· Web viewWeekly practice applications 85% M = 4.57 100% M = 4.6 100% 47 M = 4.08 96.7% Benchmark met Review, select and apply developmentally and culturally competent assessment,

Table 1: Assessment Matrix Foundation Benchmark is met if 3 of the 4

Course Assignment

80% earn a B or better on the assignment

Advanced Stand Course


Self-Assessment

80% at 3 or above on 5-point scale (Mean and % at 3 or

above reported)

Field Evaluation

80% at 3 or above on 5-point scale (Mean and % at 3 or

above reported)

Assessment Results

2.1.1 Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly

● Advocate for client access to the services of social work

Social Welfare Policy II

Advocacy paper

99%

Advanced Standing

Critical thinking paper

98%

M = 4.67

100%

3, 40

M = 3.71

94.7%

Benchmark met

● Practice personal reflection and self-correction to assure continual professional development

HBSE: Small Systems

Reading reflections

94%

Advanced Standing


98%

M = 4.64

100%

61, 64, 70, 73, 77

M = 3.96

95.8 %

Benchmark met

● Attend to professional roles and boundaries

SW Practice with Small Systems

Ethics group project

99%

Advanced Standing Critical thinking

paper

98%

M = 4.77

100%

1, 62, 68, 69

M = 3.99

98.4%

Benchmark met

● 2015 CSWE MSW Overall Assessment

1

● Demonstrate professional demeanor in behavior, appearance, and communication


Advocacy paper

99%

Advanced Standing


98%

M = 4.83

100%

63, 65, 67

M = 3.92

97.9%

Benchmark met

● Engage in career-long learning

Fundamentals of Research I

Article review

97%

Advanced Standing


98%

M = 4.70

100%

41, 59, 71, 72

M = 3.75

94.2%

Benchmark met

● Use supervision and consultation



99%

Advanced Standing Critical thinking

paper

98%

M = 4.58

100%

2, 60, 66

M = 4.06

98.6%

Benchmark met

2.1.2 Ethical Principles

● Recognize and manage personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide practice



99%

Advanced Standing

Final Proposal

94%

M = 4.74

100%

74

M = 3.96

99.2%

Benchmark met

● Make ethical decisions by applying standards of the National Association of Social


Advanced Standing Final Proposal

M = 4.74

100%

75

M = 4.07

Benchmark met


2

Workers Code of Ethics… Ethics group project

99%

94% 99.2%

● Tolerate ambiguity in resolving ethical conflicts



99%

Advanced Standing

Final Proposal

94%

M = 4.35

100%

76

M = 3.76

97.7%

Benchmark met

● Apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions


Advanced Standing

Final Proposal

94%

M = 4.56

100%

4

M = 3.92

98.4%

Benchmark met

2.1.3 Critical Thinking

● Distinguish, appraise,

and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, and practice wisdom


Literature review

97%

Advanced Standing

Article Critique

84%

M = 4.45

100%

78, 82

M = 3.59

92.7%

Benchmark met

• Analyze models of assessment, prevention, intervention, and evaluation

Fundamentals of Research II

Empirical article critique

100%

Advanced Standing

Article Critique

84%

M = 4.38

100%

79, 81

M = 3.95

98.4%

Benchmark met


3

● Demonstrate effective oral and written communication in working with individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and colleagues

SW Practice with Large System

Grant application

100%

Advanced Standing

Article Critique

84%

M = 4.58

100%

5, 6, 80

M = 3.77

96.2%

Benchmark met

2.1.4 Engage Diversity

and Difference

● Recognize the extent

to which a culture’s structures and values may oppress, marginalize, alienate, or create, or enhance privilege and power

HBSE: Small Systems

Presentations on chapters

94%

Advanced Standing

Final Proposal

94%

M = 4.58

100%

8

M = 3.37

87.3%

Benchmark met

● Gain sufficient self

awareness to eliminate the influence of personal biases and values in working with diverse groups



99%

Advance Standing

Final proposal

94%

M = 4.58

100%

84

M = 3.76

98.4%

Benchmark met

● Recognize and

communicate

their understanding of the

HBSE: Small Systems

Presentation on chapters

Advanced Standing

Final proposal

M = 4.70

100%

7, 83, 86

M = 3.92

Benchmark met


4

importance of difference in shaping life experiences

94% 94% 98.1%

● View themselves as learners and engage those with whom they work as informant


Policy analysis paper

97%

Advanced Standing

Final proposal

94%

M = 4.64

100%

85

M = 3.61

94.4%

Benchmark met

2.1.5 Advance Human

Rights & Social and

Economic Justice

● Understand the

forms and mechanisms of oppression and discrimination

HBSE Large Systems

Integrative paper 1

97%

Advanced Standing

Final proposal

94%

M = 4.43

100%

42

M = 2.72

70.6%

Benchmark Met

● Advocate for human rights and social and economic justice


Advocacy paper

97%

Advanced Standing

Final Proposal

94%

M = 4.38

100%

9

M = 3.16

81.2%

Benchmark met

● Engage in practices that advance social and economic justice

Social Welfare Policy I

Group project

99%

Advanced Standing

Final proposal

94%

M = 4.32

100%

10

M = 3.58

91.8%

Benchmark met


5

2.1.6 Research

Informed Practice/

Practice Informed

Research

● Use practice experience to inform scientific inquiry


Literature review

97%

Advanced Standing

Logic model

100%

M = 4.29

100%

11, 43

M = 3.50

92.1%

Benchmark met

● Research evidence to inform practice



97%

Advanced Standing

Logic model

100%

M = 4.29

100%

12

M = 3.42

93.3%

Benchmark met

2.1.7 Knowledge of Human Behavior and Social Environment

Benchmark met

● Utilize conceptual frameworks to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation

HBSE Large Systems

Integrative paper II

97%

Advanced Standing

Final proposal

94%

M = 4.4

100%

14, 44, 87

M = 3.64

91.8%

Benchmark met

● Critique and apply knowledge to understand person and environment

HBSE: Small Systems

“Think piece”

94%

Advanced Standing

Final proposal

94%

M = 4.58

100%

13, 45, 88

M = 3.44

88.3%

Benchmark met


6

2.1.8 Policy Practice – Advance Social/Economic

● Analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance social well-being



97%

Advanced Standing

Final proposal

94%

M = 4.25

100%

16, 46, 47

M = 3.45

91.5%

Benchmark met

● Collaborate with colleagues And clients for effective policy Action



97%

Advanced Standing

Final proposal

94%

M = 4.38

100%

15, 48, 49, 89

M = 3.33

84.3%

Benchmark met

2.1.9 Contexts that Shape Practice

● Continuously discover, appraise, and attend to changing locales, populations, scientific and technological developments, and emerging societal trends to provide relevant services


Descriptive analysis of legislation

99%

Advanced Standing

Paper on learning group

100%

M = 4.35

100%

17, 50, 51, 90

M = 3.45

90.9%

Benchmark met

● Provide leadership in promoting sustainable changes in service delivery

SW Practice with Large Systems

Advanced Standing

Paper on learning

M = 4.35 18, 52

M = 3.49

Benchmark met


7

And practice to improve the quality of social services

Agency/organization profile

100%

group

100%

100% 92.7%

2.1.10 Engage, Assess, Intervene & Evaluate

2.1.10(a) Engagement

● Substantively And effectively prepare for Action with individuals, families, groups, organizations, And communities


Agency/organizational profile

100%

Advanced Standing

Final proposal

94%

M = 4.54

100%

19, 20, 22

M = 3.88

98.1%

Benchmark met

● Use empathy And other interpersonal skills


Therapeutic intervention plan

99%

Advanced Standing

Final proposal

94%

M = 4.9

100%

21

M = 4.21

100%

Benchmark met

● Develop a mutually Agreed-on focus of work And desired outcomes

SW Practice with Large System

Grant writing

Advanced Standing

Final proposal

94%

M = 4.74

100%

23, 24

M = 3.72

93.6%

Benchmark met


8

100%s

2.1.10(b) Assessment

● Collect, organize, And interpret client data



99%

Advanced Standing

Psychopathology overview

89%

M = 4.54

100%

25

M = 3.53

92.2%

Benchmark met

● Assess client strengths and limitations


Community profile

100%

Advanced Standing


89%

M = 4.77

100%

26

M = 3.63

93.2%

Benchmark met

● Develop mutually agreed-on intervention goals And objectives



99%

Advanced Standing


89%

M = 4.64

100%

27

M = 3.58

91.6%

Benchmark met

● Select appropriate intervention strategies


Grant application

100%

Advanced Standing


89%

M = 4.54

100%

28

M = 3.49

92.4%

Benchmark met

2.1.10(c) Intervention


9

● Initiate actions to achieve organizational goals


Agency/organization profile

100%

Advanced Standing


89%

M = 4.46

100%

30, 33

M = 3.45

88.8%

Benchmark met

● Implement prevention interventions that enhance clients capacities


Methods paper

99%

Advanced Standing


89%

M = 4.48

96.8%

29, 91

M = 3.68

93.4%

Benchmark met

● Help clients resolve problems


Methods paper

99%

Advanced Standing


89%

M = 4.58

100%

35

M = 3.5

90.9%

Benchmark met

● Negotiate, meditate,

and advocate for clients


Legislative action assignment

99%

Advanced Standing


89%

M = 4.61

100%

31, 34, 56

M = 3.45

88.6%

Benchmark met

● Facilitate transitions

and endings


Methods paper

99%

Advanced Standing


89%

M = 4.5

100%

32

M = 3.85

96.1%

Benchmark met

2.1.10(d) Evaluation


10

● Social workers critically analyze, monitor, and evaluate interventions



100%

Advanced Standing

Final proposal

94%

M = 4.54

100%

36, 37, 38, 39, 57, 58, 92

M = 3.11

79.1%

Benchmark met

Table 2: Competencies and Practice Behaviors Distributed in the Social Work Full-Time MSW Micro Concentration Curriculum

Course Assignment

Course Assignment


Alumni Survey 80% at 3 or above on a 5-point scale

(Mean at 3 or above and %

Supervisor

Survey

80% at 3 or above on a 5-point scale

(Mean at 3 or

Field Evaluation

80% at 3 or above on 5-point scale (Mean at 3

or above and % reported)

Assessment Results


11

reported) above and % reported)


● Demonstrate the professional use of self and critical consciousness in multiple micro practice context

Advanced Practice with Small Systems I

Therapeutic intervention project

95%

M = 4.52

100%

M = 4.6

100%

1, 32

M = 4.7

98.8%

Benchmark met

● Seek supervision and consultation appropriately and stay abreast of changes in social work practice through life-long learning

Advanced Practice with Small Systems II

Micro group simulation

99%

M = 4.5

100%

M = 4.6

100%

3, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39

M = 4.24

97.8%

Benchmark met

● Communicate the purpose of social work practice with other professionals, clients and the community.



99%

M = 4.52

100%

M = 4.4

100%

2, 34

M = 4.11

98.8%

Benchmark met

2.1.2 Apply Social Work Ethical Principles to guide professional practice

● Apply the NASW Code of Ethics when making

Psychopathology M = 4.58 M = 4.8 40 Benchmark met


12

ethical decisions and resolving ethical dilemmas

Final paper

74%

100% 100% M = 4.17

97.1%

● Demonstrate and apply a professional understanding of personal and societal values in ethical decision-making with individuals, families and groups.

Dynamics of Race and Discrimination

Cultural awareness

95%

M = 4.67

100%

M = 4.6

100%

4, 41

M = 4.09

97%

Benchmark met

● 2.1.3 Apply critical thinking to inform communicate professional judgements

● Demonstrate an understanding of and an ability to critically analyze a variety of theories and practice approaches in bringing about therapeutic change in individuals, families and small groups

Psychopathology

Final paper

74%

M = 4.29

97.1%

M = 4.2

100%

5, 42, 45

M = 4.01

97.1%

Benchmark met

● Communicate orally and in writing when working with client systems and complete documentation effectively;



M = 4.58

100%

M = 4.4

100%

7, 43

M = 4.16

96%

Benchmark met


13

95%

● Draw upon a variety of sources to obtain knowledge and skills based upon scientific inquiry.

Program Evaluation

Literature review

95%

M = 4.47

100%

M = 4.4

100%

6, 44, 46

M = 4.24

97.7%

Benchmark met

2.1.4 Engage diversity and difference in practice

Utilize knowledge and skills to address social structure and cultural values that may oppress, marginalize, and alienate some, while creating privilege and power for others;


Cultural awareness paper

95%

M = 4.38

100%

M = 4.4

100%

9

M = 4.17

92.6%

Benchmark met

● Demonstrate an understanding and valuing of one’s own culture that influences personal biases and values that may create prejudices in working with diverse groups;


Cultural awareness paper

95%

M = 4.61

100%

M = 4.2

80%

39

M = 4.04

97%

Benchmark met

•Integrate effectively into practice knowledge and skills of differences and similarities, as well as dimensions of diversity.


Final paper

95%

M = 4.55

100%

M = 4.2

80%

8

M = 4.21

100%

Benchmark met


14

2.1.5 Advance human rights and social economic justice

● Demonstrate abilities to promote strengths and competence in individuals, families and small groups;



95%

M = 4.64

100%

M = 4.8

100%

23

M = 4.26

100%

Benchmark met

•Empower clients to overcome oppression and appreciate social and economic justice by developing client awareness of theories of justice and strategies to promote human and civil rights;


Final paper

95%

M = 4.5

100%

M = 4.4

100%

11

M = 3.66

91.2%

Benchmark met

● Advocate for social and economic justice on behalf of clients and to create social change.

Program Evaluation

Final paper

95%

M = 4.32

100%

M = 4.0

100%

10

M = 3.57

91.4%

Benchmark met

2.1.6 Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research

● Review practice research and select models appropriate to various client populations;

Program Evaluation

Literature review

M = 4.26

97.1%

M = 3.8

100%

29

M = 4.16

Benchmark met


15

95% 98.5%

● Apply research methods and skills in the critical examination and evaluation of their own practice;


Family therapy paper

99%

M = 4.02

97%

M = 3.4

80%

12

M = 3.77

97.3%

Benchmark met

● Document practice experiences to provide data that reflects and builds upon evidence-based intervention.

Psychopathology

Weekly practice applications

85%

M = 4.24

96.9%

M = 4.0

100%

13

M = 3.31

84.9%

Benchmark met

2.1.7 Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment

•Apply a biopsychosocial conceptual framework, to understand human conditions that affect client behavior;

Psychopathology


85%

M = 4.57

100%

M = 4.6

100%

47

M = 4.08

96.7%

Benchmark met

● Review, select and apply developmentally and culturally competent assessment, intervention and evaluation models;


Therapeutic intervention

M = 4.39

96.9%

M = 4.4

100%

15, 48

M = 3.88

Benchmark met


16

project

95%

94.4%

● Integrate knowledge of individual and family life span development in the context of the environment to understand the client’s human condition.


Family therapy paper

95%

M = 4.45

96.9%

M = 4.6

100%

14, 49

M = 4.04

96.7%

Benchmark met

2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work services

● Stay current with political, economic, social, and environmental trends that create policies that may have a negative impact on client systems;

Program Evaluation

Final Paper – political and ethics

95%

M = 4.33

100%

M = 3.8

80%

50

M = 3.93

96.6%

Benchmark met

● Collaborate with stakeholders who engage in policy making that affect program designs, program funding and service delivery;

Program Evaluation

Final paper – implications

95%

M = 4.06

97%

M = 3.8

80%

16, 51

M = 3.08

74.2%

Benchmark met

● Choose appropriate methods for advocating on


M = 4.51 M = 4.8 52 Benchmark met


17

behalf of individuals, families and small groups.

Final paper

95%

100% 100% M = 3.84

93.3%

2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape Practice

● Respond effectively to the existing context that impact the nature of services with a continuum of care model that under gird relevant services;



95%

M = 4.45

97%

M = 4.4

100%

17, 53

M = 3.83

94.5%

Benchmark met

● Act as change agents to provide leadership and promote stability in quality service delivery that address existing human needs;



95%

M = 4.42

100%

M = 4.6

100%

53

M = 3.92

95.7%

Benchmark met

● Advocate for health and mental health, and promote resiliency factors that may contribute to the reduction of risk and vulnerability.

Psychopathology

Mental health in the news

95%

M = 4.48

100%

M = 4.8

100%

18, 55

M = 3.97

93.8%

Benchmark met


18

2.1.10 (a) Engagement

● Prepare for initial client contact by integrating their knowledge, skills and values with their preliminary understanding of the client’s human conditions;


Professional literature critique

95%

M = 4.60

100%

M = 4.4

100%

19

M = 4.53

100%

Benchmark met

● Develop an awareness of ethical dilemmas that may exist in preparation for client interaction;



99%

M = 4.57

100%

M = 4.6

100%

20

M = 4.38

100%

Benchmark met

● Identify with the client’s anxiety inherent in initial interaction and purposefully use the professional self to demonstrate empathy, respect for worth and dignity of the client to facilitate the client’s sharing his/her human condition.



95%

M = 4.57

100%

M = 4.8

100%

21

M = 4.15

98.5%

Benchmark met

2.1.10(b) Assessment

● Communicate effectively with all client systems to obtain and analyze in-depth data to provide



M = 4.42

100%

M = 4.8

100%

22

M = 4.14

Benchmark met


19

answers to issues, problems, needs, resources, client strengths and assets and collaboratively involve the client system in determining intervention strategies and goals;

99% 100%

● Conduct a developmental interview that enables the client to share his/her human condition and participate in determining the effectiveness of their support network that can be utilized to implement the planned change process;



95%

M = 4.42

97%

M = 4.4

100%

23

M = 4.26

100%

Benchmark met

● Determine collaboratively a course of action which identifies those achievements and/or barriers to successful outcomes.

Psychopathology

Weekly practice application

85%

M = 4.48

97%

M = 4.8

100%

24

M = 4.09

99%

Benchmark met

2.1.10 (c) Intervention

● Enlist the client in the development of appropriate and mutually agreed-on intervention plan;



95%

M = 4.51

97%

M = 4.8

100%

25, 56

M = 4.08

98.8%

Benchmark met

● Implement collaborative intervention

Psychopathology M = 4.48 M = 4.6 26, 57 Benchmark met


20

strategies that enhance client social functioning utilizing referral sources when indicated;

Final paper

74%

97% 100% M = 4.24

96.5%

● Utilize the client’s human condition to facilitate change through negotiation, mediation and advocacy;



95%

M = 4.57

100%

M = 4.2

100%

27, 58

M = 4.21

96.5%

Benchmark met

● Seek supervision, consultation and literature review to enhance the client’s goal achievement;


Literature review

95%

M = 4.54

100%

M = 4.4

100%

59

M = 4.21

97.6%

Benchmark met

● Facilitate the client in developing and maintaining adaptive behaviors that provide stability within their environment.



95%

M = 4.45

97%

M = 4.4

100%

60

M = 4.00

96.7%

Benchmark met

2.1.10(d) Evaluation

● Monitor and evaluate interventions in collaboration with client systems

Program Evaluation

Final project

95%

M = 4.33

97.1%

M = 4.4

100%

28, 61

M = 3.91

96.2%

Benchmark met


21

● Utilize research skills to ensure best practices of evidence-based intervention;

Program Evaluation

Final project

95%

M = 4.21

97%

M = 4.0

100%

29, 62

M = 3.91

94.3%

Benchmark met

● Facilitate termination and separation of the client-worker relationship by assessing the goal attainment results, and the client’s readiness;



95%

M = 4.33

97%

M = 4.4

100%

30, 63

M = 3.67

89.3%

Benchmark met

● Develop strategies for feedback on client’s maintaining adaptive functioning;

Psychopathology


85%

M = 4.48

97%

M = 4.4

100%

31, 64

M = 3.76

93.2%

● Work collaboratively with evaluators/researchers to assess intervention efficacy and effectiveness.

Program Evaluation

Final project

95%

M = 4.18

93.9%

M = 4.0

100%

65

M = 3.62

86.9%

Benchmark met


22

Table 3: Competencies and Practice Behaviors Distributed in the Social Work Full-Time MSW Macro Concentration Curriculum

Course Assignment 80% earn a B or better on the assignment

Alumni Survey

80% at 3 or above on 5-point scale

(Mean and % at 3 or above reported)

Supervisor

Survey

80% at 3 or above on 5-point scale (Mean and

% at 3 or above reported)

Field Evaluation

80% at 3 or above on 5-point scale (Mean and % at 3 or above

reported)

Assessment Results


● Facilitate access to services for client systems with human service organizations and communities

Strategies of Community Organization

Target plan for services

100%

M = 3.75

75%

M = 5.0

100%

2, 24

M = 4.23

98.7%

Benchmark Met

● Engage staff in career learning through staff training and orientation

SW Administration

Final paper and pres.

100%

M = 3.75

75%

M = 4.0

100%

26, 27, 28, 29

M = 4.32

100%

Benchmark Met

● Use staff supervision and consultation

SW Administration Final paper and

M = 3.5 M = 5.0 3, 23, 25 Benchmark Met


23

in staff development pres.

100%

75% 100% M = 4.42

100%

● Demonstrate self-awareness in analyzing the effectiveness of service delivery systems when working with diverse populations in the student’s field placement and professional practice

Dynamics of Racism and

Discrimination

Cultural awareness

95%

M = 3.25

75%

M = 5.0

100%

1, 22

M = 4.35

100%

Benchmark Met

2.1.2 Apply social work codes of ethics to social planning, administration, and supervision with client involvement and staff participation in decision-making

● Distinguish how decisions are made with considerations of the political and organizational constraints and professional ethics and standards in HSOs

SW Administration

Final paper and pres.

100%

M = 3.25

75%

M = 5.0

100%

4, 30

M = 4.28

98.7%

Benchmark Met

● Recognize and manage personal and professional values in working with clients in community planning and administrative practice


Discrimination

Cultural awareness

95%

M = 3.75

75%

M = 5.0

100%

31

M = 4.29

100%

Benchmark Met


24

2.1.3 Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgements

● Demonstrate effective oral and written communication in working with groups, organizations, and communities and examining the ways colleagues and clients are involved in making decisions in organizations

Community Organization &

Planning

Leadership team development

100%

M = 3.5

75%

M = 5.0

100%

7, 33

M = 4.38

100%

Benchmark Met

● Apply community organization and social planning theories in working with individuals, families, groups, organizations, communities, and other professionals


Power analysis of communities

100%

M = 3.0

75%

M = 5.0

100%

5, 6, 32

M = 4.46

97.3%

Benchmark Met

2.1.4 Engage diversity and differences in administrative practice and community organization

● Demonstrate an understanding of the importance of gender in leadership roles and styles in organization


Discrimination

Weekly Quizzes

100%

M = 3.75

75%

M = missing data

%

37

M = 4.07

97.4%

Benchmark Met


25

● Apply the value of diversity in society and promote competence in understanding the uniqueness of individuals within the environment


Discrimination

Final Paper

95%

M = 3.75

75%

M = 5.0

100%

8

M = 4.3

97.5%

Benchmark Met

● Promote the dignity and self-worth of staff, clients, and consumers in administrative practices, staff supervision, and community planning


Discrimination

Final Paper

95%

M = 3.75

75%

M = 5.0

100%

38

M = 4.89

94.5%

Benchmark Met

2.1.5 Advance human rights and social and economic justice through client empowerment and staff participation in design of service delivery systems

● Utilize the power and politics as they relate to strategic planning


Planning

Defining Community

100%

M = 3.25

75%

M = 4.0

100%

40

M = 4.02

94.5%

Benchmark Met

● Assess strengths and weaknesses of the service delivery systems for clients/


Community

M = 3.5

75%

M = 5.0

100%

10

M = 4.10

Benchmark Met


26

selection

100%

100%

● Advocate for staff participation and client inclusion in designing programs in HSOs


pres.

100%

M = 3.0

75%

M = 4.0

100%

42

M =

%

Benchmark Met

● Engage clients/consumers in community planning practices that advance social and economic justice in grassroots level innovative programs


Community selection

100%

M = 2.75

75%

M = 4.0

100%

9

M = 4.11

100%

Benchmark Met

2.1.6 Apply studies in organization and leadership to administration and staff supervision

● Engage in analyzing intervention effectiveness of the organization in which students are placed and recommend changes based on management theories


pres.

100%

M = 3.5

75%

M = 4.0

100%

34

M = 5.00

100%

Benchmark Met

● Engage in analyzing organizational effectiveness with an emphasis on organizational theory


pres.

100%

M = 3.5

75%

M = 4.0

100%

11

M = 4.10

100%

Benchmark Met


27

● Provide a sound knowledge base of social planning, especially the assessment of community needs, rational decision-making, identification of alternatives, practical considerations and evaluation


Strategies Logic model

100%

M = 3.25

75%

M = 4.0

100%

39

M = 4.27

100%

Benchmark Met

2.1.7 Recognize how the human service organizations are being influenced by the political and economic environments

● Apply organizational theory in understanding the ways in which services are coordinated and staff is supervised


pres.

100%

M = 3.5

75%

M = 4.0

100%

36

M = 4.00

100%

Benchmark Met

● Critique and apply policy changes in the environment as related to the adaptation of the organization in providing services to vulnerable populations

Community, Economic System and Policy Change

Final paper

100%

M = 3.5

75%

M = 4.0

100%

12

M = 4.05

100%

Benchmark Met

● Utilize theories in power and politics in analyzing inter-organizational linkages


M = 3.5

75%

M = 3.0

100%

17

M = 4.05

Benchmark Met


28

Final paper

100%

97.2%

2.1.8 Engage in policy practice to advance social and economic well-being and to deliver effective social work services

● Advocate for services to advance the economic and social well-being of clients based on analyses of the service delivery systems


Strategies logic model

100%

M = 3.5

75%

M = 5.0

100%

13

M = 4.14

97%

Benchmark Met

● Design an efficient service delivery system in order to better serve and to better reach out to the potential clients/consumers


Final paper

100%

M = 3.25

75%

M = 4.0

100%

41

M = 4.12

96.9%

Benchmark Met

● Engage in the examination of clients’/consumers’ difficulties in obtaining the needed services from HSOs


Final paper

100%

M = 3.5

75%

M = 3.0

100%

14

M = 4.12

96.9%

Benchmark Met


29

2.1.9 Respond to contexts that shape practice

● Continually discover, appraise, and attend to changing needs of clients and emerging societal trends to provide relevant services through community organizing and social planning


Final paper

100%

M = 3.25

75%

M = 5.0

100%

15, 43, 54

M = 3.93

96.9%

Benchmark Met

● Provide leadership in promoting organizational adaptation to improve the quality of social services


Discrimination Final Paper

95%

M = 3.5

75%

M = 5.0

100%

45, 50

M = 4.06

98.4%

Benchmark Met

2.1.10 Engage, assess, intervene, and evaluate with individuals, families,

groups, organizations, and communities

2.1.10(a) Engage with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities


30

● Engage in interventions for change in organizations and communities


Power analysis of communities

100%

M = 3.5

75%

M = 4.0

100%

18

M = 4.08

97.2%

Benchmark Met

● Facilitate organizational and community change


Final presentation

100%

M = 3.25

75%

M = 4.0

100%

48

M = 4.13

97.2%

Benchmark Met

● Establish a relationship with organizations and communities


Planning

Development of leadership team

100%

M = 3.75

75%

M = 5.0

100%

19

M = 3.97

94.4%

Benchmark Met

● Negotiate mutually agreed-on strategies and desired outcomes


Final presentation

100%

M = 3.25

75%

M = 5.0

100%

47

M = 4.26

100%

Benchmark Met


31

2.1.10(b) Assess with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities

● Conduct needs assessment of organizations and communities including client/consumer strengths and weaknesses

Program Evaluation

Final paper

95%

M = 3.5

75%

M = 4.0

100%

49

M = 4.31

100%

Benchmark Met

● Develop mutually agreed upon strategies to achieve goals and objectives for organization and community change

Program Evaluation

Final paper

95%

M = 3.5

75%

M = 4.0

100%

46

M = 3.96

97%

Benchmark Met

2.1.10(c) Intervene with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities

● Apply advanced knowledge and skills to achieve organizational and community goals


Final presentation

100%

M = 3.5

75%

M = 3.0

100%

18, 52

M = 4.15

98.6%

Benchmark Met

● Utilize advocacy and change strategies that empower organizations and


Planning

M = 3.25 M = 4.0 21, 53

M = 3.72

Benchmark Met


32

communities Development of leadership team

100%

75% 100% 91.4%

● Engage organizations and communities in integration of new innovations


Final presentation

100%

M = 3.0

75%

M = 3.0

100%

20, 51

M = 4.03

98.7%

Benchmark Met

2.1.10(d) Evaluate with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities

● Empower organizations and communities in the evaluation of interventions

Program Evaluation

Final paper

95%

M = 3.0

75%

M = 3.0

100%

55

M = 3.90

93.5%

Benchmark Met


33

Documents

· Web viewWeekly practice applications 85% M = 4.57 100% M = 4.6 100% 47 M = 4.08 96.7% Benchmark met Review, select and apply developmentally and culturally competent assessment,