12
News News NPES THE ASSOCIATION FOR SUPPLIERS OF PRINTING, PUBLISHING AND CONVERTING TECHNOLOGIES Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 M UST SEE ’EMS tech- nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with the printing industry’s signature event in Chicago—annually called GRAPH EXPO, except every fourth year when the show becomes the quadrennial international PRINT show. Have you ever wondered how the MUST SEE ’EMS program and the judging process works? As the Program Coordinator for this highly anticipated event, I’m pleased to share with you this “behind-the-scenes” look at how the winners are chosen as the products that “must be seen” by visitors to the show in Chicago. It begins in January, when I contact the previous year’s Selection Committee to reconfirm with partici- pating judges. Next, I check in with GASC, which produces the GRAPH EXPO/PRINT shows, to learn about new co-located events that will be held in tandem with the upcoming show; then, I seek out addi- tional judges with expertise related to these new areas. The 2013 MUST SEE PRINT 13 MUST SEE ’EMS Award Winners Named PLUS A LOOK “BEHIND THE SCENES” AT THE MUST SEE ’EMS by Hal Hinderliter, Program Coordinator ’EMS Selection Committee had 32 judges with expertise across nearly every aspect of the printing industry. (Most are household names in the printing industry, but I’ve sworn them all to secrecy in an effort to safeguard their impar- tiality.) This is an elite group of consultants, educators, journal- ists and printers, and we’re lucky to have their assistance! By early April, the new judges are confirmed and I have set up the first round of online ballots for the Legacy ners from the first year of the MUST SEE ’EMS competi- tion (1999). For 2013, the pool was expanded to include two years: 1999 and 2000. Looking ahead, consideration will be extended to all past MUST SEE ’EMS winners in a “three-year window;” in other words, in 2014 candidates under consideration will be winners from 1999-2001; the following year we’ll be looking at 2000-2002. Voting for the Legacy For the PRINT 13 MUST SEE ‘EMS, the 49 winning technologies were selected from a record number of entries submitted by a record number of individual companies, including several crucial innovative technologies that were recognized as MUST SEE ‘EMS for the first time this year. Award. Introduced in 2012, the Legacy Award recognizes one previous MUST SEE ’EMS winner that continues to have an impact on today’s printing industry. Vendors are automat- ically considered based on their status as previous winners. The judges are looking for products that have inspired game-changing innovation in our industry, not just products that have been popular. The pool of nominees for the 2012 Legacy Award was comprised exclusively of win- continued on page 3

Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with

NewsNewsNPES THE ASSOCIATION FOR SUPPLIERS OF PRINTING, PUBLISHING AND CONVERTING TECHNOLOGIES

Volume XXXII, Number 6

AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013

MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product

recognition takes place eachyear in conjunction with theprinting industry’s signatureevent in Chicago—annuallycalled GRAPH EXPO,except every fourth yearwhen the show becomes thequadrennial internationalPRINT show.

Have you ever wonderedhow the MUST SEE ’EMSprogram and the judgingprocess works? As theProgram Coordinator forthis highly anticipated event,I’m pleased to share withyou this “behind-the-scenes”look at how the winners arechosen as the products that“must be seen” by visitors tothe show in Chicago.

It begins in January,when I contact the previousyear’s Selection Committeeto reconfirm with partici-pating judges. Next, Icheck in with GASC, whichproduces the GRAPHEXPO/PRINT shows, tolearn about new co-locatedevents that will be held intandem with the upcomingshow; then, I seek out addi-tional judges with expertiserelated to these new areas.

The 2013 MUST SEE

PRINT 13 MUST SEE ’EMS Award Winners NamedPLUS A LOOK “BEHIND THE SCENES” AT THE MUST SEE ’EMSby Hal Hinderliter, Program Coordinator

’EMS Selection Committeehad 32 judges with expertiseacross nearly every aspect ofthe printing industry. (Mostare household names in theprinting industry, but I’vesworn them all to secrecy in aneffort to safeguard their impar-tiality.) This is an elite group ofconsultants, educators, journal-ists and printers, and we’relucky to have their assistance!

By early April, the newjudges are confirmed and Ihave set up the first round ofonline ballots for the Legacy

ners from the first year of theMUST SEE ’EMS competi-tion (1999). For 2013, the poolwas expanded to include twoyears: 1999 and 2000. Lookingahead, consideration will beextended to all past MUSTSEE ’EMS winners in a“three-year window;” in otherwords, in 2014 candidatesunder consideration will bewinners from 1999-2001; thefollowing year we’ll be lookingat 2000-2002.

Voting for the Legacy

For the PRINT 13 MUST SEE ‘EMS, the 49 winning technologies were selected from a record number of entries submitted by a record number of individual companies, including several crucial innovative technologies that were recognized as MUST SEE ‘EMS for the first time this year.

Award. Introduced in 2012, theLegacy Award recognizes oneprevious MUST SEE ’EMSwinner that continues to havean impact on today’s printingindustry. Vendors are automat-ically considered based on theirstatus as previous winners.The judges are looking forproducts that have inspiredgame-changing innovation inour industry, not just productsthat have been popular.

The pool of nominees forthe 2012 Legacy Award wascomprised exclusively of win-

continued on page 3

NPES News 082113_Layout 1 8/22/13 5:04 PM Page 1

Page 2: Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with

the marketing department to analyze customerdata—you had to ask the sales guy what wasgoing on, and then try to act upon it. In today’smulti-connected world with all sorts of data collec-tion and analysis tools at your fingertips, you candevelop a data-driven marketing organization thatuses customer information to drive effective pro-grams and deliver results.

In order to be successful at data-driven market-ing, you must start with the right culture andphilosophy. At its core, data-driven marketing isabout continuous optimization and repeated im-provement. It’s the deployment of a “test, learn,and adjust” philosophy. You can have the bestdata and technology in the world, but if there’snot the desire to act and to change, then the dataand technology only provide interest as opposed toinsight. You have to act upon that data.

At Kodak, we take our customer data veryseriously. We have invested in the tools, the peopleand the resources to gather data on our customersand execute effective marketing campaigns. Weare continually learning more about our customersand using the information to better serve them—whether to inform them of a relevant trend, invitethem to an educational seminar, introduce themto a new service, or share a successful customerprofile. By feeding their responses back into oursystem, we become smarter about what they areinterested in and where they currently reside inthe selling cycle.

Data-driven marketing also requires integrat-ing data from multiple resources. NPES suppliesvaluable market data and print studies that you asa member can access to better understand themarket and position your company accordingly.NPES Market Data, Printing and SuppliesShipment Data, and the “World-Wide Market forPrint” study, to name a few, can aid your manage-ment decisions and help to develop your productplanning, strategy, and market developmentactivities. NPES also supplies competitive analy-sis, technology impact, and other factors that canprove to be invaluable in forecasting and go-to-market strategies.

So my advice for NPES members is to lookinto the advantages of data-driven marketing and

CHAIRMAN’S PERSPECTIVE

Chris Payne, NPES Chairman

I have always believed thatthe more you know about

your customers, the better youcan serve them, resulting in awin-win situation for bothparties. In the old days, perti-nent information was mostlykept at the salesperson/cus-tomer relationship level. Therewas no really efficient way for

Big Data—UtilizingData in ManagementDecisions

determine if you have the right mix of philoso-phy and culture to effectively implement acompany-wide program. If you do, begin tobuild the appropriate tools and outside re-sources you’ll need to get the job done. Withthe right combination of philosophy, commit-ment and market data tools, you have thefoundation for a successful program that willnot only make you better informed about yourcustomers and the markets you serve, it maymake you richer too.

ISSUE HIGHLIGHTSNew PRIMIR Study ExamineseCommerce Adoption........................................ 4One on One: Gavin Jordan-Smith .................. 6GAERF Awards Student Scholarshipsto Compete in SkillsUSA Championship........ 7Celebrating 33 Years of Serviceto NPES—Kip Smythe ........................................8NPES Supports Transatlantic Tradeand Investment Partnership..............................9NPES 2013 Annual Conference........................9Long-Term Capital Equipment PatternsReflect Change in Industry Sales Mix,Economic Shocks, and Competition ..............10NPES Tackles “Patent Trolls” Menace ..........11Market Intelligence News:UCC Filing Update .......................................... 12Calendar ............................................................ 12

2

Nominations Now Open forNPES 2013 GegenheimerAwards

Nominations are now open for the Harold W.

Gegenheimer Awards for Industry Service,

which will be presented during the NPES

2013 Annual Conference, November 11-12

at the Hyatt Regency Grand Cypress,

Orlando, Florida.

These prestigious awards, named in honor of

the former Chairman of Baldwin Technology

Company and former President of NPES, are

presented annually to one NPES member

company, and one individual employed by a

member, in recognition of their leadership and

commitment to building a strong future for

the printing and publishing industry and its

suppliers.

Nominations for the Individual and Corporate

Service Awards may be made by the delegate

of any NPES member company. For complete

award criteria, and to download a Nomination

Form, visit: www.npes.org/members/

gegenheimerawards.aspx.

NPES News 082113_Layout 1 8/22/13 5:04 PM Page 2

Page 3: Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with

3

continued from page 1

Award is completed byJune. Our 2013 LegacyAward winner has al-ready been selected andnotified—but won’t bepublicly revealed until an-nounced at the pre-showEXECUTIVE OUT-LOOK conference onSeptember 7, 2013.

By the end of Aprilthe online entry submis-sion goes “live” and thecall for MUST SEE ’EMS entries is announced. Oncesubmission is closed (typically in June) online ballotsare prepared and invitations for the judges to review theballots e-mailed. The judges have less than three weeksto review all the entries—in 2013 more than 130!

Once the judging closes, I analyze the scores to deter-mine which products are considered “winners.” Thehighest-scoring winner from each category receives the“Best of Category” award to be announced at EXECU-TIVE OUTLOOK. When the winners are determined,I gather images for the pre-show MUST SEE ’EMSwebinar and notify the winning entrants.

Our industry owes much to the dedicated effortsand innovative spirit of our exhibiting suppliers, andthe annual MUST SEE ’EMS program is a fittingopportunity to recognize their valuable contributions.Find out more at: www.mustseeems.com.

CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL PRINT 13 MUST SEE ‘EMS WinnersSales and Order EntryEFI – EFI IQuoteHybrid Software – Hybrid Software FaceliftKonica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A. – EngageIT Automation

Prepress and PremediaCGS – IC3D SuiteEnfocus – Enfocus Connect ALLGMG Americas – GMG ProductionSuite 2.0Recosoft Corporation – PDF2ID Enterprise 2012

Color Management and Quality ControlEFI – EFI Fiery Color Profiler Suite v4.5GTI Graphic Technology, Inc. – Soft View Model SOFV-1xiQMASTERWORK USA INC. – MK420MINI Full Automatic Sheet Inspection MachineXerox Corporation – Xerox IntegratedPLUS Automated Color Management

Variable, Transactional and Multi-ChannelRicoh – Ricoh Critical Communications Solutions SuiteTransformations – Uluro uDeliverTransformations – Uluro uSecureXerox Corporation – Xerox FreeFlow Digital PublisherXMPie, Inc. – XMPie Circle

Pressroom: Analog Presses ACTEGA Kelstar – UltraSheen UV-8820STAir Motion Systems, Inc. and AMS UV – UV LED XP5 SERIESGoss International – Magnum Compact Press Autoplate SystemMark Andy, Inc. – Mark Andy Performance Series flexo printing presses

Pressroom: Digital PressesAllen Datagraph Systems, Inc. – AXXIS HS Digital Label System Fujifilm North America Corporation – Graphium Konica Minolta and Komori Corporation – KM-1/IS29 Inkjet PressXante Corporation – Impressia Digital Multi-Media PressXerox Corporation – Impika iPrint Compact 24-24Xerox Corporation – Xerox iGen4 Diamond Edition

Pressroom: Wide-FormatCanon Solutions America – Océ Arizona 660 XTCanon Solutions America – Océ ColorWave 900EFI – EFI VUTEk GS-TF SystemEFI – EFI VUTEk HS100 ProXante Corporation – Excelagraphix 4200 P Series, High Speed Wide Format Inkjet

Postpress and In-line FinishingAllen Datagraph Systems, Inc. – AXXIS HS Digital Die-less Label Finishing SystemC.P. Bourg, Inc. – Bourg BB3202 Perfect BinderLasX Industries, Inc. – LaserSharp On-Demand Finishing SystemMASTERWORK USA INC. – MK21060STE Foil Stamping/Diecutting Combination w/StrippingMGI Digital Graphic Technology – JETvarnish 3D Twin w/iFoilMuller Martini – Presto II Digital Saddle Stitcher

Imprinting, Mailing, Shipping and FulfillmentPitney Bowes – Print+ Response Inkjet ModulePrintware LLC – iJetPress Digital Inkjet Printer with iJetColor WorkflowRISO, Inc. – RISO Inline Print to Mail SolutionW+D North America, Inc. – W+D 234d BP

Management SystemsAvanti – Avanti SlingshotEFI – EFI Complete Integrated Workflow for InkjetEFI – EFI Radius Business Intelligence v5SpencerLab Digital Color Laboratory – SpencerMetrics iDPA PLUSUltimate Technographics, Inc. – Ultimate Bindery v.3

The Future of Print: Technology DemonstrationsAccuZIP, Inc. – AccuTrace with LIVINGMAILEFI – EFI GlossControlEFI – EFI SmartSign Analytics

Standards Updates

A new feature of the NPES Standards Program is

the Standards Update, which will bring you the latest

information on the activities of national and inter-

national standards development including the work

being done in CGATS, B65, ISO/TC130 and the ICC. In

addition, each issue includes a list of recently pub-

lished standards, news on events of interest in the

printing industry and links to other standards news.

Look for the July/August issue of the Standards Up-

date in the Standards Workroom at: www.npes.org.

Hal Hinderliter

NPES News 082113_Layout 1 8/22/13 5:04 PM Page 3

Page 4: Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with

and efficiency not previouslyimagined. Some profited by thisinnovation; however most printproviders are still watching fromthe sidelines and may thus riskextinction.

The study noted that eCom-merce print business models canavert deficiencies that are inher-

ent in the traditional printservice provider businessmodels including over-capacity,pricing pressure and a difficultyto differentiate in the market-place. Print eCommerce alsoexpands the geographic bound-aries in which a print providercan serve.

Today’s advancements in

4

New PRIMIR Study Examines eCommerce AdoptionDIFFERENTIATION IS THE KEY

tronic, file-based desktop pub-lishing in the 1980s and 1990s.

The dot-com explosion in the1990s provided opportunityand capital to develop softwarethat enabled print producers,sellers, and resellers to connectwith print buyers—from largeenterprise businesses to individ-

ual consumers. In the 2000s,eCommerce adoption and inno-vation accelerated and someprinters realized they couldharness the power of the Webto reach a broader demographicand geographic audience.

They could also providemore targeted services to cus-tomers by enabling automation

PRIMIR’s new study, “eCom-merce and Print Business

Models,” evaluates the impact ofeCommerce technology on thebusiness models of print serviceproviders and explores howNPES members might supportthe transition into eCommerce.The study was conducted by

InfoTrends for PRIMIR.eCommerce is pushing the

evolution of the printing indus-try in new directions. The in-herent nature of much of thework that print service pro-viders produce lends itself wellto be offered through an eCom-merce model, especially sincethe industry shifted to elec-

In the 2000s, eCommerce adoption and innovation accelerated and some printers realized they could harness the power of the Web to reach a broader demographic and geographic audience.‘‘

cloud computing, social media,mobile devices, and analyticstechnologies have seriouslychallenged the role of the print-ing industry in the media supplychain. The PRIMIR studyfollows eCommerce adoption inthe printing industry, reviewsnew business models, providescase studies, and examinesconsiderations for printers andsuppliers as they explore newpossibilities.

Let’s explore specific oppor-tunities for equipment andsupplies manufacturers to sup-port their customers’ transitionto an online presence.

ConsiderationsAside from a clear business

strategy that supports moving toan online model, printers mustalso evaluate capital expenseand operating expense consider-ations. Pressroom automation isan important factor. However, akey component of any eCom-merce solution is software.

As shown in Exhibit 1, printeCommerce is forecast to growas printers implement eCom-merce thus allowing them toseek opportunities to servecurrent as well as new cus-tomers. Demonstrating theoverall interest of print serviceproviders to purchase or sub-scribe to these solutions, thePRIMIR study noted that printeCommerce software revenuefor vendors is growing. Infact, this software segment

Exhibit 1

NPES News 082113_Layout 1 8/22/13 5:04 PM Page 4

Page 5: Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with

endeavor as they review:• Top-line costs to start an

eCommerce print service offer-ing based on different marketsegments and intended audi-ences, including potential soft-ware and hardware investments.Job complexity is an importantfactor when considering mar-kets to pursue. Exhibit 2 identi-fies products that lend them-selves well to eCommerce.

• The software purchasedecision path to find the righttech nology to support their

5

is expected to rise from $279million in 2011 to $525 millionin 2016—a Compound AnnualGrowth Rate (CAGR) of 13.5%.

The adoption rate for printeCommerce software is onlyaround 50% even in the mostmature markets, thus, there isstill plenty of opportunity for ad-ditional growth and new players.

Growth Drivers• The movement from home-

grown solutions to commercialofferings

and enterprise print procure-ment platforms, and

• Continued adoption ofdigital, short-run, personalizedprinting along with growth inWeb-enabled book printing,photo publishing, educationalbooks, and custom publishing.

Vendors should note that dueto the prevalence of Software-as-a-Service (SaaS), businesseshave less desire to make up-front capital investments andmay be more inclined to sub-scribe to an SaaS solution.

cloud computing and SaaS,andInvestigating examples of eCommerce implementa-tions for custom and pack-aged services.

Printers Will also Need to:

• Examine manufacturingprocesses for print eCommerceincluding automation, standardi-zation, mass customization, andthe role that different printingprocesses play within the eCom-merce print services market, and

• Explore similarities anddifferences between manu-facturing processes foreCommerce print providersand traditional print providers,as well as the role that targetcustomers play, if any, in deter-mining those processes.

The study concludes that thebargaining power of suppliers isa moderate threat due to thesheer number of competitorsand a supplier’s ability to back-ward integrate with eCommerceplatforms. Differentiation willbe key.

NPES members will findopportunity by differentiatingthemselves through businessmodels, services and solutionsthat provide increased efficiencyand greater benefits to printproviders and ultimately theircustomers.

The “eCommerce and PrintBusiness Models” study wasrecently circulated to allPRIMIR members. ForPRIMIR membership infor-mation contact Jackie Blandat e-mail: [email protected] visit www.primir.org.

• Strong interest from globalservice providers to diversifyinto eCommerce print services

• Growing demand for multi-ple, varied print eCommerce so-lutions to meet customers’ needs

• Demand from enterprisecustomers to use online orderingtools, brand management tools,

As printers explore e-Com-merce offerings, they will needto examine not only the oppor-tunities, but also the barriers toentry and the various capital in-vestment and operating expenseconsiderations. NPES memberscan provide a valuable serviceby assisting them in their

eCommerce offerings in makingdecisions around the “build, buy,or partner” scenario including:

Determining IT require-ments for static, custom-ized, and personalized print products offered via eCommerceUnderstanding the role of

Exhibit 2

NPES News 082113_Layout 1 8/22/13 5:04 PM Page 5

Page 6: Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with

6

As the printing industry consolidates,how have your most progressivecustomers adapted to remain competitiveand profitable?

The talk about consolidation in our indus-try has transitioned into a reality that manyprogressive printers are finding impossible toignore. My company focuses on helping ourcustomers do more with their investment,irrespective of the equipment and servicesthat they provide and that we support.

In our highly competitive environment,focus must be an inherent characteristic ofany organization’s culture as it thinks aheadto invest in new services. It’s easy to be ex-cited about something new, but making thatnew thing successful is the crucial elementon which we should all be focused. Such atransformation is often seen as a key attributeof being progressive, yet the actions neededto bring about change are born of leadershipand the willingness to do something com-pletely different when necessary.

No one formula can make it all happen forevery company. Each print service providerhas unique characteristics and understandingthem is essential to an equipment manufac-

turer delivering value as a partner to that customer. We haveto understand that business development can take manyforms—sales training, software investment, new service of-ferings, acquisitions, and more. Depending upon a company’sfocus, the formula for one printer may simply be a variation ofthese strategies and it’s our job at Konica Minolta to listenand provide the right advice.

While innovation is a much-hyped word these days, insome fields it is an everyday requirement; how doesKonica Minolta build innovation into its business model?

I always get excited about innovation. Today the technol-ogy platform—printer hardware—is secondary to the solu-tions platform embedded within it. Expanding our efforts onthe solutions product planning side will help us innovate ourdevices and solve real problems for our customers. It’sthrough enabling our devices to be connected to workflowsand front-end solutions that we can help increase profitabilityfor our customers.

Sparking the need for continuous innovation are the manyfactors affecting the decline of print volume around the world.Converging technologies, such as mobile, cross-media, web-to-print, variable data print, automated document factories,and more are being realized today, because increasingly we,as consumers, prefer to be communicated with electronicallyand congregate online in social media portals.

The new technology convergence, however, is businessprocess automation. It’s what’s behind the new value propo-sition—EnvisionIT Production—that Konica Minolta brings toits customers. We see this as providing meaningful impactthat helps our customers become successful, and innovationthat helps our customers grow in their investment for tech-nology, software, solutions, and also services to help drivenon-print-related work. Furthermore, our sales channels areexpanding their educational investment by an individualizedconsultative approach to support our customers through acombination of services that deliver tangible results.

From desktop to print shop, production print solutionsare already multifunctional; what new technology solu-tions do you see on the horizon?

A lot of new ideas are being born from various con-cepts—Big Data, Mobility, and Cloud—that are resonatingthroughout our industry and everyone is on the bandwagon,equipment manufacturers and independent software vendorsalike. I like to think that there is still some time before any

one of these will make any significant impact.To make a difference in a print serviceprovider’s business, it has to become easier,less costly and a tangible service offeringwhere revenue and savings can be drawn.

Today, Konica Minolta is heavily focused indelivering simple solutions leveraging theseconcepts. We are investing in our open solu-tions platform, which is embedded into ourtechnology platform opening up the path to de-livering connected software solutions. This yearwe launched a new portal—bizhub Market-Place—as an environment to procure theseapplications. We recently launched Cloud con-nectors that bring together Cloud storage envi-ronments for print service providers. In thein-plant segment, we are integrating solutionsthat give greater visibility and control to theprint environment. And, we are launching sim-ple applications monthly, targeting print serviceproviders. The future of innovation is how ap-plications start connecting Big Data, Mobilityand Cloud with business automation.

You have been active in NPES and otherindustry groups for many years. Why andwhat key benefits do you derive from thatengagement?

For Konica Minolta, it’s rather what wewould not have if we weren’t involved, thanwhat we do get from being active. Simply put,engaging in industry associations and groupshelps to promote growth in the graphic com-munications business. With a customer-fo-cused approach, our activity in these keyindustry groups helps guide our decisions forinvestment, partnership and new development.

If I were to pinpoint what we get from lead-ing organizations like NPES, it would be “col-laborative consumption.” An emergingbuzzword, which I take to mean industry lead-ers and competitors consuming informationcollaboratively helps to provide executablevalue for our customers. Our challenge is toconvert this into business outcomes that benefitour customers and our company worldwide.

One on One with GAVIN JORDAN-SMITH

Gavin Jordan-Smith is Vice President,

Solutions and Production Planning,

Business Intelligence Services for

Konica Minolta Business Solutions

U.S.A., Inc. Previously, he held key

strategic leadership positions within

Xerox Corporation, most recently as

Vice President, Production Workflow

and Solutions, Enterprise Business

Group.

Jordan-Smith is a 20-year veteran of

the graphic communications industry

in the United States and United King-

dom. He currently serves on the NPES

Board of Directors.

NPES News 082113_Layout 1 8/22/13 5:04 PM Page 6

Page 7: Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with

7

GAERF awarded nearly $30,000 in scholarships to participating students.

This year at the SkillsUSA Champi-onships held June 25-28, 2013 in

Kansas City, MO, the Graphic Arts Ed-ucation and Research Foundation(GAERF) awarded nearly $30,000 inscholarships to participating advertisingdesign, graphic communications andscreen printing technology students.

SkillsUSA is a national nonprofitmembership organization serving morethan 320,000 teachers and the highschool and college students, who arepreparing for careers in trade, technicaland skilled service occupations. Amongits many programs, SkillsUSA holds anannual National Leadership and SkillsConference, where more than 15,000people—including students, teachersand business partners—participate inthe week-long event to showcase the topcareer and technical education studentsin the nation.

This national conference includes the

GAERF Awards Student Scholarships toCompete in SkillsUSA Championships2013 MEDALISTS ANNOUNCED

Congratulations SkillsUSA

2013 Champions

Graphic Communications Medalists

Secondary School• Gold: Ben Ellsworth, S & W Washtenaw Consortium, Saline, MI • Silver: Jackie Nowatarski, Berks Career Technology Center – West Campus, Leesport, PA

• Bronze: Kristopher Nixon, Dubiski Career High School, Grand Prairie, TX

Post-secondary School• Gold: Jovie Camarce, Riverside Community College, Riverside, CA

• Silver: David Watson, Illinois Central College, East Peoria, IL• Bronze: Shelby Johnson, Tulsa Technology Center – Lemley Campus,Tulsa, OK

Advertising and Design Medalists

Secondary School• Gold: Spencer Smith, Kettering-Fairmont High School, Kettering, OH

• Silver: Emily Westerback, Montachusett Regional Vocational Technical School, Fitchburg, MA

• Bronze: Philip Gemmell, Chester County Technical College High School, Downington, PA

Post-secondary School• Gold: Nathan Ribelin, Riverside Community College, Riverside, CA

• Silver: Shane O’Brien, Des Moines Area Community College, Ankeny, IA

• Bronze: Mercedes Montgomery, Rolla Technical Institute, Rolla, MO

Screen Printing Technology Medalists

Secondary School• Gold: Rachel Rock, Sammamish High School, Bellevue, WA • Silver: Dasean Stokes, Waynesville Career Center, Waynesville, MO

• Bronze: Nicole Welsh, Delcastle Technical High School, Wilmington, DE

Post-secondary School• Gold: Patrick Wadleigh, Waynesville Career Center, Waynesville, MO

• Silver: Julianne Abrams, Ocean County Vo-Tech High School, Brick Town, NJ

• Bronze: Nicholas Hill, Chowan University, Murfreesboro, NC

Graphic Communications participants were among nearly 6,000 contestants competing in 98 different trade, technical and leadership contests.

‘‘SkillsUSA Championships, whichthis year hosted nearly 6,000 contest-ants—all state contest winners—competing in 98 different trade,technical, and leadership contests.Its purpose is to reward studentsfor excellence, directly involveindustry in evaluating studentperformance, and provide trainingrelevant to employers’ needs. Tothat end, the exhibition, whichoccupies a space equivalent to 16football fields, is held with theassistance and support of morethan 1,100 industry, trade associa-tions and labor organizations.

Support for this year’s GraphicCommunications contest was pro-vided by Baumfolder Corporation;Boelte-Hall, Inc.; GAERF; Heidel-berg USA; Printing Industries ofAmerica; Quad Graphics; Ricoh; R.R. Donnelly; and, Xerox.

Hands-on training from industry experts is a big part of the SkillsUSAChampionships experience.

Red jackets all around for the championship medalists!Attention to the smallest detail is required to win one of the covetedmedals.

NPES News 082113_Layout 1 8/22/13 5:04 PM Page 7

Page 8: Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with

(From l to r) Pictured during the 2012 visit by a Government Delegation from India to NPESare Dr. Ashok Singhvi, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development; A. K. Sinha, Directorof Printing; Kip Smythe, Vice President, Global Programs, NPES; Mike Paschall, Vice Presi-dent of Sales & Marketing, Kempsmith Machine Company; and, (front)Mrs. Sinha.

8

Recently the NPES familycelebrated Kip Smythe’s

33 years with our organizationand, at the same time, saidfarewell, not goodbye, as Kipheads out to another chapterof his life and rides off to hisbeloved Arizona home, wherehe will continue to work as a

consultant to the industry and tothe organization that he helpedshape, mold and influence.

Turn back the clock toAugust 1980, which was whenWilliam “Kip” Smythe, Jr.joined our organization asDirector of Member Services.When he started at NPES in hisearly 30s, Kip brought with himthe drive, versatility and energythat would go on to help shapeeverything from our PRINTOUTLOOK Conference andMarket Data Program to ourmarket research efforts andour international services andprograms. Add to all this theguidance of our standardsprograms and his role as execu-tive secretary of the Interna-tional Color Consortium andwe can certainly say thatWilliam “Kip” Smythe, Jr.

gave everything to ensure thesuccess, versatility and effec-tiveness of our programs andservices for our members.

industry. His knowledge ofour industry is tremendous.His quiet, unassuming, oftendry humor and wit cannot bereplaced. As a teacher andmentor, his folksy, charmingmanner—and let’s not forgetthat sharp intellect—has en-couraged and supported manyof us in our careers. As thesefew images show a small part ofthe diverse role he served overthose 33 years, we’d all like tosay, “It’s been and will continueto be a pleasure, Kip.” Go westyoung man!

NPES owes enormous thanks and gratitude to Kip for his dedication and commitment to our members and our industry.‘‘Celebrating 33 Years

of Service to NPESKIP SMYTHE—THE NEXT CHAPTER

Needless to say Kip ishighly renowned in our industry,earning many honors and trib-utes over the years. The mostrecent being the 2013 Meritor-ious Service Award that ANSIwill bestow upon Kip Wednes-day, October 2nd at the New-seum in Washington, D.C.

NPES owes enormousthanks and gratitude to Kipfor his dedication and commit-ment to our members and our

Kip Smythe (r)with former NPES Chairman William E. Sherman (c) and Leslee Wheeler (l).

William “Kip” Smythe joins NPES in 1980:the “Kipster” in the making.

And on to the next chapter…

Kip Smythe at his induction into the Soder-strom Society, with former NAPL ChairmanLou Brand at the NAPL SoderstromAwards, October 9, 1995.

NPES News 082113_Layout 1 8/22/13 5:04 PM Page 8

Page 9: Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with

November 11-12, 2013

Hyatt Regency Grand Cypress

Orlando, Florida

View the program and REGISTER today!

www.npes.org

9

NPES agrees with the Working Group’s conclusion that an agreement that deals compre-hensively with bilateral trade, investment and regulatory issues, while contributing to thedevelopment of global rules, would provide the most significant mutual benefit.‘‘NPES Supports Transatlantic

Trade and Investment Partnership

In a letter addressed to Ambassador Demetrios Marantis, Acting United

States Trade Representative, NPES stated its support of the proposed Transat-

lantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), which is in harmony with, and

advances NPES’s longstanding support of free and fair trade. As the United

States-European Union High Level Working Group on Jobs and Growth (Work-

ing Group) noted in its June 19, 2012 Interim Report:

“…transatlantic trade and investment are the backbone of the world

economy. Together, the European Union (E.U.) and the United States (U.S.)

account for nearly half of world GDP and 30% of world trade. Each day,

goods and services worth $2.7 billion/€2.0 billion are traded bilaterally,

promoting economic growth and supporting millions of jobs in both

economies. In addition, the United States and the E.U. have directly in-

vested more than $3.7 trillion/€ 2.8 trillion on both sides of the Atlantic.”

In light of the magnitude of these statistics and with the enormous potential

for even greater economic growth in mind, NPES agrees with the Working

Group’s conclusion that an agreement that deals comprehensively with bilat-

eral trade, investment and regulatory issues, while contributing to the develop-

ment of global rules, would provide the most significant mutual benefit to both

the U.S. and the E.U.

Therefore, as negotiations commence, NPES has indicated its support of

the following as key objectives of the TTIP:

• Enhanced compatibility of regulations and standards

• Elimination or reduction of conventional barriers to trade in goods, such

as tariffs and tariff-rate quotas

• Elimination, reduction, or prevention of barriers to trade in goods,

services, and investment

• Elimination, reduction, or prevention of unnecessary “behind-the-border”

non-tariff barriers to trade in all categories

• Effective enforcement mechanisms that reinforce protection of

intellectual property rights, and provide appropriately strong sanctions

designed to deter violations of those rights, and

• Enhanced cooperation for the development of rules and principles on

global issues of common concern and also for the achievement of shared

global economic goals.

To view NPES’s full letter in support of the Transatlantic Trade and

Investment Partnership visit: www.npes.org/TTIP_Comments.

For more information contact NPES Government Affairs Director Mark J.

Nuzzaco at phone: 703/264-7235 or e-mail: [email protected].

REGISTER NOW

NO EXCUSES          LEADERSHIP

N P E S 2 0 1 3 A N N U A L C O N F E R E N C E

Keynote: No Excuses Leadership

Jay Rifenbary, President, Rifenbary Training & Development

The Economy: Outlook 2014

Dr. Ken Mayland, President, ClearView Economics, LLC

World-wide Market for Print: Identifying Global Opportunities

for the Print Industry

Alex Chan, Senior Analyst, Custom Research Americas Economist Intelligence Unit

A Customer’s View of Our World

Keith Kemp, President, Xerographic Digital Printing Past Chairman, NAPL

NPES News 082113_Layout 1 8/22/13 5:04 PM Page 9

Page 10: Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with

10

Long-Term Capital Equipment Patterns Reflect Change in Industry Sales Mix, Economic Shocks, and CompetitionBy Dr. Joe Webb

Printing industry capital expenditures have always had a strongrelationship with printing shipments. Because most print busi-

nesses are privately held enterprises selling relatively undifferenti-ated products, management according to near-term cash flow hasbeen common. Therefore, when printing industry shipments de-cline, as they have in the digital media era, one would expect capi-tal expenditures to change as well.

Economic pressures, technological change, and new forms ofmedia competition have all played a part in changing the relation-ship of industry shipments and capital investment.

In 1998, a relatively strong year for commercial print in thatdecade, 4.9% of shipments was spent on capital investments, orapproximately $7 billion in today’s dollars. By 2011, the percent-age had gradually fallen to 3%, or under $3 billion. The data re-flect the disappearance of dedicated prepress equipment intosoftware, workflow, and communications technologies, as well as

Economic pressures, technological change, and new forms of media competition have all played a part in changing the relationship of industry shipments and capital investment.‘‘

the reduced demand for big ticket purchases such as heatset weboffset, gravure, and other long run length production equipment.

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) disrupt traditional capitalpurchase patterns by shifting resources from the industry’sproduction infrastructure to the purchase of companies.

Figure 1 shows how the ratio of shipments and capital expendi-tures has changed over the years, but also illustrates how thosepurchases are split between used and new.

The data show occasional bursts of used equipment purchases.When printers start to consider the purchase of new equipment,one of the places they look first is the used equipment market.It’s not because the equipment is used, it’s because the economicstruggles of print businesses have often resulted in the displace-ment of relatively new equipment.

The amount of used equipment purchases in a particular year isrelated to its availability. When there is an increase in the numberof print business closures, that equipment comes to market. Whenleases go bad and the equipment is repossessed, that equipmentends up in the used equipment market. Economic distress makesused equipment sales rise. Because printers are inclined to checkused equipment sources first, this is not a surprise. “Young” usedequipment is usually a good deal. Sometimes printers seek usedequipment because they want a particular model similar to whatthey already own. This gives them the benefit of minimized down-time for employee training and ensures smooth operations as thatequipment is integrated into their shop.

The printing business is also consolidating. While the late1990s had print businesses selling at very high prices, that is notthe case now. In the ’90s, companies were often purchased fortheir equipment, facilities, and liabilities. As the print business haschanged, there has been a greater emphasis on “tuck-ins.” In thistype of purchase, the acquiring company is just looking for accessto a customer base rather than buying the whole company. Thisoften leads to abandoned equipment, or equipment tied up inbankruptcy. Used equipment is cheaper, abandoned equipment ischeaper yet. This further reduces the price, which means that youcan’t use the data in the chart to say in 2011 that “only 6.5% ofcapital equipment expenditures were for used equipment, so it’s atiny market.” Source: Based on U.S. Dept. of Commerce Annual Survey of Capital Expenditures NAICS 323; analysis ©2013 Strategies for Management, Inc.

Figure 1

Capital Equipment Capex as % ofNew Capex Used CapexExpenditures ‘98-‘11 Shipments

1998 4.9% 91.5% 8.5%1999 4.3% 94.6% 5.4%2000 4.0% 95.7% 4.3%2001 3.6% 92.6% 7.4%2002 4.1% 80.1% 19.9%2003 4.0% 88.1% 11.9%2004 3.7% 94.0% 6.0%2005 3.6% 96.4% 3.6%2006 3.6% 96.5% 3.5%2007 4.2% 96.2% 3.8%2008 4.0% 94.4% 5.6%2009 3.1% 83.7% 16.3%2010 2.9% 95.9% 4.1%2011 3.0% 93.5% 6.5%

Mean 1998-2011 3.8% 92.4% 7.6%

Mean 1998-2004 4.1% 90.9% 9.1%Mean 2005-2011 3.5% 93.8% 6.2%

Dr. Joe Webb

NPES News 082613_Layout 1 8/26/13 12:37 PM Page 10

Page 11: Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with

11

This means that even though capital equip-ment purchases as a percentage of sales maybe going down, the number of units of equip-ment being sold or purchased may not be de-clining as much. Most displaced equipmentfinds a new home, eventually.

There is always the concern that usedequipment sales prevent a new equipmentsale. This is why there is often a desire tomove old equipment that has been traded inas part of a new equipment sale out of theNorth American marketplace. Years ago,trade-ins in the U.S. would head to Asia,Africa, Central or South America. Now theseregions are buying new equipment, or leapingto other technologies, such as skipping offsetand starting immediately down the digitalprinting path.

That said, there are times when usedequipment is a means of saving funds formainstream operations and preserving fundsfor new equipment purchases. This is ex-tremely important when there is a technologychange and used equipment becomes a meansof transition from the old to the new.

Mergers and acquisitions tend to depressnew equipment purchases. First, they divertresources to the purchase of the business andits financing. Second, merged companies“cherry pick” equipment involved in themerger, keeping the best and discarding theunneeded, thus reducing the dollars availablefor the latest equipment.

One of the justifications for printer M&Amay be the avoidance of new capital expendi-tures. That is, companies may have consid-ered purchasing the same new equipment, butonce merged, only one purchase is needed.

In the long term, used equipment is ameans of the industry preserving its capitaland dispersing scarce resources efficiently.Changes in patterns of capital investments area reflection of industry conditions, economicfactors, and adaptation to changes in demand,especially new communications competitors. Dr. Joe Webb, Director of WhatTheyThink.com's Economicsand Research Center, and, President, Strategies for Manage-ment, Inc. is one of the graphic arts industry's best-known con-sultants, forecasters, and commentators. www.drjoewebb.com

NPES Tackles “Patent Trolls” MenaceLike a summer derecho, the issue of “Patent

Trolls” blew up in early June and NPES has

weighed in to help stop calculated, abusive and

costly assertions of questionable patent rights

against printers and their suppliers. This aggres-

sive practice is not new or novel, but it has

reached new heights in recent times.

Founded in the Constitution, the U.S. patent

system’s purpose is to provide a powerful incen-

tive for innovation, by securing for a limited time

authors’ and inventors’ exclusive rights in their

writings and discoveries. However, this incentive

and the patent rights that protect it must be

carefully limited so as not to retard future inno-

vation. Excessive enforcement of exclusivity

through abusive litigation or overly broad patent

claims, which often result in reduced innovation,

income and jobs for the American economy,

must be stopped.

Not all firms that own patents “practice”

them, i.e., employ them in making products;

nevertheless, some of these firms play an impor-

tant role in facilitating creative new value in the

economy by connecting manufacturers with in-

ventors. However, others known as Patent Asser-

tion Entities (PAEs, or “patent trolls”) instead use

aggressive litigation tactics such as threatening

to sue thousands of companies at once without

specific evidence of infringement against any of

them; creating shell companies that mask from

defendants who is suing them; and, asserting

overly broad patent rights to extract unwar-

ranted settlements.

According to a June 2013 White House re-

port, lawsuits brought by patent trolls have

tripled in just the last two years, rising from 29%

to 62% of all infringement cases. The report also

asserts that PAEs may have threatened over

100,000 companies with patent infringement

last year alone. And while patent trolls hurt firms

of all sizes, the majority of PAE lawsuits target

small and inventor-driven companies. In addi-

tion, PAEs are increasingly targeting end users of

products, including a number of firms in the

printing industry.

The White House report also explains that

PAEs take advantage of uncertainty about the

scope or validity of patent claims, especially in

software-related patents, due to the relative

novelty of the technology, and because it has

been difficult to separate the “function” of the

software, for example producing an image, from

the “means” by which that function is accom-

plished. In the printing industry these assertions

have alleged patent violations of networked

computer-to-plate (CTP) workflow technology,

and have demanded licenses starting at

$75,000 and up to avoid even more costly

patent infringement litigation.

Both President Obama and Congress are

taking steps designed to reduce if not eliminate

the rapidly growing menace of patent trolls.

Specifically, House and Senate Judiciary Com-

mittee Chairmen Congressman Robert W. Good-

latte (R-6-VA) and Senator Patrick J. Leahy

(D-VT) have developed a bipartisan, bicameral

legislative Patent Discussion Draft that includes

provisions dealing with federal court proce-

dures, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office prac-

tices, and improvements to the Leahy-Smith

America Invents Act. Legislation is anticipated

this summer.

For his part, President Obama has an-

nounced a series of legislative recommenda-

tions and indicated his administration’s

willingness to work with Congress, and he has

also unilaterally issued a set of Executive ac-

tions to help bring about greater transparency to

the patent system and level the playing field for

innovators.

NPES is coordinating its response to patent

trolls with NPES members and other groups in

the printing industry, and is most receptive to in-

formation about specific instances of patent troll

abuses.

For more information see: www. npes.org/

Portals/0/pdf/WhiteHouse_ on_PatentTrolls.pdf

or contact NPES Government Affairs Director

Mark J. Nuzzaco at phone: 703/264-7235 or

e-mail: [email protected].

While patent trolls hurt firms of all sizes, the majority of PAE lawsuits target small and inventor-driven companies.‘‘

NPES News 082113_Layout 1 8/22/13 5:04 PM Page 11

Page 12: Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013Volume XXXII, Number 6 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 MUST SEE ’EMS tech-nology and product recognition takes place each year in conjunction with

12

CALENDAR

NPES News is published bi-monthly by NPES.

Publisher:Ralph J. Nappi

Director of Communications:Deborah Vieder 703/264-7222

Managing Editor:Jane Pratt 703/264-7200 x242

Correspondents:Jackie BlandEileen CassidyMark Nuzzaco

Circulation:Margie Garr 703/264-7200

The Association for Suppliers of Printing, Publishing and Converting Technologies

1899 Preston White DriveReston, VA 20191 USA703/264-7200e-mail: [email protected]

DID YOU KNOW?The forest products

industry is the largest producer of renewable biomass energy in the United States, generating 77% of the nation’s industrial biomass energy. Additionally, the renewableenergy generated by the forest products industry exceeds all of the nation’s solar, wind and geothermal energy generation

combined.—American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA), “2012

Sustainability Report”

September 2013EXECUTIVE OUTLOOK Conference September 7 • Chicago, Illinois

PRINT 13 and CPP EXPOSeptember 8-12 • Chicago, Illinois

October 2013TC 130 Working Groups and Plenary Meetings October 28-November 2 • Berlin, Germany

November 2013NPES 2013 Annual ConferenceNovember 11-12 • Orlando, Florida

ICC Color Symposium November 13 • Hong Kong, China

PAMEX 2013November 14-17 • New Delhi, India

ICC MeetingNovember 18-20 • Vancouver, Canada

December 2013PRIMIR 2013 Winter Meeting December 9-11 • Chicago, Illinois

March 2014Printing South China 2014 - NPES BoothMarch 3-5 • Guangzhou, China

TC130 Working Groups Meetings March 23-28 • London, United Kingdom

IPEX 2014 - NPES BoothMarch 24-29 • London, United Kingdom

Debbie OrfRekha RatnamDeborah Vieder

The first six months of 2013 basically represent a flat market with up and down fluctuations in new equipment filings.

Market Intelligence News:UCC Filing Update

A Uniform Commercial Code Form 1 (UCC–1) filing is a financing statement required by lawto be filed with the state to show that one party (usually a lender) has a security interest inanother party’s (usually a borrower’s) personal property, and most frequently relates to thecommercial financing of capital equipment through a lending institution. UCC data is filedevery day throughout the U.S. Each UCC data filing statement has three components: the bor-rower, the lender, and what the borrower purchased, including make, model and serial num-ber. Once the data is filed, EDA’s more than 50 employees manually review each filing toidentify and correctly classify the transactions of printing equipment. What results is a robustdatabase that offers subscribers continually updated information on exactly who is buying orleasing what pieces of equipment.

The chart compiled from UCC data provided herein by Equip-ment Data Associates (EDA), shows up-to-date UCC (see

definition below chart) activity for all printing equipment. Al-though UCC filings are a combination of new equipment sales,used equipment sales and re-financings of existing placements,they are still a strong indicator of market activity.

The first six months of 2013 basically represent a flat marketwith up and down fluctuations in new equipment filings. The yearstarted off with 394 units and in June, it dropped to 337 units, a14% decline. There has been a steady decline since December,where units were as high as 490 (31% decline). It is still difficult totell if we’ll witness a steady growth pattern since we continue toexperience short periods of growth followed by declines. Usedequipment filings have followed a similar up and down pattern aswell and those filings have fallen to 119 units in June, down from215 units at the start of 2013 and 146 units in December.

This information is extracted directly from EDA’s comprehen-sive database of nearly 30,000 records for purchasers of printingequipment.

For more information, or to join the free NPES Market Dataprogram, contact Assistant Director, Market Data & Research,Rekha Ratnam, at phone: 703/264-7200 or e-mail:[email protected]. For specific information about the market in-telligence services offered by EDA, contact Mauricio Jurin atphone: 704/845-1099 or e-mail: [email protected].

‘‘Printing Equipment UCC Filings: 2007–2013

New vs. Used

NPES News 082113_Layout 1 8/22/13 5:04 PM Page 12