Upload
olinda
View
42
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
V. parahaemolyticus. Sodium transport genes & Osmoregulatory pumps Andrea, Saikumar, Stacey, & Cesar. (Kozo, et. al, 2002). Intro to V . parahaemolyticus. Gram negative bacterium, curved rod shaped with single flagellum Part of bacterial Vibrionaceae family - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
V. V. parahaemolyticusparahaemolyticus
Sodium transport genes & Sodium transport genes & Osmoregulatory pumpsOsmoregulatory pumps
Andrea, Saikumar, Stacey, & CesarAndrea, Saikumar, Stacey, & Cesar(Kozo, et. al, 2002)
Intro to Intro to VV. parahaemolyticus. parahaemolyticus
Gram negative bacterium, curved rod Gram negative bacterium, curved rod shaped with single flagellum shaped with single flagellum
Part of bacterial Vibrionaceae familyPart of bacterial Vibrionaceae family Thrives in salt water (halophilic) Thrives in salt water (halophilic)
obligate heterotrophsobligate heterotrophs Found predominately in marine and Found predominately in marine and
estuary communitiesestuary communities
(Research in Microbiology, 2004; (Research in Microbiology, 2004; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibrio_parahemolyticus)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibrio_parahemolyticus)
Pathogenesis of Pathogenesis of V. parahaemolyticusV. parahaemolyticus
Mutualistic state with oysters/shellfishMutualistic state with oysters/shellfish– Concentrated in gills of oysters due to filteringConcentrated in gills of oysters due to filtering
Pathogenic state with humans/mammals.Pathogenic state with humans/mammals.
– Causes gastrointestinal problemsCauses gastrointestinal problems– Major cause of food poisoning from consuming Major cause of food poisoning from consuming
raw/undercooked seafoodraw/undercooked seafood
((Research in Microbiology, 2004)Research in Microbiology, 2004)
Genome of Genome of V. V.
ParahaemolyticusParahaemolyticus Genome similar to Genome similar to V. choleraeV. cholerae
Two chromosomes (conserved vs. Two chromosomes (conserved vs. non-conserved genes)non-conserved genes)
Where would we expect to find Where would we expect to find Na+/H+ genes and how do we Na+/H+ genes and how do we determine the chromosomal determine the chromosomal location of theses genes?location of theses genes?
(FEMS Microbiology Review, 2001)(FEMS Microbiology Review, 2001)
Osmoregulatory Osmoregulatory Pumps Pumps
Specific genes that allows plasticity in Specific genes that allows plasticity in marine hosts (non infectious) to human marine hosts (non infectious) to human hosts (infectious)hosts (infectious)
Location of these genes within the Location of these genes within the genomegenome
Antiporter regulation effects on Antiporter regulation effects on virulencevirulence
The problem of the chicken and the eggThe problem of the chicken and the egg Evolutionary patterns Evolutionary patterns
Na+/H+ AntiporterNa+/H+ Antiporter
Na+/H+ Antiporter is a transport Na+/H+ Antiporter is a transport protein used to maintain gradients protein used to maintain gradients across the cell membraneacross the cell membrane
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/71/Antiporter.jpg
Location of the Genes of Location of the Genes of InterestInterest
Na+/H+ are Na+/H+ are essential for survival essential for survival
Expect to be Expect to be found on found on conserved regions conserved regions of the of the chromosomechromosome
FISH FISH fluorescent in situ fluorescent in situ hybridizationhybridization
(http://www.genome.gov/glossary.cfm?key=fluorescence%20in%20situ%20hybridization%20%28FISH%29)
Genome MapGenome Map
Genes encoding Genes encoding sodium pumps are sodium pumps are highly conserved highly conserved closely together closely together mostly on mostly on chromosome onechromosome one
– Gene VP2449Gene VP2449 – Gene VP1092Gene VP1092
(Kozo, et. al, 2002)Kozo, et. al, 2002)
Genes, Con’t…Genes, Con’t…
If Na+/H+ antiporter genes were found If Na+/H+ antiporter genes were found on non conserved regions this would on non conserved regions this would indicate that the genes were not indicate that the genes were not necessary for survivalnecessary for survival
Genes evolved with a specific purpose Genes evolved with a specific purpose and can be easily manipulated without and can be easily manipulated without killing the bacteriakilling the bacteria
Na+/H+ Antiporter Na+/H+ Antiporter Expression in changing Expression in changing
EnvironmentEnvironment ExperimentExperiment
– Growing the bacteria under:Growing the bacteria under:– Optimum conditions (pH, salinity, temperature, Optimum conditions (pH, salinity, temperature,
food)food)– Decreased temperatureDecreased temperature– Decreased foodDecreased food– Varying pHVarying pH
Cultures obtained and stain with the Cultures obtained and stain with the appropriate dyeappropriate dye
Antiporters will be visualized and countedAntiporters will be visualized and counted
Expected ResultsExpected Results
Under stressful conditionsUnder stressful conditions– pH extremes and varying salinitypH extremes and varying salinity
– – up regulation or down regulation of up regulation or down regulation of antiporter proteinsantiporter proteins
– Varying Temperature and Food Varying Temperature and Food supplysupply
– Expression of antiporters would not be Expression of antiporters would not be affected but cell proliferation would be affected but cell proliferation would be greatly affectedgreatly affected
Rabbit Model for Rabbit Model for Pathogenicity Pathogenicity
V. V. parahaemolyticus parahaemolyticus collected from bivalves collected from bivalves Grown in cell broths Grown in cell broths Inoculate rabbits with a fixed dosage of brothInoculate rabbits with a fixed dosage of broth Rabbits were sacrificed 24 hours post infectionRabbits were sacrificed 24 hours post infection Post mortem cell cultures Na+/H+ antiporter Post mortem cell cultures Na+/H+ antiporter
proteins stained proteins stained Cells visualized and compared with cell cultures Cells visualized and compared with cell cultures
from bivalves.from bivalves.
(Lexomboon 2000)
Expected ResultsExpected Results
Original hypothesis: Due to a change in Original hypothesis: Due to a change in environmental conditions, there should be an environmental conditions, there should be an up regulation of Na+/H+ antiporter proteinsup regulation of Na+/H+ antiporter proteins
The number of Na+/H+ antiporter proteins The number of Na+/H+ antiporter proteins will remain relatively constant.will remain relatively constant.
Side note: Side note: – This antiporter uses H+ concentrations to maintain This antiporter uses H+ concentrations to maintain
Na+ gradients. Na+ gradients. – The digestive systems of animals have a high The digestive systems of animals have a high
concentration of H+, thus enabling the antiporter to concentration of H+, thus enabling the antiporter to create a greater Na+ gradient causing osmotic create a greater Na+ gradient causing osmotic diarrhea.diarrhea.
Evolutionary Patterns
Environmental conditions– Oxygen, temperature, and salinity
have significant affects on virulence Higher salinity increases virulence
towards shrimp
Composition and metabolism of V. parahaemolyticus– Altered for adaptation– Results in increased pathogenicity
Evolutionary Patterns Evolutionary Patterns Con’t…Con’t…
Outer membrane proteins (OMP)– Play key role in adaptation to changes
in external environment– Osmolarity location is outermost part
of cell. Synthesis of OMPs
– Regulation when V. parahaemolyticus is transferred to different salinity environments
Did Pathogenesis Evolve Did Pathogenesis Evolve from a Mutualist or Vice-from a Mutualist or Vice-
Versa?Versa? Specific virulence factors exhibited
in colonization by V. parahaemolyticus
May be required for colonization
Defense mechanisms of host must be conquered in either case
The problem of the The problem of the Chicken and the eggChicken and the egg
One view: One view: – Pathogenicity evolve prior to mutualistic Pathogenicity evolve prior to mutualistic
associationsassociations Common ancestral origin of many
characteristics of host-tissue colonization? Most sensible for pathogen to lead to
symbiont: allows host and attacker to survive. V. parahaemolyticus pathogenicity islands
(PAI) on chromosomeII: 80kb of DNA.
(http://jb.asm.org/cgi/reprint/190/5/1835.pdf)
A Different View A Different View
Human host gives V. parahaemolyticus perfect environment
– Optimal temperature and nutrition allow for increase in proliferation and environment exploitation.
Virulence results from a “perfect” host
ReferencesReferences C. Xu, H. Ren, S. Wang, and X. Peng. “C. Xu, H. Ren, S. Wang, and X. Peng. “Proteomic analysis of salt-sensitive outer membrane Proteomic analysis of salt-sensitive outer membrane
proteins of proteins of Vibrio parahaemolyticusVibrio parahaemolyticus.” Research in Microbiology 155 (2004) 835-842. .” Research in Microbiology 155 (2004) 835-842.
““Vibrio parahaemolyticus” Obtained from Vibrio parahaemolyticus” Obtained from <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibrio_parahemolyticus.><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibrio_parahemolyticus.>
Kozo Makimo, et. al. “Genomic Map of Kozo Makimo, et. al. “Genomic Map of V. parahaemolyticusV. parahaemolyticus.” “V. Parahaemolyticus Image” July .” “V. Parahaemolyticus Image” July 2004. 2004.
<http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://genome.naist.jp/bacteria/vpara/images/<http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://genome.naist.jp/bacteria/vpara/images/vpem.jpg&imgrefurl=http://genome.naist.jp/bacteria/vpara/vpem.jpg&imgrefurl=http://genome.naist.jp/bacteria/vpara/index.html&h=540&w=600&sz=51&hl=en&start=1&um=1&usg=__EzFOOX4e2KQnHXnW7NqCC8ifylM=&tindex.html&h=540&w=600&sz=51&hl=en&start=1&um=1&usg=__EzFOOX4e2KQnHXnW7NqCC8ifylM=&tbnid=B1q8ILaobUJhkM:&tbnh=122&tbnw=135&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dv.%2Bparahaemolyticus%26umbnid=B1q8ILaobUJhkM:&tbnh=122&tbnw=135&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dv.%2Bparahaemolyticus%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN.>%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN.>
R. Sleator, and Colin Hill. “R. Sleator, and Colin Hill. “Bacterial osmoadaptation: the role of osmolytes in bacterial stress Bacterial osmoadaptation: the role of osmolytes in bacterial stress and and virulencevirulence.” FEMS Microbiology Reviews 26 (2001). 49-71..” FEMS Microbiology Reviews 26 (2001). 49-71.
Lexomboon, Udom. “Lexomboon, Udom. “The Infant Rabbit as a Model of Pathogenicity for Vibrio The Infant Rabbit as a Model of Pathogenicity for Vibrio parahaemolyticusparahaemolyticus”, 2000, ”, 2000, http://www.afrims.org/weblib/eapr/1971/APR71p178-181.pdf..
T.Sugiyama, T.Iida, K.Izutsu, K.Park and T.Honda. “ Precise region and character of the T.Sugiyama, T.Iida, K.Izutsu, K.Park and T.Honda. “ Precise region and character of the pathogenecity island in clinical pathogenecity island in clinical Vibrio parahaemolyticusVibrio parahaemolyticus strains.” Journal of Bacteriology strains.” Journal of Bacteriology 190(2007)1835-1837.190(2007)1835-1837.