Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    1/217

    WELL CONTROL LAB

    Dr. Tibor Szab

    1

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    2/217

    Course Description

    Causes of kicks, warning signs of kicks,shutting-in procedures, the risk of shallow gas,stripping operation, pressure balance in thehole, behavior of gas in the well, well controlmethods, well control equipment, BOP stackarrangements, manifolds and valves systems,

    other devices, the functions and capacity ofthe accumulator unit, pressure testing of wellcontrol equipment, regulations and standards.

    2

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    3/217

    Assessment

    Students will be assessed with using thefollowing elements.

    Attendance: 5 % Homework 10 % Short quizzes 10 %

    Midterm exam 40 % Final exam 35 % Total 100%

    3

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    4/217

    Grading

    % value Grade

    90 -100% 5 (excellent)

    80 89% 4 (good)

    70 - 79% 3 (satisfactory)

    60 - 69% 2 (pass)

    0 - 59% 1 (failed)

    4

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    5/217

    Literature

    T. Bell, D. Eby, J. Larrison, B. Ranka: BlowoutPrevention, 4th Ed. ISBN 0-88698-242-1. 2009.

    R. Baker: Practical Well Control, 4th Ed. ISBN 0-

    88698-183-2. 1998. R. Grace: Blowout and Well Control Handbook, Gulf

    Publishing Company, ISBN: 0750677082.

    R. D. Grace: Advanced Blowout & Well Control, GulfPublishing Company, 1994, ISBN 0-88415-260-X.

    5

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    6/217

    6

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    7/217

    Estimated Costs of Blowouts

    Location and Event Year Cost M $

    North Sea, Ekofisk Platform, Blowout 1976 56West Africa, Onshore Blowout 1978 90

    North America, H2S Blowout 1982 50North America, Underground Event, Jack-Up 1985 124

    S. America, Platform Blowout 1988 530North Sea, Platform Explosion and Fire 1988 1360Norvegian North Sea, Underground Blowout 1989 284Kuwait Oil Co., Al-Awda Project, Kuwait 1991 5400

    Pusztaszls 34 2000 38

    Csunking 233 dead, 20000 evacuationNagylengyel 282A 3000 evacuation

    7

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    8/217

    PRESSURE CONCEPTSPressure Fundamentals

    8

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    9/217

    The U-tube

    MW - 10 ppgTVD - 10,000 ft

    String Annulus

    HP = MW x 0.052 x TVD= 10 x 0.052 x 10,000

    = 5,200 psi

    HP = MW x 0.052 x TVD= 10 x 0.052 x 10,000

    = 5,200 psi

    Two columns of fluid:One inside the pipe & one in the annulusThese two columns of fluid act to form a U-tube .If the MW in the pipe & annulus is the same then the mud level will same

    9

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    10/217

    Hydrostatic pressure

    Primary Control Hydrostatic pressure > Formation pressure

    KICK (underbalance) Hydrostatic pressure < Formation pressure

    Secondary Control Hydrostatic press + SIDPP = Formation

    pressure

    Tertiary Control Shear/seal Ram Baryte Plug

    10

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    11/217

    Hydrostatic Pressure

    MeasuredDepth = MD

    True VerticalDepth = TVD

    Static pressure of a liquid increases with density anddepth TVD

    Hp = g TVD (kg/liter*0,0981 *m) = barHP = 0,052 MW TVD (lb/ft * ft) = psi

    Mud gradient (MG), pressure gradient:

    grad Hp = p/TVDMG = MW*0,052 (ppg*0,052) = psi/ft

    MG = MW*0,0981 (kg/l*0,0981)= bar/m

    11

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    12/217

    Abnormal Pressure

    12

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    13/217

    Abnormal PressureGradients

    Normal Pressure GradientsWest Texas: 0.433 psi/ft - 8.33 ppg 0,0981 bar/mGulf Coast: 0.465 psi/ft 9,0 ppg - 0,106 bar/m

    Normal and Abnormal Pore Pressure

    Pore Pressure, psig

    D e p

    t h , f

    t

    10,000 ? ?

    Normal (IWCF):1,07 kg/l 0,105 bar/m

    13

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    14/217

    Overpressure Due To Density Differences

    Large Structures: - large anticline, dome

    Hydrostatic pressure gradient is lower in gas or oil

    than in water. 14

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    15/217

    Overpressure Due To Folding

    15

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    16/217

    Overpressure Caused By Salt Dome

    16

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    17/217

    Pore Pressure Development Due toUndercompaction

    17

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    18/217

    20. Abnormal Pressure 411. Well Drilling Slide 18 of 41

    s OB = p + s Z

    s ob

    p s z

    18

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    19/217

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    20/217

    When crossing faults it is possible to go from normalpressure to abnormally high pressure in a short

    interval. 20

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    21/217

    Determination of Fracture Gradient

    To avoid lost circulation while drilling it is importantto know the variation of fracture gradient with depth.

    Formation Integrity tests represent an experimental approach to fracture gradient determination.

    Below are listed and discussed three theoreticalapproaches to calculating the fracture gradient.

    Formation fracture pressure can be expressed: Fracturing Pressure, bar (psi), Equivalent mud weight, kg/liter, (ppg), Fracture gradient, bar/m (psi/ft).

    21

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    22/217

    Fracture Gradients Determination (Theoretical )

    1. Hubbert & Willis:

    Where: F = Fracturing Gradient, psi/ft, P = Pore Pressure Gradient, psi/ftD = Depth, ft

    D

    P21

    3

    1F

    min

    D

    P1

    2

    1F

    max

    2. Matthews & Kelly:

    Where: Ki = Matrix Stress Coefficient , = Vertical Matrix Stress, psi,D = Depth, ft

    DP

    DK

    F is

    s

    3. Ben Eaton:

    Where: S = Overburden Stress, psi, = Poissons Ratio, D = Depth, ft

    D

    P

    1*

    D

    PSF

    Operators prefer to perform leak-off or formation-competency tests to estimatethe fracture gradient,

    22

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    23/217

    Formation Integrity (Practical)

    Formation strength tests can be carried out to determine:

    Limit Test : A test carried out to a specified value ,always below the fracture gradient of the formation. Can be carried out in any open hole or perforated

    section. Low permeable formation

    Leak-off Test : carried out to the point where theformation leaks off. On Wild-Cat wells at each casing shoe On development wells, recommended

    Fracture Gradient Test : A test carried out to the leak offpoint and beyond until the formation is breakdown .

    23

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    24/217

    StableFracture

    Propagation

    UnstableFracture

    Propagation Fracture Closure Phase,

    Stop Pumping

    Formation Integrity or Limit Test

    Leak-Off Test (LOT)

    LP

    LOP

    FOP

    UFP

    FPP

    ISIP

    FCP /MHS

    LP = Limit PressureLOP= Leak-Off PressureFOP= Fracture Opening PressureUFP= Uncontrolled Fracture Pressure

    FPP= Fracture Propagation Press.ISIP= Instantaneous Shut-In Press.FCP= Fracture Closure PressureMHS = Minimum Horizontal Stress

    VOLUME

    P R E

    S S U R E

    TIME

    Typical Formation Breakdown Test

    24

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    25/217

    Principle of Leak-off Test (LOT)

    Investigate the wellbore capability with regard to Determination of maximum mud weight MAASP for safe well control operations Setting depth of the next casing,

    Collect information on formation strengths Optimisation of well planning, Hole stability,

    Reservoir application, Well Control

    25

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    26/217

    Leak-off Test Procedure

    1) Drill out shoe and 3-5 m (10 - 15 ft) of new hole

    2) Circulate mud until uniform3) Pull bit inside shoe

    4) Line up on high pressure low volume pump.5) Close the BOP.

    26

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    27/217

    Leak-off Test Procedure

    1 2 3 4

    6) Pump down drillpipe or annulus low rate HP pump) max 80 litre/min (1/2 bbl/min)

    7) Plot the Volume vs. Pressure

    8) STOP when a change in the pressure curve is noticed

    9) Repeat test verify the LO point

    LOP

    Pressure

    Volume (Strks)

    Accuratepressure gauge

    27

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    28/217

    Leak Off Test Calculations

    1 2 3 4

    100200300400500600700800900100011001200

    Stop Pumping

    bbls

    Shoe TVD = 1675 m (5495 ft)

    Test Mud = 1.26 kg/l (10.5 ppg)

    Hydrostatic Pressure of Test Mud tothe Shoe:

    1.26 x 0.0981 x 1675 = 207 bar

    10.5 x .052 x 5495 = 3000 psi

    Fracture Pressure = Hydrostatic Pressure + LOP =

    = 207 + 70 = 277 bar = (3000 + 1000 = 4000 psi)

    Leak-off Pressure70 bar (1000 psi)

    28

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    29/217

    Formation Strength - Limit Test

    Test Objective: Confirm pressure integrity of

    formation to a pre-determinedpressure.

    Limitations: Limited guidance on the integrity ofthe casing shoe.

    Does not quantify propertiesassociated with fracturing stresses.

    Limit test provides limited

    information!

    Surface Limit Press. (LP)

    Volume Pumped(or time @ constant pump rate)

    S u r f a c e

    P r e s s u r e

    29

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    30/217

    Leak Off Test Low and High Permeable Formation

    Leak Off Press(LOP)

    Vol.

    P r e

    s s u r e

    Initial Press

    Vol.

    P r e s s u r e

    Final Press

    High Permeable Formation Low Permeable Formation

    30

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    31/217

    Leak-off Test Report

    31

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    32/217

    Maximum Allowable Mud Weight

    Maximum Allowable Mud Weight (kg/l) =

    Example :Surface Leak-off Pressure = 50 bar (714 psi)

    Casing Shoe Depth (TVD) = 1000 m (3048 ft)Mud Weight in Hole = 1,44 kg/liter (12 ppg)

    Max. Allowable Mud Weight (kg/l)

    )l/kg(HoleinMudWeight(m)TVDDepth,ShoeCasing

    10.2x(bar)essurePr LeakOff

    l/kg95.1)l/kg(44.1(m)1000

    10.2x(bar)50

    ppg5.16)ppg(120.052x(ft)3048

    (psi)714

    Field Unit:

    Max. Allowable Mud Weight (ppg)

    32

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    33/217

    Maximum Allowable Annulus Surface Pressure MAASPEvery time the mud weight is changed, the MAASP changes and must be re-calculatedusing Maximum Allowable Mud Weight.

    MAASP =

    Example:Max. Allowable Mud Weight = 1.95 kg/l (16.5 ppg)Mud Weight in Hole = 1.44 kg/l (12 ppg)Casing Shoe Depth (TVD) = 1000 m (3048 ft)

    10.2)m(TVDShoex)]l/kg(HoleinWeightMud)l/kg(WeightMud Allowable.Max[

    bar 5010.2

    )m(1000x)]l/kg(44.1)l/kg(95.1[MAASP

    Field Unit:MAASP (bar)== (Max. Allowable MW (ppg) - MW in Hole (ppg)) x Shoe TVD (ft) x 0.052

    = (16.5 12) x 3048 x 0.052 = 714 psi33

    ll h l l

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    34/217

    FORMATION STRENGTH DATA:

    SURFACE LEAK-OFF PRESSURE FROM

    FORMATION STRENGTH TEST (A) 64 bar

    DRLG FLUID DENSITY AT TEST (B) 1,25 kg/l

    0,1225 bar/m

    MAX. ALLOWABLE DRILLING FLUID DENSITY:(A) x 10.2

    (B) + SHOE T.V.DEPTH (C) 1,79 kg/l

    0,1759 bar/m

    INITIAL MAASP:[(C) - CURR. DENSITY] x SHOE T.V.D. =

    10.2

    64,00 bar

    Kill Sheet CalculationMAASP

    34

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    35/217

    CAUSES OF KICK

    35

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    36/217

    Causes of Kick

    Any time the formation pressure greater than BHP:

    Penetration into overpressure formation Abnormal pressure Insufficient mud weight

    Excessive drilling rate through gas sand

    Swabbing surging

    If height of mud column is allowed to drop Total mud loss Improper hole filling while tripping

    36

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    37/217

    Causes of Kick

    Early Kick Detection Closed circulation system Flow rate IN equal flow rate OUT Constant pit level

    Exception

    Oil base mud gas kick may be dissolved

    37

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    38/217

    Kick Size

    By Bill Rehm:

    kick size < 3 m 3 (18 bbl) no problem ,

    3 m 3 < kick size < 6 m 3 (40 bbl) good job ,

    6 m 3 < kick size God help!

    38

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    39/217

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    40/217

    WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling

    Changes in drilling rate Drilling Break High pressure shale or sand ROP increases if water base mud - rock bit - drilling

    break Accepted policy : drill maximum 1 m (2-4 ft) flow check

    When ROP suddenly increases indicate thepossibility of kick!

    40

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    41/217

    ROP As An Indicator of Overpressure

    41

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    42/217

    WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling

    Increased return flow rate

    If the well kicks - return flow rate increases Flow measurement devices - return flow indicator

    If well flowing suspected- flow check Stop drilling Kelly up Stop pump Flow check

    42

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    43/217

    Flow check (WBM) in the case of water base mud Recommended up to 10 min If the well does not flow:

    - During drilling flow check If the well flows: - Shut in the well,- Well killing operation

    WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling

    43

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    44/217

    Flow check in OBMIn the case of oil base mud Recommended up to 20 min - absorbed gas!

    If the well does not flow: Bottoms-up circulation Drilling ahead 3 m (10 ft) flow check

    Bottoms-up circulation short trip

    if the well flows: Shut in the well - start well killing operation

    WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling

    44

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    45/217

    Pit gain

    Positive indication - indication alarm!

    Pit level indicators show and record gain/loss of mud

    Information during drilling or tripping Not exact sign - mud is added or taken from pit

    Quick shut-in

    Rate of pit gain - indication of permeability

    WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling

    45

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    46/217

    High permeable formation

    If slightly underbalanced good kick detection

    - drilling break associated

    Low permeable formation

    If slightly underbalanced

    - difficult detect the kick

    - slow flow rate, slow pit gain

    - drilling break not associated

    - underbalanced - only gas cut mud appear

    WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling

    46

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    47/217

    Influx Rate =

    The influx rate depending on: Driller resposibility:

    Permeability of formation ( k = 200 mD ) NO ln Re/Rw = 2 NO Gas viscosity ( = 0,3 cp ) NO

    Pressure difference ( P=42 bar (624 psi) YES / NO Penetration to formation ( L=6 m (20 ft)) YES Time of identification (0 min) YES Time the shut in ( 2 min ) YES

    1440RR

    ln

    Lpk0,007q

    we

    Darcy Law

    144020.3

    6422000.007

    Kick size = 6,24 m3 (40bbl)

    3 m3/min

    = 20 (bbl/min)

    47

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    48/217

    Decrease pump pressure increase pump rate gas at the annulus helps for pumping U tube

    Increase in rotary torque

    greater increase in transition zone large amount of cuttingsIncrease in drag if pform > p mud formation close in around DP or DC (fill-up) drag forces

    (water sensitive shales) during the connection or tripping

    WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling

    48

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    49/217

    Change in cutting size

    In hard formation increase the cutting size

    In shale long slivers - blinded shaker

    Change in character and size of cuttings can bewarning sign.

    Increase in string weight

    Presence of kick reduces buoyant effect, sometimes canbe observed - Archimedes Law

    WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling

    49

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    50/217

    50

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    51/217

    Increase the gas content in mud In mud logging - gas detection and analysis base

    trend line - compared to actual data

    Background gas Gas contained with cuttings gas cut mud undercompacted formation

    Connection gas

    Swabbing effect when the pump stopped befor kelly israised up

    Trip gas - Swabbing during the trip, there is no APL

    WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling

    51

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    52/217

    Gas-cut mud

    Often gas-cut mud not sign of kick BHP reduce not significant

    Gas expands only near the surfaceVarious reasons:

    Gas gets into the mud from chips

    Overpressured low permeability formation, Mud pressure is close to formation pressure.

    WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling

    52

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    53/217

    53

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    54/217

    Change in shale density

    Normally increases density vs. depth

    Free water squeezed out compaction

    If density decreases below trend line containmore water

    Overpressure suspected, at transition zone

    Difficult measurement, selecting

    WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling

    54

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    55/217

    Change in normalized drilling rate (d Exponent)

    Jorden and Shirley in Gulf Coast in 1966 Shell Co.

    drilling performance date can be used to detectthe top of overpressured sediments

    to identify overpressures during drilling

    WARNING SIGNS OF KICKSDrilling

    55

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    56/217

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    57/217

    Causes of Kick

    Tripping

    57

    C f Ki k

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    58/217

    Negative pressure waves reduce BHPIncreased by Pulling velocity High viscosity, gel strength Balling up the bit Plugged drill string Thick mud cake Small clearness between string and hole (Hole /

    BHA geometry) Insufficient trip margin

    Causes of KickSwabbing

    58

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    59/217

    Positive pressure waves increase BHP Caused by rheology of mud Lost of circulationTo minimize the surging:

    Run in at slow rate Keep mud in good condition

    low viscosity, low gel strength Break circulation periodically

    Eliminate the tight BHA

    Causes of KickSurging

    59

    Causes of Kick

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    60/217

    Swabbing

    60

    Hi h V l S bbi

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    61/217

    High Volume Swabbing

    BHP

    Martin-Decker

    VERY DANGEROUS IN TOP HOLE VERY RAPID GAS EXPANSION VERY HIGH RATE OF UNLOADING NO TIME TO REACT!!!!

    Balled-up bit / stabs

    Formation pack off

    Fluid not draining around bit

    Pulling fluid column up

    MD increases

    Drillstring draining > BHP reducing

    Gas entering well bore

    61

    C f Ki k

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    62/217

    Trip marginTrip or safety margin counterbalance swabbing effectsduring connections and tripping.

    for shallow holes 3,5 bar (50 psi)

    for deep holes 14-21 bar (200-300 psi) 2 x Annular Friction Losses (or 200 psi)

    Mud Weight calculation from Trip Margin (TM):

    TVD0981.0inargTripMMWincrementExample:

    TM = 17 bar (250 psi),TVD = 3050 m (10000 ft) MW i = 0.06 kg/liter (0,5 ppg)

    Causes of KickTripping

    62

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    63/217

    Causes of KickSwabbing

    Prevention: Low viscosity mud and low yield point Adjust pulling speed

    Response & Recovery: Lower the drillstring back to bottom by stripping in Circulate bottoms up using poor-boy (free gas

    separator) and degasser

    63

    Swabbing Resolution

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    64/217

    Swabbing - ResolutionAfter Shut in the well P DP = P Ann - influx is below the bit

    Two options: Volumetrically kill well or Perform combined

    volumetric strip to below influx then circulate out influx using Drillers method.

    P DP = 0, P Ann = X - influx is above the bit at drillstring annulus Circulate out influx using Drillers Method.

    P DP < P Ann - influx is below the bit and around the drillstring

    Two options Circulate slowly keeping P Static constant, and allow influx to

    migrate up around the drillstring. Perform combined volumetric strip to below influx then circulate

    out influx using Drillers method.64

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    65/217

    BBLS

    5

    10

    15

    TRIPTANK

    10 x 90 ft stands pulled

    STARTVOLUME

    FINISHVOLUME

    PUMP

    5 bbls

    FILL VOLUMES TRIPPING

    65

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    66/217

    Causes of KickTripping

    Roles of trip sheet Frequently or continual filling Normal conditions

    hole filling after 5 stands of DP after 1 stand of DC

    Good trip tank increments: / bbl if the hole not takes the correct mud volume

    Flow check Tripping or stripping to bottom Bottoms-up circulation.

    66

    LEVEL DROP DRY PIPE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    67/217

    Stands pulled :10 x 27.4 m = 274 m(10 x 90 ft = 900 ft)

    LEVEL DROP DRY PIPE

    Casing Capacity= 39,8 l/m (.0758 bbls/ft)

    Pipe Metal Displacement= 4,01 l/m (.00764 bbls/ft)

    Volume of metal removed from the well.Length Pulled x Metal Displacement274 x 4.01 = 1098 litre

    (900 x .00764 = 6.876 bbls)

    Annular capacity inside casing with pipestill inside casing.Casing Capacity - Metal Displacement39.8 -4.01 = 35.79 litre/m

    (.0758 - .00764 = .06816 bbls/ft)

    Level drop inside casingVolume of metal removed Annular Capacity1098 35.79 = 30 m

    (6.876 .06816 = 100 ft)

    100 ft

    67

    LEVEL DROP WET PIPE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    68/217

    LEVEL DROP WET PIPE

    Volume of fluid & metal removed from the well.Length Pulled x Closed End Displacement274 x 13.33 = 3652 litre

    (900 x .0254 = 22.86 bbls)

    Annular capacity inside casing with pipe still insidecasing.Casing Capacity - Closed End Displacement39.8 13.33 = 26.47 litre/m

    (.0758 - .0254 = .0504 bbls/ft)

    Level drop inside casingVolume of fluid & metal removed Annular Capacity3652 26.47 = 138 m

    22.86 .0504 = 453 ft

    453 ft

    Pipe Capacity=9.32 l/m (.01776 bbls/ft)

    Pipe Metal Displacement= 4,01 l/m (.00764 bbls/ft)

    Casing Capacity= 39,8 l/m (.0758 bbls/ft)

    Stands pulled :10 x 27.4 m = 274 m(10 x 90 ft = 900 ft)

    68

    P D P lli D Pi

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    69/217

    Pressure Drop Pulling Dry Pipe

    Mud Weight = 1.44 kg/liter (12 ppg)

    (12 x 0.052) x 0.00764 x 9000.0758 - 0.00764

    = 62 psi

    274 m (900 ft)Length of pipe are pulled fromthe hole with no fill-up

    DP Metal Displacement = 4.01 liter/m ( = 0.00764 bbls/ft)Casing Capacity: = 39.8 liter/m (0.0758 bbls/ft)

    Pressure Drop Pulling Dry Pipe (bar/m):

    Mud Weight (kg/l) * 0.0981 * DP Metal Displacement (l/m)Casing Capacity (l/m) DP Metal Displacement (l/m)

    0158.001.48.39

    01.4*0981.0*44.1bar/m

    (bar/m)

    Pressure Drop = 0.0158 (bar/m) * 274 (m) = 4.33 bar

    MUD Weight (lb/ft) * 0.052 * DP Metal Displacement (bbls/ft)Casing Capacity(bbls/ft) DP Metal Displacement (bbls/ft)

    (psi/ft)Field Unit:

    69

    ll274 (900 f )

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    70/217

    Pressure Drop Pulling Wet Pipe

    Mud Weight = 1,44 kg/liter (12 ppg)

    12 x 0.052 x 0.0254 x 9000.0758 - 0.0254

    = 282 psi

    DP Metal Displacement = 4.01 liter/m ( = 0.00764 bbls/ft)

    DP Capacity = 9.32 l/m (0.01776 bbls/ft)Casing Capacity: = 39.8 liter/m (0.0758 bbls/ft)

    Pressure Drop Pulling Wet Pipe (bar/m) =

    MUD Weight (kg/l) * 0,0981 * DP Closed End Displacement (l/m)Casing Capacity (l/m) DP Closed End Displacement (l/m)

    0711.033.138.39

    33.13*0981.0*44.1(bar/m)

    (bar/m

    Pressure Drop = 0.0711 (bar/m) * 274 (m) = 19.5 bar

    Mud Weight (lb/ft) * 0,052 * DP Closed End Displacement (bbls/ft)Casing Capacity (bbls/ft) DP Closed End Displacement (bbls/ft)

    (psi/ft)

    Field Unit:

    274 m (900 ft)Length of pipe are pulled fromthe hole with no fill-up

    70

    C f Ki k

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    71/217

    Formation fracture can cause lost circulation Can be calculated

    Can be measured Leak-off Test Problem of cavernous, faulted, fissured formations

    of casing shoe

    Causes of KickLost circulation

    71

    SIGNS OF ABNORMAL PRESSURE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    72/217

    SIGNS OF ABNORMAL PRESSURE IN PLASTIC FORMATIONS

    Increase mud returns; kick Verygood (5)

    Drop in circulation pressure - SPM increase: kick Good (4)Increased drilling rate, drilling break : overpressure, kick Good (4)Increased pit level; kick Verygood (5)Change in cutting size; overpressure Good (4)

    Overpulls, torque increase; overpressure Poor (3)d exponent: overpressure Good (4)Connection gas: overpressure Good (4)Trip gas, gas cut mud: overpressure Good (4)

    Mud salinity, resistance: kick Poor (3)MWD (expensive): overpressure, kick Good (5)Shale density: overpressure Good (4)Return flow temperature: overpressure Very poor (2)

    72

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    73/217

    SHUT-IN PROCEDURE

    73

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    74/217

    SHUT-IN THEORY

    Hard or Soft Shut-in : Which is the Best Approach ? Several shut-in procedures in use :

    Variants of "Hard", "Soft Varying preferences results in confused drill crews

    the operator and drilling contractor often haveconflicting procedures for shutting in the well.

    To provide optimum safety of personnel whilemaintaining safety of the well.

    Different well conditions Company policies

    74

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    75/217

    SHUT-IN PROCEDURES

    Hard shut-inAdvantages

    The influx is stopped in the shortest possible time

    Minimises the volume of the influx.

    Simple and quick - there is normally no need to changeany valve alignment.

    The influx is stopped in the shortest possible time

    Lower shut-in casing pressure Lower annular circulation pressures

    Safety of personnel and equipmen t without risk to the well

    75

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    76/217

    SHUT-IN PROCEDURES

    Hard shut-in Disadvantages

    P ressure pulse or water hammer effect is produced inthe well-bore when the BOP is closed.

    To cause possible formation damage.

    Hard Shut-in or Soft Shut-in?

    Depending on the company policy.

    Majority of operators prefer hard shut-in.

    76

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    77/217

    SHUT-IN PROCEDURES

    Soft shut-in

    Advantage:

    Pressure pulse or water hammer effect is notsignificant when the BOP is closed.

    Disadvantages: The influx is stopped in longer time, Larger volume of influx, More complicated - need more steps to shut the well in. Higher shut-in casing pressure Higher circulating pressures

    77

    Hard Shut-in or Soft Shut-in

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    78/217

    Investigate the water hammer effect using a 1430 m test well.

    Hard Shut in or Soft Shut inwater hammer effect (EXAMPLE)

    The pulse amplitudes are 57 psi for the hard shut-in 20 psi in soft shut-in case.

    The effect of the water hammer pulseis even less significant compared tothe normal annular pressure build thanat surface. 78

    Hard Shut-in or Soft Shut-in - water hammer effect (EXAMPLE)

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    79/217

    Why is the amplitude of the pressure pulse so small ? BOP does not close instantly - effective closure time, "Tc . tr is the round trip travel time. The effect is to reduce the pressure wave amplitude by the ratio "tr/Tc 79

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    80/217

    SHUT-IN PROCEDURES

    BOP Closing time (API)All Type of BOP 30 sec

    Except:Big size annular BOP: 18 < BOP size 45 sec

    80

    SHUT IN PROCEDURES

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    81/217

    SHUT-IN PROCEDURESEXAMPLE

    When is a Hard Shut-in Hard ? No reduction in P for tr > Tc :

    BOP closure is very rapid (fast ram operation).

    Hole is very deep. Depth limit for pressure reduction:

    Hole depth < 6750 m (for Tc = 10 s). For the experiment, if there was NO reflected wave :

    P 120 psi P is s t i l l l ess than the f ina l shu t -in p ress ure .

    81

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    82/217

    SHUT-IN PROCEDURES

    Conclusions

    Theory and experiment show small "water hammer"pulse in practical situations.

    SOFT shut-in Little improvement to pressure pulse,

    Significant effect from additional influx.

    HARD shut-in

    Water-hammer" smaller than shut-in pressure rise

    82

    SHUT-IN PROCEDURES

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    83/217

    Possible Questions

    What if contractor disagree on shut-in procedure ?

    Decide at pre-spud meeting .

    Higher mud velocity than during experiment ?

    More important to shut-in rapidly. Pulse is larger but is still likely to be small

    compared to shut-in pressure rise.

    Effect of closing choke in soft shut-in ?

    Lower pressure pulse is produced.

    Effect is a delayed water-hammer .

    83

    Soft shut-inll

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    84/217

    Drilling

    Valve arrangements:

    HCR is closed Choke open valve open to MGSShut-in procedure: Stop rotation - alarm

    Kelly up - space out Tool Joint is not in ram BOP Stop pumps Check for flow If the well flows open HCR

    Close BOP ( usually annular ) Close choke slowly (not considering if SICP exceeds

    MAASP) Record SIDPP, SICP, Pit Gain, Depth

    84

    Soft Shut-inT i i

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    85/217

    Tripping

    Valve arrangements:

    HCR is closed Choke open valve open to MGSShut-in procedure: Space out - TJ not in ram BOP Install the safety valve (kelly cock ) in open position Close safety valve (kelly cock) Flow check If the well flows - Open HCR to remote controlled choke

    Close BOP ( usually annular ) Close choke slowly (not considering if SICP exceeds

    MAASP) Record SIDPP, SICP, Pit gain, Bit Depth

    85

    Hard shut-in procedures

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    86/217

    Hard shut in proceduresDrilling

    Valve arrangements:HCR is closed Choke closed valve open to MGS

    If kick occurs:

    Stop rotation - alarm Kelly up - space out (Tool Joint is not in ram BOP) Stop pumps Check for flow

    If the well flows - Close BOP ( usually annular ) Open HRC Read and record SIDPP, SICP, Pit Gain, Depth

    86

    Hard shut-in procedures

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    87/217

    pTripping

    Valve arrangements:HCR is closed Choke closed valve open to MGS

    If kick occurs: Drill Pipe up - space out - Alarm Install the safety valve (kelly cock) in open position Close safety valve (kelly cock) Flow check If the well flows - Close BOP ( usually annular ) Open HRC to remote controlled choke Read and record SIDPP, SICP, Pit Gain, Depth

    87

    Collect Shut-in Data

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    88/217

    Driller resposibility: Read and record SIDPP, SICP, Pit Gain and Hole Depth

    Properly recording the SIDPP Properly recorded following pressure evolution , Permeability has to allow a proper pressure build up, Not taken too soon or too late, Drill stem must be full of clean mud (large kick).

    Control of Drill stem is full of mud : Pump 10-40 strokes slowly, while SIDPP is constant

    If SIDPP decreases Second pumping for control If SIDPP constant String is full with mud

    Control of trapped pressure

    88

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    89/217

    Low or no SIDPP and SICP

    Pressure gauges are shut off

    No pressure R epeat flow check

    Pressure is too low Float valve in DP

    89

    Measurement of SIDPP and SICP withBack Pressure Valve

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    90/217

    SIDPP

    1) Start the pump with very low pump rate,

    2) Continue check both Drill pipe and Casing pressures

    3) If casing pressure start to increase read drill pipe pressure this is SIDPP.

    90

    Collect Shut-in Data

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    91/217

    Supervisor resposibility:Collect Shut in data from Driller - physically check it!

    SIDPP - m ust checked with evolution

    not just collected from Driller SICP must be collected and checked

    Pit gain - must be collected and checked

    Hole depth - must be collected and checked

    Collect Shut-in Data

    91

    Monitor Bottom Hole Pressure

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    92/217

    Supervisor :

    Instruct Driller to monitor pressure changes on bothgauges, to avoid injection at shoe level.

    Driller must instruct the supervisor befor the annularpressure reach the MAASP

    The Supervisor may or may not ask the driller to bleed off.

    Driller Monitor surface pressures and report to Supervisor. Driller has to do it whether or not he receives instructions

    from Supervisor.

    92

    FORMATION PRESSURE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    93/217

    Formation Pressure = Hydrostatic Pressure + SIDPP

    EXAMPLE:

    MW = 1.44 kg/l (12 ppg)

    TVD = 2895 m (9500 ft)

    SIDPP = 42 bar (600 psi)

    1,44 x 2895 x 0.0981 = 409 bar

    (12 x .052 x 9500 = 5928 psi)

    Formation Pressure = 409 + 42 bar = 451

    (5928 + 600 = 6528 psi)

    600

    psi

    SIDPP=42 bar

    Hydrostatic Pressure in Drillstring

    93

    Kill Mud Weight Well Data:

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    94/217

    gOriginal MW = 1.44 kg/l (12 ppg)

    Well Depth, TVD = 3048 m (10000 ft)

    SIDPP = 42 bar (600 psi)

    Formation Pressure = 473 bar (6528 psi)

    600

    psi

    SIDPP42 bar

    TVD = 3048 m

    = 10000 ft

    0981.0*)m(TVD

    )bar (SIDPP)l/kg(OMW)l/kg(MWKill

    l/kg58.10981.0*3048

    4244.1

    Field un i t :

    052.0*)ft(TVD

    )psi(SIDPP)ppg(OMW)ppg(MWKill

    ppg16.13052.0*10000

    60012

    Kill Mud Weight:

    94

    HEIGHT OF INFLUXDetermine if the influx is below or above the drill collars

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    95/217

    300psi

    600psi

    EXAMPLE 1. EXAMPLE 2.

    1600 litre(10 bbl)

    KICK

    4000 litre(25 bbl)

    KICK

    Determine if the influx is below or above the drill collars

    Volume of Influx to reach the top of DrillCollars = DCOH Capacity x DC Length =

    = 16.8 l/m x 200 m = 3360 litre

    = (0.032 bbls/ft x 656 ft = 21 bbls

    95 m (227 ft)

    Length DPOH = (4000 - 3360)/ 23.3 l/m = 28 m= (25 bbl - 21 bbl/0.044 = 91 ft

    Length of kick = 27 + 200 = 227 m= (656 + 91= 747 ft

    DCOH Capacity: 16.8 liter/m (0.032 bbl/ft)DPOH Capacity: 23.3 liter/m (0.044 bbl/ft)DC Length: 200 m (656 ft)

    28 m (91 ft)

    200 m (656 ft

    Length of kick == 1600 /16,8 l/m = 95 m= (10 bbl/0.044 = 227 ft)

    95

    GRADIENT OF INFLUXInflux Density (kg/l) =

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    96/217

    430 psi 715psi

    SIDPP30 bar

    SICP50 bar

    Height of influx =160 m (525 ft)

    Mud Weight = 1,44 kg/l (12 ppg)

    Well Data:

    Gradient of Influx (bar/m) == 0.166 kg/l x 0.0982 = 0.01628 bar/m

    0981,0x)m(TVDInflux)bar (SIDPP)bar (SICP(

    )l/kg(WeightMud

    l/kg166.00981.0*160

    )3050(44.1

    Field Unit : Influx Density (ppg) =

    Gradient of Influx (bar/m) == 1.56 ppg x 0.052 = 0.0811 psi/ft

    052,0x)ft(TVDInflux))psi(SIDPP)psi(SICP(

    )ppg(WeightMud

    ppg56.1052.0*525

    )430715(12

    96

    Influx Density

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    97/217

    Influx Density

    Densities:Gas 0,18 - 0,36 kg/liter (1,5 - 3 ppg)Oil 0,6 - 0,84 kg/liter (5 - 7 ppg)Salt water 1,03 -1,20 kg/liter (8,6 -10 ppg)

    Gradients:Gas: 0,02 - 0,04 bar/m ( 0.078 0.156 psi/ft)Oil: 0,06 - 0,08 bar/m ( 0.260 0.364 psi/ft) Salt Water: 0,10 - 0,12 bar/m (0.482 0.520 psi/ft)

    Bes t to hand le al l k icks as gas k i ck un t i l show sotherwise .

    97

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    98/217

    SHALLOW GAS CONSIDERATIONS

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    99/217

    SUGGESTED DIVERTING PROCEDURE:

    Space out so that the lower safety valve is above the drillfloor.

    With diverter line open , close shaker valve and diverterpacker.

    Maintain maximum pump rate and pump kill mud ifavailable.

    Shut down all nonessential equipment. Monitor soil around the rig floor for evidence of gas

    breaking out around conductor. If mud reserves run out then continue pumping with any

    fluid. While drilling top hole a float valve should be run .

    99

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    100/217

    GAS BEHAVIOUR

    100

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    101/217

    Gas Migration

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    102/217

    Gas Migration

    Gas migration in an open well: Bottom Hole Pressure DECREASES Gas Bubble Pressure DECREASES Gas Bubble Volume INCREASES

    Gas migration in a closed in well . All Pressures in the Wellbore INCREASE

    Gas Bubble Pressure STAYS THE SAME Gas Bubble Volume STAYS THE SAME

    102

    Understanding Gas Behaviour

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    103/217

    Understanding Gas Behaviour

    You should be familiar with Boyles Gas Law .

    (P1 x V1 ) = (P2 x V2)

    The Ps stand for pressure and the Vs stand for volume. The P1 and V1 apply before any change has taken place.

    The P2 , V2 apply after any change.

    103

    Uncontrolled Expansion

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    104/217

    The gas bubble gets bigger,

    It pushes more and more fluid out of the hole, The hydrostatic pressure of this mud is also lost,

    The result is that BHP will drop,

    This cause an under-balance and the influxentering the hole.

    A1 bbls

    B?? bbls

    C353 bbls

    Bottomhole Pressure (BHP)353 bar

    (5,200 PSI)

    (P1 x V1 ) = (P2 x V2)

    (353 bar x 1 bbl) = (1 bar x V2) V2 = 353 bbl

    104

    Gas Migration in Closed Well

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    105/217

    Gas Bubble is at the Bottom Hol e

    800 liter (5 bbl) influx at Bottom Hole At the gas bubble the pressure is equal

    to Hydrostatic Pressure (HP)

    Mud Weight 1,2 kg/liter (10 ppg)

    TVD = 3000 m (10000 psi)

    HP = 0,0981 * 1,2 * 3000 = 353 bar(HP = 0,052 * 10 * 10000 = 5200 psi)

    GAS 353 bar

    (5,200 PSI)

    800 liter(5 bbls)

    Casing Shoe

    1,2 kg/liter(10 ppg)

    Mud

    Choke

    3000 m (10,000 feet)105

    Gas Migration in Closed WellGas Bubble at the Surface

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    106/217

    Gas Bubble at the Surface

    Choke (closed)

    BOP (Closed)

    353 bar (5,200 PSI)Gas pressure

    +353 bar (5,200 PSI)

    Hydrostatic Pressure

    The gas migrate to surface

    (p1*V1 =p2*V2)

    Gas volume unchanged in closed system =

    = 800 liter, (5 bbl)

    Gas Volume at Bottom = Gas Volume atSurface

    Gas Press. at Bottom = Gas Press. at Surface

    Gas Press. at Surface = 353 bar (5200 psi)

    BHP =

    = Gas Press. at Surface + Hydrostatic Press.

    = 353 bar (5200 psi) + 353 bar (5200 psi) =

    = 706 bar (10400 psi) BHP=706 bar(10400 psi) 106

    Maximum Surface Pressure

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    107/217

    When a gas kick is circulated to the surface, its volume will expand .

    The gas will achieve its maximum volume at the surface .

    Annular surface pressure depends on:

    Greater underbalance

    Larger vol ume of the kick Higher surface pressure

    Lower density of the influx Annulus becomes smaller

    Hole depth increases Pressures increase

    Mud density increases

    Circulating the kick with kill mud Lower surface pressures

    Gas percolation in closed well Surface pressures close to FP

    107

    Gas Migration Rate

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    108/217

    g

    Gas Migration Rate (m/h) =Example:

    SICP Increase in 1 hour = 20 bar (286 psi);Mud Weight = 1.44 kg/l (12 ppg)

    Gas Migration Rate =

    10.2l)eight kg/ud

    bar/h)ICPnhange

    h410. 21.44 kg/l)

    bar/h)0

    Field u ni t :

    Gas Migration Rate = 0.052*g)Weight(ppMud(psi/h)SICPinChange

    ht580.0522 ppg)

    psi/h)86

    108

    Gas Migration Rate

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    109/217

    Gas migration rate:

    In water based mud: Average 0,5-5 m/min In salt water: 10-20 m/min in salt waterIn Oil based mud:

    Methane dissolves in oil base mud 20-40 m /m Difficult the kick detection Large gas influx lower change in pit volume,

    lower SICP.

    When the influx is circulated up the wellbore No likely expansion , Rapid expansion at bubble point near to surface .

    109

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    110/217

    CIRCULATION and WELL CONTROL

    110

    Circulation and Well Control

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    111/217

    Circulation and Well Control

    Goals: Circulate kick out,

    Pump kill mud in the hole,

    Maintain constant BHP equal or slightly higher thanFormation Pressure,

    Accurate SPM control,

    Kill Sheet Calculation ,

    111

    Kill Rate KRReduced circulation

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    112/217

    Reduced circulation Advantages :

    Lower annulus friction pressure, Reduced risk of pump breakdown,

    More time to react problems,

    Reduced gas rates through mud-gas separator, Keeping within the capability of barite mixing system

    Allows choke to work:

    Proper orifice range,

    Less pressure fluctuation in response to a change inchoke setting.

    Normally 1/3 to 1/2 of normal drilling circulation rate112

    Kill Rate Pressure (KRP)

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    113/217

    113

    KRP must be measured for both pumps and recorded indaily report and kill sheet:

    Every tour by each driller ( at least in every shift )

    When the pumps are repaired or liners changed

    If mud properties are changed

    Every 100 m (300 feet) of hole drilled

    When the BHA changed

    When bit nozzles are changed

    Must be verified before well killing

    Kill Rate Pressure (KRP) Calculation

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    114/217

    Kill Rate Pressure (KRP) Calculation

    New Pump Pressure with New Pump Rate approximate (bar):

    Example: Old Pump Pressure: 200 bar (2862 psi)Old Pump Rate: 90 strks/minNew Pump Rate: 40 strks/min

    2

    )(strks/minRatePumpOld)(strks/minRatePumpNew

    x)Press.(bar PumpOld(bar)Press.PumpNew

    bar 5.39)(strks/min90

    in)40(strks/mx200(bar)PressurePumpNew

    2

    psi565)(strks/min90

    in)40(strks/mx2862(psi)PressurePumpNew

    2

    Field Unit:

    114

    Kill Rate Pressure (KRP) Calculation

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    115/217

    Kill Rate Pressure (KRP) Calculation

    New Pump Pressure with New Mud weight (bar):

    Example:

    Old Pump Pressure: 100 bar (1430 psi)New Mud Weight: 1,44 kg/liter (12 ppg)Old Mud Weight: 1,12 kg/liter (10.4 ppg)

    (kg/l)WeightMudOld(kg/l)WeightMudNew

    xar)Pressure(bPumpOld(bar)PressurePumpNew

    ar b115(kg/l)1.25(kg/l)1.44

    x(bar)100 PressurempNew

    Field unit:

    sip1650(ppg)10.4

    (ppg)12x(psi)1430 PressurePumpNew

    115

    Initial Circulation Pressure (ICP)

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    116/217

    ICP Calculation:ICP = Kill Pump Rate Pressure (bar) + SIDPP (bar)

    Example:Kill Pump Rate Pressure (KRP): 52 bar (750 psi)Shut-in Drill Pipe Pressures (SIDPP): 14 bar (200 psi)

    ICP (bar) = 52 + 14 = 66 ba r

    Field Unit: ICP = 750 + 200 = 950 psi

    116

    Final Circulation Pressure (FCP)

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    117/217

    OMW increase to KMW Circulation pressure decrease

    Final Circulation Pressure, FCP (bar) =

    = Kill Pump Rate Pressure (bar) x

    Example: Kill Pump Rate Pressure: 100 bar (1430 psi)Kill Mud Weight: 1,44 kg/lit er (12 ppg)Original Mud Weight: 1,12 kg/liter (10.4 ppg)

    )l/kg(WeightMudOriginal)l/kg(WeightMudNew

    r ba115(kg/l)1.25(kg/l)1.44

    x(bar)100 (FCP)PressurenCirculatioinal

    psi1650(ppg)10.4

    (ppg)12x(psi)(1430 (FCP)PressurenCirculatioFinal

    Field unit:

    117

    Hole Volume CalculationP S k d Ti

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    118/217

    Pump Strokes and Time

    Surface to Bit (Drill String) Drill Pipe (DP)

    Heawy Wall Drill Pipe (HWDP)

    Drill Collar (DC) Bit to Surface (Total Annulus Volume)

    Bit to Casing Shoe (Open Hole)

    DC OH DP/HWDP OH

    Casing Shoe to Surface (DP Casing)

    118

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    119/217

    WELL CONTROL METHODS

    119

    Maintenance of Primary Well Controlhil D illi d Ci l ti

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    120/217

    while Drilling and Circulating

    1. Ensure Mud weight correct.

    2. Ensure pit level recorders are operational.

    3. Any change inform Driller.

    4. When a drilling break, take flow check .

    5. Maintain accurate records.

    120

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    121/217

    Secondary Well Control

    121

    KILL METHODS

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    122/217

    Objectives of Well Control Methods

    Circulate the kick safely out of the well

    Re-establish primary well control by restoring hydrostatic balance

    Avoid additional kicks Avoid excessive pressures that may fracture the weak zone andinduce an underground blowout

    122

    Well Control Methods

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    123/217

    Drillers Method Wait and Weight Method

    Concurrent Method

    Volumetric Method Bullheading

    Reverse Circulation Method

    1-2 most often used.

    123

    Differences

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    124/217

    At drillers method

    Kick circulated with Original Mud . Kill Mud circulated in second step.

    At W W method

    Kick circulated with Kill Mud.

    At concurrent method

    Mud Weigh increased in steps by step . New mud circulated down.

    Circulating pressures recalculated.

    124

    Secondary Well ControlWell Control Methods String on Bottom

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    125/217

    Well Control Methods String on Bottom

    WAIT & WEIGHT - Applied universally as first choice

    DRILLERS - Applied in highly deviated / horizontal wells & by mostoperators in most applications worldwide . SIMPLE!

    CONCURRENT - Applied by some operators who still prefer toDrillers method. Pumping weighted mud can start any time.

    BULLHEAD - Applied when conditions dictate (fractured formations)

    REVERSE - Applied as primary method in workover operation.

    VOLUMETRIC When string is plugged or circulation not possible

    125

    Secondary Well ControlThree Rules for Well Killing

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    126/217

    Three Rules for Well Killing

    Rule 1Keep BHP Formation Pressure

    Rule 2Special cases annular friction loss is considered.

    Rule 3Once the kick is below the casing shoe , the MAASP the criticalfactors for well killing.Once the kick is inside the casing , the pressure rating of surfaceequipment become critical factors for well killing.

    126

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    127/217

    Drillers Method

    127

    DRILLERS METHOD

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    128/217

    DRILLERS METHOD

    Viable option if barite was unavailable/limited

    Mixing equipment limitations means long waiting time

    Less chance of gas migration

    Circulation begins right away

    Weather may be a consideration

    Fewer calculations at start of operation

    Consideration to select the Drillers Method

    128

    DRILLERS METHOD

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    129/217

    DRILLERS METHOD

    Well under pressure longest with two circulation's

    Under certain circumstances the highest shoe pressures

    Standpipe pressure the highest for the longest time

    Annular surface pressure the highest

    Consideration do not select the Drillers Method

    129

    Drillers Method

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    130/217

    Method

    130

    Drillers MethodProcedure

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    131/217

    Procedure

    Kick occurs, shut-in the well by the operator's/contractor's procedure

    Record SIDPP, SICP, Pit gain

    Complete the Kill Sheet

    Some information are pre-recorded

    Start circulation

    Open choke start up pump to kill rate

    SICP hold constant by choke (BHP is constant)

    131

    Drillers MethodProcedure

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    132/217

    Pump at constant Kill Rate

    ICP remain constant by choke Circulate kick out

    ICP = KRP + SIDPP = Constant

    If kick pumped out

    Stop the pump, close the choke

    Casing Pressure = SIDPP

    Kill Mud Circulation

    Open choke, bring pump to Kill Pump Rate

    Casing pressure keep constant

    132

    Drillers MethodProcedure

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    133/217

    While Kill Mud fill-up the drill string

    ICP decrease to FCP

    Kill Mud at the bit

    Stop the pump, close the choke

    Observe casing and drill pipe pressureCasing Pressure = SIDPP

    SIDPP = 0

    Start the pump

    Open choke, bring pump to Kill Pump Rate

    Casing pressure keep constant

    133

    Drillers MethodProcedure

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    134/217

    Circulate until Kill Mud appears at the choke

    Constant pump rate

    Circulation pressure = FCP

    Stop pump

    close the choke keeping casing pressure constant Observe the pressures

    Casing Pressure = Drill Pipe Pressure 0

    Bleed off the trapped pressure through choke

    Flow check through choke

    If the well flows a dditional circulation.

    134

    Drillers Method

    P(bar)

    ICP= 71

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    135/217

    SP= 10+

    KPP= 28

    + FCP= 31 SIDPP= 33

    Drillers MethodP(bar)

    MAASP 3 = 134 MAASP 2 = 73 LOT

    LOT = 100

    Pa max = 92SIDPP= 33

    SICP= 45

    2033 870 1586 3619

    4008

    4877 Ote`avanje 6463

    Pump (strks/m,in)

    135

    Drillers Method

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    136/217

    Advantages

    Simple calculations E asy to learn

    Circulation start immediately

    Limited problems

    Stuck pipe

    Plugging

    Migration

    Disadvantages

    High surface casing pressure

    High casing shoe pressure mud loss

    Longer time of circulation.

    136

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    137/217

    Wait & Weight Method

    137

    WAIT & WEIGHT METHOD

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    138/217

    WAIT & WEIGHT METHOD

    One circulation:

    lesss time on the choke and equipment is under pressure

    In some circumstances lower casing shoe pressures

    With a long open hole section less chance of lost circulation

    Reduces pressures on standpipe side quickly

    Consideration to select the W&W Method

    138

    WAIT AND WEIGHT METHOD

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    139/217

    WAIT AND WEIGHT METHOD

    Gas migration may become a problem while waiting on kill mud

    Hole problems due to cuttings settling while waiting on kill mud

    Cooling down period could induce hydrate formation.

    Consideration do not select the W&W Method

    139

    Wait & Weight Method

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    140/217

    140

    Wait & Weight Method Procedure

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    141/217

    Procedure

    Kick occurs, shut-in the well by the operator's/contractor's procedure Record SIDPP, SICP, Pit gain

    Complete the Kill Sheet

    Some information are pre-recorded Start Kill Mud Circulation

    Open choke, bring pump to Kill Pump Rate

    SICP hold constant by choke (BHP is constant).

    141

    Wait & Weight Method Procedure

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    142/217

    Procedure

    While Kill Mud fill - up the drill string

    Constant Kill Rate

    Follow the Drill Pipe Pressure Plot

    ICP decrease to FCP

    Kill Mud at the bit

    Stop the pump, close the choke

    Observe casing and drill pipe pressure

    Drill Pipe Pressure = 0

    Casing Pressure SICP

    142

    Wait & Weight MethodProcedure

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    143/217

    Circulate until Kill Mud appears at the choke

    Constant pump rate

    Circulation pressure = FCP

    Stop pump

    close the choke keeping casing pressure constant

    Observe the pressures

    Casing Pressure = Drill Pipe Pressure 0

    Bleed off the trapped pressure through choke

    Flow check through choke

    If the well flows a dditional circulation.143

    Secondary Well ControlWait & Weight & Drillers Methods

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    144/217

    Phase 1

    P DP

    P ST

    P C1

    P C2

    P C2

    Standpipe Pressure for Drillers Method

    Standpipe Pressurefor W&W Method

    W&W: Well killed atend of Phase I inside thedrill string

    SIDPP

    .. due to change in mud

    due to constant mud

    144

    Wait & Weight Method

    Di d

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    145/217

    Disadvantages:

    Circulation can not start immediately. Long time to Wait & Weight- up the mud. Problems occures: Gas migration, Stuck pipe,

    Downhole plugging.

    Advantages: Kill Mud is present at the bottom before kick removed

    through the choke. Lower surface casing pressure.

    Lower casing shoe pressure at long openholesection (Volume surface to bit Openhole Volume).

    Shorter time of circulation.

    145

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    146/217

    Volumetric Method

    146

    VOLUMETRIC METHOD

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    147/217

    Volumetric Method is applied to a well if the hole conditionis having one of the followings:1. Circulation is not possible

    String is out of the hole, String is plugged, Pump is shut-down or unavailable and there is a float valve in the

    string.2. Circulation is not recommended

    Bit is off bottom above the TVD; Stripping to bottom is not possible,

    3. Bullheading is not possible

    147

    VOLUMETRIC METHOD APPLICATION

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    148/217

    The Volumetric Method Application has the same concept ofConstant Bottom Hole Pressure Technique as the other wellcontrol methods have.

    Choke manifold is connected to the Trip Tank.

    Some pre-calculated amount of drilling mud is bled off from themanual choke for a selected pressure increase (working pressure)at every cycle.

    BHP maintains constant because

    BHP = SICP + HPmud

    148

    VOLUMETRIC METHOD APPLICATION

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    149/217

    Volumetric Method Application has the same concept of ConstantBottom Hole Pressure Technique as the other well control methodshave.

    Choke manifold is connected to the Trip Tank.

    Some pre-calculated amount of drilling mud is bled off from themanual choke for a selected pressure increase (working pressure)at every cycle.

    149

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    150/217

    150

    VOLUMETRIC METHOD APPLICATION

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    151/217

    The following straightforward formula is used for the Volumetric

    Well Control:Volume To Be Bled ( liter) =

    Pressure Increase (bar) x Hole or Annular Capacity (liter/m)

    Mud Gradient (bar/m)=

    Volume To Be Bled:(liter or bbl)

    Mud volume to be bled from the manual chokeat every cycle.

    Pressure Increase:(bar or psi)

    Selected working pressure on the casing gaugefor every cycle.

    Hole or Annular Capacity:(liter/m or bbl/ft)

    Capacity of the place where gas influx islocated in the hole.

    Mud Gradient:(bar/m or psi/ft)

    Drilling mud gradient in use.

    151

    VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    152/217

    WELL CONFIGURATION:

    After pulling out of the hole a kick is taken and the well is shut-in byblind rams. Formation influx is gas The kick has occurred because of the Trip Margin . The bullheading method was not possible due to the week formation at

    the casing shoe. It is decided to use the volumetric method to control bottom hole

    pressure as the influx migrates.

    This will be done by using the followings:Safety margin 200 psiWorking pressure 100 psi

    152

    VOLUMETRIC METHOD KILL EXERCISEWELL DATA

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    153/217

    MD/TVD: 5600 ft

    9-5/8 casing shoe : 3950 ft

    Open hole capacity: 0.0702 bbl/ft (hole capacity is constant)

    Casing capacity: 0.0702 bbl/ft (hole capacity is constant)

    Mud density in use: 12.6 ppg (0.655 psi/ft)Gas hydrostatic pressure: 25 psi (sabit)

    Influx volume 12.6 bbl

    Formation pressure (Pf) 3670 psi

    SIDPP 0 psi (drill string is out of the hole)

    SICP 100 psi

    153

    T100BOP

    CLOSED

    SICP= 100 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISE

    MANUALCHOKE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    154/217

    T100CLOSED

    SICP= 100 psi (is stabilized casing pressure)BHP = Formation Pressure (3670 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    P (psi) x Ca (bbl/ft) V (bbl)

    MG (psi/ft)=

    .

    V (bbl): Mud volume to be bled from the manual choke at every cycle.P (psi): Selected working pressure on the casing gauge for every cycleCa (bbl/ft): Capacity of the place where gas influx is located in the hole.

    MG (psi/ft): Drilling mud gradient in use.

    154

    T100BOP

    Closed

    SICP= 100 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISE

    MANUALCHOKE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    155/217

    T100Closed

    SICP= 100 psiBHP = Formation Pressure (3670 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    At the given example :

    Safety Margin = 200 psi

    Working Pressure (P) = 100 psi is selected

    100 (psi) x 0.0702 (bbl/ft)V (bbl) 0.655 (psi/ft)=

    = 10.7 bbls = 11 bbls !!

    155

    T400BOP

    CLOSED

    CP= 400 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISE

    MANUALCHOKE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    156/217

    T400CLOSED

    CP = 400 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi (3970 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Casing Pressure = 400 psi,

    BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    156

    T400

    CP= 400 psi

    MANUALCHOKE

    VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISE

    BOPCLOSED

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    157/217

    T400

    CP= 400 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Casing Pressure = 400 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    11 bbl

    To maintain the BHP 200 psi higher than Formation Pressure, Casing Pressure is held constant at 400 psi by Manual Choke

    until 11 bbls mud is bled off into the Trip Tank.

    157

    T500

    CP = 500 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISEBOP

    CLOSEDMANUALCHOKE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    158/217

    T

    CP= 500 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi (3970 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Casing Pressure = 500 psi,

    BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    11 bbl

    158

    T500

    CP = 500 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISEBOP

    CLOSEDMANUALCHOKE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    159/217

    T500

    CP= 500 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Casing Pressure = 500 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi olur.

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    22 bbl

    To maintain the BHP 200 psi higher than FormationPressure,

    Casing Pressure is held constant at 500 psi by ManualChoke until 11 bbls mud is bled off into the Trip Tank.

    159

    T600

    CP = 600 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISEBOP

    CLOSEDMANUALCHOKE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    160/217

    T600

    CP= 600 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi (3970 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Casing Pressure = 600 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.22 bbl

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    160

    T600

    CP = 600 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISEBOP

    CLOSEDMANUALCHOKE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    161/217

    T

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Casing Pressure = 600 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.33 bbl

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    CP= 600 psiBHP = Formastion Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)

    To maintain the BHP 200 psi higher than Formation Pressure, Casing Pressure is held constant at 600 psi by Choke until

    11 bbls mud is bled off into the Trip Tank.

    161

    T700

    CP = 700 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISEBOP

    CLOSEDMANUALCHOKE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    162/217

    T

    CP= 600 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi (3970 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Casing Pressure = 700 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.33 bbl

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    162

    T700

    CP = 700 psi VOLUMETRIC METHODKILL EXERCISEBOP

    CLOSEDMANUALCHOKE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    163/217

    T

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Casing Pressure = 700 psi,BHP = Formation Pressure + 300 psi.44 bbl

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    CP= 700 psiBHP = Formastion Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)

    To maintain the BHP 200 psi higher than Formation Pressure, Casing Pressure is held constant at 700 psi by Choke until

    11 bbls mud is bled off into the Trip Tank.

    163

    1000

    VOLUMETRIC METHOD KILL EXERCISE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    164/217

    900

    800

    700

    600

    500

    400

    300

    200100

    997766554433114433221100

    22 88

    C a s

    i n g

    P r e s s u r e

    ( p s i )

    Bled Volume (bbl)

    Start the LUBRICATE & BLEEDTECHNIQUE

    Gas at surfaceWhen gas reaches the surface casingPressure does not increase any more.

    164

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    165/217

    LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUE

    165

    LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    166/217

    Lubricate and Bleed Technique is the next stage of VolumetricMethod.

    During the application of this procedure, Constant Bottom HolePressure Technique is applied to the well as used in the othermethods.

    First mud is pumped through the kill line into the well and then gas isbled off from the manual choke to decrease the well head pressure.

    166

    VOLUMETRIC METHOD APPLICATION

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    167/217

    The formula is used for the Volumetric Well Control:

    Volume To Be Pumped ( liter) =

    Pressure Decrease (bar) x Well or Annular Capacity (liter/m)

    Mud Gradient (bar/m)=

    Volume To Be Pumped:(liter or bbl)

    Mud volume to be pumped pumped for theselected pressure decrease.

    Pressure Decrease:(bar or psi)

    Selected pressure decrease on the casingpressure.

    Well or Annular Capacity:(liter/m or bbl/ft)

    Well or annulus capacity where gas located inbelow the BOP.

    Mud Gradient:(bar/m or psi/ft)

    Gradient of the mud to be pumped into the well.

    167

    T700BOP

    CLOSED

    CP = 700 psi

    MANUALCHOKE

    MUD INLET

    LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    168/217

    T

    CP= 700 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Surface equipment are lined up.

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    GAS OUTLETKILL LINE

    MUD INLET

    168

    T750BOP

    CLOSED

    CP = 750 psi

    MANUALCHOKEMUD INLET

    LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    169/217

    T

    CP= 750 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 350 psi (4020 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Surface equipment are lined up.

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    GAS OUTLETKILL LINE

    11 bbls kill mud is pumped into the well Then 10 to 15 minutes is waited for mud-gas separation. CP increases because of the gas compression. In this example, CP = 700+50 = 750 psi.

    169

    T600BOP

    CLOSED

    CP = 600 psi

    MANUALCHOKEMUD INLET

    LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    170/217

    T

    CP= 600 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Surface equipment are lined up.

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    GAS OUTLET

    KILL LINE

    CP is decreased to 600 psi by bleeding gas fromthe manual choke.

    170

    T675BOP

    CLOSED

    CP = 675 psi

    MANUALCHOKEMUD INLET

    LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    171/217

    T

    CP= 675 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 375 psi (4045 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Surface equipment are lined up.

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    GAS OUTLETKILL LINE

    11 bbls kill mud is pumped into the well Then 10 to 15 minutes is waited for mud-gas separation. CP increases because of the gas compaction. In this example, CP = 600+75 = 675 psi.

    171

    T500BOP

    CLOSED

    CP = 500 psi

    MANUALCHOKE

    GAS OUTLETMUD INLET

    LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    172/217

    CP= 500 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 200 psi (3870 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Surface equipment are lined up.

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    GAS OUTLET

    KILL LINE

    CP is decreased to 500 psi by bleeding gas fromthe manual choke.

    172

    T0

    CP = 0 psi

    Surface equipment are lined up as

    LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISEBOP

    CLOSEDMUD INLET

    MANUALCHOKE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    173/217

    CP= 0 psiBHP = Formation Pressure

    Surface equipment are lined up asshown in the figure at left.

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    KILL LINECHOKE LINE

    GAS OUTLET

    TRIPTANK

    Lubricate & Bleed Technique is applied tothe well at every cycle by pumping 11 bblsmud into the well and bleeding gas for theequivalent 100 psi pressure decrease untilthe CP = 0 psi.

    Mud volume to be pumped into the hole and the propercasing pressure decrease will may be lowered at thefollowing cycles. For example: 5.5 bbls mud is pumped

    and then CP is decreased by 50 psi.

    173

    T0BOP

    CLOSED

    CP = 675 psi

    MANUALCHOKEMUD INLET

    LUBRICATE & BLEED TECHNIQUEKILL EXERCISE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    174/217

    CP= 675 psiBHP = Formation Pressure + 375 psi (4045 psi)

    TRIP TANK

    CHOKE LINE

    Mud Density = 12.6 ppgMud Gradient = 0.655 psi/ft

    Surface equipment are lined up.

    Safety Margin = 200 psiWorking Pressure (P) = 100 psi

    GAS OUTLETKILL LINE

    11 bbls kill mud is pumped into the well Then 10 to 15 minutes is waited for mud-gas separation. CP increases because of the gas compaction. In this example, CP = 600+75 = 675 psi.

    174

    1000

    VOLUMETRIC METHOD and BLEED & LUBRICATE TECHNIQUE

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    175/217

    900

    800

    700

    600

    500

    400

    300

    200100

    997766554433114433221100

    VOLUMETRICMETHOD

    LUBRICATE & BLEEDTECHNIQUE

    22

    88

    C a s

    i n g P

    r e s s u r e

    ( p s i )

    Bled Volume (bbl) Pumped Volume (bbl)

    Gas at surface

    Gas is Out OfThe Well

    175

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    176/217

    Concurrent Method

    176

    Procedure for Concurrent method

    Well is closed in

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    177/217

    Well is closed-in,Basic information recordedCalculate kill sheet Calculate ICP, FCP, MW, strokes

    Start the pump, bring up to KRSICP constantWhen pump is at KR Control ICP

    When circulatingMud mixing personnel call up MW each time when it is readyWhen MW is pumping from surface to bit the choke operatoradjust the pressure by the graph.

    Continue circulating untilKMW reaches to chokeWell is killed Flow check

    177

    Weight-up considerations Using Driller s, W&W, concurrent method

    Th d b i h d ( i ) KWM

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    178/217

    The mud must be weighted up (continue) to KWM.

    Barite is the best weighting material Important to know required number of sacks

    2W35

    1W2W1470=SX

    W1 - initial MW - ppg W 2 - desired MW - ppg

    SX - sacks of barite to 100 bbl of mud

    Vi volume increase bbl N number of sacks

    9,14 NVi

    178

    Example

    2 2 2

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    179/217

    W1 = 12,2 ppg W 2 = 12,7 ppg

    SX = 33 sacks to 100 bbl mud 100 lb/sack

    Vmud - m 3 KWM, OMW - kg/liter

    By the practice

    Barite (t) =KWM2,4

    OMWKWMV2,4

    mud 2,4

    BV ti

    179

    CONCURRENT METHOD

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    180/217

    Most complicated

    More record keeping

    Higher casing pressure than W&W method (gas kick)

    Complicated mud mixing - weighted up in a series steps

    Weighting time - circulation time need But max CSG pressure less than at Driller s method.

    180

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    181/217

    LOW CHOKE-PRESSURE METHOD

    181

    LOW CHOKE-PRESSURE METHOD

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    182/217

    SICP rises while circulating

    But BHP is constant

    Decrease SICP is safer?

    Reduce BHP - new kick

    Some cases low choke method is usable

    Employed areas of underbalanced drilling

    182

    LOW CHOKE-PRESSURE METHOD

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    183/217

    Drill tight low permeability formations Operator must be familiar Crew continue drilling

    Underbalanced Keep high ROP Avoid damaging of fractured formations

    Influx must be low Operator must have a good practice

    Know the characteristics

    SICP must be lower than limitations

    183

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    184/217

    Unusual Well Control Operation

    184

    Annulus Pressure with Influx on Bottom

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    185/217

    holeof bottomonInfluxof Volume1Vholeof bottomatPressure1P

    P o

    H i n f l u x

    influx

    mudluxluxOtop inf inf

    :Influxof topatPressure

    luxHWellDmudtopPChokeP inf

    :Chokeat Pressure

    luxHShoeDWellDmudtopPShoeP inf

    :Shoeat Pressure

    185

    Bottom of Influx at a known depth

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    186/217

    P o

    H i n f l u

    x

    P Bottom

    P Top

    X

    *luxinf WellmudtopChokeHXDPP

    mud

    XO

    P BottomP2P

    2

    11

    112

    22112V

    PP

    VZTPZTP

    V

    AnnulusCapluxH 2

    V

    *inf

    luxlux

    HbottomPtopP inf *inf

    Shoeluxinf WellmudtopShoe DHXDPP *

    186

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    187/217

    Reverse Circulation

    188

    Reverse Circulation

    R l d i D illi O ti b id d

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    188/217

    Rarely used in Drilling Operations may be considered anoption in case of a weak shoe.

    Common practise when killing a production well for aworkover - in cased hole.

    In a reverse circulation kill, the fluid is pumped down thecompletion annulus and returns are taken up thecompletion .

    The control of the operation is again by adjustment of thechoke opening on the line from the completion/tree.

    It has the great advantage of filling the tubing and annuluswith kill fluid in one operation.

    As the kill fluid enters the completion, there is a probabilitythat gas will be encouraged to enter the kill fluid as it ispumped up the completion . 189

    Reverse Circulation

    Tubingpressure

    Packer fluid is not same then the killing fluid.

    Tubing draw-down pressure is controlled by the choke .

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    189/217

    Annuluspressure

    Start the circulation

    Tubing

    strks

    Pressure (bar)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    0 500 800 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000

    Tubing pressure draw-down chart

    Tubing

    Gas circulate out through Tubing

    Packer fluid circulte through Tubing

    Kill Fluid fill up the tubing

    SITP

    Tubing and annulus volume (strks)190

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    190/217

    Blocked Nozzles

    191

    Post Kick Calculations Blocked Nozzles

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    191/217

    Sudden rise on PC1 with no effect on Pchoke DP pressure loss will increase without effecting BHP Most likely around time 2 mud reaches bit if poor mixing

    occursProcedure:

    Shut In well and check all is OK, record P DP* Start to pump holding Pchoke constant. Drillers Method

    Continue holding PST* constant Wait & Weight Method

    Determine P C* (=PST* - PDP*) Determine the additional pressure due to blocked nozzles

    (PC*-PC) Replot kill graph using this additional back pressure.

    192

    Secondary Well Control

    Dealing with Blocked Nozzles (W&W)P *

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    192/217

    Phase 1

    PDP*

    PDP

    PST*

    PST

    PC*

    PC

    PC*-PCPC1

    PC2

    PC2*

    PC*-PC

    193

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    193/217

    Losses above a Pressure Zone

    194

    Kicks & Losses - Losses above a Pressure Zone

    G Ki k Sh B kd I l Bl

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    194/217

    Gas Kick Shoe Breakdown Internal Blowout

    Initial P BH = TVDH x mud PBH after kick = P O = Initial P BH + PDP Initial P Shoe = TVDCsg x mud

    PShoe after kick = Initial P Shoe + PAnn Initial Influx Height = (P Ann PDP) (mud infl) As shoe breaks down, crossflow from reservoir to

    loss zone will occur. At high rates this will cause

    drawdown on the reservoir, reducing near well-bore P O ( PBH Flowing ).

    0

    195

    Kicks & Losses - Losses above a Pressure ZonePAnnP DP

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    195/217

    mud gas

    P FS

    P O

    196

    Losses above a Pressure zone Development of an Internal BlowoutP

    AnnP DP

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    196/217

    0

    mud gas

    P FOP FP P UF

    Drawdown

    Q increasing

    197

    Losses above a Pressure zone Annulus Siphoned Empty of Mud

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    197/217

    0

    P FOP FP

    P UF

    Q increasing

    Q increasing

    Drawdown

    Siphoning out Siphoning out

    198

    Losses above a Pressure zone - Resolution

    Final situation can cause high casing pressures at surface

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    198/217

    Pump water or low density mud down the annulus mud < fracture propagation pressure Keeps gas out of csg, reduces surface pressures

    Keep drillstring full if possible

    Increases BPH and reduced production rate Prevents nozzles plugging Prevents ingress of gas into drillstring

    Attempt to cure losses by pumping LCM Beware proppant effect in fractures Consider pumping gunk (diesel / barites) down annulus &

    water down string199

    Losses above a Pressure zone - Resolution

    If unable to cure losses: Prepare heavy mud with density:

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    199/217

    Prepare heavy mud with density:

    CSGH

    losses.aboveCSGO*M DD

    DP

    When ready, pump 2 x OH Annulus volume down DP Displace to bit with 1 mud

    This should reduce the influx rate and,assuming only one loss zone, should killwell.

    200

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    200/217

    Losses above a Pressure zone Resolution

    201

    Losses above a Pressure zone - Resolution

    If losses are cured

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    201/217

    Indicated by increase in P DP and P Ann Prepare kill mud based on estimated P O Monitor P DP as gas migrates into the csg from OH annulus

    Keep P BH constant by keeping P DP constant Consider displacing gas using Drillers method

    Displace well to new mud gradient using Weight & waitmethod.

    Will be necessary to isolate loss zone (and much of OH section)behind casing before drilling ahead.

    202

    Kicks & Losses - Losses below a Pressure zone

    If loss zone penetrated below a pressure zone. x

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    202/217

    DGas

    DH

    flowstart towillthen wellP

    LossesafterSandGasatPressure

    SandGasat pressuremudInitial

    can takeformationloss that pressureMaxInitial

    Gas Mud Gas

    Mud Gas

    Mud Gas

    Mud H

    Mud H BH

    X D If

    X D Mud

    D

    X D D P

    If no action is taken. Levels in DP and annulus will drop, If overbalance is lost gas influx will occur,

    Gas will percolate up and down, As gas rises in annulus, mud will be displaced until

    flow is seen at surface, Well would then be closed in.

    203

    Losses below a Pressure zone Development of Internal Blowout

    When well is shut in Gas migration up the annulus if not allowed to

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    203/217

    Gas migration up the annulus if not allowed toexpand will increase P BH leading to morelosses.

    Gas will flip with mud causing casing to befilled with gas.

    Eventually whole well may become displacedto gas.

    Surface pressure will rise to close to theFlowing P O of the gas zone.

    An internal blowout will occur with the lowerzone becoming supercharged.

    DGas

    DH204

    Losses below a Pressure zoneImmediate Response

    On observing losses:

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    204/217

    1. Keep annulus full if possible Pump mud and then water Will reduce drawdown on producing interval

    mWGZwWGZ

    wmWHmPZ

    CSGxDPW

    HDHPdrawdownZoneGasHDPPressurePorezoneLoss

    CapV

    H

    :lossesobservingafterwaterof bblVwithfilledisholeIf

    205

    Losses below a Pressure zone Resolution

    1. Attempt to cure losses down the drillstring with LCM Use circulating sub if installed

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    205/217

    g

    Beware plugging bit nozzles2. Minimum nozzle size when pumping LCM: 14/32

    If LCM unsuccessful consider: Diesel / Bentonite gunk pill Thixomix (flash setting) cement Cement / LCM combinations

    3. After curing losses:1. Set cement plug across / above loss zone2. Displace well back to 1 mud3. Set casing / drilling liner to isolate producing zone4. Drill ahead.

    206

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    206/217

    Horizontal Well Control

    207

    Horizontal Holes

    M h i l ll d ill d f d l h

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    207/217

    Most horizontal wells are drilled for development as ratherthan for exploration reasons.

    Well control in these situations might not be regarded ascritical as:

    Reservoir behaviour / pressure is well known Mud weight generally selected to provide overbalance and

    maintain well-bore stability - an under-balance is unlikely

    Casing is normally set directly above the producingformation

    However, horizontal wells have a great capacity for flow.

    208

    Horizontal Drilling Well ControlCauses of Kicks

    Insufficient mud weight:

  • 8/10/2019 Well Control Slideshow 2014_15.pdf

    208/217

    Insufficient mud weight:-

    Drilling across a fault into a high pressure formation

    Mud weight reduced due to gas cutting, water cutting

    Swabbing:-