Name of Department: Information Technology

Subject Teacher: Suryawanshi Sujata J. Subject Name and Code: FCCN (214453)

Class: SE IT Semester: 4

Sr.

No

Name of Teaching

Method /Assessment ToolDescription of Method

Marks

Assigne

d

Relevance

of course

Outcome

(CO)

1 Dramatic presentations

Student will divided into groups

and demonstrate the working of

protocol which will help them to

understand working practically

30

CO1, CO2,

CO3,

CO4,CO5,

CO6

2 Brainstorming

Students will be divided into

groups which will help them to

understand the problem

30 CO5, CO6

3 PresentationStudent will give seminar on the

topic of Poster making activity. 40

CO1, CO2,

CO3,

CO4,CO5,

CO6

Year: 2018-19

(Note: There shall be Minimum of three to five Methods used per course, It is mandatory to design Rubrics and Keep Record of Assessment based on Rubrics which further use for Attainment of CO-PO)

Rubrics for Teaching Method and Assessment: 1. Dramatic presentations of Flow control n Noiseless Channel

Category Max.Score Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

Understanding of

concept

10Clearly

Understanding of given topic

Satisfactory Understanding

Less Understanding

Involvement of

students

10Fully Involved in

DiscussionSatisfactory involvement

Less Involvement

Voice 5

Words clear and well-projected.

Varied rate, volume, pitch and

pause.

Words clear. Varied rate and volume.

Voice fits character. Words pronounced

correctly.

Words muffled and unclear. Monotone. Words pronounced

incorrectly.

Ensemble teamwork

5

Student's attainment of teamwork and of

the goal to workeffectively together

is superlative.

Student's attainment of teamwork and fruition of goal to work effectively

together is acceptable.

Student has no or little concept of how to work as a group

member.

2. Brainstorming Activity Rubrics :

Sr.

No

Evaluation Criteria

Max. Mark

s

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

1 Understanding of topic 5

Less understanding

satisfactory understanding

Clear understanding

2Effective discussion and involvement

10

Less understanding of the topic and less involvement

Satisfactory understanding of the topic

Clear understanding of topic and full involvement

3 Question and Answer 5

Does not answer to questions

Answers questions, but often with little insight.

Satisfactory answers of the question

3. Presentation:

Category Max. Score Level 3 Level 2 Level 1

Relevance of topic

(05) 10

Presentation is effectively Designed

on given topic

One of irrelevant concept is included in the presentation.

Presentation is messy or very poorly designed.

Seminar report -

Technical Content

(10)

10

Well form designed seminar report with

all technical perspective

seminar report designed with all

technical perspective

seminar report with few missing technical

perspective

Knowledge of topic &

Presentation Slides

(05)

10

Demonstrated full knowledge & answered all

questions with elaboration

Demonstrated full knowledge & answered few

questions

Knowledge demonstration is poor

Communication Skills

(05) 5Deliver the

presentation fluently & Confidently

Deliver the presentation with less confidence

Delivery of presentation is very poorly

Timely Delivery of Presentatio

n5 On date Within one week Within Two week

Dr. V. R. Sonawane Ms. Surywanshi J. R. Ms. Suryawanshi S. J.

Head of Department NBA Coordinator Subject Teacher