19
Water-free Combined Cycle Power Plants for Distributed Power Generation Michael Welch Industry Marketing Manager, Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery Ltd, UK

Water-free Combined Cycle Power Plants for Distributed

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Water-free Combined Cycle

Power Plants for Distributed

Power Generation

Michael Welch

Industry Marketing Manager, Siemens Industrial

Turbomachinery Ltd, UK

• Clean

– Low CO2

– Low NOx etc.

• Efficient

• Affordable

– Best LCOE on 1x1

or 2x1 large GT

configuration

• Centralized Power

COMBINED CYCLE

POWER GENERATION

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70 Open Cycle

Combined Cycle

• Located close to consumers

• Off-grid or grid support

applications

– Industry, Mines, Hospitals

• Security of energy supply

• Reduced investment in

Transmission infrastructure

• Potential to supply heat

DISTRIBUTED POWER

GENERATION

• Multiple smaller units for:

– Flexibility

– Reliability

– Availability

– High Efficiency over a wide

operating range

– Emissions compliance over

wide operating range

DISTRIBUTED POWER

GENERATION

• >15% of world water withdrawals used in power generation

WATER SCARCITY

• Replace water with high

density organic fluid

– Saves c.20000 TPY water

for a 30MW plant

• Well-matched for lower

exhaust temperature GTs

• Various ORC

configurations available

• Lower maintenance than

steam

COMBINED CYCLE USING

ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE

• The most common

approach

INDIRECTLY HEATED ORC

• Offers improved

efficiency and

lower CAPEX

DIRECTLY HEATED ORC

• Offers highest

efficiency

CASCADE CYCLE ORC

ORC VS STEAM COMPARISON

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

3 x 14MW GT 1 x 40MW GT 1 x 55MW GT

Power Output (MW)

Steam Indirect ORC Direct ORC Cascade ORC

15°C, sea level

ORC VS STEAM COMPARISON

42

44

46

48

50

52

54

3 x 14MW GT 1 x 40MW GT 1 x 55MW GT

Net Efficiency (%)

Steam Indirect ORC Direct ORC Cascade ORC

15°C, sea level

ORC VS STEAM COMPARISON

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

3 x 14MW GT

Installed Cost Comparison (% based on US$/kW calculation)

Steam Indirect ORC Direct ORC Cascade ORC

15°C, sea level

ORC VS STEAM COMPARISON

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

US$3/mmbtu US$7/mmbtu US$12/mmbtu

3 x 14MW GT: LCOE Comparison (US c/kWh)

Steam Direct ORC Cascade ORC

US Location, modelled by US EPC

GT ORC VS RICE COMPARISON

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

US$3/mmbtu US$7/mmbtu US$12/mmbtu

3 x 14MW GT: Indicative LCOE Comparison (US c/kWh)

RICE 1 RICE 2 Direct ORC Cascade ORC

US Location, modelled by US EPC

GT ORC VS RICE COMPARISON

Based on specific location, MEA region, high temperature

CHP IS STILL POSSIBLE

POTENTIAL CSP

HYBRID SOLUTION

• Competitive water-free

solution

• Low environmental impact

• Flexible, reliable power for

Decentralized Power

Generation

• Adaptable for specific needs

• Potential to integrate with

renewables

CONCLUSIONS

CONTACT DETAILS

Michael Welch

Industry Marketing Manager

Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery Ltd.

Joseph Ruston Building

Pelham Street

Lincoln LN5 7FD

United Kingdom

Phone: +44 1522 58 40 00

E-mail: [email protected]