickly
Consideration to select the W&W Method
138
WAIT AND WEIGHT METHOD
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
139/217
WAIT AND WEIGHT METHOD
Gas migration may become a problem while waiting on kill mud
Hole problems due to cuttings settling while waiting on kill mud
Cooling down period could induce hydrate formation.
Consideration do not select the W&W Method
139
Wait & Weight Method
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
140/217
140
Wait & Weight Method Procedure
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
141/217
Procedure
Kick occurs, shut-in the well by the operator's/contractor's procedure Record SIDPP, SICP, Pit gain
Complete the Kill Sheet
Some information are pre-recorded Start Kill Mud Circulation
Open choke, bring pump to Kill Pump Rate
SICP hold constant by choke (BHP is constant).
141
Wait & Weight Method Procedure
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
142/217
Procedure
While Kill Mud fill - up the drill string
Constant Kill Rate
Follow the Drill Pipe Pressure Plot
ICP decrease to FCP
Kill Mud at the bit
Stop the pump, close the choke
Observe casing and drill pipe pressure
Drill Pipe Pressure = 0
Casing Pressure SICP
142
Wait & Weight MethodProcedure
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
143/217
Circulate until Kill Mud appears at the choke
Constant pump rate
Circulation pressure = FCP
Stop pump
close the choke keeping casing pressure constant
Observe the pressures
Casing Pressure = Drill Pipe Pressure 0
Bleed off the trapped pressure through choke
Flow check through choke
If the well flows a dditional circulation.143
Secondary Well ControlWait & Weight & Drillers Methods
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
144/217
Phase 1
P DP
P ST
P C1
P C2
P C2
Standpipe Pressure for Drillers Method
Standpipe Pressurefor W&W Method
W&W: Well killed atend of Phase I inside thedrill string
SIDPP
.. due to change in mud
due to constant mud
144
Wait & Weight Method
Di d
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
145/217
Disadvantages:
Circulation can not start immediately. Long time to Wait & Weight- up the mud. Problems occures: Gas migration, Stuck pipe,
Downhole plugging.
Advantages: Kill Mud is present at the bottom before kick removed
through the choke. Lower surface casing pressure.
Lower casing shoe pressure at long openholesection (Volume surface to bit Openhole Volume).
Shorter time of circulation.
145
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
146/217
Volumetric Method
146
VOLUMETRIC METHOD
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
147/217
Volumetric Method is applied to a well if the hole conditionis having one of the followings:1. Circulation is not possible
String is out of the hole, String is plugged, Pump is shut-down or unavailable and there is a float valve in the
string.2. Circulation is not recommended
Bit is off bottom above the TVD; Stripping to bottom is not possible,
3. Bullheading is not possible
147
VOLUMETRIC METHOD APPLICATION
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
148/217
The Volumetric Method Application has the same concept ofConstant Bottom Hole Pressure Technique as the other wellcontrol methods have.
Choke manifold is connected to the Trip Tank.
Some pre-calculated amount of drilling mud is bled off from themanual choke for a selected pressure increase (working pressure)at every cycle.
BHP maintains constant because
BHP = SICP + HPmud
148
VOLUMETRIC METHOD APPLICATION
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
149/217
Volumetric Method Application has the same concept of ConstantBottom Hole Pressure Technique as the other well control methodshave.
Choke manifold is connected to the Trip Tank.
Some pre-calculated amount of drilling mud is bled off from themanual choke for a selected pressure increase (working pressure)at every cycle.
149
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
150/217
150
VOLUMETRIC METHOD APPLICATION
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
151/217
The following straightforward formula is used for the Volumetric
Well Control:Volume To Be Bled ( liter) =
Pressure Increase (bar) x Hole or Annular Capacity (liter/m)
Mud Gradient (bar/m)=
Volume To Be Bled:(liter or bbl)
Mud volume to be bled from the manual chokeat every cycle.
Pressure Increase:(bar or psi)
Selected working pressure on the casing gaugefor every cycle.
Hole or Annular Capacity:(liter/m or bbl/ft)
Capacity of the place where gas influx islocated in the hole.
Mud Gradient:(bar/m or psi/ft)
Drilling mud gradient in use.
151
VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
152/217
WELL CONFIGURATION:
After pulling out of the hole a kick is taken and the well is shut-in byblind rams. Formation influx is gas The kick has occurred because of the Trip Margin . The bullheading method was not possible due to the week formation at
the casing shoe. It is decided to use the volumetric method to control bottom hole
pressure as the influx migrates.
This will be done by using the followings:Safety margin 200 psiWorking pressure 100 psi
152
VOLUMETRIC METHOD KILL EXERCISEWELL DATA
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
153/217
MD/TVD: 5600 ft
9-5/8 casing shoe : 3950 ft
Open hole capacity: 0.0702 bbl/ft (hole capacity is constant)
Casing capacity: 0.0702 bbl/ft (hole capacity is constant)
Mud density in use: 12.6 ppg (0.655 psi/ft)Gas hydrostatic pressure: 25 psi (sabit)
Influx volume 12.6 bbl
Formation pressure (Pf) 3670 psi
SIDPP 0 psi (drill string is out of the hole)
SICP 100 psi
153
T100BOP
CLOSED
SICP= 100 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISE
MANUALCHOKE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
154/217
T100CLOSED
SICP= 100 psi (is stabilized casing pressure)BHP = Formation Pressure (3670 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
P (psi) x Ca (bbl/ft) V (bbl)
MG (psi/ft)=
.
V (bbl): Mud volume to be bled from the manual choke at every cycle.P (psi): Selected working pressure on the casing gauge for every cycleCa (bbl/ft): Capacity of the place where gas influx is located in the hole.
MG (psi/ft): Drilling mud gradient in use.
154
T100BOP
Closed
SICP= 100 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISE
MANUALCHOKE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
155/217
T100Closed
SICP= 100 psiBHP = Formation Pressure (3670 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
At the given example :
Safety Margin = 200 psi
Working Pressure (P) = 100 psi is selected
100 (psi) x 0.0702 (bbl/ft)V (bbl) 0.655 (psi/ft)=
= 10.7 bbls = 11 bbls !!
155
T400BOP
CLOSED
CP= 400 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISE
MANUALCHOKE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
156/217
T400CLOSED
CP = 400 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi (3970 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Casing Pressure = 400 psi,
BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
156
T400
CP= 400 psi
MANUALCHOKE
VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISE
BOPCLOSED
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
157/217
T400
CP= 400 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Casing Pressure = 400 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
11 bbl
To maintain the BHP 200 psi higher than Formation Pressure, Casing Pressure is held constant at 400 psi by Manual Choke
until 11 bbls mud is bled off into the Trip Tank.
157
T500
CP = 500 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISEBOP
CLOSEDMANUALCHOKE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
158/217
T
CP= 500 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi (3970 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Casing Pressure = 500 psi,
BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
11 bbl
158
T500
CP = 500 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISEBOP
CLOSEDMANUALCHOKE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
159/217
T500
CP= 500 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Casing Pressure = 500 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi olur.
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
22 bbl
To maintain the BHP 200 psi higher than FormationPressure,
Casing Pressure is held constant at 500 psi by ManualChoke until 11 bbls mud is bled off into the Trip Tank.
159
T600
CP = 600 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISEBOP
CLOSEDMANUALCHOKE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
160/217
T600
CP= 600 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi (3970 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Casing Pressure = 600 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.22 bbl
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
160
T600
CP = 600 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISEBOP
CLOSEDMANUALCHOKE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
161/217
T
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Casing Pressure = 600 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.33 bbl
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
CP= 600 psiBHP = Formastion Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)
To maintain the BHP 200 psi higher than Formation Pressure, Casing Pressure is held constant at 600 psi by Choke until
11 bbls mud is bled off into the Trip Tank.
161
T700
CP = 700 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISEBOP
CLOSEDMANUALCHOKE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
162/217
T
CP= 600 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi (3970 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Casing Pressure = 700 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.33 bbl
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
162
T700
CP = 700 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISEBOP
CLOSEDMANUALCHOKE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
163/217
T
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Casing Pressure = 700 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.44 bbl
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
CP= 700 psiBHP = Formastion Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)
To maintain the BHP 200 psi higher than Formation Pressure, Casing Pressure is held constant at 700 psi by Choke until
11 bbls mud is bled off into the Trip Tank.
163
1000
VOLUMETRIC METHOD KILL EXERCISE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
164/217
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200100
997766554433114433221100
22 88
C a s
i n g
P r e s s u r e
( p s i )
Bled Volume (bbl)
Start the LUBRICATE & BLEEDTECHNIQUE
Gas at surfaceWhen gas reaches the surface casingPressure does not increase any more.
164
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
165/217
LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUE
165
LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
166/217
Lubricate and Bleed Technique is the next stage of VolumetricMethod.
During the application of this procedure, Constant Bottom HolePressure Technique is applied to the well as used in the othermethods.
First mud is pumped through the kill line into the well and then gas isbled off from the manual choke to decrease the well head pressure.
166
VOLUMETRIC METHOD APPLICATION
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
167/217
The formula is used for the Volumetric Well Control:
Volume To Be Pumped ( liter) =
Pressure Decrease (bar) x Well or Annular Capacity (liter/m)
Mud Gradient (bar/m)=
Volume To Be Pumped:(liter or bbl)
Mud volume to be pumped pumped for theselected pressure decrease.
Pressure Decrease:(bar or psi)
Selected pressure decrease on the casingpressure.
Well or Annular Capacity:(liter/m or bbl/ft)
Well or annulus capacity where gas located inbelow the BOP.
Mud Gradient:(bar/m or psi/ft)
Gradient of the mud to be pumped into the well.
167
T700BOP
CLOSED
CP = 700 psi
MANUALCHOKE
MUD INLET
LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
168/217
T
CP= 700 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Surface equipment are lined up.
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
GAS OUTLETKILL LINE
MUD INLET
168
T750BOP
CLOSED
CP = 750 psi
MANUALCHOKEMUD INLET
LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
169/217
T
CP= 750 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 350 psi (4020 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Surface equipment are lined up.
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
GAS OUTLETKILL LINE
11 bbls kill mud is pumped into the well Then 10 to 15 minutes is waited for mud-gas separation. CP increases because of the gas compression. In this example, CP = 700+50 = 750 psi.
169
T600BOP
CLOSED
CP = 600 psi
MANUALCHOKEMUD INLET
LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
170/217
T
CP= 600 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Surface equipment are lined up.
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
GAS OUTLET
KILL LINE
CP is decreased to 600 psi by bleeding gas fromthe manual choke.
170
T675BOP
CLOSED
CP = 675 psi
MANUALCHOKEMUD INLET
LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
171/217
T
CP= 675 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 375 psi (4045 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Surface equipment are lined up.
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
GAS OUTLETKILL LINE
11 bbls kill mud is pumped into the well Then 10 to 15 minutes is waited for mud-gas separation. CP increases because of the gas compaction. In this example, CP = 600+75 = 675 psi.
171
T500BOP
CLOSED
CP = 500 psi
MANUALCHOKE
GAS OUTLETMUD INLET
LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
172/217
CP= 500 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Surface equipment are lined up.
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
GAS OUTLET
KILL LINE
CP is decreased to 500 psi by bleeding gas fromthe manual choke.
172
T0
CP = 0 psi
Surface equipment are lined up as
LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISEBOP
CLOSEDMUD INLET
MANUALCHOKE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
173/217
CP= 0 psiBHP = Formation Pressure
Surface equipment are lined up asshown in the figure at left.
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
KILL LINECHOKE LINE
GAS OUTLET
TRIPTANK
Lubricate & Bleed Technique is applied tothe well at every cycle by pumping 11 bblsmud into the well and bleeding gas for theequivalent 100 psi pressure decrease untilthe CP = 0 psi.
Mud volume to be pumped into the hole and the propercasing pressure decrease will may be lowered at thefollowing cycles. For example: 5.5 bbls mud is pumped
and then CP is decreased by 50 psi.
173
T0BOP
CLOSED
CP = 675 psi
MANUALCHOKEMUD INLET
LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
174/217
CP= 675 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 375 psi (4045 psi)
TRIP TANK
CHOKE LINE
Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft
Surface equipment are lined up.
Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi
GAS OUTLETKILL LINE
11 bbls kill mud is pumped into the well Then 10 to 15 minutes is waited for mud-gas separation. CP increases because of the gas compaction. In this example, CP = 600+75 = 675 psi.
174
1000
VOLUMETRIC METHOD and BLEED & LUBRICATE TECHNIQUE
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
175/217
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200100
997766554433114433221100
VOLUMETRICMETHOD
LUBRICATE & BLEEDTECHNIQUE
22
88
C a s
i n g P
r e s s u r e
( p s i )
Bled Volume (bbl) Pumped Volume (bbl)
Gas at surface
Gas is Out OfThe Well
175
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
176/217
Concurrent Method
176
Procedure for Concurrent method
Well is closed in
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
177/217
Well is closed-in,Basic information recordedCalculate kill sheet Calculate ICP, FCP, MW, strokes
Start the pump, bring up to KRSICP constantWhen pump is at KR Control ICP
When circulatingMud mixing personnel call up MW each time when it is readyWhen MW is pumping from surface to bit the choke operatoradjust the pressure by the graph.
Continue circulating untilKMW reaches to chokeWell is killed Flow check
177
Weight-up considerations Using Driller s, W&W, concurrent method
Th d b i h d ( i ) KWM
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
178/217
The mud must be weighted up (continue) to KWM.
Barite is the best weighting material Important to know required number of sacks
2W35
1W2W1470=SX
W1 - initial MW - ppg W 2 - desired MW - ppg
SX - sacks of barite to 100 bbl of mud
Vi volume increase bbl N number of sacks
9,14 NVi
178
Example
2 2 2
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
179/217
W1 = 12,2 ppg W 2 = 12,7 ppg
SX = 33 sacks to 100 bbl mud 100 lb/sack
Vmud - m 3 KWM, OMW - kg/liter
By the practice
Barite (t) =KWM2,4
OMWKWMV2,4
mud 2,4
BV ti
179
CONCURRENT METHOD
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
180/217
Most complicated
More record keeping
Higher casing pressure than W&W method (gas kick)
Complicated mud mixing - weighted up in a series steps
Weighting time - circulation time need But max CSG pressure less than at Driller s method.
180
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
181/217
LOW CHOKE-PRESSURE METHOD
181
LOW CHOKE-PRESSURE METHOD
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
182/217
SICP rises while circulating
But BHP is constant
Decrease SICP is safer?
Reduce BHP - new kick
Some cases low choke method is usable
Employed areas of underbalanced drilling
182
LOW CHOKE-PRESSURE METHOD
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
183/217
Drill tight low permeability formations Operator must be familiar Crew continue drilling
Underbalanced Keep high ROP Avoid damaging of fractured formations
Influx must be low Operator must have a good practice
Know the characteristics
SICP must be lower than limitations
183
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
184/217
Unusual Well Control Operation
184
Annulus Pressure with Influx on Bottom
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
185/217
holeof bottomonInfluxof Volume1Vholeof bottomatPressure1P
P o
H i n f l u x
influx
mudluxluxOtop inf inf
:Influxof topatPressure
luxHWellDmudtopPChokeP inf
:Chokeat Pressure
luxHShoeDWellDmudtopPShoeP inf
:Shoeat Pressure
185
Bottom of Influx at a known depth
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
186/217
P o
H i n f l u
x
P Bottom
P Top
X
*luxinf WellmudtopChokeHXDPP
mud
XO
P BottomP2P
2
11
112
22112V
PP
VZTPZTP
V
AnnulusCapluxH 2
V
*inf
luxlux
HbottomPtopP inf *inf
Shoeluxinf WellmudtopShoe DHXDPP *
186
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
187/217
Reverse Circulation
188
Reverse Circulation
R l d i D illi O ti b id d
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
188/217
Rarely used in Drilling Operations may be considered anoption in case of a weak shoe.
Common practise when killing a production well for aworkover - in cased hole.
In a reverse circulation kill, the fluid is pumped down thecompletion annulus and returns are taken up thecompletion .
The control of the operation is again by adjustment of thechoke opening on the line from the completion/tree.
It has the great advantage of filling the tubing and annuluswith kill fluid in one operation.
As the kill fluid enters the completion, there is a probabilitythat gas will be encouraged to enter the kill fluid as it ispumped up the completion . 189
Reverse Circulation
Tubingpressure
Packer fluid is not same then the killing fluid.
Tubing draw-down pressure is controlled by the choke .
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
189/217
Annuluspressure
Start the circulation
Tubing
strks
Pressure (bar)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0 500 800 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Tubing pressure draw-down chart
Tubing
Gas circulate out through Tubing
Packer fluid circulte through Tubing
Kill Fluid fill up the tubing
SITP
Tubing and annulus volume (strks)190
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
190/217
Blocked Nozzles
191
Post Kick Calculations Blocked Nozzles
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
191/217
Sudden rise on PC1 with no effect on Pchoke DP pressure loss will increase without effecting BHP Most likely around time 2 mud reaches bit if poor mixing
occursProcedure:
Shut In well and check all is OK, record P DP* Start to pump holding Pchoke constant. Drillers Method
Continue holding PST* constant Wait & Weight Method
Determine P C* (=PST* - PDP*) Determine the additional pressure due to blocked nozzles
(PC*-PC) Replot kill graph using this additional back pressure.
192
Secondary Well Control
Dealing with Blocked Nozzles (W&W)P *
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
192/217
Phase 1
PDP*
PDP
PST*
PST
PC*
PC
PC*-PCPC1
PC2
PC2*
PC*-PC
193
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
193/217
Losses above a Pressure Zone
194
Kicks & Losses - Losses above a Pressure Zone
G Ki k Sh B kd I l Bl
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
194/217
Gas Kick Shoe Breakdown Internal Blowout
Initial P BH = TVDH x mud PBH after kick = P O = Initial P BH + PDP Initial P Shoe = TVDCsg x mud
PShoe after kick = Initial P Shoe + PAnn Initial Influx Height = (P Ann PDP) (mud infl) As shoe breaks down, crossflow from reservoir to
loss zone will occur. At high rates this will cause
drawdown on the reservoir, reducing near well-bore P O ( PBH Flowing ).
0
195
Kicks & Losses - Losses above a Pressure ZonePAnnP DP
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
195/217
mud gas
P FS
P O
196
Losses above a Pressure zone Development of an Internal BlowoutP
AnnP DP
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
196/217
0
mud gas
P FOP FP P UF
Drawdown
Q increasing
197
Losses above a Pressure zone Annulus Siphoned Empty of Mud
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
197/217
0
P FOP FP
P UF
Q increasing
Q increasing
Drawdown
Siphoning out Siphoning out
198
Losses above a Pressure zone - Resolution
Final situation can cause high casing pressures at surface
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
198/217
Pump water or low density mud down the annulus mud < fracture propagation pressure Keeps gas out of csg, reduces surface pressures
Keep drillstring full if possible
Increases BPH and reduced production rate Prevents nozzles plugging Prevents ingress of gas into drillstring
Attempt to cure losses by pumping LCM Beware proppant effect in fractures Consider pumping gunk (diesel / barites) down annulus &
water down string199
Losses above a Pressure zone - Resolution
If unable to cure losses: Prepare heavy mud with density:
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
199/217
Prepare heavy mud with density:
CSGH
losses.aboveCSGO*M DD
DP
When ready, pump 2 x OH Annulus volume down DP Displace to bit with 1 mud
This should reduce the influx rate and,assuming only one loss zone, should killwell.
200
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
200/217
Losses above a Pressure zone Resolution
201
Losses above a Pressure zone - Resolution
If losses are cured
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
201/217
Indicated by increase in P DP and P Ann Prepare kill mud based on estimated P O Monitor P DP as gas migrates into the csg from OH annulus
Keep P BH constant by keeping P DP constant Consider displacing gas using Drillers method
Displace well to new mud gradient using Weight & waitmethod.
Will be necessary to isolate loss zone (and much of OH section)behind casing before drilling ahead.
202
Kicks & Losses - Losses below a Pressure zone
If loss zone penetrated below a pressure zone. x
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
202/217
DGas
DH
flowstart towillthen wellP
LossesafterSandGasatPressure
SandGasat pressuremudInitial
can takeformationloss that pressureMaxInitial
Gas Mud Gas
Mud Gas
Mud Gas
Mud H
Mud H BH
X D If
X D Mud
D
X D D P
If no action is taken. Levels in DP and annulus will drop, If overbalance is lost gas influx will occur,
Gas will percolate up and down, As gas rises in annulus, mud will be displaced until
flow is seen at surface, Well would then be closed in.
203
Losses below a Pressure zone Development of Internal Blowout
When well is shut in Gas migration up the annulus if not allowed to
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
203/217
Gas migration up the annulus if not allowed toexpand will increase P BH leading to morelosses.
Gas will flip with mud causing casing to befilled with gas.
Eventually whole well may become displacedto gas.
Surface pressure will rise to close to theFlowing P O of the gas zone.
An internal blowout will occur with the lowerzone becoming supercharged.
DGas
DH204
Losses below a Pressure zoneImmediate Response
On observing losses:
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
204/217
1. Keep annulus full if possible Pump mud and then water Will reduce drawdown on producing interval
mWGZwWGZ
wmWHmPZ
CSGxDPW
HDHPdrawdownZoneGasHDPPressurePorezoneLoss
CapV
H
:lossesobservingafterwaterof bblVwithfilledisholeIf
205
Losses below a Pressure zone Resolution
1. Attempt to cure losses down the drillstring with LCM Use circulating sub if installed
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
205/217
g
Beware plugging bit nozzles2. Minimum nozzle size when pumping LCM: 14/32
If LCM unsuccessful consider: Diesel / Bentonite gunk pill Thixomix (flash setting) cement Cement / LCM combinations
3. After curing losses:1. Set cement plug across / above loss zone2. Displace well back to 1 mud3. Set casing / drilling liner to isolate producing zone4. Drill ahead.
206
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
206/217
Horizontal Well Control
207
Horizontal Holes
M h i l ll d ill d f d l h
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
207/217
Most horizontal wells are drilled for development as ratherthan for exploration reasons.
Well control in these situations might not be regarded ascritical as:
Reservoir behaviour / pressure is well known Mud weight generally selected to provide overbalance and
maintain well-bore stability - an under-balance is unlikely
Casing is normally set directly above the producingformation
However, horizontal wells have a great capacity for flow.
208
Horizontal Drilling Well ControlCauses of Kicks
Insufficient mud weight:
8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf
208/217
Insufficient mud weight:-
Drilling across a fault into a high pressure formation
Mud weight reduced due to gas cutting, water cutting
Swabbing:-