W1-104 In re State Trust Lands Doc. No File Date … · documents to the Arizona Department of Water Resources. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, el al. ... Sales Corporation, the City of

MARICOPA COUNTY CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT

W1-104 In re State Trust Lands

Doc. No File Date Document Description

W1-104 Page 11

031 01-17-2006 APPLICATION FOR EX PARTE ORDER APPROVING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND AMENDING MAILING LIST SUMMARY: Terry Goddard, Attorney General of Arizona, hereby applies ex parte for an order approving the substitution of Assistant Attorney Mary Mangotich Grier for Assistant Attorneys General Graham M. Clark, Jr. and Courtney A. Fligeltaub, as counsel for the Defendant State of Arizona in its capacity as a claimant in the above-captioned proceeding, and directing that Mary Mangotich Grier be added to the official mailing list in this proceeding. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 032 01-31-2006 NOTICE OF FILING ASARCO LLC’s, ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES COPORATION’S, ARIZONA WATER COMPANY’S , THE CITY OF PRESCOTT’S, AND TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY’S JOINT INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC, Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation, Arizona Water Company, the City of Prescott, and Tucson Electric Power Company notify claimants on the court-approved mailing list of In re State Trust Lands that these Opposing Claimants filed their joint initial disclosure statement with the Court, served their joint initial disclosure statement with the Court, served their joint initial disclosure statement on the court-approved mailing list for these contested cases, and submitted their joint initial disclosure statement and disclosed documents to the Arizona Department of Water Resources. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, el al. PAGES: 3 033 01-31-2006 GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY’S INITIAL RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: The Gila River Indian Community submits its initial Rule 26.1 disclosure statement in In re State Trust Lands. CLAIMANT NO: 39-11-54-78, et al. PAGES: 32 034 01-31-2006 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF FILING THE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF BELLA VISTA WATER CO., INC., PUEBLO DEL SOL WATER COMPANY AND THE CITY OF SIERRA VISTA SUMMARY: Notice of Service of the Initial Disclosure Statement Bella Vista Water Co., Inc., Pueblo Del Sol Water Company and the City of Sierra Vista. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 11

035 01-31-2006 JOINDER IN JOINT INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF ASARCO LLC, ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION, ARIZONA WATER COMPANY, THE CITY OF PRESCOTT, AND TUCSON ELECTRIC COMPANY, FILED PURSUANT TO RULE 26.1, ARIZ. R. CIV. P., AND SALT RIVER PROJECT’S INITIAL RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: The City of Flagstaff, Rio Rico Properties, Inc., City of Safford, and Paloma Irrigation and Drainage District join in initial disclosure statements filed by ASARCO LLC, Arizona Water Company, Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation, City of Prescott, Tucson Electric Power Company and Salt River Project. CLAIMANT NO: 39-U8-40757, et al. PAGES: 3 036 01-31-2006 ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S AND ASARCO LLC’S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF:

(1) FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION; (2) FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES; AND (3) FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF

DOCUMENTS UPON THE STATE OF ARIZONA’S LAND DEPARTMENT SUMMARY: Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation and ASARCO LLC, notify claimants on the court-approved mailing list of In re State Trust Lands that these claimants served the following on the Arizona State Land Department: 1) first set of requests for admission; 2) first set of interrogatories; and 3) first set of request for production of documents in accordance with the Special Master’s Scheduling Order dated May 19, 2005. CLAIMANT NO: 39-u8-62699, et al. PAGES: 2 037 01-31-2006 CITIES’ INITIAL RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF FILING DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: The Cities of Chandler, Glendale, Mesa and Scottsdale (“Cities”) submit their Initial Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement. CLAIMANT NO: 39-L8-37521, et al. PAGES: 6 038 01-31-2006 INITIAL RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF CITY OF PHOENIX AND NOTICE OF FILING DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: The City of Phoenix submits its initial Disclosure Statement in this contested case. CLAIMANT NO: 39-07-7927, et al. PAGES: 5




W1-104 Page 11

039 01-31-2006 JOINT INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF ASARCO LLC, ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION, ARIZONA WATER COMPANY, THE CITY OF PRESCOTT, AND TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, FILED PURSUANT TO RULE 26.1, ARIZ. R. CIV. P. SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC, Arizona Water Company, Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation, the City of Prescott, and Tucson Electric Power Company, file their initial disclosure statement pursuant to Rule 26.1, Ariz. R. Civ. P., and Special Master’s May 19, 2005, Scheduling Order. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 26 040 01-31-2006 BHP COPPER, INC.’S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS SUMMARY: BHP Copper Inc. submit its Notice of Service of Discovery Requests. CLAIMANT NO: 39-11-0003142, et al. PAGES: 3 041 01-31-2006 BHP COPPER INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF SERVICE SUMMARY: BHP Copper Inc. submits its Initial Disclosure Statement pursuant to Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 26.1 and the Special Master’s Scheduling Order dated May 19, 2005. CLAIMANT NO: 39-11-0003142, et al. PAGES: 15+3(attachments)=18(total)

042 01-31-2006 SALT RIVER PROJECT’S INITIAL RULE 26.1 STATEMENT AND NOTICE THEREOF SUMMARY: The Salt River Project submits its initial Rule 26.1 disclosure statement. CLAIMANT NO: 39-07-1040, et al. PAGES: 29+14(attachments)=43(total).




W1-104 Page 12

043 01-31-2006 NOTICE OF FILING INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF THE SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE, YAVAPAI-APACHE NATION, TONTO APACHE TRIBE AND PASCUA-YAQUI TRIBE SUMMARY: The San Carlos Apache Tribe, Yavapai-Apache Nation, Tonto Apache Tribe and Pascua-Yaqui Tribe file their joint Notice of Filing Initial Disclosure Statement in In re State Trust Lands, Contested Case No. W1-104. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2 044 01-31-2006 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF THE SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE, YAVAPAI-APACHE NATION, TONTO APACHE TRIBE, AND PASCUA-YAQUI TRIBE SUMMARY: The San Carlos Apache Tribe, Yavapai-Apache Nation, Tonto Apache Tribe and Pascua-Yavapai Tribe file their joint Initial Disclosure Statement in In re State Trust Lands, Contested Case No. W1-104. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 11 045 01-31-2006 CITY OF GOODYEAR’S NOTICE OF NON-FILING OF DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: The City of Goodyear files its Notice of Non-Filing of Disclosure Statement as required by Special Master’s Scheduling Order dated May 19, 2005. CLAIMANT NO: 39-37573, et al. PAGES: 2 046 01-31-2006 INITIAL RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND ROOSEVELT WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND NOTICE OF FILING DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: Arizona Public Service Company, Phelps Dodge Corporation and Roosevelt Water Conservation District submit their initial Disclosure Statement in this contested case. CLAIMANT NO: 39-34900, et al. PAGES: 9+8(attachments)=17(total) 047 02-01-2006 UNITED STATES’ NOTICE OF FILING INITIAL DISCLOSURES SUMMARY: The United States’ provides notice of filing initial disclosures with the Arizona Department of Water Resources pursuant to Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 26.1 and the Special Master’s Scheduling Order dated May 19, 2005 and amended Order dated December 19, 2005. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2




W1-104 Page 12

048 02-01-2006 UNITED STATES’ INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: The United States’ initial disclosure statement pursuant to Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 26.1 and the Special Master’s Scheduling Order dated May 19, 2005 as amended by Order dated December 19, 2005. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 7 049 02-01-2006 DISCLOSURES OF THE NAVAJO NATION PURSUANT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER (May 19, 2005) SUMMARY: The Navajo Nation makes disclosures pursuant to the Scheduling Order (May 19, 2005) CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 10 050 02-01-2006 BHP COPPER, INC.’S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA SUMMARY: Pursuant to Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure 26, 33.1, 34 and the Special Master’s Scheduling Order dated May 19, 2005 (“Scheduling Order”), BHP Copper Inc. (“BHP”) requests that the State of Arizona (the “State”) produce the designated documents named below for inspection and copying by BHP and answer the following Interrogatories, under oath by March 17, 2006. For the purposes of these Requests for the Production of Documents and Non-Uniform Interrogatories, definitions and instructions have been submitted. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 7 051 02-01-2006 EXHIBIT A TO STATE’S NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO OPPOSING CLAIMANTS SUMMARY: Pursuant to Rules 26, 33, and 34, Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that the above- named Opposing Claimant, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the following non-uniform interrogatories, and produce each of the documents described hereinafter for inspection and copying by the State, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, or at such other time and place, within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 23




W1-104 Page 12

052 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that BHP Copper, Inc., on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 053 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that City of Glendale, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 12

054 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that City of Sierra Vista, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 055 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that City of Chandler, Inc., on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 12

056 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that City of Mesa, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 057 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Pueblo Del Sol Water Company, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 058 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Town of Clarkdale, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 12

059 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”)

hereby requests that Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties.

CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 060 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Franklin Irrigation District, on or before March 15, 2006, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 12

061 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that City of Flagstaff, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 062 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Rio Rico Properties, Inc., on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time

and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties.

CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 12

063 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Rio Rico Utilities, Inc., on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 064 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that City of Show Low, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 12

065 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Bella Vista Water Company, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 066 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that City of Cottonwood, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 12

067 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that City of Safford, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 068 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Arizona Public Service Company, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 12

069 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Phelps Dodge Corporation, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 070 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that City of Phoenix, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 12

071 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Roosevelt Water Conservation District, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non- uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 072 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 12

073 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Salt River Valley Water Users Association, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non- uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 074 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Gila Valley Irrigation District, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 12

075 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that City of Scottsdale, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 076 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Town of Jerome, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 077 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Town of Gilbert, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 12

078 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that Maricopa Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage District, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 079 02-01-2006 STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTIOIN OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, the State of Arizona acting by and through the Arizona State Land Department (“State”) hereby requests that City of Sedona, on or before March 15, 2006, answer, in writing and under oath, the non-uniform interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying by the State each of the documents, stated or described on Exhibit A to State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants (“Exhibit A”) which is attached hereto, with such production and copying to continue from day-to-day thereafter for so long as the examination and copying of such documents may be required, at the offices of the Attorney General, or at such other time and place within the jurisdiction of the Court, as are mutually agreeable to the parties. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 080 02-01-2006 ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S AND ASARCO LLC’S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF:

(1)FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION; (2)FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES; AND (3)FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SERVED UPON THE STATE OF ARIZONA’S LAND DEPARTMENT

SUMMARY: Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation and ASARCO LLC, notify claimants on the court-approved mailing list of In re State Trust Lands that these claimants served the following on the Arizona State Land Department: 1) first set of requests for admission; 2) first set of interrogatories; and 3) first set of request for production of documents in accordance with the Special Master’s Scheduling Order dated May 19, 2005. CLAIMANT NO: 39-U8-62699, et al. PAGES: 17




W1-104 Page 12

081 02-07-2006 JOINDER IN INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND ROOSEVELT WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT SUMMARY: The Town of Jerome, the Town of Clarkdale, the City of Cottonwood(collectively, the “Verde Valley Communities”) and the Gila Valley Irrigation District, the Franklin Irrigation District (collectively, the “Upper Valley Irrigation Districts”), and the Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District and Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage District: (“Central Valley Irrigation Districts”), join in the Initial Disclosure Statement filed by counsel for the Arizona Public Service Company, Phelps Dodge Corporation and Roosevelt Water Conservation District this date. CLAIMANT NO: 39-47811, et al. PAGES: 3 082 02-08-2006 JOINDER IN SALT RIVER PROJECT’S INITIAL RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND NOTICE THEREOF SUMMARY: The San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage Distict and Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1 join in the Initial Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement filed on January 31, 2006 by the Salt River Project. CLAIMANT NO: U8-63606, et al. PAGES: 2 083 02-14-2006 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS (COPY) SUMMARY: The Arizona Department of Water Resources, technical advisor to the Court in the above referenced matter, hereby gives notice of a new mailing address, effective immediately. The new address is: Arizona Department of Water Resources Legal Division 3550 North Central Avenue, 4th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85012 CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2 084 02-15-2006 APPLICATION FOR EX PARTE ORDER APPROVING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL SUMMARY: The City of Chandler, by its undersigned attorney, hereby gives notice that Michael D. House is hereby substituted for and in the place of Dennis M. O’Neill as City Attorney for the City of Chandler in the above captioned proceedings. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2




W1-104 Page 13

085 03-01-2006 ORDER SUBSTITUTING COUNSEL SUMMARY: IT IS ORDERED removing Dennis M. O’Neill from the court- approved mailing list and adding Michael D. House, City Attorney, City of Chandler, City Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 4008, Mail Stop 602, Chandler, Arizona 85244-4008; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Cynthia J. Haglin, Assistant City Attorney, shall also continue to serve as counsel of record in the above-entitled actions. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 1 086 03-17-2006 ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY’S ANSWERS TO STATE’S STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Arizona Public Service Company submits its Answers to the State’s First Set of Non-Uniform Interrogatories and its Response to the State’s Requests for Production of Documents. CLAIMANT NO: 39-34900, et al. PAGES: 5 087 03-17-2006 PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION’S ANSWERS TO STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Phelps Dodge Corporation submits its Answers to the State’s First Set of Non-Uniform Interrogatories and its Response to the State’s Requests for Production of Documents. CLAIMANT NO: 39-62935, et al. PAGES: 5 088 03-17-2006 ROOSEVELT WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT’S ANSWERS TO STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: Roosevelt Water Conservation District submits its Answers to the State’s First Set of Non-Uniform Interrogatories and its Response to the State’s Requests for Production of Documents. CLAIMANT NO: 39-3421, et al. PAGES: 5 089 03-17-2006 CITY OF PHOENIX ANSWERS TO STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: The City of Phoenix submits its Answers to the State’s First Set of Non-Uniform Interrogatories and its Response to the State’s Requests for Production of Documents. CLAIMANT NO: 39-07-7927, et al. PAGES: 4




W1-104 Page 13

090 03-17-2006 JOINDER IN INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION AND ROOSEVELT WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT SUMMARY: The City of Show Low joins in the Initial Disclosure Statement filed by Counsel for the Arizona Public Service Company, Phelps Dodge Corporation and Roosevelt Water Conservation District this date. CLAIMANT NO: 39-84279, et al. PAGES: 2 091 03-20-2006 SALT RIVER PROJECT’S ANSWERS TO STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: The Salt River Project submits its Answers to the State’s First Set of Non-Uniform Interrogatories and its Response to the State’s Requests for Production of Documents. CLAIMANT NO: 39-07-1040, et al. PAGES: 4+7(attachments)=11(total). 092 03-20-2006 THE CITIES’ ANSWERS TO STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: The Cities of Chandler, Glendale, Mesa and Scottsdale (“Cities”) submit their Answers to the State’s First Set of Non-Uniform Interrogatories and its Response to the State’s Requests for Production of Documents. CLAIMANT NO: 39-L8-37521, et al. PAGES: 8 093 03-20-2006 BHP COPPER INC.’S RESPONSE TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA’S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES SUMMARY: BHP Copper Inc.’s Response to the State of Arizona’s First Request for Production of Documents and Non-Uniform Interrogatories. CLAIMANT NO: 39-11-0003142, et al. PAGES: 4 094 03-22-2006 CITY OF PHOENIX ERRATA TO ANSWERS TO STATE’S FIRST SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SUMMARY: The City of Phoenix submits its Errata to include the Verification of Tom Buschatzke, Water Resources Management Advisor, to the City of Phoenix’ Answers to the State’s First Set of Non- Uniform Interrogatories and its Response to the State’s Requests for Production of Documents which was filed on March 17, 2006. CLAIMANT NO: 39-07-7927, et al. PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 13

095 03-27-2006 EX PARTE ORDER APPROVING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND AMENDING MAILING LIST SUMMARY: IT IS ORDERED approving the substitution of Assistant Attorney General Mary Mangotich Grier for Graham M. Clark, Jr. and Courtney A. Fligeltaub, as counsel for the State of Arizona as a claimant in these proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the mailing list in this proceeding shall be amended to delete the names and address presently listed for Graham M. Clark, Jr. and Courtney A. Fligeltaub and to add in place thereof the following: Mary Mangotich Grier Assistant Attorney General Natural Resources Section Office of the Attorney General 1275 W. Washington Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2926 CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2 096 03-28-2006 ANSWER TO STATE’S NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO OPPOSING CLAIMANTS SUMMARY: The City of Flagstaff answers the State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants. CLAIMANT NO: 39-U8-40757 PAGES: 3 097 03-28-2006 ANSWER TO STATE’S NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO OPPOSING CLAIMANTS SUMMARY: The City of Safford answers the State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants. CLAIMANT NO: 39-U8-63161, et al. PAGES: 3 098 03-28-2006 ANSWER TO STATE’S NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO OPPOSING CLAIMANTS SUMMARY: Rio Rico Properties, Inc. answers the State’s Non-Uniform Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Opposing Claimants. CLAIMANT NO: 39-09-7774, et al. PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 14

099 04-04-2006 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL SUMMARY: Moyes Storey Ltd. Applies to the Court for leave to withdraw as counsel of record in these matters for Rio Rico Utilities Inc. CLAIMANT NO: 39-09-76107, et al. PAGES: 3 100 04-05-2006 APPLICATION TO WITHDRAW FROM CONTESTED CASE PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY: Rio Rico Utilities, Inc. applies to withdraw as a party to this Contest Case. CLAIMANT NO: 39-09-76107, et al. PAGES: 2 101 04-06-2006 NOTICE OF DEPOSITION PURSUANT TO RULE 30(b)(6) SUMMARY: Notice of Deposition Pursuant to Ariz. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6). CLAIMANT NO: 39-11-0003142, et al. PAGES: 6 102 04-07-2006 INITIAL RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF FILING THE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF BELLA VISTA WATER CO., INC., PUEBLO DEL SOL WATER COMPANY AND THE CITY OF SIERRA VISTA SUMMARY: The Bella Vista Water Co., Inc., Pueblo Del Sol Water Company and the City of Sierra Vista provide their initial Disclosure Statement. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 7 103 04-07-2006 NOTICE OF DEPOSITION SUMMARY: Notice of Deposition of Commissioner Mark Winkleman. CLAIMANT NO: 39-11-0003142, et al. PAGES: 3 104 04-13-2006 RETURNED MAIL SUMMARY: Undeliverable mail Re: Ex Parte Order Approving Substitution of Counsel and Amending Mailing List File Date: 06-13-2003 CLAIMANT NO: Not Applicable PAGES: Envelope containing the returned mail (1)




W1-104 Page 14

105 04-26-2006 APPLICATION FOR EX PARTE ORDER APPROVING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND AMENDING MAILING LIST SUMMARY: Terry Goddard hereby applies ex parte for an order approving the substitution of Assistant Attorney Mary Mangotich Grier for Assistant Attorneys General Graham M. Clark, Jr. and Courtney A. Fligeltaub, as counsel for the Defendant State of Arizona in its capacity as a claimant in the above-captioned proceeding, and directing that Mary Mangotich Grier be added to the official mailing list in this proceeding. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 106 04-26-2006 EX PARTE ORDER APPROVING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND AMENDING MAILING LIST SUMMARY: IT IS ORDERED approving the substitution of Assistant Attorney General Mary Mangotich Grier for Graham M. Clark, Jr. and Courtney A. Fligeltaub, as counsel for the State of Arizona as a claimant in these proceedings. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2




W1-104 Page 15

107 04-27-2006 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION SUMMARY: Phelps Dodge Corporation submits its Notice of Service of First Supplemental Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement in this contested case. CLAIMANT NO: 39-62935, et al. PAGES: 2 108 05-08-2006 ORDER APPROVING APPLICATION TO WITHDRAW FROM CONTESTED CASE PROCEEDINGS SUMMARY: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED withdrawing Rio Rico Utilities Inc. as a party to Contested Case Nos. W1-104 and 6417-100, In re State Trust Lands. CLAIMANT NO: Not Given PAGES: 2 109 05-10-2006 APPLICATION FOR EX PARTE ORDER APPROVING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND AMENDING MAILING LIST (COPY) SUMMARY: Terry Goddard, Attorney General of Arizona, hereby applies ex parte for an order approving the substitution of Assistant Attorney Gernal Patrick B. Sigl for Assistant Attorneys General Mary Mangotich Grier and Shanti A. Rosset, as counsel for the Defendant State of Arizona in its capacity as a claimant in the above-captioned poceeding, and directing that Patrick B. Sigl be added to the official mailing list in this proceeding. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 110 05-16-2006 NOTICE OF LOCATION OF JUNE 20, 2006 STATUS CONFERENCE SUMMARY: The Special Master informs of the courtroom location of the status conference previously set on Tuesday, June 20, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2 111 05-18-2006 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS SUMMARY: United States’ Notice of Change of Address CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2 112 05-19-2006 STATE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: Motion by State of Arizona seeking leave to amend its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 4 + attachments




W1-104 Page 15

113 05-19-2006 SEPARATE STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA’S AMENDED MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The State of Arizona submits its Separate Statement of Facts in support of its motion for partial summary judgment establishing the existence of federal reserved water rights for state trust lands. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 13 114 05-19-2006 AFFIDAVIT OF CYNTHIA J. STEFANOVIC IN SUPPORT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA’S AMENDED MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: Cynthia J. Stefanovic provides testimony by affidavit in support of the State of Arizona’s motion for partial summary judgment establishing the existence of implied federal reserved water rights for state trust lands. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 5 115 05-30-2006 ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S RESPONSE TO STATE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC and Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation respond to the State’s Motion for Leave to Amend Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 6 116 05-31-2006 ORDER APPROVING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL SUMMARY: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED withdrawing Lee Storey and Steve Wene of the Moyes Storey Law Firm as counsel of record for Rio Rico Utilities Inc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED adding Donald R. Baker, Vice President and General Manager of Rio Rico Utilities, Inc. to the Court’s mailing list. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2 117 05-31-2006 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The United States’ motion for an extension of time to June 30, 2006 to file motions for summary judgment. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 16

118 05-19-2006 STATE OF ARIZONA’S AMENDED MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ESTABLISHING THE EXISTENCE OF FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS FOR STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: The State of Arizona moves for entry of partial summary judgment establishing the existence of federal reserved water rights for State Trust Lands. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 15 119 06-05-2006 ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S JOINDER IN UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED DETERMINATION SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC and Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation join in the Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Motions for Summary Judgment, filed by the United States and dated May 31, 2006, and request expedited determination of that Motion. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 2 120 06-05-2006 ORDER APPROVING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND AMENDING MAILING LIST SUMMARY: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED approving the substitution of Assistant Attorney General Patrick B. Sigl for Assistant Attorneys General Mary Mangotich Grier and Shanti A. Rosset, as counsel for the State of Arizona as a claimant in these proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the mailing list in this proceeding shall be amended to delete the names and address presently listed for Assistant Attorneys General Mary Mangotich Grier and Shanti A. Rosset, and to add in place thereof the following: Patrick B. Sigl Assistant Attorney General Natural Resources Section Office of the Attorney General 1275 W. Washington Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2926 CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2 121 06-06-2006 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Motions for Summary Judgment. CLAIMANT NO: 39-07-12676, et al. PAGES: 2




W1-104 Page 17

122 06-09-2006 JOINT MOVANTS’ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO STATE OF ARIZONA’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The Joint Movants submit their Response in opposition to the State of Arizona’s Motion for Leave to Amend Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed May 19, 2006. The Joint Movants include Arizona Public Service Company; BHP Copper Inc.; Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District; the Cities of Chandler, Cottonwood, Glendale, Mesa, Phoenix, Scottsdale, and Show Low; Franklin Irrigation District; Gila Valley Irrigation District; Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District; Phelps Dodge Corporation; Roosevelt Water Conservation District; Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association; and the Towns of Clarkdale and Jerome. CLAIMANT NO: 39-L8-34900, et al. PAGES: 14+10(attachments)=24(total) 123 06-09-2006 JOINT MOVANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The Joint Movants submit their motion for summary judgment with respect to the State of Arizona’s claims to federal reserved water rights for state trust lands. The Joint Movants include Arizona Public Service Company; BHP Copper Inc.; Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District; the Cities of Chandler, Cottonwood, Glendale Mesa, Phoenix, Scottsdale, and Show Low; Franklin Irrigation District; Gila Valley Irrigation District; Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District; Phelps Dodge Corporation; Roosevelt Water Conservation District; Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District; Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association; and the Towns of Clarkdale and Jerome. CLAIMANT NO: 39-L8-34900, et al. PAGES: 35+7(attachments)=42(total) 124 06-09-2006 JOINT MOVANTS’ MOTION OT EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION SUMMARY: The Joint Movants submit their motion to exceed the page limitation for purposes of their motion for summary judgment with respect to the State of Arizona’s claims to federal reserved water rights for state trust lands. The Joint Movants include Arizona Public Service Company: BHP Copper Inc.; Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District; the Cities of Chandler, Cottonwood, Glendale Mesa, Phoenix, Scottsdale, and Show Low; Franklin Irrigation District; Gila Valley Irrigation District; Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District; Phelps Dodge Corporation; Roosevelt Water Conservation District; Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District; Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association; and the Towns of Clarkdale and Jerome. CLAIMANT NO: 39-L8-34900, et al. PAGES: 4+11(attachments) = 15(total)




W1-104 Page 17

125 06-09-2006 JOINT MOVANTS’ SEPARATE STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The Joint Movants submit their separate statement of facts in support of their motion for summary judgment with respect to the State of Arizona’s claims to federal reserved water rights for state trust lands. The Joint Movants include Arizona Public Service Company: BHP Copper Inc.; Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District; the Cities of Chandler, Cottonwood, Glendale Mesa, Phoenix, Scottsdale, and Show Low; Franklin Irrigation District; Gila Valley Irrigation District; Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District; Phelps Dodge Corporation; Roosevelt Water Conservation District; Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District; Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association; and the Towns of Clarkdale and Jerome. CLAIMANT NO: 39-L8-34900, et al. PAGES: 27+712(attachments)=739(total) 126 06-09-2006 RESPONSE OF THE NAVAJO NATION TO UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The Navajo Nation files its response to the United States’ Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Motions for Summary Judgment (May 31, 2006). CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 127 06-12-2006 ORDER POSTPONING TIME FOR OTHER PARTIES TO FILE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING REQUEST TO CHANGE STATUS CONFERENCE SUMMARY: The Special Master postpones the June 9, 2006, deadline for other parties to file motions for summary judgment and denies a request to change the status conference set on June 20, 2006. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 128 06-16-2006 MOTION OF THE NAVAJO NATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT WATER RIGHTS FOR THE ARIZONA STATE TRUST LANDS MUST BE OBTAINED PURSUANT TO STATE LAW SUMMARY: The Navajo Nation files its motion for summary judgment pursuant to the Scheduling Order(May 19, 2005). CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 129 06-16-2006 BRIEF OF THE NAVAJO NATION IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TAT WATER RIGHTS FOR THE ARIZONA STATE TRUST LANDS MUST BE OBTAINED PURSUANT TO STATE LAW SUMMARY: The Navajo Nation files its brief in support of its motion for summary judgment pursuant to the Scheduling Order (May 19, 2005). CLAIMANT NO: None Given




W1-104 Page 17

PAGES: 32 130 06-16-2006 STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF NAVAJO NATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The Navajo Nation files its statement of undisputed material facts in support of its motion for summary judgment pursuant to the Scheduling Order (May 19, 2005). CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 5 131 06-16-2006 NAVAJO NATION’S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION SUMMARY: The Navajo Nation files its motion to exceed page limitation. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 132 06-27-2006 ORDER SETTING THE NEW TIMES FOR FILING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT, RESPONSES, AND REPLIES; SETTING ORAL ARGUMENT ON ALL SUMARRY JUDGEMENT MOTIONS; DIRECTING ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES AND DISCOVERY; AND REMOVING A PARTY FROM THE MAILING LISTS SUMMARY: The special master sets a briefing schedule for the State of Arizona’s motion for leave to amend; sets new times for filing motions for summary judgment, requires additional disclosures by the State of Arizona and allows discovery; and removes a party from the Court-approved mailing lists. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 3 133 06-27-2006 MINUTE ENTRY SUMMARY: The last day for filing Responses to the motion for leave to amend is June 28, 2006. The State may file a Reply by July 24, 2006. The Special Master will rule on the motion for leave to amend by August 11, 2006. The deadline to file Motions for Summary Judgment is extended to June 30, 2006. The State shall have until Friday, July 7, 2006, to file additional disclosure regarding the Prescott AMA lands, and all discovery shall be completed by August 11, 2006. The last day to file Replies to all Motions for Summary Judgment will be November 3, 2006. Oral argument will be heard on all Motions for Summary Judgment on December 7, 2006, beginning at 9:00 a.m. and ending not later than 5:00 p.m. The parties shall submit a proposed schedule for oral argument prior to the hearing. CLAIMANT NO: Not Applicable PAGES: 6




W1-104 Page 17

134 06-28-2006 RESPONSE OF THE SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE, YAVAPAI- APACHE NATION, TONTO APACHE TRIBE, AND PASCUA-YAQUI TRIBE TO STATE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: Response of the San Carlos Apache Tribe, Yavapai-Apache Nation, Tonto Apache Tribe, and Pascua-Yaqui Tribe to the State’s Motion for Leave to Amend Partial Motion for Summary Judgment. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 6 135 06-29-2006 NOTICE OF FILING ASARCO LLC’S, ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S, ARIZONA WATER COMPANY’S, THE CITY OF PRESCOTT’S, AND TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY’S FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC, Arizona Water Company, Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation, the City of Prescott, and Tucson Electric Power Company, give notice that they jointly filed their first supplemental disclosure statement pursuant to Rule 26.1, ARIZ. R. CIV. P., and in accordance with the Special Master’s Scheduling Order dated May 19, 2005. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 3 136 06-30-2006 ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE EXISTENCE OF FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS FOR STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC AND Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation file their Statement of Facts In Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding The Existence of Federal Reserved Water Rights for State Trust Lands. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699 et al. PAGES: 13 137 06-30-2006 ASARCO LLC’S ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE EXISTENCE OF FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS FOR STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC and Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation file their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding the Existence of federal Reserved Water Rights for State Trust Lands pursuant to the Special Master’s May 19, 2005 and June 12, 2006 scheduling orders. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 39




W1-104 Page 17

138 06-30-2006 SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE, YAVAPAI-APACHE NATION, TONTO APACHE TRIBE, AND PASCUA-YAQUI TRIBE’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The San Carlos Apache Tribe, Yavapai-Apache Nation, Tonto Apache Tribe, and Pascua-Yavapai submit their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment with respect to the State of Arizona’s claims to federal reserved water rights for State trust lands. CLAIMANT NO: 39-07-12676, et al. PAGES: 10 139 06-30-2006 SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE, YAVAPAI-APACHE NATION, TONTO APACHE TRIBE, AND PASCUA-YAQUI TRIBE’S STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS IN SUPPORT OF PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The San Carlos Apache Tribe, Yavapai-Apache Nation, Tonto Apache Tribe, and Pascua-Yavapai submit their Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Partial Summary Judgment with respect to the State of Arizona’s claims to federal reserved water rights for State trust lands. CLAIMANT NO: 39-07-12676, et al. PAGES: 4 140 06-30-2006 ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITIBI SONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION AND FORM OF ORDER SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC and Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation submit their motion to exceed the page limitation for purposes of their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding the Existence of Federal Reserved Water Rights for State Trust Lands. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 4 141 06-30-2006 ASARCO LLC’S ABITIBI SONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S, ARIZONA WATER COMPANY’S, THE CITY OF PRESCOTT’S, AND TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY’S FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC, Arizona Water Company, Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation, the City of Prescott, and Tucson Electric Power Company, jointly filed their first supplemental disclosure statement pursuant to Rule 26.1, ARIZ. R. CIV. P., and in accordance with the Special Master’s Scheduling Order dated May 19, 2005. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 10




W1-104 Page 17

142 06-30-2006 APPENDICE’S TO ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE EXISTENCE OF FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS FOR STATE TRUST LANDS AND SUPPORTING STATEMENT OF FACTS VOLUME ONE FEDERAL STATUTES AND OTHER CONGRESSIONAL MATERIALS SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC and Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation file Volume One of the Appendices to their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding the Existence of Federal Reserved Water Rights and Supporting Statement of Facts. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 247 143 06-30-2006 APPENDICE’S TO ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE EXISTENCE OF FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS FOR STATE TRUST LANDS AND SUPPORTING STATEMENT OF FACTS VOLUME TWO NON- CONGRESSIONAL MATERIALS (1 OF 2) SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC and Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation file Volume Two of the Appendices to their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding the Existence of Federal Reserved Water Rights and Supporting Statement of Facts. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 355 144 06-30-2006 APPENDICE’S TO ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE EXISTENCE OF FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS FOR STATE TRUST LANDS AND SUPPORTING STATEMENT OF FACTS VOLUME TWO NON- CONGRESSIONAL MATERIALS (2 OF 2) SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC and Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation file Volume Two of the Appendices to their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding the Existence of Federal Reserved Water Rights and Supporting Statement of Facts. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 288 145 06-30-2006 GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY’S MOTION TO EXCEED THE PAGE LIMITATION FOR ITS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGEMENT IN RE: STATE TRUST LANDS

SUMMARY: The Gila River Indian Community submits a Motion to exceed the page limitation for its Motion for Summary Judgment in Re: State Trust Lands.

CLAIMANT NO: 39-11-54-78, et al. PAGES: 3




W1-104 Page 16

146 06-30-2006 GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGEMENT SUMMARY: The Gila River Indian Community submits a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment requesting the Court to deny federally reserved water rights to state trust lands. CLAIMANT NO: 39-11-54-78, et al. PAGES: 31




W1-104 Page 17

146 06-30-2006 GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGEMENT SUMMARY: The Gila River Indian Community submits a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment requesting the Court to deny federally reserved water rights to state trust lands. CLAIMANT NO: 39-11-54-78, et al. PAGES: 31 147 7-03-2006 NOTICE OF FILING ASARCO LLC’S ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S, ARIZONA WATER COMPANY’S THE CITY OF PRESCOTT’S, AND TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY’S FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC, Arizona water company, Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation, the City of Prescott, and Tucson Electric Power Company, give notice that the jointly filed their first supplemental disclosure statement pursuant to Rule 26.1, Ariz. R. Civ. P., and in accordance with the Special Master’s Scheduling Order dated May 19, 2005. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 3 148 7-03-2006 ASARCO LLC’S, ABATIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S ARIZONA WATER COMPANY’S, THE CITY OF PRESCOTT’S, AND TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY’S FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC, Arizona Water Company, Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation, the City of Prescott, and Tucson Electric Power Company, jointly file their first supplemental disclosure statement pursuant to Rule 26.1, Ariz. R. Civ. P., and in accordance with the Special Master’s Scheduling Order dated May 19, 2005. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 10 149 7-05-2006 UNITED STATES FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT SUMMARY: The United States’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of the State of Arizona’s entitlement to a federal reserved water right. CLAIMANT NO: None Given. PAGES: 2 150 7-05-2006 UNITED STATES’ MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT SUMMARY: The United States’ memorandum in support of motion for summary judgment. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 15+31 (attachments)=46(total)




W1-104 Page 17

151 7-05-2006 UNITED STATES’ STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATRIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT SUMMARY: The United States’ statement of undisputed material facts in support of united states’ motion for summary judgment. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 5 152 07-06-2006 ASARCO LLC’S, ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S, ARIZONA WATER COMPANY’S, THE CITY OF PRESCOTT’S, AND TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC, Arizona Water Company, Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation, the City of Prescott, and Tucson Electric Power Company, jointly file their second supplemental disclosure statement pursuant to Rule 26.1, Ariz. R. Civ. P., and in accordance with the Special Master’s Scheduling Order dated May 19, 2005. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 4+1(attachment)=5(total) 153 07-07-2006 STATE’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: The State of Arizona is filing its second supplemental disclosure statement. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 10 154 07-07-2006 NOTICE OF FILING OF STATE OF ARIZONA’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: The State of Arizona notifies parties on the mailing list of In Re State Trust Lands of the filing of its second supplemental disclosure statement. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2 155 07-10-2006 ASARCO LLC’S, ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S, ARIZONA WATER COMPANY’S, THE CITY OF PRESCOTT’S, AND TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC, Arizona Water Company, Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation, the City of Prescott, and Tucson Electric Power Company, jointly file their second supplemental disclosure statement pursuant to Rule 26.1, Ariz. R. Civ. P., and in accordance with the Special Master’s Scheduling Order dated May 19, 2005. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 4+1 exhibit (compact disk)




W1-104 Page 17

156 07-18-2006 NOTICE OF DEPOSITION SUMMARY: Notice that cooperating Claimants will take the deposition of the person whose name is stated below at the time and place stated below before an officer authorized by law to administer oaths. The deposition will be recorded by stenographic means. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2 157 07-18-2006 NOTICE OF DEPOSITION PURSUANT TO RULE 30(b)(6) SUMMARY: Notice that pursuant to Rules 26 and 30, Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, The cooperating Claimants will take the deposition of the person(s) most qualified to testify on behalf of the State Land Department for the State of Arizona on the subject categories listed on the Exhibit A before an officer authorized by law to administer oaths. The deposition will be recorded by stenographic means. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 4 158 07-18-2006 OPPOSING PARTIES’ SECOND SET OF NON-UNIFORM INTERROGATORIES TO STATE OF ARIZONA SUMMARY: Pursuant to Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 33.1, the cooperating Claimants request that the State of Arizona (the “State”) answer the following Interrogatories, under oath, by August 28, 2006. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 11 159 07-24-2006 STATE OF ARIZONA’S CONSOLIDATED REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ITS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ESTABLISHING THE EXISTENCE OF FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS FOR STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: State of Arizona’s Consolidated Reply in support of Its Motion for Leave to Amend Its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Establishing the Existence of Federal Reserved Water Rights for State Trust Land. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 16




W1-104 Page 18

160 08-02-2006 NOTICE OF CORRECTION FOR EXHIBITS TO STATE OF ARIZONA’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SUMMARY: Notice of correction of exhibits A-C attached to the State of Arizona’s Second Supplemental Rule 26.1 disclosure Statement. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 19 161 08-08-2006 ORDER DENYING THE STATE OF ARIZON’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGEMENT SUMMARY: The Special master denies the State of Arizona’s Motion for Leave to Amend Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 5 162 08-10-2006 ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S REVISED MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE EXISTANCE OF FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS FOR STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC and Abitibi Consolidated sales Corporation file their Revised Motion for Partial Summary Judgment regarding the Existence of Federal reserved Water Rights for State Trust Lands, Complying with the Order Granting ASARCO LLC’s and Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation’s Motion to Exceed Page Limitation filed on August 1, 2006.

CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699 et al. PAGES: 30




W1-104 Page19

163 09-15-2006 GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY’S RESPONSE TO THE ARIZONA STATE LAND DEPARTMENT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGEMENT IN RE: STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: Gila River Indian Community submits its Response in Opposition to the Arizona State Land Department’s motion for Partial Summary Judgment in re: State Trust Lands. CLAIMANT NO: 39-11-54-78, et al. PAGES: 28 164 09-15-2006 ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S RESPONSE TO STATE OF ARIZONA’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE EXISTENCE OF FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS FOR STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC and Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation file their response to the State of Arizona’s Motions for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding the Existence of Federal Reserved Water Rights for State Trust Lands. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 10 165 09-15-2006 RESPONSE TO STATE OF ARIZONA’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGEMENT SUMMARY: City of Flagstaff, City of Stafford, and Rio Rico Properties, Inc. file their Response to State of Arizona’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment CLAIMANT NO: 39-U8-40757, et al. PAGES: 16 166 09-15-2006 SEPARATE STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF ITS RESPONSE TO STATE OF ARIZONA’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CONTROVERTING STATEMENT OF FACTS TO STATE OF ARIZONA’S STATEMENT OF FACTS. SUMMARY: City of Flagstaff, City of Stafford, and Rio Rico Properties, Inc. file their Separate Statement of facts in Support of Their Response to State of Arizona’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Controverting Statement of Facts to State of Arizona’s Statement of Facts. CLAIMANT NO: 39-U8-40757, et al. PAGES: 4




W1-104 Page20

167 09-15-2006 JOINT MOVANTS’ RESPONSE TO STATE OF ARIZONA’S MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: Joint Movants submit their response to the State of Arizona’s motion for partial summary judgment with respect to the State’s claims to federal reserved water rights for state trust lands. The Joint Movants include Arizona Public Service Company; BHP Copper Inc.; Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District; the Cities of Chandler, Cottonwood, Glendale, Mesa, Phoenix, Scottsdale, and Show Low; Franklin Irrigation District; Gila Valley Irrigation District; Maricopa-Stanfield irrigation & Drainage District; Phelps Dodge Corporation; Roosevelt Water Conservation District; Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District; Salt River Valley Water user’s Association; and the Towns of Clarkdale and Jerome. CLAIMANT NO: 39-L8-34900, et al. PAGES: 11 +7 (attachments) = 18 (total) 168 09-15-2006 JOINT MOVANTS’ RESPONSE TO STATE OF ARIZONA’S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF FACTS SUMMARY: The Joint Movants submit their response to the State of Arizona’s separate statements of facts associated with the State’s motion for partial summary judgment with respect to the State’s claims to federal reserved water rights for state trust lands. The Joint Movants include Arizona Public Service Company; BHP Copper Inc.; Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District; the Cities of Chandler, Cottonwood, Glendale, Mesa, Phoenix, Scottsdale, and Show Low; Franklin Irrigation District; Gila Valley Irrigation District; Maricopa- Stanfield irrigation & Drainage District; Phelps Dodge Corporation; Roosevelt Water Conservation District; Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District; Salt River Valley Water user’s Association; and the Towns of Clarkdale and Jerome. CLAIMANT NO: 39-L8-34900, et al. PAGES: 12 +7 (attachments) = 19 (total) 169 09-15-2006 PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION’S RESPONSE TO AND JOINDER IN ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S REVISED MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE EXISTENCE OF FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS FOR STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: Phelps Dodge Corporation submits its Response to and joiner in ASARCO LLC’s and Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation’s Revised Motion for Partial Summary Judgment regarding the Existence of Federal reserved Water Rights for State Trust Lands. CLAIMANT NO: 39-62935, et al. PAGES: 3 + 1 (attachment) = 4 (total)




W1-104 Page21

170 09-15-2006 ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S RESPONSE TO GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: LLC’s and Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation FILE their Response to the Gila River Indian Community’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62299, et al. PAGES: 3 171 09-15-2006 STATE OF ARIZONA’S RESPONSE TO OPPOSING CLAIMANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS DOCTRINE TO STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: The State of Arizona submits it Consolidated Response to Opposing Claimants Cross Motions for Summary Judgment regarding the Application of the Federal Water Rights doctrine to state trust lands. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 45 172 09-15-2006 SEPARATE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA’S CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO OPPOSING CLAIMANTS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS DOCTRINE TO STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: The State of Arizona submits its Separate Statement of Facts in support of its Consolidated Response to Opposing Claimants Motion for Summary Judgment opposing the existence of federal reserved water rights for state trust lands. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 9 + 52 (exhibits) = 61 (total) 173 09-20-2006 RESPONSE OF THE NAVAJO NATION TO STATE OF ARIZONA’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ESTABLISHIG THE EXISTENCE OF FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS FOR STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: The Navajo nation files its response to the to the State of Arizona’s motion for Partial Summary Judgment Establishing the Existence of Federal Reserved Water Rights for State Trust lands (Sept. 15, 2006). CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 12




W1-104 Page22

174 09-20-2006 UNITED STATES’ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ESTABLISHING THE EXISTENCE OF FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS FOR STATE TRUST LANDS. SUMMARY: The United States’ response to the State’s motion for partial summary judgment filed Nov. 21, 2002 in the little Colorado River general stream adjudication and June 21, 2004 in the Gila Rive general stream adjudication. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 4 175 09-26-2006 NOTICE OF LOCATION OF ORAL ARGUMENT SUMMARY: The Special Master informs of the courtroom location of the oral argument previously set on Thursday, December 7, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2




W1-104 Page23

176 10-23-2006 ORDER SUMMARY: Order approving the substitution of Susan B. Montgomery and Robyn L. Interpreter, for John H. Ryley, as co-counsel of record for the above-named Tribes as a claimant in these proceedings. Joe P. Sparks remains as co-counsel of record for the Tribes. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 2




W1-104 Page24

177 11-03-2006 STATE OF ARIZONA’S CONSOLIDATED REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS DOCTRINE TO STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: The State of Arizona submits its Consolidated Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding the Application of the Federal Reserved Rights Doctrine To State Trust Lands in Arizona. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 36 178 11-03-2006 ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S REPLY TO STATE OF ARIZONA’S RESPONSE TO OPPOSING CLAIMANT’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS DOCTRINE TO STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC and Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation file their Reply to the State of Arizona’s Response to Opposing Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding the Application of the Federal Reserved Water Rights Doctrine to State Trust lands. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 20 179 11-03-2006 ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S JOINDER IN JOINT MOVANT’S RESPONSE TO STATE’S SEPARATE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS FILED IN SUPPORT OF ITS RESPONSE TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: ASARCO LLC and Abitibi Consolidated Sales Corporation file their Joinder in joint Movants’ Response to State’s Separate Consolidated Statement of Facts Filed in Support of Its Response to Motions for Summary Judgment. CLAIMANT NO: 39-08-62699, et al. PAGES: 2 180 11-03-2006 JOINT MOVANT’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The Joint Movants submit this Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment. The Joint Movants include Arizona Public Service Company; BHP Copper Inc.; Central Arizona irrigation and Drainage District; the Cities of Chandler, Cottonwood, Mesa, Glendale, Phoenix, Scottsdale, and Show Low; Franklin Irrigation District; Gila Valley Irrigation District; Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District; Phelps Dodge Corporation; Roosevelt Water Conservation District; Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District; Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association; and the Towns of Clarkdale and Jerome. CLAIMANT NO: 39-L8-34900 PAGES: 19 + 5 (attachment) = 24 total




W1-104 Page25

181 11-03-2006 JOINT MOVANTS’ RESPONSE TO STATE’S SEPARATE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS FILED IN SUPPORT OF ITS RESPONSE TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The Joint Movants submit their response to the State of Arizona’s September 15, 2006 separate statement of facts associated with the State’s response to summary judgment motions. The Joint Movants include Arizona Public Service Company; BHP Copper Inc.; Central Arizona irrigation and Drainage District; the Cities of Chandler, Cottonwood, Mesa, Glendale, Phoenix, Scottsdale, and Show Low; Franklin Irrigation District; Gila Valley Irrigation District; Maricopa- Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District; Phelps Dodge Corporation; Roosevelt Water Conservation District; Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District; Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association; and the Towns of Clarkdale and Jerome. CLAIMANT NO: 39-L8-34900 PAGES: 7 + 5 (attachment) = 12 total 182 11-03-2006 GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY’S REPLY TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA’S RESPONSE TO OPPOSING CLAIMANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS DOCTRINE TO STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: The Gila River Indian Community submits its Reply to the State of Arizona’s Response to the Opposing Claimants’ Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding the Application of the Federal Reserved Water Rights Doctrine to State Trust Lands. CLAIMANT NO: 39-11-54-78 PAGES: 24 183 11-06-2006 UNITED STATES’ REPLY TO STATE OF ARIZONA’S RESPONSE TO OPPOSING CLAIMANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL RESERVED WATER RIGHTS DOCTRINE TO STATE TRUST LANDS SUMMARY: The United States’ consolidated response filed September 15, 2006 in the little Colorado River general stream adjudication and Gila River general stream adjudication. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 8 184 11-20-2006 ORDER GRANTING ASARCO LLC’S AND ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION’S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION SUMMARY: Order granting Asarco LLc’s and Abitibi Consolidated sales Corporation’s Motion to exceed page limitation CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 1




W1-104 Page26

185 11-20-2006 ORDER GRANTING GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY’S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION SUMMARY: Order granting Gila River Indian Community’s Motion to exceed page limitation CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 1 186 11-28-2006 REPLY OF THE NAVAJO NATION IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SUMMARY: The Navajo Nation files its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment.

CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 10




W1-104 Page 27

187 12-04-2006 STATE OF ARIZONA’S PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER FOR DECEMBER 7, 2006 ORAL ARGUMENT SUMMARY: Proposed Schedule for December 7, 2006 oral Argument. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 4 188 12-04-2006 MOTION OF THE NEW MEXICO COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AS AMICUS CURIAE

SUMMARY: Motion to file Amicus Curiae in support of Arizona State Trust Lands.

CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 23 189 12-05-2006 JOINT MOVANTS’ RESPONSE TO MOTION OF THE NEW MEXICO COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS FOR LEAVE TO FILE AS AMICUS CURIAE

SUMMARY: The Joint Movants submit their response to the motion by the New Mexico Commissioner of Public Lands to file an amicus brief in this proceeding. The Joint Movants contend that the Court should deny the motion. Alternatively, if the motion is granted, the Joint Movants request that the Court allow the Opposing Claimants sufficient time to respond in writing to the amicus filing. The Joint Movants include Arizona Public Service Company; BHP Copper Inc.; Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District; the Cities of Chandler, Cottonwood, Glendale, mesa, Phoenix, Scottsdale, and Show Low; Franklin Irrigation and Drainage District; Gila Valley Irrigation District; Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage district; Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power district; Salt River Valley Users’ Association; and the Towns of Clarkdale and Jerome.

CLAIMANT NO: 39-L8-34900 PAGES: 11 + 25 (attachment) =36 (total) 190 12-05-2006 SUBMISSION BY THE NAVAJO NATION OF PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON DECEMBER 7, 2006 SUMMARY: The Navajo Nation submits a proposed schedule for oral argument. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 4 191 12-06-2006 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION OF THE NEW MEXICO COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AS AMICUS CURIAE

SUMMARY: The Gila River Indian Community submits its Response in Opposition to the Motion of the New Mexico Commissioner of Public Lands for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae.

CLAIMANT NO: 39-11-54-78, et al. PAGES: 7




W1-104 Page 28

192 12-10-2006 MINUTE ENTRY SUMMARY: It was ordered denying the Motion of the New Mexico Commissioner of Public Lands for Leave to File Brief Amicus curiae. CLAIMANT NO: None Given PAGES: 5