16
Latin American Dialysis and Transplantation Registry Ana María Cusumano April 13, 2011 WCN2011 8th Conference on Kidney Disease in Disadvantaged Populations Latin American Society of Nephrology and Hypertension (SLANH)

WCN2011 8th Conference on Kidney Disease in Disadvantaged

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Latin American Dialysis and Transplantation Registry

Ana María Cusumano April 13, 2011

WCN2011 8th Conference on Kidney Disease in Disadvantaged

Populations

Latin American Society of Nephrology and Hypertension (SLANH)

Latin-America 2008 Population: 563 294 000 inhab. (includes PR) Population growth: 1.1% Older than 65 yrs old: 6.6% (4.2-13.7) Health expenditure per capita: $ 717,5 (range 218-1322) % urban population: 73 (range 61-98) Improvement in socio-economic indexes 2000-2008:

•  GNI per capita: 3300 to 7012 •  Life expectancy at birth: 71.6 to 73.4. •  % poor people (1999-2007) 43,8 to 34,1% •  % indigent population: 18,5 to 13,3%

SLANH: 20 countries: 557488 000 inhab. (99 % LA)

Latin american countries ¨  All classified, according to GNI, among low middle income and high middle

income, except Puerto Rico (high income) ¨  Epidemiological & Demographic transition on-going:

Stages demograpic trasition

Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Incipient Moderate Full Advanced

Time

B i r t h & D e a t h r a t e

Guatemala Haiti Bolivia

Argentina Brasil Chile Costa Rica Cuba Uruguay: very advanced

Colombia Ecuador El Salvador Honduras Mexico Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru Dominican Rep. Venezuela

WHO 2008

Pros and Cons of the LADTR n  Cons:

¨  Voluntary reporting. ¨  Not all countries reported each year, not always with the same data ¨  In the case of México, country data are extrapolated from the Jalisco

and, since 2007, Morelos Registry ( 8,61 million inhabitants) ¨  The number of patients living with a functioning kidney graft many

times is an estimation n  Pros:

¨  Continuity along the time since 1991 ¨  It has

n  Contributed to the knowledge of RRT epidemiology in LA n  Helped to the development of National Registries. n  Let comparisons among countries and with other registries, n  Establish the trends in the treatment of extreme CKD in LA.

¨  Today, Latin American data can be consulted in international publications data base.

LADTR 1992-2008. Renal Replament treatment Prevalence, all modalities

SLANH 2006

119129

131147

173 174 199258 278

335 352387 424 443 478 473

522568

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Prevalen

ce  (p

mp)

year

Prevalence RRT rates IRCT: Puerto Rico 1170, Uruguay 1079, Chile 1034 (in pmp) Prevalence rates: dialysis 455 pmp (HD: 337 PD 118); functioning kidney graft: 105 pmp

Total number of patients: 313,525 HD: 189,137 ptes (59%) PD: 65,824 ptes (21%) Functioning graft: 58,564 ptes (19%)

HD Centers : 2155, 1/118 dialysis pts 1/258,695 inhabitantes Tx Centers 502: 1c/508 dialysis patients 1 c/ 1,110,534 inhabitantes

Prevalent Patients number (in miles), by year

0,0020,0040,0060,0080,00100,00120,00140,00160,00180,00200,00

1992

1993

1994

1995

96/97

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Patie

nts

HDDPtx

-100 100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 Puerto Rico 2

Uruguay

Chile

Argentina *

México

Brasil

El Salvador

Colombia *

Venezuela 2007

Panamá

Cuba

Costa Rica

Ecuador

Guatemala

Perú *

Honduras

Rep Dominicana

Bolivia 2007

Paraguay 2006

Nicaragua

Latin America 562 pmp

Broad variability in RRT prevalence rate among countries

568 pmp

Epidemiologic transition stage

Countries Prev. Rates pmp

Stage 1 Incipient

Stage 2 Moderate

Guatemala Bolivia

RRT HD DP FG

215 104 84 27

Stage 3 Full

Colombia Ecuador El Salvador Honduras Mexico Nicaragua Panama Paraguay-Peru Dominican Rep. Venezuela

RRT HD DP FG

495 244 207 43

Stage 4 Adanced & very advanced

Argentina Brazil-Chile Costa Rica Cuba-Uruguay P.Rico

RRT HD DP FG

676.5 463 39 175

Income Countries Prev. Rates pmp

Low income < $ 995

Lower Middle income $996-3945

Ecuador El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua Paraguay

RRT HD DP FG

251 160 91 23

Upper Middle income $ 3946-12195

Argentina Brazil-Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cuba- Mexico Panama-Peru Dominican Rep Uruguay Venezuela

RRT HD DP FG

560 360 124 116

High income > $12195

Puerto Rico RRT HD DP FG

1170 997 80 92

GNI vs Prevalence rate (excluded PR) 2008

Prevalence rate & age (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Cuba, Ecuador, Panamá, Perú, Puerto Rico,

Uruguay, 56% LA Population)

2007    

Rate   #  Pa+ents  <20 20.4   2299  20-59 473.8   79785  >60 1787.4   56856  

138940  

Correlations (2008) p value

GNI 0.000 Health expenditure in $ 0.001 % inhabitantes > 65 years 0.000 Life expectancy 0.017 % urban population 0.000

RRT incidence rates (pmp)

data 2007

2007-2008: Incidence was reported by14 countries (91% LA population). Number of patients registered: 2007-08 100968 (~40% of prevalent patients).

050

100150200250300350400450

Mexico

Puerto Rico

HondurasChile

UruguayBrazil

Colombia

Argentin

a

Venezuela

CUBA

Ecuador

Bolivia

Peru

LA 2008

LA 2007

0,0050,00100,00150,00200,00250,00300,00350,00400,00

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Chile Puerto  Rico Uruguay Argentina Latin  America

Stabilization incidence rate: Puerto Rico, Chile & Argentina

México 430 pmp PR 334 pmp Chile 172 pmp Uruguay 165 pmp LA 208 pmp

United States: 362 pmp Portugal 232 pmp Italia 150.9 Spain 128 pmp Japan 288 pmp

Tx registered in 2009: 9724 (19 countries) Total registered 1987-2009: 136567 Nicaragua, Honduras & El Salvador: only living donors % of deceased donor: stable around 50%

LADKTR: Transplantation rate (pmp): 1987-2009

Trasplantation rates, by country year 2009

0 16 32 48

ArgentinaBoliviaBrazilChile

ColombiaC. Rica

CubaEcuador

El SalvadorGuatemala

HondurasMexico

NicaraguaPanama

ParaguayPeru

P.RicoR.

UruguayVenezuela

LA

Double transplants performed in 7 countries: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Perú, Uruguay & Mexico.

35.52

¿Why so many variations among countries?

• Still countries with no full RRT coverage • Diferences in stages of epidemiological transition, life expectancy, % of older people, GNI, urbanization, etc. • RRT begun at different times in the LA countries.

•  1947, 1st dialysis in Brazil •  1957, 1st transplant in Argentina. •  2000: 1st dialysis in Nicaragua.

• Countries, even now, which do not have laws regulating RRT practice, nor assuring coverage.

Conclusions n  RRT: available in all countries, yet not to all pts who

need it n  Higher prevalence rates: Puerto Rico, Uruguay and

Chile n  Highest incidence rates: Mexico and Puerto Rico n  RRT Prevalence rates correlates directly with GNI, % of

population over 65 años, life expectancy, health expenditure in constant dollars and % urban population.

n  Kidney Transplantation rates increasing, but will not resolve the growing increase in prevalence.

n  Prevention of risk factors and early detection and treatment of CKD continues been the solution to reduce the increasing RRT prevalence

Carlota Gonzalez Bedat Sergio Marinovich Guillermo García García Tomaso Bachichio Sdenka Maury Fernadez Jocemir Lugon Hugo Poblete Badal Rafael Gomez Fabio Hernandez Miguel Almaguer Nelly Freyre Ricardo Leiva Merino Jorge Luna Guerra Gaspar Rodriguez Cesar Cuero Carlos Pereda Sandra Ivelize Rodriguez Raúl Carlini